DILG MC 2002-150

DILG
Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF THE IT{TERIOR AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT
National Capital Region
Pasay CiW Field Office
August B, 2023
MARIA LOURDES L. AGUSTIN, CESO III
Regional Director
DILG-NCR
Thru ATTY. JEREMIAH T. SALAMERO
DILG NCR-Legal Unit
I.lear Dir. Agustin,
This pertains to the complaint against Punong Barangay Grace B. Corpus and Pasay City
Government for the alleged inaction on the complaint filed before the Business Permit
and Licensing Office [BPLO) -Pasay. This letter also refers to the related complaint dated
July 2L,2023 which was received by this level on luly 27 ,2023.
This level has coordinated the matter with PB Corpus and City Government of Pasay for
their reply on the above allegations.
Relative to the reply from the City Government of Pasay specifically from the Business
Processing and Licensing Office (BPLOJ- Pasay, the said office replied that tlen OIC Ciry
Administrator Cresalita I. Rey and BPLO OIC Ms. Michelle Talavera-pardo had talked to
the parties separately. Ms. Pardo commented that the complaint was subject for
inspection however the inspection did not push through because upon validation by the
inspection team, the issue was between the sublessor and sublessee. According to Ms.
Pardo, the parties concerned agreed to settle the issue among themselves. please see
attached letter reply of City Administrator Peter M. Manzano detailing the chronology of
events ofthe actions undertaken in response to the issues raised by the complainant.
"Matino, Mahusay, at Maaasahan,,
4th Froor. Room 414, **r.'y",:Fl'i,r;:31ii3oo*",F8 Harrison, Pasay city
Pasay.dilg@gmail.com I ncr.dilg.gov.ph
PB Corpus replied that series of scheduled meeting were conducted before the Lupong
Tagapamayapa and a certificate to file action was issued in favor ofthe complainant (See
attached Annex AJ. PB Corpuz has highlighted that the letter addressed to DILG Secretary
Benjamin C. Abalos, Jr. is a repeated complaint which was previously responded thereto
by PB Corpus to her letter to Mr. Enrique Pascual III [See attached Annex BJ. PB Corpus
also informed this level that criminal and civil cases lvere already filed in courl The case
for grave coercion, Rex Garbo and Florian R. Facundo vs. Wil John Sanchez, Carlos
Campos, and Michael Ong was recommended by the Office of the City Prosecutor for
dismissal for lack of probable cause last December 21,2027 (See attached Annex CJ.
Moreover, there were a notice to vacate and to pay money judgement and a writ of
executicn issued against the complainant by the Metropolitan Trial Court last July 14,
2023 and June 14,2023 respectively [See attached Annex D, D1-D2J.

-
Hoping to have addressed the complainant's concern.
Very truly yours,
fl*pr, (olo*n+
f,tarco A.G. Cabuefios
City Director
cc: Mr. Rex B. Garbo
"Matino, l,ahusay, at Maaasahan"
4th Floor, Room 414, Pasay City Hall, Pasadena Street, FB Harrison, Pasay City
Telefax: 833-1894
Pasay.dllg@gmail.com I ncr.dilg.gov.ph

l&eputrti [ia n q lSilipinas
Lungsod Ng Pasay, Kalakhang Maynila
TANGGAPAN NG TAGA-PANGASIWA
A7 August20?3
MARCO A.G. CABUENOS,IR
City Director
Deparhnent of the Interior Local Government
Dear Mr. Cabuenos:
This is in response to your letter of endorsement dated July 31., 2023, rcgarding the complaint of
Ms. Florian Facundo and Mr. Rex Garbo against PB Grace B. Corpus of Barangay 47,Pasay City
and Pasay City Government for the alleged inaction on the complaint filed before the Business
Permit and Licensing Office (BPLO)-Pasay.
Based on our records, below are the sequence of event and corresponding actions.
1. On March 09,2022, the Office of the City Administrator received a complaint letter from
Ms. Facundo and Mr. Garbo requesting a meeting with the then OIC City Administrator,
Ms. Cresalita Rey; the meeting happened on March 10, 2023. On the same day, the
complaint was endorsed to the office of the BPLO, and the OIC Head of BPLO commented
that the complaint establishment was due for inspection. On March 15,2023, OIC BPLO
Head commented ttnt the inspection did not push thru since, upon validation with the
inspection team, the issue was between the sublessor and sub lessee. Attached is a copy
of the complaint and routing slip for reference as Annexes "A" and " A:1".
2. On March 18, the OIC Head of Pasay City Barangay Bureau forwarded a copy of the
response letter from PB Grace Lucila Corpuz, Btgy M, regarding the same complaint,
referred to as LC :L42-2021,41-14. Accordingly, the Barangay called a meeting for personal
confrontation but failed; thus, a Certificate to File Action dated April 29, 20?3, was
received by Mr. Rex Garbo. Attached is a copy of the letter from PCBB as Annexes "B,"
"84" , and. "B-2" .
3. On July 31,,2023, the Office of the City Administrator received the endorsement from the
DILG regarding the complaint of Mr. Garbo and Ms. Facundo. The office endorsed the
letter endorsement to the concemed offices for comment.
4. On luly 3'1,,2023, BPLO submitted their comment to the Office of the City Administrator,
while on August Z PCBB forwarded the letter explanation of PB Grace Corpus. Attached
are their responses as Annexes "C" arrd"D."
Thankyou.
By the Authority of the City Mayor
. PETER MILLAN MANZANO
City Administrator
Office of the City Administrator
HSfr
-q r .'' 'j-u
IV u u'-a
CITY
.
DrLft+
t,UE T9 ?t?t
I.qTE -##t._#

gY:

rA {,N'
lt
Ttu [er
-v
lrw
1fr 0i
?q^*
A
U
tP
A&w'*;"Pe
rynlaxv"
- A't,
I
C,- fA^
t
b
u'W
h'
R
JL,;n-'^'!'
AnA
. -- li +;W#Sdry"
-rfrll J%: o,, - * oo .- ;
"'!{,'
(*/u " "*''.Qf;1',J_'^,i :
; ' 'tt,4Yr
riiriA,
-',
w ls^+
0t^
{f
S//^"
"f"rcd
L
Cq
,?^, I
,PI
f{,ofr,n"+
(we-
Tk^
ul-**l
b
I
f,T
{ t
I
,
1
I
(
yS'vwt
yllw
' "
Gjrtv-'
,t
a
4
7r
fl
A,/YA
r)
t,
Tr".4
10
cfi
d" q-k*-
'$*4,*-t
n
Lr
I
I
{
r{
llfi1"n
"1" '" "
I'Y{Tl
{l
'*,
)o )

{Ad+2o4
-
ri{t--* r
control No. CAdO 1940
Document Type: Memo
Notices
fnvitation
Subject:
OFFICE OF THE CIW ADMINISTRATOR
"Tapat kayong pilaglilingkutarr. "
@ ffie h
ROUTING
,
20 aays
s *
ru
?
Refferal
FROM:
Report
Proposal
Priority:
[-] Lette,
nothers
3 oayr 7 aays
Procurement Documents
DATE & TIME:
CONTACI NOS.:
<g 'G.t/ lLffl)vewue:
* n-nI-- 4t a* l,rrrrorT -- '
From To4 Due Date
Date Actions Required/lnstructions
3-1
v r{Sl,t,l
l'tvt^q
s?t-b-' ryf
h"fi'n Fto IotitN
I
t1o. fwh'ti. {r[E fYa/ U
Iht/w t{ t{n/|/.}'
tw !
,
lvw{wt
i
l-r lt
ilil*llr,,l
y ,wr
tm,
UWI| l, V W Yvr, r'
Wutt llx wL
p1tt ff4ilhy vbltttuth
Action Teken
!]rTE
6
Und€r sec. 5 RA 6713, Ethical Stand.rds for Public Officiah and Empficyees, enjoins all public servarts to respond to letteE, tel(
mr Et h. nr^.dca.l r^.1
^^hhlara.l
rr,ithih . r.i<^6ihl6 ei6a
4
(
,i ra/h({
I
u)
,Yt#/yi
T/
v Ar"vW
{,1 ,*, Z-
C-' u J
t
*h{r C+""k*-
t Arvlr
/l
i
a
{.-rty*'
qk*-
'$6lr*--e
{rf
rl
84,v-
/1
U
wr
{}
1o )

Pasay City, Metro Manila
Office of the Mayor
PASAY CITY BARANGAY BUREAU
*04
March 18.2022
HON, IMELDA CALIXTO.RUBIANO
City Mayor
Pasay City
Thru: MS. CRESALITA l. REY
Oflicer-in-Charge
City Administralor Offlcer
Respectfully foMarded to your good office copy of RESPOME letter from Barcngay
chairman GRACE LUCILA B. coRPUz, Barangay 17, zone 06. Relative to the concern lodged
with Presidential Complaint Letter LC-l 42-2021 -01 -1 4.
For your reference and update.
+--
drc - Community Affairs Officer lV
ENRI E S, PASCUAL III
Pasay City llatl Room 303 3'd lrloor i'.R. Harrison Strcet
Pasay City philippines

