SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TOPIC PAGE NUMBER
INTRODUCTION 2
METHODOLOGY 2
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 2
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 3
FINDINGS 7
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATION 11
2
INTRODUCTION
In this report we have quantitatively identified the differences in the emotional and rational level
entrenched in the four different television advertisements for the same product of the same
company. We have categorized consumers NFE(the personality variables) into high and low levels
and evaluated the interaction between emotional and rational content embedded in the four
television advertisements on consumer responses.
METHODOLOGY
In order to gather the necessary information needed for the research we have chosen structured
questions which include Likert scales (1-7) and have conducted surveys using Qualtrics and
Google Docs over the internet in order to collect data from 80 respondents.
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE
To quantitatively identify the differences in the emotional and rational levels embedded in the
advertisements we have applied instrument 1 which measures the perceived high or low levels of
rational content(RC) of an advertisement and instrument 2 which measures perceived high or low
levels of emotional content(EC) of an advertisement. In order to find the EC and RC we have
surveyed 6 respondents by creating a scales questionnaire of 8 questions putting 4 questions under
each instrument (1&2) for 10 advertisements. Then by using Qualtrics we have surveyed 80
respondents for consumer NFE (need for emotion) and by conducting ANOVA we found our
desired 4 advertisements with combinations of high/high, high/low, low/high, and low/low. After
this we have surveyed the same 80 respondents that we surveyed before but this time via Google
Docs and made them observe our 4 advertisements that we have selected. After this dividing the
3
80 respondents into low NFE (40) and High NFE (40) we made them look at the 4 advertisements
and then we surveyed them under instrument 3(4 questions) which measures consumers purchase
intention and instrument 4 (5 questions) which measures consumers' attitudes towards the
advertisements.
DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
First we need to derive the mean of NFC in the SPSS system and rank the 80 respondents according
to high (40) and low (40). For emotional content and rational content we chose 10 advertisements
and all 6 of us watched the advertisements. For each advertisement we derived the mean for each
advertisement and in the end we derived mean of all advertisements both for emotional and rational
content. After that we run the ANOVA. From the homogenous subset two tables are shown below:
ANOVA
MEAN_ALL_ADS_RATIONAL
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
BetweenGroups 67.246 9 7.472 6.808 .000
WithinGroups 54.875 50 1.098
Total 122.121 59
ANOVA
MEAN_ALL_ADS_EMOTIONAL
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 106.183 9 11.798 18.256 .000
Within Groups 32.313 50 .646
Total 138.496 59
4
MEAN_ALL_ADS_RATIONAL
Tukey HSD
AD_NO_RAT N Subsetforalpha= 0.05
1 2 3
2.00 6 2.67
1.00 6 3.17 3.17
4.00 6 3.50 3.50
5.00 6 3.58 3.58
3.00 6 4.54 4.54 4.54
10.00 6 4.88 4.88
6.00 6 4.96 4.96
8.00 6 5.13 5.13
7.00 6 5.75
9.00 6 5.92
Sig. .084 .060 .424
Means forgroups inhomogeneoussubsetsare displayed.
a. Uses HarmonicMean Sample Size =6.000.
MEAN_ALL_ADS_EMOTIONAL
Tukey HSD
AD_NO_EMO N Subsetforalpha= 0.05
1 2 3 4
7.00 6 2.2500
5.00 6 2.9583
6.00 6 3.0833
5
8.00 6 3.1250 3.1250
4.00 6 4.6250 4.6250
9.00 6 4.7500
3.00 6 5.0417 5.0417
10.00 6 5.2917 5.2917
2.00 6 5.8333 5.8333
1.00 6 6.4583
Sig. .678 .061 .243 .094
Means forgroups inhomogeneoussubsetsare displayed.
a. Uses HarmonicMean Sample Size =6.000.
From the tables above we can see 10 advertisements’ emotional and rational content being high
and low. The combinations are shown below:
AD RC EC
1 LOW (3.17) HIGH (6.45)
2 LOW (2.67) HIGH (5.83)
3 HIGH (4.54) HIGH (5.04)
4 LOW (3.5) HIGH (4.6)
5 LOW (3.58) LOW (2.95)
6 HIGH (4.96) LOW (3.08)
7 HIGH (5.75) LOW (2.25)
8 HIGH (5.13) LOW (3.12)
9 HIGH (5.92) HIGH (4.75)
10 HIGH (4.88) HIGH (5.29)
6
From this table we got four advertisement each of them having high EC/high RC (H, H) high
EC/low RC (H, L), low EC/high RC (L, H) and low EC/low RC (L, L).
AD No. RC EC
