2. Causes of Ascites
CAUSES OF ASCITES* Percentage
Cirrhosis (with or without peritoneal infection) 85
Miscellaneous portal hypertension-related disorder
(including 5% with two causes)
8
Cardiac disease 3
Peritoneal carcinomatosis 2
Miscellaneous nonportal hypertensionârelated
disorders
2
*Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA, McHutchison JG. The serum-ascites
albumin gradient is superior to the exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites.
Ann Int Med. 1992 Aug 1;117(3):215-20.
3. DATA IN INDIA
*Mehra D, Thakur D, Sultania S, Chaturvedi A, Agarwal G, Kumar A. Etiology of ascites in adults living in
Rohilkhand region, India: A hospital-based study. IJAR. 2016;2(12):01-4.
Causes of Ascites* Percentage
Cirrhosis 60.79
Tuberculosis 15.69
Pancreatitis 7.84
Malignancy 5.88
Constrictive pericarditis 5.88
Nephrotic syndrome 3.92
4. DATA IN INDIA
Causes of Ascites* Percentage
Cirrhosis 60.7
Tuberculosis 13.0
Mixed Ascites 1.78
Malignancy 7.7
Cardiac 7.7
Renal 5.9
Scrub typhus 1.1
Inconclusive 3.5
*Kumar B, Sharma B, Raina S, Sharma N,
Gupta D, Mardi K. Etiology of ascites in adults
living in the Hills of Himachal Pradesh, India:
A hospital-based study. CHRISMED Journal of
Health and Research. 2016 Jan 1;3(1):41.
5. Pathophysiology of Ascites in the setting of Cirrhosis
Portal Hypertension Increased Nitric Oxide
Vasodilation
Increased symphathetic
activity,Renin,
Aldosterone
Overfill of Intravascular
volume
Ascites
Renal Sodium retention
Increase in the
hydrostatic
pressure within the
hepatic sinusoids
Transudation of fluid into the
peritoneal cavity
6. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY IN NON CIRRHOTIC ASCITES
⢠Peritoneal carcinomatosis appears to cause ascites through the production of
proteinaceous fluid by tumor cells lining the peritoneum. Extracellular fluid
enters the peritoneal cavity to re-establish oncotic balance.
⢠liver metastases - portal hypertension caused by stenosis or occlusion of
portal veins by tumor nodules or tumor emboli
⢠HCC- Underlying cirrhosis related portal hypertension, tumour induced portal
vein thrombosis or both
⢠Chylous ascites in patients with malignant lymphoma appears to be caused
by lymph node obstruction by tumor and rupture of chyle-containing
lymphatics.
⢠Tuberculosis-production of proteinaceous fluid, as in peritoneal
carcinomatosis.
⢠Biliary/Pancreatic ascites- leakage of pancreatic juice or bile into the
peritoneal cavity.
7. CLINICAL FEATURES FOR EVALUATION
⢠Ascites frequently develops during a patientâs first episode of decompensation of
alcoholic liver disease.
⢠Patients with a long history of stable cirrhosis and the sudden development of
ascites should be suspected of harbouring a hepatocellular carcinoma
⢠Malignancy-related ascites frequently is painful, whereas cirrhotic ascites usually
is not, unless bacterial peritonitis or alcoholic hepatitis is superimposed.
⢠SISTER MARY JOSEPH NODULE in umbilicus- Malignancy
⢠Tumors causing Malignant ascites --ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic and uterine;
extra-abdominal tumors originating from lymphoma, lung and breast*
⢠Cardiac Disease- Elevated JVP
⢠Collaterals in the back may indicate an obstruction of the inferior vena cava.
⢠Presence of enlarged lymph nodes may suggest tuberculosis or lymphoma.
*Sangisetty SL, Miner TJ. Malignant ascites: a review of prognostic factors,
pathophysiology and therapeutic measures. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Apr
27;4(4):87.
8. CLASSIFICATION OF ASCITES
⢠GRADE 1- Mild ascites only detectable by ultrasound
⢠GRADE 2- Moderate ascites evident by moderate symmetrical distension of
abdomen
⢠GRADE 3- Large or gross ascites with marked abdominal distension
⢠The ascites that recurs at least on three occasions within a 12-month period
despite dietary sodium restriction and adequate diuretic dosage is defined as
recidivant*
*Arroyo V, Ginès P, Gerbes AL, Dudley FJ, Gentilini P, Laffi G, Reynolds TB,
RingâLarsen H, SchĂślmerich J. Definition and diagnostic criteria of refractory ascites
and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. Hepat. 1996 Jan;23(1):164-76.