Republic of thc philippir,.,
@ffire of flrp purong garangar
l)istlirr ll, l)asay (fit1,. Mctrrr Manila
h- 1t,
TO
llr{(H l(, xo2L
I'ROM: Hon. Grace Lucila B, Corous
Punong Barangay
BW.+J Zonc-06
Pasay City
RE LC-142-2021-o1-14
Dear Sir ENRIQEE PASCUAL llt ,
PASAY CITY
r]ARANGAY BUREAU
( AOMIN SECTION )
_. -
Mv,w111est greetings , Sir, Enriqee. This regards on the letter of Direcror MARL0 s. GUAzoN.
Ph.D. of PUBLIC Affairs and communication Service , about the complaint ,f Mr. Rex H. Garbo
and Mrs. Florian Facundo to me regarding sa OBSTRUCTIoN of Business ( pag pADLocK ng
Negosyo ) bago po ang lahat marami pong salamat,
Sir-, ang nasabing reklamo ay agad po naming tinugunan , Nagpatawag kami ng pag-uusap sa
dalawang panig, sa unang patawag ay hindi po dumating ang Reipondeit , muli iL n"riirg.ii"ng
pimatawag,hindi na naman po dumating ang respondent nasina Mr. cARLos CAMpoSatMr.
MICHAEL oNc , nag -disisyon po ang MAY-SUMBoNG ( complalnant ) na humingi na lang sila ng
Certificate to File Action ( C.F.A ) After po ng sampung araw nila natanggap ang nasabing
Certificate to File Action ( kalakip po ng aming sagot ang kopiya ng kanilang C.F.A)
., 19 2'11"1*ttffi
')Af E:
flME:
NECEIVED BY:
Punong Barangay
Barangay 47,Zone 6, District 2
Pasay City
EURIQEE PASCUAI. III
Community Affairs OFFICER tV
Pasay City

f
I
OFFIGE OF r}lE LUN6I16 TAGAPAMAYAPA
*,"fiil'I#,Hl*,Jffi*",,,
,r*uffie-.i.ffiff,,,,,
"
ffffi
(pag_pADLOCf ng ruegpsyol
k"
UR.REK GARAO
UA. FIOnIAI| FACUrIX}
Complainant/ s
fRCARLOS CAf,NOS
UR. ECIIAEL OITG
Respondent/s
CERTITIC,ATE TO flLE ACIIOII
There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the
Punong Barangay but on the s* t""ri"J;"djii.ii.l.a,
-Against-
Attestcd by:
Hoa
l)
2l 'Iherefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in
court/ government olnce.
This z9$ day of Aert 2@r.
v.
gkat Secretary
B
gay
Rtx b G*Kbo
(*'?o -L0-Ll
2"
4

_ Republic otthe philippines
@ffice of tle Senggunieug 3ursngap
Bmgpy4Z, Z@ooe@6
l)istri<.t II, P:rsay City, Mctr<r Miurila
OFFICE OF THE TUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
ril xoflct oF HtAltxc
(IlDraflox DrocEDtxcr)
TO: MR.REXB. GARBO
FtORlAN R. FACUNDO
Complainant
ou are
2,J21
herebyrequiredloappearbetore meonthe 26th day of
at 5clsb=qk-in-thc_Aiterngan ,or the hearing of your
comptaint.
Ihis- 25rh d.ay o_f Mars[202t
Hon. B. CORPUT
Punong ngay
J"fl
Nolilied this 25'h day of March 2021 .
Complainant:
MR'.
Y
M:rch
MR' REx B' GIRBo Ra*fiG nefu^
^'
tRt. FLORIAN R. FACUNDO )fi"n*,-
K'l*"'
oEd

Republic of 6e philippines
@fiir? of Or Seirggryisrs 3armcap
_ gmomgry &o M@
l)rstrict II, pasay City, Mctro Manila
OFF'ICER'S RETURN
I served this summon upon respondent lrR. }flGr{AEL oNG on the
Respondent
I. Handling to him said summon in
person or
2. Handling to him said summon and
he refused to receive it, or
CtrAbl Or,;L
person of suitable age and
discretion residing therein, or
4. Leavirry said summon at his place
3. Leaving said surrunon
dwelling
at his
with
a
of business
l,if-L Jcttar l"' .|,+ilrA2>
competent in person in charge
thereof.
b*e<;-en-
with
a
Grqv 6
fficer
Received tative:
L 3 u
(Dote) .-ii,-.1.
G" ab
'^r

taa
r Republic of&e philippines .
@Eia_of tDc 5engmfifirg ilarengep
,-.PqgP"v ffi, d@6-
I)rstn<.t II, pasay
City, Metro n4mita
OFFICER'S RETURN
o* oli';'r"rffiffiiil', respondent
% tu
Respondent
l. Handling to him n*i flBro in
2. Handling to him said uunhnqpd
he refused to receive it, r:.
person or
3. Leaving said summon
dwelling
competent in
thereof.
person in charge
(Date)
person of suitable age
discretion residing therein, or
*t hh
wie
t a
4. Leaving said summon at his place
of business with
and
a
c..'
---l
fficer
Received by respondent/ representative:
$CTIEZ
L

Bryubliha ns $iliPina , f U"
Pamahalaang Lun gsod PasaY
TANGGArAN Nc PERDilSO at rA,C LLISENSYA SA NEGOSYO
(BUSINESS PERMITS & LICENSING OFFICE)
July 31,2A23
Eon. IIbIELDA *EMI' CALIXTO-RUBL{NO
Ciry Mayor
Pasay City
. PETER M. MANZANO
Administator
q3',l
rb,
ity
A
(:
Thru:
DearMayor Emi,
Greetings!
Lasr year, this oflice was in reoeipt of a complaint regarding the dispute between a LESSOR
carlos campos & Michael ong and LESSEE Rex B. Garbo. Apparently' the lessor decided to
pdlocked the property being ieased by the lessee due to non-payment of the rental fees in
rvhich the les*e claimed that lessor has collected money fronr them and prornised to process
their business permit which until now remained to be unprocessed' Ms' Cresalita I' Rey' then
the OIC City Adrninistrator.and the undersignett have talked to both prties separately'
per our appreciation of the disprte" this office has no jurisdiction over their concern. As agreed,
&ey will just be seuled among thernselves'
For your Honor's information.
Sincerely,
${ICIIELLf, VERA-PARI)0, MPA1
Officer-
$tsut
?d Flrvr Rrrrsn 20?- Pasav Chl' Halt BuildinS, F.B Hanison St.- Pasa-v Cirr--.. l3$0 M.M. Phil.
ti

spo
M Gmail Admin Omce Pasay City <pasay.caoffi ce@gmail.com>
Fwd: CADO3651
Pasay Clly <pcbbpasay@gmail.com>
To: Admin Office Pasay City <pasay.caoffice@gmail.com>
Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 4:31 PM
-
Fotwarded meSSage __-
From: Pasay Gfty <pcbbpasay@gmail.com>
Date: Mon , Aug 7 , 2023 al 2:14 PM
Subject: RE:CADO3651
To: Records Division Ofiice of the Mayor <recordsdivision.mo@gmail.com>, Admin Office Pasay City
<pasay. caoffice@gmail.com>
Good day!
Respectfully forwarded, Barangay 47 Punong Barangay Grace Lucila Corpus response
letter regarding the complaint of Mr. Florian Facundo and Mr. Rex Garbo, with
document tracking CADO365I.
Please see attached file for your reference, and we would like to request tle closure of
the aforesaid ticket since the current issue has been resolved.
Thankyou.
Please acknowledge upon receipt. Thank you
DISCLAII.4ER
This email and its attachments are confidential and are intended solely
for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments. you
must take no action based upon them, nor must you disseminate, distribute or
copy this email, Please contact the sender immediately if you believe you
have received this email in error.
:l BGY-{7{ESPONSE.pdf
5843K

*lx-(r-1r .
!r r
ntr
I il'
, 1. ''..t'
' -)r-.,!.
'*dr-i oo
Oo
Rtpuouc or lltr nllluPplNt s
tt'lllirr 0[ thr $arrggrrrruuts tl,rr';rrr[nrr
I r r-t'jlr'nFlilV () 7i s'i..'r.lr.e t..1
PASAY CIIY. MTIRO ITANIT.A
I ur'u.l ltll l
,'ASnY CIT Y
BARANGAY DI,IREAI'
( ADltlN SECTIoN )
AUO 0t ?0:).f LtV+r-'
0Ar 3:
lr,{t: t
t
rECG NEO BY:
l'1.'.rt ll l'.r,.rr.rl
llr tr.tr r.l rr'1.1r lrr lrrttl lt'ltlt rr'tllr 11r11111r1 rr,. ( .l).'.1 rl.rlrrl lrrlr ll
Irrrrlr,r..rr..rrr.rl l)l'llSlh,.rllt'1irlr,rr,.riluLrrlrrrlllnllrt'rrrtttpl,tttrllllrrll,r lt
.rrrrl t. I lrtn.rrt l.rr rrtt,lr, Jf:rtn'.1 lrlt (.rtlr..(.tttt1','..rrrrl Ilr lrrlrr. lt)rr!:
| )ll r. tlh.
lilr ( ..rt ltr
llt l.rr l, at lur r'nr rr, .. lrtrltrlrrl lt,'.tttltr'.. h lr,tr lh,' ( llltr r' ul llrr' I ttlrtrrl'. 1.r1.,.t1r.rr1r.11 .11,.1
.rntl .tllrr ttrrrlr.rlrr'tr l.rrlrrl, .r ( r.tltlr.rlr' lrr I tL lrltr,tt l,r lttrl ttr l,rrrrr r.l llrlrl lrttrl
rr.rtilri.rlr. t rt torhlilrrtrt !rrrtrtlr'lrl h'trttr'ltlttll: rrll. rrrltrltlrtltll ltlotu lltr'rortrl rulrl,rrrt
1ir
rTr'rrrntr'ttl rrl I lr r .lllrI i'. lrt'tr'lrt rllrr lhl .l /lllrr' r'
I hrrtllr', tht. rtnrlt.rrtl'.ntl rlrr'..rr tlurl lrt'r trlltrr' . .tr liirtl rrtl tlrr' r r,tttpl.rtttl n ht trrrtlt.tlr.
llrt. tt.r1111r' trrlrllrclutl: lnh'tr'h lturu.rrrl hr tlt,' 1..,,.t,,ttr1'..rrr1i l'.rtttlrrt.rttl',.rt l.n..r
.rnr ntlrrl I'r' li,'l'rrltlrr rr l Nr' 7l t{l r,llrr'nr tx' Itttr,tr tt .rr lltr' I r .tl (;.r i l ttltti'ttl ( rr[. rrl
I
(rll
l'rlthlr, it ir tlrt. (rpinion rrl lhr. rttxh'ni1..rrrrl th.rl lttt rtlltrr' trrt lt,tr!:t'r lt.tr lultrlt, lrrrrt trt r't
thc crrmfl.rinl .rr lrlr (i.rrlrr.rnrl l1. l'.trutxh. .rltritrlr lilrrl .t rrtnt|l.lilrl h'trrrt llrr'(ltr'r'
rtl ttrr' Cilr Prrr-rr ltrt r.l l'.tr.tt ( rlr rr ltt.rt tltr. rttrrr' lr.t .lllf.rrll ttw'lr'rrl l.r llt' r.rtrl
rrllirr. trn lh..'r.nrh.r ll, flll. A e(r|l'rrl thr. rt'rrrltrlirrn rrl lhr(Illtr'ol lhr't ll lrhr'ulirt
ol P,rrtr'('ill i ht'rr'llr .rll.rt'lrrrl .l ' ,nnt' ("
I rn.rltr., ltrr, t.rq. h.lrrrr.n Nt.rrLlttr.rtr Ll.rtnr. 'r'trlttn'.. ltr. tr'lttr-r'trlrrl I'r' ilr Alhrrllt'r 'ltl'
l'.rtl. Carhx R Lanrl.r^ relrsr !ir1 l'krri.rn l'.rt'tttrtlrr .rnrl ll'r (i.rttrr .rntl .rll F'rw,rt'.
r.l.tintinl; ti1',htr.rntt rnl*rr.rl ull('r lhr.rtr lutr l,.rrttttr'llnrl .rrxl r'rtltr!l rrtltt rtl lh.'
irrf icc io ).rc.rfr..rntl l'.rr. !trrnt'r. f urllinu.nt rl.rlrrl tulv lt. :tll, ltrrt lrl I utrtlir'tr tl.rltrl
ils?gl
GElcu-s"*n".
I
t
ltt.l,Nt{tQUt s. t.As('trAt ill
('(.rttn [lrtr ..ll.rrr. tlr.r t lv
I'.rsrr ( ttt ll.rr.rn,:,rr llrrtr.rrt
t ourlhlr, llrr. .tlh.llrllorr lrr llh' L.lk'r r.l lt ( l.rrlr, .llrl llr l .tt'rtttrl,' rl.rlrrl ltrlr I Jl.rt
.rdttr,-.r..t h, t lr,n [r'ni.rnritr ( .lrrlrx, lr r...r trr,'Ir.tr.lt,t..lt t,l llt,'tr .tllr'1:.rlr,tttr rrrnl.luh.il
tn th.r tr.llt.r lo lhr. Irr'rrrh'rrlr.tl t r'rrrl.l.rrrrl (i.nltr rl.rlrrl l,'l'nt.rlt lt, lttll, rrlrt, lr lhr.
rtntttni;ntrl .rtrr.ltlr rr'lut(ltl rttt l'ttr lr llt, lltll r r'trltl rrl lltr'rrttl h-'lrll!'lt ttt'rr'lt'
.r tlrchr'tl ,rs '' rtltlr' ll-