10 HIGH HIGH
7 HIGH LOW
1 LOW HIGH
5 LOW LOW
We showed these 4 advertisements to the 40 low NFC and 40 high NFC respondents we have
derived earlier from the consumer NFC survey.
LOW NFC
40
Respondent Number RC/EC of ADs
1-10 HH
11-20 HL
21-30 LH
31-40 HL
HIGH NFC
40
Respondent Number RC/EC of ADs
41-50 HH
51-60 HL
61-70 LH
71-80 HL
After conducting the data in the above shown manner we also got our data for the consumer attitude
(CA) and consumer purchase intention (CPI). With the data collected from RC/EC, CA/CPI and
NFC, we run the multivariate test (MANOVA) in order to analyze the interaction between the
three.
7
FINDINGS
In the findings we will first analyze the descriptive tests followed by multivariate test and tests of
between sub effects.
Descriptive Statistics
emotional_content rational_content nfe Mean Std. Deviation N
consumer_purchase_intentio
n
1.00
1.00
1.00 3.4500 1.74722 10
2.00 3.9000 1.27584 10
Total 3.6750 1.50678 20
2.00
1.00 4.4250 1.53229 10
2.00 4.8750 1.13192 10
Total 4.6500 1.33130 20
Total
1.00 3.9375 1.67582 20
2.00 4.3875 1.27598 20
Total 4.1625 1.48772 40
2.00
1.00
1.00 3.5250 1.69333 10
2.00 4.0750 1.09322 10
Total 3.8000 1.41561 20
2.00
1.00 3.5500 1.69476 10
2.00 3.8250 1.82973 10
Total 3.6875 1.72229 20
Total
1.00 3.5375 1.64891 20
2.00 3.9500 1.47256 20
Total 3.7438 1.55713 40
Total
1.00
1.00 3.4875 1.67504 20
2.00 3.9875 1.15984 20
Total 3.7375 1.44443 40
2.00
1.00 3.9875 1.63529 20
2.00 4.3500 1.57572 20
Total 4.1688 1.59565 40
Total
1.00 3.7375 1.65342 40
2.00 4.1687 1.37793 40
8
Total 3.9531 1.52775 80
Consumer_Attitude
1.00
1.00
1.00 3.7600 1.81549 10
2.00 3.9800 1.48009 10
Total 3.8700 1.61607 20
2.00
1.00 4.4800 1.16695 10
2.00 5.0000 1.22202 10
Total 4.7400 1.19314 20
Total
1.00 4.1200 1.53060 20
2.00 4.4900 1.42086 20
Total 4.3050 1.46969 40
2.00
1.00
1.00 3.8800 1.96684 10
2.00 4.6000 1.52315 10
Total 4.2400 1.75151 20
2.00
1.00 4.0000 1.39841 10
2.00 4.1600 1.41986 10
Total 4.0800 1.37405 20
Total
1.00 3.9400 1.66208 20
2.00 4.3800 1.45081 20
Total 4.1600 1.55593 40
Total
1.00
1.00 3.8200 1.84322 20
2.00 4.2900 1.49592 20
Total 4.0550 1.67393 40
2.00
1.00 4.2400 1.27750 20
2.00 4.5800 1.35941 20
Total 4.4100 1.31340 40
Total
1.00 4.0300 1.57971 40
2.00 4.4350 1.41848 40
Total 4.2325 1.50558 80
Now we will conduct the multivariate test.It is shown below:
9
Multivariate Testsa
Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta
Squared
Intercept
Pillai's Trace .900 317.893b
2.000 71.000 .000 .900
Wilks'Lambda .100 317.893b
2.000 71.000 .000 .900
Hotelling's Trace 8.955 317.893b
2.000 71.000 .000 .900
Roy's LargestRoot 8.955 317.893b
2.000 71.000 .000 .900
emotional_content
Pillai's Trace .033 1.230b
2.000 71.000 .298 .033
Wilks'Lambda .967 1.230b
2.000 71.000 .298 .033
Hotelling's Trace .035 1.230b
2.000 71.000 .298 .033
Roy's LargestRoot .035 1.230b
2.000 71.000 .298 .033
rational_content
Pillai's Trace .022 .789b
2.000 71.000 .458 .022
Wilks'Lambda .978 .789b
2.000 71.000 .458 .022
Hotelling's Trace .022 .789b 2.000 71.000 .458 .022
Roy's LargestRoot .022 .789b
2.000 71.000 .458 .022
nfe
Pillai's Trace .023 .827b 2.000 71.000 .442 .023
Wilks'Lambda .977 .827b
2.000 71.000 .442 .023
Hotelling's Trace .023 .827b
2.000 71.000 .442 .023
Roy's LargestRoot .023 .827b
2.000 71.000 .442 .023
emotional_content*
rational_content
Pillai's Trace .036 1.322b
2.000 71.000 .273 .036
Wilks'Lambda .964 1.322b
2.000 71.000 .273 .036
Hotelling's Trace .037 1.322b
2.000 71.000 .273 .036
Roy's LargestRoot .037 1.322b 2.000 71.000 .273 .036
emotional_content* nfe
Pillai's Trace .001 .034b 2.000 71.000 .967 .001
Wilks'Lambda .999 .034b
2.000 71.000 .967 .001
Hotelling's Trace .001 .034b
2.000 71.000 .967 .001
Roy's LargestRoot .001 .034b
2.000 71.000 .967 .001
rational_content* nfe
Pillai's Trace .001 .021b
2.000 71.000 .979 .001
Wilks'Lambda .999 .021b
2.000 71.000 .979 .001
Hotelling's Trace .001 .021b 2.000 71.000 .979 .001
Roy's LargestRoot .001 .021b
2.000 71.000 .979 .001
emotional_content*
rational_content* nfe
Pillai's Trace .010 .342b
2.000 71.000 .712 .010
Wilks'Lambda .990 .342b
2.000 71.000 .712 .010
Hotelling's Trace .010 .342b
2.000 71.000 .712 .010
Roy's LargestRoot .010 .342b
2.000 71.000 .712 .010
a. Design:Intercept+ emotional_content+ rational_content+ nfe + emotional_content* rational_content+ emotional_content * nfe +
rational_content* nfe + emotional_content* rational_content* nfe
b. Exact statistic
