SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
The Roles of ELL2 and ELL3 in Plasma Cell Development
Shane McKeon and Aleksandra Basina Christine Milcarek
First Experiences in Research, Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pittsburgh
Abstract
The Lenti Virus
DiscussionIdentifying ELL2 and ELL3
Acknowledgements
B cells express immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules composed of heavy and light chains on their surfaces; after
antigen or LPS stimulation they differentiate into antibody secreting plasma cells (ASCs) that make and secrete large
amounts of the Ig protein. One of the primary processes to influence the shift to Ig secretion is differential Ig heavy
chain RNA polyadenylation and splicing. We showed in unpublished data that the small nuclear RNAs important for
splicing are reduced in ASCs relative to B cells (Carew & Smith, personal communication). Previous studies showed
that (a.) the transcription elongation factor ELL2 is induced with differentiation to ASCs, (b.) conditional deletion of
ELL2 results in decreased Ig heavy chain secretory-specific mRNA production and diminished Ig secretion in the whole
animal and (c.) after LPS stimulation of B cells ELL3 decreases and ELL1 is unchanged (1). The ELL3 and ELL1 and
2 proteins are closely related in structure but ELL3 lacks the interior ~100 amino acids (2). The ELL proteins have been
shown to be involved in at least two transcription elongation complexes, the little elongation complex (LEC) involved
with small nuclear RNAs, and the super elongation complex (SEC) important for the bulk of genes transcribed in
Drosophila and human cancer cell lines (3). However, the differential involvement of ELL2 versus ELL3 was not
explored. We then hypothesized that the transition in expression of ELL3 to ELL2 is important in the development of B
cells into ASCs, and would influence both Ig secretory mRNA expression and small RNA synthesis. The Milcarek
Laboratory is using Quantitative PCR (QPCR), western blots and complementation of defects in knockout mice to
display the relationships. The research this semester was primarily focused on seeing whether or not ELL1, 2 and 3 had
similar functions. To do so, we first needed to test our cell lines to make sure we had the correct antibodies, and grow a
virus that could be used to correct deficiencies in the immunoglobulin secretion abilities of splenic B cells from ELL2
conditional knockout mice.
We began with two cell lines, MM1.S containing only ELL2, and SKW6.4 containing only ELL3. In order to
provide concrete support that these cells line expressed the desired proteins we ran a QPCR which showed that SKW6.4
does indeed contain ELL3 while MM1.S does not (Figure 1). Furthermore, a western blot was run using antibodies
complimentary to ELL2. Once the blot was transferred to a membrane and imaged with chemiluminescence, it was clear
that MM1.S contains ELL2, while SKW6.4 did not. (Figure 2)
Moving forward, Lenti virus DNA will be packaged and placed into knockout mice cells (contains no ELL2) and wild
type mice cells (contains ELL2). The cells without ELL2 should produce no immunoglobulin secretion as their immune
system has been compromised. ELL1, ELL2 and ELL3 will then be individually added to the knockout cells. It is
expected that ELL2 will correct this defect, however, the main purpose of this experiment is to see if ELL1 and/or ELL3
will also correct the defect. If so, it will prove that ELL1 and/or ELL3 have similar if not the same function within the
immune system. Future directions will involve characterizations of the LECs and SECs for B versus ASCs.
We would like to acknowledge Christine Milcarek for guiding us through this research and supporting our
love for research. Also we would like to thank FER for this experience.
Background Information
When B cells differentiate into antibody secreting cells many genes are
affected but little information is known. In a previous study, Dr.