OFFICE OF THE LURONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
2
XN"RET OARBO
f8. FI.oRIAJI FACT'TTDO
Complainant/ s
-Against-
XR. CARII)S C"AIPOS
XR. XICHAEL OI|O
Respondent/s
r)
Attested
CERTIFICATE TO FILE A TION
r 9 G*Kbo
t+-?o -zazl
There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the
hrnong Barangay but on the Stt hearing mediation failed;
2l lherefore, the conresponding complaint for the dispute may now bc fited in
court/ government olfice.
This zgs day of AoriL 2(Il1.
Secretary
Ra
!P con,s."n,r".
Bnrangay Casc No. P$Y'DROA'?1U17
For: OBBTRUqnOI| OP BUaIfEgtl
(Pog-PADLOCK ng NegosYo)
I

Republic of the PhilipPines
Department ol Justice
Natlonal P rosecutlon Service
OFFICE OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR
Pasay CitY
finnrx, 0
REX GARBO ANd FLORIAN R.
FACUNDO,
Complainants
- versus .
WtL JOHN SANCHEZ 1 , CARLOS
CAMPOS and MICHAEL ONG,
Respondents.
l.S. No. XV-1 3JNV'21'F-00598
For: GRAVE COERCION
rties setting
Meantiine,
Date Filed
Date Received
Date submitted
SUb-iioenas'
investigation on Jt
: June 04, 2021
: June 14,2021
: July 19,2021
RESOLUTION ,
This resolves the complaini of Rex Garbb;a'nd' Florian Facundo for grave
coercion against Wet John Sanchez, Carlos Campos and Michael Ong.
were sent'to the pa
uly 05 and 12,2021
the schedules lor preliminary
fespond6ntS-asked and were
granted additional 'Period to' file their sidering that the
preliminary investigation of this case coi in'e of government
mandated lockdown due to the Prevalence of the Covid-19 Delta variant. After the
submission of the joint counter-affrdavit, the case was submitted for resolution
The facts appear as follows:
Complairiants averred in their Pinagsamang Sinumpaang Salaysay ng
Pagreieklamo that they started renting a unit at 301 Buendia St., cor LRT Station,
Pasay City on October 15,2020 to last until October 31, 2021. Another lease mntract
to rent'a seiohd unit was made on November 15, 2020 to last untilNovember 15, 2021
was subsequently entered into. These rented units were used for the purpose of selling
clothes at their shop called F&R RJ Co. and it doubles as thelr dwelting place, for a
monthly rental fee of P130,000.00. On an dndisclosed datez, complainants lefl to
alend,the wake of a deceased relative and when they came ba.ck on March 19, 2021,
in.y n.rUrg tiiiprised to find out that their units were aiready padtocked.
gomgllqnants then went immediately to respondent Wel John Sanchez, the
, Respon'deni'ivei[& lrlirieti loini touriter-Atfidavtt ihar his narhe ii actuaily rpelLd as willbh]iSancher
r See lt.tn 6d.'5 of the ,'
1:1..t1 i,-r"
ni .1"
I
I
I
I
i
GElcu.oscanner
t
I
'-rl'r 'it:
, r , il.'.''.,
I

I
2
x-ry-:--
guarL on duty,
-....*:....a..*
snd asked who caused
answerod thot he moroly took tho
Campos. The follorring clay, Morch 20,
told lhem that he lusl heeded the orde
respondent Michael Ong, Aggrieved,
l,Ye norv resorye
Probable cause, for the purpose of filing a crirninal information, has been
defined as such facts as are sufficient to engender a well-founded belief that a crime
has been committed and that respondent is probably guilty thereof. The term does
not mean "actual and positive cause" nor does it import absolute certainty, It is merely
based on opinion and reasonable bellef. Probable cause does not require an inquiry
into whether there is sufficient evidence to procure a conviction. It is enough that it is
believed that the act or omission complained of constrtutes the offense charged.3
Parenhetically, part of the public prosecutor's duty to determine if there exists
a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed, and that the suspect is
probably guilty of the same, is the corollary findings that the elements of the crime
charged should, ln all reasonable likelihood, be present. Thls ls based on the principle
that every crime is defined by lts elements, wlthout whlch there should be, at most,
no criminal offense.4Thus, for grave coercion to lie, the followlng elements must be
present;.
1. That a person is prevented by another from doing something
not prohibited by law, or compelled to do something a$alnst his rvill,
(p cu-s"unn".
'l r: '- '
,r, rr. lr
.,o, xv-i3.lNV-2t.F-oosod
.ESOUUTION
il" .
1..'
lr
I
I
For their part, rospondents mainlblnld lhdt lho inslanl complaint is nothing but
sn sltempt lor the complainanls to prolong thoir Blay at tho subi€ct units despita lheir
tailure lo pay the monthly rentals, Bs inrfoct, o coso lor oieclmenl has already been
liled belore the courl. Lik6wiso, lho rospondonts, who not only strongly denied, but
also described as labricotod, hoarsay and self-serting thc complainsnts' allegation in
their P,nagsamrng Sinumpaang Salaysoy ng Pagrereklomo that l /el John Sarrchez
allegedly told them that he only acled on the orders of Carfoi Campoi, who in turn,
merely followed lVlichael Ong's inslructions. They also asserled thal the photographs
of the padlocked units do not cloarly dopict that what has been padlocked were the
units leased by the complainanls and thst it cannot prove lhat those padlocks vrere
indeed placed st the time when they were nol allegedly in lhe premises. They also
csnnot be said to have been prevented from doing something not pfohibited by the
law or has allegedly compelled them to do something against their will considering thai
they are still ocrupying lhe leased premises and operaling their business up to the
present. Finally, they claim that the case against Wel John Sanchez should be
dismissed in light of the fact that he was not even included in the impleaded
respondents in the Certificate to File Action.
of
before the Barangay but no settlemenl
imrhodiatsly had the incident blotterecl
agreod upon, h6nco, lhi3 Complainl.
t tenequrto ii.ll vr. Very.r. G.R. No. 172829 luly 18, 201?
.lbd .r- :..,, r , I
l';'.,,

,,i,0,,,ii
'','.,1,
rr';:: -r.,')l,. rii
,:Y ir1;11 i. '.1,.' :'ii'l r' l-'. '-
I
' rt1
lr{
ti
! ['r' .'
,. i" ,'
olence,
another
made
3
.
' Perusal of the t tnagsom arlg iinumpeang Saloysay ng pagrercklamoshcn /ed
thatlhe complainants filed lho inBtant caso for grave coircion upon the existence of
the follo[ing elemonts as avonod in th€ vorndOular, yilr
a. "Komt a1' pntigild rrg nrya nasablng too'hd pumosol sa amrng
itru1pahang pux'csto ot dahil clito uy hindi kami maalas na
nakapagtinda at mokapaghonap buhuy at dahi! drttt iy wata
koming kinita:
b. Ang papigil sa amin na pumasok M aming puwesto at ,ruginda
or nughonap buhay ng maayos ay ginawa sa pamamogitan ng
pagtodlock sa omitg puv'esto; al
c. Malinaw na walang karapatan sina WIL JOIIN SANCHEZ (sic),
CARLOS CAIPOS at MICIIAEL ONG na gawin ito Eapagk(n
walo silang-hawak na kaulusan ng Korle na pinapayagon tiiang
gawin ito.'6
The case went.turther and explained that,"[T]here is lntimidation when one of
the parties is compelled by a reasonable and well-grounded fear of an imminent and
gftlve evil upon his person or property', or upon the person or property of his spouse,
descendaht!'oi ascendants, to give his consdnt.iMateilal violence ls not indispensable
l/') rl,i.' t',
! Ph.i€ lecdoil l oltha Ph.tlamrtf, ShumPa|IB Salay3.v rB P.8r?tellm.o
a
G.R. Io,U9?41 Seprember 7,2011
I
in t'r ' :
[pcu.s"u*".
' Io. nl.l f iNV-zl''Fb0s98 ; '
ESOLUTION
I
il
rll '
,l
I
i
Il
'
:o ..li'
'rl
be lt rlght or wmng;
2. rllat the of compulsion ls J
threaB or lntlmldatton; and
3. That the p€Gon restrains thc wlll liberty
has no rlght to do so, or ln ,wotds, that the
under authorlty of law or ln exerclse of any rlqht,
A simple reading of the same.shows that the complainants merely alleged (t)
padlocking the complainants' rented unit which prevented them from retfinq
-clotti"l
and (2) that the persons who allegedly caused the padlocklng has no autlro-rity frorn
the court to do so, Conspicuously, there was no allegation pertaining to the seconO
element or how the prevention or compulsion was effected (rie, with Molence, threats
or intimidation).
- .In the case of Joseph Anthony Alejandro, et. al vs. Atty. Jose Bernas, et
al.5,,the complaint fur grave coercion was dismissed fur slmilarly. failing to allege ihat
the fact of padlocking and cutting off of facilities to prevent the petitioners from
entering the subject unit were effected by violence, threat or intimidation. While the
intimidation due to the presence of.the guards was belatedly alleged by the petitioner,
the Supreme Court nevertheless ruled that under the obtaining circumstances there
was still no intimidation that took place which would warrant the indictment of the
respondents for grave coercion.
,
. - l
,ir