10
Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Source DependentVariable Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Square
Corrected Model
consumer_purchase
_intention
17.055a
7 2.436 1.048 .406 .092
Consumer_Attitude 12.560b
7 1.794 .776 .610 .070
Intercept
consumer_purchase
_intention
1250.176 1 1250.176 537.931 .000 .882
Consumer_Attitude 1433.125 1 1433.125 619.670 .000 .896
emotional_content
consumer_purchase
_intention
3.507 1 3.507 1.509 .223 .021
Consumer_Attitude .421 1 .421 .182 .671 .003
rational_content
consumer_purchase
_intention
3.720 1 3.720 1.600 .210 .022
Consumer_Attitude 2.521 1 2.521 1.090 .300 .015
nfe
consumer_purchase
_intention
3.720 1 3.720 1.600 .210 .022
Consumer_Attitude 3.281 1 3.281 1.418 .238 .019
emotional_content*
rational_content
consumer_purchase
_intention
5.913 1 5.913 2.544 .115 .034
Consumer_Attitude 5.304 1 5.304 2.294 .134 .031
emotional_content* nfe
consumer_purchase
_intention
.007 1 .007 .003 .956 .000
Consumer_Attitude .025 1 .025 .011 .918 .000
rational_content* nfe
consumer_purchase
_intention
.095 1 .095 .041 .841 .001
Consumer_Attitude .084 1 .084 .037 .849 .001
emotional_content*
rational_content* nfe
consumer_purchase
_intention
.095 1 .095 .041 .841 .001
Consumer_Attitude .924 1 .924 .400 .529 .006
Error
consumer_purchase
_intention
167.331 72 2.324
Consumer_Attitude 166.516 72 2.313
Total
consumer_purchase
_intention
1434.563 80
Consumer_Attitude 1612.200 80
Corrected Total
consumer_purchase
_intention
184.387 79
Consumer_Attitude 179.076 79
a. R Squared = .092 (Adjusted R Squared = .004)
b. R Squared = .070 (Adjusted R Squared = -.020)
11
In the testabove we analyze the effect of the combination of purchase intention and consumer
attitude on EC, RC and NFC. As from the MANOVA, we have observed that none of the
dependent and independent variables significance level is below 0.05, it indicates that the
independent variable which is the advertisement has no impact on the dependent variable
which is the consumer purchase intention and consumer attitude. None of the variables is
working independently and co-relatedly. Hence, in this case the selectedfour advertisement
is not impacting the consumer perception. Therefore, taking this scenario into consideration
we came up with these following managerial implications.
MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS
Grameenphone (GP) is currently using the intermedia for the exposure of their products and
services to their customers which ultimately get the tonic responses. The tonic response suggest
the long term response. And hence they might be successful in fostering responses that has a long
term impact on the consumers’ mind and fails to raise the phasic response which was the main
purpose of showing the advertise to the consumers. The underline reason behind this was the soul
concentration on the rational and emotional contents of the GP advertisements.
At present days, GP is on the maturity stage of the development which means that they have major
market share in the industry. In addition to that, they are very well-known/established brand. As a
result of which, consumer don’t really seek new information or pay any attention to the current
TV commercials. Hence whether the ad is emotionally or rationally embedded they do not actually
give any sort of immediate response. So, no impact on the consumer purchase intention and
attitude.
12
GP advertisements have such contents which might influence someone emotionally or rationally
but it is not specially tied with the concept of telecommunication brand. People always tend to
overlook the fact that at the end of the day what was the product or services that was offered in the
advertisement. They only remember the emotional and fancy characters of the advertisement.
As a whole, being marketing researchers we would suggest GP to use intramedia to foster phasic
response by improving their structural features such as editing, cutting, zooming etc. Also, they
should telecast pop-up advertisement in between pick up hours. This will reduce their costs which
occurs when they telecast a 40 second advertisement on TV and also this will increase the sales
for GP.
At present from our research we found that the advertisements are not working for GP. So they
should focus on changing their current strategies and come up with something that brings about
the change GP is actually looking for.

