Outward foreign direct investment

1. Analysis on the motivation and
challenges of outward foreign direct
investment of Chinese enterprises
SUBMITTED BY: HOSSEN MOHAMMED JABER
SID: 671801010105
DPT: International business and trade

2. Contents
Abstract.............................................................................................................................................2
Introduction.......................................................................................................................................2
Motivationsfor Chinese OFDI..............................................................................................................3
Methodologies for Chinese OFDIT .......................................................................................................4
The course of IJVs...............................................................................................................................4
The course of entirely claimed abroad auxiliaries .................................................................................4
The course of cross-line consolidations and acquisitions.......................................................................5
Challenges for Chinese OFDI................................................................................................................5
Conclusion .........................................................................................................................................6
References.........................................................................................................................................7

3. Abstract
Thispaperexaminesthe remarkable motivationsforoutwardforeigndirectinvestment(OFDI) attempted
by Chinese multinationals, and addresses the challenges related with these interesting motivations and
systems. The discoveriesshow thatChinese OFDIisessentiallydeterminedbyessentialresource chasing,
and state possession fills in as a remarkable kind of proprietorship preferences. Chinese multinationals
normally utilize forceful modes, for example, completelypossessed auxiliaries and acquisitions to enter
unfamiliar business sectors, yet the related difficulties of those forceful modes in post-passage
combinationare notunimportant.Thispapergivesanextensiveviewonhypothesisof ChineseOFDIand
offerscommonsense directionforChinese multinationalsintheirworldwidedevelopmentbydelineating
the procedures and difficulties of Chinese OFDI.
Keywords:Foreign direct investment(FDI);Business;World Trade Organization (WTO); Double door;
Open door; Cross-border; Chinese enterprises; Global competition
Introduction
Inthe course of recentmanyyears,Chinesemultinationalshavemade animmensemeasureof unfamiliar
directspeculationabroad,makingChinaone of the world'sdrivingunfamiliarspeculators.The marvel has
not been generally concentrated from a business viewpoint, be that as it may. Given the expanding
noticeable quality of Chinese MNCs in worldwide business, this investigation of both full scal e and
miniature informational collectionsouttofill the hole byfocusingonthe thoughtprocessesfundamental
Chinese MNCstocontribute abroad. Withthe 'open door'strategydispatchedbythe focal governmentin
1978, Chinastarted the cycle of joining withthe worldwide economy,andthiscycle wasquickenedwith
increase to the World Trade Organization (WTO). A unique marvel that has portrayed China's
improvement is a new flood in its outward unfamiliar direct venture (OFDI). After 'go global' was
immovablysettledasa publicarrangementin2004,more Chinese homegrownfirmsgotanxioustoenter
and contendin the global market.The World InvestmentReport2014 statesthat FDI fromterrain China
arrived at US$101 billion of every 2013, speaking to an expansion of 18.36 occasions that in 2014. The
Chinese ostracize surge stockwas812,000 towardthe finishof 2011, an expansionof 322,000 individuals
since the finish of 2002. Chinese global endeavors (MNEs) recruited around 880,000 nearby
representatives in host nations, which speaks to 72.8% as a business limitation rate; and took 331,780
Chinese representatives to work in unfamiliar auxiliaries in 2011.
Numerous unfamiliar acquisitions by Chinese ventures, for example, Lenovo, TCL, and Haier have
snatched features of the mainstream press and business magazines. Despite critical expansion in the
measure of Chinese OFDI as of late, it is important that numerous Chinese endeavors miss the mark
regarding their expressed destinations for their abroad tasks. Consequently, it is critical to audit and
examine the OFDI exercises of Chinese endeavors, and distinguish the troubles which impede their
practices in their global tasks.
In this paper, I present a system that investigates the uniqueness of Chinese ventures' OFDI exercises,
including the inspirations, procedures and difficulties which these associations face. In view of the
conversation, some examination questions are proposed to give a superior comprehension of this
wonder, and to give valuable direction to Chinese ventures' outward development through OFDI.

