SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 33
1
Navigating the Research Ethics Review Process
Based on the Lunch and Learn presentation
by Dr. Eleanor Gittens
Chair, Georgian College Research Ethics Board
Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2021
2
2
Agenda
1. Why Research Ethics?
2. Required Approvals
a) Permission for Access to Resources for Research
b) Research Ethics Approval
3. The Research Ethics Approval Process: From Start to Finish
4. Common Pitfalls and FAQs
3
3
Why Research Ethics?
1
4
4
Controversial Gene-Edited Baby Study:
Chinese Researcher, He Jiankui, 2018
Claimed to have successfully altered the genes of twin girls born to a HIV positive father
and HIV negative mother; editing out HIV
5
5
Ethical Issues of Informed
Consent
6
6
Why Research Ethics is Important
Ethics:
• Lays out what is legitimate and what is not
• Moral research procedures
• Balances: the pursuit of knowledge and the rights of
the research participants or others in society
• Professional obligation
7
7
The Standard
Canadian Institutes of Health
Research (CIHR)
Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada
(NSERC)
Social Sciences and Humanities
Research Council of Canada
(SSHRC)
Tri-Council Policy
Statement (TCPS2):
Ethical Conduct for
Research Involving
Humans
Note: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research
Council, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans,
December 2018 (TCPS, 2018)
8
8
Respect for Persons
Concern for Welfare
Justice
Guidelines of the TCPS2 are based on three
core principles
Source: TCPS 2, Article 1.1
9
9
Five additional guiding
principles
Modern research ethics has five additional
guiding principles
Cardinal principle
Respect for human
dignity based on
the selection and
achievement of
morally acceptable
ends and the
morally acceptable
means to those
ends.
What this principle
aspires to protect
The multiple and
interdependent interests
of the person—from
bodily to psychological to
cultural integrity.
1. Respect for Free and
Informed Consent
2. Respect for Vulnerable
Persons
3. Respect for Privacy and
Confidentiality
4. Respect for Justice and
Inclusiveness
5. Balancing Harms and
Benefits
10
10
Research activity can occur in two ways
Description
Course-based projects
• Research activity planned by a
professor as a course requirement
• Usually to enhance/apply course
and/or program learning
Independent projects
• Project led by a Principal Investigator
(PI) based on research
interests/expertise
• Independent of any course or program
• Faculty is the PI for all of the projects in
the course
• Faculty can be PI or collaborator
• PI could be a non-faculty member (e.g.,
admin staff, support staff, external)
Faculty
involvement
• Students conduct research under the
guidance of the professor
• Students may be engaged
Student
involvement
• Professor must follow the course-based
GCREB approval process
• Specific projects may need full ethics
approval based on deemed risk
• Level of ethics approval dependent on
deemed risk (proportionate review)
Ethics
approval
11
11
Required Approvals
2
12
12
Two (2) types of approval may be required
Permission for
Access to
Resources for
Research
Approval by
college
administrators
that enables
researchers to
access college
resources1
• If you wish to conduct research involving Georgian College participants
• If you wish to use the Georgian College name
• If you plan to use Georgian College facilities and/or resources
(equipment; supplied; etc.)
Research
Ethics Approval
Approval by
Georgian
College
Research Ethics
Board (GCREB)
to conduct
proposed
research
activities2
• Research involving human participants recruited from Georgian College.
• Research involving the use of the college's name in a contract bid or
proposal.
• College sponsorship of research through professor classroom release
time, sabbatical (study leave), or direct funding.
• Researchers accessing college facilities, resources, college employees,
machines, and other college services or resources, and where the college
administers a grant from an outside agency or individual.
• Data formally collected, through whatever means or methods, from
college students, faculty, administration, support staff, or other
members of the college community, or from any database containing
information about the aforementioned groups.
Description When this approval is needed
1. Georgian College Policy AD-016: Access to Georgian College Resources for Research
2. Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research
13
13
Permission for
Access to
Resources for
Research
a)
14
14
Why seek permission for access to resources
for research?
 Helps ensure appropriate access to participants and
resources before you get too far into the planning process
 Verifies that any sponsoring department(s) at Georgian
College are aware of your project
 Prevents conflicting activities at the institutional level
Similar permissions may also be required for access
to non-Georgian resources or sites.
PERMISSION FOR ACCESS TO RESOURCES FOR
RESEARCH is required BEFORE you seek ETHICS
APPROVAL.
15
15
How do I request permission for access to
resources for research at Georgian College?
1. Complete a Request for Permission for Access to Resources for Research
(RPARR) form.
2. If you are doing the research on behalf of Georgian College, have the
manager of the department for whom you are doing the research sign in
Section A.
3. Submit the RPARR form to the manager responsible for the most
