SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 80
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
Dublin Institute of Technology
The School of Electrical Engineer Systems
In Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Services
and Energy Management
Title: To evaluate the Potential of CHP
in the Hotel sector in Ireland
By: Mr. Paul Derwin
Project Supervisor: Tony Kealy
Date: 7 / 05 / 2013
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 ii
Declaration
I hereby certify that the material, which is submitted in this assignment/project, is
entirely my own work and has not been submitted for any academic assessment other
than as part fulfillment of the assessment procedures for the program Bachelor of
Science in Electrical Services and Energy Management (BSc (Hons)) (DT 018).
Signature of student: Paul Derwin
Date: 7 / 05 / 2013
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 iii
Foreword and Acknowledgement
The objective of this dissertation is to provide an insight in to small-scale combined
heat and power development in the hotel sector in Ireland by analysing recent CHP
project in the hotel sector.
I would like to sincerely thank Mr. Tony Kealy in his role as supervisor throughout
the thesis. Without his guidance and knowledge, I would not have completed it, the
staff at the Osprey Hotel and facilities manager, Mr. Kieran Maher for providing me
with his time, information and assistance throughout the thesis and Mr. Martin Barrett
in his role as Lecturer, for his assistance, guidance during the project proposal.
I would also like to thank my fellow classmates as well for any guidance that I would
have received from them. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for
their support, patience and understanding throughout my college tenure.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 iv
Table of Contents
Declaration..................................................................................................................... ii
Foreword and Acknowledgement ..................................................................................iii
Table of Contents.......................................................................................................... iv
List of Tables ................................................................................................................vii
List of Figures ..............................................................................................................viii
Glossary of Terms..........................................................................................................x
Abstract ......................................................................................................................... xi
Chapter 1: Introduction................................................................................................12
2.0 Chapter 2: Literature Review.................................................................................13
2.1 What is Combined Heat and Power ...................................................................13
2.2 CHP in Ireland ...................................................................................................13
2.2.1 CHP in Europe ............................................................................................16
2.3 Benefits of Implementing CHP..........................................................................17
2.4 CHP Technology................................................................................................18
2.4.1 Prime Mover ...............................................................................................18
2.4.2 Electrical Generator ....................................................................................19
2.4.3 Heat Recovery Equipment ..........................................................................19
2.5 CHP Range.........................................................................................................20
2.6 Barriers to developing CHP ...............................................................................20
2.6.1 Awareness and Information Barriers ..........................................................21
2.7 Climate Change..................................................................................................22
2.7.1 Environmental Aspects of CHP ..................................................................24
2.8 National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020 .........................................25
2.8.1 Energy Policies ...........................................................................................25
2.9 Connection to the Electricity Grid Network ......................................................26
2.9.1 Connection Application Process .................................................................27
2.9.2 Requirements for Protection of Embedded CHP Installations ...................28
2.9.3 Synchronising .............................................................................................29
2.10 Combined Heat & Power Deployment Programme.........................................29
2.11 Sizing a CHP Plant...........................................................................................30
2.12 Reviewing CHP Case Study’s Carried Out in the Hotel Sector ......................31
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 v
2.12.1 Jury’s Hotel and Towers – Dublin ............................................................31
2.12.2 Project Description....................................................................................31
2.12.3 Plant Operation .........................................................................................31
2.12.4 Project Results ..........................................................................................32
3.0 Chapter 3: Methodology ........................................................................................33
3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................33
3.2 Research Objectives...........................................................................................33
3.3 Methods for Collecting Data..............................................................................34
3.4 Project Description.............................................................................................35
4.0 Chapter Four: Data Collection ...............................................................................37
4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................37
4.2 CHP Operation...................................................................................................37
4.3 Sizing of the CHP Plant .....................................................................................37
4.4 CHP Description................................................................................................38
4.5 CHP Control System..........................................................................................38
4.6 F4 Energy Remote Monitoring ..........................................................................42
4.7 Heat Meter..........................................................................................................42
4.8 Gas Meter...........................................................................................................43
4.9 Acoustic and Vibration Attenuation ..................................................................43
5.0 Chapter Five: Data analysis and Discussion of Results .........................................45
5.1 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 ................................................................45
5.2 Simple Payback Calculations.............................................................................46
5.2.1 Net Present Value Payback Calculations ....................................................47
5.3 Electrical and Gas Energy Consumption for 2011 ............................................48
5.4 Analysis of the Electrical Energy Costs.............................................................49
5.4.1 Analysis of the Gas Energy Costs...............................................................50
5.4.2 CHP Fuel Input ...........................................................................................51
5.5 Building Energy Benchmarking ........................................................................51
5.6 Maintenance and Servicing................................................................................51
5.7 Environmental Benefits of the CHP Plant .........................................................53
5.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Grid Electricity.........................54
5.7.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Saved by using CHP Plant .............................54
5.7.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Natural Gas ..............................54
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 vi
5.7.4 Osprey Hotel Carbon Footprint ..................................................................54
5.8 Osprey Hotel CHP Plant Efficiency ..................................................................55
6.0 Chapter Six: Conclusion and Summary.................................................................56
7.0 Bibliography...........................................................................................................58
8.0 Appendices.............................................................................................................61
9.0 Thesis Schedule......................................................................................................79
9.1 Student-Supervisor Log Report .........................................................................79
9.2 Student Log Report for Thesis...........................................................................80
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 vii
List of Tables
Table 1 CHP Number of Units and Operational Capacity by Fuel 2011 (SEAI, 2012)
..............................................................................................................................14
Table 2 R.Evans (1993) Environmental & Economic Implications of Small-Scale
CHP, Energy Policy.............................................................................................25
Table 3 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator
interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). ...........................................29
Table 4 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator
interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). ...........................................29
Table 5 CHP plant operation........................................................................................37
Table 6 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 .............................................................46
Table 7 Hotel Expenditure for 2011 ............................................................................46
Table 8 NPV method using discounted cash flow .......................................................47
Table 9 Electrical and gas consumption in KWh for 2011..........................................48
Table 10 CO2 emission factors by fuel type (Electric Ireland)(CIBSE Guide F) ........53
Table 11 Osprey Hotel carbon footprint ......................................................................54
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 viii
List of Figures
Figure 1 CHP fuel and Thermal/Electrical output in Ireland 1994-2011 (SEAI, 2012)
..............................................................................................................................15
Figure 2 CHP electricity as % of total electricity generated in Ireland (SEAI, 2012).15
Figure 3 Combined heat and power generation in Europe, 2010 (Eurostat, 2012) .....16
Figure 4 Sankey Diagram (SEAI, 2006)......................................................................17
Figure 5 Energy Related CO2 Emissions by Sector (SEAI, 2012) ..............................24
Figure 6 Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa..............................................................................35
Figure 7 Ariel View of the Osprey Complex...............................................................35
Figure 8 Simplified diagram of typical low voltage combined heat and power
electrical system (Source: CIBSE AM12) ...........................................................39
Figure 9 Mains Incomer and switch fuse for CHP plant .............................................39
Figure 10 CHP Control Interface Display Units..........................................................40
Figure 11 Schmitt Enertec Monitoring Unit interface .................................................41
Figure 12 CF Echo 11 Ultrasonic Heats and Cooling Meter .......................................42
Figure 13 Itron MZ turbine gas meter..........................................................................43
Figure 14 CHP Plant located in the Osprey underground car park..............................44
Figure 15 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011..........................................................45
Figure 16 Electricity and gas consumption..................................................................48
Figure 17 Typical F4energy service report..................................................................52
Figure 18 Maintenance Schedule, front page...............................................................52
Figure 19 Bord Gais Energy, Gas Bill for November 2011 ........................................61
Figure 20 Energia Electricity Bill for November 2011 ...............................................62
Figure 21 Bord Gais Energy Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
..............................................................................................................................63
Figure 22 Energia Electricity Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
..............................................................................................................................64
Figure 23 CHP Plant Specifications ............................................................................65
Figure 24 Schematic Diagram of the CHP plant Designed by Schmitt Enertec..........66
Figure 25 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form .......................................................67
Figure 26 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form Part 1.............................................68
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 ix
Figure 27 ESB Networks Application Fees for Embedded Generators, Approved by
the CER................................................................................................................69
Figure 28 Fossil and electric building benchmarks (CIBSE guide F) .........................70
Figure 29 SEAI comparison of energy costs (SEAI)...................................................71
Figure 30 Business electricity prices in band IC in 2011 ............................................72
Figure 31 CHP Name Plate..........................................................................................72
Figure 32 CO2 emissions conversion factors by fuel type (Part L2A Building
Regulations) .........................................................................................................73
Figure 33 CHP plant ....................................................................................................73
Figure 34 CHP user interface.......................................................................................74
Figure 35 CHP located beside the hotels main distribution board...............................74
Figure 36 CHP water inlet ...........................................................................................75
Figure 37 typical service reports..................................................................................75
Figure 38 typical service reports..................................................................................76
Figure 39 Service report check sheet ...........................................................................76
Figure 40 typical service reports..................................................................................77
Figure 41 typical service reports..................................................................................78
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 x
Glossary of Terms
KWh – Kilowatt-hour
M3 – Cubic Meter
CHP – Combined Heat and Power
Cogeneration – Using a heat engine to simultaneously produce heat electricity
MIC – Maximum Import Capacity
PSO – Public Service Obligation
CER – Commission for Energy Regulation
CENELEC – European Committee for Electro technical Standardisation
SEAI – Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland
KW – Kilowatt
ESB – Electricity Supply Board
GHG – Greenhouse gases
NVP – Net Present Value
SPB – Simple Payback
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency
KWe – CHP electricity capacity
KWth – CHP thermal capacity
V – Volts
DUoS – Distribution System Operation
TUoS – Transmission System Operator
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency
ICHPA – Irish Combined Heat & Power Association
SEI – Sustainable Energy Ireland
SO2 – Sulphur Dioxide
CO2 – Carbon Dioxide
NO2 – Nitrogen Dioxide
CO – Carbon Monoxide
CH4 – Methane
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 xi
Abstract
This paper examines how Combined Heat and Power benefits the hotel sector in
Ireland. The cast study will be carried out on the Naas Osprey Hotel and Spa in
County Kildare. The energy savings as a result of the CHP plant were evaluated.
Billing information for period of 12 months during 2011 was gathered and analysed.
As a result of installing the CHP plant in the Osprey hotel, the hotels daytime ESB
consumption is significantly reduced and with the displaced grid electricity the
Osprey CHP plant reduces the site’s carbon emissions per annum.
The author will use two fundamental evaluative approaches in this research:
 Qualitative, which will include surveys, historical research and
 Quantitive, which will include Case Studies, spreadsheets and charts
illustrating recorded data.
A feasibility study will be drawn up by the author, which will incorporate a12-month
historic gas and electricity energy consumption by the Osprey hotel.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 12
Chapter 1: Introduction
This research aims to investigate the energy performance of Gas powered Combined
Heat and Power plant. It is hoped that the results of this research will benefit both
building facilities manager and energy managers alike, by delivering a greater
understanding of the operation and design of a CHP system, and the potential energy
saving costs that can be implemented.
Due to current economic and environmental reasons, companies and organisations
worldwide are constantly under pressure to reduce their energy consumption. As
energy cost is the primary expense for these companies and organisations, a reduction
in energy consumption will lead to a reduction in their operating cost base, which will
ultimately lead to a more profitably business model. A reduction in energy
consumption can be achieved by many means, but in particular, the implementation of
energy efficiency and energy conservation programs within the company or
organisation, will lead to a promotion of efficient and effective energy use.
The Directive 2004 / 8 / EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 11
February 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on useful heat demand in the
internal energy market and amending Directive 92 / 42 / EEC states;
“The potential for use of cogeneration as a measure to save energy is underused in the
Community at present. Promotion of high-efficiency cogeneration based on a useful
heat demand is a Community priority given the potential benefits of cogeneration
with regard to saving primary energy, avoiding network losses and reducing
emissions, in particular of greenhouse gases. In addition, efficient use of energy by
cogeneration can also contribute positively to the security of energy supply and to the
competitive situation of the European Union and its Member States. It is therefore
necessary to take measures to ensure that the potential is better exploited within the
framework of the internal energy market”.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 13
2.0 Chapter 2: Literature Review
The purpose of this literature review is to provide relevant information on the theory
and concepts behind the use of Combined Heat and Power systems and the analysis of
standards and codes of practice carried out in the area of small-scale Combined Heat
and Power systems in the hotel sector in Ireland. (SEAI, 2012) (Horlock, 1997)
2.1 What is Combined Heat and Power
“CHP, also referred to as ‘cogeneration’ or ‘total energy’, is the simultaneous
generation of usable heat and power within a single process. The Power generated is
usually electricity, but can also be mechanical power for driving equipment such as
pumps, compressors and fans” (Carbon Trust, 2012).
CHP is a single process where by simultaneous generation of electricity and heat is
achieved. The CHP unit typically replaces the oil or gas boiler and is extensively used
in commercial and industrial premises.
The CHP plant is versatile piece of equipment it can run on natural gas, biogas or
diesel. The type and range of CHP available are,
 Micro CHP (≤ 5kWe)
 Small-scale CHP (≤ 2 MWe)
- Spark Ignition engines
- Micro-turbines (30 - 100 kWe)
- Small scale gas turbines (500 kWe)
 Large-scale (> 2 MWe)
-Large reciprocating engines
-Large gas turbines (Carbon Trust, 2004).
2.2 CHP in Ireland
According to the SEAI “the installed capacity of CHP in Ireland at the end of 2011
was 326 MWe (262 CHP units) up from 307 MWe (227 units) in 2010, an increase of
6.2 %. However the 2011 installed capacity figures, of the 262 CHP units 189 of them
were reported as being in operation. The operational installed capacity increased by
22 MWe, to 304 MWe, in 2011 compared with 2010.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 14
Table 1 CHP Number of Units and Operational Capacity by Fuel 2011 (SEAI, 2012)
According to the SEAI report labeled “Combined Heat and Power in Ireland, 2012
update”, in 2010 hotels (40 %) and leisure centers (20 %) account for the majority of
CHP units in the services sector closely followed by hospitals (17 %). These sites
benefit from having CHP systems because of the constant demand for heat and power.
Other sub-sectors include, education and office (both 6 %), airport (2 %), retail (3 %)
and other services (5 %).
The single CHP unit (160 MWe) in Aughinish Alumina plant in Limerick accounts
for 63.4 % of the total operational capacity in the industrial sector, and the food
processing plants accounting for 23.3 % (12 units).
In December 2005 an Irish government supported grant scheme was announced to run
between 2006 and 2010, to assist businesses in Ireland in the deployment of CHP
across the country.
The program objectives include;
 Increase deployment of small-scale, fossil fuel and biomass CHP systems in
industrial, commercial and public sectors.
 Reduce carbon emissions and fossil fuel consumption.
 Increase electricity system security via more diversity of local embedded
generating plants.
 Increase awareness in CHP systems.
The funding available depends on the type of project and technologies used, up to 30
% investment support for small-scale (≥ 50 kWe and < 1 MWe) fossil fired CHP
projects. (SEAI, 2010)
According to the 2012 report on Combined Heat and Power in Ireland the SEAI CHP
deployment programme was stopped on December 2010. It was noted that 68 (fossil-
fueled) small-scale CHP projects with a total 157.7 MWe, biomass CHP (3 MWe
capacity), and anaerobic digestion CHP (250 kMe capacity) benefited from this
program (SEAI, 2012).
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 15
Figure 1 CHP fuel and Thermal/Electrical output in Ireland 1994-2011 (SEAI, 2012)
The above chart illustrates the CHP contribution to Irelands energy requirement
between 1994 and 2011. It can be seen that the large increase in 2006 is accounted for
the Aughinish Alumina plant (160 MWe) that became operational at that time. Fuel
inputs have increased by 156 %, thermal and electrical outputs increased by 182 %
and 654 % respectively over the period 1994 to 2011. (SEAI, 2012)
Figure 2 CHP electricity as % of total electricity generated in Ireland (SEAI, 2012)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 16
2.2.1 CHP in Europe
Figure 3 Combined heat and power generation in Europe, 2010 (Eurostat, 2012)
It is noted in the Eurostat report on “Energy, transport and environment indicators that
in 2010, combined heat and power generation in the European Union generated 11.7
% of gross electricity. “The share of electricity produced by cogeneration processes
varied from 1 % in Cyprus to 49.2 % in Denmark. From 2005 to 2010, the highest
increase in CHP share was recorded in Lithuania (34.6 % in 2010 from 15.5 % in
2005) and Latvia (45.0 % in 2010 from 30.7 % in 2005). On the contrary, the highest
decrease was reported by Romania (10.8 % in 2010 from 26.2 % in 2005)”. (Eurostat,
2012).
In Ireland 6.8% of electricity was generated by CHP plants in 2010. In 2010, 14 of the
CHP plants were exporting 1,347 GWh of electricity to the grid. (SEAI, 2012)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 17
2.3 Benefits of Implementing CHP
Figure 4 Sankey Diagram (SEAI, 2006)
Combined Heat and Power offers plenty of benefits over traditional boilers and
electric only systems. The above diagram illustrates the reduced energy consumption
of a CHP unit (80 % efficient) compared with separate production of heat and
electricity, which has losses of up to 41 %.
According to the Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA), CHP provides the
following benefits: (SEAI, 2012)
 Minimum 10 % energy savings but its is generally higher
 Up to 40 % cost savings on electricity generated from the CHP unit over
electricity from the grid
 Minimum of 10 % CO2 savings in comparison to other methods of thermal and
electrical generation
 Up to 80 % efficient
 Guarantee of electrical and thermal energy for the consumer
 Reliable technology with established supplier base.
 A reduction in the cost of energy, improving the competitiveness of industry
and business, helping to mitigate fuel poverty.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 18
 CHP is versatile and can be coupled with existing and planned technologies
for many different applications in the industrial, commercial and residential
sectors (CHPA, 2013)
2.4 CHP Technology
The basic components of a CHP unit are (1) The Prime Mover, (2) An Electrical
Generator and (3) The Heat Recovery Equipment. There are a number of different
types of prime mover, which vary from an internal combustion engine, steam turbine,
gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbines or fuel cells. The electrical generator that
converts the mechanical energy from the prime mover to electrical energy is either a
synchronous generator, which is a stand-alone type, or an asynchronous generator that
requires a connection to the electrical grid and will shut down in the event of a power
outage.
According to the Irish CHP Association, for the natural gas-fired CHP system to be
technically and economically feasible, it generally requires a simultaneous demand
for heat and electricity on the premises, for a minimum of 14 hours per day or 5000
hours per year. (SEAI, 2000)
2.4.1 Prime Mover
In the hotel sector small scale CHP units are preferred, where there is always a steady
demand for heat and power throughout the year. Small-scale CHP units consist of an
internal combustion engine or gas turbines. Gas turbines are available from 100 KW
to 100 MW. The heat to power ratio is from 1 to 3. In the gas combustion process the
air to fuel ratio is 100 to 1, the exhaust gas contains high levels of nitrogen and
oxygen. This may be classed as hot air, which is suitable for processing and heating
purposes. Gas turbines require frequent maintenance schedules required between
20,000 - 70,000 hours of operation.
Other types of prime mover are the spark ignited gas engines operated on mains gas,
or the larger sized CHP unit use diesel engines. These reciprocating engines are
available in many sizes, which range from as low as 6 KW to 200 MW. The
reciprocating engines are liquid cooled and the same liquid is used as a secondary
source of thermal energy with the hot exhaust gases. The maintenance on the
reciprocating engines is not a complicated as the gas turbine but may be more
frequent with higher costs involved.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 19
2.4.2 Electrical Generator
The generator converts the mechanical shaft power of the prime mover into electrical
energy. The generators used in CHP systems are either synchronous or asynchronous.
Synchronous generators can operate completely independently of the grid and may be
used for standby electrical generation. They require a battery to start, are more
complex and therefore are expensive. (Hodkinson, 2008)
Asynchronous generators use the mains as the excitation current and therefore require
connection to the grid and will shut down in the event of a power outage; they cannot
be used as a standby generator. In many cases the manufacturer of the prime mover
and generator as an integrated, packaged assembly known as a genset. If the CHP is to
be used as for standby capacity, a second back up CHP unit may be required so in the
event of maintenance down time the facility is still able to avail of CHP generated
electrical and thermal energy. (Hodkinson, 2008)
2.4.3 Heat Recovery Equipment
The second stage of the CHP generating electricity is to recover and use the exhaust
heat energy from the prime mover of the CHP unit. The successful operation of the
CHP plant depends on the use of the heat produced by generating electricity. The
simplest model is where the heat exchanger transfers the heat from the exhaust gases
and engine water jacket to the boiler feed water to raise the temperature of the boiler
feed water this water temperature is typically 70 to 850 C. (Hodkinson, 2008)
When the heat is removed from the exhaust gases, the gas is discharged via a chimney
into the atmosphere. Heat exchangers can come in different forms, the most common
are,
 Shell and tube
 Plate
 Cooling coil types.
The heat exchangers performance depends on size of the heat transfer area; in some
cases the heat recovery unit is larger than the fuel-burning unit to maximize the heat
transfer, and an important variable is the temperature gradient. Liquids with greater
temperature difference between hot and cool streams result in greater heat transfer
rates. (Fin, 2010)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 20
2.5 CHP Range
 GE’s Jenbacher Type 2 Gas Engine
The Jenbacher type 2, gas engine was introduced in 1976 and its power output
ranges from 250 to 350 kW. The CHP IS robust and has a guarantee of 60,000
operating hours before first major overhaul. Total efficiency is 89.1 %
(General Electric, 2013).
 GE’s Jenbacher Type 3 Gas Engine
The Jenbacher Type 3 offers power in the range of 500 to 1,100 kW. Long
service intervals and has a maintenance-friendly engine design. The total
efficiency is up to 87.1 %. Fuel type is biogas, coke gas, natural gas, propane,
landfill gas, sewage gas and special gases (e.g., coal mine gas, coke gas wood
gas pyrolysis gas) (General Electric, 2013).
 GE’s Jenbacher type 4 Gas Engine
Based on the design of types 3 and 6 the type 4 is a modern engine in the 800
to 1500 kW power range with a total efficiency of up to 86.2 %. The type 4
engine gas types are, natural gas flare gas, biogas, landfill gas and coke gas.
The heat recovery system is a two-stage oil plate heat exchanger (General
Electric, 2013).
2.6 Barriers to developing CHP
According to the CHP policy group report in February 2006, there is a lot of potential
for development of CHP, but only a small number of new CHP units will be
commissioned in the next couple of years, giving market barriers, economic return
