2. 2
Effect of Betahistine on
cochlear blood flow
Effect of I. V. Betahistine on diameter of
anterior inferior cerebellar artery and
cochlear blood flow studied in guinea pigs
using Laser Doppler Flowmetry
Laurikainen, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1998, 255, 119-123
3. 3
Mean increase of 40% in cochlear blood flow
with infusion of Betahistine
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Time (min after infusion)
%changefrombaselinein
CBF
Laurikainen E, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1998, 255, 119-123
4. 4
Effect of Betahistine on
Cochlear blood flow
Mean increase of 40% in cochlear blood flow
(CBF) with Betahistine
Diameter of Anterior Inferior Cerebellar
Artery (AICA) increased by 17-20% indicating
that Betahistine evoked increases in CBF
resulted primarily from vasodilation of AICA
Laurikainen E, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1998, 255, 119-123
5. 5
Effect of Betahistine on
Cerebral Blood Flow
50 adult patients with Vertebrobasilar arterial
insufficiency with dementia.
2 treatment periods of 6 weeks each.
Group I Betahistine 8 mg q.i.d.followed by placebo
Group II Reverse order
Assessment : Neurologic, Neuropsychologic, cerebral
blood flow
-- Rivera V M et al, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc, (1974), 22/9, 397-406
6. 6
Mean increase of 14. 8 % in cerebral blood flow
with Betahistine
Betahistine
-2.60%
+ 14.80%
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
Placebo
%changeinmean
regionalcerebralbloodflow
Adapted from Rivera VM et al, J.Am. Geriatr.Soc., (1974), 22/9, 397-406
7. 7
020406080100
0 5 10 15 20
Time(Min) after Betahistine administration
%spikenumber
0.1mg/kgBH 1mg/kgBH 5mg/kgBH
Dose-dependent reduction in spike no. of polysynaptic neurons
in Lateral Vestibular Nucleus (LVN) with Betahistine
Unemoto et al, Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1982, 236, 229-236
8. 8
Conclusion
Spike generation of polysynaptic neurons
in Lateral Vestibular Nucleus (LVN) is
inhibited by intravenous as well as
iontophoretic administration of Betahistine
in a dose-dependent manner.
Unemoto et al, Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 1982, 236, 229-236
10. 10
1.8
2.2
2.6
3
3.4
3.8
0 5 10
crossover weeks
MeanFrequencyScore
Significant reduction in frequency of vertigo attacks with
Betahistine compared to placebo-Prophylactic effect
--Oosterveld W J et al, J Drug Ther. & Res. (1989), 14 (4),122-6
Betahistine
Placebo
11. 11
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 5 10
crossover weeks
Meanseverityscore
Significant reduction in severity of vertigo attacks with
Betahistine compared to placebo-symptomatic relief
--Oosterveld W J et al, J.Drug Ther. Res., (1989), 14(4), 122-6
Betahistine
Placebo
12. 12
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 30 60 90 days
intensityofattacks
Significant reduction in intensity of Vertigo
attacks with Betahistine
Betahistine
Placebo
-- Legent F et al, Concours Med, (1988), 29
(Examination Time)
13. 13
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 30 60 90 days
No.ofpatientsfreeofVertiginous
attacks
-- Legent F et al, Concours Med, (1988), 29
No vertigo attacks in 75% of patients after
3 months of the treatment with Betahistine
Betahistine
Placebo
(Examination Time)
14. 14
Improvement of 28 patients with Meniere's
disease treated by Betahistine
16
11
1
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Complete relief Partial relief No response
Hicks, Arch Otolaryngol, 1967, 86, 610-3
Numberofpatients
16. 16
Dose-Dependent effect of Betahistine in
Improving cochlear blood flow (Laurikainen, 1993)
Reducing firing frequency of vestibular nuclei
(Unemoto, 1982 )
Reducing duration of nystagmus (Oosterveld, 1987)
Reduction in resting firing of ampullar receptors
(Botta, 2000)
Higher the dose, faster and better the effect
17. 17
Betahistine - Dose-Dependent Effect on
Induced Vestibular Nystagmus
3 different single oral dosages of Betahistine
(8, 16, 32 mg) to 10 normal subjects with inter test
interval of 1 week
Assessment :
Duration of induced nystagmus
Post-treatment duration calculated as % of pre-
treatment duration.