4. Motivations for Chinese OFDI
From a conventional viewpoint, unfamiliar direct venture (FDI) from created nations was embraced to
abuse modest work and crude materials in agricultural nations, and simultaneously offering better
innovation or administrative expertise than make profit. Later research on OFDI from non-industrial
nations, particularly that from developing business sectors, distinguishes that such OFDI is very
extraordinary not just on the grounds that it is attempted looking for vital resources, for example,
innovation and administrative abilities as opposed to offering them, yet additionally in light of the fact
that it has been firmly impacted by home and host nation institutional environments. As quite possibly
the maindevelopingbusinesssectors,Chinainitiallywentintoothernon-industrial nationseithertouse
its preferencesin innovation, or to fortify political affiliationswith those growing countries. Recently,
increasingly more Chinese undertakings enter created nations to seek after essential resources, for
example, innovation and brand. In option, China may encourage its OFDI with exceptional highlights
because of the unmistakable institutional settingsof itseconomy.The current writingrecommendsthat
there are both traditional and peculiar measurements to Chinese OFDI. The customary inspirations of
Chinese OFDI, which are like those of other developing business sector multinationals(MNEs), can be
summed up as following:
 Home government uphold for going abroad;
 To try not to increment serious pressing factor from worldwide opponents in their backyard;
 Fast difference in economic situations and an increased borderless world economy;
 The maverick position and their lacks in center competencies;
 Entrepreneurial craving to hit the center global business sectors.
Be that as itmay,as referencedpreviously,OFDIfromChineseventuresmayhave special attributesgiven
the enormousdegree of state control of the Chinese economy.Peculiarhighlightsof Chinese OFDIhave
been distinguished which include:
 Significantly determined by common asset chasing and vital resource looking for incentives;
 State proprietorship may fill in as a particular sort of possession advantages;
 Availability of modest capital from the state will in general make inefficient OFDI.
Inviewof standardglobal businesswriting,there are forthe mostpartfive inspirationsformultinationals
to contribute abroad: to acquire assets,innovation,markets,enhancement,andkeyresources.From an
inside and out investigation of venture information and cases from Chinese MNCs, we discovered
inspirationsthatare comparativehoweverforcertainparticularhighlights.Inspite of the factthatwe put
eachcase in one classification,the differentiationwasnotineverycase clear- cut;a Chinese organization
could be seeking after numerousgoals from a speculation project. Besides, the inspirations for FDI may
likewise change, for example,a venture becoming an accomplishedspeculator. At first, some Chinese
firms have contributed abroad to secure characteristic assets or access markets; with expanded
worldwidetasks,notwithstanding,theymightbe utilizingtheirventureexercisesasawaytoimprovetheir
worldwide market position by procuring new wellsprings of upper hand.

5. Methodologies for Chinese OFDIT
Here are three passage modesbeingusedbyChinese MNEstowardOFDI.These are (1) the global joint
endeavors(IJVs);(2) the completelyclaimedabroadauxiliaries;and(3) the cross-line consolidationsand
acquisitions(M&As).Chinese MNEsutilizedIJVsasaprimaryOFDI technique preceding2000, and the
completelypossessedauxiliariesgotpredominantafter 2000. Since 2004, the cross-line M&Asarise as
an undeniablymostlovedmethodof OFDIbyChinese MNEs.Asindicatedbythe Ministryof Commerce
(MOC) of China,the measure of OFDIthroughcross-line M&Asbouncesfrom$4.8 billionoutof 2004, to
$47.4 billionoutof 2006 whichrepresents36.7% of the all-outOFDIinthatyear.It is actuallyas what
the current writinghasproposed:Chinahasenteredatime of cross-line M&As.
The course of IJVs
IJVs allude to Chinese firms framing another substance with at least one unfamiliar endeavor, and
they profit by the exchange of able administration aptitudes and information from the proceeding,
operational relationship with these unfamiliar MNEs. The experience of such internal
internationalization allows the capacity acquirement of Chinese ventures which invigorate the
ensuing OFDI. For instance, Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. has gone into various IJVs - to make 3G
handsets with NEC which is a Japanese data innovation undertaking, and furthermore help out
Microsoft to make networks that coordinate voice, information and video. Presently Huawei has set
up R&D focusesinIndia and itisgenuinelytestingthe worldwide pioneers,for example,CiscoSystems
in the field of organization and media transmission gear.
The course of entirely claimed abroad auxiliaries
This sort of OFDI isembraced by setting up new elementsinan unfamiliarmarket. It is at first pointed
toward acquiring worldwide brand acknowledgment or making sure about item separation as
proprietorship favorable circumstances to amplify abroad market. Haier Group gives a genuine
illustrationof such worldwide extension.Under the worldwide brand buildingsystem, Haier originally
fabricated exchange and R&D focuses in America. Possessing to moving into item separation, for
example, assembling of little coolers with study work areas especially for use by understudies and
smaller than usual dishwashers for housewives, Haier effectively shows its items in US huge chain
general stores, for example, Wal-Mart and Sears. What's more, it has presented new items, for
example, wine coolers and lavish 'twofold entryway' huge fridges to the US and European business
sectors which encouraged it win incredible customer steadfastness. Presently Haier is the world's
fourth biggest white merchandise producer and has set up 30 abroad creation processing plants, 8
plan habitats and more than 58,000 deals specialists around the world.

