SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Industry Analysis for Software
as a Service Companies
Cisco Confidential 2© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Purpose: To understand key metrics and industry standards in order to
move from an On Prem to SaaS delivery model
Looked at 22 companies with selected criteria:
• Public SaaS Company
• Revenue ranging from 0-33 billion
• Growth Rates ranging from high growth to mature businesses
Analyzed Industry based on:
• Gross Margin
• Contribution Margin
• Professional Services Attach Rate
• Revenue Recognition (ratable vs consumption)
Methodology
• Growth Rate
• % spend on R&D
• % spend on S&M
• Hosting Model
AWS
BOX
Channel Advisor
Constant Contact
Covisint
CVENT
DemandWare
Hubspot
Jive
LinkedIn
Marketo
Netsuite
New Relic
Oracle
Pivotal
SAP
Service Now
SFDC
Splunk
Workday
Xactly
Zendesk
Cisco Confidential 3© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Reality…
Higher Professional Services
Attach Rates lead to lower Blended
Gross Margins
Software Gross Margin is between 70%-
90%* regardless of size of Revenue
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
BlendedGM%
PSAttachRate%
Professional Services Attach Rate Vs. Gross
Margin
PS Attach
Rate
Blended
GM %
-50%
-30%
-10%
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
SWGM%
Revenue($’k)
Software Gross Margin % by Revenue
Total Rev
SW GW %
*Software Includes Subscription & Support
*Blended Gross Margin includes Software &
Professional Services
Cisco Confidential 4© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Reality…
-200%
-160%
-120%
-80%
-40%
0%
40%
80%
120%
160%
200%
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
ContributionMargin%
CM %
3 year CAGR
Contribution Margin vs. 3 Year CAGR
S&M and R&D as % of Revenue vs. 3 year CAGR
High growth companies
generally have severely
negative contribution
margins.
Regardless of revenue,
average software gross
margin is 70%-90%.
High Growth companies invest heavily
in Sales & Marketing (60-80%). All
Companies invest roughly 15-30% in
R&D (regardless of growth rate)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
SMandRD%ofTotalRevenue
SM % of Rev
RD % of Rev
3 Year CAGR
Average length of existence not including
Oracle or Sap: 12 years
Cisco Confidential 5© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
• Invests 127% of revenue in
sales & marketing and
research & development
combined
• Sales & Marketing: 96%
• Research and development: 31%
• No Professional Services
• No Royalty Agreements*
• Only SaaS company to have a
high growth rate and positive
contribution margin
• 3 year CAGR: 51%
• Contribution Margin: 2%
• Year founded: 2002
Linkedin
• Fastest growing SaaS company in
our Analysis
• 3 year CAGR: 91%
• Contribution Margin: -21%
• Year founded: 2005Box
Cisco Confidential 6© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
 No company has successfully done both On-Prem and SaaS delivery models from the same BU – SAP
and Oracle do both from different BU’s
 Software Gross Margin across SaaS industry: 70-90% range
 High growth companies invest heavily in research and development and even more in Sales and marketing
 More mature companies have higher contribution margins, and manage OPEX spending.
 Almost all SaaS companies use 3rd party hosting -considered OPEX and not COGS.
 All SaaS companies
 use Ratable Revenue calculation (ex. $10M/5 years = $2M/year)
 include maintenance (Operate / Basic Support) as part of their Subscription Revenue
 Average Professional Services Attach rate:10-20%
 Average Services Gross Margin is Negative (-5% to -10%)
SaaS Company Analysis Indicators
Thank you.
Back-up Slides
Cisco Confidential 9© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Purpose
To understand key
metrics and industry
standards in order to
move from an On Prem
to SaaS
Selection Process
Looked at 22 companies
with selected criteria:
• Public SaaS Company
• Revenue ranging from 0-33 billion
Selected companies
Analyzed Industry based on:
• Attach Rates
• GM
• CM
• Growth Rates
• % Spend on R&D and S&M
• Revenue Recognition (ratable vs
consumption)
• Who hosts
SFDC
Xactly
Oracle
Marketo
Netsuite
COVS
Workday
BOX
SAP
Jive
LinkedIn
Splunk
Constant Contact
