SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
Mexico Industrial
Water and
Wastewater Issues
Vincent Lencioni
WEFTEC, September 2015
Chicago, Illinois
Presentation Outline
 I. Influent and Reuse Focuses
 Influent Issues – Prices, Water Quality Issues
 Reuse Issues – Drivers, Priority Areas
 II. General Wastewater Issues
 Regulations & Standards – General, vs US
 State Treatment & Water Quality Issues
 III. Industrial Wastewater Issues
 Treatment, Plant # & Types, Priority Sectors,
Opportunities, Mexico Business Tips
I. Industrial Source Water Issues
 Major Industrial Water Users
 Total: 3,338 hectars/m3
 55%: Veracruz (VC), QR,
Jalisco, Mexico State
 Water Source Issues
 Surface: BC, VC, Sinaloa,
Michoacan, Tamaulipas,
Tabasco, Morelos (50/50)
 Well Water > 75% states
 90% of total industrial use
 Quality Concerns: Mg, Ca
(hardness), Silica, Salts
 In General, with RO systems
 Industrial Prices
 2009 Domestic and
Industrial Price Info
 Industrial Well Water
 Conagua – 4 zones
Well: $.10 to 1.50 US
Surface: $.10 to $1 US
 Real Water Situation
 Well access insufficient
 Treated Water: Cost to
mfg: $.25, price: $1.50
 Municipal – High: $2.25
I. Water Prices, Top 6 Cities
Pesos per m3, 2014 Exchange Rate: 13 Pesos to 1 USD
I. Mexican Domestic & Industrial
Water Prices: 2009 vs Today
2009 Average Exchange Rate: 13 pesos to 1 USD
I. Industrial Water Reuse Issues
 Types of Reuse
 For Process: ZLD
 For Other Uses
 Drivers
 Water Scarcity
 Water Cost
 Water Quality Issues
 wells, quality needed
 Conagua restrictions
 Corporate Culture
 Priority Areas
 Sectors – Petrochem,
Automotive, Paper,
Commercial, Metals,
F&B, Cooling Towers
 Regions – Northern
states, some Central
states, high water
treatment states,
industrial areas.
II. General Wastewater Issues
II. Water & Wastewater Regulations
 Wastewater Regulations
 By where water goes:
 NOM 001: Federal bodies
 Rivers, Lakes, Coasts
 TSS 75, BOD 75
 NOM 002: Municipal
 Sewer/Drainage System
 By Reuse Applications
 NOM 003 = Water Reuse
 Indirect: TSS & BOD 30
 Direct: TSS & BOD 20
 NOM 004 = Sludge/Mud
 Fees for wastewater
discharge
 Article 277-B Ley Federal
de Derechos
 Trimester discharge volumes x
factor according to industrial
activity and discharge location.
 $.85 to 1.90 per m3
 Potable Regulations
 NOM 127
 Often specified for
reuse project apps
 TDS = 1000
II. NOM 001:
Discharges into Federal Bodies
M.A. = Monthly Average; D.A. = Daily Average
(1) Instantaneous
(2) Simple sample weighted average
(3) Absent as per the Test Method defined in the NMX-AA-006.
II. NOM 001 (continued)
(*) Measured in full.
D.A. = Daily Average M.A.= Monthly Average NA = Not applicable
(A) (B) and (C): Receiving Body type according to Government Service Charges
Law.
II. Wastewater Standards:II. Wastewater Standards:
US vs MexicoUS vs Mexico
 Significant differences between systems:
Standards Levels & Materials Tested
 Basis for Analysis: BOD and TSS
 Others: Not regularly monitored or required
Labs: Samplying frequencies, sample control
Metering Realities
Viable Regulations & Enforcement
 Local vs State vs Federal
Fines, Civil & Penal Liabilities, Closures
 Increasing and improviing but still insufficient
II. State Treatment Good & Bad:
% Treatment & Reuse Tendencies
 Good: 10 States (> 2/3)
 85-100%: Nuevo Leon, Baja
California, Aguascalientes,
Nayarit, Tamaulipas
 80-65%: Guerrero, Sinaloa,
Durango, Chihuahua, BCS
 Average (40-65%)
 50-65%: SLP, QR, Colima,
Guanajuato, Tlaxcala
 40-50%: Coahuila, Puebla,
Queretaro,Jalisco*,Sonora,
Veracruz, Oaxaca
 Bad: < 30% treatment
 < 10%: Yucatan,
Campeche, Hidalgo
 14% Mexico City*
 20-25%: Zacatecas,
Tabasco, Chiapas
 25-30% Mexico State,
Michoacah, Morelos
 New, Large Plants
coming on-line
 DF/Mexico State (20-40%)
 Jalisco (27-48%)
III. Industrial Wastewater Issues
III. Industrial Wastewater Treated
Industrial Wastewater Flow - from 64.5 (97) to 190 (2010) to 210m3/s.
Treated Flow - from 5.3 (9% of flow) to 36.7 (19%) to 60.7m3/s (29%)
BOD Treatment: from 8% (97) to 19% (2010) to 13% – Not good sign
III. % Wastewater Treated…..
Past Conagua goals: 2012: 60% total treatment; 2015: 100% water reuse;
2025: all muni/industrial wastewater treated; Current Goals: very general