and investment risks that potential CHP developers face. The CHP project investment
decision will be based on a comparison of the financial cost and risks of importing the
electricity requirement for a site and producing heat internally from heat only-boilers
or operating a CHP scheme supplemented by imported or exported electricity as
required.
The barriers and risks to implementing CHP in the hotel sector depend on typically on
gas market price volatility that could deter potential investors.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 21
A sudden increase in natural gas could result in an increased cost in meeting their
energy needs. Since gas is the fuel choice for the majority of CHP plants, the
relationship between gas and electricity prices is critical to the CHP project. This is
also known as spark-spread. The economics of a CHP investment is more viable when
spark-spread is high, what this means is then the gas price is lower in comparison to
the electricity price. For smaller CHP users, when the spark-spread is low the
financial attractiveness of the small-scale CHP unit is reduced.
2.6.1 Awareness and Information Barriers
If the installed capacityof CHP in Ireland is to grow significantly it is necessary to
increase the level of awareness and information available. This can be achieved by
introducing marketing programs, guidelines and feasibility studies.
COGEN Europe is the European Association, for the Promotion of CHP projects. It is
a Belgian non-profit organisation. Its aims are to work towards the wider use of CHP
in Europe for a sustainable energy future. COGEN works at EU level with member
states to develop energy policies and reduce the numbers of barriers to implementing
CHP systems. The organisation is also responsible for annual conferences on
cogeneration in Europe (COGEN Europe, 2013).
An independent body called the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) was
established in 1999 under the electricity regulation act 1999. Its principle aim is to
protect the interests of the existing and future customers. This is achieved by
providing security of supply of energy services. Also by moving towards increased
levels of renewable energy and reduced carbon emissions. The CER responsibilities
are to ensure sufficient capacity in the systems to satisfy reasonable demands for
supply for natural gas and electricity, to protect the interests of customers, including
the elderly and disadvantaged in rural areas, promoting competition in electricity and
gas markets and promoting research and the use of sustainable forms of energy that
reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as adopting measures to protect the
environment in all sectors in Ireland.
Recently the CER has recently presented its five-year strategic plan for the 2010 -
2014 period. The commission has outlined 6 goals, under strategic goal 4, which is to
ensure that:
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 22
 “The environment is protected”
 “Actions 4.2 Renewables & Climate Change Package”
-“4.2.1 we will ensure full implementation of the relevant aspects of the
renewables and climate change package in the electricity and gas sectors”
-“4.2.2 we will also challenge the sector to develop a formal environmental
vision for the electricity industry in particular, where reducing emission in an
integrated system is central, while not impacting on competitiveness. We hope
to see initiatives from the energy sector in this area” (CER, 2009).
 4.5 Demand Side Participation
-“We will make customers more energy aware and will encourage all
participants in the energy sector to deliver improved information on energy
efficiency, demand side participation and the environmental impact of the
energy sector to their customers. We will prioritise increased focus on the
importance of Demand Side Management Participation over the course of this
plan” (CER, 2009).
2.7 Climate Change
In April 2007 the Irish government published the National Climate Change Strategy
2007-2012. This strategy sets out measures that will allow Ireland to reduce its
greenhouse gas emissions meeting its Kyoto Protocol commitments. This National
Climate Change Strategy is updated from the first strategy published by the
government in 2000. The purpose of this strategy is to show the measures by which
Ireland will meet its 2008-2012 commitments and to show how these measures
position the country beyond 2012 and identify measures being researched and
developed that will meet our eventual 2020 commitment (Department of the
Environment, Heritage and Local Government, 2007).
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 23
Sir Nicholas Stern’s 700-page report to the UK Government on October 30th 2006, on
the Economics of Climate Change ‘The Stern Review’ concluded:
“The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious
global risks, and it demands an urgent global response”.
Since 1990 the greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland have raised considerably. This
rise was mainly caused by a large increase in C02 emissions compared to other gases
such as methane and nitrous oxides, which have remained more or less the same.
Irelands CO2 emissions increase between 1990 and 2001 is as result of strong
economic growth.
In 1990, CO2 contributed 58.5 %, methane and nitrous oxides combined together
totaled 41.4%, and F-gases (HFC, PFC, SF6 ) 3 contributed 1/ 1000th of all green house
gas emissions. By 2004 CO2 emissions contribution increased to 66.1 %, methane and
nitrous oxides dropped to 32.9 % while the F-gases contribution was 1 %
(IEA/OECD, 2007).
In figure 5 on the following page the graph displays a sectorial breakdown of the
energy related CO2 emissions (96 % of energy related green house gases) and nitrous
oxide and methane (remaining 4 % of energy related green house gases). According
to the Energy in Ireland report prepared by the SEAI, the largest sectorial increase is
in the transport sector, but since 2009 this has declined by 11.2 % and accounts for
over one third of energy related CO2 emissions in 2011 while agriculture represents
the lowest energy related CO2 emissions by sector (SEAI, 2012).
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 24
Figure 5 Energy Related CO2
Emissions by Sector (SEAI, 2012)
2.7.1 Environmental Aspects of CHP
CHP represents a highly efficient use of energy, which reduces the combustion
products per unit of energy produced compared to traditional oil fired boilers and
electricity generation stations. Consequently CHP will bring environmental benefits
in the form of CO2 savings.
The amount of CO2 savings resulting from CHP is difficult to calculate. A number of
factors depend on such as:
 The mix of electricity production in the country
 The most marginal power plant on the system
 The next power plant to be built by the power industry
 The best theoretical power plant available. (Irish Energy Centre, 2001)
The environmental benefits of installing CHP systems in Ireland are shown in table 2
on the following page, the emissions savings are only suggested and may vary.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 25
Table 2 R.Evans (1993) Environmental & Economic Implications of Small-Scale CHP, Energy Policy
Emissions Estimated net reduction in emissions per kWh of
electricity produced (g/kWh)
CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) 1000
SO2 (Sulfur Dioxide) 17
NO2 (Nitrogen Dioxide) 4.6
CO (Carbon Monoxide) (3)
CH4 (Methane) 3.9
2.8 National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020
It is noted in the national energy efficiency action plan that fossil fuels accounted for
96% of all energy use in Ireland in 2007. With the rising oil and gas prices, measures
need to be in place to move towards a sustainable energy future.
According to the NEEAP the most cost effective measure of reducing Irelands
dependence on fossil fuels is energy efficiency.
The government has committed to achieve a 20 % reduction in energy demand by
2020 through implementing energy efficiency measures. The 20 % reduction equates
to 31925 Gig watt hours saved.
The national energy efficiency action plan has outlined 90 actions, measures and
programs, which will help reduce Irelands energy demand and reach the national
target set by the action plan. (Dep. of Communications, Energy and Natural
Resources, 2009)
2.8.1 Energy Policies
The Kyoto Protocol was agreed upon in Kyoto, Japan on December 1997. On
February 16th 2009, 183 states signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol to the United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), aimed at combating
global warming.
The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37
industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions. As stated by the UNFCC these amount to an average of 5% against 1990
levels over the five-year period 2008-2012. (United Nations, 2012)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 26
The Kyoto Protocol requires the significant reduction in Irish emissions of GHG’s or
pays hefty fines. Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries are required to
reduce the emissions of six greenhouse gases (CO2, which is the most important one,
methane, nitrous oxide, hydro fluorocarbons, per fluorocarbons and sulphur
hexafluoride) on average by 5.2 % below the 1990 levels during the first
“commitment period” from 2008 to 2012.
A five-year commitment period was chosen rather than a single target year to smooth
out annual fluctuations in emissions due to uncontrollable factors such as weather.
(United Nations Framework Convention, 2011)
Key measures published by the National Climate Change Strategy 2007 – 2012
include production of electricity from renewable sources to increase to 15 % by 2010
and 33 % by 2020 Biomass to contribute up to 30 % of energy input at peat stations
by 2015 and support for Combined Heat and Power projects. Measures for industrial,
Commercial and Services, include building regulations and building energy rating,
energy agreements programme, bio heat and CHP programs and support for eco-
efficient technology and practices (Department of the Environment, Heritage and
Local Government, 2007)
The EU Emissions Trading Scheme came into operation in January 2005, and under
this scheme the C02 emissions of 12,000 installations across the EU are controlled on
a cap and trade basis, over 100 installations in Ireland are in the scheme. The
installation has to monitor its emissions and report the total emissions on an annual
basis. The installation is the required to surrender allowances, where one allowance
equals one tonne of CO2, if the installation cannot reduce its emissions during the
course of the year more allowances must be bought or face high penalty fines. This
strategy sets out to reduce emissions by 0.6 million tonnes in the industrial,
commercial and services sector out of a total 3.02 million tonnes by 2012.
2.9 Connection to the Electricity Grid Network
The Commissioner for Energy Regulation (CER) is responsible for overseeing the
regulation of Ireland’s electricity and gas sectors. The Commission was initially
established and granted regulatory powers over the electricity market under the
Electricity Regulation Act, 1999.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 27
The CER published a revised process for the authorization and licensing of generation
stations CER / 07 / 128 on the 30th of August 2007. The target audience is the owners
and installers of small-scale and micro generation (CHP plants). The paper clarifies:
 “In the decision paper CER / 07 / 128, the Commission directed that
generators with a capacity not exceeding 1 MW will be deemed to be duly
authorised and/or licensed by way of Order(s) issued pursuant to Section 14
(1A) and Section 16 (3A) of the Electricity Regulation Act 1999” (CER,
2008).
 “Generators not exceeding 1 MW will be subject to specific terms and
conditions as set out in the Orders but will not be required to notify the
Commission in order to stand duly authorised and/or licensed” (CER, 2008).
Sites with an existing connection seeking to install a small-scale CHP plant should
only require a modification to their connection agreement. However a completed
connection application form should be submitted regardless. If the site does not have
an existing connection, the generator connection application can be made along with
an application for a demand connection.
2.9.1 Connection Application Process
 Step 1: Get an ordnance survey map and site plan
The start of the application process is for the new or existing customer to get an
ordnance survey map and site plan (1 : 2500 - 1 : 10560) which will highlight (in red)
the location of the new CHP plant.
 Step 2: Complete application form
Complete the ESB Networks application form (NC5), The form should be submitted
in situations where an applicant considers that they may be eligible for the connection
process outside the group processing approach. The advantage is that the application
may avoid the full rigors of the group processing rules.
 Step 3: Return the application form
The application form, along with a non-refundable deposit of 7000 euro is to be sent
to ESB Networks in Athlone, Co. Westmeath.
 Step 4: Receive a quotation and connection agreement
Receive an acknowledgement and reference number
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 28
- Connection Quotation
The application fees for embedded generations are shown in the appendices
- Connection Agreement
The connection agreement will include the Maximum Import Capacity (MIC) and the
Maximum Export Capacity (MEC).
 Step 5: Return payment
Post the payment and connection agreement to the ESB.
 Step 6: Witness test date
The technical data from the completed application will be evaluated to ensure there
are no technical or protection omissions, which may need to be corrected prior to the
witness test date (ESB Networks, 2010).
2.9.2 Requirements for Protection of Embedded CHP Installations
The conditions governing connection to the distribution system is a document set out
by ESB Networks lists requirements for customer’s equipment at the interface
between the distribution system and the customer’s installation. Associated
documentation with these conditions includes S.I. No. 44 /1993 – Safety, Health and
Welfare At Work Regulations, 1993.
“All electrical equipment and electrical installations shall at all times be so
(a) Constructed,
(b) Installed,
(c) Maintained,
(d) Protected, and
(e) Used
So as to prevent danger.” (Irish Statute Book, 1993)
Generator protection is designed to disconnect the CHP plant from the ESB
network, during irregular system conditions by tripping the main incoming
circuit breaker or generator circuit breaker. The CHP plant interface objective
is to protect the safety of ESB employees, the public and the network
distribution system and also offers protection to the customers CHP plant and
employees.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 29
Table 3 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection
devices (ESB Networks, 2006).
Devices Requirement
Protection
Devices
Independent of other equipment and protection
Located in a separate and secure compartment that can be sealed
Provide backup protection to ensure isolation of the generator
Comply with IEC Standard 60255
Table 4 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection
devices (ESB Networks, 2006).
Devices Requirement
Relays Protection Grade
Visible indication of operation
Accessible from ground level
Clearly identified
Monitor installation at ESB networks distribution connection voltage
unless otherwise agreed between ESB networks and customer
Monitor line voltage for under and over voltage protection in MV and
38kV installations
Prevent re-closure of generator or main incomer CB until all relays
have reset correctly
2.9.3 Synchronising
 The synchronising facilities shall be provided on either the generator circuit
breaker or the main incoming circuit breaker and synchronization should be
fully automatic.
 The operation of the switchgear where the customers could parallel
unsynchronized generator equipment with ESB networks system shall be
prevented by check synchronising facilities, or by the use of mechanical or
electrical interlocking provided by the customer (ESB Networks, 2006).
2.10 Combined Heat & Power Deployment Programme
In December 2005, the minister for Finance announced an allocation of 65 million
euro over a period between 2006 and 2010 to launch several innovative grant schemes
relating to combined heat and power, biofuels, biomass commercial heaters and
domestic renewable heat grants.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 30
The deployment programme provided grant support to assist the deployment of small-
scale (< 1 MWe) fossil fired CHP and biomass CHP systems. It took the place of the
Combined Heat and power RD & D programme.
The programme includes feasibility studies, to assist investigation into the application
of CHP across all size ranges and technologies and investment grant support for
small-scale fossil fired CHP with a capacity ≤ 50 kWe < 1 MWe (SEAI, 2010).
The funding for qualifying projects was up to 40 %, maximum of 1.5 million euro per
project.
However due to the reduction of budget resources for 2011, the government CHP
Deployment Programme that was administered by SEAI is no longer open for
applications. The CHP Deployment Program was closed at the end of December
2010; under the scheme a total of 68 fossil fuelled small-scale CHP projects, totaling
15.7 MWe, 3 MWe of biomass CHP and 250 kWe of anaerobic digestion CHP (SEAI,
2012).
2.11 Sizing a CHP Plant
The over all cost for installing a CHP plant may be high, so it’s very important to
operate the plant efficiency. It is important that the CHP is running every day or
around 5000 hours per year. The CHP must be sized on the heat demand. It is also
important that other energy efficiency measures such as energy efficient light bulbs
etc., this will help to reduce the overall size of the CHP plant and lead to capital
investment savings on purchasing the plant. To calculate heat and power demands of
the building, there are two ways,
 Building management system
The BMS can monitor historical energy usage over long periods of time. It can
determine demand profiles throughout the day (early morning and evening times),
week days and weekend periods and summer and winter months.
 Analyzing gas and electricity bills
If there’s no BMS available, obtaining a monthly electricity and gas bills over a
period of one year and entering the data on to a spreadsheet. The monthly bills will
give an indication of the consumption of fuel and electricity throughout the year. By
getting in contact with the supply authority they will be able to supply the customer
with half-hourly meter readings, this information will can be used to compile energy
profiles. (Carbon Trust, 2012)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 31
2.12 Reviewing CHP Case Study’s Carried Out in the Hotel Sector
In order for the author to ascertain a good understanding of this research for small-
scale CHP systems. The author will identify areas of previous research by SEI and the
Irish Energy Center for benchmarking CHP systems in the hotel sector and will be
highlighted in the literature review.
2.12.1 Jury’s Hotel and Towers – Dublin
Jury’s Hotel an established hotel for nearly 40 years is located in Ballsbridge, Dublin.
The hotel comprises of 300 bedrooms, restaurants, pub, leisure center and 20-meter
swimming pool. A further 100 rooms are located in an adjoining block.
Prior to the installation of the CHP system, inefficient unreliable boilers rated at 4765
kg/h provided hot water and heating for the hotel. Inenco were appointed to carryout
an energy survey and review the hot water and heating system, with a view to
recommend energy saving measures and improve reliability. Inenco are an energy
consultancy firm specializing in energy procurement, sustainability, reporting and
analysis. Temp Technology was awarded the contract to install the CHP and carry out
monitoring and maintenance of the plant.
2.12.2 Project Description
 A complete redesign of the heating systems
 Installation of two new steam boilers and low pressure hot water boilers
 Installation of a CHP unit for the electrical (304 kWe) and thermal (445 kW)
requirements, with a fuel input of 999 kW.
 Main requirement of keeping the hotel open with no disruptions to hot water
or power
 Grant aid was made available from the Irish Energy Centre
 Project payback period was over 3 years
2.12.3 Plant Operation
The CHP plant is operational for 15 hours a day, 365 days a year, during peak hours 8
am to 11 pm. The CHP unit has an on board computer which allows Temp
Technology to monitor the plant.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 32
The advantage of this is that if a fault develops it can be monitored and dealt with
before it causes the plant to break down. This offers the client trouble free operation
of the plant. A documented monthly log of the CHP performance is then sent to the
facilities manger in Jury’s hotel. Maintenance is carried out once every 53 days (800
hrs.) this includes changing sparkplugs, fuel and air filters.
2.12.4 Project Results
Before the installation of the CHP plant, the hotels energy bill per year for oil, natural
gas and electricity was over 380,000 Euro. Installing the CHP plant has resulted in
savings of up to 63,000 Euro in energy costs per year.
Capital costs for the project was approximately 240,000 Euro. The pay back period on
the project was 3.8 years.
Not only does the CHP plaint offer financial benefits it also reduces greenhouse gases
emitted. According to Temp Technology “CHP is environmentally friendly (in
comparison to conventional power generation) and gives a reduction on C02 levels of
0.8kg per KWe” (Temp Technology, 2012).
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 33
3.0 Chapter 3: Methodology
3.1 Introduction
This chapter outlines the research methodology of this study. The author’s aims are to
succeed in examining the status of small-scale CHP systems within the hotel sector in
Ireland. The research was conducted in two phases:
 In the first phase, a qualitative approach was used to collect data,
 And in the second phase a quantitative approach was used.
It is important that the author’s methods will be quantitive and qualitive to achieve the
main research objectives, goals and questions set in this thesis.
Carol Grbich explains in her book “Qualitative data analysis an introduction” the
advantage of utilizing an innovative mix of data sources (qualitative and quantitative)
is that, apart from providing a broader view of the research question, it allows the
reader to view the phenomenon under study from different perspectives.
 The advantages of combining quantitive and qualitative data are that you can
maximize the impact of both.
 For mixed methods to be successful, issues of sampling, design, and data
analysis and data presentation need careful attention (Grbich, 2007).
3.2 ResearchObjectives
The objectives of this study were to:
 Research the relevant environmental policies and available grants for the
proposed CHP plant, these include, Kyoto Protocol, EU Emissions Trading
Scheme and Climate Change Strategy Ireland.
 Discuss the outcomes of the CHP plant in the Osprey Hotel and Spa and see
where improvements can be made.
 To research available grants for the installation of gas powered CHP in hotel
sector in Ireland.
 To investigate the feasibility of installation of CHP plant in the Osprey Hotel
and Spa.
 To examine the barriers to CHP.
 To carry out an environmental study on the proposed gas fuelled CHP plant.
 To perform a data analysis and financial appraisal on the proposed plant.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 34
3.3 Methods for Collecting Data
The materials used in this thesis consisted of several items such as books, reports and
journals. Researching through the Internet provide all resources required to carry out
the dissertation.
The author will first apply different types of qualitative research methods. After the
authors kick off meeting with the DIT project supervisor and obtaining an excellent
understanding of small-scale CHP plants using the most up to date information via the
DIT library and world wide web. During a site visit to the Osprey Hotel and Spa in
Naas all the relevant data was collected and then analysed.
The methodology for this thesis includes various methods for collecting data for
small-scale CHP plants. The data was obtained during on site visits and phone calls to
the facilities manager before writing the dissertation. All data and information was
collected between January 2013 and March 2013 during a site visit to the Naas
Osprey Hotel and Spa between February and March 2013.
All the information were examined and entered into Microsoft Excel and charts and
tables were create is illustrate the findings from the site visits. In an attempt to
ascertain the validity of the author’s findings, one set of data will be crosschecked
against another.
Quantitative analysis of the electricity and gas bills will provide an understanding of
the running costs of the CHP plant. After the authors discussion with the facilities
manager it was noted that the CHP was shut down during a three week period for re-
building works/upgrades in November 2011, varying costs as a result, will give an
insight in to the annual savings the Hotel benefits from the CHP plant.
The cost of maintenance per annum plus the initial capital costs of installing the plant
will be incorporated into the analysis to determine the benefits.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 35
3.4 Project Description
Figure 6 Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa
The Naas Osprey Hotel and Spa located on 8 acres in Naas, Co Kildare, built in 2003.
The complex includes the Osprey Hotel, Spa, Conference Centre, Crèche, Business
Campus, Health and Leisure, which incorporates a 25-meter swimming pool and
Time bar and nightclub. The hotel has 104 bedrooms with two penthouses suites with
hot tubs, restaurant, bar and lounge with ballroom. The Conference center has 16 self-
contained meeting rooms.
Figure 7 Ariel View of the Osprey Complex
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 36
The health and leisure center includes a 20-meter swimming pool, gym with over 100
pieces of equipment. The Osprey Spa comprises of 8 treatment rooms. The Time Bar
and Nightclub can host events for up to 2000 people and boast’s 9 bars.
The total area serviced by the CHP plant is 221,168 ft2 or 20,547.2 m2
With the increase in electricity prices in 2004/05 and after the ESB receiving further
approval for a 16 % increase in 2006. In order to reduce energy costs for the hotel two
approaches were examined by the managing director of the Osprey Hotel, Mr. Ole
Andersen
 Reduce energy consumption through energy efficient measures
 Reduce electricity bills through CHP generation.
F4energy undertook the Combined Heat and Power project. At the design stage a
report carried out incorporating the following,
 12-month historic heat and electricity consumption.
 The peak electrical and heat loads
 Detailed annual energy savings, pre and post CHP
 Site survey/ proposed location
The managing director Mr. Ole Andersen took the decision to proceed with the CHP
project in September 2005.
F4energy installed the CHP plant. The CHP installation project included a gas-fired
Mercedes Benz 324 KWe engine, with an electrical and thermal output of 324 KWe
and 485 KW respectively. The capital costs of installing the CHP plant were 300,000
Euro.
With F4energy liaising with the ESB and Bord Gais the project was completed in 19
weeks. No interruption to the hotels electricity or hot water during the 19 weeks of
installation and commissioning works. In addition to energy efficient measures taken
the CHP scheme was designed to reduce ESB daytime consumption.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 37
4.0 Chapter Four: Data Collection
4.1 Introduction
The data on the energy consumption of the hotel was gathered by reviewing the
electricity and gas bills. The installers of the CHP monitor the CHP plant and review
billing data. The total gas energy consumption is metered by Bord Gais and the
electricity is metered by the ESB.
4.2 CHP Operation
The CHP plant is integrated with the hotels existing electrical and heating system, the
plant is designed to operate in parallel with the mains electricity supply, allowing the
deficit between the site demand and the CHP plant to be imported from the grid. This
ensures the security of the electricity supply in the event of the CHP unit fails, and the
existing gas boiler is on standby when required. The hotel will avail of the ESB’s
maximum demand tariff by reducing its peak demand during the day. The CHP
provides 129,895 kWh of electricity per month that otherwise would be purchased
from the supply authority.
Table 5 CHP plant operation
Energy Requirement Energy Source
Day time heat CHP 100%
Day time electricity CHP 60% External Provider 40%
Night time heat CHP 100%
Night time electricity External Provider 100%
4.3 Sizing of the CHP Plant
As a rule of thumb once a building has a demand for heat and power for more than
5000 hours per year an investment in to the scheme will be viable.
It was noted after the author’s discussion with F4 Energy’s managing director that the
CHP was sized on the electrical load and not the thermal base load, which is present
throughout the year. A feasibility study compiled by F4 Energy which reviewed the
hotels 12 month electricity consumption which was estimated at peak times 900kW
and an average load of 500kW.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 38
4.4 CHP Description
CHP-unit for natural gas operation with synchronous generator FMB-400-
GSMK
Electrical Power 324/319kWe @PF=1.0/0.8
Thermal power 485kW from jacket water lube oil and exhaust
Gas consumption (LHV) 911kW (LHV = lower heat value)
Fuel Type Natural Gas
Frequency 50 Hz
Voltage 400 volts
Power to Heat Ratio 1: 1.5
Electrical Efficiency 35.7%
Thermal Efficiency 53.2%
Total Efficiency 88.8%
Losses 11.1%
4.5 CHP Control System
The control system and the switchgear for the CHP plant are mounted on the base
frame and are connected to the unit. The synchronous generator is connected in
parallel with the electrical grid.
The CHP plant is remotely monitored by F4energy the suppliers and installers of the
plant. Monitoring and service work is carried out under warranty covering all parts
and labour for the first two years.
Electrical and gas bills are reviewed by F4energy and the facilities manager to ensure
the hotel is on the best national grid tariffs.
The heat output from the CHP unit is 830 C, and is fed into a hot water return header.
During the summer months some of the thermal energy from the CHP unit is
dissipated to the atmosphere by use of a blast radiator.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 39
Figure 8 Simplified diagram of typical low voltage combined heat and power electrical system (Source:
CIBSE AM12)
Figure 9 Mains Incomer and switch fuse for CHP plant
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 40
The PLC system, which monitors and controls the CHP plant, has the following
functions:
Start Stop Control Program
 Start delay on 0-20 s
 Starter motor on
 After reaching cranking speed, ignition on, 2 seconds later, gas solenoid
valves open
 After reaching ignition speed, starter motor off, monitoring of unit on
 After reaching nominal speed, synchronising with the grid takes place
Demand for Stop
 Load control down
 Generator circuit breaker open
 Gas solenoid valves shut
 After 20 seconds ignition out
Figure 10 CHP Control Interface Display Units
At the design stage analysis the base load was equated to be approximately 330KWe
and the CHP was sized to suit. After the authors discussion with the facilities manager
it was noted that the hotels demand for electricity increases in the summer months due
to air conditioning in the hotel.
On the 14th of February the during the authors site visit the electrical work done on
the control interface display was recorded at 9, 339, 666 kWh.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 41
A return visit on the 14th of March to the hotel to record the reading and it was re-
recorded at 9, 469, 561 kWh. Therefore the electrical work done by the CHP plant for
that monthly period was 129, 895 kWh.
