SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
CASE STUDY
THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS OF
2007-2008
YASHLEEN KAUR
BBA 5TH SEM
SUMMARY
 The financial crises of 2007 – 2008 was years in making (between year 2000- 2006).
 The financial crises was primarily caused by deregulation in the financial industry. This began
years earlier with cheap credit and no proper lending standards that fuelled a housing bubble.
 There was a significant growth in lending the money for housing property as rate of interest
were very low.
 Earlier the banks use to lend it to Prime borrowers only over the time as the demands for
housing property loans increased they started to lend it to sub prime borrowers.
SUMMARY (CONTD)
 They believed that housing prices would continuously rise and hence the borrowers lack of
creditworthiness a lack on inadequacy of equity would not be a problem in recovering
loan.
 MBS ( Mortgage backed securities)- Loans were securitised by banks into MBS, a group of
mortgage loans.
 These were then further grouped into CDS (Collateralised debt obligations- is a complex
structured finance product that is backed by a pool of loans and other assets and sold to
institutional investors. A CDO is a particular type of derivative because, as its name
implies, its value is derived from another underlying asset.)
 A CDO would have different several MBS in it.
SUMMARY (CONTD)
 The owner of the CDO securities would enter into derivative transaction called CDS
(Credit Default Swap- is a credit derivative contract between two counterparties. The
buyer makes periodic payments to the seller, and in return receives a payoff if an
underlying financial instrument defaults or experiences a similar credit event).
 In 2006, housing prices started to fall for the first time in decades, at first they thought
the overheated real estate market would return to more sustainable level.
 They didn’t factor in number of factors, such as too many homeowners with
questionable creditworthiness approved for mortgage loan
SUMMARY (CONTD)
 When they were unable to pay the loans their property was taken over by the banks. When
the value of the property fell many accounts began having a negative equity i.e. the rate of
default loans were much higher than expected.
 Many CDO also began to suffer default payments. Those who have insurance against such
defaults by purchasing derivatives begin to invoke the CDS and this created an unexpected
liability for banks and insurance companies who had sold the CDS, many of them were unable
to meet the liabilities. Many financial institutions collapsed and many suffered losses.
INTERPREATION
 The Financial Crisis of 2008 was a historic systemic risk event. Prominent financial institutions
collapsed, credit markets seized up, stock markets plunged, and the world entered a severe
recession.CDOs were a leading cause of the Great Recession but not the only cause.
 A decline in the value of CDO's underlying commodities, mainly mortgages, caused financial
devastation during the financial crisis.
 During the Great Recession, the collateralized debt markets collapsed as millions of homeowners
defaulted on their mortgage loans.
 Most of the blame is on the mortgage lenders. That's because they were responsible for creating
these problems. After all, the lenders were the ones who advanced loans to people with poor
credit and a high risk of default.
INTERPREATION (CONTD)
 A lot of criticism has been directed at the rating agencies and underwriters of the CDOs and other
mortgage-backed securities that included subprime loans in their mortgage pools. Some argue the rating
agencies should have foreseen the high default rates for subprime borrowers, and they should have given
these CDOs much lower ratings than the AAA-rating given to the higher quality tranches. If the ratings were
more accurate, fewer investors would have bought into these securities, and the losses may not have been
as bad.
 We should also mention the homebuyers who were far from innocent in their role in the subprime mortgage
crisis. Many of them played an extremely risky game by buying houses they could barely afford.
 Investment bankers worsen the situation, The increased use of the secondary mortgage market by lenders
added to the number of subprime loans lenders could originate. Instead of holding the originated mortgages
on their books, lenders were able to simply sell off the mortgages in the secondary market and collect the
originating fees.
INTERPREATION (CONTD)
 Just as the homeowners are to blame for their purchases gone wrong, much of the blame
must also be placed on those who invested in CDOs. Investors were the ones willing to
purchase these CDOs at ridiculously low premiums
 There may have been a mix factors and participants that precipitated the subprime mess,
but it was ultimately human behavior and greed that drove the demand, supply, and
investor appetite for these types of loans.
VOLCKER RULE
 Volcker Rule- As used in the Volcker Rule, financial instruments consist of the following: securities,
including options on securities; derivatives (including swaps and security-based swaps), including
options on derivatives and forwards;7 or. commodity futures, or commodity futures options.
The Volcker rule generally prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading or
investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds
 It is to ensure that investment activities are not undertaken by banks.

More Related Content

More from Yashleenkaur10

Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docx
Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docxEntreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docx
Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docxYashleenkaur10
 
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docx
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docxADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docx
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docxYashleenkaur10
 
corporate social responsibility
corporate social responsibilitycorporate social responsibility
corporate social responsibilityYashleenkaur10
 
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptx
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptxWHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptx
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptxYashleenkaur10
 
The eyes have it..pptx
The eyes have it..pptxThe eyes have it..pptx
The eyes have it..pptxYashleenkaur10
 
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptx
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptxMEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptx
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptxYashleenkaur10
 
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptx
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptxDIGITAL MARKETING.pptx
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptxYashleenkaur10
 
courage and commitment.pptx
courage and commitment.pptxcourage and commitment.pptx
courage and commitment.pptxYashleenkaur10
 

More from Yashleenkaur10 (9)

Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docx
Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docxEntreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docx
Entreprenurship ASSIGNMENT.docx
 