--Oosterveld W J, Clin Otolaryngol, (1987), 12, 131-5
18. 18
20
40
60
80
100
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Hours after drug intake -->
Nystagmusduration%
8 mg
16mg
32 mg
--Oosterveld W J, Clin Otolaryngol, (1987), 12, 131-5
Betahistine: Dose-dependent reduction in
duration of induced nystagmus
20. 20
115.6
72.2 70.4
113
73.2 72
0
100
B.P. systolic B.P. diastolic pulse
pre-treatment
post-treatment
No changes in B. P. & pulse after treatment with
Betahistine in Normal Subjects
Adapted from : --Stough AR, Curr. Ther. Res., 1963, 5, 10, 542-9
21. 21
Tolerance of Betahistine
No drowsiness
No gastric side effects
No cardiac side-effects
Bradoo et al, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52(2), 151-8,
Betahistine IN Collin Dollery Therapeutc drugs B 62-5
23. 23
Results: Comparing efficacy of Betahistine and
Cinnarizine in facilitating vestibular compensation
Lesser Vestibulo Ocular Reflux (VOR)
asymmetry score with Betahistine treatment than
with Cinnarizine treatment
Higher degree of vestibular compensation with
Betahistine than with Cinnarizine
Faster recovery with Betahistine than Cinnarizine
Colletti, Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, suppl 544, 27-33
24. 24
Effects of Betahistine metabolite on firing
activity of frog ampullar receptors assessed
Nerve firing rate recorded from ampullar nerve
both in resting & mechanically evoked state
3 Betahistine metabolites administered (10-7
M to
10-2
M )
M1 (aminoethylpyridine), M2 (Hydroxyethyl
pyridine), M3 (pyridylacetic acid)
--Botta L, Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, 120, 25-7
25. 25
Results
Only one metabolite M1 (Aminoethyl pyridine) had
significant effects on ampullar firing rate.
Two other metabolite M2 and M3 were completely
inactive
M1 (Aminoethyl pyridine) reduced resting ampullar
firing rate, mechanically evoked responses
unaffected.
--Botta L, Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, 120, 25-7
27. 27
Conclusion
Betahistine metabolite (Aminoethyl pyridine)
reduces the resting discharge / ampullar firing,
without affecting the evoked responses
Hypothesis put forward --
Antivertigo action of Betahistine is first
achieved by Betahistine itself and then sustained
by the metabolite-aminoethyl pyridine
- Botta L, Acta Otolaryngol, 2000, 120, 25-27
28. 28
Management of acute vertigo
with Betahistine
Dr. R.A. Bradoo
Head, Dept. of ENT ,
Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and Hospital,
Sion, Mumbai
Ind. J. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surgery
April - June 2000, 52(2), 151-8
29. 29
An Open study
Methodology
29 patients with at least one episode of vertigo in
the preceding month
Treatment period maximum of 6 weeks or earlier
until remission of attacks
Betahistine at a dose of 16 mg.t.i.d.
