SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
SYLLOGISM
(By Venn Diagrams)
By Immediate and Mediate
Inferences
Meaning of Syllogism
• A word given by the Greeks which means 'Inference' or
'Deduction'. We get to deduce logically from the given
propositions. Each proposition has a subject and a
predicate and we get to establish the relationship
between them.
• Propositions : Sentence that makes a relation between
subject and predicate.
Solving Syllogism by Venn Diagram
• Diagrams are pictorial ways of representing interactions
among sets to display information that can be read
easily.
• Syllogisms can be solved in many ways, however the
most frequently used method is by using the so called
“Venn diagrams”.
• Venn diagram show all possible and hypothetically
logical relations between a collection of finite and infinite
statements.
Type of propositions
Type of propositions Universal Particular
Positive A Format
All S are P
I Format
Some S are P
Negative E Format
No S are P
O Format
Some S are not P
Mediate and Immediate Inferences
Syllogism is actually a problem of mediate inferences.
For Example:
Statement: All S are P
All P are Q.
Inference: All S are Q.
While in Immediate Inference conclusion are drawn from only one
given proposition.
Statement: All Coasts are Beaches.
Immediate Inference: Some Beaches are Coasts.
Immediate Inference
Statement : All S are P.
P
S
Sl.No Conclusions
I No S are P
II Some S are P
III Some S are not
P
IV All P are S
V No P are S
VI Some P are S
VII Some P are not
S
Venn-Diagram
method is based on
Minimum
Overlapping
Concept.
Remarks
X
√
X
---
X
√
---
Immedite Inference• Statement : NO S are P.
Sl.No Conclusions
I All S are P
II Some S are P
III Some S are not
P
IV All P are S
V No P are S
VI Some P are S
VII Some P are not
S
Venn-Diagram
method is based on
Minimum
Overlapping
Concept.
Remarks
X
X
√
X
√
X
√
PS
VIII Only Some S are not P :
Not follows
PS
Immediate Inference
Statement: Some S are P.
Sl.No Conclusions
I All S are P
II No S are P
III Some S are not
P
IV All P are S
V No P are S
VI Some P are S
VII Some P are not
S
Venn-Diagram
method is based on
Minimum
Overlapping
Concept.
Remarks
---
X
---
---
X
√
---
Statement : Some S are not P.
Sl.No Conclusions
I All S are P
II No S are P
III Some S are P
IV All P are S
V No P are S
VI Some P are S
VII Some P are not
S
Venn-Diagram
method is based on
Minimum
Overlapping
Concept.
Remarks
X
---
---
---
---
---
---
S P
Immediate Inference
• Illustration:
• Statement: Some B are C.
• 1. Conclusions: I. All B are C.
• II. Some B are not C.
• 2. Conclusions: I. All B are C.
• II. Some C are not B.
Thumb Rule for Either or Conclusions:
Rule-1. I. ----- II. -----
Rule-2. I. +ive II. –ive
Rule-3. I. S P
II. S P
Rule-4. All, No can’t be either or.
Mediate Inferences
"All" Type Propositions
Statement:
• All students in my batch are Intellegent
• Ram belongs to my batch
Conclusion:
• Ram is Intellegent
Mediate Inferences
"All & No" Type Propositions
Statement:
• All students in my batch are Intellegent
• Sham does not belong to my batch
Conclusion:
• Sham is not Intellegent
• Sham is Intellegent
Mediate Inferences
"All & Some Not" Type Propositions
Statement:
• All students in my batch are Intellegent
• Some students in this batch are topper
Conclusion:
• Some toppers in this bach are Intellegent
• Some toppers are not Intellegent
• All toppers are Intellegent
Mediate Inferences
"All & Some Not" Type Propositions
Statement:
• All students in my batch are Intellegent
• Some students are not toppers
Conclusion:
• Some Intellegent are topper
• Some Intellegent are not topper
• Some students are topper
• Some students are not topper
Tips to confirm Conclusions
1.Draw a BD and confirm the given conclusions by visualizing the ADs.
2. If any conclusion being a possibility case, its not a necessary
condition, as atleast one possibility can confirm the conclusion.
Other than this, any conclusion (either in +ve or -ve tone, should be
treated as necessary condition.
3. If the middle term is missing in the two cosequetive statements, one
statement should be skipped to find the link in the other statement.
The skipped statement can be caught up later to complete the basic
minimum diagram.
4. If the Subjects and Predicates of the two given conclusions are same
and they are contradictory in nature i.e. one in +ve and other in -ve
in nature, it's the case of either/or. Apply the thumb rule.

