SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 9
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 1
NOVEMEBER 8TH
, 2016: SANTA CLARA COUNTY’S 2016 MEASURES
MEASURE A: Santa Clara County
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 $950 Million bond for affordable
housing in Santa Clara County:
o $700 million towards
housing for homeless &
low income individuals
o $100 million towards
family housing
o $150 million towards
first-time homebuyers
programs
 Money comes from small
increase in property taxes based
on the value of the property
 Will require citizen oversight and
routine audits to make sure the
county sticks to the spending plan
 Property tax will not be raised
and more housing will NOT be
created for Santa Clara County’s
low income, homeless, families
and individuals
 Requires 2/3 majority vote
MEASURE B: Santa Clara County
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Sales taxes would increase by
0.25% for the next 15 years.
 Money from this measure can be
used for any governmental
purpose: including improving
police response; improving 911/
emergency medical/ fire response
times; repairing potholes and
streets; expanding gang
prevention; and more
 Measure includes a built-in
citizen watchdog committee to
keep an eye on spending
 Sales tax would remain at 8.75%
and the city would not receive
extra funds for city maintenance
MEASURE C: Cupertino
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Limits Cupertino’s
redevelopment plan of the Vallco
Shopping District
o Requires voter approval for
changes to mall remodels
 Voter approval will NOT be
required towards Cupertino’s
Vallco Shopping District’s
remodeling plans
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 2
MEASURE D: Cupertino
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 In Cupertino’s Vallco Town
Shopping Center, Measure D
requires:
o Up to 800 residential units
with a 20% set-aside for
seniors
o 2 million square feet of
office space; 640,000
square feet of retail and
room for a hotel, a park,
and educational uses
o There will be no required land
allotment for housing, office
space, retail, hotel, and/or park
space
MEASURE E: Santa Clara County
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Requires businesses with 35+
employees to offer additional
work hours to current qualified
part-time workers BEFORE
hiring new employees (and/or
additional temps or
subcontractors)
o This excludes government
jobs and allows companies
to apply for a “hardship”
exemption if they can
prove they cannot offer
full-time to their
employees
 There will be NO regulations on
how or when a business must
offer full-time positions to staff
MEASURE F: San Jose
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 City of San Jose employees will:
o Lose funding for retiree
healthcare for new
employees
o Potentially reduce costs of
supplemental pension
payments
o Reinstate disability
retirement provisions for
injured police officers,
firefighters and other City
employees
o Continue to require voter
approval for benefit
increases
 Funding for City of San Jose
employees will stay the same
 Voter approval will still be
required for City of San Jose
employee benefit increases
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 3
MEASURE G: San Jose
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Increases the minimum tax a
business owner pays based on:
o # of employees
o Sq. footage of leased space
 Measure allows for adjustment of
tax according to inflation
 Nonprofits and smaller businesses
are not affected by this measure
 Money earned from measure will
be put in San Jose’s general fund
for emergency response, road
repair, and city services
 Minimum taxes a business owner
has to pay do not change
MEASURE H: Gilroy
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Limits available land for
commercial and industrial
development
 Will NOT allow housing and/or
business buildings to be created
in certain open spaces in Gilroy
 Changes to this land use measure
cannot be made until 12/2040
 Allows the City of Gilroy to
expand city limits for business
and housing developments
MEASURE I: Milpitas
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Limits development within
Milpitas to the valley floor and
the base of the foothills
 Will NOT allow housing and/or
business buildings to be created
in certain open spaces in Milpitas
 Changes to this land use measure
cannot be made until 12/2038
without voter approval
 Voter approval for city growth
boundaries will expire 12/2018.
This means that the city growth
boundary can be changed at any
time by the City Council of
Milpitas
MEASURE J: Milpitas
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Voters will be asked to vote on
park rezoning, the use of open
spaces, residential vs. commercial
land use and more regarding the
growth boundary lines in Milpitas
 Votes from the public will not be
as intensely required as Milpitas
continues to grow
MEASURE K: Milpitas
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 4
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Any attempt to rezone parks,
parklands or open space to
residential, commercial or
industrial, or any proposal for
residential, commercial or
industrial development in parks,
parkland or open space, must be
placed before Milpitas voters and
secure 2/3 voter’s support in the
City’s next general election
 Votes from the public will not be
as intensely required as Milpitas
continues to grow
MEASURE L: Milpitas
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Gives Milpitas voters the power
