SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Download to read offline
12 | UNMANNED SYSTEMS | JUNE 2015
In recent months, enthusiasm from the
U.S. Navy toward the future of un-
manned systems has been palpable,
and it seeks to move toward full robotic
system autonomy working in collabora-
tion with manned teams.
	 “We need to get aggressive about
the future of robotics and autonomy,”
said Brig. Gen. Kevin Killea at the Navy
League’s annual Sea-Air-Space Exhibi-
tion in April. “I believe that this begins
with success in the areas of advanced
perception, multilevel cognitive reason-
ing and the resulting advancements that
come with autonomous behaviors in
those two areas.”
	 Killea, who is the vice chief of naval
research and the commanding general
of the Marine Corp Warfighting Lab,
stressed the importance for unmanned
systems to be able to autonomously
make decisions and react to the envi-
ronment to reduce the load carried
by warfighters.
	 “We can move away from man in the
loop to supervised autonomy so that
we can reduce the physical and cogni-
tive loads of the Marines that these
systems are going to be teamed with,”
said Killea.
	 Brig. Gen. Karsten Heckl echoed
Killea’s sentiments, focusing on the
2015
Autonomous
Systems to Become
New Normal for Navy
By Scott Kesselman
Sea Air Space
JUNE 2015 | UNMANNED SYSTEMS | 13
Photo:NorthropGrummanCorp.
potential of unmanned aircraft systems
to assist troops.
	 “I don’t know why we limit how we
think about unmanned,” said Heckl. “Air-
borne early warning, medevac — think
about that. The solutions are limitless.”
	 For the Navy, Heckl stressed the
importance of shipboard-compatible
solutions. Tier five medium- and high-
altitude, long-endurance systems, such
as the MQ-9 Reaper, don’t currently
meet that requirement.
	 “We’re clearly all in with group three,
the small tactical UAS. … I think that
with technology, with industry assis-
tance, I would say that the horizons are
long and wide,” said Heckl.
	 He also expressed interest in
DARPA’s Tactically Exploited Recon-
naissance Node program to fulfill this
need, which recently moved into phase
two, with DARPA awarding contracts
to AeroVironment Inc. and Northrop
Grumman Corp. TERN seeks to give
small ships the ability to launch and re-
cover medium-altitude, long-endurance
unmanned aircraft systems.
	 For air, the enthusiasm was some-
what dampened by Rear Adm. Mark
Butt, who is in charge of procurement,
development and sustainment of capa-
bilities across all domains for the U.S.
Coast Guard.
	 “The Coast Guard is not all into UAS
yet,” he said.
	 He went on to explain that the Federal
Aviation Administration’s certificate of
authorization process for public, domes-
tic UAS to gain access to the airspace
and extreme weather scenarios limits
the usefulness of UAS in rapid response
scenarios for the Coast Guard.
	 In order to circumvent similar issues
with unmanned underwater vehicles
and unmanned surface vessels, Butt
explained potential solutions to avoiding
rules established in reaction to events
and promoting innovation in robotic
maritime applications.
	 “I suggest industry take the lead
in developing regulations for those
mission spaces, because if there’s an
event that causes a reaction, it’s going
to drive the cost.”
	 Involvement from industry and other
partners is another key component.
	 “Unmanned capabilities being ex-
plored by other government agencies,
academia and industry are crucial to
informing and shaping future Marine
Corps requirements and capability
development,” said Killea.
	 “For the true revolution in military
affairs to happen here, I think that
remotely piloted, man-in-the-loop sys-
tems will quickly become a thing of the
past,” Killea continued. “By achieving
true autonomy, we will be able to ex-
ploit the benefits of swarming systems,
effective persistent counter unmanned
systems as well as with unmanned
casevac and medevac.”
	 There are results in these areas
right now. In April, the Office of Naval
Research released a video of a recent
demonstration of autonomous swarming
UAS. Multiple UAS were launched from
a tube and flew in formation as part of
the Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Swarming Technology program.
	 In April, the Navy also successfully
completed aerial refueling of the un-
manned X-47B.
	 “Think of the complexity of that,” said
U.S. Navy Program Executive Officer for
Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons
Mark Darrah. “The idea that we go to
the right place in space, then we would
rendezvous with the tanker, feel the seat
of the basket, get the system ready to
receive fuel, get to precontact, enter the
basket, push the hose in, and release
the one-way check valve to release the
fuel and then exit safely. That’s a very
complicated proposition.”
	 Not as complicated as what is in store
further down the road. Killea, Darrah
and ONR Director Matt Winter all looked
toward alternative technologies com-
ing out of synthetic biology and neural
networks science to achieve advanced
autonomous functionality and coopera-
tion across unmanned assets.
	 “Networked cooperative systems
will need to have the ability to au-
tonomously coordinate their actions in
response to the dynamic events of a
conflict,” said Killea. “The key here is
how those systems will communicate.
This will be an area of great develop-
ment in autonomous systems mov-
ing forward. For swarming to work, I
don’t think we can be dependent on
the RF [radio frequency] spectrum. So
we’ll need a way for them to passively
communicate or potentially a method
of sensing between the systems. They
have a change in their environment,
and they understand without having to
directly communicate what their next
steps or actions will be. That’s kind of
like how termites work.”
	 Although the officers were unsure how
exactly this would be accomplished,
they described a scenario where when
one robotic asset senses a change in the
environment, it would drop some sort
of flag to let other assets know that the
environment and therefore future mission
directives have changed.
	 “I agree with [Killea]. We cannot rely
on RF. I want to know why the albatross
is able to fly 3,000 miles and go back to
its nest and get that navigation into an
unmanned system,” says Darrah.
	 The robots would be designed to
make their own informed decisions;
however, would still be under the purview
of human oversight for serious decisions.
	 “Humans must be kept in the loop,
particularly in regard to use of force …
and with actions that could lead to es-
calations of crisis,” said Killea. “Human-
machine teaming will be the approach.”
The X-47B unmanned aircraft lines up with a tanker
during a successful aerial refueling demonstration in April.
Scan this QR code with your smart device to see a video of the LOCUST flying formation.
SHOW SCAN