More Related Content

Similar to Clear concepts of syllogism & key rules

Eng 1060 week 1
Eng 1060 week 1Eng 1060 week 1
Eng 1060 week 1stanbridge
 
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptx
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptxChapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptx
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptxnguyengiahuy02012004
 
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argumentjipexe1248
 
The pyramid principle
The pyramid principleThe pyramid principle
The pyramid principletimurnarbaev
 
Categorical made by Fatima
Categorical made by FatimaCategorical made by Fatima
Categorical made by FatimaLeena Khan
 
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docxrhetttrevannion
 
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptx
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptxinductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptx
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptxDystopianSh
 
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallaciesJustin Morris
 
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptUnit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptkeshavpahwa3
 
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10GE372: Weeks Nine and 10
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10Comp Class
 
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013Dario Morandotti
 
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docxalisondakintxt
 
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptxLecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptxsharmi28it
 
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3Victoria Clarke
 
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2Afianmustam1
 

Similar to Clear concepts of syllogism & key rules (20)

Logic (1)
Logic (1)Logic (1)
Logic (1)
 
ตัวจริง
ตัวจริงตัวจริง
ตัวจริง
 
Eng 1060 week 1
Eng 1060 week 1Eng 1060 week 1
Eng 1060 week 1
 
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptx
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptxChapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptx
Chapter 9 - Categosdsdsdrical Logic.pptx
 
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
5_6192566572737889031 structure of argument
 
The pyramid principle
The pyramid principleThe pyramid principle
The pyramid principle
 
The pyramid principle by barbara minto
The pyramid principle by barbara mintoThe pyramid principle by barbara minto
The pyramid principle by barbara minto
 
Categorical made by Fatima
Categorical made by FatimaCategorical made by Fatima
Categorical made by Fatima
 
Module_4_2.pptx
Module_4_2.pptxModule_4_2.pptx
Module_4_2.pptx
 
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
35878 Topic Discussion5Number of Pages 1 (Double Spaced).docx
 
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptx
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptxinductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptx
inductive-and-deductive-reasoning-ppt.pptx
 
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
03. intro to argument, informal fallacies
 
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.pptUnit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
Unit 1 topic 2 deductive_vs_induction.ppt
 
Critical thinking
Critical thinkingCritical thinking
Critical thinking
 
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10GE372: Weeks Nine and 10
GE372: Weeks Nine and 10
 
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013
English Public Speaking Checklist & Map 20-Jun-2013
 
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
1000 - 1500 word argumentative essay PROMPT Is putting yourse.docx
 
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptxLecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
Lecture 2 - Nature and use of argument.pptx
 
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3
Braun, Clarke & Hayfield Thematic Analysis Part 3
 
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2
Mte3023 mathematical reasoning 2021 week 2
 