Milcarek found that there were changes in the expression of small
nuclear RNA; an important component in splicing out introns from pre-
RNA to form mature mRNA. Additionally, it was found that ELL3
levels are diminished after stimulation from B cells to ASC. As seen in
the figure to the right, ELL3 is much lower in ASCs than B cells, while
ELL2 is much lower in B cells than ASCs. This information led to
looking into how snRNA is controlled during the transition from B cells
to ASCs.
It was hypothesized that ELL3 regulates the formation of SECs and
LECs in B cells while ELL2 drives the formation of the SECs over the
LECs when producing antibodies. It is this switch that benefits mRNA
instead of snRNA.
To test the hypothesis, we wanted to see if the down regulation of snRNA was
linked to the down regulation of ELL3. Naïve splenic cells will be stimulated
with LPS and then treated with inhibitors of protein synthesis or RNA
synthesis and the production of ELL3 and snRNA will be monitored. Prior to
doing so, the research mainly focused on identifying which cell lines contained
ELL2 vs ELL3 so that we could be sure we had the correct genes.
Additionally, we decided to grow a lenti virus that would be placed into ELL2
knockout splenic B cells. We would then inject the ELL proteins one at a time
and see if one, or all could correct the deficiency, by monitoring the
immunoglobulin secretion.
The image to the left shows the similarities and differences between all three
ELL proteins on a molecular level. As you can see most of ELL3’s DNA
sequence is unknown and the parts that are shown are similar to the other ELL
genes, suggesting a similarity between the genes functions.
10
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
10
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
To obtain a virus to transfect into the splenic B cells we ordered bacteria that
contained a lenti virus, but needed to test if the sample actually contained the
desired virus. The sample came with a plasmid map (as seen to the left) , that
showed what enzymes would cut the plasmid, and at what locations. For our
purposes we choose three enzymes, EcoR1, Sac1 and Sal1. These enzymes
were predicted to produce segments of the plasmid at 6973 and 3401 for
EcoR1, 2960, 191, 7223 for Sac1 and 1618, 2185, 6571 for Sal1. To test if our
lenti virus would be cut in the appropriate locations, we mixed the enzymes
with their complementary buffers and the DNA and ran each enzyme on a DNA
gel , with three different samples of the lenti virus. In the gels below, lanes 6,
12, and 16 contain the lenti virus uncut, so serve as a control.
Lanes 7, 13, and 17 contain the lenti virus cut
with the EcoR1 enzyme and came out to be
around 6000 kDa, as expected.
Lanes 8, 14,and 18 contain the Sac1 enzyme and
as seen in lanes 14 and 18, two bands appeared,
one around 7000 kDa and another around 3000
kDa. Additionally, lane 8 contains the band at
7000 kDa and another very faint band around
200 kDa. All three of these bands were expected
when cutting the plasmid with sac1.
Lanes 9, 15 and 19 contain the lentu virus cut
with Sal1 and all three lanes contain three bands
around the 6000 kDa mark, the 2000 kDa and
the 1000 kDa mark. All three values are
consistent with the predicted values provided by
the plasmid map.
In order to confirm that the MM1.S cell line contained ELL2 while the SKW6.4
cell line did not, we ran a protein gel and western blot. Because the MM1.S cells
were ASCs we expected a much large abundance in ELL2 than in the B cells
(SKW6.4). In order to test the results the gel was transferred to a western blot and
coated with a primary antibody that was complementary for ELL2 overnight. It
was then washed and a anti- ELL2 secondary antibody was placed on the
membrane. We were then able to expose the membrane to chemiluminescence
and received the image to the left.
The expected molecular weight of ELL2 is 72 kDa. As seen in the image there