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
30. 30
Weekly Assessment upto 6 weeks
Frequency - number of attacks per week
Duration of vertigo attacks in minutes
Severity of attacks as
No attacks 0
Absent No attacks interfering with routine 1
Mild some interference with routine 2
Severe disruption of daily routine 3
Incapacitating Confined to bed 4
# Effect on associated symptoms such as tinnitus, hearing loss,
nausea, vomiting, faintness, headache
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
31. 31
At the end of the treatment
Global Evaluation
Patients’ & Investigators’opinion on efficacy &
tolerance of the treatment
Tolerance of the treatment
Side effects observed if any
Any gastrointestinal disturbances
Questions on experience of drowsiness and effect
of drug on the quality of life
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
32. 32
Mean symptom score before & after treatment with
Betahistine 16 mg t.i.d. (n=29)
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
Parameter Weeks of Betahistine treatment
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency 14.66 5.62* 3.9** 0.69** 0.41** 0**
100% 38.3% 26.6% 4.7% 2.85 0%
Duration 33.81 15.8* 6.4** 2.07** 1.04** 0**
(min) 100% 46.8% 18.9% 6.12% 3.1% 0%
Severity score 2.9 1.83* 0.69** 0.14** 0.14** 0**
100% 63.1% 23.8% 4.85 4.85 0%
* significant, ** highly significant
33. 33
Mean symptom score (%) before & after treatment
with Betahistine 16 mg t.i.d. (n=29)
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
100 100 100
18.9 23.8
4.7 6.1 4.8
26.6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Frequency Duration Severity
wk 0
wk 2
wk 3
Symptomscore%
34. 34
Mean symptom score of patients with
acute vertigo attacks at baseline (n=18)
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
Parameter Weeks of Betahistine treatment
0 1 2 3
Frequency 14.39 4.94* 3.89** 0**
100% 30.5% 27%
Duration 23.19 6.27** 0.15** 0**
(min) 100% 27% 0.7%
Severity score 3.0 1.94* 0.67** 0**
100% 64.7% 22.3%
* significant, ** highly significant
35. 35
Mean symptom score (%) of patients with
acute vertigo attacks at baseline ( n=18)
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
100 100 100
27
0.70 0 0
64.7
34.3
27 22.3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Frequency Duration Severity
wk 0
wk 1
wk 2
wk 3
Symptomscore%
36. 36
Global evaluation (n=29)
Parameters Excellent-good rating in
% of patients by
Patients Physicians
Efficacy 100%100%
Tolerance 100%100%
Effect on associated 95%95%
symptoms
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
37. 37
Effect of Betahistine on associated
symptoms in vertigo patients
Associated No. of Vertigo patients
Symptom
Weeks of treatment
wk 0 wk 1 wk 2 wk 3
Tinnitus 15 7 1 0
Nausea/Vomiting 6 0
Total no. of patients with vertigo = 29
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
39. 39
Tolerance of the treatment
No drop-outs due to side effects
No gastrointestinal disturbances
None of the patients experienced drowsiness
Drug treatment did not affect quality of life in
any patient
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
40. 40
Conclusion
Excellent efficacy of Betahistine at dose of
16 mg t.i.d.
Excellent tolerance of Betahistine at this dose
without side effects - drowsiness, G.I.
disturbances
Very effective in management of acute vertigo
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
41. 41
Highlights of the trial
First Indian Trial of Vertin at a specific dose of 16 mg
t.i.d. in medical College
Vertin at a dose of 16 mg t.i.d offers faster and better
results. 93 % patients completely relieved within 3
weeks of the therapy
Also proves the excellent tolerance of Betahistine at a
dosage of 16 mg t.i.d.
Focus on new insight into the management of acute
cases with this therapy
Bradoo RA, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 2000, 52 (2), 151-8
42. 42
Pre and post Betahistine therapy
99m Tc HMPAO BRAIN SPECT studies in
patients with vertigo
Dr. B.A.Krishna, Head - Nuclear Medicine,
Dr. M. V. Kirtane, H.O.D. ENT Dept.