Service Now
New Relic
DemandWare
Pivotal
AWS
CVENT
Channel Advisor
Hubspot
Zendesk
Cisco Confidential 10© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Overall Percentage of
Software revenue after
SW cost of goods sold
should be around 70-
90%.
Software Gross Margin% by Company
• Other companies not included due to unreported
software COGS.
• SAP and Oracle not represented due to significantly
large difference in total revenue.
-50%
-30%
-10%
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
Total Rev
Cisco Confidential 11© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
• SAP & Oracle not included due to extremely large
difference in revenue.
• Pivotal & covisint not represented due to a 38%
and 42% blended GM; both have a higher
services to software ratio (PSA)
Blended Gross Margin% by Company
-50%
-30%
-10%
10%
30%
50%
70%
90%
110%
130%
$-
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
TotalRevenue
Total Rev
Blended GM %
Cisco Confidential 12© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
• The majority of high growth public
SaaS companies are unprofitable.
• More mature companies exhibit
positive contribution margins.
• Companies with larger growth rates
are investing heavily in S&M and R&D
Note: Company to look out for-
Linked in
Only SAAS company to have a
positive contribution margin and
high CAGR
-200%
-160%
-120%
-80%
-40%
0%
40%
80%
120%
160%
200%
-100%
-80%
-60%
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
ContributionMargin%
CM %
3 year CAGR
Cisco Confidential 13© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Key Indicators: SaaS Companies with 0-$310M Revenue
Average Across Selected SaaS Companies $0-$310M Revenue:
• 3 Year CAGR: ≈ 60%
• Software Gross Margin: 70%-90%
• Sales & Marketing Spend: ≈ 50%-60%
• R&D Spend: 20-25%
• Contribution Margin: ≈ -30%
Companies Total Revenue 3 Year CAGR Software GM
S&M Spend as a %
of Rev
R&D Spend as a % of
Rev Contribution Margin
Channel Advisor $84,901 26% 66% 20% -40%
Marketo $95,918 72% 71% 2% 2% -49%
New Relic $110,391 93% 80% 81% 22% -45%
Hubspot $115,876 50% 76% 5% 5% -42%
Zendesk $127,049 82% 61% 29% -52%
CVENT $142,245 31% 43% 10% 0%
DemandWare $160,553 39% 82% 46% 22% -17%
Jive $178,693 25% 73% 50% 29% -31%
BOX $216,440 92% 78% 96% 31% -21%
Splunk $302,623 58% 100% 71% 25% -26%
Pivotal $309,000 54%
• Software GM not included due to
unreported software COGS.
• Does not include S&M and R&D
for Pivotal due to involvement in
EMC inc.
Cisco Confidential 14© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Key Indicators: SaaS with $300M+ Revenue
Company Total Revenue 3 year CAGR SW GM%
S&M Spend as % of
Rev
R&D Spend as % of
Rev
Contribution
Margin
Constant Contact $ 331,678 15% 73% 38% 16% 6%
Netsuite $ 556,284 34% 84% 52% 19% -15%
Service Now $ 682,563 67% 75% 50% 22% -22%
Workday $ 787,860 70% 83% 40% 40% -27%
LinkedIn $ 2,219,676 51% 87% 24% 16% 2%
SFDC $ 4,071,003 34% 81% 53% 15% -7%
AWS $ 5,160,000 14%
SAP $ 16,815,000 9% 81% 25% 14% 27%
Oracle $ 32,903,000 2% 71% 20% 13% 39%
Average Across Selected SaaS Companies with $300M+ Revenue:
• 3 Year CAGR: ≈ 60%
• Software Gross Margin: 70%-80%
• Sales & Marketing Spend: ≈ 40%
• R&D Spend: 20%
• Contribution Margin: ≈ -15%-30%
• Note: Lack of information from
AWS due to unavailable 10-k
Cisco Confidential 15© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
• Bottom line: We want
most of our revenue from
software.
• As companies increase their professional services attach
rate, they tend to decrease their blended margins.
• Note: other companies not included due to 0% PSA rate
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
PSAttachRate%
PS Attach Rate
Blended GM %
Cisco Confidential 16© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
R&D and S&M spend as a % of Revenue vs 3 year CAGR
High Growth Companies Spend nearly 60-
80% of Revenue on Sales & Marketing and
20-40% on R&D
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BOX New Relic Splunk DemandWare CVENT Constant
Contact
COVS SAP Oracle
SMandRD%ofTotalRevenue
SM % of Rev
RD % of Rev
3 Year CAGR
• Sales & Marketing and research & development
revenue expenditures are essential to drive
incremental revenue and increase growth rates.