III.Industrial Plants by State 2010
Focus should begin to switch from refurbishing current to new plants
- Operating Capacity 2010: 50% - Installed 72m3/s; Treated 36.7m3/s
- Operating Capacity 2014: 81% - Installed 75m3/s; Treated 60.7m3/s
III. 2010-2013 State Industrial
Plant Evolution & Growth
 Increases
 Plants (up 450)
 Sonora 210, NL 90,
Campeche 80, Jalisco
35, Guanajuato 90,
Puebla 76, Yucatan 50,
Tamps 45
 Treated Flows (37m3/s)
 Sonora 9m3/s, Tamps 5m3/s,
BCS 5m3/s, Michoacan
3m3s
 7 States = 50% Plants
 Guanajuato, Mexico, NL,
Puebla, Queretaro, Sonora,
Veracruz
 Plants Decreases
 BC 11, SLP 31, Tlax 30
 DF from 200 to 5
 Mexico from 315 to 241
 Treated Flows (m3/s)
 Puebla, Hidalgo,Mexico
III. Industrial Plants by Type
(2010 vs 2013)
Industrial Plants: 2186 vs 2617 (Up 20%)
 Primary: 731 (33.4%) to 839 (32%) = 21.8m3/s
 Adjusting PH levels & removing TSS > .1mm
 > 50% in Veracruz & Chiapas: Basic Treatment
 Secondary: 1193 (54.6%) to 1555 (59.4%) = 34.8m3/s
 Removing colloidal & dissolved organic materials
 57% in 4 states: Mexico, Veracruz, N.L., Hidalgo
 Tertiary: 88 (4%) to 74 (2.8%) = 1.2m3/s – Too Low ??????
 Removing dissolved materials, metals, reuse driven
 With renewed reuse focus, #, decrease, flow seem odd
 Other: 174 (8%) to 149 (5.7%) = 3m3/s
 Some if not most probably with some kind of reuse or tertiary-like focus
III. Municipal Plants by Type
2010 Plants - Decreases: Activated Sludge: 46%, Ponds: 24%, Advanced Primary 11%
III. Industrial Sector PrioritiesSector Priorities
Top Priorities, heaviest
polluters
High Frequency & Flow Priorities
1. Food & Beverage – Growth
with influent water and
wastewater treatment reuse
1. Chemicals / Pharmaceuticals –
moderately strong sector with influent water
quality issues and discharge concerns
2. Metalworking / Automotive
Large & Growing, Tier 1 & 2
issues, OEM compliant
2. Textile / Clothing / Leather – many medium
& small producers who are not compliant
3. Paper - Highly regulated,
Improved mfging processes,
maintenance tendencies
3. Petroleum / Petrochemical (Pemex) – hope
for significant work in wastewater, oil prices
and Pemex problems slowing growth
4. Sugar – Requires regular,
on-going investments, but
spending questionable
4. MicroElectronics – relatively small but
growing sector with significant influent water
quality and effluent discharge concerns
III. Industrial Wastewater
Opportunities
- Industrial – Strength of 2015 Economy
- 500,000 mfging companies discharging, 15,000 large companies
- Types of Plants & Technologies – Influent & Effluent
- Still conventional demand with strong secondary treatment focuses
- Membranes over Conventional: MF & UF growing along with reuse growth
- Commercial & Infrastructure (Wastewater, Reuse, Desal )
- Resorts, Residential, Hotels, Restaurants, Golf Courses – 100+ plants year
- Real Estate Development has been down, construction bounce back?
- Macro Wastewater Treatment and resale: Muni, Industrial parks
- Industry Water Reuse & Savings Emphasis
- Reuse: 5 billion m3 a year, 75% muni vs 25% industrial; 10% of wastewater
- Industrial water prices rising, access limits in Northern Mexico
- Pre-use/Influent Treatment vs Reuse vs Discharge
- Pre-use & Reuse = clearer need/demand; Discharge = enforcement driven
III. Tips for Mexico Opportunities
 Good Market for Imported, US Goods
 Water Sector: 70% Imported, 2/3 from the US
 Many if not most filtration/membrane needs come from abroad
 Selling through local distributors and integrators
 Importance for relationship sales, service
 Need for local interaction, supervision, support
 Bring financing/credit plan
 Can enter market without but will struggle vs will thrive with
 Identify and follow regional indicators?
 Problem areas, scarcity, enforcement factors
 Key factors in selling filtration systems
 Pilot systems, pre-chemistry analysis, integrator proactivity
 Interaction with clients vs local intermediaries defining targets
Contact Information
 Vince Lencioni, Porex Corporation
Latin America Sales Manager
 Atizapan, State of Mexico, Mexico
 T. 011 52 555 378-3890
 Vince.lencioni@porex.com
 Business Cards: To Receive Presentation

