Effects Of Banning Smoking Advertising Essay

Effects of Banning Smoking Advertising Essay
Effects of Banning Smoking Advertising
Cigarettes are some of the most abused drugs in the world and the effects associated with smoking have greatly influenced the intervention of health
professionals concerning the legality of smoking advertisements. Ethical and legal issues have come up over the essence of restricting or completely
banning cigarette advertising to reduce the number of affected individuals. Cigarettes have since time immemorial been established to cause a wide
range of infections and diseases. The most common disease caused by cigarettes is cancer and since the drug affects smokers and non–smokers as well,
there has been a widespread call to illegalize cigarette advertising.
The rationale behind banning cigarette...show more content...
With a reduction in cigarette demand, the farmers would be subjected to low prices because the supply in such cases would exceed the demand.
The other group that would be affected by a ban on cigarette advertising would be the cigarette manufacturing companies. The negative effects that can
be experienced by these companies in case of such a ban are direct. These companies could lower their productivity and sales in case of such a ban and
this could adversely affect their earnings. Once the advertisements are banned, there would be less new smokers as compared to when the adverts are
operational (Cohen, Shumate, and Gold 93). This means that advertisements on cigarettes mostly affect and influence new smokers than they do to
practicing smokers. For this reason, most of the smokers are influenced to remain indulging in the practice due to addiction and not the advertisements.
Banning of cigarette smoking would greatly affect the government's revenue that is collected from different sectors. Farmers are some of the
individuals who are directly and indirectly taxed for producing tobacco and if their productivity was to drop, the government would receive reduced
revenue and this would affect its spending power and the national budget as well. The adverts should be allowed to run without any ban to ensure that
all the stakeholders benefit in terms of profits, productivity and revenues.
The effects
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

The Controversy Of Banning Smoking In Public
As he is pulling out his lighter and lighting the cigarette. There is a little boy sitting at the table next to him. The man just say to himself " It's ok to
smoke if everyone else is." As the littler boy breathes in th3e smoke not only the smoke is unhealthy but the smoke is also increasing the chance for
the little boy to have cancer. How would you react if that boy was your son? This brings up the debate on banningsmoking in public. There are many
pros and cons of banning smoking in public. Here are a few of the pros. Smoking in public reduce the risk of second hand smoking which is worse
than actually smoking. They will work more peacefully and more productive because that "nasty" smoke smell isn't all over the place.

Ohio Banning Smoking
In November of 2006 Ohio put a ban on smoking cigarettes in all public places. The ban was put in place to protect people from the effects of
second hand smoke. Some of these effects include, heart disease, cancer and other dangerous diseases. Ohio was the first tobacco growing state that
implemented this kind of ban. According to the Ohio Department of Health's website, about 280,000 public places and places of employment were
affected by this ban and no longer would they be exposed to second hand smoke.
Debate.org says that, "79% of people were for the ban and 21% of people were against the ban". Some comments that were left on this website
regarding the ban include, "smoking harms everyone, including children" and "it is so unhealthy,...show more content...
For the business, the first offence is a warning and a $100 fine. The second time is a $500 fine and the third time is a $1,000 fine. Each time the fine
will double and more actions will be put in place. For an individual, the first offence is a $100 fine, double each time from there. If this becomes a
recurring problem then law enforcement will step in with a different punishment for the individual.
I'm sure that most people have seen the sign for "no smoking" in most, if not all, public places. This is because it is a law for public places in Ohio.
The signs must be posted at every entrance in the building and be a certain size and be very clear. Not only does the sign have a picture of a cigarette
with a slash through it, but the sign must also contain a toll–free number for customers to call to report violators.
In my opinion the ban was a very smart idea and every state should have it in place. It is proven that smoking and even second–hand smoking can be
dangerous and put your health in jeopardy. As a non–smoker, the smell of cigarette smoke is very strong and unappealing, especially when eating a
meal. If Ohio did not have this law in place then I most likely would not go out to eat as much as I do. I would try to do take out or at least ask to be
seated in the non–smoking

