SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 44
Download to read offline
The Elomatic Magazine 1·2014
Product testing
Gaining
a competitive
advantage
page 4
Biohazards
Air tightness
testing for
biosafety level 3
page 22
Oil & gas
Jet pump
technology
page 40
“We need a rational and defendable
standard that satisfies industrial,
regulatory and public interests.”
–Milind Shinde
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  2  |  3
The mystery of the human mind has fascinated man-
kind over the centuries. Ancient philosophers and cur-
rent day cognitive scientists have tried to understand what
makes the human brain the ultimate tool and such a unique
instrument.
  The ability to learn new things is a lifelong process and
different individuals absorb knowledge differently depend-
ing on their specific backgrounds. Experience and age are
commonly perceived to be the main determinants when
analysing the development of a person’s cognitive ability.
One should not, however, underestimate the importance
of motivation, emotion and a healthy life style in successful
learning processes.
  According to cognitive scientists intelligence and learn-
ing ability take various forms. Components such as percep-
tion, memory, association, concept formation, problem solv-
ing and mental imagery play an important role when trying
to figure out the holistic outcome of the learning process.
Some educational institutes offer scholars courses such as
“Theory of Knowledge”in their curriculums. Students are en-
couraged to discover the views of and justifications for dif-
ferent issues, rather than debating the rights or wrongs of
those phenomena.
  The strength of mankind lies also in our ability to work
together and produce something called “group cognition”.
In addition to traditional physical group work, collaborative
learning can benefit from different networks that can easily
be accessed across digital media applications.
  It is not farfetched to claim that nations without vast
amounts on natural resources are particularly dependent on
their ability to innovate and create opportunities to remain
competitive. In addition to various academic institutions and
research centres, engineering companies play an important
role in creating wealth through innovation and research. This
technical journal is an example of the intellectual capacity
that a modern engineering company must possess and de-
liver for the benefit of its customers. Hopefully reading the
articles will provide you with a positive learning experience
and a healthy challenge to your cognitive learning abilities.
Heikki Pöntynen
Editor-in-Chief
Photo©2014Elomatic/OlliTuomola
Thinking and awareness
The Elomatic Magazine
renews its face
The Elomatic Newsletter has received a new face and
will from now on be published under the “Top Engi-
neer” banner to better reflect the content and target
audience of our magazine. The name has changed,
but our goal of providing our readers with informative
and cutting edge technical articles remains the same.
We look forward to hearing your feedback about your
reading experience.
Heikki
Contents
1/2014
Publisher
Elomatic
Itäinen Rantakatu 72
20810 Turku, Finland
Tel. +358 2 412 411
info@elomatic.com
www.elomatic.com
Editor-in-Chief
Heikki Pöntynen
heikki.pontynen@elomatic.com
Editor
Martin Brink
martin.brink@elomatic.com
Art Director
Olli Tuomola
olli.tuomola@elomatic.com
Milind Shinde
Air tightness testing
for biosafety level 3
22
Mika Kuhmonen & Arto Sampo
Gaining a competitive advantage
– Testing products in simulated environments
4
Martin Brink
Still Going Strong: Heikki Pirilä
– 30 years in starch processing 	 8
Juha Järvenreuna & Mika Nummila
Modern flue gas scrubber – significant
improvements in the profitability
of bioenergy heating plants 	 12
Vladimir Pöyhönen
Virtualisation of automation systems
– a brave new world	 16
Harri Hytönen
Human errors – usability as a safety
factor in working environments	 20
Vishal Bundele
Containment Engineering
– A systematic approach to handle
highly potent active ingredients
and pathogens	 28
Kari Haimi
Computational Electromagnetics
– simulating the harmful effects
of electromagnetic fields 	 32
Timo Piirainen & Jukka Mikkonen
Creativity and Method
– the cornerstones of success	 34
Martin Brink
Jet pump technology for artificial
lift in oil and gas production
40
If you would like to receive a copy of the Top Engineer,
or would like to be added to our Top Engineer mailing
list please send your request to info@elomatic.com.
Elomatic believes that all information provided in this
publication is correct at the time of printing. Elomatic
is not responsible for any inadvertent errors.
Elomatic holds the copyright to all materials contained
in this publication, unless specified otherwise. Written
permission from Elomatic is required for the reproduc-
tion of articles in whole or in part.
Cover: Milind Shinde works at the Elomatic Mum-
bai office. Background photo © 2013 Wavebreak Me-
dia Ltd.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  4  |  5
Gaining
a competitive
advantage
  – Testing products in simulated environments : case Wärtsilä
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  4  |  5
Taking good products and turn-
ing them into world beaters is
becoming increasingly demand-
ing as customers’ expectations
with regards quality, dependa-
bility, economical performance
and costs show no bounds. User
experiences, modern computer
simulations and other analysis
tools are integral parts of efficient
product design, but in some cas-
es they do not suffice to take the
product to the next level. In such
cases testing real products in vir-
tually real conditions has become
a key resource in gaining the ex-
tra competitive edge required.