significant resource for your research. This would be the participants if
they are Georgian College students, employees or contacts.
RPARR Path
Manager,
Sponsoring Dept.
(Section A)
Dean/
Assoc. Dean/
Manager/V.P./Pres.
(Section D)
Director,
Institutional
Research
(Section E)
Principal
Investigator
GCREB
(with ethics
application)
16
16
Research
Ethics
Approval
b)
17
17
Georgian College’s Research Ethics Board
(GCREB)
• Reviews the ethical acceptability of all research involving humans conducted
within Georgian College’s jurisdiction or under Georgian College’s auspices1,2 in
accordance with TCPS2.
What does the GCREB do?
• Membership is founded upon the principle that competent research ethics
review requires ethics expertise, multidisciplinary perspective, and REB
independence. GCREB has both Georgian employees and community members.
Who sits on the GCREB?
•The GCREB operates at arms’-length from the college.
•The REB Board Chair presided over the board for a two-year term, which can be
renewed no more than one time.
How is the GCREB governed?
1. By Georgian College faculty, staff, or students
2. Regardless of where the research is conducted
18
18
When ethics approval is required for research
being done by students
Research involving human participants planned by Georgian College
and Georgian College University Partnership Centre students when:
1. The intent of the research is to educate students on research
processes used to explore and expand existing theories and
conceptual knowledge,
2. Students compare new techniques, practices, programs with
standard approaches to determine which is more effective,
3. The results or findings are written in a format that would be
acceptable for a research journal or academic conference
presentation, or
4. Primary data are collected and organized for analysis and
distribution or dissemination.
Source: Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research
19
19
When ethics approval is NOT required (1/2)
E.g., Crowd traffic flow
study
Research involving the observation of people in public
places in which the individuals targeted for
observation have no reasonable expectation of
privacy; receive no intervention or direct contact from
the researcher; and cannot be identified in any
disseminated research results
E.g., Public databases;
internet searches; public
archives
Research about a living individual involved in the
public area or about an artist, based exclusively on
publicly available information
E.g., KPIs; satisfaction
surveys; event feedback;
some market research
Quality assurance and quality improvement studies,
program evaluation activities, and performance
reviews, or testing within normal educational
requirements when used exclusively by Georgian
College for assessment, management or improvement
purposes
20
20
When ethics approval is NOT required (2/2)
Use the information to provide advice, diagnosis, identification of
appropriate interventions, or general advice for a client;
Develop skills which are considered standard practice within a profession
(e.g. observation, assessment, intervention, evaluation, auditing);
Collect information as part of the normal relationship between a student
and the participants (e.g. classroom teacher and students, nurse and
patient, lawyer and client); or
Teach about the design, conduct and process of research using fictional or
previously deidentified practice data.
Georgian College student information gathering activities classified as skill
development and not research where the intent is to:
Sources: Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research and
TCPS, 2018.
21
21
How can I tell whether or not ethics approval
is required?
The ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool* can help determine the primary
purpose of your project, the types of ethical risks involved, and
whether or not it may be exempt from ethics review.
Save your screening tool results and RPARR form for consultation with
your instructor or the Chair of the GCREB.
Alberta Innovates. (2010). ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool.
Retrieved from aihealthsolutions.ca/arecci/screening/
If you have any doubts/questions, contact the Research Ethics Office for guidance:
reb@georgiancollege.ca
22
22
Proportionate approach to ethics review
Independent Research
Project
Course-based project1
Full GCREB Review Full GCREB Review
Research with approval
from another CIHR-,
NSERC- or SSHRC-
authorized REB, or the
Multi-College REB
Delegated review by an
individual or subgroup of
the GCREB
Delegated review by an
individual or subgroup of
the GCREB
Minimal risk
Delegated review by an
individual or subgroup of
the GCREB
Course instructor level
review of student projects
carried out within formal
course requirements
1. Professor must have authority from the GCREB to conduct course-based ethics review
23
23
What is “minimal risk research”?
Research participants drawn from the general adult population, capable of
giving free and informed consent, and may not include vulnerable (e.g.,
children; persons not legally competent to consent).
Capable participants
 Does not involve any personal, sensitive or incriminating topics or questions
which could place participants at risk
Questionable questions
 Does not manipulate behaviour of participants beyond the range of
“normal” classroom activity or daily life
Manipulation of behaviour
beyond the norm
 Does not involve physically invasive contact with the research participants
Physically invasive contact
 Does not involve deception of participants
Deception