More Related Content

Similar to FINAL-470-REPORT

Lab Based E-portfolio
Lab Based E-portfolioLab Based E-portfolio
Lab Based E-portfolio
Nor Khamsiah
 
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work! Na.docx
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work!     Na.docxExam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work!     Na.docx
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work! Na.docx
SANSKAR20
 
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
Alexander Decker
 
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
Alexander Decker
 
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docxWeek 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
co4spmeley
 
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
Peter Anyebe
 
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docxwealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
melbruce90096
 
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for SemiconductorStatistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
Xuanhua(Peter) Yin
 
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docxBUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
humphrieskalyn
 

Similar to FINAL-470-REPORT (20)

Lab Based E-portfolio
Lab Based E-portfolioLab Based E-portfolio
Lab Based E-portfolio
 
Descriptive Statistics, Numerical Description
Descriptive Statistics, Numerical DescriptionDescriptive Statistics, Numerical Description
Descriptive Statistics, Numerical Description
 
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work! Na.docx
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work!     Na.docxExam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work!     Na.docx
Exam 1 (covers Chapters 1-7)Math 140Show all work! Na.docx
 
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
 
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
A study of psychographic variables proposed for segmentation for personal car...
 
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docxWeek 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
Week 4 Project - STAT 3001Student Name Date.docx
 
BioOrganicsCS
BioOrganicsCSBioOrganicsCS
BioOrganicsCS
 
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
The Factor-F: A Measure of the Human-Power Resource Quality to Diagnose Segme...
 