to confirm or deny the city’s
decision to send its trash to
Guadalupe Recycling and
Disposal Facility in San Jose
starting next year
 The city will continue to send its
trash to Newby Island Resource
and Recovery Park.
 The contract with Waste
Management, Inc., was originally
approved by the City Council
earlier this year but quickly
suspended by a petition from
Republic Services of Santa Clara
County
MEASURE M: Sunnyvale
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Requires a majority vote of
Sunnyvale Voters before the City
Council can approve the sale,
lease, swap or transfer of certain
types of city land which has been
used as either 1) a public park, or
2) a community service amenity
 City Council has the authority to
sell, lease or even trade, swap or
transfer city land with no more
than a majority Council vote. The
residents of Sunnyvale have no
direct control over these
decisions. A “no vote” keeps it
that way
MEASURE N: Sunnyvale
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 The measure would NOT raise
tax rates
 Sunnyvale residents already pay a
Utility Users Tax (UUT) this
measure would update the tax
 Funds would be drawn from all
technology and
telecommunication users
 UUT $ goes into the city’s
general funds
 Taxes would NOT rise but the
Utility Users Tax (UUT) will
remain “outdated” and will
continue to apply to electricity,
natural gas, and to telephone calls
made from landline and cell
phones.
MEASURE O: Santa Clara
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 5
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Santa Clara will have the option
of giving their part-time mayor a
raise from $1,387 to $2,500 a
month and the City Council
members a pay bump from $832
to $2,000 a month
 Also creates a Salary Setting
Commission to review and adjust
those pay raises every two years
 The mayor and the City Council
will NOT receive a raise
 No Salary Setting Commission
will be created
MEASURE P: Santa Clara
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Limits the Santa Clara City
Council to no more than two full
terms per office
 Designed to prevent council
members taking a two-year hiatus
before running for office again
 There will be no term limit on
Santa Clara City Council
members
 Council members will be allowed
to take a 2 year break and then
run for office again
MEASURE Q: Santa Clara
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Vacancies in any elective office
of the City must be filled by a 4/5
vote of the City Council should a
Council member abruptly leave
their position
 Vacancies in City Council will
continue to be filled based on a
majority vote by City Council
members
MEASURE R: Santa Clara
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Santa Clara would be unable to
sell public parkland or open space
without voter approval
 Any applicable land transactions
would require 2/3 voter approval
before the land is sold
 Currently, the only restriction on
the sale of city owned property is
that the city must follow a
particular bidding procedure. A
“no vote” will keep that rule in
place and nothing else will stand
in the way of selling city owned
property
MEASURE S: Morgan Hill
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Establishes a population ceiling
of 58,200 people
 Improves policies to encourage
the conservation of water and the
preservation of land
 The population ceiling will not be
issued and improvement to land
use, water conservation, and land
preservation will have to be
written and/or voted via a
different initiative
MEASURE T: Los Gatos
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 6
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Rental tax paid only by
hotel/lodging guests: Measure T
increases short-term rental tax by
2%
 Could raise up to $400,000 per
year to be used in the city’s
general funds
 Will continue to publish annual
audits & provide fiscal oversight
 All funds spent locally for Los
Gatos
 The 2% increase tax for
hotel/lodging guests in Los Gatos
will not occur
MEASURE U: San Benito High School District (Hollister)
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Issues $60 million in bonds to the
San Benito High School District
strictly for school improvements,
classroom sizes, facility upgrades
 NO money will go to
administrator salaries
 Measure includes citizen
oversight and annual audits of $
 No bond money will be given to
San Benito High School District
MEASURE V: Mountain View
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Measure would tie rental
increases to inflation within the
economy—allowing increases to
range from 2-5% with only one
rent increase allowed a year in
Mountain View
 Applies only to apartments built
before 1996 and certain
affordable housing units
 Landlords can “bank” from years
with no rent increase, but with a
cap of 10% rent increase in any
given year
 Requires that landlords can only
evict a tenant due to “just” cause
 The City of Mountain View does
not currently regulate the amount
of rent a landlord may charge
 A no vote on Measure A would
allow landlords to increase rent
according to CA law and allow
them to evict tenants as landlords
see fit
MEASURE W: Mountain View
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 7
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Tenants of Mountain View could
challenge rent hikes over 5% a
year by pulling landlords into
mediation
 If evicted from a Mountain View
rental, Measure W requires
relocation assistance for renters &
includes a binding-arbitration
clause for disputes between
tenants and landlords

