Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Parallel Session 2.3.2 What's Your Problem? Lessons on How to Solve National and Local Challenges

285 views

Published on

Published in: Health & Medicine
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Parallel Session 2.3.2 What's Your Problem? Lessons on How to Solve National and Local Challenges

  1. 1. Safety Culture the journey inpaediatrics – so far......
  2. 2. Scottish Patient Safety Paediatric Programme• Success of SPSP – adopted work streams.• SPSPP launched – June 2010• Inpatient paediatric care (all ages).• Aims: – paediatric evidence-base; – „best in class‟; – linked to measurable outcomes.• Dynamic quality improvement programme.• Relevant to paediatric hospital care delivered in Scotland.
  3. 3. SPSPP Key Aim: 30% reduction in adverse events by June 2013 “Harm” – anything done you wouldn‟t like done to yourself
  4. 4. Defining the problem
  5. 5. Measuring Harm – Paediatric Trigger ToolAim: 30% reduction in Adverse Events (measured by PTT) by June 2013 140 120 per 1000 patient days 100 80 60 40 20 Median = 0 0
  6. 6. What can we do with the data?
  7. 7. Working with People 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%Adapted from R Scoville, R Lloyd, IHI
  8. 8. Subject Matter Experts Triggers not Liked the multi- applicable to disciplinary DGH care approach to reviews Culture shift –Adverse Events understanding „rare events‟ – of harm!how to improve Many triggers addressed by SPSPP
  9. 9. What are we trying to accomplish?
  10. 10. The aim.....
  11. 11. Testing / Change Concepts • Methodology • Review to follow admission • Identify what causes harm / common system failures – Long-term conditions – Child Protection
  12. 12. What change can we make that will result in improvement?SPSPP Avoidable Harm - Structured Case Note ReviewIs Avoidable Harm Indicator Present? y n Was there y n Was harm y n comments documentation state harm? grade preventable? missing E-IDid the child deteriorate? If yes... Failure to recognise? Highlight parental concerns not actioned. Failure to escalate? Escalation failure? Failure to adhere to standard practice or local/national guidance? Delay in administering treatment? If AVPU abnormal were full neuro obs documented? Was there an escalation of level of care, i.e. child admitted to HDU/PICU?
  13. 13. How will we know a change is an improvement?
  14. 14. Improvement Journey
  15. 15. Cultural Shift –Adverse Events to Avoidable Harm Trigger Tool Measure Methodology „avoidable harm Harm within wards Support local quality improvement to reduce avoidable injury and harm

×