Task 3_final Economy & Finance Study material
Task 3_final Economy & Finance Study materialTask 3_final Economy & Finance Study material
Task 3_final Economy & Finance Study material
 
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docxwealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
wealth age region37 50 M24 88 U14 64 A13 63 U13 66 .docx
 
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for SemiconductorStatistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
Statistical Model to Predict IPO Prices for Semiconductor
 
A comparatative study on maggi&top ramen
A comparatative study on maggi&top ramenA comparatative study on maggi&top ramen
A comparatative study on maggi&top ramen
 
Analysis on the US Consumer Expenditure
Analysis on the US Consumer ExpenditureAnalysis on the US Consumer Expenditure
Analysis on the US Consumer Expenditure
 
Measures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
Measures of Central Tendency Final.pptMeasures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
Measures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
 
Measures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
Measures of Central Tendency Final.pptMeasures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
Measures of Central Tendency Final.ppt
 
Marketing research ch 9_malhotra
Marketing research ch 9_malhotraMarketing research ch 9_malhotra
Marketing research ch 9_malhotra
 
chap 9.pdf
chap 9.pdfchap 9.pdf
chap 9.pdf
 
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docxBUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
BUSI 331Marketing Research Report Part 3 InstructionsData .docx
 
Decision theory
Decision theoryDecision theory
Decision theory
 
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity AnalysisSensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity Analysis
 