The electricity supplier provides the remaining electrical energy, which equates to
125,000 KWh per month but will increase in the summer months because its peak
season in the hotel industry.
Figure 11 Schmitt Enertec Monitoring Unit interface
All data such as power, temperatures and pressures are continuously monitored by the
control system interface on the plant, (in figure 6). The interface is fitted with a
display with semi graphics, 12 function keys and alphanumeric keys. All failures can
be shown on the display with the date and time of their appearance. The machine
interface can display all data these include,
 Jacket water temperature
 Jacket water level
 Hot water temperature
 Lube oil pressure and level
 Oxygen in exhaust (Lamdba Sensor)
 Electrical power
 Generator voltage
 Grid voltage
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 42
4.6 F4 Energy Remote Monitoring
The CHP plant is monitored by F4 Energy using a web based SCADA system
(Supervisory Control and Data System) that allows supervision and control of the
CHP plant. All monitoring and service work is carried out under a fixed-price
warranty covering all parts and all labour
All grid electricity and gas bills are reviewed to ensure that the hotel is receiving the
least expensive grid tariff.
4.7 Heat Meter
Figure 12 CF Echo 11 Ultrasonic Heats and Cooling Meter
The heat meter is used to accurately measure and monitor the hot water released from
the CHP plant by the use of a set of temperature probes. The meter collects the
information and displays the results; the temperature range is between 00 C and 1800 C
The heating and cooling meter fulfills the EC regulations according to DIN EN 1434.
(Itron, 2011)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 43
4.8 Gas Meter
Figure 13 Itron MZ turbine gas meter
The MZ meter measures the flow of natural gas up to 10,000m3 and has a pressure
range of up to 100 bar The MZ meter is intrinsic safe approved BVS 95.d.2118.
The flow of gas turns a turbine wheel; the speed of the turbine blade is proportional to
the flow of gas.
4.9 Acoustic and Vibration Attenuation
Internal combustion engines and gas turbines generate noise and vibration that need to
be attenuated where CHP is to be integrated into buildings. Packaged units typically
come in attenuated enclosures, but care is still required when installing and
integrating the units into the building. The sound pressure level of 75 dB (A) within 1
meter of the exhaust is achieved with the use of an exhaust silencer. Because the CHP
plant is located in the underground car park adjacent to the Main hotel entrance lobby
the CHP does not require a high degree of attenuation. With the car park constructed
out of concrete, this acts as a vibration damper for the CHP plant.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 44
Figure 14 CHP Plant located in the Osprey underground car park
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 45
5.0 Chapter Five: Data analysis and Discussion of Results
5.1 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011
In order to establish the operational costs for the hotel analysis of the quantitative data
made available on gas and electricity consumption of the hotel has been undertaken.
The tables and graphs provide the details of the costs of electricity and gas consumed,
and will establish if the CHP is proving to be beneficial to the hotel, financially.
The chart in figure 8 below provides a monthly breakdown of electricity and gas
charges over one year period starting on the 1st of January and ending on the 31st of
December.
During December the CHP was out of service due to mechanical problems so for the
month of December the backup gas boiler was used to supply hot water/heat it can be
seen from table five that the increase in the electricity charges for the month of
December electrical requirement by the hotel was met by the supply authority. With
the CHP in service providing the base load of the hotel is worked out 129, 895 kWh
per month.
Figure 15 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
Euro
Month
Electricity & Gas Charges for 2011
Electricity
Gas
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 46
For an example of a typical gas and electricity bill see the appendix for a sample.
Table 6 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011
Month Electricity (Euro) Gas (Euro)
January 14357.58 22150.41
February 14775.15 22176.49
March 14900.23 21270.76
April 15144.56 22190.89
May 15239.75 22178.43
June 15985.57 22101.54
July 16034.87 22059.71
August 15849.71 21987.58
September 15579.74 22168.34
October 15471.11 22241.56
November 14190.43 22309.61
December 24954.04 22188.46
Table 7 Hotel Expenditure for 2011
Total Electricity and Gas Total Cost €
Total Electricity from 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2011 €192,482.7
Total Gas from 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2011 €265,023.78
Total Energy Costs for 2011 €457,506.48
5.2 Simple Payback Calculations
The annual electricity costs without the CHP in service is estimated at 299,448 Euro
(figures taken from figure 22 in the appendices). The monthly electricity bills are
calculated at 14,000 Euro with a increase estimated at 16,000 Euro in the summer
months. The annual electricity costs with the CHP in service for a full calendar year
is estimated at 182,482.70 Euro (note in 2011 the CHP was shut down in December
due to mechanical problems, electricity cost for 2011 was 192,482.70 Euro). The total
annual electricity savings as a result of the CHP is estimated at 117,819.30 Euro. The
annual Maintenance costs amount to 10,000 Euro excluding parts and equipment.
After maintenance costs the annual savings are estimated at 107,628 Euros.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 47
The Simple Payback method is calculated as follows,
𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘(𝑦𝑟𝑠.) = (€)𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 ÷ (€)𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠
𝑆. 𝑃𝐵.= €300,000 ÷ €107,819.30 = 2.8 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
This figure is not accurate because of assumptions had to be made on the electricity
bills. With the CHP out of service for only one month, the only bill available was the
month of December 2011 (figure 22 in the appendices) when all electricity consumed
was purchased from Energia.
5.2.1 Net Present Value Payback Calculations
The Net Present Value (NVP) has an advantage over the simple payback method.
NVP compares the value of the euro today to the value of that same euro in the future,
taking into account inflation. If the NVP of the project is positive it should be
accepted and if it is negative it should be rejected.
Table 8 NPV method using discounted cash flow
DCF
10%
NET NPV
Capital Investment 1 300,000 -300,000
Year 1 .909 107,628 97,833.85
Year 2 .826 107,628 88,900.73
Year 3 .751 107,628 80,828.63
Year 4 .683 107,628 73,509.92
NVP +41,073.13
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 48
5.3 Electrical and Gas Energy Consumption for 2011
Table 9 Electrical and gas consumption in KWh for 2011
Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa
January 2011 to December 2011
Electrical Consumption Gas Consumption
Month KWh KWh
Jan 254,390 503,509
Feb 256,387 504,346
Mar 255874 504,874
Apr 256,098 505,532
May 270,954 505,296
Jun 283,649 504,538
Jul 280,132 505,687
Aug 275,089 503,976
Sep 260,354 504,874
Oct 257,248 505,389
Nov 255,592 505,042
Dec 216,031 (CHP OFF) 470,349 (CHP OFF)
Figure 16 Electricity and gas consumption
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
KWh
Electricity and Gas Consumption
Electricity
Gas
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 49
5.4 Analysis of the Electrical Energy Costs
Energia supplies the electricity, it has over 60,000 business customers and it is the
largest independent energy supply company in Ireland and is licensed by the
Commission for energy Regulation.
The annual electricity consumption generated from the CHP plant is 1,558,740 kWh
/year and from the electricity grid is 1,563,058 kWh /year. Based on categories for
business end users of electricity. This level of consumption falls under band-IC
Maximum Import Capacity (MIC) is the level of electrical capacity contracted
between the hotel and the electrical supplier, The PSO charge on the bill is based on
the contracted MIC level, which is 580KVA. A Service Capacity Charge based on the
MIC if it is exceeded the hotel must pay and excess Capacity Charge.
Distribution use of system (DUoS) is a charge that the ESB Networks charges the
electricity supplier (Energia) for the use of the electricity distribution system. This
charge is passed from Energia on to the customer’s bill. The amount of DUoS that is
charged depends on the type of connection, the voltage or if electricity is exported.
The DUoS group for the hotel is DG7, (Medium Voltage MD Customers).
Meter Configuration Code (MCC) is a code used to describe the type of meter that
measures the amount of electricity that passes through the connection point. Referring
to the electricity bill the code is MCC 10. This term stands for, “quarter hourly: 2
channel recorder_imports KWs and KVArs. MD KWs AND MD KVArs recorded
every 15 minutes 24 hours, 7 days, all year”. (ESB Networks, 2010)
“The Transmission Use of System (TUoS) charges are where, all transmission
connected generators and distribution-connected generators with an MEC ≥ 10MW
are liable for Generation TUoS charges. In addition all transmission and distribution
connected generators are liable for Demand TUoS charges” (ESB Networks, 2010).
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 50
It is noted in the electrical costs in table 6, that the summer months from May to
August represent the greatest electrical consumption from the grid throughout the year
however even with this reduced demand for electricity in the winter months the CHP
plant must remain in full operation mode to ensure that the maximum running hours
are maintained if the system is to be financially viable.
5.4.1 Analysis of the Gas Energy Costs
The delivered quantity of gas per month is consistent throughout the year. The CHP
plant is fully operational 15 hours a day 7 days a week throughout the year. Referring
to the Bord Gais energy bill for the month of November the delivered quantity of gas
consumed is 45,260 m3, by applying the conversion factor of 10.7 (taken from the
CIBSE guide F), the kWh equivalent can be calculated, this equates to 505,042 kWh
of energy.
The Imbalance Gas Charge is a rebate credited back to the customer. It is explained in
the Gaslink website that:
“A Shipper's imbalance is the difference between the Shipper's Entry Allocation and
their Exit Allocation. Each Gas Day the Transporter "cashes-out" each of the network
Shippers' Imbalances. Any quantity of gas left in the network is in effect bought by
the Transporter from the Shipper while excess quantities of gas taken from the
network by Shippers, is charged by the Transporter to Shippers” (Gaslink, 2008).
The imbalance pricing structure was approved by the CER in April 2007, with a
request to update the pricing semi annually.
The Gas price plan agreed by Bord Gais for the Osprey Hotel is designed to suit the
way the hotel operates on a daily basis. The tariff made available is Daily Metered
Non-Swing, this option analysis the gas consumed on a daily basis give the customer
the best value.
With the CHP operating 15 hours a day, 7 days a week the gas usage is not going to
deviate and therefore the customer will not have to pay a swing charge. A swing
charge allows a customer a +/- 15% variation in usage. Every month the gas usage is
reviewed and if that usage goes beyond the variation then additional charges will be
incurred. (Bord Gais Energy, 2010)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 51
5.4.2 CHP Fuel Input
The tariff for the customer costs 2.3646 per unit (kWh) of delivered quantity of gas.
In producing 324 kWe of electricity and 485 kW of thermal energy the CHP will
consume on average 505,042 kWh or 45,260 m3 of gas per month.
5.5 Building Energy Benchmarking
The performance of the hotel that is expressed in kg C02 /m2 per year can be
calculated using the yearly electricity consumption (kWh). The result is compared
with published benchmarks in the CIBSE Guide F Energy Efficiency in Buildings.
The performance ratings are expressed in “good practice” and “typical practice”.
The basis of the benchmark is the electricity in kWh by the treated floor area of the
hotel.
The annual electricity consumption generated from the CHP plant is 1,558,740 kWh
/year and from the electricity grid is 1,563,058 kWh /year. The treated area of the
hotel is 20,547 m2
1,558,740 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 + 1,563,058 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 = 3,121,798 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
3,121,798 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 ÷ 20,547 𝑚2 = 151.9 𝑘𝑊. ℎ. 𝑚2 / 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
Referring to table 20.1 in the CIBSE guide F under hotels (-luxury) The figures given
are 90 kW.h.m2 / year (good practice) and 150kW.h.m2 / year (typical practice).
Therefore the hotel will fit under typical practice at 151.9 kW.h.m2 / year.
The performance indicator must be treated with caution because it’s the value is only
a broad indicator of efficiency. (CIBSE, 2004)
5.6 Maintenance and Servicing
Maintenance and servicing methods are becoming more structured and documented.
CHP plants require maintenance it can be carried out by maintenance staff, or in the
Osprey hotel F4energy the contractors who installed the plant. Under a fixed price
warranty covering all parts and all labour.
F4energy will monitor the CHP with a direct link to the system from their offices in
order to highlight problems before they cause breakdowns.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 52
In the F4energy field service report on the following page, the description of the
service actions carried out on the 13th of September 2010 are as follows
 “Replacement of under-voltage relays in generator circuit”
Figure 17 Typical F4energy service report
The maintenance schedule carried out in the Osprey hotel is a pro-active approach to
maintenance that accurately documents and records all work carried out throughout
the lifespan of the plant. The CHP plant report file has a unique identification number
(figure 18), this number is quoted in all maintenance activities or modification carried
out on the piece of equipment.
Figure 18 Maintenance Schedule, front page
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 53
5.7 Environmental Benefits of the CHP Plant
In order for the author to calculate the carbon footprint of the Osprey Hotel, the
accuracy of the footprint relies on collating data for all the emission sources.
Consumption of gas data in KWh from Bord Gais energy bills must be collected, and
electricity in KWh consumed from the grid must be collected for 12 months of the
year.
Total electricity consumed for 2011 (2,905,767 KWh)
CHP generated electricity for 2011 (1,558,740 KWh)
From the above readings the amount of electricity purchased from the grid can be
calculated by subtracting the two and this results in 1,347,047 KWh.
The carbon footprint is measured in tonnes of CO2 (t CO2 e), and is calculated using
the data collected and multiplied by emission factors.
Total Gas consumed for 2011 (5,553,063 KWh)
Total grid electricity for 2011 (1,347,047 KWh)
The energy conversion factors, which are taken from Part L2A of the building
regulations conversion factors, published in 2006. It can be seen that emissions
associated with grid supplied electricity is more than twice that per unit of gas
delivered, the complete chart is in the appendices, figure 32.
Table 10 CO2 emission factors by fuel type (Electric Ireland)(CIBSE Guide F)
Fuel Units KgCO2 per kWh Delivered
Grid Electricity KWh 0.532
Natural Gas KWh 0.194
The energy conversion factors in table 9 relate to CO2 emissions by fuel type (kg
CO2/ kWh delivered). These factors do not account for indirect emissions such as
extraction of natural gas or refining oil. The conversion factor for grid electricity and
natural gas is obtained from the electric Ireland website and CIBSE guide F
respectively.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 54
5.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Grid Electricity
𝐺𝑟𝑖𝑑 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 1,347,047 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.532
= 716,629 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ
5.7.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Saved by using CHP Plant
The on-site electricity generated from the CHP that would otherwise be purchased
from the grid is 1,558,740 KWh for 2011, so the greenhouse gas emissions saved can
be calculated.
𝐺𝑟𝑖𝑑 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑑 1,558,740 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.532
= 829,250 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ
By displacing national grid electricity the Osprey CHP plant has reduced the sites
carbon emissions by 829,250 Kg CO2 per kWh delivered.
5.7.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Natural Gas
The Osprey hotel consumed 5,553,063 KWh of natural gas during 2011, which
equates to a delivered quantity of 497,645 m3.
𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝑎𝑠 5,553,063 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.194
= 1,077,294 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ
5.7.4 Osprey Hotel Carbon Footprint
Table 11 Osprey Hotel carbon footprint
Fuel kWh CO2 ratio KgCO2 /kWh
Grid Supplied Electricity 1,347,047 0.532 716,629
CHP (Natural Gas) 5,553,063 0.194 1,077,294
Total 1,793,923
By displacing the national grid electricity, the osprey CHP plant reduces the site’s
carbon emissions by 829 Tonnes of CO2 per annum.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 55
5.8 Osprey Hotel CHP Plant Efficiency
While sizing the plant to meet the hotels minimum heat demands, from the data
collected during the site visit, it is noted the CHP plant is not operating at 100 %. The
maximum electrical output of the plant is 324 KWe. From figure 10 the CHP control
interface the plant is running at 95 % of its capacity,
“EL. Power =311 kW” (Source: Figure 10)
311 𝑘𝑊𝑒 ÷ 324 𝑘𝑊𝑒 = 95 %
The CHP efficiency, operating the CHP at 100 % capacity is as follows,
𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 911 𝑘𝑊 × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠. = 4,987,725 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡
𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 324 𝑘𝑊𝑒 × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠.= 1,773,900 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 485 𝑘𝑊𝑡ℎ × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠. = 2,655375 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 =
1,773,900
4,987,725
= 0.356 = 35.6 %
𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 =
2,655,375
4,987,725
= 0.532 = 53.2 %
𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝐻𝑃 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 88.8%
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 56
6.0 Chapter Six: Conclusion and Summary
Having collected all the relevant data and information on the operation of the CHP
plant in the Osprey hotel, the author then analysed the cost of natural gas, which
supplies 60% of the daytime electrical load via the CHP plant. From this the author
established the avoided electricity costs from using the small-scale CHP plant in the
hotel, which would otherwise be purchased from the electricity supplier.
The economic viability of a CHP plant is currently dependent on competitive gas and
electricity prices (spark spread), and it must be operational for up to 5000 hours per
annum.
In 2005 the net cost savings in the feasibility study carried out by F4 Energy was
approx. 135,000 Euro. With gas prices increased by up to 30% the net savings per
annum have reduced to approx. 107,000 Euro, but with rising electricity costs also
rising CHP projects are still attractive investments and have relatively short pay back
periods.
The combined total cost for gas and electricity was evaluated over a 1-year period. A
CHP feasibility study carried out by F4 Energy in July 2005, a payback period of 2
years was estimated. This unit rate is noted over the 12 monthly billing periods from
July 2004 to July 2005. The Authors feasibility study was carried out using 2011 gas
prices and a pay back period of 2.8 years using the simple pay back method and net
present value was calculated.
The main benefits discussed by the author of operating a CHP plant is that the cost of
natural gas does not vary throughout the day unlike electricity which is more
expensive during peak times during the day depending on the tariff. The plant
lifecycle is estimated at 10-15 years which some might say is relatively short but a
plant that cost 300,000 to install can save an estimated 1,605,000 million euro in
energy costs its lifecycle.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 57
After discussions with F4 energy it was noted that CHP wasn’t sized on the site heat
demand, with the electrical peak electrical load calculated at 900kW and an average
load of 500kW, a detailed energy costs of pre CHP versus post CHP was calculated.
During the summer months some of the thermal energy from the CHP unit is
dissipated to the atmosphere by use of a blast radiator.
The author investigated whether on not the CHP plant could be operated at 75% to
reduce the thermal energy being wasted in the summer months but this results in the
loss of electrical efficiency of the CHP.
During the course of the investigation of the economic viability of a CHP plant in the
Osprey Hotel the author discovered several areas of the system improvements could
deliver even more savings per annum and a user-friendly system. By incorporating a
BMS can help collect information such as meter readings, flow and return
temperatures, a BMS can extract information and log it in a so it can be a source of
useful information and prepare for inspection and maintenance procedures.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 58
7.0 Bibliography
Bord Gais Energy. (2010). Business Energy - Large Business - Gas Price Plans.
Retrieved March 22, 2013, from Bord Gais Energy:
www.bordgasienergy.ie/business/high-volume/gas-price-plans/
Carbon Trust. (2004). Good Practice Guide, Combined heat and power for buildings.
Actionenergy . London, UK.
Carbon Trust. (2012, September). Introducing combined heat and power, Anew
generation of energy and carbon savings. Retrieved Feburary 4, 2013, from Carbon
Trust:
www.carbontrust.com/media/19529/ctv044_introducing_combined_heat_and_power.
pdf
CER. (2009). CER Strategic Plan 2010-2014. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from
Commission for Energy Regulation: www.cer.ie/en/about-us-strategic-
plan.aspx?article=d60a49e4-4119-95f7-99844e9f397a
CER. (2008). Revised Process for the Authorisation and Licensing of Generation
Stations-Clarification of Decision CER/07/128. CER.
CHPA. (2013). Advantages & Benefits of CHP. Retrieved Feburary 16, 2013, from
Combined Heat and Power Association: www.chpa.co.uk/advantages--benefits-of-
chp_183.html
CIBSE. (2004). CIBSE Guide F (Vol. 2). Norwich, Norfolk, Great Britian: CIBSE
Publications Department.
COGEN Europe. (2013). Retrieved February 13, 2013, from COGEN Europe:
www.cogeneurope.eu/mission-and-objectives_49.html
Dep. of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. (2009). Maximising
Ireland's Energy Efficiency, The National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020.
pdf, Dublin.
Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2007). Ireland
National Climate Change Strategy 2007-2012. Retrieved november 13, 2011, from
http://climate%change20%20stratege%20ireland%202007.pdf
Energylinx. (2000). Gas Conversion m3 to kWhs. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from
Energylinx: www.//energylinx.co.uk/gas_meter_conversion_meters.html
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 59
Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Emissions Trading. Retrieved Feburary 8,
2013, from Environmental Protection Agency:
www.epa.ie/whatwedo/climate/emissionstrading/
ESB Networks. (2006, March 2). Conditions Governing Connection to the
Distribution System. Retrieved March 10, 2013, from
www.esb.ie/esbnetworks/en/downloads/conditions_governing_connection_embedded
_generation_mv_38kv.pdf
ESB Networks. (2010). Connect a Generator that will Operate in Parallel with the
Electricity Network. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from ESB Networks:
www.esb.ie/esbnetworks/en/generator-connections/gen_connection_no_export.jsp
Eurostat. (2012). Energy, transport and environment indicators. Belgium:
Publications Office of the European Union.
Fin, D. (2010). Cogeneration A Users Guide (Vol. 1). London, UK: The Institution of
Engineering and Technology.
Gaslink. (2008). Imbalance Price. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from Gaslink:
www.gaslink.ie/index.jsp?p=185&n=221&a=0
General Electric. (2013). Gas Engines-Power Geneation. Retrieved March 2, 2013,
from General Electric Company: www.ge-
energy.com/products_and_services/products/gas_engines_power_genration/
Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis an introduction. London: Sage
Publications Ltd.
Hodkinson, D. O. (2008). Faber & Kell's Heating and Air-Conditioning of Buildings.
Oxford, Great Britain: Elsevier.
Horlock, J. (1997). Cogeneration Combined Heat and Power Thermodynamics and
Economics. Cambridge, Great Britian: Krieger Publishing Company.
IEA/OECD. (2007). Energy Policies of IEA Countries Ireland 2007 Review. Paris,
France: IEA Publications.
Irish Energy Centre. (2001). An Examination of the Future Potential of CHP in
Ireland. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from
www.seai.ie/uploadedfiles/InfoCentre/chpreport.pdf
Irish Statute Book. (1993). S.I. No. 44/1993 - Safety, Health and Welfare At Work
(General Application) Regulations, 1993. Retrieved March 10, 2013, from Irish
Statute Book: www.irishstatutebook.ie
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 60
Itron. (2011, March 29). CF Echo 11 uitrasonic compact heat and cooling meter Qp
0.6-15m3/h. Retrieved 2013, from www.temetra.com/wp-
content/uploads/2011/10/CF-ECHO-11.PDF
PB Power for The Royal Academy of Engineering. (n.d.). The Cost of Generating
Electricity. Retrieved november 26, 2011, from
http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/pubblications/list/reports/Cost_Generation_Commenta
rty.pdf
SEAI. (2000). A Guide to CHP in Ireland. Retrieved February 24, 2013, from
www.seai.ie/Publications/Renewables_Publications_/CHP/Guide_to_CHP_in_Ire_lo
w_.pdf
SEAI. (2006, February). CHP in Ireland options for a national policy to 2010.
Retrieved Febryary 16, 2013, from
www.seai.ie/About_Energy/Energy_Policy/National_Policy_Drivers/CHP_Policy_Gr
oup_Report_18082006.pdf
SEAI. (2010, October 3). Combined Heat and Power Deployment Programme.
Retrieved February 12, 2012, from
www.seai.ie/Grants/CHP/CHP_Applications_Guide.pdf
SEAI. (2012). Combined Heat and Power in Ireland. Dublin: EPSSU.
SEAI. (2012). Energy in Ireland 1990-2011, 2012 Report. Retrieved February 16,
2013, from SEAI:
www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_Publications/Energy_in_Ireland_1990_-
_2011.pdf
U.S. EPA. (2008, December). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat
and Power Partnership. Retrieved Feburary 16, 2013, from U.S. EPA:
www.epa.gov/chp/documents/catalog_chptect_full.pdf
United Nations Framework Convention. (2011). United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from
http://unfccc.int/2860
United Nations. (2012). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Retrieved Feburary 8, 2013, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate
Change: http://www.unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 61
8.0 Appendices
Figure 19 Bord Gais Energy, Gas Bill for November 2011
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 62
Figure 20 Energia Electricity Bill for November 2011
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 63
Figure 21 Bord Gais Energy Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 64
Figure 22 Energia Electricity Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 65
Figure 23 CHP Plant Specifications
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 66
Figure 24 Schematic Diagram of the CHP plant Designed by Schmitt Enertec
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 67
Figure 25 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 68
Figure 26 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form Part 1
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 69
Figure 27 ESB Networks Application Fees for Embedded Generators, Approved by the CER
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 70
Figure 28 Fossil and electric building benchmarks (CIBSE guide F)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 71
Figure 29 SEAI comparison of energy costs (SEAI)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 72
Figure 30 Business electricity prices in band IC in 2011
Figure 31 CHP Name Plate
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 73
Figure 32 CO2 emissions conversion factors by fuel type (Part L2A Building Regulations)
Figure 33 CHP plant
Renew
able
Waste
Heat
Bioma
ss
Natura
l Gas
LPG Oil Coal
Smoke
less
Fuel
Grid
Suppli
ed
Electri
city
Grid
Displa
ced
Electri
city
CO2/kWh 0 0.018 0.025 0.194 0.234 0.265 0.291 0.392 0.422 0.568
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
CO2emissions(Kg/kWh)
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 74
Figure 34 CHP user interface
Figure 35 CHP located beside the hotels main distribution board
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 75
Figure 36 CHP water inlet
Figure 37 typical service reports
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 76
Figure 38 typical service reports
Figure 39 Service report check sheet
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 77
Figure 40 typical service reports
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 78
Figure 41 typical service reports
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 79
9.0 Thesis Schedule
9.1 Student-Supervisor Log Report
Student-Supervisor Log Report
Dates of Meetings
5/02/2013, 19/02/2013 12/03/2013, 12/03/2013, 9/04/2013,
16/04/2013,
Attendees Paul Derwin and Project Supervisor Mr. Tony Kealy
Items Discussed
6/02/2013 Kick off Meeting with Tony.
19/02/2013 Literature Review discussion.
12/03/2013 Meeting to discuss gas & electricity bills.
12/03/2013 Meeting to discuss CO2 emissions and efficiency
of the hotel.
09/04/2013 Progress report meeting.
16/04/2013 Progress report meeting.
30/04/2013 Progress report meeting
Tasks to be
Completed
 19/02/2013 Literature review to be completed
 9/04/2013 Data collection to be completed
 30/04/2013 Data analysis and Discussion of
Results and conclusion to be completed
Site Visit 14/02/2013 & 14/03/2013
Site Visit Tasks
 14/02/2013 Author meets Kieran Maher
(facilities manager), collects all relevant data
on the CHP system and takes photos
 14/03/2013 Author records the work done in
kWh on the control interface of the CHP unit
for one month.
Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St.
D07114349 80
9.2 Student Log Report for Thesis
Student Log Report for Thesis
November 2012
 Contact facilities manager in the Lyrath Estate Hotel in
Kilkenny to request info on CHP, unable to help the
author.
 Contact facilities manager in the Burlington Hotel to
request information on their CHP plant (unable to help
the author, recommends the Osprey Hotel.
January 2013
 Contact Naas Osprey Hotel to request information on
the CHP plant. Date organised for meeting.
 Collection of literature information
February 2013
 Meeting with the facilities manager at the Osprey to
collect relevant data
March 2013
 Deadline for the completion of the methodology and
literature review sections
 Deadline for data collection
April 2013
 30/04/2013 Data analysis and Discussion of Results
and conclusion to be completed
 Proof reading and editing
May 2013
 Format and print thesis document for binding
 Prepare presentation power point for interview
 May 7 2013, submission date for thesis document
Signature

