SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Results DiscussionIntroduction
Methods & Procedure
Implication
Student Ideas About Seasons
Preeti Sahu
Syracuse University
Dept. of Physics, PHY 600
29th Nov 2015
My AST TA class, a heterogeneous blend of
students from different non-science majors,
is an ideal place to study students’ perception
of ‘how seasons are caused’.
The innocuous looking tilt in Earth’s
rotational axis has got a profound impact-
change in seasons. But a majority of people
do not understand this completely. A peek
into the process of learning, can help us
teach students more effectively so that they
appreciate the importance of doing science
and feel intellectually armed for such
everyday phenomena.
A literature search can give some vital input
on how to assess students’ understanding of
this topic. Following the directions, I framed a
questionnaire and provided it to 35 of my
students, as soon as they entered into the
class. By this time, they had already learnt
this topic in their theory class.
(Coincidentally, they also had a midterm the
very next day, assessing the same!)
1. What reasoning, did you believe, caused change in
seasons, prior to attending Christian's lecture on it?
2. What reasoning do you believe now?
3. Please draw your hometown by drawing a globe
(make are you label north up). What season do you
think it's having now?
4. What seasons do you think the equatorial regions
experience?
5. Do both hemispheres experience the same season
at a given point of time in a year?
6. Draw diagrams to explain your answer in 5th
question, based on your current belief.
46%
48%
6%
Question-4
Constant warm/ wet-dry Summer/Winter/Fall no response
Question-5 was an unequivocal -“No!”.
Similarly, the diagram made for the last
question was pretty similar to the samples
given below. The explanation given alongside
the diagrams (regarding flux) revealed that
the argument was quite convincing to them
too.
Almost everyone answered that their current
belief (after attending the theory class) is- the
flux change caused by tilt of earth’s rotational
axis.
Sadly, no one was from the Southern
hemisphere. Everyone except two, were from
a place in the Northern Hemisphere and
predicted that it is experiencing fall. The
remaining two were from a place near the
Equator. Their predictions are quite similar-
“No seasons, but getting a little colder”, “I
believe the equatorial regions are also
experiencing a mild fall”.
The first question aims at understanding the
pre-formed mental models and the rest to
assess if they’ve understood it properly in the
lecture.
The response is analyzed by counting the
number of students having similar answers.
1). Instead of hand-holding the students
through– ‘this is how people usually think and
this is the way you should think’, let them
postulate their own hypotheses by playing
around with the physical parameters [in a
simulation perhaps]. This develops their
metacognitive skills and gives better self
satisfaction than a black-box scaffolding.
2). A considerable amount of time should be
spent on negating popular beliefs too. Else
their previous mental model might hover
unresolved forever.
3). A small portion should be incorporated in
the lab work (simulation based ). It could be a
take home assignment to track the weather in
different places on earth all throughout the
semester and then relate it to their
geographical attributes.
4). Catchy one-liners do a good job in
imprinting themselves in students’ minds but
sometimes practicing is the only way to
actually understand the concept.
As far as pre-formed mental models are
concerned, the most prevalent one seems to
be- “the closer to the sun, the warmer.” It
could be biased because the response was
recorded after they learned about most
popular misconceptions in the class.
Regarding conceptual grasp, the class seems
well aware of the key points i.e. the actual
reasoning and the diagrams (invariably
everyone sketched the exact diagram that is
conventionally used for teaching). But, when
it comes to applying the concept, the
degeneracy breaks. To confirm this, one can
elaborate question-4 such that they also
reason out their prediction. One can then
deduce the mental modes that prevents them
to reach to the correct answer.
Please note that the way of putting forth the
questions might have affected the results
(this can be checked by testing the same
content with a differently prepared question
set). Some probably misunderstood question-
4 as- ‘what season is it in the equator now’.
References
• “Seasons reasons” (October 2005) retrieved from
www.scienceu.com
• Jessica Fries-Gaither (August 2011) “Sunrise, Sunset: Learning
About Seasons” retrieved from
http://beyondpenguins.ehe.osu.edu/
• “The Sun and the Earth” retrieved from
http://education.nationalgeographic.org/
• Schoenfeld (1987)- “Metacognition”
• Redish (1994)- “Mental Models”
• Etkina et al (2005)- “Scaffolding”
Template Courtesy- Graphicsland/MakeSigns.com

More Related Content

Similar to Poster1-2

Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel GelmanRelevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
STEM Summit
 
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
ilanasaxe
 
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagementBctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
Jeff Hutton
 
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
ShainaBoling829
 
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
lschmidt1170
 
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
gbushey
 

Similar to Poster1-2 (20)

Critical Thinking...for Life.
Critical Thinking...for Life.Critical Thinking...for Life.
Critical Thinking...for Life.
 