FINAL-470-REPORT

  • 1. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TOPIC PAGE NUMBER INTRODUCTION 2 METHODOLOGY 2 DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE 2 DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURE 3 FINDINGS 7 MANAGERIAL IMPLICATION 11
  • 2. 2 INTRODUCTION In this report we have quantitatively identified the differences in the emotional and rational level entrenched in the four different television advertisements for the same product of the same company. We have categorized consumers NFE(the personality variables) into high and low levels and evaluated the interaction between emotional and rational content embedded in the four television advertisements on consumer responses. METHODOLOGY In order to gather the necessary information needed for the research we have chosen structured questions which include Likert scales (1-7) and have conducted surveys using Qualtrics and Google Docs over the internet in order to collect data from 80 respondents. DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE To quantitatively identify the differences in the emotional and rational levels embedded in the advertisements we have applied instrument 1 which measures the perceived high or low levels of rational content(RC) of an advertisement and instrument 2 which measures perceived high or low levels of emotional content(EC) of an advertisement. In order to find the EC and RC we have surveyed 6 respondents by creating a scales questionnaire of 8 questions putting 4 questions under each instrument (1&2) for 10 advertisements. Then by using Qualtrics we have surveyed 80 respondents for consumer NFE (need for emotion) and by conducting ANOVA we found our desired 4 advertisements with combinations of high/high, high/low, low/high, and low/low. After this we have surveyed the same 80 respondents that we surveyed before but this time via Google Docs and made them observe our 4 advertisements that we have selected. After this dividing the
  • 3. 3 80 respondents into low NFE (40) and High NFE (40) we made them look at the 4 advertisements and then we surveyed them under instrument 3(4 questions) which measures consumers purchase intention and instrument 4 (5 questions) which measures consumers' attitudes towards the advertisements. DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURE First we need to derive the mean of NFC in the SPSS system and rank the 80 respondents according to high (40) and low (40). For emotional content and rational content we chose 10 advertisements and all 6 of us watched the advertisements. For each advertisement we derived the mean for each advertisement and in the end we derived mean of all advertisements both for emotional and rational content. After that we run the ANOVA. From the homogenous subset two tables are shown below: ANOVA MEAN_ALL_ADS_RATIONAL Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. BetweenGroups 67.246 9 7.472 6.808 .000 WithinGroups 54.875 50 1.098 Total 122.121 59 ANOVA MEAN_ALL_ADS_EMOTIONAL Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 106.183 9 11.798 18.256 .000 Within Groups 32.313 50 .646 Total 138.496 59
  • 4. 4 MEAN_ALL_ADS_RATIONAL Tukey HSD AD_NO_RAT N Subsetforalpha= 0.05 1 2 3 2.00 6 2.67 1.00 6 3.17 3.17 4.00 6 3.50 3.50 5.00 6 3.58 3.58 3.00 6 4.54 4.54 4.54 10.00 6 4.88 4.88 6.00 6 4.96 4.96 8.00 6 5.13 5.13 7.00 6 5.75 9.00 6 5.92 Sig. .084 .060 .424 Means forgroups inhomogeneoussubsetsare displayed. a. Uses HarmonicMean Sample Size =6.000. MEAN_ALL_ADS_EMOTIONAL Tukey HSD AD_NO_EMO N Subsetforalpha= 0.05 1 2 3 4 7.00 6 2.2500 5.00 6 2.9583 6.00 6 3.0833
  • 5. 5 8.00 6 3.1250 3.1250 4.00 6 4.6250 4.6250 9.00 6 4.7500 3.00 6 5.0417 5.0417 10.00 6 5.2917 5.2917 2.00 6 5.8333 5.8333 1.00 6 6.4583 Sig. .678 .061 .243 .094 Means forgroups inhomogeneoussubsetsare displayed. a. Uses HarmonicMean Sample Size =6.000. From the tables above we can see 10 advertisements’ emotional and rational content being high and low. The combinations are shown below: AD RC EC 1 LOW (3.17) HIGH (6.45) 2 LOW (2.67) HIGH (5.83) 3 HIGH (4.54) HIGH (5.04) 4 LOW (3.5) HIGH (4.6) 5 LOW (3.58) LOW (2.95) 6 HIGH (4.96) LOW (3.08) 7 HIGH (5.75) LOW (2.25) 8 HIGH (5.13) LOW (3.12) 9 HIGH (5.92) HIGH (4.75) 10 HIGH (4.88) HIGH (5.29)
