Cloning Argumentative Essay

Cloning Argumentative Essay
Over the last few decades Science Fiction has become an incredibly popular genre, but could you imagine something thought to be science fiction is
actually science fact? Movies like Multiplication, Star Wars Episode II: Attack Of The Clones, and, Splice all have one thing in common, Cloning!
This controversial topic was once thought to be imaginary, but has recently been pefected and many mixed opinions are developing because of it.
Scholastic Scope magazine even came out with an article called "Should You Clone Your Pet?". The way it works is, you take the embryo, a cluster
of cells, from one organism then implant that embryo in a female of the same species womb. Finally you end up with a clone of the organism that you
took the embryo of....show more content...
I think cloning a deceased pet is a terrible idea because, it seems extremely disrespectful. To me it seems like you're replacing your pet, and if you
don't mind replacing a pet with a genetic copy the original pet must not have met that much to you. If a beloved family member died would you
create a copy of them? I know I wouldn't. How would you feel if one day you die and are immediately replaced by a genetic copy of yourself.
Doesn't that take away from who you are? Every human on earth is different from each other and creating an exact replica of any living thing makes
it less like a living creature and more like something that can be mass produced in a factory. Everyone is special and I think cloning takes away from
that. Another reason I'm against cloning recreationally (cloning for your enjoyment not to cure diseases and sniff out bombs and such) is if you have a
younger child that's dog dies and you decide to clone it, doesn't that take away the perpetuity of death for this child? If someone close to this child dies
and they think they can just replace them than the shock of that being untrue will be much worst than their grief over a deceased dog. To conclude my
complicated opinion, when something/someone is dead leave it to rest! Horror movies have taught that messing with others lives (or deaths) only ends
bad for you.
In conclusion, cloning pets or animals
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Is Human Cloning Ethical?
Is Human Cloning Ethical?
Imagine that you have just been diagnosed with lung cancer. You have been told you have six months to live unless you can find two replacement
lungs. But, you are told and realize you are a clone and have to give your life to save another. Is that ethically right? Would you, the original human
want to do it? I feel that cloning human beings is ethically and morally wrong. Cloning seems to be a big issue in the world today. The issues of cloning
became a reality in 1997. On February 27, 1997, it was reported that scientist produced the first clone of an adult sheep, attracting international attention
and raising questions of whether cloning should take place. Within days, the...show more content...
The third is it impacts on societal relations. The fourth and final is the potential effects on the human gene pool. The Americans and cloning experts
just don't know the harms that will come from cloning.
Some people say limit cloning of humans to just research or for medical reasons, but it's the same thing. Producing clones for research or to use
their parts is unethical. Cloning for just medical research is still harming another human being to save another. That is wrong in my mind, ethically
and morally. Its ethically wrong because I fell that a humans morals aren't to kill other human for body parts. It's morally wrong because it's not the
right conduct of a human to do such a thing. Even if cloning is limited to medical research, there is still the risk of cloning humans. We simply
cannot play God and create life because it is ethically wrong and sinful, and most importantly, dangerous. It would be against the code of ethics of a
doctor to harm a clone. Harming a clone would be such using one of its organs to save the original life. The question shakes us all to our very souls.
For humans to consider the cloning of one another forces them all to question the very concepts of right and wrong that makes them all human. The
cloning of any species, whether they be human or non–human, is ethically wrong. The clone would be a human being and deserve

Cloning Right or Wrong? Essay
Cloning Right or Wrong? Have you ever heard of cloning before? Well it has a lot of ups and its downs, many people are against it and many are for
it? In my paper you will hear and of the good things and the bad things that happen in cloning and you can decide if you think it is right or wrong.
History
When I looked up the definition for cloning on www.m–w .com it stated that cloning is to propagate a clone from or to make a copy of. A book on
cloning that I read stated that cloning is genetically identical cells. Cloning's history is as early as 1952 and the first cell transferring was in 1970. The
cell process was not 100 percent accurate every time. Back in the 1970's many scientists struggled with trying to clone something and it...show more
content...
When people talk about cloning the bible is usually taken out on a person that is for cloning. Religion now a day has just decided to pretty much
ignore the topic and forget about it. If humans were cloned they say that there would be a huge inbreeding problem and the world will start having even
more population than what is necessary. Cloning is pretty much just a huge issue without an end; it's something that you can argue on and on about. I
looked up a chart and found one on www.religioustolerance.org about people's thoughts and what they think about cloning. The poll was taken on 1997
and consisted of 1,005 American Adults. These are the results
93% of people felt that the cloning of humans was a bad idea
66% thought that the cloning of animals, such as sheep was a bad idea
69% are scared of possibility of human cloning
74% believed that it is against God's will to clone things; while only 19% say that it is not.
A later poll was then take in 2001 by CNN and these are the results for that poll
90% of people still thought that cloning was a bad idea
67% of people that that cloning of animal was a bad idea
Only 45% of people thought that it was possible to have human cloning within the next 10 years or so.
69% of people think that it is against God's will and should not be done; 23% say that it is not.
Laws on Cloning
Only fifteen states have their own law on cloning even South Dakota. This is South Dakota's law: Prohibits