More Related Content

Similar to SaaS.Analysis

CFO update
CFO updateCFO update
CFO updateir_cisco
 
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba Customers
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba CustomersSAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba Customers
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba CustomersSAP Ariba
 
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...Sunil Grover
 
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentation
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentationSAP_Latest_Intro_presentation
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentationBala Murugan
 
The CMO Imperative - Data Driven Results
The CMO Imperative -  Data Driven ResultsThe CMO Imperative -  Data Driven Results
The CMO Imperative - Data Driven ResultsScribe Software Corp.
 
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics Strategy
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics StrategyWhy You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics Strategy
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics StrategyG3 Communications
 
Software industry financial_report_1_q16
Software industry financial_report_1_q16Software industry financial_report_1_q16
Software industry financial_report_1_q16Netreba
 
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Apps
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer AppsInside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Apps
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Appsdreamforce2006
 
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...Alicia Anderson
 
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft final
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft finalKelly kramer shareholder value draft final
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft finalir_cisco
 
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM Cloud
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM CloudCardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM Cloud
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM CloudPerficient, Inc.
 
CC&B SMECO Success Story
CC&B SMECO Success StoryCC&B SMECO Success Story
CC&B SMECO Success Storyvijaikrishnan
 
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.biz
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.bizBuilding successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.biz
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.bizAgile Equity
 

Similar to SaaS.Analysis (20)

CFO update
CFO updateCFO update
CFO update
 
SIIA & OPEXEngine: Let the Data Set You Free!
SIIA & OPEXEngine: Let the Data Set You Free!SIIA & OPEXEngine: Let the Data Set You Free!
SIIA & OPEXEngine: Let the Data Set You Free!
 
Getting Under the Hood of Company Valuations in M&A
Getting Under the Hood of Company Valuations in M&AGetting Under the Hood of Company Valuations in M&A
Getting Under the Hood of Company Valuations in M&A
 
SOA Presentation
SOA PresentationSOA Presentation
SOA Presentation
 
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba Customers
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba CustomersSAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba Customers
SAP Cloud Solutions for All Ariba Customers
 
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...
True Blue Partners review of key investment and merger and Acquisition trends...
 
BoSUSA23 | Lauren Kelley | Meaning in Metrics
BoSUSA23 | Lauren Kelley | Meaning in MetricsBoSUSA23 | Lauren Kelley | Meaning in Metrics
BoSUSA23 | Lauren Kelley | Meaning in Metrics
 
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture ClashUse the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
Use the Right Tools to Avoid the DevOps Culture Clash
 
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentation
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentationSAP_Latest_Intro_presentation
SAP_Latest_Intro_presentation
 
The CMO Imperative - Data Driven Results
The CMO Imperative -  Data Driven ResultsThe CMO Imperative -  Data Driven Results
The CMO Imperative - Data Driven Results
 
Spike - pitch deck
Spike - pitch deckSpike - pitch deck
Spike - pitch deck
 
Siteware stanford pitch v7
Siteware stanford pitch v7Siteware stanford pitch v7
Siteware stanford pitch v7
 
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics Strategy
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics StrategyWhy You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics Strategy
Why You Need Sensor Fusion In Your 2016 Retail Analytics Strategy
 
Software industry financial_report_1_q16
Software industry financial_report_1_q16Software industry financial_report_1_q16
Software industry financial_report_1_q16
 
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Apps
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer AppsInside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Apps
Inside the Enterprise Case Studies of Customer Apps
 
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...
Optimizing Project Resources and Improving Visibility in the Professional Ser...
 
