There is no greater issue facing our Republic today than Federal Tyranny. If we work together we can save our individual liberties and sovereignty, the sovereignty for each State and the Republic (all the States collectively), and most importantly save our Constitution!

1. THE IRREFUTABLE ARGUMENT
FOR REPUBLIC REVIEW

2. In accordance with Article Seven of the Constitution,
the Constitution is a compact written “for” and “by”
the States.
• The legal definition of “ratification” is: “the action of signing
or giving formal consent to a treaty, compact, contract, or
agreement, making it officially valid”
• For the compact to be given force it required a threshold of
“Shareholders” to buy-into the compact (State’s); thus,
making the States the only parties to the compact
• This is why Madison, Jefferson, and the framers consistently
referred to the Constitution as a compact, contract, or
instrument

3. In accordance with Article Seven and Article Five of the
Constitution, the States are THE principal Shareholders of
this compact. Consequently, ONLY the States possess
SOVEREIGNTY over the compact; thus:
• Only the States could ratify the Constitution
• Only the States possess the authority to ratify amendments
• Conversely, the Constitution does not grant the authority to
the Supreme Court, the President, or Congress to ratify the
Constitution or the authority to Amendment to the
Constitution; therefore they are not PRINCIPAL Parties to this
compact

4. In accordance with the Ninth and Tenth Amendments,
the States are the SOVEREIGNS who possess
Supremacy over all things not delegated to the
general (i.e. Federal) government within the compact
and possess the full authority of oversight over their
compact
• The general government supremacy is limited to ONLY those
objects/powers delegated by the States within the Compact
to the general government, ratified amendments to the
Constitution and constitutionally ratified Treaties (See Article
Six Section Two and the Ratification Debates)

5. The general government’s treaty authority is
limited to the enumerated powers
• For example, if the States have not formally delegated the
power to the general government to regulate environmental
matters, the general government cannot enter into treaties
over environmental matters

6. Accordingly, the States delegated specific,
defined and limited ROLES, RESPONSIBILITIES,
AND POWERS (RRPs) within the compact (i.e.
Constitution) to the general government and the
general government is constrained per the
compact from doing ANYTHING that was not
specifically delegated to it within the compact.
(See Article Six Section Two, and the Ninth and
Tenth Amendments)

7. The only way the general government can
constitutionally obtain a new RRP is by
requesting that the States delegate the desired
RRP to them (the general government) via an
Amendment to the Constitution in accordance
with the mode identified within the Constitution
(i.e. the amendment process).

8. The “General Defense and Welfare,” “Commerce,”
“Necessary and Proper,” and “Supremacy” clauses are
not ambiguous portals for the general government to
assume new RRP’s. These clauses only apply to the
RRPs enumerated in the Constitution and
Amendments to the Constitution that have been
ratified and Treaties constitutionally ratified by two
thirds of the Senate
(See Article Six, The Ratification Debates, Madison’s
Veto of the 1817 Bonus Bill, and Federalist Papers)

9. This is why when the general government needed to
make a minuscule change to the electoral college in
how they are to choose the President, they adhered
strictly to the Constitutional process and amended the
Constitution instead of using statutes, regulations, or
laws to govern this process
(see the Twelfth Amendment)
This is also why the States who sought to reign in the
Supreme Courts jurisdictions demanded the Eleventh
Amendment.

10. Therefore, all RRP’s being exercised that cannot
be found within the Constitution and the ratified
Amendments are blatant violations of the
Constitution and usurpations of States’ RRPs and
sovereignty
(See Ratification Debates, Madison’s Veto of the
Bonus Bill, and the Federalist Papers)

11. For almost two centuries the general government and
public servants at all levels have failed to comply with
the Constitution as ratified and now our Republic is in
grave peril due to these usurpations.
Inherent within contract law is the ability of the
principal Shareholders of a compact to audit their
compact for compliance and enforcement

12. Therefore, only the States possess the authority to –
and MUST - validate all RRP’s being exercised by the
general government to confirm that all RRPs that have
been established since the 1789 ratification of the
Constitution, were properly delegated by the States
by adhering to the Constitutional Amendment process
(See the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions of 1798)

13. Politicians, Jurists, Lawyers, Officers, officials, professors, and
persons claiming profound understanding of the Constitution
within and outside of the general government since 1791 have used
lies, deceit, and collusion to convince the States and their citizens
to allow the general government the unconstitutional ability to
assume unconstitutional RRPs without following the codified (i.e.
systematic) process within the Constitution
(See The Ratification Debates and James Madison’s Veto of the 1817
Bonus Bill, James Monroe’s May 4, 1822 Veto of "An act for the
preservation and repair of the Cumberland road," and Andrew
Jackson’s May 27, 1830 Veto of the Infrastructure Development Bill)

