SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Download to read offline
Vegetation ecology of the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature
Reserve, Mpumalanga
S.E. Nkosi ⁎, A.S. Barrett, L.R. Brown
Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Private bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa
a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 November 2015
Received in revised form 3 February 2016
Accepted 9 February 2016
Available online xxxx
Edited by Richard Cowling
Vegetation descriptions and maps derived from vegetation classification exercises are important management
tools for conservation managers in protected areas. This study classifies, describes, and maps the vegetation of
a recently acquired area, the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve. Nooitgedacht is unique in
that it resembles Bankenveld vegetation and differs from previously described areas in the reserve. The Braun–
Blanquet approach was used for classifying the different plant communities. A total of 170 sample plots
(100 m2
) were placed in all homogeneous vegetation units in a randomly stratified manner. Plant species and
various habitat variables were recorded for each plot. Plant community data were analysed using the JUICE soft-
ware package. A modified TWINSPAN classification was done to classify the different plant communities in the
study area. 11 plant communities, grouped into seven major groups, were identified. These plant communities
are distributed across open and closed woodlands, grasslands, and wetland areas. Four new plant communities
were identified for the reserve. Results indicate that plant communities 5 and 6 have the highest species diversity
and should be managed to prevent loss of diversity. A vegetation map of the identified plant communities was
produced using ArcGIS.
© 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Bankenveld
Phytosociology
Braun–Blanquet
Plant communities
JUICE
TWINSPAN
Tree density
Species diversity
Shannon–Wiener
1. Introduction
Vegetation classification and mapping are widely used tools for the
interpretation and description of natural ecosystems and habitats
(Brown et al., 2013). These tools are used to facilitate decision making
for the management of protected areas (Bredenkamp and Theron,
1978). According to Rouget et al. (2004), information derived from the
classification of vegetation provides a good representation of the biodi-
versity found in an area since most animals, birds, insects, and other
organisms are associated with particular plant communities.
Loskop Dam Nature Reserve (LDNR) is one of the largest and oldest
reserves in the Mpumalanga province and is currently managed by the
Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency (MTPA) (Ferrar and Lötter,
2007). The reserve was established in 1942, proclaimed as a nature re-
serve in 1954 (Eksteen, 2003), and subsequently expanded through
the occasional incorporation of additional farms. The current size of
LDNR is 23,175 ha (Ferrar and Lötter, 2007). LDNR lies on the transition
zone between the Grassland and the Savanna biomes (Eksteen, 2003).
Vegetation on higher lying areas is typical of the grassland biome,
while the lower lying areas represent the Savanna biome (Eksteen,
2003; Mucina and Rutherford, 2006). According to Acocks (1988),
veld types represented on the reserve include Mixed Bushveld (Veld
type 18), Sourish Mixed Bushveld (Veld type 19), and Bankenveld
(Veld type 61). Mucina and Rutherford (2006) provide a more refined
description of the LDNR vegetation and suggest that the two main
veld types occurring on the reserve are Central Sandy Bushveld
(SVcb12) and Loskop Mountain Bushveld (SVcb13).
Theron (1973) undertook the first detailed vegetation classification
and description for the original reserve. The Parys and Rietfontein sec-
tions of the reserve were later added to the northeastern boundary of
the reserve and were classified and mapped by Götze et al. (1998).
The Hondekraal section (3347 ha) was incorporated into the reserve
during the 1990s and a vegetation classification and description was
undertaken by Filmalter (2010). This study classifies, describes, and
maps the plant communities of the Nooitgedacht section.
The aims of this paper were
i. to identify and describe the floristic composition of the various plant
communities found in the study area
ii. to classify the different plant communities according to the domi-
nant plant species occurring in them
iii. to map the plant communities
South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
⁎ Corresponding author.
E-mail address: nkosise@unisa.ac.za (S.E. Nkosi).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.199
0254-6299/© 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
South African Journal of Botany
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb
2. Study area
Loskop Dam Nature Reserve is situated in Mpumalanga province,
approximately 55 km North of Middelburg in the Olifants River valley
at latitude 25°22′ to 25°31′ South, and 29°10′ to 29°24′ East (Fig. 1).
The Nooitgedacht section covers approximately 4457 ha and is located
on the northwestern boundary of the reserve (Fig. 1).
LDNR occurs in the summer rainfall region of South Africa and has
warm to very hot summers with moderate winters. Rainfall occurs
mainly as showers and high intensity thunderstorms, often accompa-
nied by severe lightning and strong, gusty, southwesterly winds. The
majority of rainfall occurs during the hot summer months (November
to April). The mean long-term rainfall (2004 to 2014) for LDNR is
650 mm per annum. Rainfall and temperature data for the study period
(2010 to 2012) were collected at a weather station located at the
reserve's main office (Fig. 2).
The Nooitgedacht section occurs on the higher lying areas of the
reserve and resembles typical grassland vegetation. Soils are predomi-
nantly shallow interspersed with prominent rocky outcrops, while
deeper soils occur in lower lying areas. Land types describe the different
soil and climate patterns for an area (Fitzpatrick et al., 1986). Mucina
and Rutherford (2006) defined a land type as a map unit that can be
mapped at 1:250,000 scale. Land types identified in the study area in-
clude Fa7, Ib17, Ib10, and Ib13. Fa7 and Ib10 land types occur on shallow
soils with underlying hard rock or fractured and weathering rock
material; lime is rare or absent (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Ib10
Fig. 1. Location of the study area in Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga.
Fig. 2. Rainfall and temperature data for the study period.
80 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
and Ib13 land types have in excess of 60% rock cover and occur on
shallow soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
3. Materials and methods
The Braun–Blanquet approach to vegetation classification and
description was used for this study. Homogenous vegetation units
were delineated using a series of 1:50,000 stereo aerial photographs. A
total of 170 sample plots were identified and placed in a randomly
stratified manner in delineated vegetation units (Bezuidenhout, 1993;
Brown and Bredenkamp, 1994). Additional sample plots were placed
in larger vegetation units to ensure sufficient sampling (Brown et al.,
2013). GPS coordinates of all sample plots were recorded. Predetermined
sample plot sizes (100 m2
) were used based on surveys done in Savanna
vegetation (Weger, 1974; Coetzee, 1975; Bezuidenhout, 1993). Data
were collected over two growing seasons from November 2010 to
April 2012.
3.1. Data collection
Using a modified Braun–Blanquet cover abundance scale, species
presence and percentage cover of the different vegetation layers
(trees, shrubs, and herbaceous) were recorded (Mueller-Dombois and
Ellenberg, 1974). The number of woody plants in three different height
classes (Lower 0–1 m, Medium N1–3 m and Upper N3 m) was also re-
corded (Brown and Bredenkamp, 1994). Environmental and related
variables collected included plot location (GPS coordinates); plot num-
ber; accessibility of the area to wildlife (signs of grazing, browsing,
trampling, droppings, paths); signs of fire (current and previous);
slope (flat 0°–3°, gentle 3.1°–9°, moderate 9.1°–15°, steep 15.1°–25°,
and very steep 25.1°–55°) (Westfall, 1981); altitude (metres above sea
level); and aspect (north, northeast, east, southeast, south, southwest,
west, and northwest).
Total tree density (TTD) within each sample plot was determined by
counting the number of trees per species present. Trees and shrubs
were distinguished from one another using the guidelines set by
Edwards (1983).
3.2. Data analysis
Floristic and habitat data were captured using TURBOVEG
(Hennekens, 1996). All relevé data were exported as a Cornell Con-
densed species file into JUICE 7.0 (Tichy, 2002) for editing, classifying,
and analysing floristic data into a preliminary phytosociological table.
A modified TWINSPAN (Hill, 1979; Rolecěk et al., 2009) classification
was performed using Whittaker's beta-diversity to derive a first approx-
imation of the plant communities for the study area. Pseudo-species cut
levels were set at 0–1-5-25-55-75, and the phytosociological table was
manually refined according to Braun–Blanquet procedures (Brown
et al., 2013). A vegetation map of the classified plant communities
was produced using ArcGIS 10 (ESRI, 2014).
Tree density (ind/ha) was calculated for each plant community per
height class using the following formula:
Tree density ¼
Total number of trees per plant community  10; 000 m2
À Á
Total size of sample plots for plant community
Data collected using the Braun–Blanquet cover abundance scale
(Table 1) were transformed from an alpha-numeric scale to a numerical
scale (‘r’ = 1,’1’ = 2, ‘+’ = 3, ‘2a’ = 5, ‘2b’ = 6, ‘3’ = 7, ‘4’ = 8, ‘5’ = 9)
to calculate species diversity (H) and evenness (E) for the different plant
communities (Van der Maarel, 1979). Shannon–Wiener diversity
indices were determined and compared using H and E (Shannon and
Wiener, 1963).
4. Results
4.1. Vegetation classification
A modified TWINSPAN classification resulted in the identification of
eleven plant communities grouped into seven major communities and
presented in Table 1 (Fig. 3):
1. Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia wetland
2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland
Fig. 3. Vegetation map of the Nooitgedacht section.
81S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
Table 2
Woody species density per height class for the different plant communities (L = Lower, M = Medium, U = Upper).
Plant community
number
1 2.1 2.2 3 4.1 4.2 5 6 7.1 7.2 7.3
Height Classes U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L
Diospyros lycioides 0 80 40 0 0 7 0 10 10 0 6 0
Grewia occidentalis 0 40 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0
Vachellia karroo 0 20 20 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Buddleja salviifolia 0 180 120 0 20 0 0 20 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
Celtis africana 0 20 20 125 0 0 13 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0
Searsia pyroides 0 20 0 0 0 25 33 0 7 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 28 0 11 0 0 0 9
Robinia pseudo-acacia 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rhoicissus tridentata 0 420 200 0 0 75 0 20 53 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 11 28 0 0 0 0 0 9
Ziziphus mucronata 620
ind/ha
0 0 100 7 20 40 20 0 7 0 0 0 17 17 33 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Senegalia caffra 75 100 0 87 33 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 50 33 33 28 6 28 11 16 37 0 0 0 0 0 0
Searsia leptodictya 25 25 25 33 47 7 27 0 13 0 40 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Illex mitis 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gymnosporia buxifolia 0 0 25 0 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maytenus alba 50 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Rhamnus pyroides 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grewia monticola 25 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cussonia paniculosa 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Olea europaea subsp.
Africanaolea europaea
subsp. africanaOlea
europaea subsp.
africanaOlea europaea
subsp. africanaOlea
europaea subsp.
africana
50 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Mimusops zeyheri 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Berchemia zeyheri 0 0 25 0 20 33 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diospyros whyteana 0 50 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Searsia magalismontana 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ozoroa paniculosa 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dombeya rotundifolia 0 0 25 27 33 0 7 0 0 0 20 20 17 17 17 0 22 28 0 11 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Senegalia burkei 75 0 0 13 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 58 75 6 0 0 5 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Euclea divinorum 50 0 0 0 7 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vepris lanceolata 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heteropyxis natalensis 600 350 500 13 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 17 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 8
Euclea natalensis 1450
ind/ha
0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grewia rogersii 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ficus ingens 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cussonia spicata 13 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tecomaria capensis 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maytenus undata 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Syzygium guineense 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Elephantorrhiza burkei 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Combretum molle 20 0 7 0 0 0 40 30 30 8 33 8 22 11 6 0 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 5
Pavetta gardeniifolia 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lannea discolor 7 7 0 0 0 0 90 70 0 75 50 75 0 11 11 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8
Olea capensis 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
82S.E.Nkosietal./SouthAfricanJournalofBotany105(2016)79–88
Strychnos cocculoides 0 7 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 0
Searsia zeyheri 13 0 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 25 42 25 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Albezia harveyi 33 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sclerocarya birrea caffra 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pappea capensis 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ximenia caffra 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ochna pulchra 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Commiphora glandulosa 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lopholaena coriifolia 339 395 302 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 5
Ficus abutilifolia 1036
ind/ha
0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Faurea saligna 0 13 13 0 0 0 17 25 0 50 33 28 42 53 279 0 0 36 9 0 5 0 0 8
Ozoroa sphaerocarpa 13 0 0 0 0 0 25 33 17 39 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 5 0 0 5
Protea caffra 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 5 5 18 0 27 14 0 0 46 0 3
Lippia javanica 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 11 22 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mundulea sericea 101 40 115 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 5 14 0 0 3
Englerophytum
magalismontanum
256
ind/ha
40 40 10 0 0 0 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 5 0 0 0
Ficus cordata 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Diplorhynchus
condylocarpon
70 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Aloe marlothii 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Burkea Africana 30 110 30 0 17 8 0 0 0 5 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Aloe ferox 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tapiphyllum parvifolium 0 20 10 0 17 0 6 6 17 0 0 0 0 9 18 0 5 23 0 0 0
Pseudolanchnostylis
maprouneifolia
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Peltophorum africana 0 30 10 0 0 0 17 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Combretum apiculatum 10 30 0 17 25 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Vangueria infausta 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0
Acacia gerrardi 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dichrostachys cinerea 350 620 160 42 50 8 0 28 0 21 58 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Croton gratissimus 1130
ind/ha
0 0 8 28 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Cussonia arboea 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Myrothamnus
flabellifolia
410 532 398 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Aloe arborescens 1340
ind/ha
0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Combretum
erythrophyllum
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lippia rehmanii 264 314 250 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maytenus albata 828
ind/ha
136 165 601 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maytenus tenuispina 902
ind/ha
18 9 126 0 5 5 0 0 0
Senegalia nigrescens 153
ind/ha
0 9 9 0 0 0
Euclea crispa 42 66 109 0 0 3
Acacia mearnsii 217
ind/ha
0 0 5
46 9 66
121 ind/ha
83S.E.Nkosietal./SouthAfricanJournalofBotany105(2016)79–88
2.1 Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Olea europaea subspecies
africana sub-community
2.2 Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Searsia leptodictya sub-
community
3. Eragrostis curvula–Hyparrhenia hirta old field grassland
4. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor open woodland
4.1 Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Englerophytum magalismontanum
sub-community
4.2 Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Senegalia burkei sub-community
5. Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri–Rhoicissus tridentata rocky shrubland
6. Tristachya leucothrix–Faurea saligna open woodland
7. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex open grassland
7.1 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Tristachya biseriata sub-
community
7.2 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Aristida diffusa sub-community
7.3 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Gladiolus elliottii sub-community
4.2. Plant community descriptions
4.2.1. Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia wetland
This plant community covers approximately 58 ha (1.3%) of the
study area (Fig. 3). It occurs within seasonally wet drainage channels
and seepage lines on the southwestern side of the study area. Patches
are also present in the eastern and central sections and on the central
western boundary. Altitude varies between 1285 and 1406 m above
sea level (m.a.s.l.). Slopes of 0°–9° characterise this area and are accessi-
ble to animals. This plant community is associated with the Ib10 and
Ib17 land types, which are characterised by shallow clay loam to clay
soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 0% and 5%, shrubs between 10%
and 60%, grasses between 20% and 65%, and forbs between 10% and 50%.
Rocks cover between 5% and 10% of the community. Animal activity is