9. Abdominal Paracentasis
⢠A diagnostic paracentesis should be performed in all patients with new onset grade 2 or
3 ascites, and in all patients hospitalized for worsening of ascites or any complication of
cirrhosis (Level A1).*
⢠Contraindications of Paracentasis: Coagulopathy should preclude paracentesis only when
there is clinically evident hyperfibrinolysis (three-dimensional ecchymosis/hematoma) or
clinically evident disseminated intravascular coagulation.**
⢠Other Contraindications:-
1. Pregnancy
2. Abdominal skin infection at the proposed puncture site
3. Severe Bowel distension
4. Uncooperative patient
*Angeli P, Bernardi M, Villanueva C, Francoz C, Mookerjee RP, Trebicka J, Krag A, Laleman W, Gines P. EASL
Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018 Apr.
**Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to
cirrhosis: update 2012. Hepatology. 2013 Feb;57(4):1651-3.
10. ASCITIC FLUID ANALYSIS
GROSS APPEARANCE: This can range from water-clear to frankly purulent, bloody,
or chylous.
⢠The opacity of many cloudy ascitic fluid specimens is caused by neutrophils.
⢠Fluid with an absolute neutrophil count less than 1000/mm3 may be nearly clear.
Fluid with a count greater than 5000/mm3 is quite cloudy
⢠Ascitic fluid with a very low protein concentration may have no pigment and look
like water.
⢠An RBC count of 10,000/mm3 is the threshold for a pink appearance; lower
concentrations result in clear or turbid fluid. Ascitic fluid with an RBC count
greater than 20,000/mm3 is distinctly red. Blood stained fluid is usually due to
malignancy but may occur with tuberculosis, pancreatitis, hepatic vein
thrombosis, or due to a traumatic tap*
⢠Samples from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are regularly bloody, but
only about 10% of samples from patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis are
red**
⢠* Sood R. Ascites: diagnosis and management. Journal of Indian Academy of
Clinical Medicine 2000; 5: 80. 2000;9.
⢠** Runyon BA, Hoefs JC, Morgan TR. Ascitic fluid analysis in malignancyârelated
ascites. Hepatology. 1988 Sep 1;8(5):1104-9.
11. ⢠Opaque milky fluid- Chylous ascites (TG >200 mg/dl)
⢠Cloudy ascites, also known as pseudochylous ascites, may indicate
peritonitis, pancreatitis or a perforated bowel*
⢠Deeply jaundiced patients have bile-stained ascitic fluid
⢠Dark-brown fluid with a bilirubin concentration greater than that of serum
usually indicates biliary perforation**
⢠Pancreatic ascites may be pigmented because of the effect of pancreatic
enzymes on RBCs. The degree of pigmentation ranges from tea-colored to
jet black, as in pancreatic necrosis.
⢠Black ascitic fluid also may be found in patients with malignant melanoma
⢠*Oey RC, van Buuren HR, de Man RA. The diagnostic work-up in patients
with ascites: current guidelines and future prospects. Neth J Med. 2016 Oct
1;74:330-5
⢠** Runyon BA. Ascitic fluid bilirubin concentration as a key to the diagnosis
of choleperitoneum. J Clin Gastroenterol 1987; 9:543-5
12.
13. TESTS
ďąCELL COUNT:
⢠The WBC count in uncomplicated ascites in the setting of cirrhosis is usually
less than 500/mm3. The upper limit of normal for the absolute PMN count
in uncomplicated ascitic fluid in cirrhosis is usually stated to be lower than
250/mm3.
⢠SBP is the most common cause of an elevated ascetic Fluid WBC count
⢠An ascites-specific dipstick has been developed and calibrated to 100%
sensitivity in detecting a neutrophil count greater than or equal to 250
cells/mm*
⢠Leakage of blood into the peritoneal cavity leads to an elevated ascitic fluid
WBC count.To correct for this, 1 PMN is subtracted from the absolute
ascitic fluid PMN count for every 250 RBCs
*Mendler MH, Agarwal A, Trimzi M, et al. A new highly sensitive point of care
screen for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis using the leukocyte esterase
method. J Hepatol 2010; 53:477-83.