MEMORANDUM
TO ALL PASAY CITY BARANGAY OFFICIALS
SUBJECT SURVEY ON SMOKE-FREE ENVIRONMENT POLICY
DATE 14 JUNE 2023
This refers to the letter of Atty. ROMANO S. MARTES, Acting Chairman, Metro Manila
Development Authority (MMDA) dated May 3c, 2023, about the implementation of "The
Tobacco Control Program" which is in line with their mandate regarding Health and
Sanitation, Urban Protection and Pollution Control, according to RA 2942.
To assess the impact of the program and to further enhance the implementation of the
Smoke-Free Environment Policy, they are requesting to be allowed to survey the stores and
households in all barangays of Pasay City.
Relative thereto, may we respectfi:lly request for them to be allowed to conduct the mentioned
activity and to assist them in any way possible.
For your information and appropriate action.
By Authority of the City Mayor:
PETERM. MANZANO
City Administrator

?flnl thr't ttlbjlct 0lI(!{ Ii
.'Oll
lll
nrdatiotl titl! lo lrt' 1" t
' fllc Uuurur
r/oil$/.!0.1NY.11*00598 :
SO,lilunf lprN,ri r, i ,
r.l
rt i'f
*-I--
t'4
,(
I
(tlilcIt.. {, )i
uccd ln the mlnd uairiiwhicn
ent," Moredve In the drirne of grave
,,J
x
r,
such a display of It as r/ould produce
r the wlll of the offende4. party 15 an
To restate, even on the pain of fnf repettuous, tneie wa5 no allegauon how
the Padlocklng was even effccted thus crE can be no grave coercion under the ob-
taining circumstances of the lnstant c Moreover, the fact that the complainants
were able to talk to Wel John Sanchez a d dlrectly contacted Carlos Carnpos after the
ngt hd
nverse I
fact only showed that they werc midatcd by or feared these people because
they can easily and peacefully co wi$ them. With that, we s€e no cornpelling
reason why this case must not suffer the sdme demise as that of the cas€ of Jmeph
Anthony Alejandro, et. al vs, AttY. Jose Bernas, et al, whlch the Supreme Court no less
pronounced that the failure to allege the existence of the second element is fatal'
Lastly, considering the above-disqulsition, an exhaustive dlscussion on whether
the ose agalnst wel John sanchez should be dismissed for not havlng been lmpleaded
GElcu.s"unn",
;
I
I
rl
'i..1' l;' '; i
I
I l:
i.
I
rilct lr
there-dd & tntlmldittdrr: IhtdBd
or hlnders the exercise ofthc
vlolence thmugh materlal
' Ibid
t Sc.- ptcfllory.stltGme rndio,3 ofthC rnagrmrrg Stnunipban0 iat.n.t ng prSterellmlo Ir
.,i - I
(
Also, while drere was an allegation pertaining to the first element, the fact that
even after Urls case was lnstihrted, the complalnanE are Still residing or utilizing as
their mailinq address "3Ol Euendia St., cor LRT Station, Pasay City' as can be seen
in their Prnigsam ang Sinumpaang Salaysay. nE Pagrere4lamos, only lends credenc€
to the respondenls' claim that they iannot be said to have been prevented from doing
something not prohibited by the law or has allegedly compelled them to do something
against their will considering that they are still occupying the lsesed premises and
operating their business up to the present.
More importantly, it must be emphasized that the affidavit of the complainant,
or any of his witnesses, shall allege facts within thelr (afiianE) personal holvledge.
In this case, the assertion of the complainants that they were allegedly told by Wel
lohn Sanchez that he padlocked the units based on the orders of Carlos Campos,
whom they later on called only to be told that he only followed the lnsEuctions of
Michael Ong ls certainly hearsay. Notably, these allegations werc vehemently denled
by the alleged source of the information or no less than Wel John Sanchez and Carlos
Campos, respectlvely, in their Jolnt Gounter-Affidavit. It ls an elementary prindpte that
. mere allegation ls not.evidence and is'not equlvalent to proof, thuswe cannot glve
credence to the complainants'claims and proceed with indicting the respondents on
the strength alone of this allegation lest rve would be faced vyith the risible scenarh
where the complainanty would have to call as wltnesses the respondents to prove
their case'agalrfs therfas thelrunly evidence to prove'thd respondents, partictpauon.
in thls case'was their own so-crlled admlssion to the fact that they caused the pad-
locking ofthe sltbject unit.
llt
t' ' ;i
ll f rr

t 0 tlrc r:rln,rrlirirr::!.r!t' cllllrr-, a, r
I
!
I
i' ll i:. lJlruLttrr v,,
.1,., !,-i,rlat'{;
a 1,. ,7,-tj r
, t .-t t.. 11 -
'l , t' t'l ,:
' t !, )
lr alon
S L
ir irl tl,i, -i1,. .,. i I ,
l3JNVi2t.h.0089t.,,,,
,.Trl o,t{ , i
5
lil
rn
t.,
':r( ')
I
barangay conclliatiOn urould only be an exercise
the cnse for reve crarclon against WEL
S bnd I$ICHAEL is recomm€ndec
!l
MELVIN UI/lALI
Arsistant Cily Proseculor
IBP
Rollof Attorneyr No. 0Ct692
PPLM Llfetime No. 074959102-2r-^19
f MCLE Exemption No. V-00 1 503$4-1 4-22
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
(Per No..6-A, S. of 2021)
SERAFIN
Chief,
,' (.
copy
1
2
City Prosecutor
B
APPROVED Bi AUTHORIW
OFTHE CITY PROSECUTOR:
(Per Office Order No, 6-A, S, of 2021)
ASAS
Deputy Prosecutor
No. VI-0015243
MCLE Complia
Valid UntilApril 14, 2022
' .:
F6rnlshdd:
/Rbx CatUo and Florlan Facundo - 301 Buendla St., cor LRT Statlon, Pasay Gity
Wel Jottnsanchez, Carlos Campos and Mlchael Ong -allclo One Buendia Food
,PlaiblS6n; Gil Puyat Ave. corner Taft Avenue, Pasay Cl$
,rl'1.,
I
I
I
I
ft!;li:{.(r'J
,_!i: Tl'l[: (
a
,1
t'
I
$p cu-scanner
:
a(
,l
I r".i'l;
i ; ll
aS one of the respondents durlng
,in tutillty.
1't
Senior

m?
7 &r'rg-DD,-D,
RePublic of the PhiliPPincs
Nalional CaPilal Rcaion
METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURT
Branch 167, PasaY CitY
Emrn: metc I plylQl@tu!-clarygsvr! -.--
conba numbcrl o) c!t'tt'og I (toU 95926t6107
c
s
rr
.a
tli
at
icr
:lr
3I
Jt
It
MARKETTIAN GAME VENTURES,
lNC. Rep. by ltr Attorney-ln-Frct,
Carlos R. Campor
Plalnlifl/s'
.versus- Clvil Case No: M-PSY-2'l-01101-CV
FoT: UNLAWFUL DETAINER
SPS. FLORIAN FACUNOO and REX
GARBO and ALL PERSONS
CLAITTIING RIGHTS AND INTEREST
UNDER THEM,
DefendanUs.
x------ -------------x
NOTICE TO VACATE AND PAY MONEY JU GM NT
D E
TO: SPS. FLORIAI{ FACUNDO and REX GARBO and ALL PERSONS
CLAIMING RIGHTS AND INTEREST UNDER THEM
- Buendia 1, Pasay CityCode I and Buendia 1 Code 9 of one
Buendia Food Place located at No. 301 Sen. Gil Puyat
(Buendia) comer Taft Avenue, Pasay City
GREETINGS:
By virtue of the Order dated 14 June 2023 issued by HON' SHEILA
MARIE V. SISONJAVIER, Presiding Judge, and the Wril of Execution issued
thereafter, copies of which are attached hereto and served upon you, and you are
hereby DIRECTED to peaceably VACATE the leased premises identified as
Buendia 1, Code 8 and Buendia 1 Code 9 of One Buendia Food Place located at
No. 301 Sen. Gil Puyat (Buendia) corner Taft Avenue, Pasay City within ten (10)
calendar days and to PAY the following money judgment to plaintifi, to wit:
'1. the amounts of: (a) Four Hundred Eight Thousand Twenty
Pesos and twenty-ono cenhvos (?408,020.21) representing
the unpaid renlals as of 20 April 2021: and (b) Thlrty Thousand
Pesos (P30,000.00) and One Hundred Thousand Pesos
(P100,000.00) per month as renlals for Buendia 1, Code 8 and
Buendia 1 Code 9, respectively, commencing on 20 May 2021
up to the time that defendants finally vacate and deliver the
leased premises to plaintiff, plus interest on the said amountd at
the rate of six percent (60/o) per annum, lo be computed from 15
February 2021,hhe date of judicial demand, until full payment;
2. the legal interesl on the interest due on the unpaid rentals,
accruing as of judicial demand which shall be (6%) per annum
from the lime of judicial demand until fully paid; and
!pcu.s"unn",

