Achieving Scientific Literacy

Scientific Literacy
Attempts to achieve widespread scientific literacy, however, become as difficult as understanding concepts in science. Even if formal education can
provide basic scientific literacy for students in preparing for the workplace, science education in schools can hardly satisfy the needs of the general
public towards improvement of their scientific literacy.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Essay Scientific Inquiry
Scientific inquiry is a process of critical thinking and asking questions that helps determine factual information that has been tested and proved or
disproved instead of relying on assumptions and intuition. Scientific inquiry is important in psychology, as it is in all fields of science, allowing us to
examine assumptions, assess outcomes, discern hidden values, evaluate evidence, and put ideas to the test. This scientific approach guards us against
hindsight bias, believing after learning an outcome that we would have foreseen it, known also as the knew–it–all–along phenomenon. It also protects
us from judgmental overconfidence, the bias to seek information that confirms a judgment based on intuition. Hindsight bias and overconfidence...show
more content...
This one individual, if studied, would provide a different set of data then the one's used to conclude that smokers die younger. The survey is another
useful tool that asks questions and asks people to report their behavior or opinions. Surveying allows a psychologist to gather information from large
groups, but this can still error because the requested information relies on the wording of a question, the group selected to respond, and the
respondents giving accurate self reports. If we were to survey students on college campus on their drinking habits we will get a very different response
from the professors on the same college campus with the same survey. Naturalistic observation is a research method that allows us to watch and record
data in a natural occurring environment. This allows us to observe situations without external controls or manipulations. However, naturalistic
observation only permits us to describe a behavior, not explain it. The correlation method is a statistical measure that makes data that may have gone
unnoticed, now seen to the eye by indicating the possibility of a relationship between two closely related things. Statistics show that children today
watch more television, while another shows children today read less. With these two ideas we may predict a statistical relationship that children today
read less because they are watching more television. The down side to this approach is that correlation does not provide

Scientific responsibility can be described as the duties or obligations are scientist or researcher has when conducting his or her research. Science relies
on objective methods to gather empirical data without the interference of subjectivity or other factors affecting the results obtained. Science is an
extremely important tool for humanity as the discoveries made in the scientific community can greatly impact the lives of individuals through
advancements in therapies to novel drug discoveries. However, the other side of science poses a potential threat to same individuals it often intends to
serve. This can be the case when results are published which can potentially pose threats to potentially large groups of people. It is therefore asked
whether scientists should be ultimately responsible for the research that they publish, or could it be that they have a duty to publish research regardless
of its implications in the pursuit of scientific advancement.
Scientific responsibility is an expansive term and can be subdivided into the different accountabilities a scientist may have when conducting their
research. This varies upon personal opinion in the scientific community but to some degree includes conducting research in the appropriate, objective
manner and producing research that will be of benefit rather than producing profitable research that only seeks to benefit stakeholders. Another
important responsibility of scientists is communication. This is because research

The Scientific Method is the approach that scientists use to investigate some phenomena. It's a standard technique to find cause and effect of a
particular problem.
I am going to introduce how the scientific method works using interesting research paper "Racial and Ethnic Residential Segregation, the Neighborhood
Socioeconomic Environment, and Obesity among Blacks and Mexican Americans". There are a series of steps that scientists used to understand the
problem.
The first step of the scientific method is observation of phenomena. The authors of article observed a high rate of obesity. In such a case they began
their investigation with making a number of different observations concerning obesity.
So once they decided what to investigate, the...show more content...
Goal of the experiment was to determine the effect of racial and ethnic residential segregation, the neighborhood socioeconomic environment on level
of obesity. So to know if our hypothesis is correct was used cross–sectional data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey on
approximately 5000 black and Mexican–American adult participants who was living in disadvantaged segregated neighborhoods (1999–2006). These
areas were chosen for the experiment because they implied as poor with limited access to health–promoting resources. Segregation could impact the
obesity level, which had increased for blacks and Mexican Americans. So to prove the hypothesis was conducted experiment which determines the
impact of racial/ethnic segregation with limiting opportunities on the level of obesity.
During the experiment were calculated obesity body mass index and were identified participants who were obese in areas of black and Mexican
American segregations. Having carefully recorded data is very important during the experiment because it could lead to more correct conclusion. So for
accurate recording of observation some of participants were excluded from the experiment because was missing the information about their height or
weight, educational level, income, or because some of them were