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft final
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft finalKelly kramer shareholder value draft final
Kelly kramer shareholder value draft final
 
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM Cloud
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM CloudCardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM Cloud
Cardtronics Future Ready with Oracle EPM Cloud
 
CC&B SMECO Success Story
CC&B SMECO Success StoryCC&B SMECO Success Story
CC&B SMECO Success Story
 
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.biz
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.bizBuilding successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.biz
Building successful SaaS businesses by Cloudstrategies.biz
 

SaaS.Analysis

  • 1. Industry Analysis for Software as a Service Companies
  • 2. Cisco Confidential 2© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Purpose: To understand key metrics and industry standards in order to move from an On Prem to SaaS delivery model Looked at 22 companies with selected criteria: • Public SaaS Company • Revenue ranging from 0-33 billion • Growth Rates ranging from high growth to mature businesses Analyzed Industry based on: • Gross Margin • Contribution Margin • Professional Services Attach Rate • Revenue Recognition (ratable vs consumption) Methodology • Growth Rate • % spend on R&D • % spend on S&M • Hosting Model AWS BOX Channel Advisor Constant Contact Covisint CVENT DemandWare Hubspot Jive LinkedIn Marketo Netsuite New Relic Oracle Pivotal SAP Service Now SFDC Splunk Workday Xactly Zendesk
  • 3. Cisco Confidential 3© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Reality… Higher Professional Services Attach Rates lead to lower Blended Gross Margins Software Gross Margin is between 70%- 90%* regardless of size of Revenue 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% BlendedGM% PSAttachRate% Professional Services Attach Rate Vs. Gross Margin PS Attach Rate Blended GM % -50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 110% 130% $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 SWGM% Revenue($’k) Software Gross Margin % by Revenue Total Rev SW GW % *Software Includes Subscription & Support *Blended Gross Margin includes Software & Professional Services
  • 4. Cisco Confidential 4© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Reality… -200% -160% -120% -80% -40% 0% 40% 80% 120% 160% 200% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ContributionMargin% CM % 3 year CAGR Contribution Margin vs. 3 Year CAGR S&M and R&D as % of Revenue vs. 3 year CAGR High growth companies generally have severely negative contribution margins. Regardless of revenue, average software gross margin is 70%-90%. High Growth companies invest heavily in Sales & Marketing (60-80%). All Companies invest roughly 15-30% in R&D (regardless of growth rate) 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% SMandRD%ofTotalRevenue SM % of Rev RD % of Rev 3 Year CAGR Average length of existence not including Oracle or Sap: 12 years
  • 5. Cisco Confidential 5© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. • Invests 127% of revenue in sales & marketing and research & development combined • Sales & Marketing: 96% • Research and development: 31% • No Professional Services • No Royalty Agreements* • Only SaaS company to have a high growth rate and positive contribution margin • 3 year CAGR: 51% • Contribution Margin: 2% • Year founded: 2002 Linkedin • Fastest growing SaaS company in our Analysis • 3 year CAGR: 91% • Contribution Margin: -21% • Year founded: 2005Box
  • 6. Cisco Confidential 6© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.  No company has successfully done both On-Prem and SaaS delivery models from the same BU – SAP and Oracle do both from different BU’s  Software Gross Margin across SaaS industry: 70-90% range  High growth companies invest heavily in research and development and even more in Sales and marketing  More mature companies have higher contribution margins, and manage OPEX spending.  Almost all SaaS companies use 3rd party hosting -considered OPEX and not COGS.  All SaaS companies  use Ratable Revenue calculation (ex. $10M/5 years = $2M/year)  include maintenance (Operate / Basic Support) as part of their Subscription Revenue  Average Professional Services Attach rate:10-20%  Average Services Gross Margin is Negative (-5% to -10%) SaaS Company Analysis Indicators