P.D. Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai
Neurology India, Sept. 2000, 48 , 255-9
To observe the effects of Betahistine on different
hypoperfused areas of brain in vertigo patients
43. 43
SPECT Principle
(Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography)
HMPAO labeled with 99m TC-
Lipophilic compound taken by brain tissue
Can quantitate the blood perfusion in different areas of brain based
on color scale
Uptake depends on blood perfusion of brain
Decay of this compound leads to emission of high energy
photons-counted by gamma camera
Images reconstructed to obtain transaxial, sagittal, coronal views
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
44. 44
Vertin - SPECT study
Part I - Vertigo patients consulting neurotologists with a
probable diagnosis of ischemia of areas of brain -included
in the trial
Part II - Patients subjected to baseline SPECT images in
Nuclear Medicine Department to identify hypoperfusion
in different areas of brain
Part III - Patients with hypoperfusion given Betahistine 16
mg t.i.d. and clinical examination done every week by
Neurotologist for symptoms
Part IV - SPECT repeated to observe effects of drug on
hypoperfusion, quantify the same and correlate with the
clinical improvement
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
45. 45
SPECT Results
No. patients entered the study 11
No. of patients with normal perfusion at baseline 2
No. of patients with hypoperfusion at baseline 9
Patients lost to follow- up 2
No. of patients who completed the study 7
Complete Improvement 6
Partial improvement 1
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
46. 46
99m
Tc HMPAO transaxial images of brain (6mm slices)
P.D. Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai
Figure I: The top row images show HYPOPERFUSION in the left temporal lobe prior to therapy &
the bottom row images of the same patient show complete NORMALISATION OF PERFUSION
after 4 weeks of Betahistine therapy 16 mg three times daily
Pre-Betahistine Therapy (15.06.1999) No. 2540
Post-Betahistine Therapy (12.07.1999) No. 2922
Reference Image
SPECT MRI
R L R L
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
47. 47
99m
Tc- HMPAO transaxial images of brain (6 mm slices)
P.D.Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai
Figure II: The top row images show HYPOPERFUSION in the right inferior cerebellar
region prior to therapy. The bottom row images show almost complete
NORMALISATION OF PERFUSION following 2 weeks of Betahistine therapy 16 mg
three times daily.
Pre-Betahistine Therapy (27.02.1998) No.791
Post-Betahistine Therapy (10.03.1998) No. 1950
Reference Image
SPECT MRI
R L R L
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
48. 48
99m
Tc- HMPAO sagittal images of brain (6 mm slices)
P.D. Hinduja National Hospital, Mumbai
Figure III: The top row images show a well-defined focalized HYPOPERFUSION in
the right parieto-occipital region prior to therapy. The bottom row images show
almost complete NORMALISATION OF PERFUSION of this region after 3 weeks of
Betahistine therapy 16 mg three times daily.
Pre-Betahistine Therapy (17.03.1999) No.1086
Post-Betahistine Therapy (08.04.1999) No.1599
Reference Image
SPECT MRI
R L R L
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
49. 49
Regional distribution of perfusion abnormalities
and improvement
Areas No. of hypoperfused No. of areas
areas at baseline improved with
Betahistine
Temporal 9 7
Cerebellar 4 4
Parieto-occipital 5 3
Total 18 14
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
50. 50
Conclusion
99m Tc - HMPAO Brain SPECT - an important
diagnostic tool
Betahistine at a dose of 16 mg t.i.d. is an effective
antivertigo therapy which improves blood perfusion
to hypoperfused areas of brain in vertigo patients
Ischemia of cerebellar region which is the main
cause of vertigo showed complete normalization of
perfusion with Betahistine therapy.
Krishna BA, Kirtane MV, Neurology India, 2000,48, 255-9
54. 54
A comparison of Betahistine and Cinnarizine
Betahistine Cinnarizine
No drowsiness Drowsiness - side effect
Facilitates compensation slows down compensation
Suitable for use with should not be used with
vestibular habituation vestibular habituation
therapy therapy
Kirtane MV, Ind. J. Otolaryngol H N S, 1999, 51 (2), 27-36 ,
Colletti V, Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 544, 27-33.
55. 55
Double- blind crossover trial of Betahistine vs.