Research in which the probability and magnitude of possible harms implied by participation in the
research are no greater than those encountered by participants in those aspects of their
everyday life that relate to the research
24
24
The Research Ethics Approval Process:
From Start to Finish
3
25
25
Ethics approval process takes time…make sure
you plan appropriately! Allow for a
minimum of…
2
Obtain
ethics
approval
3-8 weeks
Complete appropriate
application form from
GCREB website
Submit application(s)
with all attachments to
reb@georgiancollege.ca1
Submit any
requested
revisions to GCREB
3
Ongoing
ethics
review
Ongoing
Report any changes or adverse
events to GCREB immediately
If needed, submit a Research Ethics Board
Renewal form one month before ethics
approval expires
4
Closing
the file
Within 2
weeks of
completion
Submit a GCREB Final Report form for each project.
Instructors with course-based ethics authority must also submit a
Summary of Course-based Research form Part B upon the projects’
completion or within two weeks of final grade entry for the course.
Prepare 2-3 weeks
Plan
your
research
Complete the
TCPS2 CORE
certification
Read
applicable
policies
Become
familiar with
related privacy
legislation
Obtain
permission for
access to
resources
1
1. Instructors with course-based ethics authority must also submit a Summary of Course-based
Research form with the individual applications BEFORE recruitment or data collection may begin.
NO recruitment or data collection until final ethics approval or confirmation of exemption is obtained
26
26
Suggested process for courses in which the
instructors hold current GCREB authorization to
conduct course-based research ethics review
All students conducting research involving humans (as defined in the TCPS2)
must complete the TCPS2 CORE certification
GCREB action
Student action
Faculty action
Students submit RPARR
forms and/or other
requests for access
to Instructor
Instructor signs
RPARR as PI,
and students
seek approval signatures
for access to resources
Students submit
Applications for Research
Ethics Approval to
Instructor
Instructor reviews
applications for ethics
compliance and signs as PI
Instructor submits
ALL applications
and the
Summary of Course-based
Research (Part A)
to GCREB
GCREB reviews
applications involving
more than minimal risk
Projects with ethics
approval/exemption
begin*
Students complete
research
and submit
GCREB Final Report forms
to Instructor
Instructor submits
ALL Final Reports
and the
Summary of
Course-based
Research (Part B)
to GCREB
*Projects involving more than minimal risk must wait for final approval from GCREB.
27
27
Georgian College Policies
Research Policies1
• AD-016 Access to Georgian College Resources for Research
• AD-014 Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research
• AD-015 Research Integrity
Other Policies2
• 2-110 Temporary poster and semi-permanent graphic panel
posting procedure
• AD-004 Privacy
• AD-005 Email Appropriate Use and Anti-Spam Compliance
• 1-130 Intellectual Property
• 4-126 Conflict of Interest
• Health Information Privacy policies
1. Refer to the GCREB website or employee portal for the most recent versions.
2. Some of these policies are only accessible on the employee portal.
28
28
Resources1
• GCREB Website
• Panel on Research Ethics (Has TCPS2 interpretations)
• Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for
Research Involving Humans – TCPS 2 (2018)
• The TCPS 2 Tutorial: Course on Research Ethics (CORE)
(Required for ethics approval)
• Responsible and Ethical Conduct of College Research, a guide
• Responsible and Ethical Conduct of College Research, a tutorial
• IT Security
• ​​​​Access and Privacy Office​
• Marketing and Communications
• Accessibility
1. Some of these resources are only accessible on the employee portal.
29
29
Common Pitfalls
and
FAQ
4
30
30
Common Pitfalls
• Providing too much extraneous information instead
of the information needed to assess research ethics,
e.g. mixing the rationale, goals and methodology of
programming (e.g. class activity that would occur
anyway) into the rationale, research questions and
methodology of the research
• Not providing sufficient information about what is
required of participants or what will happen with the
data
31
31
FAQ
Q: What other research approvals might I need?
A: Other research locations, sponsors and institutions
may have their own requirements for administrative
approval (aka “institutional approval”) and/or ethics
approval.
Q: What if I want to do the research at other colleges?
A: For research projects being conducted at more than
one Ontario college, see the Ontario Colleges Multi-
college Ethics Review Process and use the Multi-college
application form.
32
32
FAQ
Q: When should I apply for research ethics approval?
A: Recommended lead time is at least two months
before you plan to commence the research.
Q: What format should I use for my application?
A: Email Word or PDF documents (NOT scanned
images) to reb@georgiancollege.ca . Attach TCPS2
CORE certificates, all recruitment and consent
documents, data collection tools, and scans of initial
and signature pages.
33
33
More questions?
•First, please check the website:
www.georgiancollege.ca/researchethicsboard
•Call Mary Whittaker at ext. 5395 or email
reb@georgiancollege.ca