are thick bands within the ASC lanes that are near 72 kDa, as seen on the protein
ladder next to the membrane image. Additionally, there are no bands around 72
kDa under the B cell lanes, proving that ELL2 is expressed in ASCs but not B
cells.
PCR is typically used to amplify a specific gene, or portion of gene, so that we can
study the function of that gene or gene region. In our experiments, we amplify the
lentiviral DNA that contains a vector with the gene eGFP (green fluorescent protein)
as well as ELL3. Primers are used to flank the region you want to amplify. Each
primer will amplify the gene sequence on both strands, creating a double-stranded
gene product. The primers we used are represented at the figure below.
The PCR process follows 3 steps. Denaturation step: First, you heat the DNA to a
high temperature (95 °C) so that the two strands of genomic DNA, and later PCR
DNA, separate. Annealing step: Second, you reduce the temperature (around 60 °C)
so that DNA primers bind to either end of the template that you want to amplify. It
is important that you have two primers, one to bind
to each strand of DNA. Extension Step: Third, you
raise the temperature to about 70 °C to activate a
DNA polymerase and elongate the primer with
respect to the template strand.
Over the course of the semester in the Milcarek lab, we were
ultimately able to lay the ground work for further testing of whether
genes ELL1 and ELL3 have similar function in the immune response
to that of the gene ELL2.
We were able to ensure that the MM1.S cell line contained only
ELL2 and the SKW6.4 cell line contained only ELL3 through
quantitative PCR analysis as well as western blots using antibodies
known to be complimentary to ELL2 (and therefore able to detect its
presence). In addition, we were able to confirm that the lenti viral
vector containing our genes of interest were present in the bacterial
host, and therefore could be used to transfect into B cells of
conditional knockout mice.
References
1. Park, K. S., Bayles, I., Szlachta-McGinn, A., Paul, J., Boiko, J., Santos, P., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Borghesi, L.,
and Milcarek, C. (2014) J. Immunol. 193, 4663-4674
2. Miller, T., Williams, K., Johnstone, R. W., and Shilatifard, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32052-32056
3. Luo, Z., Lin, C., and Shilatifard, A. (2012) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 543-547
4. Sage M. Smith, Nolan T. Carew, and Christine Milcarek Department of Immunology, University of
Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States
Recall that B cells differentiate into antibody secreting plasma cells (ASCs) upon stimulation by an antigen or
lipopolysaccharide (LPS). ASCs make and secrete vast amounts of immunoglobulin molecules (Ig), and that this
is influenced by differential IG heavy chain RNA polyadenylation and splicing.
Also recall that ELL2 is the only gene of the three ELL genes that has previously been shown to act directly on
immunoglobulin genes. It has so far been established that ELL2 is induced at least 10-fold in antibody secreting
cells in comparison to B cells, while ELL1 expression decreases slightly and ELL3 expression decreases
tremendously. In turn, such changes cause the RNA polymerase II in antibody secreting cells to take on different
properties, ultimately resulting in changes concerning RNA processing and modification of histones (4).
Continued research will focus on the role of ELL1 and ELL3 and whether they may substitute ELL2 in such
functions.
In the future, the lenti virus containing the gene of
interest will be transfected into cells of conditional
knockout mice. This will test whether ELL1 and/or
ELL3 can have similar functionality as that
exhibited by ELL2. In addition, further research
may lead to characterization and analysis of the
long elongation complexes (LECs) and the short
elongation complexes (SECs) present in B cells as
opposed to in ASCs.