More Related Content

Similar to Sea Air Space 06_15UnmannedSystems_web

NEJ December 2016
NEJ December 2016NEJ December 2016
NEJ December 2016James Case
 
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2DroneSec
 
Ncw Suav Presentation
Ncw Suav PresentationNcw Suav Presentation
Ncw Suav Presentationpmatsang
 
Cnmoc june 21 clippings
Cnmoc june 21 clippingsCnmoc june 21 clippings
Cnmoc june 21 clippingsdyannafrye
 
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer Vision
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer VisionA Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer Vision
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer VisionDR.P.S.JAGADEESH KUMAR
 
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine Drone
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine DroneIRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine Drone
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine DroneIRJET Journal
 
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]Graham Gabb, FCCA, MBA, FRAeS
 
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSS
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSSLegal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSS
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSSHelen Tung
 
japcc_journal_Edition_3
japcc_journal_Edition_3japcc_journal_Edition_3
japcc_journal_Edition_3Ido Pickel
 
2013 NART Group Paper
2013 NART Group Paper2013 NART Group Paper
2013 NART Group PaperFaye Clawson
 
ES35_Kepron_Jared_Poster
ES35_Kepron_Jared_PosterES35_Kepron_Jared_Poster
ES35_Kepron_Jared_PosterJared Kepron
 
Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals
 Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals
Unmanned Aircraft System FundamentalsJim Jenkins
 
SilsuitG2TechECSafe
SilsuitG2TechECSafeSilsuitG2TechECSafe
SilsuitG2TechECSafeEthan Chew
 

Similar to Sea Air Space 06_15UnmannedSystems_web (20)