Scientific Method
Science is an objective method used explain the natural phenomena of the universe. The practice of a scientific method provides a detailed outline that
contributes to expressing how to determine if a theory is scientific. A continual cycle that emphasizes the techniques of observations, questions,
hypothesis, prediction, experiment, and conclusion. The complications that arise when applying the scientific method to all theories is that science is
subject to change; therefore, it is hard to modify extensive ideas to a few simplified steps. A scientific explanation depends on existing experimental
theories to validate or disprove present and future logical arguments. This is because previous observations support abstract methods that may not be
testable and the continual change is dependent on specific predictions and discoveries.
Many aspects of scientific knowledge are hypothetical ideas, however, they contribute the same level of importance compared to a logical fact. A
scientific explanation is shaped from existing intelligence to develop future studies and...show more content...
Science is revised constantly; progressive observations that support and expand on existing ideas are documented. When new knowledge is interpreted
by scientists, they must perform a series of experimental trials. These observations can either confirm or contradict the analysis, both are beneficial to
resolving the experiment. Scientific explanations are dependent of proof. For example, when a new theory is published, the scientific method for the
examination is accessible for others to review. The public has the capacity to acquire the experiment's reports and contribute that data to their own
hypothesis. Science is justified through the combination of solutions. Current ideas are continually challenged by others attempting to modify and
simplify them into a universal

Evaluation Of Scientific Research Methods Essay
EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH METHODS
St. Cloud State University
Abstract
This term paper evaluates the formats of different type of research papers available today. The additional knowledge for the comparison have been
gained from the textbook Research Methodology: A Step–by–step Guide for Beginners – Fourth Edition (2014) with the available types of research
papers and research methodologies. This paper includes the types of research paper and presents the appropriate suggestion. The paper will help the
faculty member of Information Assurance to improve the format of available research paper format. This term paper will also add to the available
knowledge base of MSIA community.
Introduction
This paper summarizes the types of research papers used widely in the science world. These papers can be categorized into Qualitative, Quantitative,
Statistical and Experimental researchers.
The scientific research paper different from other research paper as they involve more numeric calculation and hence statistical and experimental
research method are widely popular. In this paper, we will discuss how different research methodologies are incorporated to write the research papers
for scientific work.
SETTING OBJECTIVE
The first and most important step in the research study is the formulation of a research problem. A clear statements of research problem will help to
develop an effective research. The main purpose of formulating a research

What Are Scientific Merit?
Concept of Scientific Merit Introduction As future scholars who are working on our PhD, we tend to hear a lot about Scientific Merit. But, that
same old question might pop in our mines, which is who really cares? We should, especially if we expect the IRB to approve our research
proposal. Therefore, within this paper, we will discuss scientific merits, explain the dimensions of scientific merit, discuss the aspects of the study,
we chose for the Scientific Merit, and choose an area of scientific merit that we would improve. Scientific merit Scientific merit is considered as a
way to examine if our research study represents good science. Therefore, we will need to make sure that any research we are working on, clearly
states the research questions and its overall objectives. The research should also include the contextual data that will also have peer–reviewed literature
to support why the research is needed. We also should make sure that if human beings are being used as participants, that their privacy and safety
will be respected, and if there is any possibility of harm, no matter how small it is, and the benefit and risks whether indirect or direct for the
partakers in the study needs to be very clear in the research proposal. According to Gonzales (2013, para. 2, p. 1), the data collection, recruitment, and
analysis should align with the research questions, as well as the monitoring, safe storage, and how the data will be destroyed should also be specified.
Three

scientific literacy Essay
Scientific literacy
Introduction and audience
When talk about science, perhaps majority of us think it is less relative with real life. However, as society developed, science encompassed us
everywhere. This situation forces everyone to acquire the ability to learn and understand science. Some may think that, scientific literacy is what a
scientist should have and nothing about normal people, however it is just too narrow. Look around the surroundings of us, everything is conned with
science. Also, we encounter science in our normal life as well. Therefore, the ability to acquire and understand science is necessary and important,
which is called scientific literacy. Scientific literacy is the foundation of science and technology...show more content...
Also, they might doubt the ingredient of their product (thinking creatively). What were they made of, would that influence their health? Finally, we
made the decision, it was a deceptive advertising and we wouldn't purchase it(problem solved). This is the one typical example process of using
scientific way to solve problems.
So far, we could tell scientific literacy is useful, but does it necessary for us? The next part is telling why it is necessary and the basic science
knowledge to acquire it.
Science knowledge is necessary
As the rapid development of science and technology, everyone in society is required to acquire higher scientific literate skill. What if one doesn't
acquire scientific literacy, not only he/she could not engage in science study or research, but would encounter difficulties in normal life. For
example, when we want to look for a book in the library, it would be so simply if we check it online, copy the index of the book and then go find it
directly. However, people who don't have the ability to acquire computer skill would have difficult. Therefore, scientific literacy is necessary in
contemporary life.
There is no doubt that science knowledge is the significant part of scientific literacy. Therefore, learning science is the first step. What is science? Just
taking a look at our surroundings, it not hard to find that science is everywhere. Simply example like how the lamp is lighted, which