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

2014 BDSRA Micsenyi LINCL and JNCL
2014 BDSRA Micsenyi LINCL and JNCL2014 BDSRA Micsenyi LINCL and JNCL
2014 BDSRA Micsenyi LINCL and JNCL
 
Ab diversity
Ab diversityAb diversity
Ab diversity
 
2012 CLN5 Boustany
2012 CLN5 Boustany2012 CLN5 Boustany
2012 CLN5 Boustany
 
Ab diversity
Ab diversityAb diversity
Ab diversity
 
Masters Thesis Research
Masters Thesis ResearchMasters Thesis Research
Masters Thesis Research
 
Antibody class switch ppt
Antibody class switch pptAntibody class switch ppt
Antibody class switch ppt
 
Antibody
AntibodyAntibody
Antibody
 
Central dogma of life
Central dogma of lifeCentral dogma of life
Central dogma of life
 
Development of an_immunogenicity_score_for_hla-dq_
Development of an_immunogenicity_score_for_hla-dq_Development of an_immunogenicity_score_for_hla-dq_
Development of an_immunogenicity_score_for_hla-dq_
 
120802_NC_My Poster
120802_NC_My Poster120802_NC_My Poster
120802_NC_My Poster
 
Vlincl tuxworth
Vlincl tuxworthVlincl tuxworth
Vlincl tuxworth
 
ANTIBODY STRUCTURE AD GENE REARRANGEMENTS
ANTIBODY STRUCTURE AD GENE REARRANGEMENTSANTIBODY STRUCTURE AD GENE REARRANGEMENTS
ANTIBODY STRUCTURE AD GENE REARRANGEMENTS
 
Generation of Antibody Diversity- Quick revision from Kuby through presentation
Generation of Antibody Diversity- Quick revision from Kuby through presentationGeneration of Antibody Diversity- Quick revision from Kuby through presentation
Generation of Antibody Diversity- Quick revision from Kuby through presentation
 
Transcriptomics and lexico-syntactic analysis
Transcriptomics and lexico-syntactic analysisTranscriptomics and lexico-syntactic analysis
Transcriptomics and lexico-syntactic analysis
 
Genetic code
Genetic codeGenetic code
Genetic code
 
Poster
PosterPoster
Poster
 
Alk positive lymphoma
Alk positive lymphomaAlk positive lymphoma
Alk positive lymphoma
 
Antibody1111111111111111111
Antibody1111111111111111111Antibody1111111111111111111
Antibody1111111111111111111
 
Antibody diversity presentation
Antibody diversity presentationAntibody diversity presentation
Antibody diversity presentation
 
Antibody diversity
Antibody diversityAntibody diversity
Antibody diversity
 

Similar to FER poster

Bs963 apoptosis 09-10
Bs963 apoptosis 09-10Bs963 apoptosis 09-10
Bs963 apoptosis 09-10antavait
 
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSION
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSIONResearch Day Poster FINAL VERSION
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSIONAnastasia Pimenova
 
Poster-Kelly Berger
Poster-Kelly BergerPoster-Kelly Berger
Poster-Kelly BergerKelly Berger
 
Sejal Mistry IAB poster
Sejal Mistry IAB posterSejal Mistry IAB poster
Sejal Mistry IAB posterSejal Mistry
 
Youngetal2021complete.pdf
Youngetal2021complete.pdfYoungetal2021complete.pdf
Youngetal2021complete.pdfAndreaCerase3
 
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604deepak deshkar
 
Undergraduate Research Grant
Undergraduate Research GrantUndergraduate Research Grant
Undergraduate Research GrantKaitlin Zoccola
 
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptx
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptxOccludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptx
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptxUlik4
 
Cell communication and signaling
Cell communication and signalingCell communication and signaling
Cell communication and signalingshru1604
 
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor Cells
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor CellsNuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor Cells
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor CellsStephanie Clark
 
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)cursohemoderivados
 
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...Munna Yadav
 
IL23R splice mutations
IL23R splice mutationsIL23R splice mutations
IL23R splice mutationsShih-hsin Kan
 
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114x
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114xAbstract piis0022202 x1831114x
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114xWaddah Moghram
 
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docxmercysuttle
 

Similar to FER poster (20)

Bs963 apoptosis 09-10
Bs963 apoptosis 09-10Bs963 apoptosis 09-10
Bs963 apoptosis 09-10
 
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSION
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSIONResearch Day Poster FINAL VERSION
Research Day Poster FINAL VERSION
 
Poster-Kelly Berger
Poster-Kelly BergerPoster-Kelly Berger
Poster-Kelly Berger
 
Marta kaleta
Marta kaletaMarta kaleta
Marta kaleta
 
Sejal Mistry IAB poster
Sejal Mistry IAB posterSejal Mistry IAB poster
Sejal Mistry IAB poster
 
review articles
review articlesreview articles
review articles
 
ncomms8077
ncomms8077ncomms8077
ncomms8077
 
Youngetal2021complete.pdf
Youngetal2021complete.pdfYoungetal2021complete.pdf
Youngetal2021complete.pdf
 
