War On Drugs

War On Drugs
War on Drugs The War on Drugs has been an ongoing affect ever since the Civil War introduced the drug morphine to the world. In the years since
people have been coming up with drugs more lethal than morphine such as cocaine, methamphetamine, heroin, and so on and so forth. The War on
Drugs is dangerous and leads to many deaths throughout the years. America has set up agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and
other drug task force teams throughout the United States. Even though we may not be able to catch all the drug dealers the United States drug teams
has put a tiny dent into this ongoing black market run by cartels and even the smaller drug dealers. In this essay, we will see the effect it has on the
United States, the way...show more content...
If it wasn't for the many different task forces that deals with drug operations like the DEA, then this world would be over filled with major drug
dealers and having an excess stock pile of drugs. The Civil War helped lead this nation into a drug frenzy when it started out with people being
addicted to morphine, using it as a personal use instead for medical purposes. People tend to use drugs for ways to try and get out of depression
and anxiety while overall sometimes leads to happiness and even death. If you would turn on the news, then you could see how many people are
dying from drug overdoses and see how many people are going to jail and prison for drug charges. As we seen in this essay already the number of
people that had went to prison for having drugs in their possession and that is nearly half of the population that we see inside of the prison system's
today. And the most important thing that we see is the effect that it has caused the United States to be in today which is causing the criminal justice
system to be full and spending that extra money on people that were stupid enough to use in the first place. Drugs are always going to be in this world
but how are you going to stop this War on
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

War On Drugs
murder as routine part of lives and running businesses. This violence takes lives of many, including traffickers, police and regular citizens and
contributes to chaos in communities. Although such brutality is not in the best interest of the drug cartels, there are many reasons why it has become
an inevitable part of the drug trade. Skyrocketing demand for illegal drugs and development of new smuggling tactics turned small–scale cocaine
operations into a billion dollar enterprise. It is a highly competitive business and as with any other illicit enterprise, there are no official rules to manage
the disputes and disagreements therefore cartel leaders turn to violence and they are brutal towards anyone who stands between them and their profits.
(Fichtelberg, 2008, p.214)
"War on drugs" is also blamed on escalation of violence.Waging "war on drugs" the United States has been in forefront of drug–related international
policies which resulted in "Americanization" of international law enforcement, relying heavily on various strategies of transnational strategies of
transnational police and custom cooperation and international military interventions. (Franko, 2013, p. 130) Aggressive drug control policies of "war
on drugs" have resulted in a "criminal insurgency", violent confrontations between competing cartels, as well as between them and the Mexican...show
more content...
Growth of imprisonment for drug–related offenses in the United States and other countries did not bring more security to the communities. Problems of
global development and poverty which are largely underestimated by the proponents of the militaristic approach to battling the problems of drug
trafficking are believed to be interconnected with the unstoppable supply of drugs entering the U.S. (Franko, 2013,

AmericaвЂ™s Drug War Essay
The War on Drugs, like the war on Terrorism, is a war that America may not be able to afford to win. For over forty years the United States has been
fighting the War on Drugs and there is no end in sight. It has turned into a war that is about politics and economics rather than about drugs and
criminals. The victims of this war are numerous; but perhaps they are not as numerous as those who benefit from the war itself.
History of U.S Drug Policy:
While laws prohibiting the use of drugs, in one form or another, can be traced back to the 1870s, it was not until 1968, when Richard M. Nixon was
elected President, that our current drug war was conceived. In 1970 Congress passed the Comprehensive Drug Abuse and Control Act.(2) With an
...show more content...
Assistant to Egil Krogh was G. Gordon Liddy. Howard Hunt was a consultant on the drug problem to the president's Domestic Council.
Both of these men would gain fame a few years later as Watergate conspirators. Under these men, instead of being understood as a health and social
problem, drug addiction was defined as a law and order problem.
On July 1, 1973 the War on Drugs was solidified with the creation of the Drug
Enforcement Administration.(15) The DEA, which was the result of merging the Bureau of
Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs with various other law enforcement and intelligence gathering agencies, including the ODALE, was given the
responsibility of enforcing the nation's federal drug laws. It's enormous sphere of influence is reflected in its Mission Statement which states among
other things; "The mission of the Drug Enforcement Administration is to enforce the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States and
bring to the criminal and civil justice system of the United States, or any other competent jurisdiction, those organizations and principal members of
organizations involved in the growing, manufacture, or distribution of controlled substances appearing in or destined for illicit traffic in the United
States..."(15) The DEA was designed as an American agency with an international agenda.
During the Ford and Carter administrations drug use began to rise. In 1979 illicit drug use in the United States peaked