14. SERUM ASCITIS ALBUMIN GRADIENT
⢠Calculating the SAAG involves measuring the albumin concentration of
serum and ascitic fluid specimens obtained on the same day and
subtracting the ascitic fluid value from the serum value. If the SAAG is
greater than or equal to 1.1 g/dL (11g/L), the patient has portal
hypertension, with approximately 97% accuracy.*
⢠Conversely, if the SAAG is less than 1.1 g/dL (11 g/L), the patient is unlikely
to have portal hypertension
⢠If the first result is borderline (e.g., 1.0 or 1.1 g/dL )repeating the
paracentesis and analysis usually provides a definitive result
*Runyon BA, Montano AA, Akriviadis EA, Antillon MR, Irving MA,
McHutchison JG. The serum-ascites albumin gradient is superior to the
exudate-transudate concept in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Ann
Intern Med 1992;117:215-220
16. Distribution of ascites on the basis of SAAG
HIGH SAAG Percentage LOW SAAG Percentage
Cirrhosis 74.28 Peritoneal
Carcinomatosis
26.27
Decompensated
heart failure
17.14 Tuberculous
Ascites
26.27
HCC 5.71 Nephrotic
Syndrome
26.27
Tuberculous
Ascites
2.85 Pancreatits 13.33
Cirrhosis 6.66
*Sastry AS, Mahapatra SC, Dumpula
V. Ascitic fluid analysis with special
reference to serum ascites
cholesterol gradient and serum
ascites albumin gradient . Int J Res
Med Sci. 2017 Jan 23;5(2):429-36.
17. ďFALSE LOW SAAG:
⢠SR. Albumin <1 gm/dl
⢠Hypotension
⢠Sr. Globulins >5 gm/dl
To correct the SAAG in the setting of a high serum globulin level, the
following formula is used*:-
Corrected SAAG= Uncorrected SAAG X 0.16 X (Sr. Globulin + 2.5)
ďFALSE HIGH SAAG
⢠Chylous ascites
*Hoefs J. Globulin correction of the albumin gradient Correlation with
measured serum to ascites colloid osmotic gradient. Hepatology 1992;
16:396-403.
18. ASCITIC FLUID TOTAL PROTEIN
ďAscitic fluid total protein concentration <2.5 g/dl:-
⢠Uncomplicated Cirrhotic ascites*
⢠Nephrotic ascites
⢠HCC
⢠Massive Liver Metastasis
*(Almost 20% of ascitic fluid samples in patients with cirrhosis will have a protein
concentration greater than 2.5 g/dL)
ďAscitic fluid total protein concentration >2.5 g/dL:-
⢠Cardiac Ascites
(In patients with cardiac ascites, the SAAG may narrow with diuresis; such narrowing
does not happen in patients with cirrhosis.)
ďA total protein concentration <1.5 g/dl is generally considered a risk factor for SBP
19. Ascitic fluid Culture
⢠The most common bacterial infection of ascitic fluid, SBP, is monomicrobial, with
a low bacterial concentration (median colony count of only 1 organism/mL).*
⢠Multiple prospective trials have shown that bacterial growth occurs in only about
50% of instances when ascitic fluid with a polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN)
count greater than or equal to 250 cells/mm3 is cultured by older methods, i.e.
sending a syringe or tube of fluid to the laboratory, as compared to approximately
80% if the fluid is inoculated into blood culture bottles at the bedside and prior to
administration of antibiotics**
⢠A single dose of an effective antibiotic usually leads to a negative bacterial
culture.
*Runyon BA, Canawati HN, Akriviadis EA. Optimization of ascitic fluid culture
technique. Gastroenterology 1988; 95:1351-5
**Runyon BA, Antillon MR, Akriviadis EA, McHutchison JG. Bedside inoculation of
blood culture bottles is superior to delayed inoculation in the detection of
spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:2811-2812.
20. ďąASCITIC FLUID GLUCOSE:
⢠Ascitic fluid glucose can drop significantly in severe infections like secondary peritonitis
or late stage of SBP. Low glucose can also be found in malignant ascites.
⢠In early SBP, the ascitic fluid glucose concentration is similar to that of sterile fluid.
ďąASCITIC FLUID pH:
⢠Can be used for the diagnosis of SBP
⢠In a study*,the mean (¹S.E.) ascitic fluid pH in the SBP group was 7.25 ¹ 0.06 with a range
of 7.12 to 7.31, while the ascitic fluid pH in the group with sterile ascites was 7.47 Âą 0.07
with a range of 7.39 to 7.58. The pH of the blood in both groups was 7.47 Âą 0.03.
⢠The ascitic fluid pH is recommended as an easy, quick, sensitive, and specific means of
diagnosing SBP*
*Gitlin N, Stauffer JL, Silvestri RC. The pH of ascitic fluid in the diagnosis of spontaneous
bacterial peritonitis in alcoholic cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1982 Jul;2(4):408S-11S.