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604
Hla typi ng pg seminar final 0604
 
Undergraduate Research Grant
Undergraduate Research GrantUndergraduate Research Grant
Undergraduate Research Grant
 
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptx
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptxOccludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptx
Occludin stalls HCV particle dynamics.pptx
 
Cell communication and signaling
Cell communication and signalingCell communication and signaling
Cell communication and signaling
 
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor Cells
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor CellsNuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor Cells
Nuclear Transport And Its Effect On Breast Cancer Tumor Cells
 
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)
Inmunoglobulinas copia.key (1)
 
CDD 2016
CDD 2016CDD 2016
CDD 2016
 
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...
CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING: Current Technology, Perspectives and Generation of iP...
 
IL23R splice mutations
IL23R splice mutationsIL23R splice mutations
IL23R splice mutations
 
2014 BDSRA Stein and Davidson JNCL
2014 BDSRA Stein and Davidson JNCL2014 BDSRA Stein and Davidson JNCL
2014 BDSRA Stein and Davidson JNCL
 
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114x
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114xAbstract piis0022202 x1831114x
Abstract piis0022202 x1831114x
 
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx
1 At least 2 questions from this section will be on the .docx
 

FER poster

  • 1. The Roles of ELL2 and ELL3 in Plasma Cell Development Shane McKeon and Aleksandra Basina Christine Milcarek First Experiences in Research, Dietrich School of Arts & Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Abstract The Lenti Virus DiscussionIdentifying ELL2 and ELL3 Acknowledgements B cells express immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules composed of heavy and light chains on their surfaces; after antigen or LPS stimulation they differentiate into antibody secreting plasma cells (ASCs) that make and secrete large amounts of the Ig protein. One of the primary processes to influence the shift to Ig secretion is differential Ig heavy chain RNA polyadenylation and splicing. We showed in unpublished data that the small nuclear RNAs important for splicing are reduced in ASCs relative to B cells (Carew & Smith, personal communication). Previous studies showed that (a.) the transcription elongation factor ELL2 is induced with differentiation to ASCs, (b.) conditional deletion of ELL2 results in decreased Ig heavy chain secretory-specific mRNA production and diminished Ig secretion in the whole animal and (c.) after LPS stimulation of B cells ELL3 decreases and ELL1 is unchanged (1). The ELL3 and ELL1 and 2 proteins are closely related in structure but ELL3 lacks the interior ~100 amino acids (2). The ELL proteins have been shown to be involved in at least two transcription elongation complexes, the little elongation complex (LEC) involved with small nuclear RNAs, and the super elongation complex (SEC) important for the bulk of genes transcribed in Drosophila and human cancer cell lines (3). However, the differential involvement of ELL2 versus ELL3 was not explored. We then hypothesized that the transition in expression of ELL3 to ELL2 is important in the development of B cells into ASCs, and would influence both Ig secretory mRNA expression and small RNA synthesis. The Milcarek Laboratory is using Quantitative PCR (QPCR), western blots and complementation of defects in knockout mice to display the relationships. The research this semester was primarily focused on seeing whether or not ELL1, 2 and 3 had similar functions. To do so, we first needed to test our cell lines to make sure we had the correct antibodies, and grow a virus that could be used to correct deficiencies in the immunoglobulin secretion abilities of splenic B cells from ELL2 conditional knockout mice. We began with two cell lines, MM1.S containing only ELL2, and SKW6.4 containing only ELL3. In order to provide concrete support that these cells line expressed the desired proteins we ran a QPCR which showed that SKW6.4 does indeed contain ELL3 while MM1.S does not (Figure 1). Furthermore, a western blot was run using antibodies complimentary to ELL2. Once the blot was transferred to a membrane and imaged with