high, with signs of animal droppings, evidence of moderate grazing,
and relatively high trampling. Moderate erosion is visible near an
artificial dam found in this community.
Characteristic species for this community are from species group A
(Table 1). Five sample plots represent this community with an average
of 27 different plant species recorded per plot. Vegetation is dominated
by the shrub Buddleja salviifolia (species group A) and the grass
Sporobolus africanus (species group A). This community has a total
tree density of 620 ind/ha with no individuals taller than 3 m. The
shrub Buddleja salviifolia has 180 ind/ha in the medium height class,
and 120 ind/ha in the lower height class. The prominent woody species
Diospyros lycioides (species group A) has 80 ind/ha in the medium
height class, and 40 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2).
4.2.2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland
This community is scattered throughout the study area, covering ap-
proximately 526 ha (11.8%) of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges
from 1206 to 1310 m.a.s.l. The structure of this community varies
from open to closed woodland with rocky outcrops and gentle slopes
with a gradient of 4°–9°. This community is located in the Ib10 land
type characterised by shallow sandy loam to sandy clay loamsoils
(Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover for this woodland varies between 20% and 90%,
shrub cover between 10% and 70%, grass cover between 5% and 60%, and
forb cover between 5% and 50%. Rocks cover between 10% and 55%. Ero-
sion is visible along game paths, and there are indications of previous
fire damage in the area.
Species belonging to species group B (Table 1) are characteristic for
this plant community. Vegetation is dominated by the tree Senegalia
caffra and the grass Panicum maximum (species group B). Other locally
prominent species include the trees Ziziphus mucronata, Celtis africana,
Heteropyxis natalensis (species group B), Senegalia burkei, Dombeya
rotundifolia, Searsia leptodictya, Albizia harveyi, Searsia pyroides (species
group D), and the grass Setaria sphacelata (species group R). This
community is divided into two sub-communities:
4.2.2.1. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Olea europaea subspecies
africana sub-community. This sub-community covers approximately
55 ha and is located on the north and northeastern side of the study
area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1206 to 1310 m.a.s.l. The area com-
prises gentle north and south facing midslopes with gradients ranging
between 4° and 9°. Signs of animal tracks, mild grazing, and trampling
are visible in this sub-community.
Species from species group C (Table 1) are characteristic for this sub-
community. Four sample plots represent this sub-community, with an
average of 36 different plant species recorded per plot. The herbaceous
layer is not well developed due to high woody cover, and vegetation is
dominated by the trees Senegalia caffra and Olea europaea subspecies
africana (species group B). The grass Panicum maximum (species
group B) is present under trees throughout this sub-community. A
total tree density of 1450 ind/ha was recorded. The tree Senegalia caffra
(species group B) has a tree density of 75 ind/ha in the upper height
class and 100 ind/ha in the medium height class. Olea europaea subspe-
cies africana (species group B) has 50 ind/ha in the upper height class,
25 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 50 ind/ha in the lower height
class (Table 2).
4.2.2.2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Searsia leptodictya sub-
community. This sub-community is located in the central part of the
study area, with patches present in the northern, northeastern, south-
ern, and southwestern sections (Fig. 3). It covers approximately
471 ha. Altitude ranges from 1272 to 1382 m.a.s.l. The habitat is accessi-
ble to wildlife and occurs on gentle north and south facing midslopes
with gradients of 4° to 9°.
Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species
group D (Table 1). Fifteen sample plots were surveyed for this sub-
community, with an average of 33 different plant species recorded per
plot. The vegetation is dominated by the trees Senegalia caffra (Species
group B), Searsia leptodictya (species group D), and the grass Panicum
maximum (species group B). This sub-community has a total tree densi-
ty of 1036 ind/ha. Searsia leptodictya has 33 ind/ha in the upper height
class, 47 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 7 ind/ha in the lower
height class. Senegalia caffra has 87 ind/ha in the upper height class
and 33 ind/ha in the medium height class, and Maytenus alba has
50 ind/ha in the upper height class and 25 ind/ha in the medium height
class (Table 2).
4.2.3. Eragrostis curvula–Hyparrhenia hirta old field grassland
This community covers approximately 252 ha (5.7%) of the study
area and is located on the central, western, and southwestern borders
of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1272 to 1450 m.a.s.l.
Gentle north facing slopes with a gradient of 0°–9° occur in the area.
This community is located in the Fa7 land type, characterised by well-
drained shallow sandy loam to sandy clay loamsoils on hard rock
(Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 0% and 5%. One sample plot is
located on a rocky outcrop and comprises 20% tree cover. Shrubs
cover between 2% and 10% of this community, grasses between 50%
and 90%, and forbs between 10% and 20%. Rocks cover between 5%
and 10%. Evidence of previous crop planting, regular fires, and animal
activity (moderate to high grazing and trampling) is prevalent in this
community. Local people from the surrounding community harvest
thatch grass. There are no signs of soil erosion.
Species from species group E (Table 1) are characteristic for this
community and are represented by 15 sample plots with an average
of 30 different plant species recorded per plot. The anthropogenic
grass Hyparrhenia hirta (species group Q) dominates this community.
Other prominent grass species include Sporobolus africanus (species
group A), Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis curvula, Aristida congesta
84 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
subspecies congesta (species group E), Brachiaria brizantha (species
group J), Schizachyrium sanguineum (species group Q), and Melinis
nerviglumis (species group R). This community has a total tree density
of 256 ind/ha. Trees occur as small clumps on rocky outcrops not previ-
ously ploughed. Tree species include Ziziphus mucronata (species
group K) with 20 ind/ha in the upper height class and 7 ind/ha in the
lower height class, and Searsia leptodictya (species group D) with
13 ind/ha in the upper height class and 0 ind/ha in the lower height
class (Table 2).
4.2.4. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor open woodland
This community is located on the northeastern, central, southern,
and southeastern sections of the study area, covering approximately
393 ha (8.8%) (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1217 to 1391 m.a.s.l. Slopes
range from gentle north, northwest, and southeast facing midslopes
(4°–9°) to moderately steep slopes (10°–15°). Predominant land types
for this community are Fa7, Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. These land types are
characterised by loam, sandy loam, and sandy clay loam soils (Land
Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 30% and 70%, shrubs between
10% and 50%, grasses between 10% and 60%, and forbs between 10%
and 60%. Rocks cover between 30% and 50% and occur as prominent
rocky outcrops. Soil erosion is minimal; however, mild localised sheet
erosion is visible on disturbed rocky areas, along animal paths, and at
destroyed termitariums. Signs of frequent fires are prevalent through-
out the area, with evidence of dead Dichrostachys cinerea trees.
Species from species group F (Table 1) are characteristic for this plant
community. Vegetation in this community is characterised by the domi-
nance of the tree Lannea discolor (species group F) and the grass Setaria
sphacelata (species group R). Other locally prominent species include
the woody Englerophytum magalismontanum, Combretum molle, Burkea
africana, Combretum apiculatum (species group F); the grass Andropogon
chinensis (species group F); and the forb Phymaspermum acerosum
(species group F). This community is divided into two sub-communities:
4.2.4.1. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Englerophytum magalismon-
tanum sub-community. This sub-community is located on the south-
western section of the study area and covers approximately 148 ha
(Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1329 to 1391 m.a.s.l. and comprises gentle
to steep southeast and northwest facing slopes of 4°–25°. Steeper rocky
slopes in this sub-community are inaccessible to animals. Soils range
from sandy loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species
group G (Table 1). Ten sample plots were surveyed with an average of
35 different plant species recorded per plot. This sub-community is
dominated by the trees Lannea discolor, Englerophytum magalismon-
tanum (species group F), and the grasses Loudetia simplex (species
group Q) and Setaria sphacelata (species group R). This sub-
community has a total tree density of 1130 ind/ha with Lannea discolor
having 90 ind/ha in the upper height class and 70 ind/ha in the medium
height class, Englerophytum magalismontanum has 40 ind/ha in the upper
height class, 40 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 10 ind/ha in
the lower height class. The locally prominent tree Diplorhynchus
condylocarpon is represented by 70 ind/ha in the upper height class
and 80 ind/ha in the medium height class (Table 2).
4.2.4.2. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Senegalia burkei sub-
community. This sub-community is located on the northeastern and
southern parts of the study area and is nearly twice the size of sub-
community 4.1, covering approximately 245 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges
from 1217 to 1357 m.a.s.l. This sub-community is characterised by gen-
tle north, northwest, and southeast facing midslopes with a gradient of
4°–9°. The midslopes are accessible to animals, while steep slopes with
gradients of 16°–25° provide limited animal access. Soils range from
loam to sandy loam. The area is covered with loose rocks between 10
and 50 cm in diameter.
Plant species from species group H (Table 1) are characteristic
for this sub-community. Twelve sample plots represent this sub-
community with an average of 39 plant species recorded per plot. This
sub-community has a total tree density of 1340 ind/ha. Vegetation is
dominated by the trees Senegalia burkei with 92 ind/ha in the upper
height class, 58 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 75 ind/ha in
the lower height class (species group D), Lannea discolor with 75 ind/ha
in the upper height class, 50 ind/ha in the medium height class, and
75 ind/ha in the lower height class (species group F) (Tables 1 and 2).
The grass layer is dominated by the grasses Setaria sphacelata and
Themeda triandra (species group R).
4.2.5. Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri–Rhoicissus tridentata rocky shrubland
This plant community occurs as open shrub habitats on the south-
eastern side of the study area; patches on the northern, eastern, central,
and southeastern borders of the study area and on the southwestern
sections of the study area (Fig. 3). It covers approximately 141 ha
(3.7%) and occurs at an altitude ranging between 1325 and
1430 m.a.s.l. This shrubland comprises gentle (4°–9°) to moderately
steep (10°–15°) south and southwest facing midslopes. Predominant
land types in this community include Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. Soils vary
from fine sandy loam and sandy loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type
Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 30% and 60%, shrub cover
between 10% and 40%, grass cover between 10% and 50%, and forb
cover between 10% and 40%. Rock cover ranges from 20% to 45%. Mini-
mal signs of soil erosion were observed. There are indications of animal
activity in the form of moderate grazing, game paths, and trampling.
Evidence of previous fires is prevalent throughout the area.
Characteristic plant species for this community are from species
group I (Table 1). A total of 18 sample plots represent this community
with an average of 41 different plant species recorded per plot. This com-
munity has a total tree density of 828 ind/ha. The vegetation of this com-
munity is characterised by the prominent sprawling shrub Rhoicissus
tridentata (species group B), the dwarf shrub Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri
(species group I), and the grasses Setaria sphacelata (species group
R) and Loudetia simplex (species group Q). Rhoicissus tridentata (species
group B) has 11 ind/ha in the medium height class and 28 ind/ha in
the lower height class. Additional prominent woody species include Cro-
ton gratissimus with 28 ind/ha in the upper height class and 11 ind/ha in
the medium height class, and Combretum molle with 22 ind/ha in the
upper height class, 11 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 6 ind/ha
in the lower height class (Table 2).
4.2.6. Tristachya leucothrix–Faurea saligna open woodland
This community occurs on the northern section of the study area,
covering approximately 708 ha (15.9%) of the study area (Fig. 3). Alti-
tude ranges from 1251 to 1441 m.a.s.l. Slopes range from flat (0°–3°)
to gentle (4°–9°) on south facing midslopes. Land types associated
with this plant community include Fa7 and Ib10. This woodland is
characterised by fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam soils (Land Type
Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 25% and 45%, shrub cover
between 10% and 40%, grass cover between 30% and 70%, and forbs
between 10% and 50%. Rocks cover between 10% and 40% of this com-
munity. Soil erosion is minimal due to a well-developed herbaceous
layer. Evidence of frequent fires is prevalent in the form of dying stands
of Dichrostachys cinerea trees. Mild to moderate trampling is present
and there is evidence of digging by small mammals.
Species from species group K (Table 1) are characteristic for this
community. A total of 19 sample plots were surveyed with an average
of 40 different plant species recorded per plot. Vegetation in this com-
munity is characterised by the dominance of the tree Faurea saligna
(species group K), and by the grasses Tristachya leucothrix and Brachiaria
serrata (species group Q). The grasses Trachypogon spicatus, Panicum
natalense (species group P), and Loudetia simplex (species group
85S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
Q) codominate. Other locally prominent species include Dichrostachys
cinerea, Ozoroa paniculosa, Lippia javanica (species group K), and
Protea caffra (species group O). This community has a total tree density
of 902 ind/ha. Faurea saligna has 42 ind/ha in the upper height class,
53 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 279 ind/ha in the lower
height class. Dichrostachys cinerea has 21 ind/ha in the upper height
class, 58 ind/ha in the medium height class, 79 ind/ha in the lower
height class, and Protea caffra has 47 ind/ha in the upper height class,
5 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 5 ind/ha in the lower height
class (Table 2).
4.2.7. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex open grassland
This is the largest community in the study area and covers approxi-
mately 2379 ha (53.4%). It occurs on the central and southern sections of
the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1318 to 1455 m.a.s.l.
Slopes vary from flat plateau/crests (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) and
steep (16°–25°) south, north, and east facing slopes. Prevalent land
types include Fa7, Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. Soils range from fine sandy
loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988).
Estimated tree cover varies between 5% and 40%, shrubs between 5%
and 30%, grasses between 30% and 80%, and forbs between 5% and 40%.
Rock cover ranges from 5% to 40%, with loose rocks prominent on
slopes. There is evidence of recent fire damage that destroyed several
Protea caffra trees in sub-community 7.3. Signs of animal activity include
low to moderate grazing and trampling in recently burnt areas, digging,
and animal droppings.
Species belonging to species group L are characteristic for this com-
munity (Table 1). Vegetation in this community is dominated by the
grasses Loudetia simplex (species group Q) and Bewsia biflora (species
group R), while Themeda triandra (species group R) and Urelytrum
agropyroides (species group P) are prominent throughout the commu-
nity. The woody layer is not well developed with small scattered clumps
of locally prominent Protea caffra (species group O) trees. This grassland
community is divided into three sub-communities:
4.2.7.1. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Tristachya biseriata
sub-community. This sub-community is located on the southern and
southwestern borders of the study area and covers approximately
202 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1318 to 1466 m.a.s.l. Slopes
range from flat (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) south facing midslopes. The
area is accessible to animals and there is evidence of grazing in recently
burnt areas, trampling, and digging. Soils are shallow fine sandy to
sandy clay loam. The grass layer is well developed, and minimal soil
erosion is present.
This sub-community has no characteristic species group and is
characterised by the absence of species from species groups O and P
(Table 1). A total of 11 sample plots represent the sub-community,
with an average of 34 different plant species per plot. This sub-
community has a total tree density of 153 ind/ha. The vegetation is
dominated by the grasses Loudetia simplex, Tristachya biseriata (species
group Q), Themeda triandra, and Bewsia biflora (species group R). Prom-
inent species include the grasses Brachiaria serrata (species group
Q) and Eragrostis racemosa (species group R), and the woody species
Protea caffra with 18 ind/ha in the upper height class, and 27 ind/ha in
the lower height class, Faurea saligna with 0 ind/ha in the upper,
0 ind/ha in the medium and 36 ind/ha in the lower height classes, and
Tapiphyllum parvifolium with 9 ind/ha in the medium height class and
18 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2).
4.2.7.2. Elionurus muticu–Loudetia simplex–Aristida diffusa sub-
community. This sub-community is located in the south and northeast-
ern section of the study area and covers approximately 926 ha (Fig. 3).
Altitude ranges from 1316 to 1440 m.a.s.l. Slopes vary from flat
plateau/crests (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) north facing midslopes and
steep south facing slopes (16°–25°). Flat and gentle areas are accessible
to wildlife and evidence of animal activity includes grazing, trampling,
digging, and fresh animal droppings. Soil varies from fine sandy loam
to sandy clay loam, with minimal evidence of soil erosion (Land Type
Survey Staff, 1988).
This sub-community is characterised by species found in species