 Mountain View residents will not
have access to meditation through
the city
 There will be no city supportive
programs if a tenant feels they are
wrongfully evicted
MEASURE X: San Jose-Evergreen Community College District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Issues a $748 million bond to
expand and renovate both
community college’s campuses
 No money would go to salaries or
pensions
 All funds would be subject to
citizen oversight
 No bond money will be given to
the San Jose-Evergreen
Community College District
MEASURE Y: San Jose Unified School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 $72 parcel tax, which would raise
$5 million a year for eight years
until it expires.
 independent citizen oversight and
would restrict funds from paying
district salaries.
 No bond money will be given to
the San Jose-Evergreen
Community College District
MEASURE Z: East Side Union High School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Issues a $510 million bond to
upgrade school facilities and
classroom technology
 No money would go to
employees’ salaries or pensions
 All funds would be subject to
citizen oversight
 No bond money will be given to
the East Side Union High School
District
MEASURE AA: Campbell Union High School District
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 8
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Issues a $275 million bond to
upgrade school facilities and
classroom
 District will take on the new bond
debt, which it plans to pay off by
collecting a $30 parcel tax for
every $100,000 in assessed value
 No bond money will be given to
the Campbell Union High School
District
MEASURE BB: Sunnyvale Union School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Sunnyvale School District will be
authorized to renew its existing
$59 per parcel tax
o The parcel tax will provide
$1 million annually for
seven years beginning July
1, 2018, with exemptions
for senior citizens
 Funds for school improvement
 Money spent will be audited and
reviewed by a citizens’ oversight
committee
 No funds will be spent on
administrators
 The parcel tax will not be
renewed and Sunnyvale Union
School District will not receive
funding in this form
MEASURE CC: Campbell Union School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Issues $72 million in bonds to
improve school facilities and
upgrade classroom equipment
 Includes citizens’ oversight and
financial audits of spending
 No funds for administrator
salaries
 No bond money will be given to
the Campbell Union School
District
MEASURE EE: Oak Grove School District
County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 9
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Oak Grove School District will be
authorized to renew its existing
$132 per parcel tax
o The parcel tax will provide
$3.1 million annually for
nine years with exemptions
for senior citizens
 Money spent will be audited &
reviewed by a citizens’ oversight
committee
 Funds spent on school
improvement
 The parcel tax will not be
renewed and Oak Grove School
District will not receive funding
in this form
 A Parcel tax is a form of property
tax assessed at a rate based on the
characteristics of a "parcel" (aka
one chunk of the land), rather
than on the assessed value of the
whole property, which is the
standard method of levying
property taxes
MEASURE GG: Los Altos School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Los Altos School District will be
authorized to renew its existing
$223 per parcel tax
o The parcel tax will provide
$2.8 million annually for
eight years with
exemptions for senior
citizens
 Funds spent on school
improvement
 Money spent will be audited &
reviewed by a citizens’ oversight
committee
 No money spent on
administrative salaries
 The parcel tax will not be
renewed and Los Altos School
District will not receive funding
in this form
MEASURE HH: Franklin-McKinley School District
A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:
 Franklin-McKinley District will
be authorized to renew its
existing $72 parcel tax
o The parcel tax will provide
$2.8 million annually for
nine years with exemptions
for senior citizens
 Funds spent on school
improvement
 Money spent will be audited &
reviewed by a citizens’ oversight
committee
 The parcel tax will not be
renewed and Franklin-McKinley
School District will not receive
funding in this form