More Related Content

Similar to Barcelona 2

Project_ReportTBelle(1)
Project_ReportTBelle(1)Project_ReportTBelle(1)
Project_ReportTBelle(1)Tyler Belle
 
EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...
 EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI... EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...
EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...OLANREWAJU AKINOLA
 
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL iginapaul
 
Barry Madden thesis D08113175
Barry Madden thesis D08113175Barry Madden thesis D08113175
Barry Madden thesis D08113175Madden Barry
 
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,Brian Tarus
 
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applications
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applicationsDistributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applications
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applicationsAndrew Gelston
 
Project Management
Project ManagementProject Management
Project ManagementPaul Derwin
 
DISSERTATION final (final)
DISSERTATION final (final)DISSERTATION final (final)
DISSERTATION final (final)Yih Torng Hea
 
Thesis-Generic Sorting System
Thesis-Generic Sorting SystemThesis-Generic Sorting System
Thesis-Generic Sorting SystemBlake Kiely
 
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...Phil Carr
 
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...Shane Power
 
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...Matthew Kearney
 

Similar to Barcelona 2 (20)

Project_ReportTBelle(1)
Project_ReportTBelle(1)Project_ReportTBelle(1)
Project_ReportTBelle(1)
 
SamarasingheDAS
SamarasingheDASSamarasingheDAS
SamarasingheDAS
 
EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...
 EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI... EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...
EXPLORING MODULAR CONSTRUCTION WITH THE USE OF SHIPPING CONTAINERS FOR HOUSI...
 
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL
Student's Work Experience Program (SWEP) by IGINA PAUL
 
Barry Madden thesis D08113175
Barry Madden thesis D08113175Barry Madden thesis D08113175
Barry Madden thesis D08113175
 
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,
Final_project_in_Actuarial_Science,
 
S E I Passive House
S E I Passive HouseS E I Passive House
S E I Passive House
 
Thesis
ThesisThesis
Thesis
 
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applications
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applicationsDistributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applications
Distributed vs. centralized energy storage for power system applications
 
Dissertation a
Dissertation aDissertation a
Dissertation a
 
Project Management
Project ManagementProject Management
Project Management
 
DISSERTATION final (final)
DISSERTATION final (final)DISSERTATION final (final)
DISSERTATION final (final)
 
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACTABSTRACT
ABSTRACT
 
fac_alahari001_planczhaov1
fac_alahari001_planczhaov1fac_alahari001_planczhaov1
fac_alahari001_planczhaov1
 
Thesis-Generic Sorting System
Thesis-Generic Sorting SystemThesis-Generic Sorting System
Thesis-Generic Sorting System
 
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...
SSTRM - StrategicReviewGroup.ca - Workshop 2: Power/Energy and Sustainability...
 