group M (Table 1). A total of 22 sample plots represent this sub-
community with an average of 36 different plant species per plot. This
sub-community has a total tree density of 217 ind/ha. The vegetation
is dominated by the grass Loudetia simplex (species group Q), with the
grasses Themeda triandra, Eragrostis racemosa (species group R),
Tristachya biseriata, Brachiaria serrata (species group Q), and Aristida
diffusa (species group M) being locally prominent. Prominent woody
species include Strychnos cocculoides with 5 ind/ha in the lower, medi-
um, and upper height classes; Lopholaena coriifolia with 14 ind/ha in
the medium and lower height classes; Protea caffra with 3 ind/ha in
the upper height class; and Mundulea sericea with 5 ind/ha in the
medium height class and 14 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2).
4.2.7.3. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Gladiolus elliottii sub-
community. This sub-community is located centrally in the study area
and covers approximately 1251 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1370
to 1455 m.a.s.l. Slopes vary from flat plateaus with a gradient of 0°–3°
to gentle midslopes of 4°–9° that are accessible to wildlife. There is
evidence of moderate grazing and trampling throughout the sub-
community. Soil consists of fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam with
very little evidence of erosion.
Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species
group N (Table 1). A total of 39 sample plots were surveyed for this
sub-community with an average of 36 different plant species recorded
per plot. This sub-community has a total tree density of 121 ind/ha.
The vegetation of this sub-community is dominated by the grasses
Bewsia biflora and Eragrostis racemosa (species group R). Loudetia
simplex, Schizachyrium sanguineum, Digitaria monodactyla (species
group Q), and Hyparrhenia hirta (species group R) codominate. The
prominent woody species in this sub-community is Protea caffra with
46 ind/ha in the upper height class and 3 ind/ha in the lower height
class (Table 2).
Table 3
Species richness, frequency distribution, deviation, and evenness for the Nooitgedacht plant communities.
Community N Species richness/observed Expected frequency Percentage deviation Standardised residuals Sum of all n/N * In(n/N) H Evenness (E)
1 109 14 13.32 2.79 0.1 −2.541 2.541 0.963
2.1 112 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −2.685 2.685 0.896
2.2 186 18 13.32 32.16 1.19 −2.187 2.187 0.757
3 204 21 13.32 54.19 2 −2.499 2.499 0.821
4.1 96 11 13.32 −19.24 −0.71 −2.098 2.098 0.875
4.2 42 7 13.32 −48.6 −1.79 −1.052 1.052 0.541
5 200 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −4.286 4.286 1.431
6 287 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −4.955 4.955 1.654
7.2 155 12 13.32 −11.89 −0.44 −2.769 2.769 1.114
7.3 167 14 13.32 2.79 0.1 −2.357 2.357 0.893
86 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
4.3. Species richness
The numbers of different plant species present in the Nooitgedacht
plant communities are depicted in Table 3 (based on data in Table 1).
4.4. Species diversity
Results from the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index analysis are
presented in Table 3.
5. Discussion
In this study, 11 plant communities were identified within four
structural vegetation units: grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and
wetlands/riverine areas. Grasslands are the dominant vegetation in
the study area, covering 2631 ha (59%). Woodland vegetation covers
1101 ha (25%), wetlands/riverine vegetation covers 584 ha (13%), and
shrublands covers 141 ha (3%). Nooitgedacht is a very diverse area
and comprises 649 species (64% of the reserve's 1016 taxa). One
hundred and ninety-four new species that are not listed for the reserve
occur in the area.
Nooitgedacht is representative of a distributed mosaic grassland and
woodland habitat, referred to as Bankenveld and described as a ‘False
Grass’ veld type (Acocks, 1988; Brown and Bredenkamp, 2003). The cli-
max stage of this veld type should be open Savanna (Acocks, 1988);
however, it has been modified and maintained by regular fires
and grazed as a grassland (Bredenkamp et al., 2006). Bankenveld is
characterised by a complex topography that comprises rocky hills,
ridges, plateaux, valleys, and plains, which are typical of the study
area. Bankenveld areas are also characterised by the presence of rocks
on the soil surface (Brown and Bredenkamp, 2003).
Grassland communities within the study area that have an affinity to
Bankenveld vegetation types, as described by Brown and Bredenkamp
(2003), include plant community 3 that is similar to the Hyparrhenia
hirta anthropogenic grassland (Bankenveld vegetation type 1), and
plant community 7 that is similar to the Monocymbium ceresiiforme–
Loudetia simplex grassland (Bankenveld vegetation type 7). Woodland
community 2 is similar to the Themeda triandra–Vachellia karroo
microphyllous woodland (Bankenveld bushveld vegetation type 11),
woodland community 4 is similar to Ochna pulchra–Englerophytum
magalismontanum warm temperate mountain bushveld (Bankenveld
bushveld vegetation type 10), and woodland community 6 is similar
to Tristachya biseriata–Protea caffra cool temperate mountain bushveld
(Bankenveld bushveld vegetation types 9) (Brown and Bredenkamp,
2003).
Plant communities 1 and 2 (Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia
wetland and Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland) are
ecologically sensitive ecosystems. Wetlands and riverine habitats in the
study area are important due to the multitude of ecosystem services
they provide, including flood attenuation, water storage and channel-
ling, provision of suitable habitat for a variety of plants and animals,
and provision of water to surrounding ecosystems during drought
(Brand, et al., 2011). Although moderate levels of soil erosion were ob-
served, it is important that the reserve management monitor and man-
age this erosion to prevent future problems, especially during times of
drought when animals concentrate in moist areas, overgrazing and
trampling the vegetation.
Woody plant density totals for Nooitgedacht are below the accepted
threshold of 1800 ind/ha for mixed bushveld (Brown, 1997). It is impor-
tant that this density threshold is not exceeded, as this will result in the
rapid loss of veld condition. It is recommended that regular monitoring
be undertaken to ensure woody species densities remain below
1800 ind/ha, and that should numbers increase above this, appropriate
management action be taken. Sub-communities 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, and 4.2
have the highest woody densities (Table 2), and are typical of bushveld
vegetation. Height of woody species is normally distributed for sub-
community 2.2 and community 4, with the majority of woody species
in the medium height class. Sub-community 2.1 has the largest number
of species within the upper height class. Plant communities with the
highest densities of woody species (in excess of 1000 ind/ha) include
sub-communities 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, and 4.2. Plant communities 1, 5, and 6
have woody species densities that range between 600 and 900 ind/ha.
The lowest woody species densities recorded for study area are for
plant community 3 and sub-communities 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 (grassland
communities) (Table 2). None of the communities in the study area
have woody species densities that have a negative influence on veld
condition. No woody species dominates the vegetation in the study
area and there is no bush densification or encroachment.
The majority of woody species found in grassland communities at
the study site have an aggregated spatial distribution. Woody species
in woodland communities are more evenly distributed. Woody species
in the lower height classes occur close to their ‘mother’ plants. Overall
woody species densities for the study area are normal and indicate
that the area is well managed. There are no indications of bush en-
croachment and the habitat is suitable for browsers and herbivores
that prefer longer grasses for grazing and hiding their young.
For Nooitgedacht, average species diversity per sample plot is 35.
Plant communities 5 and 6 and sub-community 2.1 have the highest
species diversity (n = 20), followed by sub-community 2.2 (n = 18).
Species diversity for plant community 1 and sub-community 7.3 are
the same (n = 14) (Table 3). There was a significant association be-
tween species richness values and communities surveyed x2
(13) =
3.154, P b 0.001. Based on standardised residuals, plant communities 5
and 6 and sub-community 2.1 are over represented (+1.7), and the
main contributors to the association. The association between the
Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index value (H) for the surveyed plant
communities was not significant x2
(13) = 0.000, P = 1.000. Plant com-
munity 5 had an H value of 4.286, and plant community 6 had an H value
of 4.955. These results indicate increased diversity for communities 5
and 6. Plant community 6 (E 1.654) has the most even distribution of
species followed by plant community 5 (E 1.431) and sub-community
7.2 (E 1.114) (Table 3).
From the 11 identified plant communities in the study area, four
plant communities (3, 6 and sub-communities 2.2 and 4.1) were previ-
ously described by different researchers (Theron, 1973; Bezuidenhout
et al., 1994; Cilliers et al., 1999; Filmalter, 2010). Seven plant communi-
ties (1, 5 and sub-communities 2.1, 4.2, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) are considered
new plant communities and have not previously been described for the
reserve.
Plant communities 2 and 5 and sub-community 4.2 have affinities
with each other due to the presence of common species from species
group B. The grass Panicum maximum, characteristic of woody habitats
(Van Oudtshoorn, 2012), and the tree Ziziphus mucronata are prominent
in these plant communities. Sub-communities 2.2 and 4.2 have a strong
relationship in terms of their woody component, with the tree Senegalia
burkei (species group D) being prominent in both sub-communities,
however, sub-community 2.2 is wetter than 4.2.
The different land types present in the area are associated with the
different plant communities. The open grassland areas are mostly
associated with the Fa land type, while the woodland and wetland
areas are associated with the Ib land type.
6. Conclusion
Prior to this research, limited information existed for the flora of the
Nooitgedacht section of the LDNR. This study provides valuable infor-
mation on the plant communities occurring in the study area, indicating
affinities in vegetation structure and composition with typical sourish
mixed bushveld and Bankenveld. Similarities are evident in open grass-
lands with scattered trees, and semi-open woodlands on hillsides.
The recently acquired Nooitgedacht section provides both new
habitats and increases the size of existing habitats for browsers, grazers,
87S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
and mixed feeders. This area is suitable for the endangered Sable
antelope (Hippotragus niger) and the reserve's priority species, Oribi
(Ourebia ourebia). Currently, the reserve maintains a stocking rate of
11–12 ha/AU, which includes Nooitgedacht. All fences between the
new area and the main reserve have been removed. We recommend
that the current fire regime for the reserve be applied to the new area
to ensure moribund plant material is removed on a regular basis, and
to create a mosaic of habitats. We further recommend the adoption of
a patch mosaic burning approach for the area, as this creates ideal
habitat for Oribi.
The critically endangered and specially protected plant Encephalartos
middelburgensis (Mpumalanga Province, 2005) and a rare plant
Harworthia koelmaniorum var. mcmurtryi (Biko'o et al., 2011) occur
within the study area. It is important that these species and their
habitats are protected to ensure their survival and to increase their
population sizes. We recommend that these species and their habi-
tats be monitored on a regular basis to prevent loss of habitat.
Four communities (3 and 6, and sub-communities 2.2 and 4.1) of the
11 identified plant communities for the study area have previously been
described for the reserve by Theron (1973). Seven are new plant com-
munities (1 and 5, and sub-communities 2.1, 4.2, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) not
previously identified or described. The addition of new plant communi-
ties provides new habitats, new opportunities, and new resources for
existing and potentially new animal species. The increase in sizes of
existing plant communities enlarges the size of the habitats these pro-
vide, increasing resources and allowing for an increase in the sizes of
existing animal populations.
Successful application of the popular Braun–Blanquet classification
system resulted in the achievement of our objectives for this study.
We identified and described the floristic composition of the various
plant communities at Nooitgedacht, classified the plant communities
based on species dominance, and mapped the plant communities. An
association between land types and plant communities for the study
area has been observed, indicating the importance of using land types
in plant community delineation. Our results indicate that the vegetation
for the Nooitgedacht section is well managed and in a natural state with
minimal degradation. The findings generated by this study could be
used to supplement existing management objectives for the reserve.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.199.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the staff and management of MTPA, particu-
larly the staff at LDNR, for making this research possible.
References
Acocks, J.P.H., 1988. Veld Types of South Africa. Botanic Research Institute, South Africa.
Bezuidenhout, H., 1993. Syntaxonomy and Synecology of Western Transvaal Grasslands,
South Africa Ph.D. Thesis. University of Pretoria.
Bezuidenhout, H., Bredenkamp, G.J., Theron, G.K., 1994. The syntaxonomy of the vegeta-
tion of the Fb land type in the western Transvaal Grassland, South Africa. South
African Journal of Botany 60, 72–81.
Biko'o, A.A., Du Plessis, G.D.C., Myburgh, W.J., 2011. Population size, structure and habitat
features of Haworthia koelmaniorum var. mcmurtryi, an endemic plant from
Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Koedoe 53, 31–40.
Brand, R.F., Brown, L.R., Du Preez, P.J., 2011. The Grassland vegetation of Platberg, Eastern
Free State. South Africa. koedoe 53, 66–78.
Bredenkamp, G., Theron, G., 1978. A synecological account of the Suikerbosrand Nature
Reserve 1. The phytosociology of the Witwatersrand geological system. Bothalia 12,
513–529.
Bredenkamp, G.J., Brown, L.R., Pfab, M.F., 2006. Conservation value of the Egoli Granite
Grassland, an endemic grassland in Gauteng, South Africa. Koedoe 49, 59–66.
Brown, L.R., 1997. A Plant Ecological Study and Wildlife Management Plan for Borakalalo
Nature Reserve, North-West Province Ph.D. Dissertation University of Pretoria,
Pretoria.
Brown, L.R., Bredenkamp, G., 1994. The phytosociology of the southern section of
Borakalalo Nature Reserve, South Africa. Koedoe 37, 59–72.
Brown, L.R., Bredenkamp, G.J., 2003. A reappraisal of Acocks Bankenveld: origin and
diversity of vegetation types. South African Journal of Botany 69, 7–26.
Brown, L.R., Du Preez, P.J., Bezuidenhout, H., Bredenkamp, G.J., Mostert, T.H.C., Collins,
N.B., 2013. Guidelines for phytosociological classifications and descriptions of vegeta-
tion in southern Africa. Koedoe 55, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.
1103.
Cilliers, S.S., Van Wyk, E., Bredenkamp, G., 1999. Urban nature conservation: vegetation of
natural areas in the Potchefstroom municipal area, North-West Province, South
Africa. Koedoe 42, 1–30.
Coetzee, B.J., 1975. A phytosociological classification of the vegetation of the Rustenburg
Nature Reserve. Bothalia 11, 561–580.
Edwards, D., 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of vegetation for practical
purposes. Bothalia 14, 705–712.
Eksteen, J.J., 2003. Condensed Management Plan for Loskop Dam Nature Reserve—1st
Draft. Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, Nelspruit.
ESRI, 2014. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2.1.
Ferrar, A.A., Lötter, M.C., 2007. Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan Handbook.
Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, Nelspruit.
Filmalter, N., 2010. A Vegetation Classification and Management Plan for the Hondekraal
Section of the Loskop Dam Nature Reserve M.Sc. Dissertation. University of South
Africa.
Fitzpatrick, R.W., Hahne, H.C.H., Kirsten, W.F.A., Hawker, L.C., 1986. Soil mineralogy. In: du
Plessis, H.M. (Ed.), Land Types of the 2526 Rustenburg, 2528 Pretoria. Memoirs of the
Botanical Survey of South Africa (Pretoria).
Götze, A.R., Meyer, S.S., Cilliers, S.S., Kellner, K., 1998. The Classification of Plant Commu-
nities and Range Condition Assessment of Two New Parts of Loskop Dam Nature
Reserve, Mpumalanga. Unpublished report, Potchefstroom University.
Hennekens, S.M., 1996. TURBOVEG: A Software Package for Input, Processing and
Presentation of Phytosociological Data. Users' Guide, Version July 1996, IBN-DLO.
Wageningen and Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Hill, M.O., 1979. TWINSPAN: a Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an or-
dered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology And
Systematics, Cornel University, Ithaca.
Land Type Survey Staff, 1988. Land Types of the Maps 2526 Rustenburg and 2528
Pretoria.
Mpumalanga Province, 2005. Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency Act of 2005
(Nelspruit).
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C., 2006. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland,
Strelitzia (doi:10.1007/s).
Mueller-Dombois, D., Ellenberg, H., 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology.
Wiley, New York.
Rolecěk, J., Tichỳ, L., Zelenỳ, D., Chytrỳ, M., 2009. Modified TWINSPAN classification in
which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science
20, 596–602.
Rouget, M., Reyers, B., Jonas, Z., Desmet, P., Driver, A., Maze, K., Egoh, B., Cowling, R.M.,
Mucina, L., Rutherford, M., 2004. South African National Spatial Biodiversity
Assessment Technical Report. Volume 1: Terrestrial Component. Pretoria.
Shannon, C.E., Wiener, W., 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinois
University Press, Urbana.
Theron, G., 1973. N’ Ekologiese Studie Van Die plantegroei Van Die Loskopdam
Natuurreservaat D. Sc. Thesis. University of Pretoria.
Tichy, L., 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science
13, 451–453.
Van der Maarel, E., 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology
and its effects on community similarity. Vegetation 39, 97–114.
Van Oudtshoorn, F., 2012. Guide to Grasses of Southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria.
Weger, M.J.A., 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the Zürich-Montpellier
method of vegetation survey. Bothalia 11, 309–323.
Westfall, R.H., 1981. The Plant Ecology of the Farm Groothoek, Thabazimbi District M.Sc.
Dissertation University of Pretoria.
88 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88

