Women give just over 50% of the population, yet they are only represented around 25-30% in the film industry. The questions arise: What stories are being told? Who tell the stories? And to whom? What is the responsibility we as filmmakers are bearing?
6. “Women have served all these centuries as
looking – glasses possessing the magic
and delicious power of reflecting the figure
of a man at twice his natural size.” Virginia
Wolf
7.
8. “Whoever
defines the
code or the
context, has
control (…)
and all
answers which
accept that
context
abdicate the
possibility of
defining it.”
Theresa de
Lauretis
9. “Gender is a kind of imitation
for which there is no original.”
Judith Butler
10.
11. “Feet what do I need them for
If I have wings to fly.” Frida
Khalo
12.
13. “To gaze implies more than to look at – it signifies a
psychological relationship of power, in which the
gazer is superior to the object of the gaze.” Jonathan
14.
15. "To photograph people is to violate them, by seeing
them as they never see themselves, by having
knowledge of them they can never have; it turns
people into objects that can be symbolically
possessed. Just as the camera is a sublimation of
the gun, to photograph someone is a sublimated
murder—a soft murder, appropriate to a sad,
frightened time.” (Susan Sontag)
16.
17. ‘All of the
stories would
have to be told
differently, the
future would be
incalculable,
the historical
forces would,
will change
hands, bodies;
another
thinking as yet
not thinkable
will transform
the functioning
of all society.’
18.
19. CREDITS
Film
Cinema Paradiso (1988)
Giuseppe Tornate
Alice Through the Looking
Glass (2016) James Bobin,
written by Linda Woolverton
Paris, Texas (1985) Wim
Wenders
The Pillow Book (1996) Peter
Greenaway
Volver (2006) Pedro
Almodovar
Melancholia (2011) Lars Von
Trier
Bridget Jones’s Dairy (2001)
Sharon Maguire
Photography
Sycorax unkown photographer
Mari Mahr
Richard Avedon
Francesca Woodman
Robert Frank
Anne Leibovitz
Sally Mann
Dina Goldstein
20. Films made by females I haven’t had time to show or talk about
(in no particular order):
Tomboy (2011) by Celine Sciamma
In Darkness (2011) by Agnieszka Holland
Lost in Translation (2003) by Sophia Coppola
Frida (2002) by Julie Taymor
The Weight of Water (2000) by Kathryn Bigelow
The Piano (1993) Jane Campion
The Black Balloon (2008) by Elissa Down
Selma (2014) by Ava DuVernay
Twilight (2008) by Catherine Hardwicke
Fish Tank (2009) by Andrea Arnold
Vanity Fair (2004) by Mira Noir
Orlando (1992) by Sally Potter
Frozen (2013) by Jennifer Lee
Shrek (2001) by Vicky Jenson
The Wolfpack (2015) by Crystal Moselle
My 20th Century (1998) by Ildiko Enyedi
The Prince of Tides (1991) by Barbara Streisand
21. Theorists
Baudrillard
Joy Brooke Fairfield
Virginia Wolf
Theresa de Lauretis
Laura Mulvey
Jacques Lacan
Jonathan Schroeder
McLuhan
Barbara Dell Abate-Çelebi
Norman K. Denzin
Mary Boufis Filou
Anneke Smelik
Hélène Cixous
Frida Khalo
Susan Sontag
Editor's Notes
Who is telling the stories?
Who’s stories are being told?
How are the stories told?
And for whom?
Large and complex subject
No time to go into details, but we will touch on feminism, postmodern, semiotics.
I have been absolutely subjective about my choices for a reason. I want to provoke you, make you question what is and make you think about what could be.
“Sycorax is described as inhumanly powerful, with control over the moon and tides. Her fecundity and connection to lunar cycles link her with archetypal female sources of power. But her version of femininity is far from the dainty European femininity embodied in the young Miranda. Described as a hag "bent into a hoop," her gender identity is illegible and monstrous. This illegibility is present in her race as well. A Northern African with “blue eyes,” she is an exile and a mixed subject who ascends to ruler of her own small realm. The prefix “syco” is related to the Greek word for “fig,” which was slang for vagina. “Ax” relates to the term “axis” or “axial,” invoking a center around which something turns. Before the arrival of Prospero and his daughter, the island of Sycorax and her son did, in fact, revolve around the axis of female power. Prospero, an embodiment of masculine European rationality whose magical powers derive from his books and spells alone, was only able to "prosper" on the isle in the vacuum of her absence.” (http://joybrookefairfield.blogspot.com.au/2011/01/dreams-of-invisible-sycorax.html)
“Postmodernism is defined by the following terms: a nostalgic, conservative longing for the past, coupled with an erasure of boundaries between the past and the present; an intense preoccupation with the real and its representations; a pornography of the visible; the commodification of sexuality and desire; a consumer culture which objectifies a set of masculine cultural ideals; intense emotional experiences shaped by anxiety, alienation, resentment, and a detachment from others.” Baudrillard
It’s like chess…
Game theory, whos’ rules are we playing by?