More Related Content

Similar to Measures Explained

Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...
Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...
Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...TWCA
 
Summer 2013 County Legislative Update
Summer 2013 County Legislative UpdateSummer 2013 County Legislative Update
Summer 2013 County Legislative UpdatePublicFinanceTV
 
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August EC
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August ECLocal Govt Policy Sheet - August EC
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August ECJames Touchton, MPA
 
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130Franklin Matters
 
Annual plan 2016 2017
Annual plan 2016 2017Annual plan 2016 2017
Annual plan 2016 2017Council2016
 
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docx
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docxDeanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docx
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docxedwardmarivel
 
Grant Opportunities for Local Governments
Grant Opportunities for Local GovernmentsGrant Opportunities for Local Governments
Grant Opportunities for Local GovernmentsMaria Stamoulis
 
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32rath4thekids
 
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative Update
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative UpdateWinter 2014 NCACC Legislative Update
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative UpdatePublicFinanceTV
 
2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved
2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved
2016 State Legislative Platform-ApprovedRandi Knott
 
Julie luton texas house district 70
Julie luton texas house district 70Julie luton texas house district 70
Julie luton texas house district 70rath4thekids
 
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 0707142014 Florida Public Works Expo
 
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives Report
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives ReportSpecial 2012 Ballot Initiatives Report
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives Reportartba
 
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUC
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUCMonte Sereno Letter to CPUC
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUCRishi Kumar
 
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutes
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM MinutesItem # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutes
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutesahcitycouncil
 
Eastpointe_Living_Guide
Eastpointe_Living_GuideEastpointe_Living_Guide
Eastpointe_Living_GuideBill Driskell
 
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-thinkAPA Florida
 

Similar to Measures Explained (20)

Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...
Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...
Special Purpose Districts: Serving a Critical Role in Meeting Water Demands i...
 
Summer 2013 County Legislative Update
Summer 2013 County Legislative UpdateSummer 2013 County Legislative Update
Summer 2013 County Legislative Update
 
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August EC
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August ECLocal Govt Policy Sheet - August EC
Local Govt Policy Sheet - August EC
 
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130
Community Preservation Act Adoption 20200130
 
Annual plan 2016 2017
Annual plan 2016 2017Annual plan 2016 2017
Annual plan 2016 2017
 
Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber Presentation 3/11/2021
Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber Presentation 3/11/2021Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber Presentation 3/11/2021
Murrieta/Wildomar Chamber Presentation 3/11/2021
 
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docx
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docxDeanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docx
Deanna’s Input for Question 3As Chief Financial Management Of.docx
 
Grant Opportunities for Local Governments
Grant Opportunities for Local GovernmentsGrant Opportunities for Local Governments
Grant Opportunities for Local Governments
 
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32
Todd Maternowski Congressional District 32
 
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative Update
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative UpdateWinter 2014 NCACC Legislative Update
Winter 2014 NCACC Legislative Update
 
2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved
2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved
2016 State Legislative Platform-Approved
 
FINAL-OT Fall 2015
FINAL-OT Fall 2015FINAL-OT Fall 2015
FINAL-OT Fall 2015
 
F3 Village Development
F3 Village DevelopmentF3 Village Development
F3 Village Development
 
Julie luton texas house district 70
Julie luton texas house district 70Julie luton texas house district 70
Julie luton texas house district 70
 
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714
Community redevelopment areas and public infrastructure 070714
 
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives Report
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives ReportSpecial 2012 Ballot Initiatives Report
Special 2012 Ballot Initiatives Report
 