More Related Content

What's hot

Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...Innspub Net
 
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...Alexander Decker
 
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...Valderes Sarnaglia
 
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...Alexander Decker
 
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantation
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantationStatus of native woody species regeneration in the plantation
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantationAlexander Decker
 
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...Innspub Net
 
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011Fernando Goulart
 
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...Alexander Decker
 
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aob
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aobKinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aob
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aobVijayalaxmi Kinhal
 
Thesis_rev100206EP
Thesis_rev100206EPThesis_rev100206EP
Thesis_rev100206EPErkki Palmu
 
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...Innspub Net
 
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...Écio Diniz
 
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...Shujaul Mulk Khan
 
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on Aride
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on ArideAn investigation of the vegetation dynamics on Aride
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on ArideRobert Gavan
 
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern Sweden
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern SwedenThe long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern Sweden
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern SwedenTove Hultberg
 
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...Innspub Net
 

What's hot (20)

Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
Diversity and distribution of butterflies in the open and close canopy forest...
 
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...
Effect of human settlement and altitude on rangeland herbaceous species biodi...
 
Farrington Final Draft
Farrington Final DraftFarrington Final Draft
Farrington Final Draft
 
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...
patterns and determinants of floristic variation across lowland forests of bo...
 
Ek36835840
Ek36835840Ek36835840
Ek36835840
 
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...
Vegetation development dynamics of fire experimental plots at olokemeji fores...
 
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantation
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantationStatus of native woody species regeneration in the plantation
Status of native woody species regeneration in the plantation
 
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...
A numerical analysis of understory plant associations in a Pinus wallichiana ...
 
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011
Frugivory homegardengoulartetal2011
 
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...
Woody plant inventory and diversity in traditional agroforestry of selected p...
 
Syndromes
SyndromesSyndromes
Syndromes
 
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aob
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aobKinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aob
Kinhal_Parathasarathy_2010_aob
 
02. Mendez - Research Proposal
02. Mendez - Research Proposal02. Mendez - Research Proposal
02. Mendez - Research Proposal
 
Thesis_rev100206EP
Thesis_rev100206EPThesis_rev100206EP
Thesis_rev100206EP
 
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
Quantification of deadwood littered by Acacia spp. in semi-arid ecosystems of...
 
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...
Long-term monitoring of diversity and structure of two stands of an Atlantic ...
 
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...
Ecological assessment of plant communities in the peochar valley of the hindu...
 