Scientific Notation Essay
Scientific Notation
Essential question: How can you use scientific notation to express numbers of different quantities?
Scientific notation is a method of writing or displaying numbers in terms of a decimal number between 1 and 10, which is multiplied by a power of 10
Ex. Step 1 – 3 105 First, you would solve for the exponents Step 2 – 3 100000 Then, you would multiply the factors that are left Step 3 – 300000
Lastly, you get your answer
Essential Answer: Scientific Notation can be used to express different quantities by reducing a large or small number into a short mathematical sentence.
Integers
Essential Question: Why are using integers easier than a...show more content...
How to find a 3D figures Volume
Essential Question: What figures does volume apply to?
Volume is the amount of 3–dimensional space an object occupies. In the equations for volume, B means area of the bases and h means distance
between the bases. Remember to always add the cubed sign at the end of your answer ( # unit3).
Ex. Find the volume of a figure that is 5 in. long, 7 in. wide, and 8 in. tall. Step 1– V = BhFirst, find the equation for the figure.
Step 2– V = (35)8Then, find the base and substitute.
Step 3– V = 280 in3Lastly, solve for V.
Essential Answer: It applies to only 3D figures.
How to find a 3D figures Surface Area
Essential Question: How is finding surface area different than finding volume?
Surface area is the total area of the surface of a three–dimensional object. For surface area, the equation is SA = Ph + 2B. P stands for the perimeter of
the base. The h stands for the distance between the bases. B stands for area of the bases.
Ex. Find the volume of a box that is 2 feet long, 4 feet wide, and 3 feet

The Scientific Method Essay
The Scientific Method is the standardized procedure that scientists are supposed to follow when conducting experiments, in order to try to construct a
reliable, consistent, and non–arbitrary representation of our surroundings. To follow the Scientific Method is to stick very tightly to a order of
experimentation. First, the scientist must observe the phenomenon of interest. Next, the scientist must propose a hypothesis, or idea in which the
experiments will be based around. Then, through repeated experimentation, the hypothesis can either be proven false or become a theory. If the
hypothesis is proven to be false, the scientist must reformulate his or her ideas and come up with another hypothesis, and the experimentation begins
again. This...show more content...
Furthermore, flies were observed laying eggs where the maggots formed. Thus, he concluded that maggots are the result of flies, not spontaneous
generation. He then called the principles behind his experiment "Metodo Scientifico" or The Scientific Method.
The first cases of what would be considered properly using the Scientific Method can be found earlier, though, back in the studies of Galileo, early
in the 17th century. He first observed that heavy objects gain speed as they fall. He then proposed, or hypothesized, that the rate of falling of massive
objects was proportional to the distance that the object has fallen. Following the Scientific Method, he tested his hypothesis and found it to be false,
since objects falling unequal distances do not fall in the same amount of time, as his hypothesis led to. Since his hypothesis failed, he made a new one,
which proposed that the rate at which an object falls is directly proportional to the time the object has spent falling. This was tested by rolling balls
down an inclined plane and calculating the speed and time values from those observations. Later, these experiments led to the discovery of the
gravitational constant g, and a better understanding of the Scientific Method.
The Method has been used many times since Galileo conducted his experiments, and it has been considered a valid way of conducting experiments since