Argumentative Essay: Should Tobacco Be Banned?
Argumentative Essay: Should Tobacco Be Banned?
Abdullah Al–Bannai ENGL 110–52
Mr. Rafe Zaabalawi
Summer II
August 2015
Should Tobacco Be Banned by the Government?
According to the existing statistics, the greatest proportion of the world's population does not smoke tobacco. As noted in the United States of America,
only one out of four adults smoke. Tobacco product use can be grouped as one of the social problems that has brought detrimental health concerns on
the long time. It has also been established that that most people start smoking at the age between 12 and 14 years old (Eaton, 2003). Despite being of
great economic importance, tobacco has brought about much more harm than good. In fact, those who smoke have their life span shortened...show more
content...
Use of tobacco has been associated with the cause of diseases that ultimately cause deaths. About 1,200 tobacco smokers die every month from
smoking. This translates to about 1,4389,00 suffering patinas every year (Harper, 2006). This is a great number of preventable deaths every year.
Those who survive the tobacco–induced deaths live with lifelong problems that include pulmonary diseases, cancers and the discoloration of the teeth.
In addition, smokers have high risks of getting heart attacks and many other conditions that tend to make life quite uncomfortable. Burning tobacco
leads to the production of a wide variety of chemicals. So far, it has been noted that tobacco has over 700 chemical compounds. The chemicals in
tobacco belong to different groups which include humectants, pesticides, heavy metals, casting agents and many more. The most common chemical
compounds in tobacco include tar, nicotine, and carbon. All these chemicals have negative effects on human health. Tar, for example, brings about many
detrimental effects to human being (Szilagyi, 2002). First, there is the main cause of the respiratory

The Debate Over Banning Smoking in Public Places
In my opinion I think smoking should banned from public places. My reasons for this are;
People who smoke should be considerate of that fact that not only are they damaging their own existing health but also they are harming the others
around them who are only breathing in the tobacco smoke.
During the past ten years of tests, experiments etc. on the effect of smoking both directly and passive, there is now enough scientific evidence to prove
that exposure to second–hand smoke both harms health, and worsens existing health problems and at least one thousand people are estimated to die
each year in the UK as the result of exposure to other...show more content...
Out of the 4,000 chemicals there are in the smoke these three have a very large affect on the body. The tar is what coats the lining of the lungs
making them less able to take in oxygen; it also contains carcinogens, which is the fundamental cause of cancer. The Carbon Monoxide is a poisoness
gas that joins up with the red blood cells making them incapable of transporting oxygen around the body. And lastly theNicotine is the addictive drug
which raises the heart beat, narrows the arteries causing high blood pressure, which in most cases leads to heart disease. Already these three
chemicals have a vast affect on the health of any person. So if people do smoke and have to then why should those that don't smoke have to be
affected as well by these toxic chemicals?
Smokers aren't always aware of what damage they are doing both to themselves and the others around them. Is it fair to bring up children around in a
smoking environment? Well in some cases this is inevitable. Parents who smoke may be strongly addicted and may have tried giving up already,
might not be able to help bringing their children up in a smoke filled environment, however it is extremely unfair that a young person who is healthy
and very able at sport for example should be affected by having to breathe in their parents cigarette smoke, and risk the