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on Aride
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on ArideAn investigation of the vegetation dynamics on Aride
An investigation of the vegetation dynamics on Aride
 
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern Sweden
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern SwedenThe long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern Sweden
The long-term history of temperate broadleaves in southern Sweden
 
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...
Effect of storage methods of cassava planting materials on establishment and ...
 

Similar to Article - Vegetation ecology of the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga

this is the information we need from online
this is the information we need from onlinethis is the information we need from online
this is the information we need from onlineAsmera Amde
 
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...EdytaSierka
 
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...Liashenko Dmytro
 
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)Rachel Karlov
 
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystem
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystemApplication of remote sensing in forest ecosystem
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystemaliya nasir
 
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdf
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdfapplied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdf
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdfAgathaHaselvin
 
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...Shujaul Mulk Khan
 
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...AI Publications
 
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...Shujaul Mulk Khan
 
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...Alexander Decker
 
Human wildlife conflict in banke national park,nepal
Human wildlife conflict in  banke national park,nepalHuman wildlife conflict in  banke national park,nepal
Human wildlife conflict in banke national park,nepalkpkc1633
 
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approach
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approachPhytogeographic classification using multivariate approach
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approachShujaul Mulk Khan
 
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...inventionjournals
 
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...Shujaul Mulk Khan
 
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...Alexander Decker
 
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...Open Access Research Paper
 
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedges
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedgesPhytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedges
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedgesShujaul Mulk Khan
 
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...IJERA Editor
 
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...IJERA Editor
 

Similar to Article - Vegetation ecology of the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga (20)

this is the information we need from online
this is the information we need from onlinethis is the information we need from online
this is the information we need from online
 
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...
The effect of flooded mine subsidence on thrips and forest biodiversity in th...
 
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...
Geoinformation monitoring of regenerative successions at the territory of Kho...
 
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
Karlov_GIS_Mapping_Final (2)
 
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystem
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystemApplication of remote sensing in forest ecosystem
Application of remote sensing in forest ecosystem
 
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdf
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdfapplied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdf
applied_vegetation_science-applied_vegetation_science.pdf
 
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...
Ecological gradient analyses of plant associations in the thandiani forests o...
 
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...
Impacts of fires on the woody stratum of Mbam and Djerem National Park (Camer...
 
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...
Vegetation mapping and multivariate approach to indicator species of a forest...
 
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...
Seasonal variation of litter arthropods in some eucalyptus plantations at the...
 
Human wildlife conflict in banke national park,nepal
Human wildlife conflict in  banke national park,nepalHuman wildlife conflict in  banke national park,nepal
Human wildlife conflict in banke national park,nepal
 
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approach
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approachPhytogeographic classification using multivariate approach
Phytogeographic classification using multivariate approach
 
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...
Mapping and Monitoring Spatial-Temporal Cover Change of Prosopis Species Colo...
 
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...
Plant species and communities assessment in interaction with edaphic and topo...
 
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...
Influence of seasonality and eucalyptus plantation types on the abundance and...
 
ECOL313_MANUSCRIPT
ECOL313_MANUSCRIPTECOL313_MANUSCRIPT
ECOL313_MANUSCRIPT
 
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...
Floristic composition, diversity and structure of woody vegetation in the agr...
 
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedges
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedgesPhytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedges
Phytogeographic analysis and diversity of grasses and sedges
 
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
 
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
Climatic variability and spatial distribution of herbaceous fodders in the Su...
 

Article - Vegetation ecology of the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga