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIFFERENT PV TECHNOLOGIES FOR LARGE SCALE APPLICATIONS...
 
Leininger_umd_0117N_16271
Leininger_umd_0117N_16271Leininger_umd_0117N_16271
Leininger_umd_0117N_16271
 
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...
Students in the director's seat: Teaching and learning across the school curr...
 
10138455 FYP Final Draft
10138455 FYP Final Draft10138455 FYP Final Draft
10138455 FYP Final Draft
 

More from Paul Derwin

Natural Ventilation power point
Natural Ventilation power pointNatural Ventilation power point
Natural Ventilation power pointPaul Derwin
 
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2DONE Literature Review. assignment 2
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2Paul Derwin
 
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf Club
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf ClubDONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf Club
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf ClubPaul Derwin
 
PD-02 1st FL General Services
PD-02 1st FL General ServicesPD-02 1st FL General Services
PD-02 1st FL General ServicesPaul Derwin
 
ME-01 GF Mechanical
ME-01 GF MechanicalME-01 GF Mechanical
ME-01 GF MechanicalPaul Derwin
 
L-01 GF Lighting
L-01 GF LightingL-01 GF Lighting
L-01 GF LightingPaul Derwin
 
F-01 GF Fire Alarm
F-01 GF Fire AlarmF-01 GF Fire Alarm
F-01 GF Fire AlarmPaul Derwin
 
C-01 Containment GR
C-01 Containment GRC-01 Containment GR
C-01 Containment GRPaul Derwin
 
Anemometers Assignment
Anemometers AssignmentAnemometers Assignment
Anemometers AssignmentPaul Derwin
 
Group Assignment[1]
Group Assignment[1]Group Assignment[1]
Group Assignment[1]Paul Derwin
 
CJK Eng. Reference Letter
CJK Eng. Reference LetterCJK Eng. Reference Letter
CJK Eng. Reference LetterPaul Derwin
 

More from Paul Derwin (14)

Natural Ventilation power point
Natural Ventilation power pointNatural Ventilation power point
Natural Ventilation power point
 
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2DONE Literature Review. assignment 2
DONE Literature Review. assignment 2
 
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf Club
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf ClubDONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf Club
DONE Energy Audit Castleknock Golf Club
 
Project-Pool
Project-PoolProject-Pool
Project-Pool
 
PD-02 1st FL General Services
PD-02 1st FL General ServicesPD-02 1st FL General Services
PD-02 1st FL General Services
 
ME-01 GF Mechanical
ME-01 GF MechanicalME-01 GF Mechanical
ME-01 GF Mechanical
 
M-02 Schematic
M-02 SchematicM-02 Schematic
M-02 Schematic
 
L-01 GF Lighting
L-01 GF LightingL-01 GF Lighting
L-01 GF Lighting
 
K-01 GF GS
K-01 GF GSK-01 GF GS
K-01 GF GS
 
F-01 GF Fire Alarm
F-01 GF Fire AlarmF-01 GF Fire Alarm
F-01 GF Fire Alarm
 
C-01 Containment GR
C-01 Containment GRC-01 Containment GR
C-01 Containment GR
 
Anemometers Assignment
Anemometers AssignmentAnemometers Assignment
Anemometers Assignment
 
Group Assignment[1]
Group Assignment[1]Group Assignment[1]
Group Assignment[1]
 
CJK Eng. Reference Letter
CJK Eng. Reference LetterCJK Eng. Reference Letter
CJK Eng. Reference Letter
 