Smoking Should Be Banned Essay
Ban Smoking in Public Places Smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable deaths in the United States, and doing it in public is even worse
because smokers not only harm themselves, but also those around them. I remember how my great uncle would always smoke in his house regardless
of his surroundings. When his daughter visited him for a vacation, she brought her three year old daughter with her. The baby was healthy before
coming to her grandpa's house, but in less than two weeks, she had developed ear infections and started to cough. When they went to the doctors' office
to find out how she had gotten it, the doctor linked it back to the second hand smoke that she was breathing in. When my great uncle found out about it,
he...show more content...
According to Tree Hugger, cigarette butts have been found inside the stomachs of birds and fishes (McLaren). It is horrible to know that some of the
fishes that we have eaten may have been contaminated by cigarette butts. Though many smokers already know of the health risks that come with
smoking cigarettes, but what most of them do not, is how secondhand smoking can affect other people. "Breathing in low doses of secondhand
smoke can increase a person's risk of heart attack" according to a study by Dr. Meyers, a professor of Cardiology and Preventive Medicine at
University of Kansas (Sciencedaily.com). Smokers should not risk non–smokers for something that they do. In continuation of Dr. Meyers' study is
that, "secondhand smoking increases the likelihood of a heart attack by making the blood "sticky", making it more prone to clotting, and reducing the
amount of good cholesterol in the body" (Sciencedaily.com). Non–smokers should not be worrying about paying more medical bills, especially in
today's economic situation. Many businesses provide health insurance to their employees. According to a statistical data collected by Live Strong,
employers spend an extra $49 million in medical costs for employees who are exposed to secondhand smoking in their jobs (Nelson). Employers
would be able to hire more people with the money that is being used to pay for medical bills that could be prevented. Smoking banned in

Banning Cigarettes Essay
Each year, the U.S. government passes numerous laws to protect its citizens. Yet, one perfectly legal product manages to seize over 400,000 American
lives annually (American Lung Association, "American"). Despite the efforts of the U.S. government to protect its citizens, the
government continues to ignore the single most preventable cause of premature deaths. The vicious culprit attributed to these deaths is the common
cigarette. Death, however, is not the only transgression cigarettes are responsible for. Cigarettes pose a clear threat to the public, to the economy, and to
the planet. Without a doubt, the government should ban cigarettes on account of the fact that they are harmful to the economy, to the body, and to the
...show more content...
Another area where cigarette smoking is costly is the working environment. Employers must spend more money on smokers than on nonsmokers.
Statistics indicate, in fact, that smokers do not attend work as often, receive more health insurance, show reduced job performance, and require higher
maintenance expenses (Tobacco). Lastly, and most obviously, smokers themselves can save money by not buying cigarettes. Simply put, cigarettes are
stifling to economic growth. Cigarettes are not only harmful to the economy but also harmful to the body.
Undeniably, the government should outlaw cigarettes because they are harmful to the body. First of all, cigarettes contain nicotine, "an addictive
drug, which when inhaled in cigarette smoke reaches the brain faster than drugs that enter the body intravenously" (American Lung Association,
"American"). Secondly, cigarettes contain numerous chemicals and poisons such as ammonia, arsenic, carbon monoxide, and
formaldehyde. Some of these chemicals even cause cancer. Besides harmful effects on smokers, they also have unpleasant effects on nonsmokers.
Nonsmokers often breathe in the smoke from burning cigarettes, whether they want to or not. Thus, nonsmokers suffer some of the same ailments as
smokers. Another party subject to the dangers of cigarette smoke includes unborn and newborn children. Women who choose to smoke during their
pregnancy often put their child at risk of many defects.

Banning The Issue Of Banning Cigarettes
In order to preserve life, certain laws and regulations are placed to maintain harmony among people, to protect against any harmful behavior which
might impose preventable diseases and death, and also to act as an awareness and respect for others. In that regard, what are considered public places
in state laws in reference to smoking is very much debatable. It is our duty as individuals to exercise certain behaviors that will benefit others,
regardless of life circumstances and serve our society in the most respectable manner, in accordance to people rights and choices.
Since the nineties, there has been a massive controversy on the issue of banning cigarettes in the U.S. Some claim that banning public smoking is an
infringement on their...show more content...
Moreover, the correlation to heart diseases and lung cancer from tobacco smoke is illegitimate. Bast quotes the British Medical Journal, "the results do
not support a causal relation between environmental tobacco smoke and tobacco–related mortality" (Bast). Some are mainly concerned with those who
work in the tobacco and cigarette business. Most families, especially those in Africa, survive from framing tobacco, which is one of their biggest
exports and income. The resultant of banning public smoking will in the long run deter the economy and lead to unemployment. According to one
study, "the number of pubs closing per week in Britain doubled after a 2007 smoking ban" (Matthews) and the worst scenario is the closure of tobacco
companies if the law is enforced.
However, the law doesn't prohibit people from smoking, but it protects others from the harmful substances they are exposed to. It's true that the law
might be an infringement on freedom, but there are also laws that ban public drinking to prevent harm that it exerts on others. Thus, banning smoking
in none the less in comparison to those laws. Philosopher, John Stuart stated in 1859, "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised
over any member of a civilized community, against his will is