  • 1. Vegetation ecology of the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga S.E. Nkosi ⁎, A.S. Barrett, L.R. Brown Applied Behavioural Ecology and Ecosystem Research Unit, Department of Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Private bag X6, Florida 1710, South Africa a b s t r a c ta r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 9 November 2015 Received in revised form 3 February 2016 Accepted 9 February 2016 Available online xxxx Edited by Richard Cowling Vegetation descriptions and maps derived from vegetation classification exercises are important management tools for conservation managers in protected areas. This study classifies, describes, and maps the vegetation of a recently acquired area, the Nooitgedacht section of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve. Nooitgedacht is unique in that it resembles Bankenveld vegetation and differs from previously described areas in the reserve. The Braun– Blanquet approach was used for classifying the different plant communities. A total of 170 sample plots (100 m2 ) were placed in all homogeneous vegetation units in a randomly stratified manner. Plant species and various habitat variables were recorded for each plot. Plant community data were analysed using the JUICE soft- ware package. A modified TWINSPAN classification was done to classify the different plant communities in the study area. 11 plant communities, grouped into seven major groups, were identified. These plant communities are distributed across open and closed woodlands, grasslands, and wetland areas. Four new plant communities were identified for the reserve. Results indicate that plant communities 5 and 6 have the highest species diversity and should be managed to prevent loss of diversity. A vegetation map of the identified plant communities was produced using ArcGIS. © 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Bankenveld Phytosociology Braun–Blanquet Plant communities JUICE TWINSPAN Tree density Species diversity Shannon–Wiener 1. Introduction Vegetation classification and mapping are widely used tools for the interpretation and description of natural ecosystems and habitats (Brown et al., 2013). These tools are used to facilitate decision making for the management of protected areas (Bredenkamp and Theron, 1978). According to Rouget et al. (2004), information derived from the classification of vegetation provides a good representation of the biodi- versity found in an area since most animals, birds, insects, and other organisms are associated with particular plant communities. Loskop Dam Nature Reserve (LDNR) is one of the largest and oldest reserves in the Mpumalanga province and is currently managed by the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency (MTPA) (Ferrar and Lötter, 2007). The reserve was established in 1942, proclaimed as a nature re- serve in 1954 (Eksteen, 2003), and subsequently expanded through the occasional incorporation of additional farms. The current size of LDNR is 23,175 ha (Ferrar and Lötter, 2007). LDNR lies on the transition zone between the Grassland and the Savanna biomes (Eksteen, 2003). Vegetation on higher lying areas is typical of the grassland biome, while the lower lying areas represent the Savanna biome (Eksteen, 2003; Mucina and Rutherford, 2006). According to Acocks (1988), veld types represented on the reserve include Mixed Bushveld (Veld type 18), Sourish Mixed Bushveld (Veld type 19), and Bankenveld (Veld type 61). Mucina and Rutherford (2006) provide a more refined description of the LDNR vegetation and suggest that the two main veld types occurring on the reserve are Central Sandy Bushveld (SVcb12) and Loskop Mountain Bushveld (SVcb13). Theron (1973) undertook the first detailed vegetation classification and description for the original reserve. The Parys and Rietfontein sec- tions of the reserve were later added to the northeastern boundary of the reserve and were classified and mapped by Götze et al. (1998). The Hondekraal section (3347 ha) was incorporated into the reserve during the 1990s and a vegetation classification and description was undertaken by Filmalter (2010). This study classifies, describes, and maps the plant communities of the Nooitgedacht section. The aims of this paper were i. to identify and describe the floristic composition of the various plant communities found in the study area ii. to classify the different plant communities according to the domi- nant plant species occurring in them iii. to map the plant communities South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88 ⁎ Corresponding author. E-mail address: nkosise@unisa.ac.za (S.E. Nkosi). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.199 0254-6299/© 2016 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect South African Journal of Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb
  • 2. 2. Study area Loskop Dam Nature Reserve is situated in Mpumalanga province, approximately 55 km North of Middelburg in the Olifants River valley at latitude 25°22′ to 25°31′ South, and 29°10′ to 29°24′ East (Fig. 1). The Nooitgedacht section covers approximately 4457 ha and is located on the northwestern boundary of the reserve (Fig. 1). LDNR occurs in the summer rainfall region of South Africa and has warm to very hot summers with moderate winters. Rainfall occurs mainly as showers and high intensity thunderstorms, often accompa- nied by severe lightning and strong, gusty, southwesterly winds. The majority of rainfall occurs during the hot summer months (November to April). The mean long-term rainfall (2004 to 2014) for LDNR is 650 mm per annum. Rainfall and temperature data for the study period (2010 to 2012) were collected at a weather station located at the reserve's main office (Fig. 2). The Nooitgedacht section occurs on the higher lying areas of the reserve and resembles typical grassland vegetation. Soils are predomi- nantly shallow interspersed with prominent rocky outcrops, while deeper soils occur in lower lying areas. Land types describe the different soil and climate patterns for an area (Fitzpatrick et al., 1986). Mucina and Rutherford (2006) defined a land type as a map unit that can be mapped at 1:250,000 scale. Land types identified in the study area in- clude Fa7, Ib17, Ib10, and Ib13. Fa7 and Ib10 land types occur on shallow soils with underlying hard rock or fractured and weathering rock material; lime is rare or absent (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Ib10 Fig. 1. Location of the study area in Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga. Fig. 2. Rainfall and temperature data for the study period. 80 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 3. and Ib13 land types have in excess of 60% rock cover and occur on shallow soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). 3. Materials and methods The Braun–Blanquet approach to vegetation classification and description was used for this study. Homogenous vegetation units were delineated using a series of 1:50,000 stereo aerial photographs. A total of 170 sample plots were identified and placed in a randomly stratified manner in delineated vegetation units (Bezuidenhout, 1993; Brown and Bredenkamp, 1994). Additional sample plots were placed in larger vegetation units to ensure sufficient sampling (Brown et al., 2013). GPS coordinates of all sample plots were recorded. Predetermined sample plot sizes (100 m2 ) were used based on surveys done in Savanna vegetation (Weger, 1974; Coetzee, 1975; Bezuidenhout, 1993). Data were collected over two growing seasons from November 2010 to April 2012. 3.1. Data collection Using a modified Braun–Blanquet cover abundance scale, species presence and percentage cover of the different vegetation layers (trees, shrubs, and herbaceous) were recorded (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg, 1974). The number of woody plants in three different height classes (Lower 0–1 m, Medium N1–3 m and Upper N3 m) was also re- corded (Brown and Bredenkamp, 1994). Environmental and related variables collected included plot location (GPS coordinates); plot num- ber; accessibility of the area to wildlife (signs of grazing, browsing, trampling, droppings, paths); signs of fire (current and previous); slope (flat 0°–3°, gentle 3.1°–9°, moderate 9.1°–15°, steep 15.1°–25°, and very steep 25.1°–55°) (Westfall, 1981); altitude (metres above sea level); and aspect (north, northeast, east, southeast, south, southwest, west, and northwest). Total tree density (TTD) within each sample plot was determined by counting the number of trees per species present. Trees and shrubs were distinguished from one another using the guidelines set by Edwards (1983). 3.2. Data analysis Floristic and habitat data were captured using TURBOVEG (Hennekens, 1996). All relevé data were exported as a Cornell Con- densed species file into JUICE 7.0 (Tichy, 2002) for editing, classifying, and analysing floristic data into a preliminary phytosociological table. A modified TWINSPAN (Hill, 1979; Rolecěk et al., 2009) classification was performed using Whittaker's beta-diversity to derive a first approx- imation of the plant communities for the study area. Pseudo-species cut levels were set at 0–1-5-25-55-75, and the phytosociological table was manually refined according to Braun–Blanquet procedures (Brown et al., 2013). A vegetation map of the classified plant communities was produced using ArcGIS 10 (ESRI, 2014). Tree density (ind/ha) was calculated for each plant community per height class using the following formula: Tree density ¼ Total number of trees per plant community  10; 000 m2 À Á Total size of sample plots for plant community Data collected using the Braun–Blanquet cover abundance scale (Table 1) were transformed from an alpha-numeric scale to a numerical scale (‘r’ = 1,’1’ = 2, ‘+’ = 3, ‘2a’ = 5, ‘2b’ = 6, ‘3’ = 7, ‘4’ = 8, ‘5’ = 9) to calculate species diversity (H) and evenness (E) for the different plant communities (Van der Maarel, 1979). Shannon–Wiener diversity indices were determined and compared using H and E (Shannon and Wiener, 1963). 4. Results 4.1. Vegetation classification A modified TWINSPAN classification resulted in the identification of eleven plant communities grouped into seven major communities and presented in Table 1 (Fig. 3): 1. Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia wetland 2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland Fig. 3. Vegetation map of the Nooitgedacht section. 81S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 4. Table 2 Woody species density per height class for the different plant communities (L = Lower, M = Medium, U = Upper). Plant community number 1 2.1 2.2 3 4.1 4.2 5 6 7.1 7.2 7.3 Height Classes U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L U M L Diospyros lycioides 0 80 40 0 0 7 0 10 10 0 6 0 Grewia occidentalis 0 40 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 Vachellia karroo 0 20 20 0 0 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buddleja salviifolia 0 180 120 0 20 0 0 20 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 Celtis africana 0 20 20 125 0 0 13 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 0 Searsia pyroides 0 20 0 0 0 25 33 0 7 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 28 0 11 0 0 0 9 Robinia pseudo-acacia 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rhoicissus tridentata 0 420 200 0 0 75 0 20 53 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 11 28 0 0 0 0 0 9 Ziziphus mucronata 620 ind/ha 0 0 100 7 20 40 20 0 7 0 0 0 17 17 33 6 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Senegalia caffra 75 100 0 87 33 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 50 33 33 28 6 28 11 16 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 Searsia leptodictya 25 25 25 33 47 7 27 0 13 0 40 0 0 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 Illex mitis 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Gymnosporia buxifolia 0 0 25 0 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maytenus alba 50 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rhamnus pyroides 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grewia monticola 25 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cussonia paniculosa 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Olea europaea subsp. Africanaolea europaea subsp. africanaOlea europaea subsp. africanaOlea europaea subsp. africanaOlea europaea subsp. africana 50 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 Mimusops zeyheri 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Berchemia zeyheri 0 0 25 0 20 33 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diospyros whyteana 0 50 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Searsia magalismontana 25 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ozoroa paniculosa 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dombeya rotundifolia 0 0 25 27 33 0 7 0 0 0 20 20 17 17 17 0 22 28 0 11 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senegalia burkei 75 0 0 13 27 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 58 75 6 0 0 5 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Euclea divinorum 50 0 0 0 7 13 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vepris lanceolata 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heteropyxis natalensis 600 350 500 13 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 17 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 3 8 Euclea natalensis 1450 ind/ha 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grewia rogersii 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ficus ingens 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cussonia spicata 13 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tecomaria capensis 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maytenus undata 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Syzygium guineense 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elephantorrhiza burkei 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combretum molle 20 0 7 0 0 0 40 30 30 8 33 8 22 11 6 0 0 11 0 0 9 0 0 5 0 0 5 Pavetta gardeniifolia 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lannea discolor 7 7 0 0 0 0 90 70 0 75 50 75 0 11 11 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 8 Olea capensis 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 82S.E.Nkosietal./SouthAfricanJournalofBotany105(2016)79–88
  • 5. Strychnos cocculoides 0 7 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 Searsia zeyheri 13 0 7 0 0 7 10 0 0 25 42 25 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Albezia harveyi 33 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sclerocarya birrea caffra 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pappea capensis 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ximenia caffra 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ochna pulchra 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 Commiphora glandulosa 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lopholaena coriifolia 339 395 302 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 14 14 0 0 5 Ficus abutilifolia 1036 ind/ha 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Faurea saligna 0 13 13 0 0 0 17 25 0 50 33 28 42 53 279 0 0 36 9 0 5 0 0 8 Ozoroa sphaerocarpa 13 0 0 0 0 0 25 33 17 39 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 5 5 0 0 5 Protea caffra 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 5 5 18 0 27 14 0 0 46 0 3 Lippia javanica 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 33 0 0 11 22 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mundulea sericea 101 40 115 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 5 14 0 0 3 Englerophytum magalismontanum 256 ind/ha 40 40 10 0 0 0 22 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 5 0 0 0 Ficus cordata 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diplorhynchus condylocarpon 70 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aloe marlothii 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Burkea Africana 30 110 30 0 17 8 0 0 0 5 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aloe ferox 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tapiphyllum parvifolium 0 20 10 0 17 0 6 6 17 0 0 0 0 9 18 0 5 23 0 0 0 Pseudolanchnostylis maprouneifolia 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peltophorum africana 0 30 10 0 0 0 17 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combretum apiculatum 10 30 0 17 25 8 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vangueria infausta 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 Acacia gerrardi 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dichrostachys cinerea 350 620 160 42 50 8 0 28 0 21 58 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Croton gratissimus 1130 ind/ha 0 0 8 28 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Cussonia arboea 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Myrothamnus flabellifolia 410 532 398 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Aloe arborescens 1340 ind/ha 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Combretum erythrophyllum 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lippia rehmanii 264 314 250 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maytenus albata 828 ind/ha 136 165 601 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Maytenus tenuispina 902 ind/ha 18 9 126 0 5 5 0 0 0 Senegalia nigrescens 153 ind/ha 0 9 9 0 0 0 Euclea crispa 42 66 109 0 0 3 Acacia mearnsii 217 ind/ha 0 0 5 46 9 66 121 ind/ha 83S.E.Nkosietal./SouthAfricanJournalofBotany105(2016)79–88