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUC
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUCMonte Sereno Letter to CPUC
Monte Sereno Letter to CPUC
 
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutes
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM MinutesItem # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutes
Item # 1b August 28, 2023 CCM Minutes
 
Eastpointe_Living_Guide
Eastpointe_Living_GuideEastpointe_Living_Guide
Eastpointe_Living_Guide
 
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think
9/8 THUR 14:30 | Regulatory Re-think
 

Measures Explained

  • 1. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 1 NOVEMEBER 8TH , 2016: SANTA CLARA COUNTY’S 2016 MEASURES MEASURE A: Santa Clara County A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  $950 Million bond for affordable housing in Santa Clara County: o $700 million towards housing for homeless & low income individuals o $100 million towards family housing o $150 million towards first-time homebuyers programs  Money comes from small increase in property taxes based on the value of the property  Will require citizen oversight and routine audits to make sure the county sticks to the spending plan  Property tax will not be raised and more housing will NOT be created for Santa Clara County’s low income, homeless, families and individuals  Requires 2/3 majority vote MEASURE B: Santa Clara County A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Sales taxes would increase by 0.25% for the next 15 years.  Money from this measure can be used for any governmental purpose: including improving police response; improving 911/ emergency medical/ fire response times; repairing potholes and streets; expanding gang prevention; and more  Measure includes a built-in citizen watchdog committee to keep an eye on spending  Sales tax would remain at 8.75% and the city would not receive extra funds for city maintenance MEASURE C: Cupertino A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Limits Cupertino’s redevelopment plan of the Vallco Shopping District o Requires voter approval for changes to mall remodels  Voter approval will NOT be required towards Cupertino’s Vallco Shopping District’s remodeling plans
  • 2. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 2 MEASURE D: Cupertino A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  In Cupertino’s Vallco Town Shopping Center, Measure D requires: o Up to 800 residential units with a 20% set-aside for seniors o 2 million square feet of office space; 640,000 square feet of retail and room for a hotel, a park, and educational uses o There will be no required land allotment for housing, office space, retail, hotel, and/or park space MEASURE E: Santa Clara County A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Requires businesses with 35+ employees to offer additional work hours to current qualified part-time workers BEFORE hiring new employees (and/or additional temps or subcontractors) o This excludes government jobs and allows companies to apply for a “hardship” exemption if they can prove they cannot offer full-time to their employees  There will be NO regulations on how or when a business must offer full-time positions to staff MEASURE F: San Jose A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  City of San Jose employees will: o Lose funding for retiree healthcare for new employees o Potentially reduce costs of supplemental pension payments o Reinstate disability retirement provisions for injured police officers, firefighters and other City employees o Continue to require voter approval for benefit increases  Funding for City of San Jose employees will stay the same  Voter approval will still be required for City of San Jose employee benefit increases
  • 3. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 3 MEASURE G: San Jose A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Increases the minimum tax a business owner pays based on: o # of employees o Sq. footage of leased space  Measure allows for adjustment of tax according to inflation  Nonprofits and smaller businesses are not affected by this measure  Money earned from measure will be put in San Jose’s general fund for emergency response, road repair, and city services  Minimum taxes a business owner has to pay do not change MEASURE H: Gilroy A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Limits available land for commercial and industrial development  Will NOT allow housing and/or business buildings to be created in certain open spaces in Gilroy  Changes to this land use measure cannot be made until 12/2040  Allows the City of Gilroy to expand city limits for business and housing developments MEASURE I: Milpitas A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Limits development within Milpitas to the valley floor and the base of the foothills  Will NOT allow housing and/or business buildings to be created in certain open spaces in Milpitas  Changes to this land use measure cannot be made until 12/2038 without voter approval  Voter approval for city growth boundaries will expire 12/2018. This means that the city growth boundary can be changed at any time by the City Council of Milpitas MEASURE J: Milpitas A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Voters will be asked to vote on park rezoning, the use of open spaces, residential vs. commercial land use and more regarding the growth boundary lines in Milpitas  Votes from the public will not be as intensely required as Milpitas continues to grow MEASURE K: Milpitas