6. The course of cross-line consolidations and acquisitions
Cross-line consolidations and acquisitions (M&As) allude to the purchasing, selling and joining of
organizations from variousnationsinto one businesselement. A consolidation happens when two firms
meetup and make a solitarynewelement,while anobtaininghappenswhenone organizationassumes
control over another and settle on a concurrence with the gained organization to build up itself as the
new proprietor. In any case, such M&As can be antagonistic takeovers which are those only gainful for
investors yet conflicts with the objective organization's administration and governing body. Of all the
Chinese cross-line M&A exchanges,almost half have been attempted by huge state-possessed ventures
with the intension of making sure about crude material supplies. Another explanationbehind endeavor
OFDI through cross-line M&As is on the grounds that they give a quick course to get to cutting edge
innovation, R&D aptitudes just as legitimate brand which will help the obtaining organization develop
quickly. It is recognizable that the objective of Chinese firms' M&As mostly centered around evolved
nations firms who have such serious resources. Aside from the Lenovo Group, the Nanjing Automobile
gives another genuine model. With the fruitful experience of IJVs with a few progressed market MNEs,
Nanjing Automobile builds up its certaintyto gain MG Rover, a large-scale manufacturing vehicle maker
in the British engine industry. This obtaining is embraced with an essential goal to update Nanjing
Automobile's creation line just as build up its own R&D capacities. It is without question that Nanjing
Automobile access unfamiliar refreshed advances, licenses and administrative abilities rapidly [16]. In
outline,the cross-line M&A course asan essential methodof OFDIissupportedbyan expandingnumber
of Chinese MNEs. Such a move is deliberately chosen dependent on the thought of firms' essential
objectivesof lookingfordifferentsortsof seriousresources.The particularelementof generallyutilizing
the forceful speculation method of cross-line M&As reflect the craving to develop quickly of Chinese
MNEs, and the readiness in holding their unmistakable administrative legacy. In any case, the dangers
relatedwithsuchventure mode are innoway,shape orformto be dismissed.Genuinedifficultiesstayin
Chinese firms' OFDI exercises which will be talked about in the accompanying segment.
Challenges for Chinese OFDI
The above conversationhasrecognizedthatcross-line M&Ashave gottenprogressivelyfamousasof late
as a type of Chinese MNEs'OFDI.In spite of the fact that the M&A mode isseenby numerousindividuals
as the quickest and simplest approach to venture into another market, for instance, it can give snappy
admittance to neighborhood information and business contacts and so forth, the achievement of such
mode is inno way,shape or formguaranteed.The genuine testtoChinese MNEs' OFDI exercisesrelates
to post-passage,orpost-M&A incorporation. Challengesof post-sectionreconciliationmightbe inferable
from a few variables, which basically center around the accompanying two issues:
• Differences in culture and administrative practice experienced in an unfamiliar market; and
• Lack of appropriately qualified work force who have global administration skills.
First of all, distinctions in culture and administrative practice represent the main test to Chinese MNEs'
post-M&A combination.AsperareportfromtheWorldBank,almost66% of Chineseendeavorsneglected
toarrive attheirexpressedobjectiveswhencontributingabroad.85percentof the CEOsof theseventures
concede that 'distinctionsin corporate societies and administrative stylesare the principle explanations
behinddisappointment'.Forinstance,TCL'sPresidentLi hasevendeclaredthatthe disappointmentof the
consolidation among TCL and Alcatel is a direct result of social contrariness - most key ability including