Proceedings Article
Proceedings ArticleProceedings Article
Proceedings Article
 
NEJ December 2016
NEJ December 2016NEJ December 2016
NEJ December 2016
 
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2
UAV Threats to the Oil and Gas Industry (David Kovar) - DroneSec GDSN#2
 
Radar_E_Magazine
Radar_E_MagazineRadar_E_Magazine
Radar_E_Magazine
 
Remotesensing 04-01671
Remotesensing 04-01671Remotesensing 04-01671
Remotesensing 04-01671
 
Ncw Suav Presentation
Ncw Suav PresentationNcw Suav Presentation
Ncw Suav Presentation
 
Cnmoc june 21 clippings
Cnmoc june 21 clippingsCnmoc june 21 clippings
Cnmoc june 21 clippings
 
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer Vision
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer VisionA Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer Vision
A Novel Robotic Regulation for Inundated Marine Based on Computer Vision
 
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine Drone
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine DroneIRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine Drone
IRJET- Four Propellers Architecture Proposed for the Submarine Drone
 
2013_UTS_Fall_web
2013_UTS_Fall_web2013_UTS_Fall_web
2013_UTS_Fall_web
 
Autonomous shipping
Autonomous shippingAutonomous shipping
Autonomous shipping
 
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]
Roadmap for technology and product development of airship by ml sidana et al[1]
 
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSS
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSSLegal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSS
Legal perspective on unmanned maritime vessels and GNSS
 
japcc_journal_Edition_3
japcc_journal_Edition_3japcc_journal_Edition_3
japcc_journal_Edition_3
 
digital_heritage
digital_heritagedigital_heritage
digital_heritage
 
2013 NART Group Paper
2013 NART Group Paper2013 NART Group Paper
2013 NART Group Paper
 
ES35_Kepron_Jared_Poster
ES35_Kepron_Jared_PosterES35_Kepron_Jared_Poster
ES35_Kepron_Jared_Poster
 
Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals
 Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals
Unmanned Aircraft System Fundamentals
 
UAV System for MOB SAR - Copy
UAV System for MOB SAR - CopyUAV System for MOB SAR - Copy
UAV System for MOB SAR - Copy
 