  • 4. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 4 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Any attempt to rezone parks, parklands or open space to residential, commercial or industrial, or any proposal for residential, commercial or industrial development in parks, parkland or open space, must be placed before Milpitas voters and secure 2/3 voter’s support in the City’s next general election  Votes from the public will not be as intensely required as Milpitas continues to grow MEASURE L: Milpitas A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Gives Milpitas voters the power to confirm or deny the city’s decision to send its trash to Guadalupe Recycling and Disposal Facility in San Jose starting next year  The city will continue to send its trash to Newby Island Resource and Recovery Park.  The contract with Waste Management, Inc., was originally approved by the City Council earlier this year but quickly suspended by a petition from Republic Services of Santa Clara County MEASURE M: Sunnyvale A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Requires a majority vote of Sunnyvale Voters before the City Council can approve the sale, lease, swap or transfer of certain types of city land which has been used as either 1) a public park, or 2) a community service amenity  City Council has the authority to sell, lease or even trade, swap or transfer city land with no more than a majority Council vote. The residents of Sunnyvale have no direct control over these decisions. A “no vote” keeps it that way MEASURE N: Sunnyvale A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  The measure would NOT raise tax rates  Sunnyvale residents already pay a Utility Users Tax (UUT) this measure would update the tax  Funds would be drawn from all technology and telecommunication users  UUT $ goes into the city’s general funds  Taxes would NOT rise but the Utility Users Tax (UUT) will remain “outdated” and will continue to apply to electricity, natural gas, and to telephone calls made from landline and cell phones. MEASURE O: Santa Clara
  • 5. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 5 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Santa Clara will have the option of giving their part-time mayor a raise from $1,387 to $2,500 a month and the City Council members a pay bump from $832 to $2,000 a month  Also creates a Salary Setting Commission to review and adjust those pay raises every two years  The mayor and the City Council will NOT receive a raise  No Salary Setting Commission will be created MEASURE P: Santa Clara A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Limits the Santa Clara City Council to no more than two full terms per office  Designed to prevent council members taking a two-year hiatus before running for office again  There will be no term limit on Santa Clara City Council members  Council members will be allowed to take a 2 year break and then run for office again MEASURE Q: Santa Clara A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Vacancies in any elective office of the City must be filled by a 4/5 vote of the City Council should a Council member abruptly leave their position  Vacancies in City Council will continue to be filled based on a majority vote by City Council members MEASURE R: Santa Clara A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Santa Clara would be unable to sell public parkland or open space without voter approval  Any applicable land transactions would require 2/3 voter approval before the land is sold  Currently, the only restriction on the sale of city owned property is that the city must follow a particular bidding procedure. A “no vote” will keep that rule in place and nothing else will stand in the way of selling city owned property MEASURE S: Morgan Hill A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Establishes a population ceiling of 58,200 people  Improves policies to encourage the conservation of water and the preservation of land  The population ceiling will not be issued and improvement to land use, water conservation, and land preservation will have to be written and/or voted via a different initiative MEASURE T: Los Gatos
  • 6. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 6 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Rental tax paid only by hotel/lodging guests: Measure T increases short-term rental tax by 2%  Could raise up to $400,000 per year to be used in the city’s general funds  Will continue to publish annual audits & provide fiscal oversight  All funds spent locally for Los Gatos  The 2% increase tax for hotel/lodging guests in Los Gatos will not occur MEASURE U: San Benito High School District (Hollister) A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Issues $60 million in bonds to the San Benito High School District strictly for school improvements, classroom sizes, facility upgrades  NO money will go to administrator salaries  Measure includes citizen oversight and annual audits of $  No bond money will be given to San Benito High School District MEASURE V: Mountain View A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Measure would tie rental increases to inflation within the economy—allowing increases to range from 2-5% with only one rent increase allowed a year in Mountain View  Applies only to apartments built before 1996 and certain affordable housing units  Landlords can “bank” from years with no rent increase, but with a cap of 10% rent increase in any given year  Requires that landlords can only evict a tenant due to “just” cause  The City of Mountain View does not currently regulate the amount of rent a landlord may charge  A no vote on Measure A would allow landlords to increase rent according to CA law and allow them to evict tenants as landlords see fit MEASURE W: Mountain View