7. rankingdirectorsandadvertisingstaff leftthe organizationsincetheycouldn'tadjusttotheadministration
approachesof theirnewChineseproprietor.'itishuman-arrangedadministrationinAlcatel,whilebrought
togetherdynamicinChinese firms'.Anothersignificanttestisthe absence of abilitywithinformationon
unfamiliarbusinesssectorsandglobal administration aptitudes. The testisn'tjustthe measure of human
abilityhoweverwhatsorts of ranges of abilitiestheyhave.Adequate informationaboutthe hostnation,
includinginformationonthe unknowndialect,businessculture,rivalrystrategyandinstitutional climate,
isneededasvaluable abilitiesfordealingwith abroad’s tasks.Withoutthe pool of humanability,China's
OFDIyearningswillbe defeatedandfinancial developmentwill slow.Forinstance,ZhangRuimin,the CEO
of Haier,featuresinhisarticlethat"ThereisawideholebetweenChineseendeavorsandmajorunfamiliar
organizations –howeveritisn'tprimarilyaninnovationhole.The keycontrastisinadministrationability".
To summarize,itisquestionable thatChina'sOFDIisasyetin a newbornchildstage andthe genuine test
isn't the means by which to enter an unfamiliar market, yet how to deal with the mix cycle after their
entrance.Inlikemanner,itisof pivotalsignificanceforthe ChineseMNEstoviablyandproficientlydealing
withthe coordinationcycle andutilizingthe obtainedresourcesasaspringboardto update theirabilities
and effectivelycontendinthe global market.Inthe yearsto come, we anticipate critical developmentin
China's OFDI, particularly through cross-line M&As with the essential goal to secure information and
capacities.Be that as it may,most investigationsof Chinese OFDIcenteraroundpre-sectioninspirations,
yet not many of those have tended to inquiries in the post-passage stage, especially in the post-M&A
coordination measure. It is without question that more exploration is requiredin this specific territory.
Exclusivelybyunderstandingthe basiccycle of post-section,orpost-M&A combinationwouldwe be able
tohelporguide theseChineseMNEstobecome speedier,andperformpreferredinthe worldwidemarket
over it ought to be.
Conclusion
This paper audits and dissects the current writing on the OFDI exercises of Chinese MNEs, with the
essential expectation of having a superior comprehension of Chinese MNEs dependent on China's
exceptional institutional climate. Accordingly, it inspects the inspirations methodologies and
difficulties of Chinese MNEs, and the essential discoveries recommend that the OFDI exercises of
Chinese MNEs vary altogether from that of Western MNEs just as other developing business sector
MNEs. OFDI from Chinese MNEs isn't just determined by regular inspirations, for example, home
government uphold, progressively serious homegrown rivalry, maverick situations in the worldwide
rivalry [4,14], yet in additiondriven by eccentric inspirations which include:critical characteristic plan
of action looking for just as essential resource looking for motivations; State possession filledin as a
particular sort of proprietorship advantage in China previously; and unnecessary OFDI ledbecause of
the defective capital portion. Subsequently, the uniqueness of Chinese MNEs' OFDI exercises is
essentially ascribed to the one-of-a-kind institutional setting of the Chinese economy, for example,
extraordinary degree of state control. From the viewpoint of system, a prominent pattern is the
steady appearance of utilizing cross-line M&As as an essential mode for OFDI exercises contrasted
with different structures, including IJVs just as the entirely possessed abroad auxiliaries. In spite of
the fact that the method of cross-line M&As is proposed to be the quickest and most straightforward
approach to enter another market, the genuine test relates to post-M&A combination. Critical
difficultiesstoodupto by Chinese MNEs during theirpost-M&A incorporation are distinguishedwhich
remember contrasts for culture just as the executives, and absence of the board ability. Chinese