  • 6. 2.1 Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Olea europaea subspecies africana sub-community 2.2 Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Searsia leptodictya sub- community 3. Eragrostis curvula–Hyparrhenia hirta old field grassland 4. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor open woodland 4.1 Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Englerophytum magalismontanum sub-community 4.2 Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Senegalia burkei sub-community 5. Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri–Rhoicissus tridentata rocky shrubland 6. Tristachya leucothrix–Faurea saligna open woodland 7. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex open grassland 7.1 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Tristachya biseriata sub- community 7.2 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Aristida diffusa sub-community 7.3 Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Gladiolus elliottii sub-community 4.2. Plant community descriptions 4.2.1. Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia wetland This plant community covers approximately 58 ha (1.3%) of the study area (Fig. 3). It occurs within seasonally wet drainage channels and seepage lines on the southwestern side of the study area. Patches are also present in the eastern and central sections and on the central western boundary. Altitude varies between 1285 and 1406 m above sea level (m.a.s.l.). Slopes of 0°–9° characterise this area and are accessi- ble to animals. This plant community is associated with the Ib10 and Ib17 land types, which are characterised by shallow clay loam to clay soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 0% and 5%, shrubs between 10% and 60%, grasses between 20% and 65%, and forbs between 10% and 50%. Rocks cover between 5% and 10% of the community. Animal activity is high, with signs of animal droppings, evidence of moderate grazing, and relatively high trampling. Moderate erosion is visible near an artificial dam found in this community. Characteristic species for this community are from species group A (Table 1). Five sample plots represent this community with an average of 27 different plant species recorded per plot. Vegetation is dominated by the shrub Buddleja salviifolia (species group A) and the grass Sporobolus africanus (species group A). This community has a total tree density of 620 ind/ha with no individuals taller than 3 m. The shrub Buddleja salviifolia has 180 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 120 ind/ha in the lower height class. The prominent woody species Diospyros lycioides (species group A) has 80 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 40 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland This community is scattered throughout the study area, covering ap- proximately 526 ha (11.8%) of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1206 to 1310 m.a.s.l. The structure of this community varies from open to closed woodland with rocky outcrops and gentle slopes with a gradient of 4°–9°. This community is located in the Ib10 land type characterised by shallow sandy loam to sandy clay loamsoils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover for this woodland varies between 20% and 90%, shrub cover between 10% and 70%, grass cover between 5% and 60%, and forb cover between 5% and 50%. Rocks cover between 10% and 55%. Ero- sion is visible along game paths, and there are indications of previous fire damage in the area. Species belonging to species group B (Table 1) are characteristic for this plant community. Vegetation is dominated by the tree Senegalia caffra and the grass Panicum maximum (species group B). Other locally prominent species include the trees Ziziphus mucronata, Celtis africana, Heteropyxis natalensis (species group B), Senegalia burkei, Dombeya rotundifolia, Searsia leptodictya, Albizia harveyi, Searsia pyroides (species group D), and the grass Setaria sphacelata (species group R). This community is divided into two sub-communities: 4.2.2.1. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Olea europaea subspecies africana sub-community. This sub-community covers approximately 55 ha and is located on the north and northeastern side of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1206 to 1310 m.a.s.l. The area com- prises gentle north and south facing midslopes with gradients ranging between 4° and 9°. Signs of animal tracks, mild grazing, and trampling are visible in this sub-community. Species from species group C (Table 1) are characteristic for this sub- community. Four sample plots represent this sub-community, with an average of 36 different plant species recorded per plot. The herbaceous layer is not well developed due to high woody cover, and vegetation is dominated by the trees Senegalia caffra and Olea europaea subspecies africana (species group B). The grass Panicum maximum (species group B) is present under trees throughout this sub-community. A total tree density of 1450 ind/ha was recorded. The tree Senegalia caffra (species group B) has a tree density of 75 ind/ha in the upper height class and 100 ind/ha in the medium height class. Olea europaea subspe- cies africana (species group B) has 50 ind/ha in the upper height class, 25 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 50 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.2.2. Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra–Searsia leptodictya sub- community. This sub-community is located in the central part of the study area, with patches present in the northern, northeastern, south- ern, and southwestern sections (Fig. 3). It covers approximately 471 ha. Altitude ranges from 1272 to 1382 m.a.s.l. The habitat is accessi- ble to wildlife and occurs on gentle north and south facing midslopes with gradients of 4° to 9°. Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species group D (Table 1). Fifteen sample plots were surveyed for this sub- community, with an average of 33 different plant species recorded per plot. The vegetation is dominated by the trees Senegalia caffra (Species group B), Searsia leptodictya (species group D), and the grass Panicum maximum (species group B). This sub-community has a total tree densi- ty of 1036 ind/ha. Searsia leptodictya has 33 ind/ha in the upper height class, 47 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 7 ind/ha in the lower height class. Senegalia caffra has 87 ind/ha in the upper height class and 33 ind/ha in the medium height class, and Maytenus alba has 50 ind/ha in the upper height class and 25 ind/ha in the medium height class (Table 2). 4.2.3. Eragrostis curvula–Hyparrhenia hirta old field grassland This community covers approximately 252 ha (5.7%) of the study area and is located on the central, western, and southwestern borders of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1272 to 1450 m.a.s.l. Gentle north facing slopes with a gradient of 0°–9° occur in the area. This community is located in the Fa7 land type, characterised by well- drained shallow sandy loam to sandy clay loamsoils on hard rock (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 0% and 5%. One sample plot is located on a rocky outcrop and comprises 20% tree cover. Shrubs cover between 2% and 10% of this community, grasses between 50% and 90%, and forbs between 10% and 20%. Rocks cover between 5% and 10%. Evidence of previous crop planting, regular fires, and animal activity (moderate to high grazing and trampling) is prevalent in this community. Local people from the surrounding community harvest thatch grass. There are no signs of soil erosion. Species from species group E (Table 1) are characteristic for this community and are represented by 15 sample plots with an average of 30 different plant species recorded per plot. The anthropogenic grass Hyparrhenia hirta (species group Q) dominates this community. Other prominent grass species include Sporobolus africanus (species group A), Cynodon dactylon, Eragrostis curvula, Aristida congesta 84 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 7. subspecies congesta (species group E), Brachiaria brizantha (species group J), Schizachyrium sanguineum (species group Q), and Melinis nerviglumis (species group R). This community has a total tree density of 256 ind/ha. Trees occur as small clumps on rocky outcrops not previ- ously ploughed. Tree species include Ziziphus mucronata (species group K) with 20 ind/ha in the upper height class and 7 ind/ha in the lower height class, and Searsia leptodictya (species group D) with 13 ind/ha in the upper height class and 0 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.4. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor open woodland This community is located on the northeastern, central, southern, and southeastern sections of the study area, covering approximately 393 ha (8.8%) (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1217 to 1391 m.a.s.l. Slopes range from gentle north, northwest, and southeast facing midslopes (4°–9°) to moderately steep slopes (10°–15°). Predominant land types for this community are Fa7, Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. These land types are characterised by loam, sandy loam, and sandy clay loam soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 30% and 70%, shrubs between 10% and 50%, grasses between 10% and 60%, and forbs between 10% and 60%. Rocks cover between 30% and 50% and occur as prominent rocky outcrops. Soil erosion is minimal; however, mild localised sheet erosion is visible on disturbed rocky areas, along animal paths, and at destroyed termitariums. Signs of frequent fires are prevalent through- out the area, with evidence of dead Dichrostachys cinerea trees. Species from species group F (Table 1) are characteristic for this plant community. Vegetation in this community is characterised by the domi- nance of the tree Lannea discolor (species group F) and the grass Setaria sphacelata (species group R). Other locally prominent species include the woody Englerophytum magalismontanum, Combretum molle, Burkea africana, Combretum apiculatum (species group F); the grass Andropogon chinensis (species group F); and the forb Phymaspermum acerosum (species group F). This community is divided into two sub-communities: 4.2.4.1. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Englerophytum magalismon- tanum sub-community. This sub-community is located on the south- western section of the study area and covers approximately 148 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1329 to 1391 m.a.s.l. and comprises gentle to steep southeast and northwest facing slopes of 4°–25°. Steeper rocky slopes in this sub-community are inaccessible to animals. Soils range from sandy loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species group G (Table 1). Ten sample plots were surveyed with an average of 35 different plant species recorded per plot. This sub-community is dominated by the trees Lannea discolor, Englerophytum magalismon- tanum (species group F), and the grasses Loudetia simplex (species group Q) and Setaria sphacelata (species group R). This sub- community has a total tree density of 1130 ind/ha with Lannea discolor having 90 ind/ha in the upper height class and 70 ind/ha in the medium height class, Englerophytum magalismontanum has 40 ind/ha in the upper height class, 40 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 10 ind/ha in the lower height class. The locally prominent tree Diplorhynchus condylocarpon is represented by 70 ind/ha in the upper height class and 80 ind/ha in the medium height class (Table 2). 4.2.4.2. Setaria sphacelata–Lannea discolor–Senegalia burkei sub- community. This sub-community is located on the northeastern and southern parts of the study area and is nearly twice the size of sub- community 4.1, covering approximately 245 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1217 to 1357 m.a.s.l. This sub-community is characterised by gen- tle north, northwest, and southeast facing midslopes with a gradient of 4°–9°. The midslopes are accessible to animals, while steep slopes with gradients of 16°–25° provide limited animal access. Soils range from loam to sandy loam. The area is covered with loose rocks between 10 and 50 cm in diameter. Plant species from species group H (Table 1) are characteristic for this sub-community. Twelve sample plots represent this sub- community with an average of 39 plant species recorded per plot. This sub-community has a total tree density of 1340 ind/ha. Vegetation is dominated by the trees Senegalia burkei with 92 ind/ha in the upper height class, 58 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 75 ind/ha in the lower height class (species group D), Lannea discolor with 75 ind/ha in the upper height class, 50 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 75 ind/ha in the lower height class (species group F) (Tables 1 and 2). The grass layer is dominated by the grasses Setaria sphacelata and Themeda triandra (species group R). 4.2.5. Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri–Rhoicissus tridentata rocky shrubland This plant community occurs as open shrub habitats on the south- eastern side of the study area; patches on the northern, eastern, central, and southeastern borders of the study area and on the southwestern sections of the study area (Fig. 3). It covers approximately 141 ha (3.7%) and occurs at an altitude ranging between 1325 and 1430 m.a.s.l. This shrubland comprises gentle (4°–9°) to moderately steep (10°–15°) south and southwest facing midslopes. Predominant land types in this community include Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. Soils vary from fine sandy loam and sandy loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 30% and 60%, shrub cover between 10% and 40%, grass cover between 10% and 50%, and forb cover between 10% and 40%. Rock cover ranges from 20% to 45%. Mini- mal signs of soil erosion were observed. There are indications of animal activity in the form of moderate grazing, game paths, and trampling. Evidence of previous fires is prevalent throughout the area. Characteristic plant species for this community are from species group I (Table 1). A total of 18 sample plots represent this community with an average of 41 different plant species recorded per plot. This com- munity has a total tree density of 828 ind/ha. The vegetation of this com- munity is characterised by the prominent sprawling shrub Rhoicissus tridentata (species group B), the dwarf shrub Pygmaeothamnus zeyheri (species group I), and the grasses Setaria sphacelata (species group R) and Loudetia simplex (species group Q). Rhoicissus tridentata (species group B) has 11 ind/ha in the medium height class and 28 ind/ha in the lower height class. Additional prominent woody species include Cro- ton gratissimus with 28 ind/ha in the upper height class and 11 ind/ha in the medium height class, and Combretum molle with 22 ind/ha in the upper height class, 11 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 6 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.6. Tristachya leucothrix–Faurea saligna open woodland This community occurs on the northern section of the study area, covering approximately 708 ha (15.9%) of the study area (Fig. 3). Alti- tude ranges from 1251 to 1441 m.a.s.l. Slopes range from flat (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) on south facing midslopes. Land types associated with this plant community include Fa7 and Ib10. This woodland is characterised by fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam soils (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 25% and 45%, shrub cover between 10% and 40%, grass cover between 30% and 70%, and forbs between 10% and 50%. Rocks cover between 10% and 40% of this com- munity. Soil erosion is minimal due to a well-developed herbaceous layer. Evidence of frequent fires is prevalent in the form of dying stands of Dichrostachys cinerea trees. Mild to moderate trampling is present and there is evidence of digging by small mammals. Species from species group K (Table 1) are characteristic for this community. A total of 19 sample plots were surveyed with an average of 40 different plant species recorded per plot. Vegetation in this com- munity is characterised by the dominance of the tree Faurea saligna (species group K), and by the grasses Tristachya leucothrix and Brachiaria serrata (species group Q). The grasses Trachypogon spicatus, Panicum natalense (species group P), and Loudetia simplex (species group 85S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 8. Q) codominate. Other locally prominent species include Dichrostachys cinerea, Ozoroa paniculosa, Lippia javanica (species group K), and Protea caffra (species group O). This community has a total tree density of 902 ind/ha. Faurea saligna has 42 ind/ha in the upper height class, 53 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 279 ind/ha in the lower height class. Dichrostachys cinerea has 21 ind/ha in the upper height class, 58 ind/ha in the medium height class, 79 ind/ha in the lower height class, and Protea caffra has 47 ind/ha in the upper height class, 5 ind/ha in the medium height class, and 5 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.7. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex open grassland This is the largest community in the study area and covers approxi- mately 2379 ha (53.4%). It occurs on the central and southern sections of the study area (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1318 to 1455 m.a.s.l. Slopes vary from flat plateau/crests (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) and steep (16°–25°) south, north, and east facing slopes. Prevalent land types include Fa7, Ib10, Ib13, and Ib17. Soils range from fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). Estimated tree cover varies between 5% and 40%, shrubs between 5% and 30%, grasses between 30% and 80%, and forbs between 5% and 40%. Rock cover ranges from 5% to 40%, with loose rocks prominent on slopes. There is evidence of recent fire damage that destroyed several Protea caffra trees in sub-community 7.3. Signs of animal activity include low to moderate grazing and trampling in recently burnt areas, digging, and animal droppings. Species belonging to species group L are characteristic for this com- munity (Table 1). Vegetation in this community is dominated by the grasses Loudetia simplex (species group Q) and Bewsia biflora (species group R), while Themeda triandra (species group R) and Urelytrum agropyroides (species group P) are prominent throughout the commu- nity. The woody layer is not well developed with small scattered clumps of locally prominent Protea caffra (species group O) trees. This grassland community is divided into three sub-communities: 4.2.7.1. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Tristachya biseriata sub-community. This sub-community is located on the southern and southwestern borders of the study area and covers approximately 202 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1318 to 1466 m.a.s.l. Slopes range from flat (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) south facing midslopes. The area is accessible to animals and there is evidence of grazing in recently burnt areas, trampling, and digging. Soils are shallow fine sandy to sandy clay loam. The grass layer is well developed, and minimal soil erosion is present. This sub-community has no characteristic species group and is characterised by the absence of species from species groups O and P (Table 1). A total of 11 sample plots represent the sub-community, with an average of 34 different plant species per plot. This sub- community has a total tree density of 153 ind/ha. The vegetation is dominated by the grasses Loudetia simplex, Tristachya biseriata (species group Q), Themeda triandra, and Bewsia biflora (species group R). Prom- inent species include the grasses Brachiaria serrata (species group Q) and Eragrostis racemosa (species group R), and the woody species Protea caffra with 18 ind/ha in the upper height class, and 27 ind/ha in the lower height class, Faurea saligna with 0 ind/ha in the upper, 0 ind/ha in the medium and 36 ind/ha in the lower height classes, and Tapiphyllum parvifolium with 9 ind/ha in the medium height class and 18 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.7.2. Elionurus muticu–Loudetia simplex–Aristida diffusa sub- community. This sub-community is located in the south and northeast- ern section of the study area and covers approximately 926 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1316 to 1440 m.a.s.l. Slopes vary from flat plateau/crests (0°–3°) to gentle (4°–9°) north facing midslopes and steep south facing slopes (16°–25°). Flat and gentle areas are accessible to wildlife and evidence of animal activity includes grazing, trampling, digging, and fresh animal droppings. Soil varies from fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam, with minimal evidence of soil erosion (Land Type Survey Staff, 1988). This sub-community is characterised by species found in species group M (Table 1). A total of 22 sample plots represent this sub- community with an average of 36 different plant species per plot. This sub-community has a total tree density of 217 ind/ha. The vegetation is dominated by the grass Loudetia simplex (species group Q), with the grasses Themeda triandra, Eragrostis racemosa (species group R), Tristachya biseriata, Brachiaria serrata (species group Q), and Aristida diffusa (species group M) being locally prominent. Prominent woody species include Strychnos cocculoides with 5 ind/ha in the lower, medi- um, and upper height classes; Lopholaena coriifolia with 14 ind/ha in the medium and lower height classes; Protea caffra with 3 ind/ha in the upper height class; and Mundulea sericea with 5 ind/ha in the medium height class and 14 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). 