Clear concepts of syllogism & key rules

  • 1. SYLLOGISM (By Venn Diagrams) By Immediate and Mediate Inferences
  • 2. Meaning of Syllogism • A word given by the Greeks which means 'Inference' or 'Deduction'. We get to deduce logically from the given propositions. Each proposition has a subject and a predicate and we get to establish the relationship between them. • Propositions : Sentence that makes a relation between subject and predicate.
  • 3. Solving Syllogism by Venn Diagram • Diagrams are pictorial ways of representing interactions among sets to display information that can be read easily. • Syllogisms can be solved in many ways, however the most frequently used method is by using the so called “Venn diagrams”. • Venn diagram show all possible and hypothetically logical relations between a collection of finite and infinite statements.
  • 4. Type of propositions Type of propositions Universal Particular Positive A Format All S are P I Format Some S are P Negative E Format No S are P O Format Some S are not P
  • 5. Mediate and Immediate Inferences Syllogism is actually a problem of mediate inferences. For Example: Statement: All S are P All P are Q. Inference: All S are Q. While in Immediate Inference conclusion are drawn from only one given proposition. Statement: All Coasts are Beaches. Immediate Inference: Some Beaches are Coasts.
  • 6. Immediate Inference Statement : All S are P. P S Sl.No Conclusions I No S are P II Some S are P III Some S are not P IV All P are S V No P are S VI Some P are S VII Some P are not S Venn-Diagram method is based on Minimum Overlapping Concept. Remarks X √ X --- X √ ---
  • 7. Immedite Inference• Statement : NO S are P. Sl.No Conclusions I All S are P II Some S are P III Some S are not P IV All P are S V No P are S VI Some P are S VII Some P are not S Venn-Diagram method is based on Minimum Overlapping Concept. Remarks X X √ X √ X √ PS VIII Only Some S are not P : Not follows
  • 8. PS Immediate Inference Statement: Some S are P. Sl.No Conclusions I All S are P II No S are P III Some S are not P IV All P are S V No P are S VI Some P are S VII Some P are not S Venn-Diagram method is based on Minimum Overlapping Concept. Remarks --- X --- --- X √ ---
  • 9. Statement : Some S are not P. Sl.No Conclusions I All S are P II No S are P III Some S are P IV All P are S V No P are S VI Some P are S VII Some P are not S Venn-Diagram method is based on Minimum Overlapping Concept. Remarks X --- --- --- --- --- --- S P
  • 10. Immediate Inference • Illustration: • Statement: Some B are C. • 1. Conclusions: I. All B are C. • II. Some B are not C. • 2. Conclusions: I. All B are C. • II. Some C are not B. Thumb Rule for Either or Conclusions: Rule-1. I. ----- II. ----- Rule-2. I. +ive II. –ive Rule-3. I. S P II. S P Rule-4. All, No can’t be either or.
  • 11. Mediate Inferences "All" Type Propositions Statement: • All students in my batch are Intellegent • Ram belongs to my batch Conclusion: • Ram is Intellegent
  • 12. Mediate Inferences "All & No" Type Propositions Statement: • All students in my batch are Intellegent • Sham does not belong to my batch Conclusion: • Sham is not Intellegent • Sham is Intellegent
  • 13. Mediate Inferences "All & Some Not" Type Propositions Statement: • All students in my batch are Intellegent • Some students in this batch are topper Conclusion: • Some toppers in this bach are Intellegent • Some toppers are not Intellegent • All toppers are Intellegent
  • 14. Mediate Inferences "All & Some Not" Type Propositions Statement: • All students in my batch are Intellegent • Some students are not toppers Conclusion: • Some Intellegent are topper • Some Intellegent are not topper • Some students are topper • Some students are not topper
  • 15. Tips to confirm Conclusions 1.Draw a BD and confirm the given conclusions by visualizing the ADs. 2. If any conclusion being a possibility case, its not a necessary condition, as atleast one possibility can confirm the conclusion. Other than this, any conclusion (either in +ve or -ve tone, should be treated as necessary condition. 3. If the middle term is missing in the two cosequetive statements, one statement should be skipped to find the link in the other statement. The skipped statement can be caught up later to complete the basic minimum diagram. 4. If the Subjects and Predicates of the two given conclusions are same and they are contradictory in nature i.e. one in +ve and other in -ve in nature, it's the case of either/or. Apply the thumb rule.