{

W*!,W:^# *,W,W r, b
^tuLrffi
d' -ffi'.n'
c@r t,s
sps.a-oilrrviiiiiiio-iJ7ri*itiJlioi'naeupthsolrscr- nN,Rto,ttsttP,NrEnEstUnPERtHEu
CMI C!r. r{o.t*psf.2l Oll 0l -CV
3. tho omount of Trv.nty Thourlnd P..ol (P20,000.001
attomoy'r leed, plur legrl lntorcrt thonon rt lh' ttte of 6%
per ennum to Ui computeo lrom lhe linelity ol this O,,ecision
until lull paymenl: and
Failure to do so, the underulgnod hal no allemati"o bd to resod to
lorcible actionr under lh€ law lo implem€nt the eald wdt of Executirn.
Pasay CilY, Motro Manlla
14 JulY 2023
eawcffi1,m. PAREDES
4. the cost of suit,
Received copy:
. $t{a
,3
Copy Fumished:
ATTY. ANGEL P. VERMAS / ATTY. JULIE KAREN U. PAGANA'E
Delcndant'8 Counsel
iuuiic Anomeys omc€. 4n Floor, Hall of Justice Bldg., Pasay city
ATTY- SANCHO M. FERANCULLO
Plaintfs Counsel
Room 206, C. K. Sy Oiamond Bldg., No. 156 Libertad $.' Pasay City
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE URBAN POOR (PCUP}
'1514 Ouezon Ave., Oiliman, Ouezon Cily, Metro Manila
PASAY CITY'S URBAN OEVELOPMENTAND HOUSING OFFICE
Pasay City Hall, Pasay City
CHIEF OF POLICE
NCRPO
RHO Bldg., Camp Bagong Oiwa, Lorrer Bhrtan, Taguig City
THRU he Otrrco o, Chiet of Polic€ Operations
F. B. Hanison St., &rgy. 70, Pasay City
EARANGAY CHAIRPERSON
Brgy. 4F Pasay City
!f,lco,ns.unn.,
+AA,^

f
Republic of the PhiliPPines
National CaPltal Region
Branch 167, Pasay CitY
Emsil: metc'l Dsvl 87@iudiciarY.oov'o!
contacl numbcr: (+83)9565070902(8)8.l r 109
MARKEUAN GATIIE VENTURES,
lNG. Rep. by ltr Attomey-ln-Frct,
Crrlor R. Crmpor
Plalntitrs,
-venlus- Civll Case No: M-PSY-21{1101-CV
For: UNIIWFUL OETAINER
SPS. FLORIAN FACUNDO rnd REX
GARBO end ALL PERSONS
CLAI]{]NG RIGHTS AND INTEREST
UNDER THEM,
Defendants.
x------ -------x
WRIT OF EXECUT]ON
TO: PR]NCE BENIDICT M. PAREDES
MeTC, Branch 167,
GREETINGS:
WHEREAS, a Decision dated 29 November 2O21 was rendered in this case,
the dispositive portion of which reads as follows:
"WHEREFORE, p/€mirss corsdeGd, thts @lttt E,rdia's judgmena in tawr ot
daintifr ttARXEnEN GAfrE yEfrrURES, ,lrc., t€ptlsorrtld by tb Afiomcy-
tn-F.clC.tto. R CafiPos, against defierdanls SPS. FLORIAN FACUNDO ,nd
Rg oARBO, .nd .ll pa!,oas cl.tmtng dgh.! under t
'6,m,
ordoting tha tatter
1 . to VACATE the ,aasad pr€mises ida ntified as Buerd/ia 1 da I end
Buerctia lcpdo 9 ot Ond Buendle F@ct Placa ,ocaled 8f Aro. 30,
Sen. Gil PWt (Buendia) comer Taft Awnues, Pasay Clty, end to
DELIWR iB peacf.ful ?€ssessbn to plainfifr
2. to PAY plaintifi the amounts ol: (a) Four Hundnd Elght ltousrad
f$anty P.ro, and lw.ny-oa. ctatryor (Ft.or,O2O.2l)
|Bprcsanling the unpeid Bntals as of 20 Aptil 2021; end (b) Ihhty
fhou.aad Pcg,ot (2r0,0N.00) aN On Hundt d llrosstad
pcto, (n00,N0.00) par mont,, as ,onto,s W Buadia I Codo I
end tuendia lode 9, EsFc{ively, @mrtsnchg on 20 May 2021 up
to the tiffD that defendants fina y vacf,,te aN doliwr t ro ,€as€d
prcmisos to plelnt l, p,us ,nter€st{ on tho sai.d arnounts at,te rate o,
s1v 96rcenl (5 ) D.,t .nnum. to bo @mquted l.,c/m 15 June 2021 , the
dala ol ludiclal domand, until lull P.ymcnt;
3. to Pay plaintifi logal lntercst on ahe intoc,sl dua oo tho unpau rDnhrs
a@rulw as ol ldidal &mad wtich sio,, Do s,k porDont (d,q pr
annum lrcm lhe tlme ot ludlclal d€n€,l,d untit tully pat<t:
Ccil,Tllt3IE
OYAT{ R.
Cle* cf Ccurt
1. to pAY ptslntill thc emount d rufiNry rHousArvo pEsos
(n0,0@.@) as atwnot's ,bes, plus ,oga, ,nto,rst lrrerDo, at dre ,atB
TR,UT COPY
-PASCUAI
137, P,-'r:V
MeIC, Bmndr
!pcu.''s.uno".

WRIT OF ExEcu*t*
Markeman Game Ventums, lnc. vs.
Florien Facundo, et el.
'Civil
Case No. M-PSY-21-0ll0l-CV
CERTTTTTE b CUt,,r
DYAN R. PASCUAT
Ueft, Bnndt
2
of 0?{ W snnum lo Do oonprdad frottt frio linallty ol thi, Decison
untflfull poymnl ond
5. IoP Ytfi.oortsdauil.
SOORDEREO'
VrllEREAS, on 21 December 2}21,the Court granted the plaintiffe Motion
hr Execttion.
NQWTHEREFORE, you are hereby mmmanded to causo the execution of
the aforesaid Decision; to lovy the goods and chatlels of the defendanls 3PS.
FLORIAN FACUNDO rnd REX OARBO end ALL PERSO}|S Cl-AllllNG
RIGHTS AND INIEREST UNDER THEII ol One Buendlr Food Pleee locetod
at No. 301 Sen. Gll Puyrt (Buendle) comsr Trft Avenuet, Prcry Clty except
those whlch arc exempt fnom execution; and to make the earne thereof in
emrdancewith the procedure laid down in Rule 39 of the Revisod Ruhs of Cq,rt,
and in sudr cases made and provided, together with all your lawful feeg for the
service of this writ.
ln case sufficient personal property of the defendant cannot be found to
satisfy $e amount of said Decision, you are hereby direc'ted to levy the real
property of the said defendants and to sell the same or so much thereof in the
manner provided for by law for the satisfaction of the said Decision.
You are directed to make a return of your proceedings pursuant to Section
14, Rule 39 of the 2019Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.
WITNESS, the HON. SHEII-A MARIE V. SISONJAVIER, Presiding Judge
of this Court, this 14s day of June 2023, at Pisay City, Metro Manila.
t
tl
DYAN R. LLAIUIAS.PASCUAL
Clerk of Court lll
{l
{i
Clerk cf Court
167, Pasay
EElcu-scanner

National Capital Judicial Region
Branch 167, Pasay Cfi
Emiir: motcl psv 1 07@iudiciarY.oov.oh
Conted numbrr (+03)90C2018.l07(E)E3llt09
ITARKEISAN GAIIE VENTURES,
lNG., rep. by ltr Attorncyln-Frct,
Cerlor R. CtmPor,
Plainlitr,
-versus-
Rosanb Y.
lr. Cvr,
PASCUAL
MpTF Rranrh
SPS. FLORIAN FACUNOO rnd REX
GARBO, rnd ALL PERSONS
CI.AITING RIGHTS AND INTEREST
UNOER THEM.
Defendanls.
x------ --------x
ORDER
For resolution is the Motion for Execution filed by plaintiff, throtqh counsel,
on 09 June 2023 which seeks the issuance of a Writ of Execution to implement the
Decision dated 21
'November
2021.
Let the records show that the Regional Trial Court, Branch 118 of Pasay
City (appellate court) rendered a Decision dated 26 July 2022 affrming this courts
Decision dated 29 November 2021. On 30 August 2022, delendants-appellants
filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the appellate court's Decision, whbh was
denied in ttie Order dated 05 December 2022. On 01 April 2023, an Entry of Final
Judgment was issued by the Clerk of Court of the appellate courl. ln an Order
dated 15 May 2023, the appellate e,ourt remanded the recods of the instant case
to this court for the execution of the final and executory Decision. On 25 May 2023,
this court received the records of the instant case.
lndeed, the remand of the appellate court of the records of the instant to this
court for the execution of the final and executory Decision is in accordance with
Rule 39, Sec{ion 1, of the Rules of Civil Procedure, whictt provides:
Sectlon l. Execution upon iudgments or final orders.
- Execution
shall issue as a matler ot dght, or motion, upon a judgment or oder that
disposes of the action or proceeding upon tho expiration of the period to
appoal therefrom if no appeal has been duly perfecled.
lf the app€al has been duly p€rfected and ftnalty rs3olved, the
execution may forthwith be applied for in the court of origin' on motion of
th6 judgment oblig€€, submitting therewilh certified true copios of the
judgment or judgments or final order or orders sought to bc cnforcad and
of the cr ry thcrcot, urlth notlcc lo the advcrso pttly.
Thc.ppoll.t court m.y, on motlon ln the ..me c.!c, hfhon th.
lntc?olt or lu.tlcc !o t!qul]r!, dl?.ct th. court ol orlgln to l!!uc thc
wlt ot crocudon.
Significantly, in Marcial Varyas and Engr. Raymundo
csliTl[tE
DYAN R.
Clert of Coufi
!pcu,,s"uno".
Civil Case No: M-PSY-21.01'l0t'CV
For: UNL{WFUL OETAINER