4.2.7.3. Elionurus muticus–Loudetia simplex–Gladiolus elliottii sub- community. This sub-community is located centrally in the study area and covers approximately 1251 ha (Fig. 3). Altitude ranges from 1370 to 1455 m.a.s.l. Slopes vary from flat plateaus with a gradient of 0°–3° to gentle midslopes of 4°–9° that are accessible to wildlife. There is evidence of moderate grazing and trampling throughout the sub- community. Soil consists of fine sandy loam to sandy clay loam with very little evidence of erosion. Characteristic species for this sub-community are from species group N (Table 1). A total of 39 sample plots were surveyed for this sub-community with an average of 36 different plant species recorded per plot. This sub-community has a total tree density of 121 ind/ha. The vegetation of this sub-community is dominated by the grasses Bewsia biflora and Eragrostis racemosa (species group R). Loudetia simplex, Schizachyrium sanguineum, Digitaria monodactyla (species group Q), and Hyparrhenia hirta (species group R) codominate. The prominent woody species in this sub-community is Protea caffra with 46 ind/ha in the upper height class and 3 ind/ha in the lower height class (Table 2). Table 3 Species richness, frequency distribution, deviation, and evenness for the Nooitgedacht plant communities. Community N Species richness/observed Expected frequency Percentage deviation Standardised residuals Sum of all n/N * In(n/N) H Evenness (E) 1 109 14 13.32 2.79 0.1 −2.541 2.541 0.963 2.1 112 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −2.685 2.685 0.896 2.2 186 18 13.32 32.16 1.19 −2.187 2.187 0.757 3 204 21 13.32 54.19 2 −2.499 2.499 0.821 4.1 96 11 13.32 −19.24 −0.71 −2.098 2.098 0.875 4.2 42 7 13.32 −48.6 −1.79 −1.052 1.052 0.541 5 200 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −4.286 4.286 1.431 6 287 20 13.32 46.84 1.73 −4.955 4.955 1.654 7.2 155 12 13.32 −11.89 −0.44 −2.769 2.769 1.114 7.3 167 14 13.32 2.79 0.1 −2.357 2.357 0.893 86 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 9. 4.3. Species richness The numbers of different plant species present in the Nooitgedacht plant communities are depicted in Table 3 (based on data in Table 1). 4.4. Species diversity Results from the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index analysis are presented in Table 3. 5. Discussion In this study, 11 plant communities were identified within four structural vegetation units: grasslands, shrublands, woodlands, and wetlands/riverine areas. Grasslands are the dominant vegetation in the study area, covering 2631 ha (59%). Woodland vegetation covers 1101 ha (25%), wetlands/riverine vegetation covers 584 ha (13%), and shrublands covers 141 ha (3%). Nooitgedacht is a very diverse area and comprises 649 species (64% of the reserve's 1016 taxa). One hundred and ninety-four new species that are not listed for the reserve occur in the area. Nooitgedacht is representative of a distributed mosaic grassland and woodland habitat, referred to as Bankenveld and described as a ‘False Grass’ veld type (Acocks, 1988; Brown and Bredenkamp, 2003). The cli- max stage of this veld type should be open Savanna (Acocks, 1988); however, it has been modified and maintained by regular fires and grazed as a grassland (Bredenkamp et al., 2006). Bankenveld is characterised by a complex topography that comprises rocky hills, ridges, plateaux, valleys, and plains, which are typical of the study area. Bankenveld areas are also characterised by the presence of rocks on the soil surface (Brown and Bredenkamp, 2003). Grassland communities within the study area that have an affinity to Bankenveld vegetation types, as described by Brown and Bredenkamp (2003), include plant community 3 that is similar to the Hyparrhenia hirta anthropogenic grassland (Bankenveld vegetation type 1), and plant community 7 that is similar to the Monocymbium ceresiiforme– Loudetia simplex grassland (Bankenveld vegetation type 7). Woodland community 2 is similar to the Themeda triandra–Vachellia karroo microphyllous woodland (Bankenveld bushveld vegetation type 11), woodland community 4 is similar to Ochna pulchra–Englerophytum magalismontanum warm temperate mountain bushveld (Bankenveld bushveld vegetation type 10), and woodland community 6 is similar to Tristachya biseriata–Protea caffra cool temperate mountain bushveld (Bankenveld bushveld vegetation types 9) (Brown and Bredenkamp, 2003). Plant communities 1 and 2 (Sporobolus africanus–Buddleja salviifolia wetland and Panicum maximum–Senegalia caffra riverine woodland) are ecologically sensitive ecosystems. Wetlands and riverine habitats in the study area are important due to the multitude of ecosystem services they provide, including flood attenuation, water storage and channel- ling, provision of suitable habitat for a variety of plants and animals, and provision of water to surrounding ecosystems during drought (Brand, et al., 2011). Although moderate levels of soil erosion were ob- served, it is important that the reserve management monitor and man- age this erosion to prevent future problems, especially during times of drought when animals concentrate in moist areas, overgrazing and trampling the vegetation. Woody plant density totals for Nooitgedacht are below the accepted threshold of 1800 ind/ha for mixed bushveld (Brown, 1997). It is impor- tant that this density threshold is not exceeded, as this will result in the rapid loss of veld condition. It is recommended that regular monitoring be undertaken to ensure woody species densities remain below 1800 ind/ha, and that should numbers increase above this, appropriate management action be taken. Sub-communities 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, and 4.2 have the highest woody densities (Table 2), and are typical of bushveld vegetation. Height of woody species is normally distributed for sub- community 2.2 and community 4, with the majority of woody species in the medium height class. Sub-community 2.1 has the largest number of species within the upper height class. Plant communities with the highest densities of woody species (in excess of 1000 ind/ha) include sub-communities 2.1, 2.2, 4.1, and 4.2. Plant communities 1, 5, and 6 have woody species densities that range between 600 and 900 ind/ha. The lowest woody species densities recorded for study area are for plant community 3 and sub-communities 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 (grassland communities) (Table 2). None of the communities in the study area have woody species densities that have a negative influence on veld condition. No woody species dominates the vegetation in the study area and there is no bush densification or encroachment. The majority of woody species found in grassland communities at the study site have an aggregated spatial distribution. Woody species in woodland communities are more evenly distributed. Woody species in the lower height classes occur close to their ‘mother’ plants. Overall woody species densities for the study area are normal and indicate that the area is well managed. There are no indications of bush en- croachment and the habitat is suitable for browsers and herbivores that prefer longer grasses for grazing and hiding their young. For Nooitgedacht, average species diversity per sample plot is 35. Plant communities 5 and 6 and sub-community 2.1 have the highest species diversity (n = 20), followed by sub-community 2.2 (n = 18). Species diversity for plant community 1 and sub-community 7.3 are the same (n = 14) (Table 3). There was a significant association be- tween species richness values and communities surveyed x2 (13) = 3.154, P b 0.001. Based on standardised residuals, plant communities 5 and 6 and sub-community 2.1 are over represented (+1.7), and the main contributors to the association. The association between the Shannon–Wiener Diversity Index value (H) for the surveyed plant communities was not significant x2 (13) = 0.000, P = 1.000. Plant com- munity 5 had an H value of 4.286, and plant community 6 had an H value of 4.955. These results indicate increased diversity for communities 5 and 6. Plant community 6 (E 1.654) has the most even distribution of species followed by plant community 5 (E 1.431) and sub-community 7.2 (E 1.114) (Table 3). From the 11 identified plant communities in the study area, four plant communities (3, 6 and sub-communities 2.2 and 4.1) were previ- ously described by different researchers (Theron, 1973; Bezuidenhout et al., 1994; Cilliers et al., 1999; Filmalter, 2010). Seven plant communi- ties (1, 5 and sub-communities 2.1, 4.2, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) are considered new plant communities and have not previously been described for the reserve. Plant communities 2 and 5 and sub-community 4.2 have affinities with each other due to the presence of common species from species group B. The grass Panicum maximum, characteristic of woody habitats (Van Oudtshoorn, 2012), and the tree Ziziphus mucronata are prominent in these plant communities. Sub-communities 2.2 and 4.2 have a strong relationship in terms of their woody component, with the tree Senegalia burkei (species group D) being prominent in both sub-communities, however, sub-community 2.2 is wetter than 4.2. The different land types present in the area are associated with the different plant communities. The open grassland areas are mostly associated with the Fa land type, while the woodland and wetland areas are associated with the Ib land type. 6. Conclusion Prior to this research, limited information existed for the flora of the Nooitgedacht section of the LDNR. This study provides valuable infor- mation on the plant communities occurring in the study area, indicating affinities in vegetation structure and composition with typical sourish mixed bushveld and Bankenveld. Similarities are evident in open grass- lands with scattered trees, and semi-open woodlands on hillsides. The recently acquired Nooitgedacht section provides both new habitats and increases the size of existing habitats for browsers, grazers, 87S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88
  • 10. and mixed feeders. This area is suitable for the endangered Sable antelope (Hippotragus niger) and the reserve's priority species, Oribi (Ourebia ourebia). Currently, the reserve maintains a stocking rate of 11–12 ha/AU, which includes Nooitgedacht. All fences between the new area and the main reserve have been removed. We recommend that the current fire regime for the reserve be applied to the new area to ensure moribund plant material is removed on a regular basis, and to create a mosaic of habitats. We further recommend the adoption of a patch mosaic burning approach for the area, as this creates ideal habitat for Oribi. The critically endangered and specially protected plant Encephalartos middelburgensis (Mpumalanga Province, 2005) and a rare plant Harworthia koelmaniorum var. mcmurtryi (Biko'o et al., 2011) occur within the study area. It is important that these species and their habitats are protected to ensure their survival and to increase their population sizes. We recommend that these species and their habi- tats be monitored on a regular basis to prevent loss of habitat. Four communities (3 and 6, and sub-communities 2.2 and 4.1) of the 11 identified plant communities for the study area have previously been described for the reserve by Theron (1973). Seven are new plant com- munities (1 and 5, and sub-communities 2.1, 4.2, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3) not previously identified or described. The addition of new plant communi- ties provides new habitats, new opportunities, and new resources for existing and potentially new animal species. The increase in sizes of existing plant communities enlarges the size of the habitats these pro- vide, increasing resources and allowing for an increase in the sizes of existing animal populations. Successful application of the popular Braun–Blanquet classification system resulted in the achievement of our objectives for this study. We identified and described the floristic composition of the various plant communities at Nooitgedacht, classified the plant communities based on species dominance, and mapped the plant communities. An association between land types and plant communities for the study area has been observed, indicating the importance of using land types in plant community delineation. Our results indicate that the vegetation for the Nooitgedacht section is well managed and in a natural state with minimal degradation. The findings generated by this study could be used to supplement existing management objectives for the reserve. Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.02.199. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the staff and management of MTPA, particu- larly the staff at LDNR, for making this research possible. References Acocks, J.P.H., 1988. Veld Types of South Africa. Botanic Research Institute, South Africa. Bezuidenhout, H., 1993. Syntaxonomy and Synecology of Western Transvaal Grasslands, South Africa Ph.D. Thesis. University of Pretoria. Bezuidenhout, H., Bredenkamp, G.J., Theron, G.K., 1994. The syntaxonomy of the vegeta- tion of the Fb land type in the western Transvaal Grassland, South Africa. South African Journal of Botany 60, 72–81. Biko'o, A.A., Du Plessis, G.D.C., Myburgh, W.J., 2011. Population size, structure and habitat features of Haworthia koelmaniorum var. mcmurtryi, an endemic plant from Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Koedoe 53, 31–40. Brand, R.F., Brown, L.R., Du Preez, P.J., 2011. The Grassland vegetation of Platberg, Eastern Free State. South Africa. koedoe 53, 66–78. Bredenkamp, G., Theron, G., 1978. A synecological account of the Suikerbosrand Nature Reserve 1. The phytosociology of the Witwatersrand geological system. Bothalia 12, 513–529. Bredenkamp, G.J., Brown, L.R., Pfab, M.F., 2006. Conservation value of the Egoli Granite Grassland, an endemic grassland in Gauteng, South Africa. Koedoe 49, 59–66. Brown, L.R., 1997. A Plant Ecological Study and Wildlife Management Plan for Borakalalo Nature Reserve, North-West Province Ph.D. Dissertation University of Pretoria, Pretoria. Brown, L.R., Bredenkamp, G., 1994. The phytosociology of the southern section of Borakalalo Nature Reserve, South Africa. Koedoe 37, 59–72. Brown, L.R., Bredenkamp, G.J., 2003. A reappraisal of Acocks Bankenveld: origin and diversity of vegetation types. South African Journal of Botany 69, 7–26. Brown, L.R., Du Preez, P.J., Bezuidenhout, H., Bredenkamp, G.J., Mostert, T.H.C., Collins, N.B., 2013. Guidelines for phytosociological classifications and descriptions of vegeta- tion in southern Africa. Koedoe 55, 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v55i1. 1103. Cilliers, S.S., Van Wyk, E., Bredenkamp, G., 1999. Urban nature conservation: vegetation of natural areas in the Potchefstroom municipal area, North-West Province, South Africa. Koedoe 42, 1–30. Coetzee, B.J., 1975. A phytosociological classification of the vegetation of the Rustenburg Nature Reserve. Bothalia 11, 561–580. Edwards, D., 1983. A broad-scale structural classification of vegetation for practical purposes. Bothalia 14, 705–712. Eksteen, J.J., 2003. Condensed Management Plan for Loskop Dam Nature Reserve—1st Draft. Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, Nelspruit. ESRI, 2014. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2.1. Ferrar, A.A., Lötter, M.C., 2007. Mpumalanga Biodiversity Conservation Plan Handbook. Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency, Nelspruit. Filmalter, N., 2010. A Vegetation Classification and Management Plan for the Hondekraal Section of the Loskop Dam Nature Reserve M.Sc. Dissertation. University of South Africa. Fitzpatrick, R.W., Hahne, H.C.H., Kirsten, W.F.A., Hawker, L.C., 1986. Soil mineralogy. In: du Plessis, H.M. (Ed.), Land Types of the 2526 Rustenburg, 2528 Pretoria. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa (Pretoria). Götze, A.R., Meyer, S.S., Cilliers, S.S., Kellner, K., 1998. The Classification of Plant Commu- nities and Range Condition Assessment of Two New Parts of Loskop Dam Nature Reserve, Mpumalanga. Unpublished report, Potchefstroom University. Hennekens, S.M., 1996. TURBOVEG: A Software Package for Input, Processing and Presentation of Phytosociological Data. Users' Guide, Version July 1996, IBN-DLO. Wageningen and Lancaster University, Lancaster. Hill, M.O., 1979. TWINSPAN: a Fortran program for arranging multivariate data in an or- dered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Ecology And Systematics, Cornel University, Ithaca. Land Type Survey Staff, 1988. Land Types of the Maps 2526 Rustenburg and 2528 Pretoria. Mpumalanga Province, 2005. Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency Act of 2005 (Nelspruit). Mucina, L., Rutherford, M.C., 2006. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, Strelitzia (doi:10.1007/s). Mueller-Dombois, D., Ellenberg, H., 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. Wiley, New York. Rolecěk, J., Tichỳ, L., Zelenỳ, D., Chytrỳ, M., 2009. Modified TWINSPAN classification in which the hierarchy respects cluster heterogeneity. Journal of Vegetation Science 20, 596–602. Rouget, M., Reyers, B., Jonas, Z., Desmet, P., Driver, A., Maze, K., Egoh, B., Cowling, R.M., Mucina, L., Rutherford, M., 2004. South African National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment Technical Report. Volume 1: Terrestrial Component. Pretoria. Shannon, C.E., Wiener, W., 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Illinois University Press, Urbana. Theron, G., 1973. N’ Ekologiese Studie Van Die plantegroei Van Die Loskopdam Natuurreservaat D. Sc. Thesis. University of Pretoria. Tichy, L., 2002. JUICE, software for vegetation classification. Journal of Vegetation Science 13, 451–453. Van der Maarel, E., 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetation 39, 97–114. Van Oudtshoorn, F., 2012. Guide to Grasses of Southern Africa. Briza Publications, Pretoria. Weger, M.J.A., 1974. On concepts and techniques applied in the Zürich-Montpellier method of vegetation survey. Bothalia 11, 309–323. Westfall, R.H., 1981. The Plant Ecology of the Farm Groothoek, Thabazimbi District M.Sc. Dissertation University of Pretoria. 88 S.E. Nkosi et al. / South African Journal of Botany 105 (2016) 79–88