Barcelona 2

  • 1. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. Dublin Institute of Technology The School of Electrical Engineer Systems In Partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Bachelor of Science in Electrical Services and Energy Management Title: To evaluate the Potential of CHP in the Hotel sector in Ireland By: Mr. Paul Derwin Project Supervisor: Tony Kealy Date: 7 / 05 / 2013
  • 2. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 ii Declaration I hereby certify that the material, which is submitted in this assignment/project, is entirely my own work and has not been submitted for any academic assessment other than as part fulfillment of the assessment procedures for the program Bachelor of Science in Electrical Services and Energy Management (BSc (Hons)) (DT 018). Signature of student: Paul Derwin Date: 7 / 05 / 2013
  • 3. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 iii Foreword and Acknowledgement The objective of this dissertation is to provide an insight in to small-scale combined heat and power development in the hotel sector in Ireland by analysing recent CHP project in the hotel sector. I would like to sincerely thank Mr. Tony Kealy in his role as supervisor throughout the thesis. Without his guidance and knowledge, I would not have completed it, the staff at the Osprey Hotel and facilities manager, Mr. Kieran Maher for providing me with his time, information and assistance throughout the thesis and Mr. Martin Barrett in his role as Lecturer, for his assistance, guidance during the project proposal. I would also like to thank my fellow classmates as well for any guidance that I would have received from them. Finally, I would like to thank my family and friends for their support, patience and understanding throughout my college tenure.
  • 4. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 iv Table of Contents Declaration..................................................................................................................... ii Foreword and Acknowledgement ..................................................................................iii Table of Contents.......................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................vii List of Figures ..............................................................................................................viii Glossary of Terms..........................................................................................................x Abstract ......................................................................................................................... xi Chapter 1: Introduction................................................................................................12 2.0 Chapter 2: Literature Review.................................................................................13 2.1 What is Combined Heat and Power ...................................................................13 2.2 CHP in Ireland ...................................................................................................13 2.2.1 CHP in Europe ............................................................................................16 2.3 Benefits of Implementing CHP..........................................................................17 2.4 CHP Technology................................................................................................18 2.4.1 Prime Mover ...............................................................................................18 2.4.2 Electrical Generator ....................................................................................19 2.4.3 Heat Recovery Equipment ..........................................................................19 2.5 CHP Range.........................................................................................................20 2.6 Barriers to developing CHP ...............................................................................20 2.6.1 Awareness and Information Barriers ..........................................................21 2.7 Climate Change..................................................................................................22 2.7.1 Environmental Aspects of CHP ..................................................................24 2.8 National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020 .........................................25 2.8.1 Energy Policies ...........................................................................................25 2.9 Connection to the Electricity Grid Network ......................................................26 2.9.1 Connection Application Process .................................................................27 2.9.2 Requirements for Protection of Embedded CHP Installations ...................28 2.9.3 Synchronising .............................................................................................29 2.10 Combined Heat & Power Deployment Programme.........................................29 2.11 Sizing a CHP Plant...........................................................................................30 2.12 Reviewing CHP Case Study’s Carried Out in the Hotel Sector ......................31
  • 5. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 v 2.12.1 Jury’s Hotel and Towers – Dublin ............................................................31 2.12.2 Project Description....................................................................................31 2.12.3 Plant Operation .........................................................................................31 2.12.4 Project Results ..........................................................................................32 3.0 Chapter 3: Methodology ........................................................................................33 3.1 Introduction........................................................................................................33 3.2 Research Objectives...........................................................................................33 3.3 Methods for Collecting Data..............................................................................34 3.4 Project Description.............................................................................................35 4.0 Chapter Four: Data Collection ...............................................................................37 4.1 Introduction........................................................................................................37 4.2 CHP Operation...................................................................................................37 4.3 Sizing of the CHP Plant .....................................................................................37 4.4 CHP Description................................................................................................38 4.5 CHP Control System..........................................................................................38 4.6 F4 Energy Remote Monitoring ..........................................................................42 4.7 Heat Meter..........................................................................................................42 4.8 Gas Meter...........................................................................................................43 4.9 Acoustic and Vibration Attenuation ..................................................................43 5.0 Chapter Five: Data analysis and Discussion of Results .........................................45 5.1 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 ................................................................45 5.2 Simple Payback Calculations.............................................................................46 5.2.1 Net Present Value Payback Calculations ....................................................47 5.3 Electrical and Gas Energy Consumption for 2011 ............................................48 5.4 Analysis of the Electrical Energy Costs.............................................................49 5.4.1 Analysis of the Gas Energy Costs...............................................................50 5.4.2 CHP Fuel Input ...........................................................................................51 5.5 Building Energy Benchmarking ........................................................................51 5.6 Maintenance and Servicing................................................................................51 5.7 Environmental Benefits of the CHP Plant .........................................................53 5.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Grid Electricity.........................54 5.7.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Saved by using CHP Plant .............................54 5.7.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Natural Gas ..............................54
  • 6. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 vi 5.7.4 Osprey Hotel Carbon Footprint ..................................................................54 5.8 Osprey Hotel CHP Plant Efficiency ..................................................................55 6.0 Chapter Six: Conclusion and Summary.................................................................56 7.0 Bibliography...........................................................................................................58 8.0 Appendices.............................................................................................................61 9.0 Thesis Schedule......................................................................................................79 9.1 Student-Supervisor Log Report .........................................................................79 9.2 Student Log Report for Thesis...........................................................................80
  • 7. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 vii List of Tables Table 1 CHP Number of Units and Operational Capacity by Fuel 2011 (SEAI, 2012) ..............................................................................................................................14 Table 2 R.Evans (1993) Environmental & Economic Implications of Small-Scale CHP, Energy Policy.............................................................................................25 Table 3 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). ...........................................29 Table 4 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). ...........................................29 Table 5 CHP plant operation........................................................................................37 Table 6 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 .............................................................46 Table 7 Hotel Expenditure for 2011 ............................................................................46 Table 8 NPV method using discounted cash flow .......................................................47 Table 9 Electrical and gas consumption in KWh for 2011..........................................48 Table 10 CO2 emission factors by fuel type (Electric Ireland)(CIBSE Guide F) ........53 Table 11 Osprey Hotel carbon footprint ......................................................................54
  • 8. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 viii List of Figures Figure 1 CHP fuel and Thermal/Electrical output in Ireland 1994-2011 (SEAI, 2012) ..............................................................................................................................15 Figure 2 CHP electricity as % of total electricity generated in Ireland (SEAI, 2012).15 Figure 3 Combined heat and power generation in Europe, 2010 (Eurostat, 2012) .....16 Figure 4 Sankey Diagram (SEAI, 2006)......................................................................17 Figure 5 Energy Related CO2 Emissions by Sector (SEAI, 2012) ..............................24 Figure 6 Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa..............................................................................35 Figure 7 Ariel View of the Osprey Complex...............................................................35 Figure 8 Simplified diagram of typical low voltage combined heat and power electrical system (Source: CIBSE AM12) ...........................................................39 Figure 9 Mains Incomer and switch fuse for CHP plant .............................................39 Figure 10 CHP Control Interface Display Units..........................................................40 Figure 11 Schmitt Enertec Monitoring Unit interface .................................................41 Figure 12 CF Echo 11 Ultrasonic Heats and Cooling Meter .......................................42 Figure 13 Itron MZ turbine gas meter..........................................................................43 Figure 14 CHP Plant located in the Osprey underground car park..............................44 Figure 15 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011..........................................................45 Figure 16 Electricity and gas consumption..................................................................48 Figure 17 Typical F4energy service report..................................................................52 Figure 18 Maintenance Schedule, front page...............................................................52 Figure 19 Bord Gais Energy, Gas Bill for November 2011 ........................................61 Figure 20 Energia Electricity Bill for November 2011 ...............................................62 Figure 21 Bord Gais Energy Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service ..............................................................................................................................63 Figure 22 Energia Electricity Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service ..............................................................................................................................64 Figure 23 CHP Plant Specifications ............................................................................65 Figure 24 Schematic Diagram of the CHP plant Designed by Schmitt Enertec..........66 Figure 25 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form .......................................................67 Figure 26 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form Part 1.............................................68
  • 9. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 ix Figure 27 ESB Networks Application Fees for Embedded Generators, Approved by the CER................................................................................................................69 Figure 28 Fossil and electric building benchmarks (CIBSE guide F) .........................70 Figure 29 SEAI comparison of energy costs (SEAI)...................................................71 Figure 30 Business electricity prices in band IC in 2011 ............................................72 Figure 31 CHP Name Plate..........................................................................................72 Figure 32 CO2 emissions conversion factors by fuel type (Part L2A Building Regulations) .........................................................................................................73 Figure 33 CHP plant ....................................................................................................73 Figure 34 CHP user interface.......................................................................................74 Figure 35 CHP located beside the hotels main distribution board...............................74 Figure 36 CHP water inlet ...........................................................................................75 Figure 37 typical service reports..................................................................................75 Figure 38 typical service reports..................................................................................76 Figure 39 Service report check sheet ...........................................................................76 Figure 40 typical service reports..................................................................................77 Figure 41 typical service reports..................................................................................78
  • 10. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 x Glossary of Terms KWh – Kilowatt-hour M3 – Cubic Meter CHP – Combined Heat and Power Cogeneration – Using a heat engine to simultaneously produce heat electricity MIC – Maximum Import Capacity PSO – Public Service Obligation CER – Commission for Energy Regulation CENELEC – European Committee for Electro technical Standardisation SEAI – Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland KW – Kilowatt ESB – Electricity Supply Board GHG – Greenhouse gases NVP – Net Present Value SPB – Simple Payback EPA – Environmental Protection Agency KWe – CHP electricity capacity KWth – CHP thermal capacity V – Volts DUoS – Distribution System Operation TUoS – Transmission System Operator EPA – Environmental Protection Agency ICHPA – Irish Combined Heat & Power Association SEI – Sustainable Energy Ireland SO2 – Sulphur Dioxide CO2 – Carbon Dioxide NO2 – Nitrogen Dioxide CO – Carbon Monoxide CH4 – Methane
  • 11. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 xi Abstract This paper examines how Combined Heat and Power benefits the hotel sector in Ireland. The cast study will be carried out on the Naas Osprey Hotel and Spa in County Kildare. The energy savings as a result of the CHP plant were evaluated. Billing information for period of 12 months during 2011 was gathered and analysed. As a result of installing the CHP plant in the Osprey hotel, the hotels daytime ESB consumption is significantly reduced and with the displaced grid electricity the Osprey CHP plant reduces the site’s carbon emissions per annum. The author will use two fundamental evaluative approaches in this research:  Qualitative, which will include surveys, historical research and  Quantitive, which will include Case Studies, spreadsheets and charts illustrating recorded data. A feasibility study will be drawn up by the author, which will incorporate a12-month historic gas and electricity energy consumption by the Osprey hotel.
  • 12. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 12 Chapter 1: Introduction This research aims to investigate the energy performance of Gas powered Combined Heat and Power plant. It is hoped that the results of this research will benefit both building facilities manager and energy managers alike, by delivering a greater understanding of the operation and design of a CHP system, and the potential energy saving costs that can be implemented. Due to current economic and environmental reasons, companies and organisations worldwide are constantly under pressure to reduce their energy consumption. As energy cost is the primary expense for these companies and organisations, a reduction in energy consumption will lead to a reduction in their operating cost base, which will ultimately lead to a more profitably business model. A reduction in energy consumption can be achieved by many means, but in particular, the implementation of energy efficiency and energy conservation programs within the company or organisation, will lead to a promotion of efficient and effective energy use. The Directive 2004 / 8 / EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 11 February 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending Directive 92 / 42 / EEC states; “The potential for use of cogeneration as a measure to save energy is underused in the Community at present. Promotion of high-efficiency cogeneration based on a useful heat demand is a Community priority given the potential benefits of cogeneration with regard to saving primary energy, avoiding network losses and reducing emissions, in particular of greenhouse gases. In addition, efficient use of energy by cogeneration can also contribute positively to the security of energy supply and to the competitive situation of the European Union and its Member States. It is therefore necessary to take measures to ensure that the potential is better exploited within the framework of the internal energy market”.
  • 13. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 13 2.0 Chapter 2: Literature Review The purpose of this literature review is to provide relevant information on the theory and concepts behind the use of Combined Heat and Power systems and the analysis of standards and codes of practice carried out in the area of small-scale Combined Heat and Power systems in the hotel sector in Ireland. (SEAI, 2012) (Horlock, 1997) 2.1 What is Combined Heat and Power “CHP, also referred to as ‘cogeneration’ or ‘total energy’, is the simultaneous generation of usable heat and power within a single process. The Power generated is usually electricity, but can also be mechanical power for driving equipment such as pumps, compressors and fans” (Carbon Trust, 2012). CHP is a single process where by simultaneous generation of electricity and heat is achieved. The CHP unit typically replaces the oil or gas boiler and is extensively used in commercial and industrial premises. The CHP plant is versatile piece of equipment it can run on natural gas, biogas or diesel. The type and range of CHP available are,  Micro CHP (≤ 5kWe)  Small-scale CHP (≤ 2 MWe) - Spark Ignition engines - Micro-turbines (30 - 100 kWe) - Small scale gas turbines (500 kWe)  Large-scale (> 2 MWe) -Large reciprocating engines -Large gas turbines (Carbon Trust, 2004). 2.2 CHP in Ireland According to the SEAI “the installed capacity of CHP in Ireland at the end of 2011 was 326 MWe (262 CHP units) up from 307 MWe (227 units) in 2010, an increase of 6.2 %. However the 2011 installed capacity figures, of the 262 CHP units 189 of them were reported as being in operation. The operational installed capacity increased by 22 MWe, to 304 MWe, in 2011 compared with 2010.
  • 14. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 14 Table 1 CHP Number of Units and Operational Capacity by Fuel 2011 (SEAI, 2012) According to the SEAI report labeled “Combined Heat and Power in Ireland, 2012 update”, in 2010 hotels (40 %) and leisure centers (20 %) account for the majority of CHP units in the services sector closely followed by hospitals (17 %). These sites benefit from having CHP systems because of the constant demand for heat and power. Other sub-sectors include, education and office (both 6 %), airport (2 %), retail (3 %) and other services (5 %). The single CHP unit (160 MWe) in Aughinish Alumina plant in Limerick accounts for 63.4 % of the total operational capacity in the industrial sector, and the food processing plants accounting for 23.3 % (12 units). In December 2005 an Irish government supported grant scheme was announced to run between 2006 and 2010, to assist businesses in Ireland in the deployment of CHP across the country. The program objectives include;  Increase deployment of small-scale, fossil fuel and biomass CHP systems in industrial, commercial and public sectors.  Reduce carbon emissions and fossil fuel consumption.  Increase electricity system security via more diversity of local embedded generating plants.  Increase awareness in CHP systems. The funding available depends on the type of project and technologies used, up to 30 % investment support for small-scale (≥ 50 kWe and < 1 MWe) fossil fired CHP projects. (SEAI, 2010) According to the 2012 report on Combined Heat and Power in Ireland the SEAI CHP deployment programme was stopped on December 2010. It was noted that 68 (fossil- fueled) small-scale CHP projects with a total 157.7 MWe, biomass CHP (3 MWe capacity), and anaerobic digestion CHP (250 kMe capacity) benefited from this program (SEAI, 2012).
  • 15. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 15 Figure 1 CHP fuel and Thermal/Electrical output in Ireland 1994-2011 (SEAI, 2012) The above chart illustrates the CHP contribution to Irelands energy requirement between 1994 and 2011. It can be seen that the large increase in 2006 is accounted for the Aughinish Alumina plant (160 MWe) that became operational at that time. Fuel inputs have increased by 156 %, thermal and electrical outputs increased by 182 % and 654 % respectively over the period 1994 to 2011. (SEAI, 2012) Figure 2 CHP electricity as % of total electricity generated in Ireland (SEAI, 2012)
  • 16. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 16 2.2.1 CHP in Europe Figure 3 Combined heat and power generation in Europe, 2010 (Eurostat, 2012) It is noted in the Eurostat report on “Energy, transport and environment indicators that in 2010, combined heat and power generation in the European Union generated 11.7 % of gross electricity. “The share of electricity produced by cogeneration processes varied from 1 % in Cyprus to 49.2 % in Denmark. From 2005 to 2010, the highest increase in CHP share was recorded in Lithuania (34.6 % in 2010 from 15.5 % in 2005) and Latvia (45.0 % in 2010 from 30.7 % in 2005). On the contrary, the highest decrease was reported by Romania (10.8 % in 2010 from 26.2 % in 2005)”. (Eurostat, 2012). In Ireland 6.8% of electricity was generated by CHP plants in 2010. In 2010, 14 of the CHP plants were exporting 1,347 GWh of electricity to the grid. (SEAI, 2012)
  • 17. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 17 2.3 Benefits of Implementing CHP Figure 4 Sankey Diagram (SEAI, 2006) Combined Heat and Power offers plenty of benefits over traditional boilers and electric only systems. The above diagram illustrates the reduced energy consumption of a CHP unit (80 % efficient) compared with separate production of heat and electricity, which has losses of up to 41 %. According to the Combined Heat and Power Association (CHPA), CHP provides the following benefits: (SEAI, 2012)  Minimum 10 % energy savings but its is generally higher  Up to 40 % cost savings on electricity generated from the CHP unit over electricity from the grid  Minimum of 10 % CO2 savings in comparison to other methods of thermal and electrical generation  Up to 80 % efficient  Guarantee of electrical and thermal energy for the consumer  Reliable technology with established supplier base.  A reduction in the cost of energy, improving the competitiveness of industry and business, helping to mitigate fuel poverty.
  • 18. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 18  CHP is versatile and can be coupled with existing and planned technologies for many different applications in the industrial, commercial and residential sectors (CHPA, 2013) 2.4 CHP Technology The basic components of a CHP unit are (1) The Prime Mover, (2) An Electrical Generator and (3) The Heat Recovery Equipment. There are a number of different types of prime mover, which vary from an internal combustion engine, steam turbine, gas turbine, combined cycle gas turbines or fuel cells. The electrical generator that converts the mechanical energy from the prime mover to electrical energy is either a synchronous generator, which is a stand-alone type, or an asynchronous generator that requires a connection to the electrical grid and will shut down in the event of a power outage. According to the Irish CHP Association, for the natural gas-fired CHP system to be technically and economically feasible, it generally requires a simultaneous demand for heat and electricity on the premises, for a minimum of 14 hours per day or 5000 hours per year. (SEAI, 2000) 2.4.1 Prime Mover In the hotel sector small scale CHP units are preferred, where there is always a steady demand for heat and power throughout the year. Small-scale CHP units consist of an internal combustion engine or gas turbines. Gas turbines are available from 100 KW to 100 MW. The heat to power ratio is from 1 to 3. In the gas combustion process the air to fuel ratio is 100 to 1, the exhaust gas contains high levels of nitrogen and oxygen. This may be classed as hot air, which is suitable for processing and heating purposes. Gas turbines require frequent maintenance schedules required between 20,000 - 70,000 hours of operation. Other types of prime mover are the spark ignited gas engines operated on mains gas, or the larger sized CHP unit use diesel engines. These reciprocating engines are available in many sizes, which range from as low as 6 KW to 200 MW. The reciprocating engines are liquid cooled and the same liquid is used as a secondary source of thermal energy with the hot exhaust gases. The maintenance on the reciprocating engines is not a complicated as the gas turbine but may be more frequent with higher costs involved.
  • 19. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 19 2.4.2 Electrical Generator The generator converts the mechanical shaft power of the prime mover into electrical energy. The generators used in CHP systems are either synchronous or asynchronous. Synchronous generators can operate completely independently of the grid and may be used for standby electrical generation. They require a battery to start, are more complex and therefore are expensive. (Hodkinson, 2008) Asynchronous generators use the mains as the excitation current and therefore require connection to the grid and will shut down in the event of a power outage; they cannot be used as a standby generator. In many cases the manufacturer of the prime mover and generator as an integrated, packaged assembly known as a genset. If the CHP is to be used as for standby capacity, a second back up CHP unit may be required so in the event of maintenance down time the facility is still able to avail of CHP generated electrical and thermal energy. (Hodkinson, 2008) 2.4.3 Heat Recovery Equipment The second stage of the CHP generating electricity is to recover and use the exhaust heat energy from the prime mover of the CHP unit. The successful operation of the CHP plant depends on the use of the heat produced by generating electricity. The simplest model is where the heat exchanger transfers the heat from the exhaust gases and engine water jacket to the boiler feed water to raise the temperature of the boiler feed water this water temperature is typically 70 to 850 C. (Hodkinson, 2008) When the heat is removed from the exhaust gases, the gas is discharged via a chimney into the atmosphere. Heat exchangers can come in different forms, the most common are,  Shell and tube  Plate  Cooling coil types. The heat exchangers performance depends on size of the heat transfer area; in some cases the heat recovery unit is larger than the fuel-burning unit to maximize the heat transfer, and an important variable is the temperature gradient. Liquids with greater temperature difference between hot and cool streams result in greater heat transfer rates. (Fin, 2010)
  • 20. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 20 2.5 CHP Range  GE’s Jenbacher Type 2 Gas Engine The Jenbacher type 2, gas engine was introduced in 1976 and its power output ranges from 250 to 350 kW. The CHP IS robust and has a guarantee of 60,000 operating hours before first major overhaul. Total efficiency is 89.1 % (General Electric, 2013).  GE’s Jenbacher Type 3 Gas Engine The Jenbacher Type 3 offers power in the range of 500 to 1,100 kW. Long service intervals and has a maintenance-friendly engine design. The total efficiency is up to 87.1 %. Fuel type is biogas, coke gas, natural gas, propane, landfill gas, sewage gas and special gases (e.g., coal mine gas, coke gas wood gas pyrolysis gas) (General Electric, 2013).  GE’s Jenbacher type 4 Gas Engine Based on the design of types 3 and 6 the type 4 is a modern engine in the 800 to 1500 kW power range with a total efficiency of up to 86.2 %. The type 4 engine gas types are, natural gas flare gas, biogas, landfill gas and coke gas. The heat recovery system is a two-stage oil plate heat exchanger (General Electric, 2013). 2.6 Barriers to developing CHP According to the CHP policy group report in February 2006, there is a lot of potential for development of CHP, but only a small number of new CHP units will be commissioned in the next couple of years, giving market barriers, economic return and investment risks that potential CHP developers face. The CHP project investment decision will be based on a comparison of the financial cost and risks of importing the electricity requirement for a site and producing heat internally from heat only-boilers or operating a CHP scheme supplemented by imported or exported electricity as required. The barriers and risks to implementing CHP in the hotel sector depend on typically on gas market price volatility that could deter potential investors.