War on Drugs Essay examples
I. Thesis and Literature Summary In our contemporary society, the media constantly bombards us with horror stories about drugs like crack–cocaine.
From them, and probably from no other source, we learn that crack is immediately addictive in every case, we learn that it causes corruption, crazed
violence, and almost always leads to death. The government tells us that we are busy fighting a war on drugs and so it gives us various iconic models
to despise and detest : we learn to stereotype inner–city minorities as being of drug–infested wastelands and we learn to "witchhunt" drug users within
our own communities under the belief that they represent moral sin and pure evil. I believe that these titles and ideals are preposterous...show more
content...
They assert that the government has invested considerably in studies whose results could be used to wage the perennial "war on drugs" while to
politicians, that war has amounted to nothing more than a perceptual war on poverty and urban crime. Since politicians have had little else of
marketable interest to debate over the years, this aggressive attack on drugs has existed as one of their only colorful means by which to create debate,
controversy, and campaign fuel. In other words, when balancing the budget and maintaining an effective foreign policy became two boring to handle,
Reinarman and Levine assert that the "crack epidemic" became the focus of politicians with the intent of luring public interest to their flashy anti–drug
campaigns. Finally, in addition to the media's excess attention on the 'war against drugs,' Reinarman and Levine make the point the constant coverage
of crack in the news media has only been counterproductive to the alleged goals of any anti–drug program. With descriptions of the "crack high" that
glorify it considerably– the politically–charged media campaigns to fight drugs have worked somewhat ironically as huge advertising campaigns for
crack–– increasing public awareness and stimulating the interests of venturous junkies. II. Application of Theoretical Framework While Reinarman and
Levine are rather adamant about

War on Drugs Research Essay
Drug use and abuse is an expensive problem in the United States, both financially and socially. The War on Drugs has been an ongoing effort to
combat drug abuse, drug use and crime associated with the drug trade. It's a war without a clear enemy. Anything waged against a shapeless, intangible
noun can never truly be won – President Clinton's drug czar Gen. Barry McCaffrey said as much in 1996. (TIME 2009) Despite the trillions of
dollars waged on the war on drugs and the countless arrest made related to drugs, it appears that we are fighting a losing battle. The drug battle is not
a new concept it's a battle that has been around since President Eisenhower coined the phrase "War on Drugs". In 1954, President Eisenhower
established the...show more content...
In most high crime areas in big cities, law enforcement and judicial systems spend a majority of their day combating drug related crimes, whether
staking out a dealer on the corner or convicting a dealer for possession, too many of our tax dollars are wasted combating drug crimes. Over half of the
prison inmates incarcerated between 2009 –10 are there due to drug related offenses, costing an average of 6.2 billion dollars annually. And more than
half of those were non–violent offenses (sales, possessions, and attempt to distribute). As noted in the textbook, Drugs and Society, Chapter 3;
proponents contend that if drugs were legalized, violence and crime would become less. Many crimes such as robbery, assault and murder are often
linked to drugs. Perpetrators, rob, steal and kill for the purpose of buying drugs. However, if drugs were legal any and all profits made via the sale of a
drug would directly benefit the economy and stimulate growth for health reform, funding new medical research and abuse prevention programs. The
legalization of drugs would require full governmental control of controlled substances. Just as with alcohol and tobacco government would control age
limits, designated amounts and warnings.
Critics of legalization believe that by legalizing drugs the government sends a negative message to youths that drug use

Drug War Essay
Matt Gifford
Drug War Essay Over the last five decades the United States Congress has enacted a set of counterproductive drug policies collectively regarded as the
war on drugs. These policies generally have two things in common: a heavy dependence on law enforcement, the criminal justice system and the
military in dealing with certain drugs; and a dependence to abstinence only methods to treatment and prevention, to the rejection of proven,
evidence–based interventions. This expensive, disciplinary, zero–tolerance approach has overwhelmingly failed.
Despite the imprisonment of tens of millions of Americans and more than a trillion dollars of spending, illegal drugs remain cheap, potent and widely
available. The harms associated with them...show more content...
Although, there needs to be a combination of strategies to combat the ever increasing flow of drugs into America. Legalization laws could be
controlled and written to include mandated labels with dosage instructions as well as restrictions on advertising. Also age limitations, restrictions on the
amount purchased at one time and requirements on the form supplied could also be imposed. There could also be set laws on banning the sale to
intoxicated individuals and possible licensing requirements to grow, manufacturing and selling of narcotics. There are many drugs are already
available under this partially legalized system such as nicotine, alcohol, caffeine and antibiotics which are supplied under regulations such as these
laws. On the other hand, full legalization would consist of absolutely no government regulation. This type of policy is could also be accepted as the
government has no right to dictate what people put into their bodies. Although even with full legalization there could still be some sort of control
methods as setting regulations as where individuals can use narcotics at. Limiting the use of them to personal residences or facilities that have proper
licensing to sell. When talking about legalization we must take economics into consideration. Supporting drug liberalization could most likely reduce
crime because criminalization supports an increase in crimes such as theft and homicide. In many developing nations,