The Advantages of Banning Public Cigarette Smoking
For a long time now many people have different views about smoking in public places. Smokers feel it is their right to smoke where and when they
want. On the other hand non–smokers feel smokers violate their rights and endanger their life. Smoking causes heart disease, lung cancer and other
serious illnesses. Cigarette smoking is the number one cause of lung cancer. A substantial number of lung cancers that occur in non–smokers can be
attributed to involuntary smoking. There are some parts in the United
States where you can smoke in public places, on the other hand in New York there are designated areas. While some people feel that smoking in public
places should...show more content...
A U.S enviromental protection agency stated second–hand smoke is the third major cause of lung cancer in the United States. The simple separation of
smokers within the same air space may reduce, but does not eliminate exposure to passive smoke. In
Arizona five thousand and six hundred Americans died in 1989 due to passive smoke. A recent federal Environmental protection agency reported on
the dangers of second hand smoke. They found this kills fifty–three thousand non smokers a year. By putting a smoke free policy into effect, it will
send a strong message about protecting health. Even though designated areas are set aside for smokers this does not really protect a non–smoker. The
heating and air conditions does not filter out carcinogens well enough and the smoke drifts onto non–designated areas.
Finally, if public smoking is kept legalized we will have major problems facing the environment. One problem is alot of people are irritated by
tobacco smoke. A man named General C.Everett Knoop released a report saying that passive smoking, when a non–smokers breathe smoke in an
enclosed area, it causes as many as five deaths a year. Smoking in a public place is an air pollutant and it can damage health in a number of ways.
The four major health hazards fall into air, water, and noise pollution. Air pollution can lead to various forms of respiratory disease. The main problem
of smoking in a public

The Debate of Banning Smoking in Public Places
"There is no difference between a smoker and a suicide, only that one takes longer to kill themselves than the other".
Everyone has their rights, and if you want to smoke or not should be your choice because you are doing the damage to your own body. But if it's
supposed to be your choice and every gets their own choice then when you smoke in public places or wherever anyone is around you, you are making
that choice for them and damaging their body not just yours. Is this unfair? Throughout this essay I will discuss the pros and cons of smoking and
smoking in public places and discuss how smoking affects you and others around you.
Most people...show more content...
Also a great deal of smoker complain of 'smokers cough'. This is due to our bodies way of trying to get rid of the tar that has settled in the bronchial
tubes, by producing extra mucus to clean the lungs. So if smoking is proved to cause all these health hazards and repulsive things then why do people,
including the young, smoke?
Tobacco first arrived in the 16th century, and many Europeans started to smoke as they believed tobacco contained medicine, which was good for
their health. Today it is well known that the opposite is true and the reason so many people may hate smoking but cant give up is because cigarettes
contain a chemical called nicotine. Nicotine gives a person many good feelings, these feelings you get are what draw you back for another cigarette.
Nicotine causes rapid relief of adrenaline which feels good and it's effects are:
* Rapid heartbeat
* Increased blood pressure
* Rapid, shallow breathing
It also makes you eat less and some people find this a good thing but it is definitely not. It causes you to think that you have no sugar unlike the weight
loss caused by exercising, this makes you have high cholesterol and damages arteries this causes heart attacks. Nicotine is why its tremendously hard to

give up smoking.
So just because smoking is so addictive and smokers cant give up why