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docx
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docxADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docx
ADVANCE CORPORATE FINANCE ASSIGNMENT.docx
 
corporate social responsibility
corporate social responsibilitycorporate social responsibility
corporate social responsibility
 
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptx
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptxWHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptx
WHAT TRIGGERS CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOUR. PPT.pptx
 
The eyes have it..pptx
The eyes have it..pptxThe eyes have it..pptx
The eyes have it..pptx
 
merchant banker.pptx
merchant banker.pptxmerchant banker.pptx
merchant banker.pptx
 
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptx
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptxMEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptx
MEANS OF TRANSPORT.pptx
 
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptx
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptxDIGITAL MARKETING.pptx
DIGITAL MARKETING.pptx
 
courage and commitment.pptx
courage and commitment.pptxcourage and commitment.pptx
courage and commitment.pptx
 

CASE STUDY Financial crisis 2007-8.pptx

  • 1. CASE STUDY THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2007-2008 YASHLEEN KAUR BBA 5TH SEM
  • 2. SUMMARY  The financial crises of 2007 – 2008 was years in making (between year 2000- 2006).  The financial crises was primarily caused by deregulation in the financial industry. This began years earlier with cheap credit and no proper lending standards that fuelled a housing bubble.  There was a significant growth in lending the money for housing property as rate of interest were very low.  Earlier the banks use to lend it to Prime borrowers only over the time as the demands for housing property loans increased they started to lend it to sub prime borrowers.
  • 3. SUMMARY (CONTD)  They believed that housing prices would continuously rise and hence the borrowers lack of creditworthiness a lack on inadequacy of equity would not be a problem in recovering loan.  MBS ( Mortgage backed securities)- Loans were securitised by banks into MBS, a group of mortgage loans.  These were then further grouped into CDS (Collateralised debt obligations- is a complex structured finance product that is backed by a pool of loans and other assets and sold to institutional investors. A CDO is a particular type of derivative because, as its name implies, its value is derived from another underlying asset.)  A CDO would have different several MBS in it.
  • 4. SUMMARY (CONTD)  The owner of the CDO securities would enter into derivative transaction called CDS (Credit Default Swap- is a credit derivative contract between two counterparties. The buyer makes periodic payments to the seller, and in return receives a payoff if an underlying financial instrument defaults or experiences a similar credit event).  In 2006, housing prices started to fall for the first time in decades, at first they thought the overheated real estate market would return to more sustainable level.  They didn’t factor in number of factors, such as too many homeowners with questionable creditworthiness approved for mortgage loan
  • 5. SUMMARY (CONTD)  When they were unable to pay the loans their property was taken over by the banks. When the value of the property fell many accounts began having a negative equity i.e. the rate of default loans were much higher than expected.  Many CDO also began to suffer default payments. Those who have insurance against such defaults by purchasing derivatives begin to invoke the CDS and this created an unexpected liability for banks and insurance companies who had sold the CDS, many of them were unable to meet the liabilities. Many financial institutions collapsed and many suffered losses.
  • 6. INTERPREATION  The Financial Crisis of 2008 was a historic systemic risk event. Prominent financial institutions collapsed, credit markets seized up, stock markets plunged, and the world entered a severe recession.CDOs were a leading cause of the Great Recession but not the only cause.  A decline in the value of CDO's underlying commodities, mainly mortgages, caused financial devastation during the financial crisis.  During the Great Recession, the collateralized debt markets collapsed as millions of homeowners defaulted on their mortgage loans.  Most of the blame is on the mortgage lenders. That's because they were responsible for creating these problems. After all, the lenders were the ones who advanced loans to people with poor credit and a high risk of default.
  • 7. INTERPREATION (CONTD)  A lot of criticism has been directed at the rating agencies and underwriters of the CDOs and other mortgage-backed securities that included subprime loans in their mortgage pools. Some argue the rating agencies should have foreseen the high default rates for subprime borrowers, and they should have given these CDOs much lower ratings than the AAA-rating given to the higher quality tranches. If the ratings were more accurate, fewer investors would have bought into these securities, and the losses may not have been as bad.  We should also mention the homebuyers who were far from innocent in their role in the subprime mortgage crisis. Many of them played an extremely risky game by buying houses they could barely afford.  Investment bankers worsen the situation, The increased use of the secondary mortgage market by lenders added to the number of subprime loans lenders could originate. Instead of holding the originated mortgages on their books, lenders were able to simply sell off the mortgages in the secondary market and collect the originating fees.
  • 8. INTERPREATION (CONTD)  Just as the homeowners are to blame for their purchases gone wrong, much of the blame must also be placed on those who invested in CDOs. Investors were the ones willing to purchase these CDOs at ridiculously low premiums  There may have been a mix factors and participants that precipitated the subprime mess, but it was ultimately human behavior and greed that drove the demand, supply, and investor appetite for these types of loans.
  • 9. VOLCKER RULE  Volcker Rule- As used in the Volcker Rule, financial instruments consist of the following: securities, including options on securities; derivatives (including swaps and security-based swaps), including options on derivatives and forwards;7 or. commodity futures, or commodity futures options. The Volcker rule generally prohibits banking entities from engaging in proprietary trading or investing in or sponsoring hedge funds or private equity funds  It is to ensure that investment activities are not undertaken by banks.