Prochlorperazine Vs. Placebo
12 healthy volunteers
High dosage of Betahistine used (72 mg tds for 3 days)
Subjects performed driving tests
weaving in & out of traffic cones
driving through a narrow gap between traffic cones
Assessed carelessness (Hitting cones!), errors of
judgement and slowing of response
Betts,Brit. J. Clin. Pharmacol, 1991, 32, 455-8
56. 56
Driving test: mean number of cones hit
9.0
5.5
4.0
Prochlorperazine
Betahistine
Placebo
Bettts, Brit. J. Clin. Pharmacol, 1991, 32, 455-8
57. 57
Betahistine : Summary
Improves cerebral & cochlear blood flow
Reduces resting firing of ampullar receptors without
affecting evoked responses
Provides faster relief & better efficacy in relieving
vertigo
Free from drowsiness
Facilitates vestibular compensation
Offers a dose-dependent effect
Relieves associated symptoms like nausea, vomiting,
tinnitus
58. 58
Betahistine
Features
Improves cochlear and
cerebral blood flow
Regulates firing activity of
vestibular nuclei
Dose dependent effect
Does not slow down
compensation
Benefits
Prophylactic effect by reducing
frequency of vertigo attacks
Symptomatic relief by reducing
severity of attacks
Higher the dose, better the action.
Higher dose useful for acute
attacks
Suitable for use with Vestibular
Habituation therapy
Editor's Notes
<number>
Study Design : double-blind , cross-over No. of patients : 50 adult patients with Vertebrobasilar arterial insufficiency (VBI) with dementia Two treatment periods of 6 wks.each. . Grp I (n=29) Betahistine (32mg/d) for 1st period followed by identical placebo in IInd period, Grp II (n=21) Reverse order. Assessment :Evaluations made initially & at intervals of 6 weeks each , included detailed assessment of neurologic functions according to quantitative scale. Neuropsychologic tests included Wechsler Adult Intelligence scale(WAIS), Wechsler Memory Scale, Halstead - Wepman Aphasia Screening Test (Reitan Modification), Reitan Trailmaking Test, Finger Tapping Test , Tactual Performance Test for elderly & Reitan Sensory- Perceptual Examination. Regional cerebral blood flow measurements were carried out in 15 patients using intracarotid injections of xenon133 & gamma camera.
<number>
Out of 15 patients , only in 5 patients the assessment was complete at all intervals. Administration of placebo resulted in a mean decrease of 2.6 % in mean regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) (p < 0.05) whereas administration of Betahistine resulted in mean increase of 14.8 % in mean rCBF (p < 0.025). The difference between placebo & Betahistine was significant at (p < 0.005).
<number>
This electrophysiological study, by Japanese researchers studied effects of Betahistine on neuron activity of Lateral Vestibular Nucleus (LVN).
No.of sub : 30 adult cats Method : A bipolar electrode for stimulation of vestibular nerve was inserted through round window of middle ear in cats & single neuron activity was recorded as spike generated on an oscilloscope. Betahistine mesylate was intravenously injected at cumulative doses of 0.1, 1 & 5 mg/kg at 20 min intervals. Betahistine was also administered iontophoretically, i.e. directly by means of an electric current & effect on spike generation was observed. Results :Spike generation of monosynaptic neurons remain unaffected by i.v. & iontophoretic administration of Betahistine. Spike generation of polysynaptic I neurons was inhibited by i.v. Betahistine in a dose-dependent manner (As in graph). Spike generation of polysynaptic I neurons was also inhibited by iontophoretic admin. of Betahistine in a dose-dependent manner (not shown in graph).
<number>
Dose-dependent inhibitory effect of Betahistine on spike generation of LVN neurons was similar with both i.v. & iontophoretic application. This suggests that inhibition is due to direct action of the drug on polysynaptic neurons, not resulting from an indirect effect such as increase in blood flow in brain stem.
<number>
Study design: double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over, multicenter. No. of patients : 114 patients suffering from paroxysmal vertigo attacks of various origin Treatment period : 2 treatment periods of 5 wks each. Grp I (n=38) Betahistine (16 mg t.i.d) for 1st period , then identical placebo for 2 nd period . Grp II :(n=44). Two treatments in reverse order. Results :analyzed in 82 patients. As shown in graph, during 1 st treatment period, Betahistine gave a significant improvement in contrast to placebo. When patients crossed over from Betahistine to placebo, no further improvement could be found. While crossing over from placebo, Betahistine gave a better result although not significant. (p= 0.06). Comparison of all Betahistine treatment periods with placebo showed a significant change in frequency of attacks in favor of Betahistine (p = 0.006). Thus Betahistine treatment provides prophylactic effect by causing significant reduction in frequency of attacks which could be explained by modulation of cerebral & labyrinthine circulation.