More Related Content

Similar to GCREB-Navigating-the-Research-Ethics-Review-Process_v2.1.pptx

NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...UCLA CTSI
 
Research ethics overview for social science researchers
Research  ethics  overview for social science researchers Research  ethics  overview for social science researchers
Research ethics overview for social science researchers Sarah Quinton
 
Ethical issues in qualitative research
Ethical issues in qualitative researchEthical issues in qualitative research
Ethical issues in qualitative researchNeha Deo
 
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptx
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptxReview process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptx
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptxNamitaGhimire1
 
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...Ian Green
 
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptx
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptxROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptx
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptxE Poovarasan
 
Protocol Writing in Clinical Research
Protocol Writing in Clinical ResearchProtocol Writing in Clinical Research
Protocol Writing in Clinical ResearchClinosolIndia
 
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAs
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAsWriting the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAs
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
 
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate Students
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate StudentsSupervision Skills on Postgraduate Students
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate StudentsBC Chew
 
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAs
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsGrant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAs
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsUCLA CTSI
 
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docx
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docxCollege of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docx
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docxmccormicknadine86
 
Addressing ethics in clinical research
Addressing ethics in clinical research Addressing ethics in clinical research
Addressing ethics in clinical research Dr.MK Sudashan
 
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.EduSkills OECD
 
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Research
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting ResearchOu Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Research
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Researchanesah
 
Ethical review process, mk sharma
Ethical review process, mk sharmaEthical review process, mk sharma
Ethical review process, mk sharmaSHARDA UNIVERSITY
 

Similar to GCREB-Navigating-the-Research-Ethics-Review-Process_v2.1.pptx (20)

NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
NIH Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08 - K23 Applications and Individual Career De...
 
Research ethics overview for social science researchers
Research  ethics  overview for social science researchers Research  ethics  overview for social science researchers
Research ethics overview for social science researchers
 
Ethical issues in qualitative research
Ethical issues in qualitative researchEthical issues in qualitative research
Ethical issues in qualitative research
 
Responsible Conduct of Research: A Framework for Research Administrators and ...
Responsible Conduct of Research: A Framework for Research Administrators and ...Responsible Conduct of Research: A Framework for Research Administrators and ...
Responsible Conduct of Research: A Framework for Research Administrators and ...
 
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptx
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptxReview process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptx
Review process Ethics in Health Research workshop _eye 22 July 2023.pptx
 
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...
Joe Luca QPR2014 - Research training excellence in Australia: a good practice...
 
Research Ethics Basics
Research Ethics BasicsResearch Ethics Basics
Research Ethics Basics
 
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptx
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptxROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptx
ROLES AND RESPONSIBLITIES OF CLINICAL TRIAL PERSONNEL-INVESTIGATOR.pptx
 
Protocol Writing in Clinical Research
Protocol Writing in Clinical ResearchProtocol Writing in Clinical Research
Protocol Writing in Clinical Research
 
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAs
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAsWriting the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAs
Writing the NIH K Award (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications & Individual CDAs
 
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate Students
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate StudentsSupervision Skills on Postgraduate Students
Supervision Skills on Postgraduate Students
 
Mc Cord Hosptial Final Products Report August 2005 J Sheldon
Mc Cord Hosptial Final Products Report August 2005 J SheldonMc Cord Hosptial Final Products Report August 2005 J Sheldon
Mc Cord Hosptial Final Products Report August 2005 J Sheldon
 
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAs
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAsGrant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAs
Grant Proposals (SF 424): K08-K23 Applications and Individual CDAs
 
CHEPSAA final networking meeting: capacity assessments
CHEPSAA final networking meeting: capacity assessmentsCHEPSAA final networking meeting: capacity assessments
CHEPSAA final networking meeting: capacity assessments
 
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docx
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docxCollege of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docx
College of Arts and Social SciencesEthical Approval Form.docx
 
Addressing ethics in clinical research
Addressing ethics in clinical research Addressing ethics in clinical research
Addressing ethics in clinical research
 
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.
Effective Creation, Mediation and Use of Knowledge in and about Education.
 
