2. Identifying the clans’ rights
Preliminary identification of the customary rights of communities
of Botwali under the zoning process
Lo
ba
m
bo
EQUATEUR
BANDUNDU
MalualumbaMonde Arabe
Bola bo Nyamba
Nsenge
MalindaMahenge
Mongindi
Manginda
Mai NdombeMai Ndombe
Itongu
Lunda Moliko kua
Ibamba
Molumbu
Malonda
Mbye Liamba
Botwali
Mpenge
Boina
Mpili
MaangaDanos
Elikia-Meridjo Mankene
Iyumbu 2
Iyumbu 1
Kazamar Ilombe
Ilonga Mpenge
Mokula
Makolo ma Nonga
Bokoli
Mansi
Nsembo
Ngondola
Buekia
Matono
Matono
Nzilo
Etongu
Mbanza
Malinda1
Mpati
Ndeke
Mombenkolo
Luembe
Membai
Bonebetua
Lopemba
Bitale
Boobe
Bo mbo
Ipaki
Mpili
Bobele
Mekongo
Mionge
Elibalomba
Elongo
Malondo
Molik o
Bi
nk
olo
Malembo
Bolon
g'
On
son
g
o
BOMBUTE
MOWELE
BONGOLA
BOMPENGE
BOMAIYA
BOBAINZA
BONSAMBI
MOKELE
BOWANGA
BONYAMBA/NGONDOLABONYAMBA/NGONDOLA
BONYAMBA
BONSAMBI
MIABA 2MIABA 2 BOMBOLELE
MIABA
MABEKE
Sacred site
savannah
Tumba Lediima Natural Reserve
Scibois industrial logging concession
Wetland
Clan tenure
Land rights
Community’s activities and resources
Fishing in dam
Hunting area
Village
Camp
Road
Path
Track
Agricultural field
In DRC, participatory mapping was initiated by civil
society organizations in reaction to vast, centralized
land allocation processes threatening local communities
and indigenous peoples' customary land rights. Partici-
patory mapping proved to be a very adequate tool,
enabling the communities to identify their rights and
claim them. RFN and partners have been cooperating
since 2006, improving mapping technology, implement-
ing it in various contexts, including in the Itombwe forest
reserve.
Source: Participatory mapping conducted by Réseau Ressources Naturelles, DRC. Research and GIS cartography by Barthélemy Boika, 2013
3. ALGERIA LIBIA
MAROCCO
Sahara
Occidentale
EGITTO
SUDANCHAD
NIGER
MALI
MAURITANIA
NIGERIA
REPUBBLICA
DEMOCRATICA
DEL CONGO
ANGOLA
NAMIBIA
SUDAFRICA
BOTSWANA
ZIMBABWE
MOZAMBICO
TANZANIA
KENYA
SOMALIA
MADAGASCAR
ETIOPIA
Somaliland
ERITREA
SUD
SUDAN
REPUBBLICA
CENTRAFRICANA
CONGO
GABON
GUINEA EQ.
BENIN
TOGO
GHANA
COSTA
D’AVORIO
BURKINA FASO
SENEGAL
GUINEA
SIERRA LEONE
LIBERIA
GUINEA BISSAU
GAMBIA
UGANDA
RWANDA
BURUNDI
DJIBOUTI
MALAWI
ZAMBIA
LESOTHO
SWAZILAND
VersoSingapore,via
D
ubai
VersoSudEstAsiaticoeCina
Vers
o Europa e Stati Uniti
Verso Sud Est Asiatico e Cina
Verso Sud Est Asiatico e Cina
Verso Sud Est Asiatico e Cina
Beitbridge
Durban
Beira
Lusaka
Lubumbashi
Nairobi
Livingstone
Lilongwe
Dar es Salaam
Zanzibar
Pemba
Maputo
Mombasa
Città del Capo
Khartoum
QATAR DUBAI
Cairo
LagosLagos
Douala
Luanda
Kinshasa
I centri del traffico di avorio
Punti di transito
Centri di esportazione
Principali mercati domestici Via aerea
Via mare
Via terra
Via mare
Le rotte del contrabbando
Altri porti commerciali
Habitat dell’Elefante Africano
Conosciuto
Possibile
22
16
3
1
Avorio confiscato in Africa, 2009-2011
Tonnellate
Sono inclusi solo i singoli sequestri maggiori di 800 Kg
Il mercato nero dell’oro bianco
Fonti: CITES, CoP14 Proposal 6, 2007; Wasser, S., K., et al., Using DNA to track the origin of the largest ivory seizure since the 1989 trade ban, PNAS, 2007; Environment Investigation Agency
(EIA), How China’s illegal ivory trade is causing a 21st century African elephant disaster, 2007; UNODC, Promoting health, security and justice, 2010; personal communication with Dr Christian
Nelleman, GRID-Arendal, 2012.