Value of Science Essay
3/14/2013
Values
Science is undoubtedly a very important part of growing as the human race. It has improved our lives drastically from the first stone tools, to iPods
and cars we drive. But what is it really that matters when it comes to science? Material things are not the only things that science gives humanity.
Richard Feynman explains his point of view of the values of science, and on how science is used to create things beneficial and afflicting, how the
values behind science are affected by society, and how science affects people. The very first point brought up ismorality. Science is not morally
oriented to do good or bad and can easily do either. Feynman referenced a Buddhist proverb he heard while visiting Honolulu, "To...show more content...
For example, recently we had a large hoopla about stem cell research because of the supposed "farming babies". When in reality, the stem cells were
in vitro fertilized eggs from artificially inseminated parents that would have been thrown away. Those extra fertilized eggs contained cells that have the
capability of creating any cell in the human body, and with the future possibility of growing replacement/repair body parts of patients; it would have
been a huge leap in the medical field. But because of our own ignorance to the science behind it, we effectively closed the continuum of scientific
progress. Feynman wrote a small poetic section putting into perspective how great and complicated humans are, but showing how miniscule they are
compared to the universe. Also, how it is a "religious experience" to have you put into perspective through science itself. He says that artists and singers
won't sing about it because not everyone can understand the science, but the scientists who can explain it.
The last value of science is the methodology behind being a scientist. Feynman explains how all scientists have lots of experience with "ignorance and
doubt" and after time, effort, testing and further degrees of uncertainty, subjects can still are unsure, with doubt, and uncertainty. Logic, data, critical
thinking and reasoning can only be as important of understanding. The understanding of the numerous struggles within science has been

Science Observation Essay
The scientific method, as defined by the American Heritage Dictionary, is the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and
theoretical explanation of phenomena (Shrake, 2006). More specifically the scientific method has lead us to answer questions as to why an apple hits
the ground after falling from a tree or observing similarities between electricity and lightening. Scientists have used the scientific method to develop
experiments dating back to Ancient Greece and now other individuals can experience firsthand more than 450 scientific exhibits at the Museum of
Science and Industry located in Tampa Florida. Wanting to experience this personally I visited the Museum of Science and Industry on Wednesday 9
/28/16....show more content...
I found my thoughts racing asking what kind of dinosaurs are they? How long ago did they roam this earth? What kind of food did they eat? With
every new exhibit and room my mind expanded with new knowledge and ideas. As I walked pass the dinosaur fossils onto the second floor,
immediately in front of me was a 3D printing exhibit. In this exhibit I saw items such as pieces of art, toys, a human heart, a duck prosthetic limb,
car models and parts, weapons, plates, and utensils to eat with. We as a human race have gone from having to spend hours, days, weeks, months or
even years to complete projects and now we can simply upload a program into a computer hooked up to a 3D printer in a matter of minutes
complete a project. With the ongoing advancements in technology it begs the question how far are we from being able to print organic materials
such as organs. It was truly a marvel to be able to see how far we have come but also extremely humbling to think how much further we can go.
There is still so much more to discover because the MOSI sits four stories tall with each floor exploring the enormous possibilities science has to
offer. The MOSI is also home to one of few IMAX theaters in Florida. Upon entering the theater, you quickly realize it is not the traditional design
you may find at your local mall to watch Angry Birds or Finding Dory. The screen is in the shape of a giant eye ball verses it being flat like a
board. Sitting in angled seats watching any of the 5 choices of films the theater plays is an experience. The screen itself covers your entire field of
view immersing yourself into the film and making you feel as you are a part of it. More specifically during the presentation of A Beautiful Planet you
felt as though you were gliding along the rivers feeling the movements of the waves crashing along the shore

Scientific Theory Essay
Scientific Theory
A scientific theory is a well–substantiated explanation of some aspects of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly
confirmed through observation and experiment. Scientist creates scientific theories from hypothesis that have been corroborated through the scientific
method, then gather evidence to test their accuracy. The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain, which is
measured by its ability to make falsifiable predictions with respect to the phenomena. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and
comprehensive for of scientific knowledge.
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving...show more content...
Theories are the main goal in science and no explanation can achieve a higher rank. (to the belief that "theories" become "laws" over time). In some
cases, theories can unify. Two or more theories can be replaces by a single theory which explains the previous theories as approximations or special
cases, comparable to the way a theorys is connecting explanation for many confirmed hypotheses: This is reffered to as Unification of Theories. Both
scientific laws and scientific theories are produced from scientific methods through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are typically supported by observation and experimental science. However, scientific laws are descriptive accounts
of how nature will behave under certain conditions. Scientific theories are broader in scope, and give overarching explanations of how nature works
and why it exhibits certain characteristics. They are supported by evidence from many different sources, and may contain one or more laws.
Both scientific laws and scientific theories come from the scientific method through the formation and testing of hypotheses, and can predict the
behavior of the natural world. Both are usually well supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. However laws are descriptive accounts of
how nature will behave under certain conditions. Assumption is a

