1. Analysis of Quality Scorecard –
Up To May-2015

2. Department
Maximum
score
Goal
Achieved
score
Jan Feb March Apr May Result Responsible
01. Quality Assurance dept.
a
Chemical test rejection%
(H&M)// 2014's stop order
was related for chemical
fault, it will count this year.
0 100% 0 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Not
achieved
Mrs. Akhi
b
Physical test rejection%
(H&M in-house, pick up
bulk goods by hm
responsible) // complain
about pilling (may-15)
5 95% 5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Achieved
c
Lab performance
%(Audit H&M, physical
color test)
2.5 100% 2.5 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Achieved "
d
Chemical & color
performance (Audit H&M,
On ECR+color lab)
2.5 100% 0.5 67% 67% not achieved Mr. Mamun
10 8

3. Continue……………..
Department
Maxim
um
score
Goal
Achieve
d score
Jan Feb
Marc
h
Apr May Avg. Result Responsible
02. Sample Quality
a Development sample rejection % 3 100% 3 100% 100% 100%100% 100% achieved Mr. Mobin
b Quatation sample rejection % 4.5 95% 4.5 90% 100% 98% 100% 98.13% Achieved "
c Size set sample rejection % 4.5 100% 0 89% 100% 100% 97% 97.30%
Not
achieved
"
d Counter sample rejection % 3 100% 0 100% 100% 94% 96.15%
Not
achieved
,,
15 7.5
03. RQS
a RQS score 45 100 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 achieved Mr. Abraham
45 38

4. Continue……………..
Department
Maxim
um
score
Goal
Achieved
score
Jan Feb
Marc
h
Apr May Avg. Result Responsible
04. Quality Control
a
Initial / Inline
rejection%
5 95% 0 93% 85% 86% 99% 98% 92.44%
not
achieved
Mr.
Utpal,
Swapon,
Nazrul
b
Final inspection
rejection %
5 98% 5 95% 100% 100% 96% 100% 98.39% Achieved
c
NQC score check inline/
final
N/A
d NQC score N/A
10 5
05. Stop order
a
Stop order
(2014's stop order will
adding this year)
10
No
stop
order
0
No
stop
order
No
stop
order
No
stop
order
No
stop
order
No
stop
order
Not
Achieved
All department
In-total = 90 58.5

5. Inspection data analysis

6. H&M QC's report Up to May’2015
(Initial & inline fail %)
Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
Metro-01 H&M 15.38% 57.14% 15.91% 0.00% 4% 14.93%
Metro-02 H&M 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Beacon-
02
H&M 6.25% 7.50% 13.79% 3.57% 2.94% 6.80%

7. H&M QC's report Up to
May’2015 (Final fail %)
Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
Metro-01 H&M 100.00% nill 0.00% 0.00% 0% 6.67%
Metro-02 H&M 0% 0% 0.00% 0% 0% 0%
Beacon-02 H&M 4.17% 0.00% 0.00% 4.55% 0% 1.56%

8. Buyer wise Inspection data
analysis (Trial+Inline fail %)
Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
Metro-01
H&M 13.59% 8.86% 9.09% 7.25% 5.70% 8.14%
Promodoro 13.33% 6.67% no rep no rep 10.53% 9.38%
Ostin 0% 0% no rep 0% 0% 0.00%
INA 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Metro-02
H&M 24.27% 14.15% 14.55% 2.42% 5.11% 13.32%
GU 0% 1.28% 0% 0% 0.54%
LERROS 40.63% 37.14% 69.23% 14.29% 41.23%
Calzedonia 12.50% No rep 0% 0% 4.76%
Echo 100% 33.33% 45.45%
Beacon-02
H&M 6.25% 7.50% 13.79% 3.57% 2.94% 6.80%
Varner No rep 50% 40% 8.70% 27.78% 26.77%

9. Buyer wise Inspection data
analysis (Pre-final + Final) fail %
Unit Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
Metro-01
H&M 2.21% 0.88% 2.08% 3.21% 3.29% 2.25%
Promodoro 9.09% 4.76% 1.82 4.84% 10.34% 4.96%
Ostin 0% 0% No rep 0% 0% 0.00%
INA 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Metro-02
H&M 0% 0% 3.45% 0% 0.51% 0.36%
GU 1.82% 1.50% 0% 0% 1.23%
LERROS 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Calzedonia 0% nill 18.18% 0% 10.53%
Echo 0% 0.00%
Beacon-02
H&M 6.25% 5.77% 2.23% 7.82% 3.97% 5.65%
Varner 1.96% 0.00% 2% 9.09% 5.94% 4.27%