Avorio sequestrato nel mondo
Fonte: ETIS 2013
Tonnellate
0 10 20 30
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
5. STATI UNITI
CANADA
MESSICO
EL SALVADOR
PANAMA
PORTO RICO
CUBA
GRAN
BRETAGNA
45
10
7
Migranti regolari e irregolariControllo della mobilità
Milioni
Paese di provenienza
Paese di destinazione
Sono visualizzati i movimenti per i 10 paesi con maggior immigrazione,
e i paesi di origine con piu’ di un milione di migranti
Stato con una o piu’ barriere di
separazione su parte dei suoi confini
internazionali
Zona Economica Speciale (SEZ):
area di libero commercio, al cui
interno non vige la normativa
Nazionale in termini di regime
fiscale, diritti del lavoro o altre
restrizioni. Come il muro di
separazione, crea un sistema di
controllo della mobilita
Muro di separazione, barriera difensiva,
recinzione per impedire il passaggio di
forza lavoro o traffici illegali
Fonti: Sandro Mezzadra e Brett Neilson, Borders as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labour, 2013; Réseau MIGREUROP, Atlas des Migrants en Europe, 2012; UN-DESA, Trends in
International Migrant Stock: Migrants by Destination and Origin, 2013; El Pais, Un Mundo De Migrantes, mappa interattiva; International Organization for migrations; The Guardian,
Walled World, 2013.
Flusso migratorio la cui mobilità
viene limitata da un muro (fisico o
legale) che trasforma lo status del
migrante a potenziale condizione di
irregolare o illegale, e per questo
passibile di detenzione o espulsione
Flusso migratorio
Muri di separazione e controllo della mobilità del lavoro
6.
7. Multiple stressors and Climate-resilient development pathwaysment pathways
Low risk
High resilience
High risk
Low resilience
Social
stressors
Non-climate
biophysical
stressors
MULTIPLE
STRESSORS
Climate
change
Non-climate related
biophysical stressors
are constraining
resilience
Opportunity space
Social stressors are
reducing resilience
Resilience
Policy, decision making and
choices leading to low or
high resilience and risk
CLIMATE-RESILIENT
PATHWAYS
8. Dairy
products
Roots
and tubers
Fruits and
vegetables
Total production
Production
Loss and waste
Oil crops
and pulses
Cereals Fish
Meat
2 404
798
551
1 644
264
49
146
46
767
116
707
346
97
664
6 574
North America
and Oceania
Europe
Southand
Southern
AsiaLatin
America
Industrialized
Asia
Sub-Saharan
Africa
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
aaaaaa
aaaaa
att
eeeeme
ffffAfAfAff
Per capita food
loss and waste
Kilogrammes per year
Total food production volume
and food loss and waste
Million tonnes
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Production to retail
Consumption
9. 232
Million tonnes
100
50
20
Food loss and waste by region
Dairy
products
Roots
and tubers
Fruits and
vegetables
Oil crops
and pulsesCereals
Fish
Meat
North America
and Oceania North America
and Oceania
North America
and Oceania
North America
and Oceania
North America
and Oceania
North America
and Oceania
North America
and Oceania
Europe Europe
Europe
Industrialized
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
South and
Southern
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Industrialized
Asia
Europe
Europe
Europe
Europe
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Sub-Saharan
AfricaSub-Saharan
Africa
Sub-Saharan
Africa
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
NorthAfrica,
West and
Central Asia
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
North Africa,
West and
Central Asia
Sub-Saharan
Africa
Source: FAO, Global Food Losses and Food Waste, 2011
Latin
America
Latin
America
Latin
America
Latin
America
Latin
America
Latin
America
Latin
America
Food loss and waste
11. Central
Africa
Eastern
Africa
Southern
Africa
Mainland
Southeast Asia
Arafura
Sea
Indonesia
Golden
escent
MyanmarMyanmar
New and old trafficking routes
Drugs
Cyber crimesIllegal
fishing
Illegal trafficking of
toxic wastes
Wildlife trafficking
200
50
100
30
23
12
20
Illegal logging and
trade
Annual revenue, higher estimates
Billion dollars
A growing sector
Illegal
trafficking of
light weapons
“Traditional” illegal trafficking.
Includes heroin, cocaine and
human beings
Main destination country
Main transit country
Country of origin of “traditional”
illegal trafficking
Main country or region of origin of
environmental-related illegal trafficking
Environment-related illegal trafficking.
Includes wood, wildlife, animal parts (i.e.ivory,
rhinocerous horns and fur) and wastes
Main illegal, unreported and
unregulated fishing areas
Sources: UNODC Annual Reports 2010 e 2013; WWF-Australia;
Globaltimber.co.uk, Estimates of the percentage of “Illegal
Timber” in the imports of wood-based products from selected
countries, 2007; TRAFFIC; FAO; World Ocean Review Report
2013; Michigan State University, Human Trafficking Task Force;
Greenpeace, The Toxic Ship, 2010; National Geographic press
review.
Sources: TRAFFIC; FAO; UNODC;
Global Financial Integrity
