Formulating and clarifying the research topic is the starting point of your research project (Ghauri and Grønhaug 2005; Smith and Dainty 1991). Once you are clear about this, you will be able to choose the most appropriate research strategy and data collection and analysis techniques.
The formulating and clarifying process is time consuming and will probably take you up blind alleys (Saunders and Lewis 1997). However, without spending time on this stage you are far less likely to achieve a successful project (Raimond 1993).
In the initial stages of the formulating and clarifying process you will be generating and refining research ideas (Section 2.3). It may be that you have already been given a research idea, perhaps by an organisation or tutor. Even if this has happened you will still need to refine the idea into one that is feasible. Once you have done this you will need to turn the idea into research questions and objectives (Section 2.4) and to write the research proposal for your project (Section 2.5).
However, before you start the formulating and clarifying process we believe that you need to understand what makes a good research topic. For this reason we begin this chapter with a discussion of
In addition, your research topic must be something you are capable of undertaking
and one that excites your imagination. Capability can be considered in a variety of ways.
At the personal level you need to feel comfortable that you have, or can develop, the skills
that will be required to research the topic. We hope that you will develop your research
skills as part of undertaking your project. However, some skills, for example foreign languages,
may be impossible to acquire in the time you have available. As well as having
the necessary skills we believe that you also need to have a genuine interest in the topic.
Most research projects are undertaken over at least a six-month period. A topic in which
you are only vaguely interested at the start is likely to become a topic in which you have
no interest and with which you will fail to produce your best work.
Your ability to find the financial and time resources to undertake research on the topic
will also affect your capability. Some topics are unlikely to be possible to complete in the
time allowed by your course of study. This may be because they require you to measure
the impact of an intervention over a long time period (Box 2.1). Similarly, topics that
are likely to require you to travel widely or need expensive equipment should also be
disregarded unless financial resources permit.
Capability also means you must be reasonably certain of gaining access to any data
you might need to collect. Gill and Johnson (2002) argue that this is usually relatively
straightforward to assess. They point out that many people start with ideas where access
to data will prove difficult. Certain, more sensitive topics, such as financial performance
or decision making by senior managers, are potentially fascinating. However, they may
present considerable access problems.
Refining research ideas
The Delphi technique
An additional approach that our students have found particularly useful in refining their
research ideas is the Delphi technique (Box 2.5). This involves using a group of people
who are either involved or interested in the research idea to generate and choose a more
specific research idea (Robson 2002). To use this technique you need:
1 to brief the members of the group about the research idea (they can make notes if they
wish);
2 at the end of the briefing to encourage group members to seek clarification and more
information as appropriate;
3 to ask each member of the group, including the originator of the research idea, to
generate independently up to three specific research ideas based on the idea that has
been described (they can also be asked to provide a justification for their specific
ideas);
4 to collect the research ideas in an unedited and non-attributable form and to distribute
them to all members of the group;
5 a second cycle of the process (steps 2 to 4) in which individuals comment on the
research ideas and revise their own contributions in the light of what others have said;
Research objectives require more rigorous thinking, which derives from the use of more formal language. Maylor and Blackmon (2005) recommend that personal objectives may be added to the list of research objectives. These may be concerned with your specific learning objectives from completion of the research (e.g. to learn how to use a particular statistical software package or improve your word processing ability) or more general personal objectives such as enhancing your career prospects through learning about a new field of your specialism. Maylor and Blackmon suggest that such personal objectives would be better were they to pass the well-known SMART test. That is that the objectives are:
• Specific. What precisely do you hope to achieve from undertaking the research?
• Measurable. What measures will you use to determine whether you have achieved your objectives? (e.g. secured a career-level first job in software design).
• Achievable. Are the targets you have set for yourself achievable given all the possible constraints?