Cloning Essay
Cloning
Cloning is an unethical action that should not be tampered with physically in any animal form regardless of what it is. This is a genetically
engineered process by humans, in which, perfectly generated genes from someone or something is copied into its own life form to be an exact
replica. In the article "Calves cloned to produce drugs" there are two cows involved with cloning. People should not be tampering with this, but letting
God create people and animals the way he has it planned out to be. Not to mention, no two or more life forms should ever be exactly alike with the
exact same genes (except for plants who are that way anyhow). With this happening to animals now and evolving toward humans, it...show more
content...
No one should ever try and alter genes to any animal coming into this world, therefore in this news article, the cows should have never been cloned. In
an article in Time magazine, Richard Seed (a well educated man that graduated from Harvard)
Page 2 wanted to start up a commercial cloning clinic. As soon as that was released to public, "President Clinton blasted the idea as 'untested and
unsafe and morally unacceptable'"(Nash 58). People around the country reacted nervous and uneasy. This was an example of one person that has
the desire and knowledge to do such a thing as this. If we don't stop him now, then there will be many more doctors who will follow and set up this
idea of cloning around the world. Then the next thing you know, there will be hundreds of people identical and healthy everywhere. There is nothing
wrong with the people being healthy, but not becoming that way from cloning. Being healthy should be our job as humans to keep up with our own
body. As the article continued, Seed posed his whole idea of opening the clinic from his interest in biomedicine and discovered "a technique for
transferring embryos in cattle"(58). This is a whole new idea that cloning of animals can lead to cloning of our human race.
Seed began his work with embryos in cattle and now he has expanded his idea to form a human cloning clinic. These are the kind of people that are
going to want to go further in the cloning of

Cloning Speech : Cloning And Cloning
Prisila Monrroy
Mr Bonnet
Communications Arts
24 April 2015
Cloning speech
Suppose that every prospective parent in the world stopped having children naturally, and instead produced clones of themselves. What would the
world be like in another 20 or 30 years? The answer is: much like today.Cloning would only copy the genetic aspects of people who are already here
said by Nathan Myhrvold.
Cloning is an issue now and will be in the in the future,animals are cloned all the time.Does the human race want to have a copy of itself. We need to
understand what is happening to the cloned animals and what could possibly happen to us if we were to be cloned.
Cloning has been around for years from 1938 by Hans Spemann to 1997 when Dolly the cloned sheep was made. Why should we care that cloning is
bad? Cloning can have many complications before in the womb, during, and after. Why should we take those risks? The cost of cloning is obviously
not a what an average Joe makes.
There are three types of ways to produce a clone first one is gene cloning and that creates a copy of the genes or parts of DNA. Reproductive cloning
makes a copy of whole animals. Then Therapeutic makes embryonic stem cells. The most used is therapeutic cloning.
Some countries like Brazil are discussing if cloning can save endangered species.In 2009 the Brazilian Agricultural Research. Is freezing blood, sperm
and umbilical cord cells from animals of roadkill and some other type of