<number>
As shown in graph, during 1 st treatment period, Betahistine significantly diminished severity of attacks while placebo did not. After crossing over Betahistine gave further , though not significant, improvement while placebo gave a slight deterioration . Comparison of all Betahistine treatment periods with placebo showed a significant difference in favor of Betahistine (p= 0.02) with respect to change in severity of attacks. Betahistine treatment thus provides symptomatic effect by reducing severity of attacks which may be explained by inhibition of vestibular nuclei firing.
<number>
Study Design : double-blind, multicenter
No. of patients : 81 with recurrent paroxysmal vertigo attacks with or without cochlear symptoms typical of Meniere’s disease.
Treatment period of 90 days with either Betahistine (dosage 16 mg t.i.d. = 48 mg/d) or identical placebo
Results were analyzed in 72 patients (36 Betahistine , 36 Placebo)
The average monthly intensity expressed according to a scale increased gradually from a score of 1 (simple discomfort ) to 5 ( bedridden) showed a numerical decrease which was always in favor of Betahistine as compared with placebo (as shown in graph). This difference was statistically significant on day 90 (p= 0.02). After 3 months of treatment , the patients with Betahistine had an average intensity score of 0.53 while those with placebo had an average score of 1.79 .
<number>
At the three examination times on day 30, day 60 & day 90, the patients who no longer had vertigo symptoms were recorded for each treatment group. From the first month onwards, twice the no. of patients were in remission with Betahistine than with placebo. The results were always in favor of Betahistine. The positive results increased with the duration of the treatment. After 3 months of treatment , nearly three quarters of the patients treated with Betahistine no longer had vertigo symptoms.
<number>
Following ref. Shows that Betahistine increases cochlear blood flow in a dose-dependent manner. -- Laurikainen EA et al, Am.J. Otol, (1993),14,1
Hence dose-dependent effect of Betahistine in vascular effect, neuron activity, & on nystagmus is shown. Hence higher the dose, better & faster are the effects of Betahistine. Also Betahistine 16 mg t.i.d. is more effective than 8 mg t.i.d..
This dose-dependent effect of Betahistine implies that by doubling the dose of Betahistine from 8 mg t.i.d. to 16 mg t.i.d. , faster & better will be its effect.
<number>
Study Design : double-blind , randomized
No. of subjects : 10 normal subjects 23-30 yrs. of age
Method : Vestibular nystagmus was induced by means of a torsion swing. The oscillation time of the swing was kept constant .Each individual received 3 different single oral doses of Betahistine (8, 16, & 32 mg) on 3 different occasions with an inter-test interval of 1 wk.
Assessment :The duration of nystagmus, following drug administration was calculated as a % of pre-treatment duration. The duration of nystagmus was measured before administration of the drug & at 1/2 , 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 hr. after.
<number>
The graph shows that Betahistine reduces duration of nystagmus in a dose-dependent manner. 16 mg Betahistine was more effective (p< 0.0005) in reducing duration of nystagmus (mean reduction 48 %) than 8 mg Betahistine (mean reduction 35 %). Further 32 mg Betahistine was more effective (p< 0.0005) (mean reduction 59 %) than 16 mg Betahistine.
Also note, higher the dose, faster is the action of Betahistine. This can be explained by considering any particular % reduction in duration of nystagmus, say 20 % reduction (i.e. 80 % of the initial duration of nystagmus), time required by 32 mg Betahistine is lesser than that for 16 mg which in turn is lesser than that for 8 mg. Hence higher the dose of Betahistine, better & faster is its action.