chemiluminescence, it was clear that MM1.S contains ELL2, while SKW6.4 did not. (Figure 2) Moving forward, Lenti virus DNA will be packaged and placed into knockout mice cells (contains no ELL2) and wild type mice cells (contains ELL2). The cells without ELL2 should produce no immunoglobulin secretion as their immune system has been compromised. ELL1, ELL2 and ELL3 will then be individually added to the knockout cells. It is expected that ELL2 will correct this defect, however, the main purpose of this experiment is to see if ELL1 and/or ELL3 will also correct the defect. If so, it will prove that ELL1 and/or ELL3 have similar if not the same function within the immune system. Future directions will involve characterizations of the LECs and SECs for B versus ASCs. We would like to acknowledge Christine Milcarek for guiding us through this research and supporting our love for research. Also we would like to thank FER for this experience. Background Information When B cells differentiate into antibody secreting cells many genes are affected but little information is known. In a previous study, Dr. Milcarek found that there were changes in the expression of small nuclear RNA; an important component in splicing out introns from pre- RNA to form mature mRNA. Additionally, it was found that ELL3 levels are diminished after stimulation from B cells to ASC. As seen in the figure to the right, ELL3 is much lower in ASCs than B cells, while ELL2 is much lower in B cells than ASCs. This information led to looking into how snRNA is controlled during the transition from B cells to ASCs. It was hypothesized that ELL3 regulates the formation of SECs and LECs in B cells while ELL2 drives the formation of the SECs over the LECs when producing antibodies. It is this switch that benefits mRNA instead of snRNA. To test the hypothesis, we wanted to see if the down regulation of snRNA was linked to the down regulation of ELL3. Naïve splenic cells will be stimulated with LPS and then treated with inhibitors of protein synthesis or RNA synthesis and the production of ELL3 and snRNA will be monitored. Prior to doing so, the research mainly focused on identifying which cell lines contained ELL2 vs ELL3 so that we could be sure we had the correct genes. Additionally, we decided to grow a lenti virus that would be placed into ELL2 knockout splenic B cells. We would then inject the ELL proteins one at a time and see if one, or all could correct the deficiency, by monitoring the immunoglobulin secretion. The image to the left shows the similarities and differences between all three ELL proteins on a molecular level. As you can see most of ELL3’s DNA sequence is unknown and the parts that are shown are similar to the other ELL genes, suggesting a similarity between the genes functions. 10 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 10 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 To obtain a virus to transfect into the splenic B cells we ordered bacteria that contained a lenti virus, but needed to test if the sample actually contained the desired virus. The sample came with a plasmid map (as seen to the left) , that showed what enzymes would cut the plasmid, and at what locations. For our purposes we choose three enzymes, EcoR1, Sac1 and Sal1. These enzymes were predicted to produce segments of the plasmid at 6973 and 3401 for EcoR1, 2960, 191, 7223 for Sac1 and 1618, 2185, 6571 for Sal1. To test if our lenti virus would be cut in the appropriate locations, we mixed the enzymes with their complementary buffers and the DNA and ran each enzyme on a DNA gel , with three different samples of the lenti virus. In the gels below, lanes 6, 12, and 16 contain the lenti virus uncut, so serve as a control. Lanes 7, 13, and 17 contain the lenti virus cut with the EcoR1 enzyme and came out to be around 6000 kDa, as expected. Lanes 8, 14,and 18 contain the Sac1 enzyme and as seen in lanes 14 and 18, two bands appeared, one around 7000 kDa and another around 3000 kDa. Additionally, lane 8 contains the band at 7000 kDa and another very faint band around 200 kDa. All three of these bands were expected when cutting the plasmid with sac1. Lanes 9, 15 and 19 contain the lentu virus cut with Sal1 and all three lanes contain three bands around the 6000 kDa mark, the 2000 kDa and the 1000 kDa mark. All three values are consistent with the predicted values provided by the plasmid map. In order to confirm that the MM1.S cell line contained ELL2 while the SKW6.4 cell line did not, we