More Related Content

Similar to WEFTEC - Mexico Industrial Water & Wastewater Presentation (2015, Final Version)

Point Source Water Pollution
Point Source Water PollutionPoint Source Water Pollution
Point Source Water Pollution
Courtney Hayden
 
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation SlidesWater Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam
 
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
Phil Bresee
 
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation SlidesNatural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
SlideTeam
 

Similar to WEFTEC - Mexico Industrial Water & Wastewater Presentation (2015, Final Version) (20)

Wisconsin Water Presentation (May 2011 Final)
Wisconsin Water Presentation (May 2011   Final)Wisconsin Water Presentation (May 2011   Final)
Wisconsin Water Presentation (May 2011 Final)
 
Mexico Presentation At WWEMA (April 21, 2011)
Mexico Presentation At WWEMA (April 21, 2011)Mexico Presentation At WWEMA (April 21, 2011)
Mexico Presentation At WWEMA (April 21, 2011)
 
Mexicopresentationatwwemaapril212011 13125734424684-phpapp02-110805144547-php...
Mexicopresentationatwwemaapril212011 13125734424684-phpapp02-110805144547-php...Mexicopresentationatwwemaapril212011 13125734424684-phpapp02-110805144547-php...
Mexicopresentationatwwemaapril212011 13125734424684-phpapp02-110805144547-php...
 