<number>
This American study determined the side effects which may occur with Betahistine. No. of subjects : 10 normal captive males Treatment period :Gr. I (n=5) Betahistine 4 x 4 mg daily, Gr. II (n=5) Betahistine 4 x 12 mg daily , both for 60 days. Assessment parameters : blood pressure, pulse etc. Each patient was interrogated daily & the sitting blood pressure , pulse etc. was recorded before & after 60 days of medication. Results :The above graph represents the systolic & diastolic blood pressure before & after 60 days of medication. The average of all the 10 subjects is considered. There were no changes of statistical significance in blood pressure, pulse after treatment with Betahistine. Hence Betahistine does not cause any adverse side effects which will affect CVS.
Whole labyrinth was isolated from frog.Posterior canal with ampullary nerve was micro-dissected free and bathed in artificial periplymph fluid. Nerve firing rate ( both in resting and evoked ) from ampullary nerve was recorded.
3 Betahistine metabolites were administered to the preparation by perfusion of bath. M1 (aminpethyl pyridine), M2 (hydroxyethyl pyridine), M3 (pyridyl acetic acid).
Vertigo is generally produced by imbalance or sudden, uncontrolled vestibular firing activity. Hence it is desirable that antivertigo drug should reduce the resting firing rate. Evoked response is the firing or impulse which gives information on the stimuli e.g. sudden head movement etc. Hence to maintain the normal vestibular sensitivity it is desirable that antivertigo drug should not hamper the evoked response.
The two metabolites M2 and M3 were completely inactive. Only one metabolite M1 was effective or active. M1 produced the progressive reduction in the ampullar resting firing rate without affecting evoked response.
This study being the research study in this field, we can not comment whether dosage adjustment is possible with Betahistine since Metabolite is active. Future studies in this area may focus more details on this aspect.
This open prospective study was carried out as an out patient trial. All patients received 16 mg tds for 6 weeks or earlier till remission of attacks. Any other antivertigo medication was stopped. Patients were included one week after stoppage of the earlier therapy.
Global evaluation: Patients as well as clinicians assessed the overall efficacy of the treatment, tolerance, effect on associated symptoms on a four-point scale as excellent, fair, good poor.
Overall 29 patients were analyzed. The above are the scores of the 3 parameters frequency, duration, severity of vertigo attacks. Kindly note that by week 3, almost 95 % reduction is seen in all the 3 parameters. A statistically significant improvement was seen from the first month itself.
The most interesting aspect of this study was the sub-group analysis of patients with severe vertigo attacks at baseline. (n=18). Kinldy note that the earlier graph shows results of all (acute attacks) the 29 patients in the study. While this table and graph shows the results of only 18 patients with sever vertigo attacks at baseline.
A statistically significant improvement was seen from 1 st week itself in these acute vertigo cases with Betahistine. By week 3 all the patients with acute or severe vertigo attacks were completely free of attacks.
This graph shows the improvement of patients with sever or acute attacks at baseline (n=18) ( for values refer the table on earlier slide). By week 3 all the patients with acute attacks were completely free of vertigo.
Both physicians as well as patients rated the overall efficacy and tolerance of the treatment to be excellent to good in 100 % patients. Effect on associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting was rated as excellent to good in 95 % patients.
The rating of both physicians and patients is equivalent . This indicated that there was no placebo effect.
15 patients suffered from tinnitus at baseline. 14 patients completely relieved after 2 weeks of therapy. On completing 3 weeks of therapy, no patient was complaining of tinnitus.
Six patient complained of nausea and vomiting. Treatment with Betahistine relieved this associated symptom on completing just 1 week of therapy.
Dr. Krishna , H.O.D. - Nuclear Medicine is very well known in his field. Dr. Kirtane , H.O.D. ENT dept. is an eminent neurotologist in India. Hinduja Hospital is one of the well recognized hospital in Mumbai. This study was published in Neurology India. This prestigious journal is indexed journal and an official publication of Neurological society of India (N.S. I.).