Essay about The Pros and Cons of Cloning
A clone is a cell, group of cells, or an organism that has descended from an ancestor without sexual reproduction. Humans have found cloning to be
valuable and productive. For example, Agricultural scientists use embryo cloning to boost the number of offspring from farm animals. They hope to
use cloning as to increase the number of offspring from animals with desired traits, such as lean meat or above–average milk production. Research
biologists also use the technique of cloning to study how animals develop during the early stages of life. Humans find interest in cloning because it can
be used as medical treatment, such as for couples who have difficulty conceiving a child. This problem may pardon from several conditions,...show
more content...
Researchers have only been successful in cloning using whole nuclei. Therefore, in order to clone dinosaurs, you need its nucleus, not just DNA. As
well, to find success in cloning you need an egg cell that is very closely related to the donor nucleus. But another problem is that the dinosaur eggs of
millions of years ago may have changed greatly with the eggs of modern birds and reptiles. Therefore these ancient genes might not be able to even
function properly. Another problem is that the eggs of modern reptiles and birds usually tend to be large so they cannot always be easily enucleated.
Researchers have found success in cloning amphibians but find it much more difficult when it comes to cloning mammals. One of the problems is the
fact that amphibian eggs are larger than mammal eggs. Eggs that come from mammals are also enclosed in a tough membrane, called the zona
pellucida. This tough membrane holds the cells of the young embryo together. In order to remove the nucleus, it is done through a process called
surgical aspiration, and the nucleus is sucked through a micropipette with a sharpened tip. Another problem with cloning mammals is that in order for
the fertilized eggs to develop, they need to be implanted in an adult female's uterus. As a result, a cloned embryo requires a foster mother. By 1933,
scientists had cloned five different species of mammals, which include cows, mice, pigs, rabbits, and

Cloning Essay example
Cloning
Abstract
The question to clone or not to clone is currently center stage of scientific debate. Since the birth of Dolly, the sheep, in 1997 the controversial question
of cloning has been paramount throughout the entire globe. The question is no longer whether it can be done, but whether is should be done and to
what extent. We have already cloned goats, mice, monkeys, cattle, and pigs (Cloning fact sheet). Scientists are now trying to get approval to clone
humans or at least parts of them (Eccleston, CNN). All of these clonings have led to much criticism and controversy, but the latest attempt at cloning is
that of endangered and possibly already extinct species in hopes of preserving them. This short paper...show more content...
In the case of this next example, 692 embryos were cloned, of those only 81 grew sufficiently to implant, of those 42 were implanted into 32 cows,
but only eight cows actually became pregnant (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). Most of the cows had spontaneous abortions and one had a
very late–term abortion. These low statistics led to only one cow making it to full term so far (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000).
What does this have to do with endangered species?
Next month, November 2000, the first cloned, endangered species is scheduled to be born. Noah, as he has already been named, is a gaur: a large
ox–like animal from India with a current population of only about 36,000 left in the wild (Lanza, R., Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). The reasoning
behind cloning endangered species according to scientists at Advanced Cell Technology (ACT), is ultimately the preservation of their gene pool and
propagation of these animals until their natural habitats can be restored, at which point they could be reintroduced back into the wild (Lanza, R.,
Dresser, B., Damiani, P. 2000). The interesting thing about what scientists at ACT are doing, is that they are not cloning the genes of one species and
introducing them into the same species, they are transferring the gene carrying eggs into another species entirely. Noah, the gaur, will be brought into
this world

Human Cloning Essay
Imagine a future where humans are manufactured, a future where humans are created by science, a future where humans are the new lab specimen.
Human cloning is like opening Pandora's Box, unleashing a torrent of potential evils but at the same time bringing a small seed of hope. No matter
how many potential medical and scientific benefits could be made possible by human cloning, it is unethical to clone humans. Before the ethics of
human cloning can be discussed, the mechanics of cloning must be understood first. Cloning is the process of making an exact genetic copy of an
organism by a method called nuclear transplantation which is a process of removing a nucleus (the center of a cell which contains all of the biological
information)...show more content...
Human cloning is not always copying and creating a full organism; that is reproductive cloning. Cloning just an organ or tissue is called therapeutic
cloning, and is a technology that is not possible yet but scientists feel that it is only a matter of time (Tierney). With that technology, many patients
could be cured of previously life–long conditions such as paralysis, chronic heart attacks, and leukemia. A long–term "disease" such as infertility could
be cured as well by creating a clone of the female and then transplanting that clone's eggs into the female and then the children the couple has will be
their biological children! Even amputees could have limbs regenerated in a lab and reattached (Smith). These medical advances seem like a cure–all,
but they are not possible at the moment because we do not know enough about the human genome to see which genes code for certain proteins which
shape the function of the cell. With our current technology, we cannot direct a cell to specialize into a kidney cell to transplant into a patient needing
a new kidney. Current technology doesn't allow for the creation of "spare parts" but it is possible to create fully functional humans (after many
attempts), and then the human that was "created" could then be grown and disemboweled for "spare parts" (Dudley 30). The idea of creating a
"Caliban" or a human specifically to act