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Research
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting ResearchOu Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Research
Ou Code Of Practice For Researchers And Those Conducting Research
 
Submitting a research proposal
Submitting a research proposalSubmitting a research proposal
Submitting a research proposal
 
Ethical review process, mk sharma
Ethical review process, mk sharmaEthical review process, mk sharma
Ethical review process, mk sharma
 

Recently uploaded

Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsMaria Levchenko
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerThousandEyes
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdfhans926745
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)wesley chun
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdflior mazor
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherRemote DBA Services
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfsudhanshuwaghmare1
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreternaman860154
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processorsdebabhi2
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptxHampshireHUG
 
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEarley Information Science
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfEnterprise Knowledge
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonAnna Loughnan Colquhoun
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonetsnaman860154
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024The Digital Insurer
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking MenDelhi Call girls
 
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?Antenna Manufacturer Coco
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProduct Anonymous
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsJoaquim Jorge
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed textsHandwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
Handwritten Text Recognition for manuscripts and early printed texts
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Civil Lines Women Seeking Men
 
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
[2024]Digital Global Overview Report 2024 Meltwater.pdf
 
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
Powerful Google developer tools for immediate impact! (2023-24 C)
 
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdfGenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
GenAI Risks & Security Meetup 01052024.pdf
 
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a FresherStrategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
Strategies for Landing an Oracle DBA Job as a Fresher
 
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdfBoost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
Boost Fertility New Invention Ups Success Rates.pdf
 
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreterPresentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
Presentation on how to chat with PDF using ChatGPT code interpreter
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
04-2024-HHUG-Sales-and-Marketing-Alignment.pptx
 
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptxEIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
EIS-Webinar-Prompt-Knowledge-Eng-2024-04-08.pptx
 
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdfThe Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
The Role of Taxonomy and Ontology in Semantic Layers - Heather Hedden.pdf
 
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt RobisonData Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
Data Cloud, More than a CDP by Matt Robison
 
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with NanonetsHow to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
How to convert PDF to text with Nanonets
 
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Partners Life - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
08448380779 Call Girls In Greater Kailash - I Women Seeking Men
 
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
 
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemkeProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
ProductAnonymous-April2024-WinProductDiscovery-MelissaKlemke
 
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and MythsArtificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
Artificial Intelligence: Facts and Myths
 