Are there any rules?
Or are the rules constantly challenged and broken?
It is 2016, but the argument is still the same:
Are men defining the rules and woman have to obey and bend them?
Is there a constant MANSPLAINING, where men interrupt, question, silence women?
When it comes to the screen, do women have their voice?
https://books.google.com.au/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OTz_fUNh0awC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=feminist+representation+in+cinema&ots=2uU1ekL6wc&sig=S7CwP4BT7J9DqQkd8pEz-jnYBlc#v=onepage&q=feminist%20representation%20in%20cinema&f=false
Feminism and the postmodern stem from the same root, they both grew out from the same frustration of the society and although we can argue that we passed those movements, they are still here, having a huge effect on the visual language and the way we make films.
Feminism: equality
Post-feminism: recognizing the differences between the genders and integrating them into the society as a norm.
Lacan The Mirror Image Theory - fragmented reality
http://www.lacanonline.com/index/2010/09/what-does-lacan-say-about-the-mirror-stage-part-i/
“The child sees its image as a whole, but this contrasts with the lack of coordination of the body, leading the child to perceive a fragmented body. This contrast, Lacan hypothesized, is first felt by the infant as a rivalry with its own image, because the wholeness of the image threatens it with fragmentation; thus the mirror stage gives rise to an aggressive tension between the subject and the image. To resolve this aggressive tension, the subject identifies with the image: this primary identification with the counterpart is what forms the Ego.”
“The Ego is the product of misunderstanding – a false recognition”
Lancan argues that the image represented is fragmented and that the viewer identifies with this fragmented image.
Based on that, how much responsibility do we bare as filmmakers?
Laura Mulvey Male Gaze
Sexual objects – Male gaze Laura Mulvey
The man controls the film phantasy and also emerges
as the representative of power in a further sense: as the bearer of the look of the
spectator, transferring it behind the screen to neutralize the extra-diegetic tenden-
cies represented by woman as spectacle. This is made possible through the processes
set in motion by structuring the film around a main controlling figure with whom
the spectator can identify. As the spectator identifies with the main male protagonist,
he projects his look on to that of his like, his screen surrogate, so that the power
of the male protagonist as he controls events coincides with the active power of
the erotic look, both giving a satisfying sense of omnipotence.
“There are three different
looks associated with cinema: that of the camera as it records the profilmic event,
that of the audience as it watches the final product, and that of the characters at each
other within the screen illusion.” Mulvey
The main idea that seems to bring these actions together is that "looking" is generally seen as an active male role while the passive role of being looked at is immediately adopted as a female characteristic. It is under the construction of patriarchy that Mulvey argues that women in film are tied to desire and that female characters hold an "appearance coded for strong visual and erotic impact". The female actor is never meant to represent a character that directly effects the outcome of a plot or keep the story line going, but is inserted into the film as a way of supporting the male role and "bearing the burden of sexual objectification" that he cannot
I would like to bring this further. I believe that to have a MALE GAZE, one doesn't’ need to be a man. The major issue in my opinion is, that the audience is being conditioned (despite their sex), to look at the screen with the male gaze. The question is, if we can change that and how.
https://we.riseup.net/assets/102142/appadurai.pdf#page=381
Volver – to return, to come back or to become
I am using this analogue, because I think that the way women have been presented in the last 100 years on screen has to die in a way. It needs to be transformed by men and women changing the paradigm together. As Feminism is not a women thing. As the post-feminists say, we have to acknowledge the differences and embrace them. The point is, that no one should be discriminated, silenced, left out or abused based on gender.
“The present task of woman’s cinema may be not the destruction of narrative and visual pleasure, but rather the construction of another frame reference, one in which the measure of desire is no longer just the male subject. For what is finally at stake is not so much how “to make visible the invisible” as how to produce the conditions of visibility for a different social subject” Teresa de Lauretis
I had to narrow down a long list of films I wanted to show. I had an equally long list of films made by man and women.
Yet I mainly showed those made by man.
The reason?
I hardly could find the films by females on Youtube.
2. I wanted to point out that they are many films and filmmakers, who abounded the male gaze and found a way, a voice that levels the field.