SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
TRAINING AND TESTING
EXPERIMENTS
We use AVA dataset, a large-scale dataset for image quality
assessment
Total: 255,529 images
Training: 235,599 images
Testing: 19,930 images
EVALUATION
We employ different methods for evaluation:
 2 error metrics: RMSE & MAE
 Baseline comparison: compare to a trivial predictor
 - accuracy: a method to visualize a predictor’s performance
QUALITY SCORE DISTRIBUTION PREDICTIONVARIATION IN CROWD OPINIONS
Photo Quality Assessment: Predicting Crowd Opinions
Uyen Mai, Feng Liu
Computer Graphics and Vision Lab
Portland State University
RESULTS
Table 1: Regression Accuracy
Feature Effectiveness.
Figure 1: Feature Effectiveness(compared to baseline)
Acknowledgement: this project is in part supported by URMP
and Adobe Company.
For moe information, please contact
Uyen Mai
uyen.mai@pdx.edu
Feature
Extractor
Regression
Model
Feature
Vector
 = 5.1
 = 1.0
“Black box” Predictor
Input: an Image
Output: Score
Distribution
 = 4.9
 = 1.2
Predictor
Training
Images
Training Ground
Truth Labels
Feature
Extractor
Feature Vector
for Training
Regression
Model
Testing
Images
Feature Vector
for Testing
Predicted Labels
Testing Ground
Truth Labels
Prediction
Accuracy
Fit a
Random
Forest
Model
RMSE RMSE MAE MAE
Manually
Crafted
0.69 0.18 0.56 0.14
Deep
Learning
0.7 0.20 0.56 0.16
Generic 0.71 0.19 0.57 0.15
Combined 0.68 0.18 0.55 0.14
OBJECTIVE
Present a computational
method to predict a quality
score distribution produced by
users rating a photo
CONTRIBUTIONS
Propose an innovative
approach for image quality
assessment
Propose a regression
method that employs a wide
spectrum of the state-of-the-
art features
Contribute to the current
understanding of
computational photography
Feature Extractor
Extract a feature vector
from the input image
Include 3 categories of
features
 Manually crafted features
 Generic image features
 Deep learning features
Regression Model
Predict mean and std of
the score distribution given
a feature vector
Figure 2: ϵ-Accuracy curves. Each point in the curve
indicates the percentage of test images our regression
models accurately predict the score distribution mean
and std with respect to the tolerance threshold value ϵ

More Related Content

Similar to URMP2015

Multi-class Bio-images Classification
Multi-class Bio-images ClassificationMulti-class Bio-images Classification
Multi-class Bio-images Classification
Zhuo Li
 
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
CSCJournals
 

Similar to URMP2015 (20)

ppt.pptx
ppt.pptxppt.pptx
ppt.pptx
 
Multi-class Bio-images Classification
Multi-class Bio-images ClassificationMulti-class Bio-images Classification
Multi-class Bio-images Classification
 
EE-2018-1303261-1.pdf
EE-2018-1303261-1.pdfEE-2018-1303261-1.pdf
EE-2018-1303261-1.pdf
 
G04302058063
G04302058063G04302058063
G04302058063
 
13000121008_SAYAK JANA_Pattern Recognition.pptx
13000121008_SAYAK JANA_Pattern Recognition.pptx13000121008_SAYAK JANA_Pattern Recognition.pptx
13000121008_SAYAK JANA_Pattern Recognition.pptx
 
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation of Two New Histogram Limiting Binariz...
 
Image enhancement
Image enhancement Image enhancement
Image enhancement
 
7 ijaems sept-2015-8-design and implementation of fuzzy logic based image fus...
7 ijaems sept-2015-8-design and implementation of fuzzy logic based image fus...7 ijaems sept-2015-8-design and implementation of fuzzy logic based image fus...
7 ijaems sept-2015-8-design and implementation of fuzzy logic based image fus...
 