Cloning Essay
Cloning
For hundreds of years man has wondered what it would be like to clone human beings. With the idea of cloning comes many different opinions and
positions. The idea of creating an army of "super humans" has long been a dream of many people. Others have feared what would happen to the world if
cloning were possible and if cloning is morally correct. Overall, religion and ethics play a vital role in the both of these viewpoints and greatly effect
many positions on the topic of cloning. In February of 1997 Dr. Ian Wilmut, a 52–year–old embryologist at the Roslin Institute in dinburgh announced
the cloning of a lamb named Dolly 1. He had replaced the genetic material of sheep's egg with the DNA...show more content...
Many individuals also stated that now that the technology is available, its use is inevitable. Randolfe Wicker, a New York businessperson, founded
the Clone Rights United Front after reports of the successful cloning. His goals are to continue to push for more research and to defend people's
rights.3 These examples show the rights of the individual, but ironically many people who fight for the rights of individuals, form groups to do so. In
his Tuesday, February 25, 1997 article 'Should We Fear Dolly?' James K. Glassman, a writer for the Washington post discusses his favorable views on
cloning. He points out that cloning is something that could someday be used for treatment to cure human diseases, and the ability to produce organs for
transplanting as benefits for all of society. Also, he points out that while cloning people is against the law in other countries, it is not in the United
States. He said, "I don't think it should be –– certainly not at this stage . . . Trying to stop intellectual progress, in any form, is a terrible mistake.
Furthermore, the technology is not, in principle, policeable. In other words, you couldn't really stop research on human cloning if you wanted to." 4
Most of the scientific community favors the cloning of animals. Many, including Dr. Wilmut, argue that the potential for medical and

Cloning Essay examples
Cloning
Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists
have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep.Cloning has
brought up a huge controversy among the American people. There are two sides to the story. Either you agree with cloning or you don't. The only
way to help make that decision is to look at the good and bad points of cloning. There are many positive aspects of human and non–human cloning.
Human cloning technology could be used to reverse the number one killer in the United States, heart attacks. Scientists believe that they...show more
content...
By combining this technology with human cloning technology it may be possible to produce needed tissue for suffering people that will be free
of rejection by their immune systems. Conditions such as Alzheimer's disease Parkinson's disease, diabetes, heart failure, and other problems may
be made curable by human cloning. ("Cloning to Save Lives") Now there are also some ways that we are playing god through cloning. For
example, infertile parents could easily have a baby cloned using their DNA and women that are at high risk for Down's syndrome can avoid that
risk by cloning. Even though this sounds great we are basically changing reproduction, as we have always known it to be. There are also many
negative aspects of cloning. To create different organs or limbs in order to help a person to live longer or more comfortably seems to go against
nature. The way human life should be created is through sexual intercourse. Harmond Varmus, a schoolteacher, said it best; "Human cloning
represents a grave attack on the dignity of conception and on the right an unrepeatable, unpredetermined set of genes." To clone an animal is almost
the same thing. We are playing with the way humans and animals have reproduced for years. Is it fair that we clone and then kill an animal just for its
organs in order to save a person's life? Scientists are not even sure that the animal's organs will be compatible with the human body. According to the
Medical Research

Argumentative Essay On Human Cloning
Human Cloning
While we have the state of the art technologies and the result of a successful cloning of the infamous lamb known as Dolly, should we take the next
step and begin human cloning? If I were to carry the super DNA that scientists are wanting to explore in the lab, would I allow myself to be
duplicated? Absolutely not! Replicating a human is not only wrong on ethical grounds but also a threat to our existence! The biggest concern is how far
will humans attempt to control nature? Therefore, I do not believe that cloning should be allowed based on my teleological outlook.
Diversity diminishes, and the human population decreases. It shifts the process of natural evolution. For hundreds of generations, our ancestors
developed through a gradual process of changes from their ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. By hindering this process our specie will
suffer. The negative outcomes are far greater than the positives. Maybe cloning can and will allow for possible answers for diseases and cures,
however it still interferes with the natural order of life; the human life–cycle. We must put into consideration the time and money spent on the
experiment with the cloned lamb. After years of several failed attempts prior to creating Dolly, can we, as humans, walk with a clean conscious
knowing the amount of safety and harm caused toward a developing child–clone and those involved in the process (DNA holder, scientists, etc.)? This
paints a clear picture of how cloning a human will be far more difficult, dangerous, and unethical. As a mother, I strongly oppose of this idea due to
the consequences of how we, as a society will view these cloners, and how these cloners will affect my children's lives. Will my children lead a normal
life if they are deemed having a weak and undesirable DNA? Undoubtedly, a loss of individuality and diversity is created. Our genetic make–up is
what makes us unique. It gives an individual a sense of self and distinctiveness. Eventually, the population starts to lack uniqueness. Two people
wouldn't be sitting down having a conversation on their diverse backgrounds, rather everyone else will have almost the same thoughts and ideas. How
can a society grow and learn about all the