The War On Drugs Essay
The "War on Drugs" is the name given to the battle of prohibition that the United States has been fighting for over forty years. And it has been
America's longest war. The "war" was officially declared by President Richard Nixon in the 1970's due to the abuse of illegitimate drugs. Nixon
claimed it as "public enemy number one" and enacted laws to fight the importation of narcotics. The United States' War on Drugs began in response to
cocaine trafficking in the late 1980's. As the war continues to go on, winning it hardly seems feasible. As stated by NewsHour, the National Office of
Drug Control Policy spends approximately nineteen billion dollars a year trying to stop the drug trade. The expenses shoot up, indirectly, through crime,
...show more content...
An eighth grader has the ability to obtain heroin or cocaine as effortless as he or she could marijuana. The scary thing is that drugs are so much
stronger, purer, and more deadly than they were decades ago. Can you even imagine children using them and the way they are harming their bodies?
As far as school and their education, what child will learn if they come to school high or intoxicated? Or if they even go to school for that matter. The
programs that the schools have provided, such as D.A.R.E., have proved themselves to be ineffective. There are just as many kids, and that is exactly
what they are, using drugs that have taken the program than the kids that had not participated. It seems that the more the government tried to educate
against drug, the more negative attitudes arose against the police and law enforcement. And with that escalates the positive attitudes towards using
drugs and alcohol, as well as a rise in criminal behavior. As a result in the drug war, education becomes limited to those who actually care to learn.
The drug war has dramatically affected the number of imprisoned Americans, as well as its prisons. According to DrugSense.Org, 1,576,339 people
have been arrested for drug law offenses this year alone. And out of those, 9,261 have been incarcerated. As for marijuana offenses, 747,183 people
have been detained. In fact, most of the non–violent offenders sitting in state, local and federal prisons

Essay on war on drugs
The war on drugs is not a war that can be fought on the beaches of Normandy or in the jungles of Vietnam. It is a war fought in the backyards of all
Americans, every day. This is a war that cannot be won with the aid of nuclear weapons or the help of any other forms of artillery. The number of
casualties, however, will be determined by whether or not the legalization of drugs occurs. Many will suffer the same outcome as a soldier killed in
battle if drugs become legal.      If marijuana and other drugs are legalized, obtaining drugs will be easier for people
of all ages. With the increased use of drugs, there are bound to be more traffic accidents resulting from those who are under the influence of drugs.
Also, if...show more content...
The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse was able to explain in simple English why drugs are illegal in America: "Drugs are
not a threat to American society because they are legal; they are illegal because they are a threat to American society" (Marbry par. 16).
Drugs corrupt the minds of even the most honest American citizens. Making drugs legal could put the life of any American at risk.
     Some drugs that are in the process of possibly being legalized for medicinal use are also a threat to
American life. Marijuana is the most popular of drugs that can be used for medicinal purposes. Though the dosage prescribed would not be
permanently harmful to the patient, it would be very easy for him to become dependent on the drug. Marijuana is known as a gateway drug,
meaning that its effects are relatively mild. After a long period of usage, its effects decrease leaving the user in want of a bigger high. This craving
leads drug users to heavier drugs such as heroin, cocaine, or LCD. (Schwebel 87). After awhile, even the heavy drugs begin to lose their potency. To
deal with the deprivation of bigger highs, users usually begin taking larger dosages, which may lead to an overdose and death. The legalization of
even medicinal drugs could easily lead to more deaths from drug related illnesses or overdose.      A major cause for
concern in the United States is the number of lives taken by drunk drivers.

End The War On Drugs Essay
End the War on Drugs The war on drugs dates back to 1971, when President Richard Nixon first popularized it. His presidency and administration
were primarily responsible for getting the ball rolling. Following his presidency, every administration has more or less doubled down on his stance
on the war on drugs. It has become a hot political issue that politicians now use to swing votes by the use of "fear" and promises of "safety".
However, the reality is that we are not anymore safe than we were in the 70's. Drug use is still rampant. Users are still able to obtain what they so
desire. The only thing that has changed is the amount of individuals we are putting behind bars, the amount of debt our country takes on every year,
and countless other waste of resources that produce minimal return. Ultimately, it has done more harm than good for this country. Collectively, over
the last 50 years, the war on drugs has led to the development of many policies that have had a detrimental effect on our society 's well–being, and that
is why we should end the war on drugs. Over the last 40 years, the United States has spent over a trillion dollars trying to enforce drug laws. Every
year, 15 billion dollars is spent just in the United States and 100 billion dollars globally trying to enforce drug laws (count the costs). This would be
fine if the result of this expenditure produced any beneficial return, but historically, the drug problem is as big as it was during the nixon

War On Drugs

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

War On Drugs