RapidMiner: Performance Validation And Visualization
RapidMiner: Performance Validation And VisualizationRapidMiner: Performance Validation And Visualization
RapidMiner: Performance Validation And Visualization
 
RapidMiner: Performance Validation And Visualization
RapidMiner:  Performance Validation And VisualizationRapidMiner:  Performance Validation And Visualization
RapidMiner: Performance Validation And Visualization
 
Fuzzy Logic based Contrast Enhancement
Fuzzy Logic based Contrast EnhancementFuzzy Logic based Contrast Enhancement
Fuzzy Logic based Contrast Enhancement
 
Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification
Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classificationSelf-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification
Self-training with Noisy Student improves ImageNet classification
 
Comparison of Various Web Image Re - Ranking Techniques
Comparison of Various Web Image Re - Ranking TechniquesComparison of Various Web Image Re - Ranking Techniques
Comparison of Various Web Image Re - Ranking Techniques
 
custom_vison_model.pdf
custom_vison_model.pdfcustom_vison_model.pdf
custom_vison_model.pdf
 
poster
posterposter
poster
 
An Effective Attendance Management System using Face Recognition
An Effective Attendance Management System using Face RecognitionAn Effective Attendance Management System using Face Recognition
An Effective Attendance Management System using Face Recognition
 
IRJET-Comparision of PCA and LDA Techniques for Face Recognition Feature Base...
IRJET-Comparision of PCA and LDA Techniques for Face Recognition Feature Base...IRJET-Comparision of PCA and LDA Techniques for Face Recognition Feature Base...
IRJET-Comparision of PCA and LDA Techniques for Face Recognition Feature Base...
 
Learning to Resize Images for Computer Vision Tasks
Learning to Resize Images for Computer Vision TasksLearning to Resize Images for Computer Vision Tasks
Learning to Resize Images for Computer Vision Tasks
 
Ijip 742Image Fusion Quality Assessment of High Resolution Satellite Imagery ...
Ijip 742Image Fusion Quality Assessment of High Resolution Satellite Imagery ...Ijip 742Image Fusion Quality Assessment of High Resolution Satellite Imagery ...
Ijip 742Image Fusion Quality Assessment of High Resolution Satellite Imagery ...
 
A feature-Enriched Completely Blind image Quality Evaluator
A feature-Enriched Completely Blind image Quality EvaluatorA feature-Enriched Completely Blind image Quality Evaluator
A feature-Enriched Completely Blind image Quality Evaluator
 

URMP2015

  • 1. TRAINING AND TESTING EXPERIMENTS We use AVA dataset, a large-scale dataset for image quality assessment Total: 255,529 images Training: 235,599 images Testing: 19,930 images EVALUATION We employ different methods for evaluation:  2 error metrics: RMSE & MAE  Baseline comparison: compare to a trivial predictor  - accuracy: a method to visualize a predictor’s performance QUALITY SCORE DISTRIBUTION PREDICTIONVARIATION IN CROWD OPINIONS Photo Quality Assessment: Predicting Crowd Opinions Uyen Mai, Feng Liu Computer Graphics and Vision Lab Portland State University RESULTS Table 1: Regression Accuracy Feature Effectiveness. Figure 1: Feature Effectiveness(compared to baseline) Acknowledgement: this project is in part supported by URMP and Adobe Company. For moe information, please contact Uyen Mai uyen.mai@pdx.edu Feature Extractor Regression Model Feature Vector  = 5.1  = 1.0 “Black box” Predictor Input: an Image Output: Score Distribution  = 4.9  = 1.2 Predictor Training Images Training Ground Truth Labels Feature Extractor Feature Vector for Training Regression Model Testing Images Feature Vector for Testing Predicted Labels Testing Ground Truth Labels Prediction Accuracy Fit a Random Forest Model RMSE RMSE MAE MAE Manually Crafted 0.69 0.18 0.56 0.14 Deep Learning 0.7 0.20 0.56 0.16 Generic 0.71 0.19 0.57 0.15 Combined 0.68 0.18 0.55 0.14 OBJECTIVE Present a computational method to predict a quality score distribution produced by users rating a photo CONTRIBUTIONS Propose an innovative approach for image quality assessment Propose a regression method that employs a wide spectrum of the state-of-the- art features Contribute to the current understanding of computational photography Feature Extractor Extract a feature vector from the input image Include 3 categories of features  Manually crafted features  Generic image features  Deep learning features Regression Model Predict mean and std of the score distribution given a feature vector Figure 2: ϵ-Accuracy curves. Each point in the curve indicates the percentage of test images our regression models accurately predict the score distribution mean and std with respect to the tolerance threshold value ϵ