10. Sewing & Finishing alter &
spot % data analysis up to
May’2015

11. Sewing alter & spot %
(Goal below 5%)
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
13%
12% 12%
15%
14%
13.2%
Metro-01
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
7%
8%
6%
5% 5%
6.2%
Metro-02
6%
6%
7%
7%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
7%
6% 6% 6% 6%
6.2%
Beacon-02

12. Finishing alter & spot %
(Goal below 3%)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
14% 14% 14%
20%
18%
16.0%
Metro-01
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
15%
20%
15%
13%
10%
14.6%
Metro-02
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
15%
11%
13%
14%
9%
12.4%
Beacon-02

13. Sewing & Finishing Rejection%
data analysis up to May’2015

14. Sewing Rejection % -- Goal
below 1%
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.40%
0.50%
0.60%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
0.38%
0.43% 0.42%
0.55%
0.34%
0.42%
Metro-01
0.00%
0.05%
0.10%
0.15%
0.20%
0.25%
0.30%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
0.28%
0.26%
0.19% 0.19%
0.23% 0.23%
Metro-02
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.40%
0.50%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
0.40%
0.28%
0.32%
0.45%
0.20%
0.33%
Beacon-02

15. Finishing Rejection % -- Goal
below 1%
0.00%
0.10%
0.20%
0.30%
0.40%
0.50%
0.60%
0.70%
0.80%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
0.61%
0.48% 0.46%
0.76%
0.60% 0.58%
Metro-01
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
1.40%
1.60%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
1.24%
1.54%
1.26%
0.86%
0.51%
1.08%
Metro-02
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
0.87% 0.89%
0.43% 0.47% 0.47%
0.63%
Beacon-02

16. Print Panel Short & Rejection %
-- Goal below 2%
2.13%
1.35%
2.44%
1.89%
1.88%
2.49%
2.62%
3.39%
1.48%
3.22%
1.74%
1.55%
2.34%
0.96%
0.66%
2.09%
1.88%
2.76%
1.44%
2.07%
0.00%
0.50%
1.00%
1.50%
2.00%
2.50%
3.00%
3.50%
4.00%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May
Metro-01
Metro-02
Beacon-02
Average

17. INHOUSE CHEST PRINT TEST
FAIL % (Mercer Lab)
Buyer Test stage Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
H&M
Sample 8% 0% 6% 0% 4% 3.45%
Trial 23% 12% 17% 0% 40% 18.60%
Bulk 7% 6% 3% 4% 12% 7.57%
GU
Sample 27% 30% 5% 0% 5% 11.88%
OTM/Trial 19% 19% 19% 20% 6% 16.58%
Bulk 13% 17% 9% 7% 5% 11.38%
Varner
Sample 20% 0% 14% 0% 0% 6.56%
Trial 25% 50% 0% 33% 0% 38.71%
Bulk 0% 21% 0% 11% 9% 14.10%
Lerros
Sample 11% 0% 11% 0% 5.56%
Trial 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Bulk 0% 5% 0% 0% 2.86%
Ostin
Sample 55% 33% 11% 25% 27.03%
Trial 37% 20% 33% 9% 23.33%
Bulk 39% 9% 16% 0% 16.48%
Cazledonia
Sample 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Trial 33% 0% 0% 16.67%
Bulk 0% 0% 29% 20.00%
INA
Sample 0% 0% 0.00%
Trial 0% 0% 0.00%
Bulk 0% 0% 0.00%

18. Cut Panel Rejection Summary
up to May-2015

19. Slub
Hole
Y/C
Lycraout
Misyarn
N/Mark
Allspot
Number
spot
Testreject
Loop
Diashort
Missprint
Oilspot
Softner
spot
Crease
mark
Others
4384
42935
2652 2646
7335 9174
15852
466 621 1383
37052
15070
83 162 160
3516
Category wise rejection qty (pcs) ( Included 3 units )
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
2.63%
2.02%
1.77%
1.85%
2.20% 2.09%
Month wise rejection %(3units included)

20. Buyer wise 3rd party physical test
fail %
H&M
GU,eachcolor
GU,bulk
ostin
varner
Promodoro
Calzedonia
INA
4.88%
8.78%
14.75%
0.00%
20.79%
11.54%
50.00%
20.00%