GCREB-Navigating-the-Research-Ethics-Review-Process_v2.1.pptx

  • 1. 1 Navigating the Research Ethics Review Process Based on the Lunch and Learn presentation by Dr. Eleanor Gittens Chair, Georgian College Research Ethics Board Wednesday, Jan. 27, 2021
  • 2. 2 2 Agenda 1. Why Research Ethics? 2. Required Approvals a) Permission for Access to Resources for Research b) Research Ethics Approval 3. The Research Ethics Approval Process: From Start to Finish 4. Common Pitfalls and FAQs
  • 4. 4 4 Controversial Gene-Edited Baby Study: Chinese Researcher, He Jiankui, 2018 Claimed to have successfully altered the genes of twin girls born to a HIV positive father and HIV negative mother; editing out HIV
  • 5. 5 5 Ethical Issues of Informed Consent
  • 6. 6 6 Why Research Ethics is Important Ethics: • Lays out what is legitimate and what is not • Moral research procedures • Balances: the pursuit of knowledge and the rights of the research participants or others in society • Professional obligation
  • 7. 7 7 The Standard Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS2): Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans Note: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, December 2018 (TCPS, 2018)
  • 8. 8 8 Respect for Persons Concern for Welfare Justice Guidelines of the TCPS2 are based on three core principles Source: TCPS 2, Article 1.1
  • 9. 9 9 Five additional guiding principles Modern research ethics has five additional guiding principles Cardinal principle Respect for human dignity based on the selection and achievement of morally acceptable ends and the morally acceptable means to those ends. What this principle aspires to protect The multiple and interdependent interests of the person—from bodily to psychological to cultural integrity. 1. Respect for Free and Informed Consent 2. Respect for Vulnerable Persons 3. Respect for Privacy and Confidentiality 4. Respect for Justice and Inclusiveness 5. Balancing Harms and Benefits
  • 10. 10 10 Research activity can occur in two ways Description Course-based projects • Research activity planned by a professor as a course requirement • Usually to enhance/apply course and/or program learning Independent projects • Project led by a Principal Investigator (PI) based on research interests/expertise • Independent of any course or program • Faculty is the PI for all of the projects in the course • Faculty can be PI or collaborator • PI could be a non-faculty member (e.g., admin staff, support staff, external) Faculty involvement • Students conduct research under the guidance of the professor • Students may be engaged Student involvement • Professor must follow the course-based GCREB approval process • Specific projects may need full ethics approval based on deemed risk • Level of ethics approval dependent on deemed risk (proportionate review) Ethics approval
  • 12. 12 12 Two (2) types of approval may be required Permission for Access to Resources for Research Approval by college administrators that enables researchers to access college resources1 • If you wish to conduct research involving Georgian College participants • If you wish to use the Georgian College name • If you plan to use Georgian College facilities and/or resources (equipment; supplied; etc.) Research Ethics Approval Approval by Georgian College Research Ethics Board (GCREB) to conduct proposed research activities2 • Research involving human participants recruited from Georgian College. • Research involving the use of the college's name in a contract bid or proposal. • College sponsorship of research through professor classroom release time, sabbatical (study leave), or direct funding. • Researchers accessing college facilities, resources, college employees, machines, and other college services or resources, and where the college administers a grant from an outside agency or individual. • Data formally collected, through whatever means or methods, from college students, faculty, administration, support staff, or other members of the college community, or from any database containing information about the aforementioned groups. Description When this approval is needed 1. Georgian College Policy AD-016: Access to Georgian College Resources for Research 2. Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research
  • 14. 14 14 Why seek permission for access to resources for research?  Helps ensure appropriate access to participants and resources before you get too far into the planning process  Verifies that any sponsoring department(s) at Georgian College are aware of your project  Prevents conflicting activities at the institutional level Similar permissions may also be required for access to non-Georgian resources or sites. PERMISSION FOR ACCESS TO RESOURCES FOR RESEARCH is required BEFORE you seek ETHICS APPROVAL.
  • 15. 15 15 How do I request permission for access to resources for research at Georgian College? 1. Complete a Request for Permission for Access to Resources for Research (RPARR) form. 2. If you are doing the research on behalf of Georgian College, have the manager of the department for whom you are doing the research sign in Section A. 3. Submit the RPARR form to the manager responsible for the most significant resource for your research. This would be the participants if they are Georgian College students, employees or contacts. RPARR Path Manager, Sponsoring Dept. (Section A) Dean/ Assoc. Dean/ Manager/V.P./Pres. (Section D) Director, Institutional Research (Section E) Principal Investigator GCREB (with ethics application)
  • 17. 17 17 Georgian College’s Research Ethics Board (GCREB) • Reviews the ethical acceptability of all research involving humans conducted within Georgian College’s jurisdiction or under Georgian College’s auspices1,2 in accordance with TCPS2. What does the GCREB do? • Membership is founded upon the principle that competent research ethics review requires ethics expertise, multidisciplinary perspective, and REB independence. GCREB has both Georgian employees and community members. Who sits on the GCREB? •The GCREB operates at arms’-length from the college. •The REB Board Chair presided over the board for a two-year term, which can be renewed no more than one time. How is the GCREB governed? 1. By Georgian College faculty, staff, or students 2. Regardless of where the research is conducted
  • 18. 18 18 When ethics approval is required for research being done by students Research involving human participants planned by Georgian College and Georgian College University Partnership Centre students when: 1. The intent of the research is to educate students on research processes used to explore and expand existing theories and conceptual knowledge, 2. Students compare new techniques, practices, programs with standard approaches to determine which is more effective, 3. The results or findings are written in a format that would be acceptable for a research journal or academic conference presentation, or 4. Primary data are collected and organized for analysis and distribution or dissemination. Source: Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research
  • 19. 19 19 When ethics approval is NOT required (1/2) E.g., Crowd traffic flow study Research involving the observation of people in public places in which the individuals targeted for observation have no reasonable expectation of privacy; receive no intervention or direct contact from the researcher; and cannot be identified in any disseminated research results E.g., Public databases; internet searches; public archives Research about a living individual involved in the public area or about an artist, based exclusively on publicly available information E.g., KPIs; satisfaction surveys; event feedback; some market research Quality assurance and quality improvement studies, program evaluation activities, and performance reviews, or testing within normal educational requirements when used exclusively by Georgian College for assessment, management or improvement purposes