Foilunalo cajucom,t the supreme couil herd trat oncc th6 iudgrr.nt bocornes
final, the prevailing party l8.enilfled a! r m8flor ol rtght to r wn
-or
cxcartim. rtl
issuance is, in hct, the trial.court'r mlnlrterial d,rty,
-ttrc
only lrmitrrion bcirp thrt
the wdt must conlorm subrtanttally to.cyory es$;riiet pad[ubr of f,c iudg-mont
p.q!fg:l{,L11. parilcutady, rhe orden dr occrcei rn thc dbpoarivc
'wirln
a
the dessron' runhermore, lhe ourt held thet wen the lrcuirp ii aucyencc a up
issuance of a writ of execution ol a frnal and oxecutoryluogmfi cen # *ou.rx
abuse of discretion on the pa( of the tdel court.
Taking into account thet the appeoled Dscicirm har becornc finat and
executory, the issuance of a Writ ol Execution is proper.
'iiinanFacundo, gl al-'--"""' ''
ctuit case No. [&PSY-21-0 1101-cv
SO ORDERED.
14 June 2023
Pasay City
@p, tum *tC:
f gr Flolrd ra.rlcr:
Aty. Angrl P. Vartllrr, Att . Ju[t Ktnn U. P.grnrl'
Atomqr't OiiE. Hdl ot Justicr. Prray C Y
SHEILA s
STNSJ.DIP
-WHEREFORE,
plaintifls Motion for Exscutbn is hereby GRANTED. Let a
Wril of Execution be issued based on the appealed Decirion iald2} November
2021. The Sherifi of this court is DIRECTED to lmplement this Order.
The Philippine National Police and/or the concemed law enforcers are
requested and directed to extend and.provide the necessary assistance in the
implementation of the Writ in accordance with law.
W
MARIE ISONJAVIER
Judge
rtr. &lrho X. tannculo
ffi,*ffirH**.H'
rh 15' un'rld st' Fr$v c,'tv
fldai fsurlo
Lffifi; r- *' lor '
s'n' G{ P.,n Glxndr} co'' t Av! '
P'tryc'v
id Crto
Hfr*,. r*
''o'
*o !01' 6.lt' G PuYd (oll'idL) clt r Aw' P' v c'v
Pubrc
Er6il
fo. ndtrld ttt.il:
IJtrnan crrm Ysntra' xE. (R'g' r': c'r'lo' R' c596)
ff$r. s.n. on p',Ivtt tgG'iit) cot Ttn^v! P.r'v ctv
Enail:
CgRTIET''
OYAN R.I
Clelkof C
1071Pas1
r n e ua tltrni ?? &t!' 2015.
I
I

/v
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
@ftice of 0e $uuquniung @urungu,
Boramgoy +Ze Zom@ Oo
PASAY CITY, METRO MANILA
By way of reply to the 1st Indorsement with CTrI 20'2i-L-07-002dated July 31, 2023 sent by
your good office, the undersigned DENIES the allegations of inaction on the complaint
filed by Mr. Rex Garbo and Ms. Florian Facundo against Mr. Carlos Campos and Mr.
Michael Ong.
1August2023
RECEIVED -
DILG - PASAY CITY.I
MR. MARCO A.G. CABI.JENOS IR.
City Director
Departrnent of Interior and Local Govemment
Pasay Field Office
AU6 0 3 2023
BY: DA]E
Dear Director Cabuenos:
In fact, after series of scheduled hearings before the Office of the Lupong TagaPamayaPa
and after mediation failed, a Ccrtificate to File Action was issued in favor of them. Said
certificate is a condition precedcnt before filing any complaint before the court and/or
government offices and is hereto attached as " Annex A".
Thirdly, the undersigned stresses that her office's action on the complaint is to mediate
the parties' conflicting interests pursuant to the Katarungang Pambarangay Law, as
amended by Republic Act No. 7160 otherwise known as the Local Govemment Code of
1991,.
Fourthly, the allegations in the letter of Mr. Garbo and Ms. Facundo dated fuly 3, 2023
addressed to Hon. Benjamin C. Abalos, Jr. is a mere rehash of their allegations contained
in their letter to the Presidential Complaint Center dated Feb'ruary 1,6, 2021,, which the
undersigned already responded on March L8,2022- A copy of the said response is hereto
attached as "Arnex 8".
Fifthly, it is the opinion of the undersigned that her office no longer has jurisdiction over
the complaint as Mr. Garbo and Ms. Facundo already filed a complaint before the Office
of the City Prosecutor of Pasay City where the same was already resolved by the said
office on December 27, 2021,. A copy of the resolution of the Office of the City Prosecutor
of Pasay City is hereto attached as "Annex C".
Finally, the case between Markeman Game Ventures, Inc. represented by its Attorney-in-
Fact, Carlos R. Campos versus Sps. Florian Facundo and Rex Garbo and all persons

claiming rights and interest under them has become final and executory. A copy of the
Notice to Vacate and Pay Money |udgment dated July 1,4,2023, Writ of Execution dated
]une 14, 2023 and Order dated June L4, 2023 was furnished to this office by the
Metropolitan Trial Court Branch 1.67,Pasay City and are hereto attached as "Annex D, D-
1 and D-2", respectively.
On a final note, the letter dated Jrrly 3,20?3 of Mr. Garbo and Ms. Facundo is their last
minute
to it by
to divert this office's attention from the legal correspondence furnished
the Metropolitan Trial Court Branch 167, Pasay City.
For your
Punong
B.
E:r
#:
g
HB,
I
tr

kry"r - A
Ofrlt, ot tDc 5lrtggsiltuilg latargcr
B@qBqr4E, Z@P@6
Oi.tti"itt, pasav Clty, Metro Manila
OFFIGE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA
fR.NEX GANEO
ta. rloRIAx rAcrrmx)
ComPlainant/s
-Agaitut'
fR- cARIos cAuProS
UR. TICEAET, OITG
ResPondent/s
1)
2
Attcsted bY:
Rrx
Beranmv Case No. PAY'BRGY-21O117
F"i'oiitn cflor or suswEss
Cag-PADLOCK ng NegosYo)
CERNtrIC,ATB T'O trII,E AC$OII
There has been a personal confrontation betwecn the parties before the
P";;;;B*.tg.y but on the 3d hearing mediation failed;
Tlnerefore, the corresponding complaint for the disputc ray now be liled in
court/ government office.
Ttris z$ day of AorlL 2![tl.
t Secretar5r
B
f) 6 *(bo
-'LOzl
t*-70

,ATE:
i ll{E:
RECEIVEDA J
Ann ox- B
Republic of the PhiliPPines
@ffirt of tbe Dunong BErangag
Disrrict II, Pasay Ciq', Metro N{:urila
werJl. {tWlL
TO: ENRIQEEPASCUALIII
CommunitY Affalrs OFFICER IY
Pasay CitY
FROM:
RE
Hon. Grace Luclla B. Coryus
PunongBarangaY
Brg.47 Tane'O6
Pasay CitY
LC-,42-2021-ol-14
, District 2
PASAY CITY
BARAIJGAY BUREAU
(ADMIN SECTION )
+$$2alZ-
Dear Sir ENRIQEE PASCUAL tll ,
Mywarnestgreetings,Sir,Enriqee,ThisregardsontheletterofDirectorMARLoS.GUAzoN'
ph.D. of PUBLIC Affairs and Communication Sewice , about the complaint of Mr. Rex H' Garbo
"rJuo.
Florian Facundo ; ;; iegarding sa oBSTRUCTION of Business I Pag PADLOCK ng
Negosyo J bago po ang lahat marami pong salamat
'
Sir, ang nasabing reklamo ay agad po naming tinugunan , Nagpatawag kami ng pag-uusap sa
dalawang panig, o un"ng p"L*1g ay hindi po dumiting ang Respondent '.
muli po naming silang
pi*rt t
"ri
, hindi na naman po d"umating 1ry T:P9-n9*t
na sina Mr' CARLOS CAMPOS at Mr'
ilfiUAfr,-ONC , nag -disisyon po ang Unl-SUIttBONG ( CompUrnant ) na humingi na lang sila ng
certificate to File Action tc.FA ) Aft". po ng sampung araw nila natanggap- ang nasabing
iertificate to File Action ( kalakip po ng aming sagot ang kopiya ng kanilang C'F A)
Punong
Barangay 47,Zone
Pasay City
0*'/ '
'f0n1151'ii

",*rjif#j:nii-i$J*".
REX GARBO ANd FLORIAN R.
FACUNDO, ComPlainants
LS. No. XV-l3-tNV'2'l'F'00598
For: GRAVE COERCION
ihot his nrme i! aduaity spElldd as w?lJohh
gncher
- vefsus -
ieiiH*
[f,11;}ii - x
RESOLUTION
rhisresorves,,lli"tT#::i"ff :"".?lB."llrtJ"',[%'t3f
lndotornrave
l-m'tl*,;u**g **uuffi
The facts appear as follows:
they were suiPrised tc
Complainants then went immediately to respondent Wel John Sanchez' the
I Relpondent avEfied ln tlietr .,oim Counter-Afftdavlt
r s€€ itolrl oo. 5 o{lhe
[nne5- C-