8. MNEs actually have far to go with regards to viably and productively coordinating the procured
resources into theirown business.Albeita few parts of the challengesin post-M&A combination have
been distinguished, further investigation of how Chinese MNEs can deal with this basic cycle is
probably going to be fulfilling.Thisexaminationrecommends that there are a few inquiriesdeserving
of additional exploration, to be specific: "What sorts of troubles will Chinese supervisors experience
in the post-M&A joining,particularly when they put resources into created nations?" and "What are
the contrasts among Chinese and average Western administrative ways to deal with deciding, just as
overseeing subordinates?" Answering these inquiries may assist us with understanding the
incorporation cycle better and as needs be, give us a profound knowledge of Chinese MNEs' OFDI
exercises. Investigating the post-M&A reconciliation cycle of Chinese MNEs won't just add to the
current global business writing, yet in addition give helpful experiences into Chinese MNEs' OFDI
rehearses.
References
1. Bräutigam D, Tang X (2014) Going Global in Groups: Structural Transformation and China’s Special
Economic Zones Overseas. World Development 63: 78-91
2. Guthrie D (2012) China and globalization:the social,economicandpolitical transformationof Chinese
society. Routledge.
3. Morck R, YeungB, Zhao M (2008) PerspectivesonChina’sOutwardForeignDirectInvestment.Journal
of International Business Studies 39: 337-350.
4. Deng P (2013) Chinese outward direct investment research: theoretical integration and
recommendations. Management and Organization Review 9: 513-539.
5. Wang D, Feng T, Freeman S, Fan D, Zhu CJ (2014) Unpacking the skill – cross-cultural competence
mechanisms: Empirical evidence from Chinese expatriate managers. International Business Review 23:
530-541.
6. UNCTAD (United Nation Conference Trade and Development) (2014) World Investment Report 2014.
United Nations, New York.
7. MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce, People’s Republic of China) (2014) Statistical Bulletin of China’s
Outward Foreign Direct Investment. China Statistics Press, Beijing.
8. TungRL (2007) The HumanResource ChallengetoOutwardForeignDirectInvestmentAspirationsFrom
EmergingEconomies:The Case of China.International Journal of HumanResource Management18: 868-
889.
9. DunningJH (1981) International productionandThe Multinational Enterprise.Allen&Unwin,London.
10. ChildJ,MarinovaS (2014) The Role of Contextual Combinationsinthe Globalizationof Chinese Firms.
Management and Organization Review 10: 347-371.
11. Luo Y, Tung R (2007) International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises: A Springboard
Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 38: 481-498.

9. 12. Child J, Rodrigues SB (2005) The Internationalization of Chinese Firms: A Case for Theoretical
Extension. Management and Organization Review 1: 381-410.
13. DengP(2004) OutwardInvestmentbyChineseMNCs:MotivationsandImplications.BusinessHorizons
47: 8-16.
14. Deng P (2009) Why do Chinese firms tend to acquire strategic assets in international expansion?
Journal of World Business 44: 74-84.
15. Rui H, Yip GS (2008) ForeignAcquisitionsbyChinese Firms:A StrategicIntentPerspective.Journal of
World Business 43: 213-226.
16. Lyles M, Li D, Yan H (2014) Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment Performance: The Role of
Learning. Management and Organization Review 10: 411-437
17. BuckleyPJ,CrossAR,TanH,LiuX,VossH(2006) AnExaminationof RecentTrendsinChinese Outbound
Direct Investment. CIBUL Working Paper. University of Leeds, Leeds.
18. ChenD, PaikY, Park SH (2010) Host-countrypoliciesandMNE managementcontrol inIJVs:Evidence
from China. Journal of International Business Studies. 41: 526-537.
19. SlangenAHL(2013) Greenfieldoracquisitionentry?The rolesof policyuncertaintyandMNElegitimacy
in host countries. Global Strategy Journal. 3: 262-280.
20. Fang Y, Wade M, DeliosA,BeamishPW(2013) An explorationof multinational enterprise knowledge
resources and foreign subsidiary performance. Journal of World Business 48: 30-38.
21. Zhang R (2007) Raising Haier. Harvard Business Review 85: 141-146.
22. Sun SL, Peng MW, Ren B, Yan D (2012) A comparative ownership advantage framework for cross-
border M&As: The rise of Chinese and Indian MNEs. Journal of World Business 47: 4-16