ULOOP Second industrial workshop overview

All rights reserved @ULOOP consortium 2010-2013
http://www.uloop.eu/
1ST
ULOOP INDUSTRIAL WORKSHOP
1
ULOOP Project Overview
The second generation of user-centric networking
Rute Sofia
(Scientific coordinator)
Rute.sofia@ulusofona.pt
SITILABS, University Lusófona
2nd
ULOOP Industrial Workshop
The Rise of User-centric Networks
Item: WO2008104497

2nd
Villarceaux, France – 19.06.2013
2
Motivation
Wi-Fi as the de-facto Internet access technology
 Final hop to the user
User-centric wireless architectures on the rise
 Low-cost, Sharing due to incentives
New opportunities for Internet stakeholders
 New business models
New opportunities for the end-user
 Wider roaming, socially-driven services
Project Details
 STREP, FP7 call 5, objective 1.1.1
 Duration: September 2010-August 2013
 Keywords: Dynamic spectrum management;
cooperative networking; low-cost wireless
architectures; user-centric
Main Expected Results
 Low-cost wireless local-loop architecture
 User-centric business models, sustainability
 Analysis of the impact on telecommunications
legislation
 Large-scale pilot, for wide demonstration
Overview

2nd
3
Vision and Key Innovation

2nd
4
Pilot
ZON, Lisboa

2nd
5
ULOOP Year by Year
Year 1 Year 3Year 2
WP3
WP2
WP4
WP5
ULOOP Framework
ULOOP Design
and Implementation
ULOOP Pilot, Training,
and Demonstrations
Scenarios and framework specified
Building blocks specified
Building blocks implemented
and locally validated
Integration
aspects
specified
Refined functionality
Pilot specification and setup
Testbeds and demo sites setup
and ready to work
Website
Regular
dissemination
1 industrial
event
Standardisation
contributions
1 scientific
workshop
1 scientific
workshop
1 industrial
event
DemosTraining
events

2nd
6
User-centric Networks (UCNs)
UCN Today
 Infrastructure or mesh based
 Complement(1 hop) existing
infrastructures
 Wireless link sharing within 1 hop
 1 user responsible for direct sharing to
N others
 “virtual” users on a “virtual
operator “database
Current Security Concerns
 SOME Privacy
 At home, normally WPA2
 Eduroam: privacy only on the wireless link
 Enterprise: VPN
 Basic security available for micro-provider
 No security for outsiders
 Liability Issues
 Who owns the responsibility in case of
wrongdoing?
 How can the provider distinguish?
Internet
NAP2
NAP1
Private
Public
Private

2nd
7
UCNs: Glimpse into the Future
Future UCNs
 Infrastructure or
mesh based BUT
 Multihop routing and relaying
 Path sharing (not
only 1 hop
sharing)
 X out of N users
responsible for
direct sharing to
The ULOOP Approach
 Ensuring Liability
Reputation schemes and Identity
management
 Supporting but controlling the viral
growth
Allow trust to be developed on the fly
Data confidentiality levels depend
on the trust circle!
“Legacy”
InternetViral growth
N users sharing

2nd
8
The End-to-End Perspective

2nd
9
Main Blocks

2nd
10
Main Blocks on a ULOOP Node

2nd
11
ULOOP addresses
cooperation incentives
both from an Internet
end-user and operator
perspective. ULOOP
intends to explore
incentives for good
behavior
Trust management in ULOOP
is the basis for the notions
concerning self-organization
and user-centricity

2nd
12
Resource management
optimization is a key aspect to
pursuit. ULOOP has as purpose
to assist in developing robust
and high debit wireless local-
loops in a way that meets
current broadband access
technologies debit as possible.
The user is expected to be able to cooperate
based on a perceived QoE and also on
individual expectations. The network will most
likely provide a dissimilar resource allocation.

2nd
13
In ULOOP handover support is
focused in attempting to mimic
the handover operation
available e.g. in cellular
environments..
Social mobility modeling is an aspect that shall assist
in deriving algorithms and functionality that can
anticipate the way nodes move based on analysis and
tracking of node movement through time..

2nd
14
Community Interaction Support
considers ways to optimize the
network operation and hence
network resources management
based on the fact that users are
normally placed in ULOOP
communities.
Offloading in ULOOP is addressed from the perspective that any intelligent offloading
mechanism can be taken care of (also controlled) in non-ULOOP systems. An
example is the guarantee that ULOOP nodes integrate capabilities that allow them to
support offloading e.g. from cellular networks to Wi-Fi based networks

2nd
15
Available Results
July 2013
July 2013
2nd
ULOOP industrial workshop
ICT 2013
July 2013July 2013

2nd
16
Today's Agenda
Demos
 Three ULOOP main blocks
– Trust management and cooperation incentives
– Resource management
– Mobility aspects
Standardization session
Discussion on ULOOP standardization aspects being worked upon

2nd
17
Project ULOOP
User-centric Wireless Local Loop
FP7/2007-2013
Project ULOOP has received funding from the
EU IST Seventh Framework Programme
under grant agreement no. 257418
Participants
Alcatel-Lucent Bell Labs, (FR)
COFAC c.r.l./University Lusófona (PT)
Huawei Technologies Duesseldorf GmbH (DE)
ARIA S.p.A (IT)
Caixa Mágica Software Lda (PT)
FON Wireless Ltd (UK)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
University of Kent (UK)
Université de Genève (CH)
Level7 srlu (IT)
University of Urbino (IT)
Contact
info@uloop.eu
FP7 ULOOP Project group on LinkedIn
#uloopproject on Twitter

ULOOP Second industrial workshop overview

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to ULOOP Second industrial workshop overview

Similar to ULOOP Second industrial workshop overview (20)

More from Rute C. Sofia

More from Rute C. Sofia (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

ULOOP Second industrial workshop overview