2
guard on duty, and asked who caused the Padlocking of their shop to which the latter
answered that he merely ;;i;;;fuil bt tne t""1" manager'-respondent carlos
Campos. The following o"vlil",."iizo, 2oZ j' conrptainants called Carlos Campos who
told them that he iust t
"eo"i
tf'e oiOers of ine President of One Buen4ia Food Plaza,
Hd;;t' Mi"ni"r ong.;s;;";;J'li;y immediatery had the incident brottered
before the Barangay uut no siittement wai agreeo upon' hence' this complaint
For their part, respondents maintained thet the instant complaint is nothing but
"n "tt
rn'pt'ili tfre compiain"nis to piorong their stay at the subject units despite their
ilirJi" i"irv *," n..ontntv i""i"ri, !s in tict' a casl.fot eiectment has alreadv been
filed before the court. Lixe*isi tite rispondents'.who not only strongly denied' but
arso described as raorrcateJ,
-h-darsiy
ano sert-serting the complainants' aflegation in
their P,nag/sam ang sirumiiiii iii'ii"v 'g
Pagreiaktamo that wel John Sanchez
allegedly told them tnar ne onfi Jei on tn6.orOers of Carlbd Campos' who in turn'
*"ri,-rv rtri"*"0 Michaet ong,s'inrtiuct,ong lne.v
atso asserted that the photographs
;ith" p;J@iea units oo n6t cre"iri depict thai what has been padlocked were the
,irit. fJ"*O Oyine comptainants a;d that it cannot prove that those padlocks were
il;a;|aced'at the time wnenln"y *ur" not altegedty in the premises.Thev also
cannot be said to have O".n pr"r"rit"d from doinisomething not prohibited by the
law or has allegeoty competteo'them to do something against their will considenng that
in"V
"i"
-rtifi
*.ui,ing ine teased premtses and opeiating their^business up to the
nraqanr Finallv. thev cfaim tnat the case againsi Wel John SanChez should be
[;;"U'i.
'riini
i in" t""t that he was hot even included in the impleaded
respondents in the Certmcate to FileAction'
,o. XV'13'lNV-21 -l'-00598
iSOLUTION
We now rcsolve
r fenequito il. rlvs. veBara G.R No 172829,uly 18,2012
Probablecause,forthepurposeoflilingacrirninalinformation,hasbeen
defined as such facts as are suffrcient to engender a well-founded belief that a crime
;;; bd-fimitteO and ttrai respondent ii probably guilty thereoJ'.The-term does
;;t;il'bctual and positive cause" nor does it import absolute certainty' It is merely
;il; opinion unO re"*nabte bellef. Probable cause does not requlre an inquiry
irt" *r*tm tnere is sufficient evidence to procure a conviction' It is enough that it is
believed that the aA or omission complained of constitutes the ofEnse charged'3
Parenthetically,partofthepublicprosecutorSdutytodetermine.ifthereexists
a well-tuunded belief ttlat a crime hai Ueen committed, and that the
-suspect
is
p.oGury guilty of the same, is the corollary findings that the elements of the crime
liriigti.6*fb, in,att.reasonable litelihood, be present. This is based on the principle
itiilr".V crime is defined by its elements, withour whlch there should be, at most,
no.ririn'uf ofanse.aThus, for grave coerf,ion to lie, the fullowlnq elements must be
present: .
1. That a person is prevented by another from doing something
not prohibited by law, or tompelled to do something against his will'
' lbul

llu /
3
r{o. XV-t 3'lNV'2{'}O0598
.ESOLUTION
-----------.----x
Perusal of the Pinagsa mdQg ginumpe-ang sa'avsay ry Pasrcrl<1a!-3.*"^y"d
that the complainants rir"o ine lnilattt casL lor grave coercidn upon tne existence of
tle follqwing elements
"
a'ot"O in the vernaolrlar' viz;
a. " Kami ay pinigilan ng mga 1faling
tao hd ptmasoft sa aming
inuupahaig P7in"'''o' doh't d'tu ay hindi kami maayos na
*t'p's'''lii'-i'"Joroioii'nop butwv ot dahit dittt av u'ata
kaming kinita;
Ang pagtigil sa amin na pumasok sa aming puwesto al magl indu
';',i;rgT-;rp
buhay ng maayos ay Binawa sa pamamagitan ng
pagtadlock sa aming Puwesto::;a
wrl JIHN ilANCHEZ (src),
Malinaw na walang karaPalat
'iliiIiiiZeruios at i'tIcHAELoNG na sai')in ito sapagkar
ifi;;;;;"k7i r"i*on ng xo e na pinalavasan sitang
gawin ito.'6
A simple reading of the same showsthat the comolainants merely alleged (1)
padlocking the complainan;;t;;i; unit which-prevented them from selling clothes
and (2) that the persons
''["'J'fiiilOrv
iaused the.padlockins has no authoritv from
the court to do so. con,p'i'"o'irliitit"- *t no arlggation *'taining to the second
element or how the pr"r"ni.ion or'l*pursion was effected (r'ie., with violence, threats
b
c
In the case of Ioseph Anthony Aleiandro' et' al vs' AW' lose Bernas' et
ar.6, the compraint ro, gr.;#r.';;ffidlr*d for simirarrv fairins to attege that
the fact of padlocKng
"J
ftiil ;tr of Facilities to Drevent the petitloners from
entering the subject
'nit
*"'" e*LLJ by violence' threat or intimidation' While the
intimidation due to the pr;;;';;;sril;;r; oebtedly alleged bvthe petitioner
rhe supreme corrt neue'til"r& nrfi in'i
'nott
the obtaining circumstances there
was stilt no intimidation *:ffi;i";,il'*ii"t *"rra warrant the indictrnent of the
respondents for grave coercion' --
The case went flrrther and exprained that -ffihere is intimidation when one of
the pafties is compelled by ;;;;til;"inJ "urrgioJnded
fear of an imminent and
orave evil upon his person o; ffitt'; ;;;'"1 l1e.?:*t
or propertv of his spouse'
iescendants or asc€ndants, to give his consdnt. Materlal violence ls not indispensable
or intimidation)'
l Pleaia re€ io ll olthe PlnditamanS slnumpaant
6G R No- L79243 scptcmbor7,2o11
Salaytsy rl9 hEtergllmio
',
be it risht or wrone; i i-
i
1 .
"" " "il liiut thetreventio{ or corpulsion is
fcted
bv
liolence'
threaB or intimidation; and I
3. That the person wnl restrains the will afd liberty of another
has no right to do so, or It ffi;;*dt that the &srtraint.iS'rl9t made
ffi;;ffi;iv ot t.* ot in ine exerctse of anv lawfr'rl right'
(-.t)

rrina th
.r(o, )ot't 3'lNV'21 +{}059t
'Ibid .. . ofthe ptnagramarB $nurnddn8 salayrty n8 Prgrerelldso
s
See. prefsldy srEtcmenl aTd llo J - '
I 4
li'
,i

l
, dd. xv-t s-lxv-21'l-'oos98
.tESOLUTION
ll,
THE {
F.ol
F:l
['':
I
------x
I..d<-*.-.----r--
as one of the resPondents during th bdrangay conciliation
ri
woutO
]4V
be an exercise
n against WEL
recommended
dred
and
th€ cas6 fo
fUICHAEL
f rave
MELVIN N A, UMALI
Atsistant City Prosecutor
Roll of AttorneYs No. 60692
IBP PPLM Liletime No. 074959/02-26-1 9
IMCLE Exemption No. V-00'1503104-14-22
RECOMMENDING APFROVAL:
(Per No.,& S. of 2021)
SERAFIN,S.
SeniqrAs$ist
Chief , Divisio
City Prosecutor
B
APPROVED BY AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY PROSECUTOR:
(Per Office Order No. 6-A, S. of 2021)
vlu
JOSE DE ASAS
Deputy Prosecutor
No. VI-0015243 -
MCLE Complia
Valid Until Altll 14,2022
Copy Fumished:
- -i
i", Gatbo and Florlan Facundo - 301 Buendia St, cor LRT Statioo Pasay City
i. ii;iJ.fia"ninr., cadosGampos and Michael ong -ail c/o one Buendia Food
- pliza.sen, Clt Puyat Ave. comer Tat Avenu6, Pasay Clty
1
5
WHEREFORE, Premises
SANCHEZ, CARLOS
for lack of probable
21 December2O2l ,Pasay
:FCri'i oR
t , ,.-'
I

b [n.'rr-D D,'9*
Branch 167, Pasay City
Email: metc1osvl67 iudiciarv.oov.oh
Contact number, (8) 831-11-09 / (+63) 9692616167
MARKEMAN GAME VENTURES,
lNC. Rep. by its Attorney-in-Fact,
Carlos R. Campos
Plaintiff/s,
-versus-
SPS. FLORIAN FACUNDO and REX
CLAIMING RIGHTS AND INTEREST
UNDER THEM,
DefendanUs.
X----- ---------X
Civil Case No: M-PSY-21 -01 1 0,t -CV
FoT: UNLAWFUL DETAINER
NOTICE TO VAC EA DTO MONEY JUDGM NT
SPS. FLORTAN FACUNDO and REX GARBO and ALL
CLAIMING RIGHTS AND INTEREST UNDER THEM
- Buendia 1, pasay CityCode g and Buendia 1 Cod
Buendia Food place located at No. 301 Sen.
(Buendia) corner Taft Avenue, pasay City
PERSONS
e9ofOne
Gil Puyat
GREETINGS:
By virtue of the Order dated 14 June 2023 issued by HON. SHEILA
MARIE v. slsoN-JAVTER, presiding Juage, ana ihe writ of Erecrtion is.uEo
thereafter, copies of which are attached he6to and served upon Vou,
"nJ
Vo,
"i"
hereby DIR-ECTED to peaceably vAcATE the leased premises ioentiiieo as
Buendia 1, code 8 and Buendia i cooe 9 ot one Buendia Food prace rol"i"o .i
No, 30.1 Sen. Git puyat (Bu.endia) comer Taft Averue, easayCity *iif.,i, tiri?6j
calendar days and to pAy the foilowing money judgment to plaintiff, to wit:
1. the amounts of:-(a) Four Hundred._Eight Thousand Twenty
Pesos and twenty{ne centavos (?401, O2O.Z1,1 r"pr"r;;ti;;
the unpaid rentals as of 20 April 202i: and'(b) ffrfty ifrousani
P_esos (?30,000.00) and One Hundred itrousina pesos
(fi00,000.00) per month as rentals for Buendia 1, Code eanA
Buendia 1 Code.g,.respectively,
"orr"n"ing
on ZO Uay ZOil
up to the time that defendanti finally vaca{e and deliver the
reased premises to plaintiff, prus interest onthe said
"rornta
,i
the rate of six percent (67o-) per annur, to be computed from 15
February 2021 , the date of'judicial OemanO, untif full payment;
2. the legal interest. on. the interest due on the unpaid rentals,
accruing as of judicial demand wtrictr snatt Oe (6%j per
";;;;
from the time of judicial demand untit tuffy pjO; anO
TO:

NolilE lo V*.ate and lo pfilorcy juqnent -/
MARKEMAN GAME VENruRES, tNC. Rsp. by its AttoflBynn+ad, Cados R. campos VS.
sPs. FLoRIAN FAcuNDo snd REx cAFtso s,nd ALL pERsoNs culMtNc R GHTS A/vD ,/vrER€s r ,NDER THEM
Civr? Case trro.lr-Psy-21 -01 1 01 -CV
3. the amount of Twenty Thousand pesos (P20,OOO.OO)
attorney's feed, plus legal interest thereon at the rate of 67o
per annum to be computed from the finality of this Decision
until full payment; and
4. the cost of suit.
Failure to do so, the undersigned has no altemative but to resort to
forcible aclions under the law to implement the said Writ of Execution.
14 July 2023
PRINCE DICT M, PAREDES
Sheriff lll
Received copy:
. ru,f.
)3
ATTY ANGEL P VERMAS /ATTY. JULIE IqREN U. PAGANAJE
Defendant's Counsel
Public Attomey's Office, 4u Ftoor, Hall of Justice Bldg., pasay City
ATTY SANCHO M. FERANCULLO
Plaintiffs Counsel
Room 206, C. K. Sy Diamond Btdg., No. 156 Libertad St., pasay City
PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION FOR THE URBAN POOR (PCUP)
1614 Quezon Ave., Oiliman, Quezon City, Metro Manila
PASAY CIry'S URBAN DEVELOPMENTAND HOUSING OFFICE
Pasay City Hall, Pasay City
CHIEF OF POLICE
NCRPO
RHQ Bldg., Camp Bagong Diwa, Lower Bicutan, Taguig City
THRU the Office of Chief of Potice Operations
F. B. Hanison St., Brrgy. 70, Pasay City
BARANGAY CHAIRPERSON
Brgy. 4* Pasay City
Copy Fumished:
+sl^

v
WRIT OF EXECUTION
Ma*eman Game Ventures, lnc- vs.
Floian Facundo, et al.
Civil Case No. M-PSY-21-01101-CV
z
WHEREAS, on 2'l December 2021, the Court granted the plaintiffs Motion
for Execution.
NOWTHEREFORE, you are hereby commanded to cause the execution of
the aforesaid Decision; to levy the goods and chattels of the defendants sps.
FLORIAN FACUNDO and REX GARBO and ALL PERSONS CLA|M|NG
RIGHTS AND lNrEREsr UNDER THEM of one Buendia Food place located
at No. 301 Sen, Gil Puyat{Buendia} comer TaftAvenues, pasay City except
those which are exempt from execution; and to make the same thireof in
accordance with the procedure laid down in Rule 39 of the Revised Rules of court,
and in such cases made and provided, together with all your lawful fees for the
ln case sufiicient personal property of the defendant cannot be found to
satisfo the amount of said Decision, you are hereby direcled to levy the real
You are directed to make a retum of your proceedings pursuant to Seclion
14, Rule 39 of the 2019 Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.
WITNESS, the HON. SHEILA MARIE V. SISONJAVIER, Presiding Judge
of this Court, this 14s day of June 2023, al Pasay City, Metro Manila.
7,
DYAN R. LLAIUAS.PASGUAL
Cletu d,Court lll
CER,T[FIE
DYAN R. LtA
Clerk cf Ccurt
RUb, CUi- I
PASCUAL
MeTC, Branch
167, Pasay Ci
of 6yo per annum to be computecl from the finalv of this Decision
until full paytBnt and
5. fo PAyt e cosis of surif.
sooRoEREO."

v
WRIT OF EXECUTION
Ma*eman Game Ventures, lnc. vs.
Floian Facundo, et al.
Civil Case No. M-PSY-21-01101-CV
2
of 694 per annum to be computed frcm the ftnality of this Decision
until full payment and
5. To PAY the cosfs ofsult
SO ORDERED."
WHEREAS, on 21 December2021, the Court granted the plaintifrs Motion
for Execution.
NOWTHEREFORE, you are hereby commanded to cause the execution of
the aforesaid Decision; to levy the goods and chattels of the defendants SpS,
FLORIAN FACUNDO and REX GARBO and ALL PERSONS CLAIM|NG
RIGHTS AND INTEREST UNDER THEM of one Buendia Food place tocated
at No. 301 Sen, Gil Puyat (Buendia) corner Taft Avenuee, pasay City except
those which are exempt from execution; and to make the same thereof in
accordance with the procedure laid down in Rule 39 of the Revised Rules of court,
and in such cases made and provided, together with all your lawful fees for the
In case sufiicient personal property of the defendant cannot be found to
satisfy the amount of said Decision, you are hereby directed to levy the real
You are directed to make a retum of your proceedings pursuant to Section
14, Rule 39 of the 201 9 Amendments to the 1 997 Rules of Civil procedure.
WITNESS, the HON. SHEILA tlARlE V. SISONJAVIER, Presiding Judge
of this Court, this 14th day of June 2023, al Pasay City, Metro Manila.
DYAN R. LLAMAS.PASCUAL
Clerk dCourt lll
CER,TEFTE
n
DYAN R.
Clerk cf Ccurt
RUt CUr- r,
PASCUAL
MeTC, Branch
162 Pasay

Alt . S.ncho X. F...ncullo
Ptalnttlg Counlel
Roorri 203, C-K S-y Oiriond BldC., No. 156 Ub.rbd St, Psry Clty
En il: &l9oeLag&$gs@
Floah Facu.rdo
D6ndant
Onr Buqidir Food Phc.. No. 301. Sen. Gil Puyrt (Elrcrdl!) co.. TanAvc., P!!8y City
ia, Garto
t atbndlnt
Onc &rndir Food Plac!. No. 301, S6n. Gil Puy.t (Bu€ndia) cq. TaftAve., PLy Cify
2
Foftunato cajucom,l the supreme court held that once the judgment becomes
final, the prevailing party is entifled as a matter of right to a writ 6t execution. lts
issuance is, in fact, the trial. court's ministerial duty, ihe only rimitation being that
the writ must conform substantially to every essential particular of the judf,meni
promulgated, more particularly, the orders or decrees in the dispositive portlon ot
the decision. Furthermore, the court held that even the holding in abeyance of the
issuance of a writ of execution of a final and executoryiudgmeit can be considered
abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court.
Taking into account that the appealed Decision has become final and
executory the issuance of a Writ of Execution is proper.
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs Motion for Execution is hereby GRANTED. Let a
writ of Execution be issued based on the appealed Decision dated 29 November
2021 . The Sheriff of this court is DIRECTED to implement this Order.
The Philippine National Police and/or the concerned law enforcers are
requested and directed to extend and provide the necessary assistance in the
implementation of the Writ in accordance with law.
SO ORDERED.
14 June2023
Pasay City
SHE!LA M E SISONJAV!ER
Judge
Copy fumishedi
For paBonal ttrvice:
Atlr. Angel P. Vefin! / Atty. Julie l(.r.n U. P.g.n.ie
ftiblic Attomeyl Ofice, Hall of Jugttce, Pasay City
ErEil !€o aovemasroomail com I ikoaoanaie(lortatl com
Fo. regist r€d nail
Lrrtcrn n Glmo V3ntur!., lnc. (Rap. by: C..loa R Crnpoq)
Pbimifi
No. 301 . S€fl. Gil Puyat (Buendis) cor TJt Avo., PEr.y Cig
Enrail:
SMVSJ/OLP
I G.R. No. 171095, 22 Junc 20'15
sfffiffi;
w
Order v
Ma*eman Game Venturcs, lnc. v.
Florian Facundo, et al.
C,vil Casa No. M-PSY-21-0110|-CV

Branch 167, PasayCity
Email: metcl Dsv167@iudicia oov.oh
contact number: (+63)9565070962(8)831 1 109
MARKEMAN GAME VENTURES,
lNC. Rep. by its Attorney-in-Fact
Carlos R. Campos
Plaintiffs,
-versus-
SPS. FLORIAN FACUNDO and REX
CLAIMING R]GHTS AND INTEREST
UNDER THEM,
Defendants.
x----- -----x
WRIT OF EXECUTION
TO PRINCE BENIDICT M. PAREDES
MeTC, Branch 167,
WHEREAS, a Decision dated 29 November 2021 was rendered in this case,
the dispositive portion of which reads as follows:
"WHEREFORE, p/emr.ses considered, this coutt renders judgment in favor of
plaintiff MARKENEN CAME VENTURES, lNC., twresentod by iE Attomey-
ia-Fact Caios R. Campos, against defendants SPS. FLOR AIV FACUNDO and
REX GARBO, end all peBons clalming righ,s und.r them, ordering the lafter:
1. to VACATE the /easad premises identifted as Buendia 1 Code I and
Buendia l Coda I of One Buendia F@d Place locatad at No.301
Sen. Gil Puyat (Buendia) comer Tafr Avenues, Pasay City, and to
DELIVER its pdacaful possassrbn to plaintift,
2. to PAY plain ff the amounts ot (a) Four Hundred Etght Thousand
lwenty P.sos end twenty-one ceaayos (Vn8,020.21)
rapresenting the unpaid rentals as of 20 April 2021; and (b) Thi/.ly
fhousand Pgitos (?110,0N.(N) and One Hundred Thousand
P$8 (?loo,Un.N) par month as /Bnfars for Buendia 1 Code I
and Buendia lCde 9, rcspectively, comnencing on 20 May 2021 up
to the time that defendants finally vacaE and deliver the leased
premises to plaintiff, plus interestq on the said amounts at the rate of
six percent (60/") per annum. to be computed from 15 June 2021 . the
date of judicial demand, until full paymant:
3. to Pay plaintitr legal interest on the interest due on the unpaid rentals
accruing as of judicial demand which sha be six perccnt (6%) per
annum ftom the time ot judicial demand until tully pakl:
4. to PAY plaintiff the amount of TWENW IHOUS ND PESOS
(n0,000.00) as attomeys fees, plus legal interest thereon at the rate
Cai<.Tll[3IE TR,UE COPY
OYAN R. .PASCUAL
, MeTC, Branch
Clerk cf Ccurt
1
137, PEy c
Civil Case No: M-PSY-21-01101-CV
For: UNLA /FUL DETAINER
GREETINGS:

DILG MC 2002-150

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

DILG MC 2002-150