14. This MUST be done in a formal audit process.
• Only the original three Executive Departments (i.e. State,
Treasury, and Defense) and the general accounting office
were defined by the framers as necessary and proper within
the enumerated RRPs when the general government was
established; consequently, all other RRPs would require an
Amendment to the Constitution to be a valid RRP.
• If there is no Amendment for the RRP being exercised (i.e.
Department, Agency, Office, or administrative entity) then
these RRPs and entities are unconstitutional and direct
violations of the compact.

15. To ensure that this audit has the full force of the
Republic, a simple majority of States that provide a
majority of representation in both houses of Congress
must coalesce and work together exercising their
authority as “the principal Parties of the compact” to
rebuke the general government and use the “necessary
measures” of political force within the Constitution to
gain compliance with their compact by the general
government.

16. It is preferred that all States in the Republic participate
in Republic Review and it is anticipated that over 30
States will join in Republic Review, but currently only 27
States are necessary to obtain Representative control in
Congress to exert the necessary political force.
(See Article IV and the Fourteenth Amendment of the
Constitution)

17. The States participating in Republic Review will
provide clear directives to the general
government requiring that they produce the
necessary legislative measures to disband and
dissolve all unconstitutional RRP’s one at time.

18. THIS PROCESS OR METHODOLOGY AMONGST THE
STATES ASSERTING THEIR POWERS IS NOT:
• Applying to Congress in accordance with Article Five of the
Constitution to convene a Convention to amend the Constitution (See
Article Five, the Ratification Debates, and the Republic Review
Process Model);thus, the States are asserting their authority as “The
Principle Shareholders” over their Constitution.
• This is why ALL States seeking to participate in the Republic Review
process who possess an active Article V petition calling for a
Constitutional Convention, must formally rescind this petition, to
send a clear message that they are seeking and asserting their
Constitutional authority over the compact to obtain full compliance
to their compact and not seeking any changes to the Constitution.

19. Consequently, the unified Republic, while conducting Republic
Review, will not possess the Constitutional powers to amend
the Constitution in any way.
• Republic Review is simply exercising their authority
individually and collectively to validate and demand
compliance to their Constitution (See Kentucky Resolutions
of 1798 and 1799 and the Ratification Debates, Madison’s
Report on the Virginia Resolutions of 1800 and Madison’s
Notes on Nullification of 1834)
• Furthermore, this audit by the Republic for Republic Review
does not require Congress to appoint a place or time to
conduct the audit and Republic Review process.

20. • Republic Review is what Madison and Jefferson attempted to
accomplish with interposition in 1798 through their Kentucky and
Virginia Resolutions in response to the Alien and Sedition Acts and as
further explained by James Madison in his Report on the Virginia
Resolutions of 1800 and his Notes on Nullification of 1834
• Jefferson first audited the Constitution in the Kentucky Resolutions of
1798
• Madison called for the State to fulfill their duty to protect their State
and citizen from despotic government calling on the other States
“that the necessary and proper measures will be taken by each, for
co-operating with this state, in maintaining the Authorities, Rights,
and Liberties, referred the States respectively, or to the people.” (See
Virginia Resolution of 1798 and James Madison, Report on the
Virginia Resolutions 1800 and Madison’s Notes on Nullification of
1834)

21. • Their fellow States failed to fulfill their obligation of
oversight over their compact/contract which is why
Madison and Jefferson were not successful in conducting
Republic Review and why Jefferson lamented in the
Kentucky Resolution of 1799 and Madison defended the
legal and Constitutionality of their Resolutions in his Report
on the Virginia Resolutions of 1800 and his Notes on
Nullification of 1834
• The first and obvious action was the audit and to get
organized followed by Madison’s call for interposition of
these Act’s and not nullification
• In harmony with Madison and Jefferson’s actions the audit
only requires one State to initiate and call for Republic
Review (See Republic Review Process Model)

22. The requirement for a full review with ALL States in
the process is to verify:
• ALL amendments that have been ratified have been done so
Constitutionally by each of the States
• ANY judicial ruling that has been construed as law must
identify each of those laws as unconstitutional
• ANY executive order that creates and or enforces a law that
is not in pursuance to the Constitution and not congruent
with laws made by Congress is not a law and must be
revoked