  • 6. 6 From this table we got four advertisement each of them having high EC/high RC (H, H) high EC/low RC (H, L), low EC/high RC (L, H) and low EC/low RC (L, L). AD No. RC EC 10 HIGH HIGH 7 HIGH LOW 1 LOW HIGH 5 LOW LOW We showed these 4 advertisements to the 40 low NFC and 40 high NFC respondents we have derived earlier from the consumer NFC survey. LOW NFC 40 Respondent Number RC/EC of ADs 1-10 HH 11-20 HL 21-30 LH 31-40 HL HIGH NFC 40 Respondent Number RC/EC of ADs 41-50 HH 51-60 HL 61-70 LH 71-80 HL After conducting the data in the above shown manner we also got our data for the consumer attitude (CA) and consumer purchase intention (CPI). With the data collected from RC/EC, CA/CPI and NFC, we run the multivariate test (MANOVA) in order to analyze the interaction between the three.
  • 7. 7 FINDINGS In the findings we will first analyze the descriptive tests followed by multivariate test and tests of between sub effects. Descriptive Statistics emotional_content rational_content nfe Mean Std. Deviation N consumer_purchase_intentio n 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.4500 1.74722 10 2.00 3.9000 1.27584 10 Total 3.6750 1.50678 20 2.00 1.00 4.4250 1.53229 10 2.00 4.8750 1.13192 10 Total 4.6500 1.33130 20 Total 1.00 3.9375 1.67582 20 2.00 4.3875 1.27598 20 Total 4.1625 1.48772 40 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.5250 1.69333 10 2.00 4.0750 1.09322 10 Total 3.8000 1.41561 20 2.00 1.00 3.5500 1.69476 10 2.00 3.8250 1.82973 10 Total 3.6875 1.72229 20 Total 1.00 3.5375 1.64891 20 2.00 3.9500 1.47256 20 Total 3.7438 1.55713 40 Total 1.00 1.00 3.4875 1.67504 20 2.00 3.9875 1.15984 20 Total 3.7375 1.44443 40 2.00 1.00 3.9875 1.63529 20 2.00 4.3500 1.57572 20 Total 4.1688 1.59565 40 Total 1.00 3.7375 1.65342 40 2.00 4.1687 1.37793 40
  • 8. 8 Total 3.9531 1.52775 80 Consumer_Attitude 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.7600 1.81549 10 2.00 3.9800 1.48009 10 Total 3.8700 1.61607 20 2.00 1.00 4.4800 1.16695 10 2.00 5.0000 1.22202 10 Total 4.7400 1.19314 20 Total 1.00 4.1200 1.53060 20 2.00 4.4900 1.42086 20 Total 4.3050 1.46969 40 2.00 1.00 1.00 3.8800 1.96684 10 2.00 4.6000 1.52315 10 Total 4.2400 1.75151 20 2.00 1.00 4.0000 1.39841 10 2.00 4.1600 1.41986 10 Total 4.0800 1.37405 20 Total 1.00 3.9400 1.66208 20 2.00 4.3800 1.45081 20 Total 4.1600 1.55593 40 Total 1.00 1.00 3.8200 1.84322 20 2.00 4.2900 1.49592 20 Total 4.0550 1.67393 40 2.00 1.00 4.2400 1.27750 20 2.00 4.5800 1.35941 20 Total 4.4100 1.31340 40 Total 1.00 4.0300 1.57971 40 2.00 4.4350 1.41848 40 Total 4.2325 1.50558 80 Now we will conduct the multivariate test.It is shown below:
  • 9. 9 Multivariate Testsa Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig. Partial Eta Squared Intercept Pillai's Trace .900 317.893b 2.000 71.000 .000 .900 Wilks'Lambda .100 317.893b 2.000 71.000 .000 .900 Hotelling's Trace 8.955 317.893b 2.000 71.000 .000 .900 Roy's LargestRoot 8.955 317.893b 2.000 71.000 .000 .900 emotional_content Pillai's Trace .033 1.230b 2.000 71.000 .298 .033 Wilks'Lambda .967 1.230b 2.000 71.000 .298 .033 Hotelling's Trace .035 1.230b 2.000 71.000 .298 .033 Roy's LargestRoot .035 1.230b 2.000 71.000 .298 .033 rational_content Pillai's Trace .022 .789b 2.000 71.000 .458 .022 Wilks'Lambda .978 .789b 2.000 71.000 .458 .022 Hotelling's Trace .022 .789b 2.000 71.000 .458 .022 Roy's LargestRoot .022 .789b 2.000 71.000 .458 .022 nfe Pillai's Trace .023 .827b 2.000 71.000 .442 .023 Wilks'Lambda .977 .827b 2.000 71.000 .442 .023 Hotelling's Trace .023 .827b 2.000 71.000 .442 .023 Roy's LargestRoot .023 .827b 2.000 71.000 .442 .023 emotional_content* rational_content Pillai's Trace .036 1.322b 2.000 71.000 .273 .036 Wilks'Lambda .964 1.322b 2.000 71.000 .273 .036 Hotelling's Trace .037 1.322b 2.000 71.000 .273 .036 Roy's LargestRoot .037 1.322b 2.000 71.000 .273 .036 emotional_content* nfe Pillai's Trace .001 .034b 2.000 71.000 .967 .001 Wilks'Lambda .999 .034b 2.000 71.000 .967 .001 Hotelling's Trace .001 .034b 2.000 71.000 .967 .001 Roy's LargestRoot .001 .034b 2.000 71.000 .967 .001 rational_content* nfe Pillai's Trace .001 .021b 2.000 71.000 .979 .001 Wilks'Lambda .999 .021b 2.000 71.000 .979 .001 Hotelling's Trace .001 .021b 2.000 71.000 .979 .001 Roy's LargestRoot .001 .021b 2.000 71.000 .979 .001 emotional_content* rational_content* nfe Pillai's Trace .010 .342b 2.000 71.000 .712 .010 Wilks'Lambda .990 .342b 2.000 71.000 .712 .010 Hotelling's Trace .010 .342b 2.000 71.000 .712 .010 Roy's LargestRoot .010 .342b 2.000 71.000 .712 .010 a. Design:Intercept+ emotional_content+ rational_content+ nfe + emotional_content* rational_content+ emotional_content * nfe + rational_content* nfe + emotional_content* rational_content* nfe b. Exact statistic