Cloning Essay
Many have imagined what it would be like to have a clone of themselves.
Many have also feared the thought of having a clone. Due to popular belief that a clone
would be an exact duplicate. An incorrect presumption made by many. Proceeding along
side is the religious beliefs and the controversial ethicality and morality aspects of human
cloning. A stance taken by many religions and their congregations. In reality the public has
a very narrow sense of what human cloning is. Rather than research and understand the
scientific aspect of human cloning, they instead take faith in what the media and movies
portray human cloning to be. It is from this information source that a majority base their
decision on weather...show more content...
Presenting the idea of a rogue government creating
an army of elite clone soldiers or to create a totalitarian society. Silver concludes that this
scenario is of low probability due the fact that it would require that cooperation of many
women in order to birth to these soldier or totalitarian clones. Silvers article is agreeable
considering the fact that many people believe what they see in the media and movies, many

are not willing to research the subject of cloning to find out what it is. Instead they let the
media and movies decide weather cloning is right or wrong. In actuality seventy percent of
the time the media and movies are bias, only showing one aspect of human cloning.
Which unfortunately happens to be the negative aspect, because it makes the most money
in television and movie ratings. Then there is the claim made by many that human clones
are soulless vessels which is completely incorrect. Once taken into consideration the
human cloning process is quite similar to that of invitro fertilization, both take place
outside of the females body and both embryos are then placed into the mother where they
are conceived, within nine months a child is born just like any other child. Since cloning
brings up the possibility of clone armies or totalitarian cloned states created by rogue
Governments, it should be pointed out that these scenarios are highly unlikely.
Considering that a government would

Cloning Is The Cloning Of Cloning
Introduction In biology, a "clone" simply means that an object, cell, or whole organism has the same genetic makeup as the original object, cell, or
organism. Cloning means an organism is generated genetically identical from an existing organism through non–sexual means. Cloning simply means
to make an identical duplication of genes, fragments of DNA molecules, organs, or cells. There are three different types of artificial cloning. They
include gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning. Gene cloning produces copies of gene segments of DNA. Reproductive cloning
produces copies of whole animals. Therapeutic cloning is another word for Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) and is the cloning of human
embryo for research. Animals, plants, and Humans can all be cloned.
One of the most important breakthrough's in the history of cloning was the cloning of Dolly. Ian Wilmut and Kieth Cambell cloned the first animal
from adult cells. On July 5, 1996 Dolly the sheep was born using the Roslin Technique. It took a total of two–hundred and seventy–seven attempts to
clone Dolly before the clone was finally made in perfection. This experiment proved that it was possible for adult animals to be cloned. Dolly was
cloned from the mammary gland cell of an adult animal. For the mammary cell to develop into a fetus, an egg was still required. Instead of the egg
contributing to the genetic makeup of the Dolly it was only the mammary gland. The cloning of Dolly involved a

Cloning Essay
Should Human Cloning be Legal?
Cloning captured the public's attention when Scottish scientists startled the world in July of 1996 when they announced the birth of a sheep named
Dolly which they had cloned from the nucleus of an adult mammary cell and a sheep egg. Ever since this spectacular event occurred people have been
thinking about the possibility of cloning humans. What would a clone be like? His/her physical appearance would be the same as the person he/she was
cloned from, but depending on the society it would be brought up in it's personality would be totally different. Many people in this decade believe
...show more content...
Why clone human embryos? There are many legitimate reasons for investigating cloning. Embryologists believe that the research could help improve
the lives of further generations. "Cancer research is possibly the most important reason for embryo cloning. Oncologists believe that embryonic study
will advance the understanding of the rapid growth of cancer cells. Cancer cells develop at approximately the same phenomenal rate as the embryonic
cells do. By studying the embryonic cell growth, scientists may be able to determine how to stop it, and also stop cancer growth in turn (Watson 66)."
Another important reason for embryo cloning is to remove genetic diseases out of the embryo's DNA and replace it with regular DNA, but this
procedure is only theoretical. This is another reason cloning should be allowed to find out if this procedure is possible. "Also, doctors hope that by
being able to study the multiple embryos developed through cloning, they can determine what causes spontaneous abortions. Contraceptive specialists
also believe that if they can determine how an embryo knows where to implant itself, then they can develop a contraceptive that would prevent
embryos from implanting in the uterus (Watson 66)." One questionable procedure is cloning an embryo to use the bone marrow of the clone for a
critically sick child. these are many