Smoking Ban Persuasive Essay
BACKGROUND INFORMATION For several decades, smoking remains one of the most common and most unhealthy of human habits. Smoking,
specifically in public, had generally been regarded as a personal choice that bystanders had little control over. Now for the first time, the act of public
smoking is becoming regulated, even restricted in many cities worldwide. The city of Columbia has recently implemented a ban on smoking in efforts
to reduce the negative effects of smoking on employees and customers of restaurants and bars. The issue is that smoke directly affects everyone in the
vicinity of a public place, restaurant or bar. Based on the evidence that a ban on smoking prevents secondhand smoke, deters the unhealthy habit of
smoking, does...show more content...
A study in El Paso, Texas, proved that a smoking ban did not affect business. By comparing revenues from restaurants, bars, and retail establishments
twelve years before and one year after the smoking ban was passed, the results of the study showed that there was no statistical difference in revenue
(Huang). Another similar study conducted in New York City, New York, showed that businesses were not only unaffected by the smoking ban but
eventually thrived, as tax receipts increased eight point seven percent. In addition, employment in restaurants and bars increased by 10,600 jobs in
New York since the smoking ban began ("The State"). Thus, the claim of business in Columbia negatively affected from the smoking ban is
inaccurate. Many critics claim that a smoking ban harms business in Columbia, because a few restaurants and bars have closed since the ban was in
enacted. However they have failed to supply viable evidence that a smoking ban negatively affects business, forgetting to count for others factors such
as bad food, location, and poor business decisions by owners. Besides not affecting business, a smoking ban deters smoking in general. With the ban in
place it allows those who want to quit smoking the incentive to quit. A contributing factor to this is inhalingtobacco actually increases the number of
receptors in the brain that crave nicotine. So, if there is no smoke being inhaled people

Banning Cigarettes
Not only was smoking seen as a nuisance, but the act could land a person jobless as well. The New York Times released an article in 1907 reporting
the decline in businesses hiring smokers. By 1909, twelve states engaged in the temperance movement, also banned cigarettes. With a growing desire
for a clean society, the public labeled cigarettes as a nuisance that must be banned

The Controversy Of Banning Cigarette Smoking
Proposed bills are being passed around in many different states to ban the use of cigarette smoking. Banning the controlled substance, nicotine, will
put people in jail or up to a 6,250 fine if they continue to use the drug. Even though banning cigarette smoking will be hard to do, many civilians
argue a good reason to ban the drug is because of all the lives that tobacco takes. Many places and manufacture companies have already banned and
discourage tobacco use on their property due to the dangerous effects tobacco causes. The effects are smoking are very hazardous and causes many
diseases. Clinical directors and Health Initiative Programs explain the causes and effects cigarette smoking causes. The ultimate goal is to have the
world free

Ban of Public Smoking Essay
According the Virginia Department of Health, one in every five deaths may be attributed to smoking and exposure to secondhand smoke (Smoking
–Attributable Deaths in Virginia). The risk of inferior health caused by smoking in public establishments is truly intolerable. The banning of smoking
in public places would benefit everybody and should be imposed everywhere because it would reduce the risk of health problems to non–smokers,
reduce the number of smokers all together, and reduce the amount of valuable money tax payers spend on smoking related expenses.
Tobacco has been labeled a carcinogen by the CDC, WHO, and the IARC. The hazardous byproducts from one smoked cigarette can elevate the toxin
levels in a room for hours (National...show more content...
Every time he wanted to smoke he would have to repeat the process. If he were to go out to a restaurant for dinner or the bar for the ball game, he
could, but he'd have to leave the given establishment each time he wanted to smoke. This would cause such a disturbance in his daily functioning
that he would inevitably decrease how often he smoked and possibly quit completely. Just the inconvenience of the ban alone could be the extra
push needed for these people to extinguish the habit indefinitely. The ban in New York City is a prime example of how successful the bans can be.
An article from WebMD, "Helps Smoking Ban NYC Stop Smoking", states that within four years of the law being passed there was nearly quarter
million less smokers in the city alone, possibly saving nearly eighty thousand lives in the long term. It seems as though many New Yorkers have quit
their tobacco burdened lives. The great success of motivating smokers to quit smoking is just one of many reasons the ban of smoking in public places
should be implemented.
Many opponents of the ban argue that the ban infringes upon property rights. They say as a property owner they have the right to decide what legal
products and actions are allowed at their establishment. The ban states that all enclosed public places must be smoke–free. The law does not prohibit
smoking on the property but bans smoking inside of