  • 21. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 21 A sudden increase in natural gas could result in an increased cost in meeting their energy needs. Since gas is the fuel choice for the majority of CHP plants, the relationship between gas and electricity prices is critical to the CHP project. This is also known as spark-spread. The economics of a CHP investment is more viable when spark-spread is high, what this means is then the gas price is lower in comparison to the electricity price. For smaller CHP users, when the spark-spread is low the financial attractiveness of the small-scale CHP unit is reduced. 2.6.1 Awareness and Information Barriers If the installed capacityof CHP in Ireland is to grow significantly it is necessary to increase the level of awareness and information available. This can be achieved by introducing marketing programs, guidelines and feasibility studies. COGEN Europe is the European Association, for the Promotion of CHP projects. It is a Belgian non-profit organisation. Its aims are to work towards the wider use of CHP in Europe for a sustainable energy future. COGEN works at EU level with member states to develop energy policies and reduce the numbers of barriers to implementing CHP systems. The organisation is also responsible for annual conferences on cogeneration in Europe (COGEN Europe, 2013). An independent body called the Commission for Energy Regulation (CER) was established in 1999 under the electricity regulation act 1999. Its principle aim is to protect the interests of the existing and future customers. This is achieved by providing security of supply of energy services. Also by moving towards increased levels of renewable energy and reduced carbon emissions. The CER responsibilities are to ensure sufficient capacity in the systems to satisfy reasonable demands for supply for natural gas and electricity, to protect the interests of customers, including the elderly and disadvantaged in rural areas, promoting competition in electricity and gas markets and promoting research and the use of sustainable forms of energy that reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as adopting measures to protect the environment in all sectors in Ireland. Recently the CER has recently presented its five-year strategic plan for the 2010 - 2014 period. The commission has outlined 6 goals, under strategic goal 4, which is to ensure that:
  • 22. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 22  “The environment is protected”  “Actions 4.2 Renewables & Climate Change Package” -“4.2.1 we will ensure full implementation of the relevant aspects of the renewables and climate change package in the electricity and gas sectors” -“4.2.2 we will also challenge the sector to develop a formal environmental vision for the electricity industry in particular, where reducing emission in an integrated system is central, while not impacting on competitiveness. We hope to see initiatives from the energy sector in this area” (CER, 2009).  4.5 Demand Side Participation -“We will make customers more energy aware and will encourage all participants in the energy sector to deliver improved information on energy efficiency, demand side participation and the environmental impact of the energy sector to their customers. We will prioritise increased focus on the importance of Demand Side Management Participation over the course of this plan” (CER, 2009). 2.7 Climate Change In April 2007 the Irish government published the National Climate Change Strategy 2007-2012. This strategy sets out measures that will allow Ireland to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions meeting its Kyoto Protocol commitments. This National Climate Change Strategy is updated from the first strategy published by the government in 2000. The purpose of this strategy is to show the measures by which Ireland will meet its 2008-2012 commitments and to show how these measures position the country beyond 2012 and identify measures being researched and developed that will meet our eventual 2020 commitment (Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, 2007).
  • 23. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 23 Sir Nicholas Stern’s 700-page report to the UK Government on October 30th 2006, on the Economics of Climate Change ‘The Stern Review’ concluded: “The scientific evidence is now overwhelming: climate change presents very serious global risks, and it demands an urgent global response”. Since 1990 the greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland have raised considerably. This rise was mainly caused by a large increase in C02 emissions compared to other gases such as methane and nitrous oxides, which have remained more or less the same. Irelands CO2 emissions increase between 1990 and 2001 is as result of strong economic growth. In 1990, CO2 contributed 58.5 %, methane and nitrous oxides combined together totaled 41.4%, and F-gases (HFC, PFC, SF6 ) 3 contributed 1/ 1000th of all green house gas emissions. By 2004 CO2 emissions contribution increased to 66.1 %, methane and nitrous oxides dropped to 32.9 % while the F-gases contribution was 1 % (IEA/OECD, 2007). In figure 5 on the following page the graph displays a sectorial breakdown of the energy related CO2 emissions (96 % of energy related green house gases) and nitrous oxide and methane (remaining 4 % of energy related green house gases). According to the Energy in Ireland report prepared by the SEAI, the largest sectorial increase is in the transport sector, but since 2009 this has declined by 11.2 % and accounts for over one third of energy related CO2 emissions in 2011 while agriculture represents the lowest energy related CO2 emissions by sector (SEAI, 2012).
  • 24. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 24 Figure 5 Energy Related CO2 Emissions by Sector (SEAI, 2012) 2.7.1 Environmental Aspects of CHP CHP represents a highly efficient use of energy, which reduces the combustion products per unit of energy produced compared to traditional oil fired boilers and electricity generation stations. Consequently CHP will bring environmental benefits in the form of CO2 savings. The amount of CO2 savings resulting from CHP is difficult to calculate. A number of factors depend on such as:  The mix of electricity production in the country  The most marginal power plant on the system  The next power plant to be built by the power industry  The best theoretical power plant available. (Irish Energy Centre, 2001) The environmental benefits of installing CHP systems in Ireland are shown in table 2 on the following page, the emissions savings are only suggested and may vary.
  • 25. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 25 Table 2 R.Evans (1993) Environmental & Economic Implications of Small-Scale CHP, Energy Policy Emissions Estimated net reduction in emissions per kWh of electricity produced (g/kWh) CO2 (Carbon Dioxide) 1000 SO2 (Sulfur Dioxide) 17 NO2 (Nitrogen Dioxide) 4.6 CO (Carbon Monoxide) (3) CH4 (Methane) 3.9 2.8 National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020 It is noted in the national energy efficiency action plan that fossil fuels accounted for 96% of all energy use in Ireland in 2007. With the rising oil and gas prices, measures need to be in place to move towards a sustainable energy future. According to the NEEAP the most cost effective measure of reducing Irelands dependence on fossil fuels is energy efficiency. The government has committed to achieve a 20 % reduction in energy demand by 2020 through implementing energy efficiency measures. The 20 % reduction equates to 31925 Gig watt hours saved. The national energy efficiency action plan has outlined 90 actions, measures and programs, which will help reduce Irelands energy demand and reach the national target set by the action plan. (Dep. of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, 2009) 2.8.1 Energy Policies The Kyoto Protocol was agreed upon in Kyoto, Japan on December 1997. On February 16th 2009, 183 states signed and ratified the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC), aimed at combating global warming. The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. As stated by the UNFCC these amount to an average of 5% against 1990 levels over the five-year period 2008-2012. (United Nations, 2012)
  • 26. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 26 The Kyoto Protocol requires the significant reduction in Irish emissions of GHG’s or pays hefty fines. Under the Kyoto Protocol, industrialized countries are required to reduce the emissions of six greenhouse gases (CO2, which is the most important one, methane, nitrous oxide, hydro fluorocarbons, per fluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride) on average by 5.2 % below the 1990 levels during the first “commitment period” from 2008 to 2012. A five-year commitment period was chosen rather than a single target year to smooth out annual fluctuations in emissions due to uncontrollable factors such as weather. (United Nations Framework Convention, 2011) Key measures published by the National Climate Change Strategy 2007 – 2012 include production of electricity from renewable sources to increase to 15 % by 2010 and 33 % by 2020 Biomass to contribute up to 30 % of energy input at peat stations by 2015 and support for Combined Heat and Power projects. Measures for industrial, Commercial and Services, include building regulations and building energy rating, energy agreements programme, bio heat and CHP programs and support for eco- efficient technology and practices (Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, 2007) The EU Emissions Trading Scheme came into operation in January 2005, and under this scheme the C02 emissions of 12,000 installations across the EU are controlled on a cap and trade basis, over 100 installations in Ireland are in the scheme. The installation has to monitor its emissions and report the total emissions on an annual basis. The installation is the required to surrender allowances, where one allowance equals one tonne of CO2, if the installation cannot reduce its emissions during the course of the year more allowances must be bought or face high penalty fines. This strategy sets out to reduce emissions by 0.6 million tonnes in the industrial, commercial and services sector out of a total 3.02 million tonnes by 2012. 2.9 Connection to the Electricity Grid Network The Commissioner for Energy Regulation (CER) is responsible for overseeing the regulation of Ireland’s electricity and gas sectors. The Commission was initially established and granted regulatory powers over the electricity market under the Electricity Regulation Act, 1999.
  • 27. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 27 The CER published a revised process for the authorization and licensing of generation stations CER / 07 / 128 on the 30th of August 2007. The target audience is the owners and installers of small-scale and micro generation (CHP plants). The paper clarifies:  “In the decision paper CER / 07 / 128, the Commission directed that generators with a capacity not exceeding 1 MW will be deemed to be duly authorised and/or licensed by way of Order(s) issued pursuant to Section 14 (1A) and Section 16 (3A) of the Electricity Regulation Act 1999” (CER, 2008).  “Generators not exceeding 1 MW will be subject to specific terms and conditions as set out in the Orders but will not be required to notify the Commission in order to stand duly authorised and/or licensed” (CER, 2008). Sites with an existing connection seeking to install a small-scale CHP plant should only require a modification to their connection agreement. However a completed connection application form should be submitted regardless. If the site does not have an existing connection, the generator connection application can be made along with an application for a demand connection. 2.9.1 Connection Application Process  Step 1: Get an ordnance survey map and site plan The start of the application process is for the new or existing customer to get an ordnance survey map and site plan (1 : 2500 - 1 : 10560) which will highlight (in red) the location of the new CHP plant.  Step 2: Complete application form Complete the ESB Networks application form (NC5), The form should be submitted in situations where an applicant considers that they may be eligible for the connection process outside the group processing approach. The advantage is that the application may avoid the full rigors of the group processing rules.  Step 3: Return the application form The application form, along with a non-refundable deposit of 7000 euro is to be sent to ESB Networks in Athlone, Co. Westmeath.  Step 4: Receive a quotation and connection agreement Receive an acknowledgement and reference number
  • 28. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 28 - Connection Quotation The application fees for embedded generations are shown in the appendices - Connection Agreement The connection agreement will include the Maximum Import Capacity (MIC) and the Maximum Export Capacity (MEC).  Step 5: Return payment Post the payment and connection agreement to the ESB.  Step 6: Witness test date The technical data from the completed application will be evaluated to ensure there are no technical or protection omissions, which may need to be corrected prior to the witness test date (ESB Networks, 2010). 2.9.2 Requirements for Protection of Embedded CHP Installations The conditions governing connection to the distribution system is a document set out by ESB Networks lists requirements for customer’s equipment at the interface between the distribution system and the customer’s installation. Associated documentation with these conditions includes S.I. No. 44 /1993 – Safety, Health and Welfare At Work Regulations, 1993. “All electrical equipment and electrical installations shall at all times be so (a) Constructed, (b) Installed, (c) Maintained, (d) Protected, and (e) Used So as to prevent danger.” (Irish Statute Book, 1993) Generator protection is designed to disconnect the CHP plant from the ESB network, during irregular system conditions by tripping the main incoming circuit breaker or generator circuit breaker. The CHP plant interface objective is to protect the safety of ESB employees, the public and the network distribution system and also offers protection to the customers CHP plant and employees.
  • 29. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 29 Table 3 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). Devices Requirement Protection Devices Independent of other equipment and protection Located in a separate and secure compartment that can be sealed Provide backup protection to ensure isolation of the generator Comply with IEC Standard 60255 Table 4 Additional requirements for embedded generator installations-generator interface protection devices (ESB Networks, 2006). Devices Requirement Relays Protection Grade Visible indication of operation Accessible from ground level Clearly identified Monitor installation at ESB networks distribution connection voltage unless otherwise agreed between ESB networks and customer Monitor line voltage for under and over voltage protection in MV and 38kV installations Prevent re-closure of generator or main incomer CB until all relays have reset correctly 2.9.3 Synchronising  The synchronising facilities shall be provided on either the generator circuit breaker or the main incoming circuit breaker and synchronization should be fully automatic.  The operation of the switchgear where the customers could parallel unsynchronized generator equipment with ESB networks system shall be prevented by check synchronising facilities, or by the use of mechanical or electrical interlocking provided by the customer (ESB Networks, 2006). 2.10 Combined Heat & Power Deployment Programme In December 2005, the minister for Finance announced an allocation of 65 million euro over a period between 2006 and 2010 to launch several innovative grant schemes relating to combined heat and power, biofuels, biomass commercial heaters and domestic renewable heat grants.
  • 30. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 30 The deployment programme provided grant support to assist the deployment of small- scale (< 1 MWe) fossil fired CHP and biomass CHP systems. It took the place of the Combined Heat and power RD & D programme. The programme includes feasibility studies, to assist investigation into the application of CHP across all size ranges and technologies and investment grant support for small-scale fossil fired CHP with a capacity ≤ 50 kWe < 1 MWe (SEAI, 2010). The funding for qualifying projects was up to 40 %, maximum of 1.5 million euro per project. However due to the reduction of budget resources for 2011, the government CHP Deployment Programme that was administered by SEAI is no longer open for applications. The CHP Deployment Program was closed at the end of December 2010; under the scheme a total of 68 fossil fuelled small-scale CHP projects, totaling 15.7 MWe, 3 MWe of biomass CHP and 250 kWe of anaerobic digestion CHP (SEAI, 2012). 2.11 Sizing a CHP Plant The over all cost for installing a CHP plant may be high, so it’s very important to operate the plant efficiency. It is important that the CHP is running every day or around 5000 hours per year. The CHP must be sized on the heat demand. It is also important that other energy efficiency measures such as energy efficient light bulbs etc., this will help to reduce the overall size of the CHP plant and lead to capital investment savings on purchasing the plant. To calculate heat and power demands of the building, there are two ways,  Building management system The BMS can monitor historical energy usage over long periods of time. It can determine demand profiles throughout the day (early morning and evening times), week days and weekend periods and summer and winter months.  Analyzing gas and electricity bills If there’s no BMS available, obtaining a monthly electricity and gas bills over a period of one year and entering the data on to a spreadsheet. The monthly bills will give an indication of the consumption of fuel and electricity throughout the year. By getting in contact with the supply authority they will be able to supply the customer with half-hourly meter readings, this information will can be used to compile energy profiles. (Carbon Trust, 2012)
  • 31. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 31 2.12 Reviewing CHP Case Study’s Carried Out in the Hotel Sector In order for the author to ascertain a good understanding of this research for small- scale CHP systems. The author will identify areas of previous research by SEI and the Irish Energy Center for benchmarking CHP systems in the hotel sector and will be highlighted in the literature review. 2.12.1 Jury’s Hotel and Towers – Dublin Jury’s Hotel an established hotel for nearly 40 years is located in Ballsbridge, Dublin. The hotel comprises of 300 bedrooms, restaurants, pub, leisure center and 20-meter swimming pool. A further 100 rooms are located in an adjoining block. Prior to the installation of the CHP system, inefficient unreliable boilers rated at 4765 kg/h provided hot water and heating for the hotel. Inenco were appointed to carryout an energy survey and review the hot water and heating system, with a view to recommend energy saving measures and improve reliability. Inenco are an energy consultancy firm specializing in energy procurement, sustainability, reporting and analysis. Temp Technology was awarded the contract to install the CHP and carry out monitoring and maintenance of the plant. 2.12.2 Project Description  A complete redesign of the heating systems  Installation of two new steam boilers and low pressure hot water boilers  Installation of a CHP unit for the electrical (304 kWe) and thermal (445 kW) requirements, with a fuel input of 999 kW.  Main requirement of keeping the hotel open with no disruptions to hot water or power  Grant aid was made available from the Irish Energy Centre  Project payback period was over 3 years 2.12.3 Plant Operation The CHP plant is operational for 15 hours a day, 365 days a year, during peak hours 8 am to 11 pm. The CHP unit has an on board computer which allows Temp Technology to monitor the plant.
  • 32. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 32 The advantage of this is that if a fault develops it can be monitored and dealt with before it causes the plant to break down. This offers the client trouble free operation of the plant. A documented monthly log of the CHP performance is then sent to the facilities manger in Jury’s hotel. Maintenance is carried out once every 53 days (800 hrs.) this includes changing sparkplugs, fuel and air filters. 2.12.4 Project Results Before the installation of the CHP plant, the hotels energy bill per year for oil, natural gas and electricity was over 380,000 Euro. Installing the CHP plant has resulted in savings of up to 63,000 Euro in energy costs per year. Capital costs for the project was approximately 240,000 Euro. The pay back period on the project was 3.8 years. Not only does the CHP plaint offer financial benefits it also reduces greenhouse gases emitted. According to Temp Technology “CHP is environmentally friendly (in comparison to conventional power generation) and gives a reduction on C02 levels of 0.8kg per KWe” (Temp Technology, 2012).
  • 33. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 33 3.0 Chapter 3: Methodology 3.1 Introduction This chapter outlines the research methodology of this study. The author’s aims are to succeed in examining the status of small-scale CHP systems within the hotel sector in Ireland. The research was conducted in two phases:  In the first phase, a qualitative approach was used to collect data,  And in the second phase a quantitative approach was used. It is important that the author’s methods will be quantitive and qualitive to achieve the main research objectives, goals and questions set in this thesis. Carol Grbich explains in her book “Qualitative data analysis an introduction” the advantage of utilizing an innovative mix of data sources (qualitative and quantitative) is that, apart from providing a broader view of the research question, it allows the reader to view the phenomenon under study from different perspectives.  The advantages of combining quantitive and qualitative data are that you can maximize the impact of both.  For mixed methods to be successful, issues of sampling, design, and data analysis and data presentation need careful attention (Grbich, 2007). 3.2 ResearchObjectives The objectives of this study were to:  Research the relevant environmental policies and available grants for the proposed CHP plant, these include, Kyoto Protocol, EU Emissions Trading Scheme and Climate Change Strategy Ireland.  Discuss the outcomes of the CHP plant in the Osprey Hotel and Spa and see where improvements can be made.  To research available grants for the installation of gas powered CHP in hotel sector in Ireland.  To investigate the feasibility of installation of CHP plant in the Osprey Hotel and Spa.  To examine the barriers to CHP.  To carry out an environmental study on the proposed gas fuelled CHP plant.  To perform a data analysis and financial appraisal on the proposed plant.
  • 34. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 34 3.3 Methods for Collecting Data The materials used in this thesis consisted of several items such as books, reports and journals. Researching through the Internet provide all resources required to carry out the dissertation. The author will first apply different types of qualitative research methods. After the authors kick off meeting with the DIT project supervisor and obtaining an excellent understanding of small-scale CHP plants using the most up to date information via the DIT library and world wide web. During a site visit to the Osprey Hotel and Spa in Naas all the relevant data was collected and then analysed. The methodology for this thesis includes various methods for collecting data for small-scale CHP plants. The data was obtained during on site visits and phone calls to the facilities manager before writing the dissertation. All data and information was collected between January 2013 and March 2013 during a site visit to the Naas Osprey Hotel and Spa between February and March 2013. All the information were examined and entered into Microsoft Excel and charts and tables were create is illustrate the findings from the site visits. In an attempt to ascertain the validity of the author’s findings, one set of data will be crosschecked against another. Quantitative analysis of the electricity and gas bills will provide an understanding of the running costs of the CHP plant. After the authors discussion with the facilities manager it was noted that the CHP was shut down during a three week period for re- building works/upgrades in November 2011, varying costs as a result, will give an insight in to the annual savings the Hotel benefits from the CHP plant. The cost of maintenance per annum plus the initial capital costs of installing the plant will be incorporated into the analysis to determine the benefits.
  • 35. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 35 3.4 Project Description Figure 6 Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa The Naas Osprey Hotel and Spa located on 8 acres in Naas, Co Kildare, built in 2003. The complex includes the Osprey Hotel, Spa, Conference Centre, Crèche, Business Campus, Health and Leisure, which incorporates a 25-meter swimming pool and Time bar and nightclub. The hotel has 104 bedrooms with two penthouses suites with hot tubs, restaurant, bar and lounge with ballroom. The Conference center has 16 self- contained meeting rooms. Figure 7 Ariel View of the Osprey Complex
  • 36. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 36 The health and leisure center includes a 20-meter swimming pool, gym with over 100 pieces of equipment. The Osprey Spa comprises of 8 treatment rooms. The Time Bar and Nightclub can host events for up to 2000 people and boast’s 9 bars. The total area serviced by the CHP plant is 221,168 ft2 or 20,547.2 m2 With the increase in electricity prices in 2004/05 and after the ESB receiving further approval for a 16 % increase in 2006. In order to reduce energy costs for the hotel two approaches were examined by the managing director of the Osprey Hotel, Mr. Ole Andersen  Reduce energy consumption through energy efficient measures  Reduce electricity bills through CHP generation. F4energy undertook the Combined Heat and Power project. At the design stage a report carried out incorporating the following,  12-month historic heat and electricity consumption.  The peak electrical and heat loads  Detailed annual energy savings, pre and post CHP  Site survey/ proposed location The managing director Mr. Ole Andersen took the decision to proceed with the CHP project in September 2005. F4energy installed the CHP plant. The CHP installation project included a gas-fired Mercedes Benz 324 KWe engine, with an electrical and thermal output of 324 KWe and 485 KW respectively. The capital costs of installing the CHP plant were 300,000 Euro. With F4energy liaising with the ESB and Bord Gais the project was completed in 19 weeks. No interruption to the hotels electricity or hot water during the 19 weeks of installation and commissioning works. In addition to energy efficient measures taken the CHP scheme was designed to reduce ESB daytime consumption.
  • 37. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 37 4.0 Chapter Four: Data Collection 4.1 Introduction The data on the energy consumption of the hotel was gathered by reviewing the electricity and gas bills. The installers of the CHP monitor the CHP plant and review billing data. The total gas energy consumption is metered by Bord Gais and the electricity is metered by the ESB. 4.2 CHP Operation The CHP plant is integrated with the hotels existing electrical and heating system, the plant is designed to operate in parallel with the mains electricity supply, allowing the deficit between the site demand and the CHP plant to be imported from the grid. This ensures the security of the electricity supply in the event of the CHP unit fails, and the existing gas boiler is on standby when required. The hotel will avail of the ESB’s maximum demand tariff by reducing its peak demand during the day. The CHP provides 129,895 kWh of electricity per month that otherwise would be purchased from the supply authority. Table 5 CHP plant operation Energy Requirement Energy Source Day time heat CHP 100% Day time electricity CHP 60% External Provider 40% Night time heat CHP 100% Night time electricity External Provider 100% 4.3 Sizing of the CHP Plant As a rule of thumb once a building has a demand for heat and power for more than 5000 hours per year an investment in to the scheme will be viable. It was noted after the author’s discussion with F4 Energy’s managing director that the CHP was sized on the electrical load and not the thermal base load, which is present throughout the year. A feasibility study compiled by F4 Energy which reviewed the hotels 12 month electricity consumption which was estimated at peak times 900kW and an average load of 500kW.
  • 38. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 38 4.4 CHP Description CHP-unit for natural gas operation with synchronous generator FMB-400- GSMK Electrical Power 324/319kWe @PF=1.0/0.8 Thermal power 485kW from jacket water lube oil and exhaust Gas consumption (LHV) 911kW (LHV = lower heat value) Fuel Type Natural Gas Frequency 50 Hz Voltage 400 volts Power to Heat Ratio 1: 1.5 Electrical Efficiency 35.7% Thermal Efficiency 53.2% Total Efficiency 88.8% Losses 11.1% 4.5 CHP Control System The control system and the switchgear for the CHP plant are mounted on the base frame and are connected to the unit. The synchronous generator is connected in parallel with the electrical grid. The CHP plant is remotely monitored by F4energy the suppliers and installers of the plant. Monitoring and service work is carried out under warranty covering all parts and labour for the first two years. Electrical and gas bills are reviewed by F4energy and the facilities manager to ensure the hotel is on the best national grid tariffs. The heat output from the CHP unit is 830 C, and is fed into a hot water return header. During the summer months some of the thermal energy from the CHP unit is dissipated to the atmosphere by use of a blast radiator.
  • 39. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 39 Figure 8 Simplified diagram of typical low voltage combined heat and power electrical system (Source: CIBSE AM12) Figure 9 Mains Incomer and switch fuse for CHP plant
  • 40. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 40 The PLC system, which monitors and controls the CHP plant, has the following functions: Start Stop Control Program  Start delay on 0-20 s  Starter motor on  After reaching cranking speed, ignition on, 2 seconds later, gas solenoid valves open  After reaching ignition speed, starter motor off, monitoring of unit on  After reaching nominal speed, synchronising with the grid takes place Demand for Stop  Load control down  Generator circuit breaker open  Gas solenoid valves shut  After 20 seconds ignition out Figure 10 CHP Control Interface Display Units At the design stage analysis the base load was equated to be approximately 330KWe and the CHP was sized to suit. After the authors discussion with the facilities manager it was noted that the hotels demand for electricity increases in the summer months due to air conditioning in the hotel. On the 14th of February the during the authors site visit the electrical work done on the control interface display was recorded at 9, 339, 666 kWh.
  • 41. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 41 A return visit on the 14th of March to the hotel to record the reading and it was re- recorded at 9, 469, 561 kWh. Therefore the electrical work done by the CHP plant for that monthly period was 129, 895 kWh. The electricity supplier provides the remaining electrical energy, which equates to 125,000 KWh per month but will increase in the summer months because its peak season in the hotel industry. Figure 11 Schmitt Enertec Monitoring Unit interface All data such as power, temperatures and pressures are continuously monitored by the control system interface on the plant, (in figure 6). The interface is fitted with a display with semi graphics, 12 function keys and alphanumeric keys. All failures can be shown on the display with the date and time of their appearance. The machine interface can display all data these include,  Jacket water temperature  Jacket water level  Hot water temperature  Lube oil pressure and level  Oxygen in exhaust (Lamdba Sensor)  Electrical power  Generator voltage  Grid voltage