Cloning Essay
Cloning
In recent years, the issue of cloning has been up for debate worldwide. Cloning is the production of one or more individual plants or animals that are
genetically identical to another plant or animal. There are two different types of cloning procedures, embryo cloning and adult DNAcloning. Embryo
cloning occurs when sperm and egg cells are mixed in a glass dish. After conception, the zygote (fertilized egg) is allowed to divide and nutrients are
added to promote cell division. The cells then fuse with an ovum which has the nucleus removed. Adult DNA cloning is taking cells from mammary
tissue from an adult. Cloning can have many good results to help humans, but others argue that it is wrong because it is immoral....show more content...
Scientists are researching by splitting embryos to execute experiments to find data relating to cell differentiation, the use of stem cells, and genetic
screening. Fertility clinics use this service to help couples when a mother or father has a genetic disorder. A fertility clinic will clone an embryo, then
test it for genetic disorders. If the embryo is tested negative for genetic disorders, then the fertility clinic implants a clone of that embryo. This should
guarantee that the child would not have any genetic disorders.
I view cloning with mixed feelings, but I agree strongly with cloning being right. I do not believe that cloning humans to make more humans is
right, but I do think cloning human organs to replace a defective gene is right. In England, scientists are heavily researching the embryo for stem
cells. Right now the British scientists can use early embryos to study specific problems such as infertility, congenital diseases, contraception and
prenatal diagnostics. Cloning good stem cells and using them for babies with these problems would prevent the diseases from ever happening. The
reason for using the stem cell is because the cell is so versatile. Stem cells are taken from human embryos and fetal tissue. The cell, when never used,
like in embryos, can be turned into nearly any cell type of the whole body. Scientists also expect that when using cloned embryos a person would
easily overcome the problem of

Animal Cloning Essay
Final Essay: Multiple Sources, Research Based Argumentative Essay
Animal Cloning: Beneficial to Humans
Today's technology develops so quickly that many impossible things become true; the example is cloning technology. Cloning is a process used to
create an exact copy of a mammal by using the complete genetic material of a regular body cell. Different from the common propagate, cloning needs
only one cell and without sex. Cloning, as of recent years, has become a very controversial issue in society but cloning can have several positive
effects for the well being of society. Many people in society believe that scientists should develop a clone human but many people and especially the
government are against human cloning. Hundreds of...show more content...
Farmers are using different technology for breeding. They used selective breeding to produce animals that exhibit desirable traits and they get more
benefit from it. For example, using breeding techniques farmers makes cows which produce more milk with less lactose, and sheep which produce
more wool. Farmers accept this new selective breeding technology because in the past, farmers would use growth hormones to promote such
qualities. This became problematic when residue of the hormones remained in the meat, leaving it with a foul taste. When researchers began to clone
transgenic animals, it became possible to develop certain traits in animals, which increased the quality of their yield. When a farmer would like to
raise the standards of a herd, the breeding process is very slow and sometimes incomes can decrease (Wilmut 23). Many times when relying on sexual
breeding alone to mass–produce these animals, there are chances of breeding out the desired traits (Freudenrich). Transgenic animal cloning will result
in higher quality meats and dairies without the use of artificial hormones. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration released in January 2008 concluded
"edible products from normal, healthy clones or their progeny do not appear to pose increased food consumption risks relative to comparable products
from conventional animals." After 2008, US Food and Drug Administrative agree to use