  • 20. 20 20 When ethics approval is NOT required (2/2) Use the information to provide advice, diagnosis, identification of appropriate interventions, or general advice for a client; Develop skills which are considered standard practice within a profession (e.g. observation, assessment, intervention, evaluation, auditing); Collect information as part of the normal relationship between a student and the participants (e.g. classroom teacher and students, nurse and patient, lawyer and client); or Teach about the design, conduct and process of research using fictional or previously deidentified practice data. Georgian College student information gathering activities classified as skill development and not research where the intent is to: Sources: Georgian College Policy AD-014: Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research and TCPS, 2018.
  • 21. 21 21 How can I tell whether or not ethics approval is required? The ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool* can help determine the primary purpose of your project, the types of ethical risks involved, and whether or not it may be exempt from ethics review. Save your screening tool results and RPARR form for consultation with your instructor or the Chair of the GCREB. Alberta Innovates. (2010). ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool. Retrieved from aihealthsolutions.ca/arecci/screening/ If you have any doubts/questions, contact the Research Ethics Office for guidance: reb@georgiancollege.ca
  • 22. 22 22 Proportionate approach to ethics review Independent Research Project Course-based project1 Full GCREB Review Full GCREB Review Research with approval from another CIHR-, NSERC- or SSHRC- authorized REB, or the Multi-College REB Delegated review by an individual or subgroup of the GCREB Delegated review by an individual or subgroup of the GCREB Minimal risk Delegated review by an individual or subgroup of the GCREB Course instructor level review of student projects carried out within formal course requirements 1. Professor must have authority from the GCREB to conduct course-based ethics review
  • 23. 23 23 What is “minimal risk research”? Research participants drawn from the general adult population, capable of giving free and informed consent, and may not include vulnerable (e.g., children; persons not legally competent to consent). Capable participants  Does not involve any personal, sensitive or incriminating topics or questions which could place participants at risk Questionable questions  Does not manipulate behaviour of participants beyond the range of “normal” classroom activity or daily life Manipulation of behaviour beyond the norm  Does not involve physically invasive contact with the research participants Physically invasive contact  Does not involve deception of participants Deception  Research in which the probability and magnitude of possible harms implied by participation in the research are no greater than those encountered by participants in those aspects of their everyday life that relate to the research
  • 24. 24 24 The Research Ethics Approval Process: From Start to Finish 3
  • 25. 25 25 Ethics approval process takes time…make sure you plan appropriately! Allow for a minimum of… 2 Obtain ethics approval 3-8 weeks Complete appropriate application form from GCREB website Submit application(s) with all attachments to reb@georgiancollege.ca1 Submit any requested revisions to GCREB 3 Ongoing ethics review Ongoing Report any changes or adverse events to GCREB immediately If needed, submit a Research Ethics Board Renewal form one month before ethics approval expires 4 Closing the file Within 2 weeks of completion Submit a GCREB Final Report form for each project. Instructors with course-based ethics authority must also submit a Summary of Course-based Research form Part B upon the projects’ completion or within two weeks of final grade entry for the course. Prepare 2-3 weeks Plan your research Complete the TCPS2 CORE certification Read applicable policies Become familiar with related privacy legislation Obtain permission for access to resources 1 1. Instructors with course-based ethics authority must also submit a Summary of Course-based Research form with the individual applications BEFORE recruitment or data collection may begin. NO recruitment or data collection until final ethics approval or confirmation of exemption is obtained
  • 26. 26 26 Suggested process for courses in which the instructors hold current GCREB authorization to conduct course-based research ethics review All students conducting research involving humans (as defined in the TCPS2) must complete the TCPS2 CORE certification GCREB action Student action Faculty action Students submit RPARR forms and/or other requests for access to Instructor Instructor signs RPARR as PI, and students seek approval signatures for access to resources Students submit Applications for Research Ethics Approval to Instructor Instructor reviews applications for ethics compliance and signs as PI Instructor submits ALL applications and the Summary of Course-based Research (Part A) to GCREB GCREB reviews applications involving more than minimal risk Projects with ethics approval/exemption begin* Students complete research and submit GCREB Final Report forms to Instructor Instructor submits ALL Final Reports and the Summary of Course-based Research (Part B) to GCREB *Projects involving more than minimal risk must wait for final approval from GCREB.
  • 27. 27 27 Georgian College Policies Research Policies1 • AD-016 Access to Georgian College Resources for Research • AD-014 Responsible Practice and Ethics Review in Research • AD-015 Research Integrity Other Policies2 • 2-110 Temporary poster and semi-permanent graphic panel posting procedure • AD-004 Privacy • AD-005 Email Appropriate Use and Anti-Spam Compliance • 1-130 Intellectual Property • 4-126 Conflict of Interest • Health Information Privacy policies 1. Refer to the GCREB website or employee portal for the most recent versions. 2. Some of these policies are only accessible on the employee portal.
  • 28. 28 28 Resources1 • GCREB Website • Panel on Research Ethics (Has TCPS2 interpretations) • Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans – TCPS 2 (2018) • The TCPS 2 Tutorial: Course on Research Ethics (CORE) (Required for ethics approval) • Responsible and Ethical Conduct of College Research, a guide • Responsible and Ethical Conduct of College Research, a tutorial • IT Security • ​​​​Access and Privacy Office​ • Marketing and Communications • Accessibility 1. Some of these resources are only accessible on the employee portal.
  • 30. 30 30 Common Pitfalls • Providing too much extraneous information instead of the information needed to assess research ethics, e.g. mixing the rationale, goals and methodology of programming (e.g. class activity that would occur anyway) into the rationale, research questions and methodology of the research • Not providing sufficient information about what is required of participants or what will happen with the data
  • 31. 31 31 FAQ Q: What other research approvals might I need? A: Other research locations, sponsors and institutions may have their own requirements for administrative approval (aka “institutional approval”) and/or ethics approval. Q: What if I want to do the research at other colleges? A: For research projects being conducted at more than one Ontario college, see the Ontario Colleges Multi- college Ethics Review Process and use the Multi-college application form.
  • 32. 32 32 FAQ Q: When should I apply for research ethics approval? A: Recommended lead time is at least two months before you plan to commence the research. Q: What format should I use for my application? A: Email Word or PDF documents (NOT scanned images) to reb@georgiancollege.ca . Attach TCPS2 CORE certificates, all recruitment and consent documents, data collection tools, and scans of initial and signature pages.
  • 33. 33 33 More questions? •First, please check the website: www.georgiancollege.ca/researchethicsboard •Call Mary Whittaker at ext. 5395 or email reb@georgiancollege.ca