  • 9. Cisco Confidential 9© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Purpose To understand key metrics and industry standards in order to move from an On Prem to SaaS Selection Process Looked at 22 companies with selected criteria: • Public SaaS Company • Revenue ranging from 0-33 billion Selected companies Analyzed Industry based on: • Attach Rates • GM • CM • Growth Rates • % Spend on R&D and S&M • Revenue Recognition (ratable vs consumption) • Who hosts SFDC Xactly Oracle Marketo Netsuite COVS Workday BOX SAP Jive LinkedIn Splunk Constant Contact Service Now New Relic DemandWare Pivotal AWS CVENT Channel Advisor Hubspot Zendesk
  • 10. Cisco Confidential 10© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Overall Percentage of Software revenue after SW cost of goods sold should be around 70- 90%. Software Gross Margin% by Company • Other companies not included due to unreported software COGS. • SAP and Oracle not represented due to significantly large difference in total revenue. -50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 110% 130% $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 Total Rev
  • 11. Cisco Confidential 11© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. • SAP & Oracle not included due to extremely large difference in revenue. • Pivotal & covisint not represented due to a 38% and 42% blended GM; both have a higher services to software ratio (PSA) Blended Gross Margin% by Company -50% -30% -10% 10% 30% 50% 70% 90% 110% 130% $- $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 TotalRevenue Total Rev Blended GM %
  • 12. Cisco Confidential 12© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. • The majority of high growth public SaaS companies are unprofitable. • More mature companies exhibit positive contribution margins. • Companies with larger growth rates are investing heavily in S&M and R&D Note: Company to look out for- Linked in Only SAAS company to have a positive contribution margin and high CAGR -200% -160% -120% -80% -40% 0% 40% 80% 120% 160% 200% -100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% ContributionMargin% CM % 3 year CAGR
  • 13. Cisco Confidential 13© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Key Indicators: SaaS Companies with 0-$310M Revenue Average Across Selected SaaS Companies $0-$310M Revenue: • 3 Year CAGR: ≈ 60% • Software Gross Margin: 70%-90% • Sales & Marketing Spend: ≈ 50%-60% • R&D Spend: 20-25% • Contribution Margin: ≈ -30% Companies Total Revenue 3 Year CAGR Software GM S&M Spend as a % of Rev R&D Spend as a % of Rev Contribution Margin Channel Advisor $84,901 26% 66% 20% -40% Marketo $95,918 72% 71% 2% 2% -49% New Relic $110,391 93% 80% 81% 22% -45% Hubspot $115,876 50% 76% 5% 5% -42% Zendesk $127,049 82% 61% 29% -52% CVENT $142,245 31% 43% 10% 0% DemandWare $160,553 39% 82% 46% 22% -17% Jive $178,693 25% 73% 50% 29% -31% BOX $216,440 92% 78% 96% 31% -21% Splunk $302,623 58% 100% 71% 25% -26% Pivotal $309,000 54% • Software GM not included due to unreported software COGS. • Does not include S&M and R&D for Pivotal due to involvement in EMC inc.
  • 14. Cisco Confidential 14© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Key Indicators: SaaS with $300M+ Revenue Company Total Revenue 3 year CAGR SW GM% S&M Spend as % of Rev R&D Spend as % of Rev Contribution Margin Constant Contact $ 331,678 15% 73% 38% 16% 6% Netsuite $ 556,284 34% 84% 52% 19% -15% Service Now $ 682,563 67% 75% 50% 22% -22% Workday $ 787,860 70% 83% 40% 40% -27% LinkedIn $ 2,219,676 51% 87% 24% 16% 2% SFDC $ 4,071,003 34% 81% 53% 15% -7% AWS $ 5,160,000 14% SAP $ 16,815,000 9% 81% 25% 14% 27% Oracle $ 32,903,000 2% 71% 20% 13% 39% Average Across Selected SaaS Companies with $300M+ Revenue: • 3 Year CAGR: ≈ 60% • Software Gross Margin: 70%-80% • Sales & Marketing Spend: ≈ 40% • R&D Spend: 20% • Contribution Margin: ≈ -15%-30% • Note: Lack of information from AWS due to unavailable 10-k
  • 15. Cisco Confidential 15© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. • Bottom line: We want most of our revenue from software. • As companies increase their professional services attach rate, they tend to decrease their blended margins. • Note: other companies not included due to 0% PSA rate 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% 180% 200% PSAttachRate% PS Attach Rate Blended GM %
  • 16. Cisco Confidential 16© 2013-2014 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. R&D and S&M spend as a % of Revenue vs 3 year CAGR High Growth Companies Spend nearly 60- 80% of Revenue on Sales & Marketing and 20-40% on R&D 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% BOX New Relic Splunk DemandWare CVENT Constant Contact COVS SAP Oracle SMandRD%ofTotalRevenue SM % of Rev RD % of Rev 3 Year CAGR • Sales & Marketing and research & development revenue expenditures are essential to drive incremental revenue and increase growth rates.