21. ďąAscitic Fluid LDH:
Elevated in:-
⢠Secondary peritonitis
⢠Malignant Ascites*
ďąAscitic Fluid Amylase:-
⢠In patients with acute pancreatitis or intestinal perforation (with release of
luminal amylase into the ascitic fluid), the fluid amylase concentration is
elevated markedly, usually greater than 2000 U/L, and approximately 5-fold
greater than simultaneous serum values
* Sevinc A, Sari R, Fadillioglu E. The utility of lactate dehydrogenase
isoenzyme pattern in the diagnostic evaluation of malignant and
nonmalignant ascites. J Nat Med Asso. 2005 Jan;97(1):79.
22. ďąAscitic fluid Bilirubin:-
An ascitic fluid bilirubin level greater than 6 mg/dL and greater than the
serum level of bilirubin suggests biliary or proximal small intestinal
perforation into ascitic fluid
ďąAscitic Fluid Triglyceride:
⢠Chylous ascites has a TG concentration greater than 200 mg/dL (2.26
mmol/L) and greater than the serum level.
⢠Abdominal malignancy and cirrhosis are the commonest causes in
developed countries and account for over two-thirds of all cases, whereas
chronic infections like tuberculosis and filariasis account for the majority of
the cases in developing countries*
*Al-Busafi SA, Ghali P, DeschĂŞnes M, Wong P. Chylous ascites: evaluation and
management. ISRN hepatology. 2014 Feb 3;2014.
23. Peritoneal Tuberculosis
ďąAscitic fluid for AFB and Mycobacterial culture:
⢠Examination of an Acid fast stained smear of ascitic fluid has a
disappointingly low yield. Direct smear for Ziehl-Neelson stain has a
reported sensitivity of 0 to 6 percent*
⢠The sensitivity of ascitic fluid mycobacterial culture (20â50%) is low**, and
because of the delay in obtaining the results of mycobacterial cultures of
ascitic fluid, the mortality is high***, and the value of these tests in the
differential diagnosis of ascites is limited.
*Chow KM, Chow VC, Szeto CC et al. Indication for peritoneal biopsy in tuberculous peritonitis. Am J Surg
2003; 185:567-73
**Suceveanu AI, Todescu D, Mazilu L, Manousos FG, Hulea R, Voinea F, Dumitru E, Suceveanu AP. Modern Tools
for Diagnosis in Tuberculous Ascites. InAscites-Physiopathology, Treatment, Complications and Prognosis 2017.
InTech.
**Hillebrand DJ, Runyon BA, Yasmineh WG, Rynders G. Ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase insensitivity in
detecting tuberculous peritonitis in the United States. Hepatology 1996;24:1408-1412.
***Chow KM, Chow VC, Hung LC, Wong SM, Szeto CC. Tuberculous peritonitisâassociated mortality is high
among patients waiting for the results of mycobacterial cultures of ascitic fluid samples. Clinical infectious
diseases. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):409-13.
24. ASCITIC FLUID ADA
1. Gupta VK, Mukherjee S, Dutta SK et a Diagnostic
evaluation of ascitic adenosine deaminase activity in
tubercular peritonitis. J Assoc Physicians India 1992;
40:387-9
2. Liao YJ, Wu CY, Lee SW et al Adenosine deaminase
activity in tuberculous peritonitis among patients with
underlying liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2012;
18:5260-5
3. Kang SJ, Kim JW, Baek JH, et al. Role
of ascites adenosine deaminase in differentiating
between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal
carcinomatosis. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:2837-43
4. KRISHNASWAMY DR, Narayan S, Priyadharshini K.
Evaluation of The Use of Ascitic Fluid Adenosine
Deaminase Activity in The Diagnosis of Tuberculous
Ascites. J Res Analysis. 2018 Feb 17;5(9).
5. Ali N, Nath NC, Parvin R, Rahman A, Bhuiyan TM, Rahman
M, Mohsin MN. Role of ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase
(ADA) and serum CA-125 in the diagnosis of tuberculous
peritonitis. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 2014
Dec;40(3):89-91.
STUDY CUT
OFF
LEVEL
SENSITIVITY SPECIFICITY
Gupta et al1 30 100 94.1
Liao et al2 27 100 93.3
Kang SJ groups3 21 92 85
Krishnaswamy et al4 30 86.8 97.5
Ali N et al5 24 93 96
25. ďąT-cell Based Testing for Mycobacterium Tuberculosis (ELISPOT)
⢠FDA approved Enzyme Linked Immunospot Assay (ELISPOT) measuring gamma
producing T-cell responses to early secreted antigenic targets of mycobacterium
tuberculosis
⢠Sharma et al* evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of ascitic
fluid interferon-gamma (IFN - gamma) and Adenosine deaminase (ADA) assays in
the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites. (IFN - gamma and ADA assays showed equal
sensitivity (0.97) and differed marginally in specificity (0.97 vs. 0.94). Difference in
AUCs was not significant (0.99 vs. 0.98, p<0.62)
⢠For differentiating TB from non-TB ascites, optimal cut off points were 112 pg/mL
for IFN-gamma and 37 IU/L for ADA.