Essay on Views on the Importance of Science
Views on the Importance of Science
Different people have different views on the importance of scientific concepts in comparison to other branches of knowledge. In order to determine if
it is reasonable to believe that science is a supreme form of knowledge, firstly we must determine what knowledge is. Knowledge can be seen as the
act of knowing or understanding gained through experience or study. Thus in order for something to be considered as knowledge it must be true to the
person who has that knowledge based on the information available to them at that time There are many different branches of knowledge from science,
to ethics, religion and history. Secondly, we must determine what science...show more content...
Furthermore, the rate at which progress occurs in science and the amount of knowledge acquired about the world through Science is astounding
especially when compared to the rate of progress at which humans acquire knowledge in other areas, such as philosophy or History. However, this does
not mean that other branches of knowledge should be overlooked or that information gained through scientific procedure is always entirely accurate.
The belief that science is the supreme form of knowledge has been widely viewed throughout history, dating back to Ancient Greece where Aristotle
developed the scientific method. One movement in philosophy that believed in this view strongly were the logical positivists. Logical positivism began
in the early twentieth century in Europe and believed that science, along with maths, were the only true types of knowledge.
Although there are many positive aspects of knowledge gained through science, there are also many limitations to such knowledge. Firstly, it has been
known for scientific theories to be proved wrong for instance in the past scientists believed that the earth revolved around the moon. This also
addresses the problem of how knowledge gained through science is dependant on time and technology. Many scientific

Science And Its Impact On Science
While science serves as a trustworthy means, humans have disrespected it as an insufficient end. The results produced by scientific experiments are
legitimate to a particular population, in a particular environment, at a particular time. The results of such do not substantiate claims or assertions of the
broadest category of "human nature". Science may lead us to conclude a correlation of human behavior, but to claim a causation would be vastly
outside the testable scope of science. Godfrey–Smith explains the "unsteady" history of science (Godfrey–Smith, 2003), however, science remains a
trustworthy venue. It is humans that are responsible for representing it in untrustworthy ways. As in any other domain, science seems to have endured a
history of creating theories, proving those theories wrong, and creating new ones from that. This evolution of ideas and ways of thinking do not
discredit science's validity, but instead prove that we have grown and learned over time, through advancements in technology and greater
understandings of why we are asking particular questions about the world (Godfrey–Smith, 2003). The underlying untrustworthy aspect regarding
science is not in the scientific results themselves, but the discussion and human conclusions drawn from such findings.
In order to understand, we must go back to the results themselves and try to understand what they are showing us; whether that be descriptive or
normative data, or both (Godfrey–Smith, 2003). A major

Ethics in Science Essay
What do you think of when you hear or see the word "science"; test tubes, Einstein, Space? Science is "generally taken as meaning either (a) the exact
sciences, such as chemistry, physics, etc., or (b) a method of thought which obtains verifiable results by reasoning logically from observed fact"
(Orwell). Scientists are those who study science by scientific method. These "men of science", which Orwell describes as "a biologist, and astronomer,
perhaps a psychologist or a mathematician", "work by means of induction and deduction, and that by the help of these operations, they, in a sort of
sense, wring from Nature certain other things, which are called natural laws, and causes, and that out of these, by some cunning skill of their own,
...show more content...
This undoubtedly demonstrations the pros and cons of inventions made through science. There are people who abuse medicine, and other creations
from science, for numerous different reasons. Things like guns and nuclear weapons were formed to protect, but with the downside of killing
others. With all of this this being said, should there be a limit to things we make? More importantly, does science have an ethical responsibility to
humanity? I think to answer that question, we need to start with deciding if scientists have an ethical responsibility to humanity. As the saying goes,
with knowledge comes power and with power comes responsibility. However, there can be no limitation on the knowledge obtained from science.
Instead, we must limit what arises from knowledge and power. What are some responsibilities of scientists and the rest of the population? Well, to
start on the broadest sense, science should only be used for the absolute necessary improvement of humanity. It is our ethical responsibility to not
take advantage of science to further the advancement of military power, as we have done with the creation of atomic and nuclear bombs. Is it
responsible to use science for fame, fortune and glory? No, and it is not acceptable, but it is common for people to do so. If, for some reason, we had
the option to save 80% of endangered wildlife through scientific means, but with the consequence of harming the atmosphere, would it be ethical to
continue on? We would have