Another Reason That Physics Students Learn By Rote
Another Reason That Physics Students Learn By RoteAnother Reason That Physics Students Learn By Rote
Another Reason That Physics Students Learn By Rote
 
Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel GelmanRelevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
Relevant Science Learning Paths for Preschool - Rochel Gelman
 
4Phases_of_research_process_-_Hanacek.doc
4Phases_of_research_process_-_Hanacek.doc4Phases_of_research_process_-_Hanacek.doc
4Phases_of_research_process_-_Hanacek.doc
 
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
A critical thinking framework for understanding excellence in biological thin...
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 
Final Unit Plan
Final Unit PlanFinal Unit Plan
Final Unit Plan
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 
Teaching physics
Teaching physicsTeaching physics
Teaching physics
 
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagementBctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
Bctela oct 19 Building inquiry and engagement
 
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
Floating and sinking3 4 SCIENCE SCOPEby Yue Yin, Miki
 
TOK_SB_IBDIP_CH4(full permission).pdf
TOK_SB_IBDIP_CH4(full permission).pdfTOK_SB_IBDIP_CH4(full permission).pdf
TOK_SB_IBDIP_CH4(full permission).pdf
 
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
Physical science 101 intro sp 2011
 
Gdp2 2013 14_3
Gdp2 2013 14_3Gdp2 2013 14_3
Gdp2 2013 14_3
 
A Summary Of Research In Science Education 1987. Part 1
A Summary Of Research In Science Education   1987. Part 1A Summary Of Research In Science Education   1987. Part 1
A Summary Of Research In Science Education 1987. Part 1
 
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
Sss Grades 6 8 Unit 2
 
Scientific epistemology (2)
Scientific epistemology (2)Scientific epistemology (2)
Scientific epistemology (2)
 
Online Learning
Online LearningOnline Learning
Online Learning
 
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUSWHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
 
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUSWHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
WHY JUST TEACH ART: THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE HIPPOCAMPUS
 

Poster1-2

  • 1. Results DiscussionIntroduction Methods & Procedure Implication Student Ideas About Seasons Preeti Sahu Syracuse University Dept. of Physics, PHY 600 29th Nov 2015 My AST TA class, a heterogeneous blend of students from different non-science majors, is an ideal place to study students’ perception of ‘how seasons are caused’. The innocuous looking tilt in Earth’s rotational axis has got a profound impact- change in seasons. But a majority of people do not understand this completely. A peek into the process of learning, can help us teach students more effectively so that they appreciate the importance of doing science and feel intellectually armed for such everyday phenomena. A literature search can give some vital input on how to assess students’ understanding of this topic. Following the directions, I framed a questionnaire and provided it to 35 of my students, as soon as they entered into the class. By this time, they had already learnt this topic in their theory class. (Coincidentally, they also had a midterm the very next day, assessing the same!) 1. What reasoning, did you believe, caused change in seasons, prior to attending Christian's lecture on it? 2. What reasoning do you believe now? 3. Please draw your hometown by drawing a globe (make are you label north up). What season do you think it's having now? 4. What seasons do you think the equatorial regions experience? 5. Do both hemispheres experience the same season at a given point of time in a year? 6. Draw diagrams to explain your answer in 5th question, based on your current belief. 46% 48% 6% Question-4 Constant warm/ wet-dry Summer/Winter/Fall no response Question-5 was an unequivocal -“No!”. Similarly, the diagram made for the last question was pretty similar to the samples given below. The explanation given alongside the diagrams (regarding flux) revealed that the argument was quite convincing to them too. Almost everyone answered that their current belief (after attending the theory class) is- the flux change caused by tilt of earth’s rotational axis. Sadly, no one was from the Southern hemisphere. Everyone except two, were from a place in the Northern Hemisphere and predicted that it is experiencing fall. The remaining two were from a place near the Equator. Their predictions are quite similar- “No seasons, but getting a little colder”, “I believe the equatorial regions are also experiencing a mild fall”. The first question aims at understanding the pre-formed mental models and the rest to assess if they’ve understood it properly in the lecture. The response is analyzed by counting the number of students having similar answers. 1). Instead of hand-holding the students through– ‘this is how people usually think and this is the way you should think’, let them postulate their own hypotheses by playing around with the physical parameters [in a simulation perhaps]. This develops their metacognitive skills and gives better self satisfaction than a black-box scaffolding. 2). A considerable amount of time should be spent on negating popular beliefs too. Else their previous mental model might hover unresolved forever. 3). A small portion should be incorporated in the lab work (simulation based ). It could be a take home assignment to track the weather in different places on earth all throughout the semester and then relate it to their geographical attributes. 4). Catchy one-liners do a good job in imprinting themselves in students’ minds but sometimes practicing is the only way to actually understand the concept. As far as pre-formed mental models are concerned, the most prevalent one seems to be- “the closer to the sun, the warmer.” It could be biased because the response was recorded after they learned about most popular misconceptions in the class. Regarding conceptual grasp, the class seems well aware of the key points i.e. the actual reasoning and the diagrams (invariably everyone sketched the exact diagram that is conventionally used for teaching). But, when it comes to applying the concept, the degeneracy breaks. To confirm this, one can elaborate question-4 such that they also reason out their prediction. One can then deduce the mental modes that prevents them to reach to the correct answer. Please note that the way of putting forth the questions might have affected the results (this can be checked by testing the same content with a differently prepared question set). Some probably misunderstood question- 4 as- ‘what season is it in the equator now’. References • “Seasons reasons” (October 2005) retrieved from www.scienceu.com • Jessica Fries-Gaither (August 2011) “Sunrise, Sunset: Learning About Seasons” retrieved from http://beyondpenguins.ehe.osu.edu/ • “The Sun and the Earth” retrieved from http://education.nationalgeographic.org/ • Schoenfeld (1987)- “Metacognition” • Redish (1994)- “Mental Models” • Etkina et al (2005)- “Scaffolding” Template Courtesy- Graphicsland/MakeSigns.com