Small reservoirs: hot spot of scattered resources in the Volta basin
Small reservoirs: hot spot of scattered resources in the Volta basinSmall reservoirs: hot spot of scattered resources in the Volta basin
Small reservoirs: hot spot of scattered resources in the Volta basin
 
Water Quality Assessment Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Water Quality Assessment Powerpoint Presentation SlidesWater Quality Assessment Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Water Quality Assessment Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
L 1 introduction
L 1 introductionL 1 introduction
L 1 introduction
 
Sustainable Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Sustainable Water Management Powerpoint Presentation SlidesSustainable Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Sustainable Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Joanna
JoannaJoanna
Joanna
 
Olivier amiot reverse_osmosis
Olivier amiot reverse_osmosisOlivier amiot reverse_osmosis
Olivier amiot reverse_osmosis
 
Water Quality Monitoring Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Water Quality Monitoring Management Powerpoint Presentation SlidesWater Quality Monitoring Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Water Quality Monitoring Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Land And Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Land And Water Management Powerpoint Presentation SlidesLand And Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Land And Water Management Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
MEDC: Remediation and Redevelopment Division
MEDC: Remediation and Redevelopment DivisionMEDC: Remediation and Redevelopment Division
MEDC: Remediation and Redevelopment Division
 
Point Source Water Pollution
Point Source Water PollutionPoint Source Water Pollution
Point Source Water Pollution
 
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation SlidesWater Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Water Sector Analysis PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
Nerd nite philly recycling pbresee sept 2013 version 2
 
Ch-5 water demand management.pptx
Ch-5 water demand management.pptxCh-5 water demand management.pptx
Ch-5 water demand management.pptx
 
ENE3 - Regulatory framework of nutrient and resource recovery and valorizatio...
ENE3 - Regulatory framework of nutrient and resource recovery and valorizatio...ENE3 - Regulatory framework of nutrient and resource recovery and valorizatio...
ENE3 - Regulatory framework of nutrient and resource recovery and valorizatio...
 
Waste water management
Waste water managementWaste water management
Waste water management
 
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation SlidesNatural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Natural Resource Management Of Water Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 
Magdy Salah El-Dein • 2017 IFPRI Egypt Seminar in partnership with WorldFish:...
Magdy Salah El-Dein • 2017 IFPRI Egypt Seminar in partnership with WorldFish:...Magdy Salah El-Dein • 2017 IFPRI Egypt Seminar in partnership with WorldFish:...
Magdy Salah El-Dein • 2017 IFPRI Egypt Seminar in partnership with WorldFish:...
 

WEFTEC - Mexico Industrial Water & Wastewater Presentation (2015, Final Version)

