3. TABLE III. FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERIZATION OF R-ULGS GATE
WITH MULTIPLE MISSING CELL DEFECTS.
Observation r-ULG r-ULG-II
No of defected cell→ 1 2 1 2
Output F1 F2 F1 F2 F1 F2 F1 F2
No of defective pattern 8 8 28 28 8 8 28 28
Occurrence of wire function 2 - 15 - - - 2 1
Wire function percentage 25% - 53.57% - - - 7.14% 3.57%
Occurrence of INV function - 2 - 14 - - 1 2
INV function percentage - 25% - 50% - - 3.57% 7.14%
Occurrence of Maj function 6 - 13 - 8 - 24 -
Maj function percentage 75% - 46.42% - 100% - 85.71% -
Occurrence of Minority function - 6 - 12 - 8 - 24
Minority function percentage - 75% - 42.85% - 100% - 85.71%
Occurrence of Undefined function - - - 2 - - 1 1
Undefined function percentage - - - 7.14% - - 3.57% 3.57%
TABLE IV. ADDITIONAL SINGLE CELL DEPOSITION DEFECT OF
R-ULG
Cell Cell r-ULG Output
Position Type F1 F2
P
× Maj(ABC) ABC
+ Maj(ABC) ABC
Q
× Maj(ABC) ABC
+ Maj(ABC) ABC
R
× Maj(ABC) ABC
+ C C
S
× Maj(ABC) ABC
+ Maj(ABC) ABC
III. DEFECT CHARACTERIZATION OF R-ULG
The different cell deposition defects (miss-
ing/displacement/extra deposition of cells) of the r -
ULG gate are investigated here. The defective function of
the proposed r-ULG under single and double cell deposition
(missing/additional) is reported in Table III. The results of
Table III shows that the proposed universal logic: (i) based
on r-ULG shows 75% fault tolerance and (ii) based on r-
ULG-II shows 100% fault tolerance under single cell missing
deposition. It is evident from Table II that the proposed r-ULG
achieves enviable improvement in fault tolerance (85%), area,
cell count and delay. The defective behaviour at the gate
outputs, due to extra cell deposition, is analysed in tables IV
The following observations can be made from the simu-
lation results: (1) In almost all cases, our proposed r-ULG
with undeposited cells (as defects) behaves in the following
two ways: wire functions or MV/MV-like functions. (2) Unde-
posited cell defects occurring in corner cells (cells 5, 7) change
the logic function of the r-ULG to the wire. In all other cases
of single cell missing defect, have no effect on output and thus
confirming the 75% defect tolerant design. In r-ULG-II, due
to introduction of second clock zone it has no influence on
cell missing defect and thus confirms 100% defect tolerant.
(3) In the simulations using the coherence vector engine, the
polarization level never experiences a significant drop under
cell missing defect. In all simulated occurrences, the magnitude
of the maximum polarization is above 0.9 eV (Fig. III). Note
that by definition, the MV-like function set does not include
the MV function.
It can be observed that under one cell missing defect,
the probability of having the correct majority function at the
outputs is 75% for the r-ULG and 100% for the r-ULG-II
whereas the existing fault tolerant QCA logic gates achieve
only 15% success. Again, in double cell missing defect the
proposed r-ULG logics achieve 42-85% tolerance, whereas
existing universal logic gates show 0% tolerance. Even with
multiple undeposited cells, in most cases the proposed r-ULG
produces a stable logic function: either the wire function, or the
majority-like function which are very useful for logic design.
1
2
3
4
5 6
7 8
A
B
C
F2
F1
P
Q
R S
(a) Layout of r-ULG with cell
deposition location
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1 2 3 4
AveragePolarization
# Cell Deposition
MV
MV-like
Wire
Undefined
Total
(b) Average polarization of r-ULG un-
der cell deposition
IV. SIMULATION SETUP
All the designs have been verified using QCADesigner
version 2.0.3 [9] with all default parameter specifications.
V. CONCLUSION
This paper addresses the reliability issues of
majority/minority-based computational structures synthesizing
a 100% fault tolerant universal logic in QCA (r-ULG-II)
having two complementary outputs (F1=F2). Two fault-
tolerant/reliable universal logic gate r-ULG are explored
which possess enviable 75% fault tolerance using single
clock-zone and 100% fault tolerance using multiple clock-
zone under single missing and additional cell defect. A
detailed simulation-based analysis and a characterization of
QCA defects have affirmed the reliability of the proposed
r-ULG against the manufacturing-process variations.
REFERENCES
[1] C. S. Lent, P. D. Tougaw, W. Porod, and G. H. Bernstein, “Quantum
cellular automata,” Nanotechnology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 49, 1993. [Online].
Available: http://stacks.iop.org/0957-4484/4/i=1/a=004
[2] M. Graziano, A. Pulimeno, R. Wang, X. Wei, M. R. Roch, and
G. Piccinini, “Process variability and electrostatic analysis of molecular
qca,” J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 18:1–18:23,
Sep. 2015. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2738041
[3] D. Abedi, G. Jaberipur, and M. Sangsefidi, “Coplanar full adder in
quantum-dot cellular automata via clock-zone-based crossover,” Nan-
otechnology, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 497–504, May
2015.
[4] M. Momenzadeh, J. Huang, M. Tahoori, and F. Lombardi, “Characteri-
zation, test, and logic synthesis of and-or-inverter (aoi) gate design for
qca implementation,” Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and
Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1881–1893, Dec
2005.
[5] E. Fazzion, O. Fonseca, J. Nacif, O. Vilela Neto, A. Fernandes, and
D. Silva, “A quantum-dot cellular automata processor design,” in Inte-
grated Circuits and Systems Design (SBCCI), 2014 27th Symposium on,
Sept 2014, pp. 1–7.
[6] J. Huang, M. Momenzadeh, and F. Lombardi, “On the tolerance to
manufacturing defects in molecular qca tiles for processing-by-wire,”
Journal of Electronic Testing, vol. 23, no. 2-3, pp. 163–174, 2007.
[Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10836-006-0548-6
[7] R. Farazkish, “A new quantum-dot cellular automata fault-tolerant
full-adder,” Journal of Computational Electronics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp.
506–514, 2015. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10825-
015-0668-2
[8] S. Ditti, K. Mahata, P. Mitra, and B. K. Sikdar, “Defect characterization
in coupled majority-minority qca gate,” ser. 4th International Conference
on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscal Era, 2009.
DTIS ’09, April 2009, pp. 293 – 298.
[9] K. Walus, T. Dysart, G. A. Jullien, and R. Budiman, “QCADesigner:
a rapid design and simulation tool for quantum-dot cellular automata,”
Trans. Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–29, March 2004.
561574576