ďąTissue Xpert⢠MTB/Rif assay
⢠Its of limited use in diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with exudative
ascites**
*Sharma SK, Tahir M, Mohan A et al Diagnostic accuracy of ascitic fluid IFN-gamma and adenosine deaminase
assays in the diagnosis of tuberculous ascites. J Interferon Cytokine Res 2006; 26:484-8.
**Bera C, Michael JS, Burad D, Shirly SB, Gibikote S, Ramakrishna B, Goel A, Eapen CE. Tissue Xpert⢠MTB/Rif
assay is of limited use in diagnosing peritoneal tuberculosis in patients with exudative ascites. Indian Journal of
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep 1;34(5):395-8.
26. Real time PCR bacterial DNA for
M.Tuberculosis
⢠PCR can be performed when tuberculous ascites is suspected.
⢠This method has a high sensitivity (94%)*
⢠PCR offers a timesaving method in contrast to current Mycobacterium
culture techniques.
*Tan MF, Ng WC, Chan SH, Tan WC. Comparative usefulness of PCR in the
detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in different clinical specimens. J
Med Microbiol. 1997;46:164-9.
*Portillo-Gomez L, Morris SL, Panduro A. Rapid and efficient detection of
extra-pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis by PCR analysis. Int J Tuberc
Lung Dis. 2000;4:361-70.
27. Ascitic Fluid cytology:
⢠The ascitic fluid cytology is positive only in the setting of peritoneal
carcinomatosis. The sensitivity of cytology in detecting peritoneal
carcinomatosis is 96.7% if 3 samples (from different paracentesis
procedures) are sent and processed promptly; the first sample is positive in
82.8% and at least 1 of 2 samples is positive in 93.3%.*
⢠Crucial factors are avoiding any time delay between obtaining the ascitic
fluid and cytology processing as well as obtaining at least 50 ml ascitic fluid,
or even 1000 ml if the first test was negative.**
⢠The sensitivity of cytology in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and
ascites is low (~27%)***
*Runyon BA, AASLD Practice Guidelines Committee. Management of adult patients with ascites due to
cirrhosis: update 2012. Hepatology. 2013 Feb;57(4):1651-3.
**Runyon BA, Hoefs JC, Morgan TR. Ascitic fluid analysis in malignancyrelated ascites. Hepatology.
1988;8:1104-9.
***Colli A, Cocciolo M, Riva C, et al. Ascitic fluid analysis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 1993;72:677-82
28. Ascitic Fluid Cholesterol and SACG
⢠Ascitic fluid cholesterol and Mean SACG are highly sensitive, specific and are
having high Diagnostic accuracy of 90% and 93% with a a cut off level of
70mg% and 54 mg% respectively. Hence being simple and cost effective,
these can be widely utilized to separate malignant ascitis from nonmalignant
causes*
*Sastry AS, Mahapatra SC, Dumpula V. Ascitic fluid analysis with special reference to serum ascites
cholesterol gradient and serum ascites albumin gradient. Int J Res Med Sci. 2017 Jan 23;5(2):429-36.
29. Others
ďąAscitic Fluid CA-125
⢠Essentially all patients including men with ascites or pleural fluid of any cause have an
elevated serum CA-125; when ascites is controlled, the CA-125 level decreases
dramatically. This test is elevated when mesothelial cells are under pressure from the
presence of fluid; it is very nonspecific.
⢠Patients with ascites should not have serum tested for CA-125.
ďąLeucocyte esterase reagent strips :
⢠Leukocyte esterase reagent strips are widely used for urinary analysis with the
advantages of a simple, inexpensive and rapid bedside test.
⢠Several studies have examined the usefulness of this method for diagnosing SBP and
found this test had a sensitivity and specificity ranging from 80-93% and 93-98%,
respectively. The negative predictive value is remarkably high ranging from 97-99%,
which makes it an ideal tool to rule out SBP*
*Rerknimitr R, Limmathurotsakul D, Bhokaisawan N, Kongkam P, Treeprasertsuk S, Kullavanijaya P. A
comparison of diagnostic efficacies among different reagent strips and automated cell count in
spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:946-50