The Banning of Smoking in Public Facilities
Thesis: Smoking in most public facilities should be banned.
I.Smoking is very unhealthy for you.
A.Smoking is the number one preventable cause of death in America.
B.About 3 million people die each year from diseases that result from
using tobacco products.
C. Tobacco contains over 4,000 chemicals most are poisons.
II.Not only is it unhealthy to you it is extremely unhealthy to others.
A.53,000 non–smoking Americans die annually from inhaling other
people?s smoke.
B.There are many diseases you can get from second hand smoke.
C. You get stains on clothes and you smell really bad when you have been
around it for a long period of time.
III....show more content...

One of the reasons smoking should be banned from public facilities is because I believe it will limit how much one person smokes. On Copper
Towers website they state that 430,000 Americans die each year due to tobacco products while 3 million people around the world die. Tobacco
contains over 4,000 chemicals, most of which are poisons. Not only is it unhealthy for you it is unhealthy to others. Secondhand smoking causes
53,000 deaths per year in the United States. In a survey I took at work 73% of current smokers said smoking should be restricted in restaurants
while 94% of those who never smoked agreed. Do you ever feel like you are smoking, even though you are not a smoker yourself? I grew up in a
family of smokers, and was constantly inhaling smoke from my parents' cigarettes. Do I now have the increased risk of developing lung cancer because
of them? And in the work place, in the lounges the air is filled with smoke, you inhale as you try to grab you a soda from the soda machine. You're not
the one smoking, but you are, in essence, because you are receiving all of the toxic effects of others' smoke into your lungs and your body. And what
about a restaurant, the smoking or nonsmoking section? That is a joke, because the smoking section is right next to the nonsmoking section. Second
hand smoke inhalation causes increased risk of lung infections and lung diseases such as pneumonia, bronchitis, asthma, emphysema, cancer, as well as,
ear

Banning Smoking Should Be Banned
Banning Smoking Tobacco in Athens Campus of Ohio University According to Ohio University president McDavis from a 2015 Ohio University "We
will join more than 1,000 campuses nationwide who ban the use of tobacco on their campuses,"(Lee). And according to execution of what the president
said and make the campus area healthy by encourage the smoker's to quit smoking, Ohio University decides to ban the smoking on any campus
property. Beside of that, the University campus will follow Smoke and Tobacco–Free Initiative policy in August 2015. Therefore, the policy will
impose by using "a community model" (Hill, 2015). That means each member at Ohio University would remain any smoker with the policy.
Moreover, Ohio University hopes the campus becomes healthier without tobacco. But, through this policy lots of members whose smoking in Ohio
University campus will be affected. So, banning smoking tobacco in Athens campus of Ohio University will not be effective for smokers for many
reasons. Fist of all, according to Tobacco–Free Initiative flyer, in order to ban tobacco, smokers should be given the opportunity to be warned, given
advice, or asked if they are interested in tobacco or not. With Smoke and Tobacco–Free Initiative policy, the smokers may pull themselves from that
habit without any force from Ohio university policy and that's fine. But as that will happen, I do not think the Smoke and Tobacco–Free Initiative
policy purposes to make Ohio University campus a healthy and