  • 1. Mexico Industrial Water and Wastewater Issues Vincent Lencioni WEFTEC, September 2015 Chicago, Illinois
  • 2. Presentation Outline  I. Influent and Reuse Focuses  Influent Issues – Prices, Water Quality Issues  Reuse Issues – Drivers, Priority Areas  II. General Wastewater Issues  Regulations & Standards – General, vs US  State Treatment & Water Quality Issues  III. Industrial Wastewater Issues  Treatment, Plant # & Types, Priority Sectors, Opportunities, Mexico Business Tips
  • 3. I. Industrial Source Water Issues  Major Industrial Water Users  Total: 3,338 hectars/m3  55%: Veracruz (VC), QR, Jalisco, Mexico State  Water Source Issues  Surface: BC, VC, Sinaloa, Michoacan, Tamaulipas, Tabasco, Morelos (50/50)  Well Water > 75% states  90% of total industrial use  Quality Concerns: Mg, Ca (hardness), Silica, Salts  In General, with RO systems  Industrial Prices  2009 Domestic and Industrial Price Info  Industrial Well Water  Conagua – 4 zones Well: $.10 to 1.50 US Surface: $.10 to $1 US  Real Water Situation  Well access insufficient  Treated Water: Cost to mfg: $.25, price: $1.50  Municipal – High: $2.25
  • 4. I. Water Prices, Top 6 Cities Pesos per m3, 2014 Exchange Rate: 13 Pesos to 1 USD
  • 5. I. Mexican Domestic & Industrial Water Prices: 2009 vs Today 2009 Average Exchange Rate: 13 pesos to 1 USD
  • 6. I. Industrial Water Reuse Issues  Types of Reuse  For Process: ZLD  For Other Uses  Drivers  Water Scarcity  Water Cost  Water Quality Issues  wells, quality needed  Conagua restrictions  Corporate Culture  Priority Areas  Sectors – Petrochem, Automotive, Paper, Commercial, Metals, F&B, Cooling Towers  Regions – Northern states, some Central states, high water treatment states, industrial areas.
  • 8. II. Water & Wastewater Regulations  Wastewater Regulations  By where water goes:  NOM 001: Federal bodies  Rivers, Lakes, Coasts  TSS 75, BOD 75  NOM 002: Municipal  Sewer/Drainage System  By Reuse Applications  NOM 003 = Water Reuse  Indirect: TSS & BOD 30  Direct: TSS & BOD 20  NOM 004 = Sludge/Mud  Fees for wastewater discharge  Article 277-B Ley Federal de Derechos  Trimester discharge volumes x factor according to industrial activity and discharge location.  $.85 to 1.90 per m3  Potable Regulations  NOM 127  Often specified for reuse project apps  TDS = 1000
  • 9. II. NOM 001: Discharges into Federal Bodies M.A. = Monthly Average; D.A. = Daily Average (1) Instantaneous (2) Simple sample weighted average (3) Absent as per the Test Method defined in the NMX-AA-006.
  • 10. II. NOM 001 (continued) (*) Measured in full. D.A. = Daily Average M.A.= Monthly Average NA = Not applicable (A) (B) and (C): Receiving Body type according to Government Service Charges Law.
  • 11. II. Wastewater Standards:II. Wastewater Standards: US vs MexicoUS vs Mexico  Significant differences between systems: Standards Levels & Materials Tested  Basis for Analysis: BOD and TSS  Others: Not regularly monitored or required Labs: Samplying frequencies, sample control Metering Realities Viable Regulations & Enforcement  Local vs State vs Federal Fines, Civil & Penal Liabilities, Closures  Increasing and improviing but still insufficient
  • 12. II. State Treatment Good & Bad: % Treatment & Reuse Tendencies  Good: 10 States (> 2/3)  85-100%: Nuevo Leon, Baja California, Aguascalientes, Nayarit, Tamaulipas  80-65%: Guerrero, Sinaloa, Durango, Chihuahua, BCS  Average (40-65%)  50-65%: SLP, QR, Colima, Guanajuato, Tlaxcala  40-50%: Coahuila, Puebla, Queretaro,Jalisco*,Sonora, Veracruz, Oaxaca  Bad: < 30% treatment  < 10%: Yucatan, Campeche, Hidalgo  14% Mexico City*  20-25%: Zacatecas, Tabasco, Chiapas  25-30% Mexico State, Michoacah, Morelos  New, Large Plants coming on-line  DF/Mexico State (20-40%)  Jalisco (27-48%)
  • 14. III. Industrial Wastewater Treated Industrial Wastewater Flow - from 64.5 (97) to 190 (2010) to 210m3/s. Treated Flow - from 5.3 (9% of flow) to 36.7 (19%) to 60.7m3/s (29%) BOD Treatment: from 8% (97) to 19% (2010) to 13% – Not good sign
  • 15. III. % Wastewater Treated….. Past Conagua goals: 2012: 60% total treatment; 2015: 100% water reuse; 2025: all muni/industrial wastewater treated; Current Goals: very general