  • 10. 10 Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Source DependentVariable Type III Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Partial Eta Square Corrected Model consumer_purchase _intention 17.055a 7 2.436 1.048 .406 .092 Consumer_Attitude 12.560b 7 1.794 .776 .610 .070 Intercept consumer_purchase _intention 1250.176 1 1250.176 537.931 .000 .882 Consumer_Attitude 1433.125 1 1433.125 619.670 .000 .896 emotional_content consumer_purchase _intention 3.507 1 3.507 1.509 .223 .021 Consumer_Attitude .421 1 .421 .182 .671 .003 rational_content consumer_purchase _intention 3.720 1 3.720 1.600 .210 .022 Consumer_Attitude 2.521 1 2.521 1.090 .300 .015 nfe consumer_purchase _intention 3.720 1 3.720 1.600 .210 .022 Consumer_Attitude 3.281 1 3.281 1.418 .238 .019 emotional_content* rational_content consumer_purchase _intention 5.913 1 5.913 2.544 .115 .034 Consumer_Attitude 5.304 1 5.304 2.294 .134 .031 emotional_content* nfe consumer_purchase _intention .007 1 .007 .003 .956 .000 Consumer_Attitude .025 1 .025 .011 .918 .000 rational_content* nfe consumer_purchase _intention .095 1 .095 .041 .841 .001 Consumer_Attitude .084 1 .084 .037 .849 .001 emotional_content* rational_content* nfe consumer_purchase _intention .095 1 .095 .041 .841 .001 Consumer_Attitude .924 1 .924 .400 .529 .006 Error consumer_purchase _intention 167.331 72 2.324 Consumer_Attitude 166.516 72 2.313 Total consumer_purchase _intention 1434.563 80 Consumer_Attitude 1612.200 80 Corrected Total consumer_purchase _intention 184.387 79 Consumer_Attitude 179.076 79 a. R Squared = .092 (Adjusted R Squared = .004) b. R Squared = .070 (Adjusted R Squared = -.020)
  • 11. 11 In the testabove we analyze the effect of the combination of purchase intention and consumer attitude on EC, RC and NFC. As from the MANOVA, we have observed that none of the dependent and independent variables significance level is below 0.05, it indicates that the independent variable which is the advertisement has no impact on the dependent variable which is the consumer purchase intention and consumer attitude. None of the variables is working independently and co-relatedly. Hence, in this case the selectedfour advertisement is not impacting the consumer perception. Therefore, taking this scenario into consideration we came up with these following managerial implications. MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS Grameenphone (GP) is currently using the intermedia for the exposure of their products and services to their customers which ultimately get the tonic responses. The tonic response suggest the long term response. And hence they might be successful in fostering responses that has a long term impact on the consumers’ mind and fails to raise the phasic response which was the main purpose of showing the advertise to the consumers. The underline reason behind this was the soul concentration on the rational and emotional contents of the GP advertisements. At present days, GP is on the maturity stage of the development which means that they have major market share in the industry. In addition to that, they are very well-known/established brand. As a result of which, consumer don’t really seek new information or pay any attention to the current TV commercials. Hence whether the ad is emotionally or rationally embedded they do not actually give any sort of immediate response. So, no impact on the consumer purchase intention and attitude.
  • 12. 12 GP advertisements have such contents which might influence someone emotionally or rationally but it is not specially tied with the concept of telecommunication brand. People always tend to overlook the fact that at the end of the day what was the product or services that was offered in the advertisement. They only remember the emotional and fancy characters of the advertisement. As a whole, being marketing researchers we would suggest GP to use intramedia to foster phasic response by improving their structural features such as editing, cutting, zooming etc. Also, they should telecast pop-up advertisement in between pick up hours. This will reduce their costs which occurs when they telecast a 40 second advertisement on TV and also this will increase the sales for GP. At present from our research we found that the advertisements are not working for GP. So they should focus on changing their current strategies and come up with something that brings about the change GP is actually looking for.