Vertigo due to vascular insufficiency to brain is very common. SPECT (Single Photon Emisssion Computed Tomography) is emerging as a powerful diagnostic tool for vertigo in nucleaar medicine.
Betahistine an antivertigo drug known worldover is shown to increase cochlear micirculation .Old clincial studies have also shown that it increase scerebral blood flow in patients with VBI (vertebrobasilar insufficiency) . This present study was undertaken to detect and quantify the hypoperfused areas in vertigo patients, to assess the effects of Betahistine in improving this hypoerfusion to brain using SPECT
Brain SPECT uses a lipophilic molecule such as HMPAO ( hexa methyl propylene amine oxime) that crosses the blood brain barrier. It is labeled with a conventional single photon emitters such as Technetium (Tc). The labeled molecule 99m -Tc- HMPAO is lipophilic and crosses the blood brain barrier. Brain uptake is proportional to blood perfusion to brain.The physical decay of this compound leads to emission of single photons directly from radionuclide.
SPECT instrument comprises a gamma camera that detects single photons. The SPECT imaging device collects information in a 360o circle around the brain and generates a three-dimensional image that can be displayed in a transaxial, coronal and sagittal views.
The image display uses a radiographic grey scale or can be converted to a color scale. For clinical purposes,a qualitative image locating the areas is important. For quantitaive purposes, the blood flow can be be measured in particular region as region of Interest.
<number>
Study Design : double-blind , crossover,
No.of patients:88 patients with peripheral vertigo of unknown origin
Two treatment periods of 3 months each . Grp I Betahistine (24 mg t.i.d.for 1st period then Cinnarizine 30 mg t.i.d. in 2nd period. Grp II :reverse order Assessment : Severity, duration,intensity of attacks, side effects. Results : Both drugs were equally effective in reducing severity & duration of attacks. As shown in the graph, Betahistine was significantly better in reducing the no. of attacks.When patients crossed over from Betahistine to Cinnarizine , they suffered a sharp increase in no. of attacks during 1 st month. , there was a small decrease in 2 nd & 3 rd month , but frequency was still double of that achieved after 3 months on Betahistine. When patients crossed over from Cinnarizine to Betahistine, frequency of attacks continued to decrease. Comparing last two months of each treatments, frequency of attacks with Betahistine treatment was significantly less (p=0.025) than that with Cinnarizine.
<number>
Polysynaptic I neurons is one of the sites involved in the occurrence of vertigo. Vertigo is generally produced by imbalance in bilateral vestibular function or massive impulses from peripheral organs. Antivertigo action of Betahistine could be explained as inhibition of massive impulses to the polysynaptic neurons of the LVN.
In contrast to Betahistine, Cinnarizine produced an enhancement of responsiveness of LVN mono & polysynaptic neurons in a non dose-dependent manner. Hence Cinnarizine may prevent vestibular disorders such as vertigo by increasing cerebral blood flow , but not by directly exciting LVN neurons.
Betahistine has the benefit of giving dose-dependent effect which is not the case with Cinnarizine.
With the both the tests, effects of Betahistine could not be distinguished from those of placebo. Even at high doses, Betahistine did not appear to impair driving performance. By contrast, Prochlorperazine, impaired driving performance, casuinb increased carelessness, (hitting more cones as shown above), errors of judgement (trying to drive between the cones which were not wide enough apart), some slowong of response.
Improtantly the subjects were usually unawre of their impaired performance whilest on Procholrperazine.
As shown above, while on betahistine, there were 5.5 cones hit, and 4.0 when on placebo. With Procholrperazine, there were 9.0 cones hit.
<number>
Betahistine offers all the benefits expected from a true Antivertigo drug.
It has proven efficacy of improving cochlear , cerebral blood flow, normalizing firing frequency of vestibular nuclei & hence provides faster & better relief to vertigo patients.
It has a dose-dependent effect.
Betahistine is well tolerated & does not cause drowsiness.
The interesting aspect is that it allows the normal adaptation process in vertigo patients.