  • 16. III.Industrial Plants by State 2010 Focus should begin to switch from refurbishing current to new plants - Operating Capacity 2010: 50% - Installed 72m3/s; Treated 36.7m3/s - Operating Capacity 2014: 81% - Installed 75m3/s; Treated 60.7m3/s
  • 17. III. 2010-2013 State Industrial Plant Evolution & Growth  Increases  Plants (up 450)  Sonora 210, NL 90, Campeche 80, Jalisco 35, Guanajuato 90, Puebla 76, Yucatan 50, Tamps 45  Treated Flows (37m3/s)  Sonora 9m3/s, Tamps 5m3/s, BCS 5m3/s, Michoacan 3m3s  7 States = 50% Plants  Guanajuato, Mexico, NL, Puebla, Queretaro, Sonora, Veracruz  Plants Decreases  BC 11, SLP 31, Tlax 30  DF from 200 to 5  Mexico from 315 to 241  Treated Flows (m3/s)  Puebla, Hidalgo,Mexico
  • 18. III. Industrial Plants by Type (2010 vs 2013) Industrial Plants: 2186 vs 2617 (Up 20%)  Primary: 731 (33.4%) to 839 (32%) = 21.8m3/s  Adjusting PH levels & removing TSS > .1mm  > 50% in Veracruz & Chiapas: Basic Treatment  Secondary: 1193 (54.6%) to 1555 (59.4%) = 34.8m3/s  Removing colloidal & dissolved organic materials  57% in 4 states: Mexico, Veracruz, N.L., Hidalgo  Tertiary: 88 (4%) to 74 (2.8%) = 1.2m3/s – Too Low ??????  Removing dissolved materials, metals, reuse driven  With renewed reuse focus, #, decrease, flow seem odd  Other: 174 (8%) to 149 (5.7%) = 3m3/s  Some if not most probably with some kind of reuse or tertiary-like focus
  • 19. III. Municipal Plants by Type 2010 Plants - Decreases: Activated Sludge: 46%, Ponds: 24%, Advanced Primary 11%
  • 20. III. Industrial Sector PrioritiesSector Priorities Top Priorities, heaviest polluters High Frequency & Flow Priorities 1. Food & Beverage – Growth with influent water and wastewater treatment reuse 1. Chemicals / Pharmaceuticals – moderately strong sector with influent water quality issues and discharge concerns 2. Metalworking / Automotive Large & Growing, Tier 1 & 2 issues, OEM compliant 2. Textile / Clothing / Leather – many medium & small producers who are not compliant 3. Paper - Highly regulated, Improved mfging processes, maintenance tendencies 3. Petroleum / Petrochemical (Pemex) – hope for significant work in wastewater, oil prices and Pemex problems slowing growth 4. Sugar – Requires regular, on-going investments, but spending questionable 4. MicroElectronics – relatively small but growing sector with significant influent water quality and effluent discharge concerns
  • 21. III. Industrial Wastewater Opportunities - Industrial – Strength of 2015 Economy - 500,000 mfging companies discharging, 15,000 large companies - Types of Plants & Technologies – Influent & Effluent - Still conventional demand with strong secondary treatment focuses - Membranes over Conventional: MF & UF growing along with reuse growth - Commercial & Infrastructure (Wastewater, Reuse, Desal ) - Resorts, Residential, Hotels, Restaurants, Golf Courses – 100+ plants year - Real Estate Development has been down, construction bounce back? - Macro Wastewater Treatment and resale: Muni, Industrial parks - Industry Water Reuse & Savings Emphasis - Reuse: 5 billion m3 a year, 75% muni vs 25% industrial; 10% of wastewater - Industrial water prices rising, access limits in Northern Mexico - Pre-use/Influent Treatment vs Reuse vs Discharge - Pre-use & Reuse = clearer need/demand; Discharge = enforcement driven
  • 22. III. Tips for Mexico Opportunities  Good Market for Imported, US Goods  Water Sector: 70% Imported, 2/3 from the US  Many if not most filtration/membrane needs come from abroad  Selling through local distributors and integrators  Importance for relationship sales, service  Need for local interaction, supervision, support  Bring financing/credit plan  Can enter market without but will struggle vs will thrive with  Identify and follow regional indicators?  Problem areas, scarcity, enforcement factors  Key factors in selling filtration systems  Pilot systems, pre-chemistry analysis, integrator proactivity  Interaction with clients vs local intermediaries defining targets
  • 23. Contact Information  Vince Lencioni, Porex Corporation Latin America Sales Manager  Atizapan, State of Mexico, Mexico  T. 011 52 555 378-3890  Vince.lencioni@porex.com  Business Cards: To Receive Presentation

Editor's Notes

  1. MG and hardness 4000, Silica 400 although normally closer to 100
  2. Municipal by Type: Activated Sludge 57%, Stabilizing &amp; Aerated Ponds 21%, Bio Filters 5%, Dual 5%, Advanced Primary 4%