21. Data Analysis of Sample Section

22. Sample 3rd PARTY TEST FAIL %
Buyer Sample stage Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
H&M
Development samp. 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.00%
Quatation sample 10% 0% 2% 0% 1.87%
Size set sample 11% 0% 0% 3.45% 2.70%
Counter sample 0% 0% 0% 6.25% 3.85%
GU
Development samp. 0% 0% 0.00%
APP sample 0% 0% 0.00%
Each color sample 0% 0.00%
Varner
Development samp. no rep no rep
Photo sample 0% 0.00%
Size set sample 0% 0.00%
PP sample 0% 0% 0.00%
Ostin
1st sample no rep no rep
PBI sample 0% no rep 0.00%
PPS sample no rep no rep
INA
Photo sample 0% no rep 0.00%
Sales man sample no rep no rep
Size set no rep no rep
Calzedonia
PP Sample 0% 0.00%
Photo sample 16.67% 16.67%
Size set sample 0% 0.00%

23. INHOUSE SAMPLE FAIL %
Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
H&M 1.76% 0.87% 1.82% 1.45%
GU 0% 0% 1.60% 0.75%
Varner 0% 0% 1.23% 0.86%
Ostin 0% 0% 5.56% 1.92%
INA 0% 28.57% 0% 11.76%
Calzedonia 0% 0% 3.57% 2.63%
Promodoro 0% 0% 0.00%
AVERAGE = 0.93% 0.58% 2.12% 1.38%

24. ONTIME SAMPLE
SUBMISSION DELAY %
Buyer Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
H&M 88% 88.00% 93.00% 93.49% 91.04%
GU 80% 84% 46% 93.04% 79.72%
Varner 33% 91% 100% 98.71% 97.35%
Ostin 75% 100% 100% 83.33% 91.84%
INA 100% 100% 100% 100.00%
Calzedonia 50% 100% 85.18% 80.56%
Promodoro 100% 100% 100.00%
Average = 85.62% 87.79% 84.84% 94.27% 89.92%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
85.62%
87.79%
84.84%
94.27%
89.92%
Month wise average delay
%

25. Supplementary Analysis (Include 3
Units), Up to May-2015

26. Category wise Supplementary
Metro-1 Metro-2 Beacon-2 In-total
Cut Panel 2612 485 1189 4286
Screen Print 524 454 275 1253
Dyeing bal./problem 150 150
Washing 127 127
Dia + / - 509 509
GSM + / - 110 678 332 1120
Complete gmts rejection 123 241 364
Supplementary balance
Pcs cut wash
Complete gmts shading
Consumption problem 1297 1297
Fabric return 0
uneven/running shade 66 374 440
AOP problem 1800 1800
cutting
Pattern increase
Technical
Rib 268 149 417
Others 185 185
IN-TOTAL 7336 2201 2411 11948
Fabric delivery (kg) 407256 297953 251,805 957014
Supplementary % 1.80% 0.74% 0.96% 1.25%

27. Month wise supplementary %
(Included 3 units)
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Avg.
1.58%
0.95%
0.65%
0.79%
1.25%
1.04%
Month wise supplementary % (3 units included)

28. Indent Nonconforming Report –
Metro Unit-2
Date Buyer Order No Style Access. Name
Correct
information
Mistake on indent
Merchandis
er
Cause of
Nonconfirm
17.05.15 H&M 234550
Mario Pattern
Trow.
CARE LABEL
SATEN REBON
BLACK
SATEN REBON
OFF WHITE
Riblu
" " " " ME LABEL " " "
21.05.15 GU
603245F0
28A
W S Graphic T
shirt
Interlining
Sample has
Interlining.
Not required Rony saha
24.05.15 H&M 250010 Lisa Pj Kaff Label GB &DE
DE Country Not
Required
Riblu
" " 251013 " " " " "
27.05.15 GU
60275F05
6A
W S SWEATER
LONG
WOOLY TAPE Sample use Not required Rony saha
25.05.15 " GM 000A C NECK CARE Label
ITEM CODE (52-
05)
ITEM CODE (52-
01)
SHAKIL Order Wrong
" " GM001 V NECK "
ITEM CODE (52-
04)
ITEM CODE (52-
01)
SHAKIL Order Wrong
30.05.15 "
60245F04
9A
"
ITEM CODE(53-
03)
ITEM CODE(53-
01)
ASAD Order Wrong

29. Thanks……….