Science Essay
For some people science is the supreme form of all knowledge. Is this view reasonable or does it involve a misunderstanding of science or of
knowledge?
For many persons science is considered the supreme form of all knowledge, as science is based on facts and theories and it reaches its results through
an approved scientific method. Consequently, it seems to be objective and thus more truthful and reliable. However, other persons argue that this is a
misunderstanding of science. Hence, one should question what science and knowledge entail. Can there actually be some form of knowledge that
overrules all other types of human knowledge? Is scientific knowledge actually always objective? Are there other types of knowledge of equal worth?
This...show more content...
Thus, perception, in this case could be considered an important factor that makes a piece of knowledge supreme. One could then deduce that frogs have
these organs and that most multi–cellular animals also have these organs, after having looked and compared a large sample. This is where reasoning,
as a way of knowing, comes into use to make generalisations. And one can be quite sure that this fact is true since it has been seen, and at any moment
in time, if someone dissects a frog, he/she will see these organs. In this example, there is very little room for human emotions/ bias to affect the
perception, since one cannot argue that what's inside the frog's body is something other than its organs.
On the other hand, there are other parts in the field of biology that are less supreme. Consider the example of a field study where a scientist is to
investigate if leaves closer to the trunk of oak trees in Scania are larger than those being further away from the trunk. The biologist will make a plan
on how to conduct the experiment, and since he cannot measure all leaves in all trees existing in Scania, the biologist will have to carry out the field
study on a sample, which raises the question: what could be an appropriate sample? Most scientists agree that the best way to conduct a field study is
being as random as possible. But how does one go about being random? Scientist may have different ways of reasoning on what would make an
appropriate sample, but no way

Scientific Method
Scientific Method
The Scientific Method is simple set of rules meant to help people find an answer to any question through experimentation and research. It is globally
known for its effectiveness in answering difficult problems. While some steps may seem complicated, they can be more simple then was thought
beforehand. While some people think only scientists use it, it's actually used by everyone all the time, which is why it's important to learn the process.
While some steps are more complicated than others, there are only six to memorize. The first to find a question that people don't know the answer to,
and go from there. Step two is to form a hypothesis as to what the answer will be. Afterwards, it is a smart decision to research the question being
answered to help understand it more. Experimentation is the next step in the process, and is more hands on than the others. The second to last step is to
collect data and information from the experiment that was just completed. Lastly, the person using the scientific method will used the data to determine
the answer of the dilemma. However, some areas state differences in the steps, as this is the most commonly used way of answering a problem....show
more content...
Steps of the Scientific Method states that the hypothesis comes after research, for one case. Info from Logic and the Scientific Method says next to
nothing about the steps, and everything about who used it first. Examples of testable questions are shown on Science Fair Central. Not every area has
the same information, which may make it difficult to find. However, scientists agree it's used for

Scientific Literacy Evaluation
"Scientific literacy is knowing science as a way of thinking, finding, organising and utilising information to make decisions" (Rennie, 2005).
Evaluation
I have planned and chosen the curriculum links aligned with the activity and the outcome. I have carefully planned the resources/ materials required for
the experiment, including plain flour, soft icing mixture and corn flour, water and food colouring. I believe that children would be engaged and
motivated in the experiment, as they observe my demonstration and the curiosity to find out the mysterious mixture. Next time, I would ask students to
bring a list of items from their kitchen pantry, and to use one of them as an additional mixture, as they will be interested in trying out a mixture of their
choic, such as whole meal (wheat, flour), and rice flour. Next time, I would ensure that the lesion is timed well.
Discussion...show more content...
It instantly triggered her enthusiasm and she was set ready to answer educator's questions. The activity was mainly focussed upon chemical science.
She had the basic knowledge about the state of matter, as she could clearly identify the difference between solid and liquid (Transcript line). However,
she was unsure about the state of flour. According to Vygotsky, children can carry out difficult things when they collaborate with adults, when
compared to their own effort (McDevitt, p.222). To clarify the child's doubt about the state of flour, educator has crafted the fourth question, aligning
with the zone of proximal development proposed by Vygotsky, presenting maximum cognitive growth (p.223). Once she gained the confidence of
making a mixture with plain flour, she could not wait longer, as she proceeded in making the other mixtures. As she answered educator's questions, she
experimented with the mixture, observing and exploring the

Achieving Scientific Literacy

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Achieving Scientific Literacy

Similar to Achieving Scientific Literacy (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Achieving Scientific Literacy