Persuasive Essay On Cloning
The thought of cloning human beings can be exciting for some but scary for others. Some people find cloning to be one the most spectacular
invention while others think it is not a great idea to clone themselves. Another issue here is that some people feel that we if we are cloning human
beings, we will be taking the role of God. What exactly does this means? Well, people who have a religious background feel that this can be stepping
out of religion boundaries because it's scientists that will be involved in the process instead of God and this is not done naturally. People have viewed
cloning is just making another human being but what about artificial insemination? "Artificial insemination have been used to create children who
would not have existed without help or interference of modern science"...show more content...
But without this method a lot of women and men will not be able to have a family because of medical issues. Just like anything else that is unnatural
such as antibiotics, vaccinations, surgery, hair dye, people who are not against it feel that those who are should object to these things. Most people
think that we don't know how our child will turn out and what qualities they will have. But this is not so true anymore. Those who are creating a
child through sexual intercourse can actually find out now certain qualities of their future children. And with the IVF technology, it makes it possible
which embryo to implant after the DNA analysis is performed. "It is even possible, with preimplantation diagnosis (PID) to implant one identical
twin and freeze the other future use" (Anderson). We also are not able to predict everything that will happen with the person that is created.
Predictions can be made but it is not possible to know exactly what will happen. There was a poll that was taken by CNN, about 7% Americans
wanted to cloned. Therefore, there are people still not agreeing with

Cloning Essay
Shortly after the announcement that British scientists had successfully cloned a sheep, Dolly, cloning humans has recently become a possibility that
seems much more feasible in today's society. The word clone has been applied to cells as well as to organisms, so that a group of cells stemming
from a single cell is also called a clone. Usually the members of a clone are identical in their inherited characteristics that is, in their genes except for
any differences caused by mutation. Identical twins, for example, who originate by the division of a single fertilized egg, are members of a clone;
whereas nonidentical twins, who derive from two separate fertilized eggs, are not clones. (MicrosoftВ® EncartaВ® 97 Encyclopedia). There are two
...show more content...
There Dr. Jerry Hall experimented with the possibility of human cloning and began this moral and ethical debate. There it was concluded that cloning
is not something that can be done as of now, but it is quite a possibility for the future. Thesescientists experimented eagerly in aims of learning how to
clone humans. Ruth Macklin of U.S. News & World Report writes, "Hall and other scientists split single humans embryos into identical
copies, a technology that opens a Pandora's box of ethical questions and has sparked a storm of controversy around the world" (http:/
/www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/). They attempted to create seventeen human embryos in a laboratory dish and when it had grown enough, separated
them into forty–eight individual cells. Two of the separated cells survived for a few days in the lab developed into new human embryos smaller than
the head of a pin and consisting of thirty–two cells each. (http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/) Although we cannot clone a human yet, this
experiment occurred almost two years ago and triggered almost an ethical emergency. Evidence from these experiments received strange reactions from
the public. Ruth Macklin states, "Cloning is a radical challenge to the most fundamental laws of biology, so it's not unreasonable to be concerned
that it might threaten human society and dignity. Yet much of the ethical

Benefits of Cloning Essay examples
Cloning is the process of making a genetically identical organism through the use of a DNA sample. After the first cloned sheep dolly was created,
many people were keen in knowing more about cloning and its benefit to society. Additionally, many of us want to know the pros and con the
disadvantages and possible risks it may have on society and mankind. Most importantly, there are three types of cloning, therapeutic, reproductive, and
embryonic cloning. These types of cloning are all ways of scientists trying to find ways to produce a living organism or organs.
Undoubtedly, cloning is a topic that raises many question when brought up within society. However we can't dismiss the fact that the process could
benefit the lives of human...show more content...
This is a form of therapeutic cloning in which scientists use embryo to grow human organs. Most importantly, it could be used to improve the quantity
and quality of our foods products. However, this form of cloning is actually destroying our human embryos, which initially causes many to wonder
whether this idea of cloning id worth it in the end.
Recently, there has been the idea of scientists trying to clone animals for food. Although products from cloned animals are more likely to be safe,
we still have to do a more comprehensive study to examine the safety of the foods. Mellon (2006) argued that "If consumers aren't going to be told if
their meat is from a clone, FDA has to be certain that meat is safe (para.2)". It's important that consumers know what is entering their body because if
the cloned products causes the consumer to get sick, then the consumer have the right to take any legal action against the FDA. In addition, just
because a cloned organism may appear normal, doesn't mean that it may not have any genetic defect; cause most of the time many cloned organisms
always seem to have a genetic defect that causes them to die at an early age.
Unquestionably, cloning is a good way for scientists to find new developing cells or genetically transform an organism. However, it could have an
enormous impact within our society. Many scientists are now starting to realize that cloning could lead to psychological harm upon

Cloning Argumentative Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Cloning Argumentative Essay