Editor's Notes

  1. Most people thinks of ethics as synonymous with morals used to distinguish between right and wrong Golden Oath Do unto others as you would have them do onto you Hippocratic Oath First of all, do no harm A Religious Creed 10 commandments e.g. thou shall not kill One might be tempted to assume that ethics are no more than common sense.  However, why then are there so many ethical disputes and issues in our society.
  2. Bad Blood Study aka Tuskegee Syphilis Study Vulnerable population Coercion - Free healthcare Not informed of their diagnosis Given placebos and ineffective toxic treatments Denied effective penicillin treatment even once widely available to the rest of the population 128 died Montreal LSD Brainwashing Study No informed consent Patients harmed through experimental drugs and treatment Stanford Prison Experiment Inexperienced researcher did not anticipate the effects “Guard” participants abused “Prisoner” participants for six days Participants not allowed to withdraw Controversial Gene-Edited Baby Study Chinese Researcher He Jiankui Announced in 2018 that he had successfully altered the genes of twin girls born in November of that year to prevent them from contracting HIV from their conceiving parents. A provincial government investigation ensued. They found that:  The ethical review papers were forged The researcher deliberately evaded supervision  Used technology of uncertain safety and effectiveness The researcher was pursing personal fame and used self-raised funds. Such gene-editing work is banned in most countries, including China.
  3. The informed-consent process should be one of meaningful information exchange between researchers and study participants. It is one of the responsibilities of research ethics committees to ensure appropriate informed consent.  Studies have been conducted the ethical issues of informed consent in various fields. Once such study by Adams et al. (2017) examined informed consent in malaria research proposals and found that: In the case of the studies that required informed consent 2/3 needed to improve their explanation of study procedures to participants 40% attracted comments on risk and discomfort, vulnerable status, and compensation Studies that involved vulnerable populations raised more issues than those that did not (Reference: https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12910-017-0210-0.pdf?site=bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com) Connect to the GC environment   
  4. Within this context, the standard has been established by the Tri-council agencies.
  5. Georgian College must comply with the TCPS2 in order to be eligible for funding from the Tri-council agencies.
  6. One of the most difficult questions to answer is whether or not a study constitutes research requiring ethics approval, or is it exempt. The ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool is a free online questionnaire that can assist in making this determination. When in doubt, submit an Application for Research Ethics Approval.
  7. For participants or data from a particular program or department, the approver is usually the associate dean or department manager. To invite a participant group that spans more than one department, the request may need to go to the vice president responsible for that group. This may depend on the topic of your research, e.g. academics, services or employment. The Director of Institutional Research provides final RPARR approval.
  8. GCREB operates at arms’ length to ensure there it is not influenced by the college.
  9. One of the most difficult questions to answer is whether or not a study constitutes research requiring ethics approval, or is it exempt. The ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool is a free online questionnaire that can assist in making this determination. When in doubt, submit an Application for Research Ethics Approval.
  10. Ethics approval is NOT required for Georgian College student information gathering activities classified as skill development and not research where the intent is to: Use the information to provide advice, diagnosis, identification of appropriate interventions, or general advice for a client; (nurse-patient; accountant-client) Develop skills which are considered standard practice within a profession (e.g. observation, assessment, intervention, evaluation, auditing); Collect information as part of the normal relationship between a student and the participants (e.g. classroom teacher and students, nurse and patient, lawyer and client); or Teach about the design, conduct and process of research using fictional or previously deidentified practice data.
  11. One of the most difficult questions to answer is whether or not a study constitutes research requiring ethics approval, or is it exempt. The ARECCI Ethics Screening Tool is a free online questionnaire that can assist in making this determination. When in doubt, submit an Application for Research Ethics Approval.
  12. Ethics approval is required before any recruitment or data collection may begin.
  13. Ethics approval is required, and applications and summary forms must be filed with GCREB, before any recruitment or data collection may begin.
  14. While the GCREB does need to understand a little bit about the programming, it should be a very brief paragraph in the rationale. Information provided in the application should contain the methodology of the RESEARCH, not the PROGRAMMING.