Essay on Arguments For and Against a Smoking Ban
Tobacco is one of the most widely–used recreational drugs in the world; mainly in the form of cigarettes, but also in cigars and pipes, and in
combination with cannabis and marijuana in 'joints'. Although most countries put age restrictions on its use, over a billion adults smoke tobacco
legally every day, and supplying this demand is big business. As well as having serious health consequences for smokers themselves, the pollution of
other people's atmospheres with cigarette smoke also makes this an environmental issue. Attitudes have changed rapidly over the past twenty years. In
the developed world, public opinion has shifted against smoking. By the 1990s, the sheer weight of evidence had forced...show more content...
The law steps in to prevent citizens causing harm to others, whether deliberately or accidentally. However, it should not stop them taking risks
themselves – for example, dangerous sports such as rock–climbing, parachuting or motor–racing are legal. It is also legal to indulge in other
health–threatening activities such as eating lots of fatty foods, taking no exercise, and drinking too much alcohol. Banning smoking would be an
unmerited intrusion into personal freedom.
2) Cigarettes are very different from dangerous cars or poisonous foods. As the proposition points out, cigarettes are not dangerous because they are
defective; rather they are inherently, potentially, harmful. But people should still be allowed to choose to buy and smoke them. A better comparison is
to unhealthy foods. High cholesterol or a high intake of fat can be extremely harmful, leading to heart disease, obesity, and other conditions; but
manufacturers of these products are not punished. Consumers simply like the taste of fatty food. People should be allow to smoke cigarettes and to eat
fatty foods – both these things are sources of pleasure which, while having serious associated health risks, are only fatal after many decades, unlike a
poisonous food or an unsafe car, which pose immediate and high risks.
3) A comparison to hard drugs is inaccurate– tobacco is not debilitating in the same way that many

Pros And Cons Of Banning Smoking In Public Places
As Campaign for Tobacco–Free Kids (n.d.) says "People who die each year from their own cigarette smoking or exposure to second hand smoke are
more than 480,000 in the U.S only"(p.1). Many people debate on should or should not smoking in public places be banned. Everyone knows that
smoking harms our health and destroys every organ in our body. It also affects our environment negatively. Many people do not know thattobacco was
found in America before thousands of years ago. At first people started chewing tobacco and they only smoke it during specific events as been said by
the "A brief history of smoking" (2011, p.1). It was considered as a type of accessories for a man to hold a tobacco in his hand. Some people see it as a
sign of being mature and old enough so that people would take him seriously and not to mess with him. It became a habit and a trend among people
with different ages to smoke cigarettes with variety of flavors and nicotine. However, nowadays scientists and doctors did many studies, that smoking
destroys our health and harms non–smokers as well. Smoking also may cause death at young age. Therefore, it is argued that smoking...show more
content...
Smokers should think seriously to stop smoking since it is considered as suicide. It increases the chances of having cancer in every organ in the
human's body which leads to death. As long as it destroys the human's health it also effects our environment negatively by increasing air pollution.
Moreover, Smokers should realize that they are role models for the younger generation which include their brothers and sisters and even their children.
Therefore, smokers should not be selfish and think about themselves only; they should look around them and see that there is at least one person who
cares about them. Since smokers are still alive; it is never too late to stop smoking and start a healthy

Essay on Banning Smoking in Public Places
In today's environment many suffer illnesses from pollution, and second hand smoke, and they seek for cleaner air. About five years ago, the health
department was successful in banning smoking in public places and smokers needed to go outside unless companies set–up a designated area for
smoking. Now, in Pierce County, smoking is banned in all public places such as restaurants, bars, casinos,hotels and taverns. This has caused an up
roar with the business owners losing customers and money because of this ban. Within the health department satisfaction is in the environment because
the workers will finally have working conditions that has clean air.
This has caused many businesses to decide on closing the doors after feeling a little...show more content...
Remind you that local bartenders at taverns do not get paid that on one shift, so they will be forcing their customers to take it outside.
Many customers are not happy with the idea of not being able to smoke while enjoying their time playing pool, pull tabs, darts, watching the ball games
and drinking. For years alcohol and smoking has been a common entertainment for many people within the community. Banning smoking in these
establishments will not only cause profit loss with these companies but also within the tobacco, alcohol industry and the state. Like anything else things
trickle and many people are not understanding a lot of the tax money that comes from these sales pays for many things in the community. If we think
we have a problem now within funding wait until the impact of this comes to the state, many things and places will be shutting down and won't only be
the so called sinful joints.
As many people who are working in these establishments are seeking clean air and a better health, have pushed the issue of banning smoking within
these establishments. Many will ask themselves, is time to quite smoking or where else can I go to enjoy myself? We need to really analyze a how
much can the state have control over people and the business that are in the community. Is this a sign of to much control or just someone

Effects Of Banning Smoking Advertising Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Featured

Featured (20)

Effects Of Banning Smoking Advertising Essay