  • 42. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 42 4.6 F4 Energy Remote Monitoring The CHP plant is monitored by F4 Energy using a web based SCADA system (Supervisory Control and Data System) that allows supervision and control of the CHP plant. All monitoring and service work is carried out under a fixed-price warranty covering all parts and all labour All grid electricity and gas bills are reviewed to ensure that the hotel is receiving the least expensive grid tariff. 4.7 Heat Meter Figure 12 CF Echo 11 Ultrasonic Heats and Cooling Meter The heat meter is used to accurately measure and monitor the hot water released from the CHP plant by the use of a set of temperature probes. The meter collects the information and displays the results; the temperature range is between 00 C and 1800 C The heating and cooling meter fulfills the EC regulations according to DIN EN 1434. (Itron, 2011)
  • 43. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 43 4.8 Gas Meter Figure 13 Itron MZ turbine gas meter The MZ meter measures the flow of natural gas up to 10,000m3 and has a pressure range of up to 100 bar The MZ meter is intrinsic safe approved BVS 95.d.2118. The flow of gas turns a turbine wheel; the speed of the turbine blade is proportional to the flow of gas. 4.9 Acoustic and Vibration Attenuation Internal combustion engines and gas turbines generate noise and vibration that need to be attenuated where CHP is to be integrated into buildings. Packaged units typically come in attenuated enclosures, but care is still required when installing and integrating the units into the building. The sound pressure level of 75 dB (A) within 1 meter of the exhaust is achieved with the use of an exhaust silencer. Because the CHP plant is located in the underground car park adjacent to the Main hotel entrance lobby the CHP does not require a high degree of attenuation. With the car park constructed out of concrete, this acts as a vibration damper for the CHP plant.
  • 44. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 44 Figure 14 CHP Plant located in the Osprey underground car park
  • 45. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 45 5.0 Chapter Five: Data analysis and Discussion of Results 5.1 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 In order to establish the operational costs for the hotel analysis of the quantitative data made available on gas and electricity consumption of the hotel has been undertaken. The tables and graphs provide the details of the costs of electricity and gas consumed, and will establish if the CHP is proving to be beneficial to the hotel, financially. The chart in figure 8 below provides a monthly breakdown of electricity and gas charges over one year period starting on the 1st of January and ending on the 31st of December. During December the CHP was out of service due to mechanical problems so for the month of December the backup gas boiler was used to supply hot water/heat it can be seen from table five that the increase in the electricity charges for the month of December electrical requirement by the hotel was met by the supply authority. With the CHP in service providing the base load of the hotel is worked out 129, 895 kWh per month. Figure 15 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000 Euro Month Electricity & Gas Charges for 2011 Electricity Gas
  • 46. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 46 For an example of a typical gas and electricity bill see the appendix for a sample. Table 6 Electricity and Gas Charges for 2011 Month Electricity (Euro) Gas (Euro) January 14357.58 22150.41 February 14775.15 22176.49 March 14900.23 21270.76 April 15144.56 22190.89 May 15239.75 22178.43 June 15985.57 22101.54 July 16034.87 22059.71 August 15849.71 21987.58 September 15579.74 22168.34 October 15471.11 22241.56 November 14190.43 22309.61 December 24954.04 22188.46 Table 7 Hotel Expenditure for 2011 Total Electricity and Gas Total Cost € Total Electricity from 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2011 €192,482.7 Total Gas from 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2011 €265,023.78 Total Energy Costs for 2011 €457,506.48 5.2 Simple Payback Calculations The annual electricity costs without the CHP in service is estimated at 299,448 Euro (figures taken from figure 22 in the appendices). The monthly electricity bills are calculated at 14,000 Euro with a increase estimated at 16,000 Euro in the summer months. The annual electricity costs with the CHP in service for a full calendar year is estimated at 182,482.70 Euro (note in 2011 the CHP was shut down in December due to mechanical problems, electricity cost for 2011 was 192,482.70 Euro). The total annual electricity savings as a result of the CHP is estimated at 117,819.30 Euro. The annual Maintenance costs amount to 10,000 Euro excluding parts and equipment. After maintenance costs the annual savings are estimated at 107,628 Euros.
  • 47. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 47 The Simple Payback method is calculated as follows, 𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑦𝑏𝑎𝑐𝑘(𝑦𝑟𝑠.) = (€)𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 ÷ (€)𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑠 𝑆. 𝑃𝐵.= €300,000 ÷ €107,819.30 = 2.8 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 This figure is not accurate because of assumptions had to be made on the electricity bills. With the CHP out of service for only one month, the only bill available was the month of December 2011 (figure 22 in the appendices) when all electricity consumed was purchased from Energia. 5.2.1 Net Present Value Payback Calculations The Net Present Value (NVP) has an advantage over the simple payback method. NVP compares the value of the euro today to the value of that same euro in the future, taking into account inflation. If the NVP of the project is positive it should be accepted and if it is negative it should be rejected. Table 8 NPV method using discounted cash flow DCF 10% NET NPV Capital Investment 1 300,000 -300,000 Year 1 .909 107,628 97,833.85 Year 2 .826 107,628 88,900.73 Year 3 .751 107,628 80,828.63 Year 4 .683 107,628 73,509.92 NVP +41,073.13
  • 48. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 48 5.3 Electrical and Gas Energy Consumption for 2011 Table 9 Electrical and gas consumption in KWh for 2011 Naas Osprey Hotel & Spa January 2011 to December 2011 Electrical Consumption Gas Consumption Month KWh KWh Jan 254,390 503,509 Feb 256,387 504,346 Mar 255874 504,874 Apr 256,098 505,532 May 270,954 505,296 Jun 283,649 504,538 Jul 280,132 505,687 Aug 275,089 503,976 Sep 260,354 504,874 Oct 257,248 505,389 Nov 255,592 505,042 Dec 216,031 (CHP OFF) 470,349 (CHP OFF) Figure 16 Electricity and gas consumption 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec KWh Electricity and Gas Consumption Electricity Gas
  • 49. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 49 5.4 Analysis of the Electrical Energy Costs Energia supplies the electricity, it has over 60,000 business customers and it is the largest independent energy supply company in Ireland and is licensed by the Commission for energy Regulation. The annual electricity consumption generated from the CHP plant is 1,558,740 kWh /year and from the electricity grid is 1,563,058 kWh /year. Based on categories for business end users of electricity. This level of consumption falls under band-IC Maximum Import Capacity (MIC) is the level of electrical capacity contracted between the hotel and the electrical supplier, The PSO charge on the bill is based on the contracted MIC level, which is 580KVA. A Service Capacity Charge based on the MIC if it is exceeded the hotel must pay and excess Capacity Charge. Distribution use of system (DUoS) is a charge that the ESB Networks charges the electricity supplier (Energia) for the use of the electricity distribution system. This charge is passed from Energia on to the customer’s bill. The amount of DUoS that is charged depends on the type of connection, the voltage or if electricity is exported. The DUoS group for the hotel is DG7, (Medium Voltage MD Customers). Meter Configuration Code (MCC) is a code used to describe the type of meter that measures the amount of electricity that passes through the connection point. Referring to the electricity bill the code is MCC 10. This term stands for, “quarter hourly: 2 channel recorder_imports KWs and KVArs. MD KWs AND MD KVArs recorded every 15 minutes 24 hours, 7 days, all year”. (ESB Networks, 2010) “The Transmission Use of System (TUoS) charges are where, all transmission connected generators and distribution-connected generators with an MEC ≥ 10MW are liable for Generation TUoS charges. In addition all transmission and distribution connected generators are liable for Demand TUoS charges” (ESB Networks, 2010).
  • 50. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 50 It is noted in the electrical costs in table 6, that the summer months from May to August represent the greatest electrical consumption from the grid throughout the year however even with this reduced demand for electricity in the winter months the CHP plant must remain in full operation mode to ensure that the maximum running hours are maintained if the system is to be financially viable. 5.4.1 Analysis of the Gas Energy Costs The delivered quantity of gas per month is consistent throughout the year. The CHP plant is fully operational 15 hours a day 7 days a week throughout the year. Referring to the Bord Gais energy bill for the month of November the delivered quantity of gas consumed is 45,260 m3, by applying the conversion factor of 10.7 (taken from the CIBSE guide F), the kWh equivalent can be calculated, this equates to 505,042 kWh of energy. The Imbalance Gas Charge is a rebate credited back to the customer. It is explained in the Gaslink website that: “A Shipper's imbalance is the difference between the Shipper's Entry Allocation and their Exit Allocation. Each Gas Day the Transporter "cashes-out" each of the network Shippers' Imbalances. Any quantity of gas left in the network is in effect bought by the Transporter from the Shipper while excess quantities of gas taken from the network by Shippers, is charged by the Transporter to Shippers” (Gaslink, 2008). The imbalance pricing structure was approved by the CER in April 2007, with a request to update the pricing semi annually. The Gas price plan agreed by Bord Gais for the Osprey Hotel is designed to suit the way the hotel operates on a daily basis. The tariff made available is Daily Metered Non-Swing, this option analysis the gas consumed on a daily basis give the customer the best value. With the CHP operating 15 hours a day, 7 days a week the gas usage is not going to deviate and therefore the customer will not have to pay a swing charge. A swing charge allows a customer a +/- 15% variation in usage. Every month the gas usage is reviewed and if that usage goes beyond the variation then additional charges will be incurred. (Bord Gais Energy, 2010)
  • 51. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 51 5.4.2 CHP Fuel Input The tariff for the customer costs 2.3646 per unit (kWh) of delivered quantity of gas. In producing 324 kWe of electricity and 485 kW of thermal energy the CHP will consume on average 505,042 kWh or 45,260 m3 of gas per month. 5.5 Building Energy Benchmarking The performance of the hotel that is expressed in kg C02 /m2 per year can be calculated using the yearly electricity consumption (kWh). The result is compared with published benchmarks in the CIBSE Guide F Energy Efficiency in Buildings. The performance ratings are expressed in “good practice” and “typical practice”. The basis of the benchmark is the electricity in kWh by the treated floor area of the hotel. The annual electricity consumption generated from the CHP plant is 1,558,740 kWh /year and from the electricity grid is 1,563,058 kWh /year. The treated area of the hotel is 20,547 m2 1,558,740 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 + 1,563,058 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 = 3,121,798 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 3,121,798 𝑘𝑊ℎ/𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 ÷ 20,547 𝑚2 = 151.9 𝑘𝑊. ℎ. 𝑚2 / 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 Referring to table 20.1 in the CIBSE guide F under hotels (-luxury) The figures given are 90 kW.h.m2 / year (good practice) and 150kW.h.m2 / year (typical practice). Therefore the hotel will fit under typical practice at 151.9 kW.h.m2 / year. The performance indicator must be treated with caution because it’s the value is only a broad indicator of efficiency. (CIBSE, 2004) 5.6 Maintenance and Servicing Maintenance and servicing methods are becoming more structured and documented. CHP plants require maintenance it can be carried out by maintenance staff, or in the Osprey hotel F4energy the contractors who installed the plant. Under a fixed price warranty covering all parts and all labour. F4energy will monitor the CHP with a direct link to the system from their offices in order to highlight problems before they cause breakdowns.
  • 52. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 52 In the F4energy field service report on the following page, the description of the service actions carried out on the 13th of September 2010 are as follows  “Replacement of under-voltage relays in generator circuit” Figure 17 Typical F4energy service report The maintenance schedule carried out in the Osprey hotel is a pro-active approach to maintenance that accurately documents and records all work carried out throughout the lifespan of the plant. The CHP plant report file has a unique identification number (figure 18), this number is quoted in all maintenance activities or modification carried out on the piece of equipment. Figure 18 Maintenance Schedule, front page
  • 53. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 53 5.7 Environmental Benefits of the CHP Plant In order for the author to calculate the carbon footprint of the Osprey Hotel, the accuracy of the footprint relies on collating data for all the emission sources. Consumption of gas data in KWh from Bord Gais energy bills must be collected, and electricity in KWh consumed from the grid must be collected for 12 months of the year. Total electricity consumed for 2011 (2,905,767 KWh) CHP generated electricity for 2011 (1,558,740 KWh) From the above readings the amount of electricity purchased from the grid can be calculated by subtracting the two and this results in 1,347,047 KWh. The carbon footprint is measured in tonnes of CO2 (t CO2 e), and is calculated using the data collected and multiplied by emission factors. Total Gas consumed for 2011 (5,553,063 KWh) Total grid electricity for 2011 (1,347,047 KWh) The energy conversion factors, which are taken from Part L2A of the building regulations conversion factors, published in 2006. It can be seen that emissions associated with grid supplied electricity is more than twice that per unit of gas delivered, the complete chart is in the appendices, figure 32. Table 10 CO2 emission factors by fuel type (Electric Ireland)(CIBSE Guide F) Fuel Units KgCO2 per kWh Delivered Grid Electricity KWh 0.532 Natural Gas KWh 0.194 The energy conversion factors in table 9 relate to CO2 emissions by fuel type (kg CO2/ kWh delivered). These factors do not account for indirect emissions such as extraction of natural gas or refining oil. The conversion factor for grid electricity and natural gas is obtained from the electric Ireland website and CIBSE guide F respectively.
  • 54. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 54 5.7.1 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Grid Electricity 𝐺𝑟𝑖𝑑 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 1,347,047 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.532 = 716,629 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ 5.7.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Saved by using CHP Plant The on-site electricity generated from the CHP that would otherwise be purchased from the grid is 1,558,740 KWh for 2011, so the greenhouse gas emissions saved can be calculated. 𝐺𝑟𝑖𝑑 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑆𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑑 1,558,740 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.532 = 829,250 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ By displacing national grid electricity the Osprey CHP plant has reduced the sites carbon emissions by 829,250 Kg CO2 per kWh delivered. 5.7.3 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Created from Natural Gas The Osprey hotel consumed 5,553,063 KWh of natural gas during 2011, which equates to a delivered quantity of 497,645 m3. 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝑎𝑠 5,553,063 𝐾𝑊ℎ × 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟 0.194 = 1,077,294 𝐾𝑔 𝐶𝑂2 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑘𝑊ℎ 5.7.4 Osprey Hotel Carbon Footprint Table 11 Osprey Hotel carbon footprint Fuel kWh CO2 ratio KgCO2 /kWh Grid Supplied Electricity 1,347,047 0.532 716,629 CHP (Natural Gas) 5,553,063 0.194 1,077,294 Total 1,793,923 By displacing the national grid electricity, the osprey CHP plant reduces the site’s carbon emissions by 829 Tonnes of CO2 per annum.
  • 55. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 55 5.8 Osprey Hotel CHP Plant Efficiency While sizing the plant to meet the hotels minimum heat demands, from the data collected during the site visit, it is noted the CHP plant is not operating at 100 %. The maximum electrical output of the plant is 324 KWe. From figure 10 the CHP control interface the plant is running at 95 % of its capacity, “EL. Power =311 kW” (Source: Figure 10) 311 𝑘𝑊𝑒 ÷ 324 𝑘𝑊𝑒 = 95 % The CHP efficiency, operating the CHP at 100 % capacity is as follows, 𝐹𝑢𝑒𝑙 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 911 𝑘𝑊 × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠. = 4,987,725 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑖𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝐸𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 324 𝑘𝑊𝑒 × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠.= 1,773,900 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 485 𝑘𝑊𝑡ℎ × 5475 ℎ𝑟𝑠. = 2,655375 𝑘𝑊ℎ 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 = 1,773,900 4,987,725 = 0.356 = 35.6 % 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 = 2,655,375 4,987,725 = 0.532 = 53.2 % 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝐶𝐻𝑃 𝑃𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 88.8%
  • 56. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 56 6.0 Chapter Six: Conclusion and Summary Having collected all the relevant data and information on the operation of the CHP plant in the Osprey hotel, the author then analysed the cost of natural gas, which supplies 60% of the daytime electrical load via the CHP plant. From this the author established the avoided electricity costs from using the small-scale CHP plant in the hotel, which would otherwise be purchased from the electricity supplier. The economic viability of a CHP plant is currently dependent on competitive gas and electricity prices (spark spread), and it must be operational for up to 5000 hours per annum. In 2005 the net cost savings in the feasibility study carried out by F4 Energy was approx. 135,000 Euro. With gas prices increased by up to 30% the net savings per annum have reduced to approx. 107,000 Euro, but with rising electricity costs also rising CHP projects are still attractive investments and have relatively short pay back periods. The combined total cost for gas and electricity was evaluated over a 1-year period. A CHP feasibility study carried out by F4 Energy in July 2005, a payback period of 2 years was estimated. This unit rate is noted over the 12 monthly billing periods from July 2004 to July 2005. The Authors feasibility study was carried out using 2011 gas prices and a pay back period of 2.8 years using the simple pay back method and net present value was calculated. The main benefits discussed by the author of operating a CHP plant is that the cost of natural gas does not vary throughout the day unlike electricity which is more expensive during peak times during the day depending on the tariff. The plant lifecycle is estimated at 10-15 years which some might say is relatively short but a plant that cost 300,000 to install can save an estimated 1,605,000 million euro in energy costs its lifecycle.
  • 57. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 57 After discussions with F4 energy it was noted that CHP wasn’t sized on the site heat demand, with the electrical peak electrical load calculated at 900kW and an average load of 500kW, a detailed energy costs of pre CHP versus post CHP was calculated. During the summer months some of the thermal energy from the CHP unit is dissipated to the atmosphere by use of a blast radiator. The author investigated whether on not the CHP plant could be operated at 75% to reduce the thermal energy being wasted in the summer months but this results in the loss of electrical efficiency of the CHP. During the course of the investigation of the economic viability of a CHP plant in the Osprey Hotel the author discovered several areas of the system improvements could deliver even more savings per annum and a user-friendly system. By incorporating a BMS can help collect information such as meter readings, flow and return temperatures, a BMS can extract information and log it in a so it can be a source of useful information and prepare for inspection and maintenance procedures.
  • 58. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 58 7.0 Bibliography Bord Gais Energy. (2010). Business Energy - Large Business - Gas Price Plans. Retrieved March 22, 2013, from Bord Gais Energy: www.bordgasienergy.ie/business/high-volume/gas-price-plans/ Carbon Trust. (2004). Good Practice Guide, Combined heat and power for buildings. Actionenergy . London, UK. Carbon Trust. (2012, September). Introducing combined heat and power, Anew generation of energy and carbon savings. Retrieved Feburary 4, 2013, from Carbon Trust: www.carbontrust.com/media/19529/ctv044_introducing_combined_heat_and_power. pdf CER. (2009). CER Strategic Plan 2010-2014. Retrieved February 15, 2013, from Commission for Energy Regulation: www.cer.ie/en/about-us-strategic- plan.aspx?article=d60a49e4-4119-95f7-99844e9f397a CER. (2008). Revised Process for the Authorisation and Licensing of Generation Stations-Clarification of Decision CER/07/128. CER. CHPA. (2013). Advantages & Benefits of CHP. Retrieved Feburary 16, 2013, from Combined Heat and Power Association: www.chpa.co.uk/advantages--benefits-of- chp_183.html CIBSE. (2004). CIBSE Guide F (Vol. 2). Norwich, Norfolk, Great Britian: CIBSE Publications Department. COGEN Europe. (2013). Retrieved February 13, 2013, from COGEN Europe: www.cogeneurope.eu/mission-and-objectives_49.html Dep. of Communications, Energy and Natural Resources. (2009). Maximising Ireland's Energy Efficiency, The National Energy Efficiency Action Plan 2009-2020. pdf, Dublin. Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government. (2007). Ireland National Climate Change Strategy 2007-2012. Retrieved november 13, 2011, from http://climate%change20%20stratege%20ireland%202007.pdf Energylinx. (2000). Gas Conversion m3 to kWhs. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from Energylinx: www.//energylinx.co.uk/gas_meter_conversion_meters.html
  • 59. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 59 Environmental Protection Agency. (2013). Emissions Trading. Retrieved Feburary 8, 2013, from Environmental Protection Agency: www.epa.ie/whatwedo/climate/emissionstrading/ ESB Networks. (2006, March 2). Conditions Governing Connection to the Distribution System. Retrieved March 10, 2013, from www.esb.ie/esbnetworks/en/downloads/conditions_governing_connection_embedded _generation_mv_38kv.pdf ESB Networks. (2010). Connect a Generator that will Operate in Parallel with the Electricity Network. Retrieved March 8, 2013, from ESB Networks: www.esb.ie/esbnetworks/en/generator-connections/gen_connection_no_export.jsp Eurostat. (2012). Energy, transport and environment indicators. Belgium: Publications Office of the European Union. Fin, D. (2010). Cogeneration A Users Guide (Vol. 1). London, UK: The Institution of Engineering and Technology. Gaslink. (2008). Imbalance Price. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from Gaslink: www.gaslink.ie/index.jsp?p=185&n=221&a=0 General Electric. (2013). Gas Engines-Power Geneation. Retrieved March 2, 2013, from General Electric Company: www.ge- energy.com/products_and_services/products/gas_engines_power_genration/ Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis an introduction. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Hodkinson, D. O. (2008). Faber & Kell's Heating and Air-Conditioning of Buildings. Oxford, Great Britain: Elsevier. Horlock, J. (1997). Cogeneration Combined Heat and Power Thermodynamics and Economics. Cambridge, Great Britian: Krieger Publishing Company. IEA/OECD. (2007). Energy Policies of IEA Countries Ireland 2007 Review. Paris, France: IEA Publications. Irish Energy Centre. (2001). An Examination of the Future Potential of CHP in Ireland. Retrieved February 23, 2013, from www.seai.ie/uploadedfiles/InfoCentre/chpreport.pdf Irish Statute Book. (1993). S.I. No. 44/1993 - Safety, Health and Welfare At Work (General Application) Regulations, 1993. Retrieved March 10, 2013, from Irish Statute Book: www.irishstatutebook.ie
  • 60. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 60 Itron. (2011, March 29). CF Echo 11 uitrasonic compact heat and cooling meter Qp 0.6-15m3/h. Retrieved 2013, from www.temetra.com/wp- content/uploads/2011/10/CF-ECHO-11.PDF PB Power for The Royal Academy of Engineering. (n.d.). The Cost of Generating Electricity. Retrieved november 26, 2011, from http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/pubblications/list/reports/Cost_Generation_Commenta rty.pdf SEAI. (2000). A Guide to CHP in Ireland. Retrieved February 24, 2013, from www.seai.ie/Publications/Renewables_Publications_/CHP/Guide_to_CHP_in_Ire_lo w_.pdf SEAI. (2006, February). CHP in Ireland options for a national policy to 2010. Retrieved Febryary 16, 2013, from www.seai.ie/About_Energy/Energy_Policy/National_Policy_Drivers/CHP_Policy_Gr oup_Report_18082006.pdf SEAI. (2010, October 3). Combined Heat and Power Deployment Programme. Retrieved February 12, 2012, from www.seai.ie/Grants/CHP/CHP_Applications_Guide.pdf SEAI. (2012). Combined Heat and Power in Ireland. Dublin: EPSSU. SEAI. (2012). Energy in Ireland 1990-2011, 2012 Report. Retrieved February 16, 2013, from SEAI: www.seai.ie/Publications/Statistics_Publications/Energy_in_Ireland_1990_- _2011.pdf U.S. EPA. (2008, December). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Combined Heat and Power Partnership. Retrieved Feburary 16, 2013, from U.S. EPA: www.epa.gov/chp/documents/catalog_chptect_full.pdf United Nations Framework Convention. (2011). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved November 18, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/2860 United Nations. (2012). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved Feburary 8, 2013, from United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: http://www.unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/2830.php
  • 61. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 61 8.0 Appendices Figure 19 Bord Gais Energy, Gas Bill for November 2011
  • 62. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 62 Figure 20 Energia Electricity Bill for November 2011
  • 63. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 63 Figure 21 Bord Gais Energy Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
  • 64. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 64 Figure 22 Energia Electricity Bill for December 2011 when CHP Was Out of Service
  • 65. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 65 Figure 23 CHP Plant Specifications
  • 66. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 66 Figure 24 Schematic Diagram of the CHP plant Designed by Schmitt Enertec
  • 67. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 67 Figure 25 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form
  • 68. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 68 Figure 26 ESB Networks NC5 Application Form Part 1
  • 69. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 69 Figure 27 ESB Networks Application Fees for Embedded Generators, Approved by the CER
  • 70. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 70 Figure 28 Fossil and electric building benchmarks (CIBSE guide F)
  • 71. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 71 Figure 29 SEAI comparison of energy costs (SEAI)
  • 72. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 72 Figure 30 Business electricity prices in band IC in 2011 Figure 31 CHP Name Plate
  • 73. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 73 Figure 32 CO2 emissions conversion factors by fuel type (Part L2A Building Regulations) Figure 33 CHP plant Renew able Waste Heat Bioma ss Natura l Gas LPG Oil Coal Smoke less Fuel Grid Suppli ed Electri city Grid Displa ced Electri city CO2/kWh 0 0.018 0.025 0.194 0.234 0.265 0.291 0.392 0.422 0.568 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 CO2emissions(Kg/kWh)
  • 74. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 74 Figure 34 CHP user interface Figure 35 CHP located beside the hotels main distribution board
  • 75. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 75 Figure 36 CHP water inlet Figure 37 typical service reports
  • 76. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 76 Figure 38 typical service reports Figure 39 Service report check sheet
  • 77. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 77 Figure 40 typical service reports
  • 78. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 78 Figure 41 typical service reports
  • 79. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 79 9.0 Thesis Schedule 9.1 Student-Supervisor Log Report Student-Supervisor Log Report Dates of Meetings 5/02/2013, 19/02/2013 12/03/2013, 12/03/2013, 9/04/2013, 16/04/2013, Attendees Paul Derwin and Project Supervisor Mr. Tony Kealy Items Discussed 6/02/2013 Kick off Meeting with Tony. 19/02/2013 Literature Review discussion. 12/03/2013 Meeting to discuss gas & electricity bills. 12/03/2013 Meeting to discuss CO2 emissions and efficiency of the hotel. 09/04/2013 Progress report meeting. 16/04/2013 Progress report meeting. 30/04/2013 Progress report meeting Tasks to be Completed  19/02/2013 Literature review to be completed  9/04/2013 Data collection to be completed  30/04/2013 Data analysis and Discussion of Results and conclusion to be completed Site Visit 14/02/2013 & 14/03/2013 Site Visit Tasks  14/02/2013 Author meets Kieran Maher (facilities manager), collects all relevant data on the CHP system and takes photos  14/03/2013 Author records the work done in kWh on the control interface of the CHP unit for one month.
  • 80. Paul Derwin D.I.T. Kevin St. D07114349 80 9.2 Student Log Report for Thesis Student Log Report for Thesis November 2012  Contact facilities manager in the Lyrath Estate Hotel in Kilkenny to request info on CHP, unable to help the author.  Contact facilities manager in the Burlington Hotel to request information on their CHP plant (unable to help the author, recommends the Osprey Hotel. January 2013  Contact Naas Osprey Hotel to request information on the CHP plant. Date organised for meeting.  Collection of literature information February 2013  Meeting with the facilities manager at the Osprey to collect relevant data March 2013  Deadline for the completion of the methodology and literature review sections  Deadline for data collection April 2013  30/04/2013 Data analysis and Discussion of Results and conclusion to be completed  Proof reading and editing May 2013  Format and print thesis document for binding  Prepare presentation power point for interview  May 7 2013, submission date for thesis document Signature