SilsuitG2TechECSafe
SilsuitG2TechECSafeSilsuitG2TechECSafe
SilsuitG2TechECSafe
 

Sea Air Space 06_15UnmannedSystems_web

  • 1. 12 | UNMANNED SYSTEMS | JUNE 2015 In recent months, enthusiasm from the U.S. Navy toward the future of un- manned systems has been palpable, and it seeks to move toward full robotic system autonomy working in collabora- tion with manned teams. “We need to get aggressive about the future of robotics and autonomy,” said Brig. Gen. Kevin Killea at the Navy League’s annual Sea-Air-Space Exhibi- tion in April. “I believe that this begins with success in the areas of advanced perception, multilevel cognitive reason- ing and the resulting advancements that come with autonomous behaviors in those two areas.” Killea, who is the vice chief of naval research and the commanding general of the Marine Corp Warfighting Lab, stressed the importance for unmanned systems to be able to autonomously make decisions and react to the envi- ronment to reduce the load carried by warfighters. “We can move away from man in the loop to supervised autonomy so that we can reduce the physical and cogni- tive loads of the Marines that these systems are going to be teamed with,” said Killea. Brig. Gen. Karsten Heckl echoed Killea’s sentiments, focusing on the 2015 Autonomous Systems to Become New Normal for Navy By Scott Kesselman Sea Air Space
  • 2. JUNE 2015 | UNMANNED SYSTEMS | 13 Photo:NorthropGrummanCorp. potential of unmanned aircraft systems to assist troops. “I don’t know why we limit how we think about unmanned,” said Heckl. “Air- borne early warning, medevac — think about that. The solutions are limitless.” For the Navy, Heckl stressed the importance of shipboard-compatible solutions. Tier five medium- and high- altitude, long-endurance systems, such as the MQ-9 Reaper, don’t currently meet that requirement. “We’re clearly all in with group three, the small tactical UAS. … I think that with technology, with industry assis- tance, I would say that the horizons are long and wide,” said Heckl. He also expressed interest in DARPA’s Tactically Exploited Recon- naissance Node program to fulfill this need, which recently moved into phase two, with DARPA awarding contracts to AeroVironment Inc. and Northrop Grumman Corp. TERN seeks to give small ships the ability to launch and re- cover medium-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aircraft systems. For air, the enthusiasm was some- what dampened by Rear Adm. Mark Butt, who is in charge of procurement, development and sustainment of capa- bilities across all domains for the U.S. Coast Guard. “The Coast Guard is not all into UAS yet,” he said. He went on to explain that the Federal Aviation Administration’s certificate of authorization process for public, domes- tic UAS to gain access to the airspace and extreme weather scenarios limits the usefulness of UAS in rapid response scenarios for the Coast Guard. In order to circumvent similar issues with unmanned underwater vehicles and unmanned surface vessels, Butt explained potential solutions to avoiding rules established in reaction to events and promoting innovation in robotic maritime applications. “I suggest industry take the lead in developing regulations for those mission spaces, because if there’s an event that causes a reaction, it’s going to drive the cost.” Involvement from industry and other partners is another key component. “Unmanned capabilities being ex- plored by other government agencies, academia and industry are crucial to informing and shaping future Marine Corps requirements and capability development,” said Killea. “For the true revolution in military affairs to happen here, I think that remotely piloted, man-in-the-loop sys- tems will quickly become a thing of the past,” Killea continued. “By achieving true autonomy, we will be able to ex- ploit the benefits of swarming systems, effective persistent counter unmanned systems as well as with unmanned casevac and medevac.” There are results in these areas right now. In April, the Office of Naval Research released a video of a recent demonstration of autonomous swarming UAS. Multiple UAS were launched from a tube and flew in formation as part of the Low-Cost Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Swarming Technology program. In April, the Navy also successfully completed aerial refueling of the un- manned X-47B. “Think of the complexity of that,” said U.S. Navy Program Executive Officer for Unmanned Aviation and Strike Weapons Mark Darrah. “The idea that we go to the right place in space, then we would rendezvous with the tanker, feel the seat of the basket, get the system ready to receive fuel, get to precontact, enter the basket, push the hose in, and release the one-way check valve to release the fuel and then exit safely. That’s a very complicated proposition.” Not as complicated as what is in store further down the road. Killea, Darrah and ONR Director Matt Winter all looked toward alternative technologies com- ing out of synthetic biology and neural networks science to achieve advanced autonomous functionality and coopera- tion across unmanned assets. “Networked cooperative systems will need to have the ability to au- tonomously coordinate their actions in response to the dynamic events of a conflict,” said Killea. “The key here is how those systems will communicate. This will be an area of great develop- ment in autonomous systems mov- ing forward. For swarming to work, I don’t think we can be dependent on the RF [radio frequency] spectrum. So we’ll need a way for them to passively communicate or potentially a method of sensing between the systems. They have a change in their environment, and they understand without having to directly communicate what their next steps or actions will be. That’s kind of like how termites work.” Although the officers were unsure how exactly this would be accomplished, they described a scenario where when one robotic asset senses a change in the environment, it would drop some sort of flag to let other assets know that the environment and therefore future mission directives have changed. “I agree with [Killea]. We cannot rely on RF. I want to know why the albatross is able to fly 3,000 miles and go back to its nest and get that navigation into an unmanned system,” says Darrah. The robots would be designed to make their own informed decisions; however, would still be under the purview of human oversight for serious decisions. “Humans must be kept in the loop, particularly in regard to use of force … and with actions that could lead to es- calations of crisis,” said Killea. “Human- machine teaming will be the approach.” The X-47B unmanned aircraft lines up with a tanker during a successful aerial refueling demonstration in April. Scan this QR code with your smart device to see a video of the LOCUST flying formation. SHOW SCAN