  • 7. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 7 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Tenants of Mountain View could challenge rent hikes over 5% a year by pulling landlords into mediation  If evicted from a Mountain View rental, Measure W requires relocation assistance for renters & includes a binding-arbitration clause for disputes between tenants and landlords   Mountain View residents will not have access to meditation through the city  There will be no city supportive programs if a tenant feels they are wrongfully evicted MEASURE X: San Jose-Evergreen Community College District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Issues a $748 million bond to expand and renovate both community college’s campuses  No money would go to salaries or pensions  All funds would be subject to citizen oversight  No bond money will be given to the San Jose-Evergreen Community College District MEASURE Y: San Jose Unified School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  $72 parcel tax, which would raise $5 million a year for eight years until it expires.  independent citizen oversight and would restrict funds from paying district salaries.  No bond money will be given to the San Jose-Evergreen Community College District MEASURE Z: East Side Union High School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Issues a $510 million bond to upgrade school facilities and classroom technology  No money would go to employees’ salaries or pensions  All funds would be subject to citizen oversight  No bond money will be given to the East Side Union High School District MEASURE AA: Campbell Union High School District
  • 8. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 8 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Issues a $275 million bond to upgrade school facilities and classroom  District will take on the new bond debt, which it plans to pay off by collecting a $30 parcel tax for every $100,000 in assessed value  No bond money will be given to the Campbell Union High School District MEASURE BB: Sunnyvale Union School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Sunnyvale School District will be authorized to renew its existing $59 per parcel tax o The parcel tax will provide $1 million annually for seven years beginning July 1, 2018, with exemptions for senior citizens  Funds for school improvement  Money spent will be audited and reviewed by a citizens’ oversight committee  No funds will be spent on administrators  The parcel tax will not be renewed and Sunnyvale Union School District will not receive funding in this form MEASURE CC: Campbell Union School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Issues $72 million in bonds to improve school facilities and upgrade classroom equipment  Includes citizens’ oversight and financial audits of spending  No funds for administrator salaries  No bond money will be given to the Campbell Union School District MEASURE EE: Oak Grove School District
  • 9. County Registrar: (408) 299-8683 9 A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Oak Grove School District will be authorized to renew its existing $132 per parcel tax o The parcel tax will provide $3.1 million annually for nine years with exemptions for senior citizens  Money spent will be audited & reviewed by a citizens’ oversight committee  Funds spent on school improvement  The parcel tax will not be renewed and Oak Grove School District will not receive funding in this form  A Parcel tax is a form of property tax assessed at a rate based on the characteristics of a "parcel" (aka one chunk of the land), rather than on the assessed value of the whole property, which is the standard method of levying property taxes MEASURE GG: Los Altos School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Los Altos School District will be authorized to renew its existing $223 per parcel tax o The parcel tax will provide $2.8 million annually for eight years with exemptions for senior citizens  Funds spent on school improvement  Money spent will be audited & reviewed by a citizens’ oversight committee  No money spent on administrative salaries  The parcel tax will not be renewed and Los Altos School District will not receive funding in this form MEASURE HH: Franklin-McKinley School District A Yes Vote: A No Vote: Notes:  Franklin-McKinley District will be authorized to renew its existing $72 parcel tax o The parcel tax will provide $2.8 million annually for nine years with exemptions for senior citizens  Funds spent on school improvement  Money spent will be audited & reviewed by a citizens’ oversight committee  The parcel tax will not be renewed and Franklin-McKinley School District will not receive funding in this form