ran a protein gel and western blot. Because the MM1.S cells were ASCs we expected a much large abundance in ELL2 than in the B cells (SKW6.4). In order to test the results the gel was transferred to a western blot and coated with a primary antibody that was complementary for ELL2 overnight. It was then washed and a anti- ELL2 secondary antibody was placed on the membrane. We were then able to expose the membrane to chemiluminescence and received the image to the left. The expected molecular weight of ELL2 is 72 kDa. As seen in the image there are thick bands within the ASC lanes that are near 72 kDa, as seen on the protein ladder next to the membrane image. Additionally, there are no bands around 72 kDa under the B cell lanes, proving that ELL2 is expressed in ASCs but not B cells. PCR is typically used to amplify a specific gene, or portion of gene, so that we can study the function of that gene or gene region. In our experiments, we amplify the lentiviral DNA that contains a vector with the gene eGFP (green fluorescent protein) as well as ELL3. Primers are used to flank the region you want to amplify. Each primer will amplify the gene sequence on both strands, creating a double-stranded gene product. The primers we used are represented at the figure below. The PCR process follows 3 steps. Denaturation step: First, you heat the DNA to a high temperature (95 °C) so that the two strands of genomic DNA, and later PCR DNA, separate. Annealing step: Second, you reduce the temperature (around 60 °C) so that DNA primers bind to either end of the template that you want to amplify. It is important that you have two primers, one to bind to each strand of DNA. Extension Step: Third, you raise the temperature to about 70 °C to activate a DNA polymerase and elongate the primer with respect to the template strand. Over the course of the semester in the Milcarek lab, we were ultimately able to lay the ground work for further testing of whether genes ELL1 and ELL3 have similar function in the immune response to that of the gene ELL2. We were able to ensure that the MM1.S cell line contained only ELL2 and the SKW6.4 cell line contained only ELL3 through quantitative PCR analysis as well as western blots using antibodies known to be complimentary to ELL2 (and therefore able to detect its presence). In addition, we were able to confirm that the lenti viral vector containing our genes of interest were present in the bacterial host, and therefore could be used to transfect into B cells of conditional knockout mice. References 1. Park, K. S., Bayles, I., Szlachta-McGinn, A., Paul, J., Boiko, J., Santos, P., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Borghesi, L., and Milcarek, C. (2014) J. Immunol. 193, 4663-4674 2. Miller, T., Williams, K., Johnstone, R. W., and Shilatifard, A. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 32052-32056 3. Luo, Z., Lin, C., and Shilatifard, A. (2012) Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 13, 543-547 4. Sage M. Smith, Nolan T. Carew, and Christine Milcarek Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States Recall that B cells differentiate into antibody secreting plasma cells (ASCs) upon stimulation by an antigen or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). ASCs make and secrete vast amounts of immunoglobulin molecules (Ig), and that this is influenced by differential IG heavy chain RNA polyadenylation and splicing. Also recall that ELL2 is the only gene of the three ELL genes that has previously been shown to act directly on immunoglobulin genes. It has so far been established that ELL2 is induced at least 10-fold in antibody secreting cells in comparison to B cells, while ELL1 expression decreases slightly and ELL3 expression decreases tremendously. In turn, such changes cause the RNA polymerase II in antibody secreting cells to take on different properties, ultimately resulting in changes concerning RNA processing and modification of histones (4). Continued research will focus on the role of ELL1 and ELL3 and whether they may substitute ELL2 in such functions. In the future, the lenti virus containing the gene of interest will be transfected into cells of conditional knockout mice. This will test whether ELL1 and/or ELL3 can have similar functionality as that exhibited by ELL2. In addition, further research may lead to characterization and analysis of the long elongation complexes (LECs) and the short elongation complexes (SECs) present in B cells as opposed to in ASCs.