◄◄ A test bench used to test propulsion
devices in real seagoing conditions.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  6  |  7
Implementing testing of real prod-
ucts is fairly straightforward when the
product is relatively small and its oper-
ational conditions close to the norm.
Once the product size increases and
the operational conditions are more
challenging, the situation quickly be-
comes quite the opposite.
  One only has to imagine the diffi-
culties associated with the testing of
satellites, space ships or submarines in
real-life conditions to understand that
in those cases it is almost impossible,
or at least extremely costly to conduct
the necessary testing in real-life con-
ditions.
  The testing of new technologies is
often left for maiden voyages and cus-
tomer projects, which comes with un-
wanted added commercial risks. Lab-
oratories that can test real products
under realistic conditions have, there-
fore, become a key tool in expediting
product or technology development.
Such laboratories facilitate learning
about the product and its behaviour
and speed up the product technology
development cycle.
Propulsion device test centre
simulates real seagoing loads
Wärsilä Ltd’s recently implemented
propulsion device test centre in Tuu-
sula, southern Finland is a good exam-
ple of a product testing facility that fa-
cilitates significant technology leaps in
product development. See picture on
previous spread. The centre allows real
propulsion devices to be tested in vir-
tually real seagoing and harbour con-
ditions, while also allowing for the ef-
fects of icy conditions to be taken into
consideration. The project was imple-
mented by Wärsilä in cooperation with
the VTT Technical Research Centre of
Finland and Elomatic Ltd, which deliv-
ered the test bench of the centre on an
EPCM basis.
  The effectiveness of new technologi-
cal solutions can be tested at the cen-
tre, after which they can be transferred
directly to end products. This signifi-
cantly speeds up the development of
product performance and the identi-
fication of new possibilities. The test
centre is a world first and allows the
development of more effective and ef-
ficient propulsion devices for the glob-
al Marine industry.
  The testing laboratory is a rather im-
pressive sight. It has to accommodate
products for testing that weigh up to
20 tonnes, are 4 metres high and pro-
duce almost 3 MW power output. Add
to that the creation of seagoing and icy
conditions and the extent of the centre
becomes clear.
Relatively long testing times
While on the test bench the product
can be exposed to the exact fluctuat-
ing loads it will experience at sea. Even
the cooling effects of ocean currents
has been accounted for. The testing
times are relatively long and can last
for several weeks. The testing system is
very flexible with regards how loads are
placed on the tested product, at what
frequency and cycle and for how long
tests are conducted.
  During a typical test the device col-
lects measurement data from over
a hundred different measurement
points. The measurement points and
measurement scales can be altered
from one test to the next.
  The test centre allows different par-
ties to work together in the develop-
ment and testing of new technologies.
This cooperation includes customers,
research centres, universities and sup-
pliers.
  The implementation of the propul-
sion device test centre at Wärsilä is a
shining example of how advanced test-
ing technologies can be used to opti-
mize product development and the
implementation of new technologies.
All eyes are on them now to see what
new and ground-breaking features
they will develop with the aid of this
technology. The sky is the limit.
When should analysis
and user experience
make way for
laboratory testing?
■■ Product operates in condi-
tions that renders measuring
and testing too difficult or ex-
pensive
■■ Product is affected by com-
plex dynamics
■■ Generating results is extremely
time consuming
■■ User tests are expensive and
require lengthy implementa-
tion times
■■ The customer aims for a large
technological leap in a short
timeframe
Advanced testing technologies are ideal tools
in optimizing product development.
Arto Sampo
B.Sc. (Machine Design),
M.Sc. (Automation)
Arto Sampo has extensive experi-
ence in production lines and the
design of special devices used in
production in a wide range of indus-
tries. His experience covers design
projects and implementation pro-
jects as well as different product de-
velopment projects since 1981. He
has also taught special courses re-
lated to his fields of expertise at the
Jyväskylä University of Applied Sci-
ences for more than 10 years. Arto
has worked at Elomatic in different
positions since 1990 and his current
position is Business Area Manager,
Production Development Projects.
arto.sampo@elomatic.com
Mika Kuhmonen
Ph.D. (Production Engineering)
Mr Kuhmonen has gained exten-
sive experience of discrete manu-
facturing development internation-
ally and domestically since his M.Sc.
graduation in 1993. He has partici-
pated in numerous factory develop-
ment projects in Europe, USA and
Asia implementing e.g. Lean manu-
facturing, Theory of Constraints on
shop floors and order-delivery pro-
cesses. Mr Kuhmonen has held po-
sitions from production expert to
global development executive and
joined Elomatic in 2010.
mika.kuhmonen@elomatic.com
About the authors
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  8  |  9
Still Going Strong
Heikki Pirilä
– 30 years in starch processing
Making it in the starch process-
ing business requires a keen eye
for raw material quality and the
ability to get the most out of your
raw materials. A general rule of
thumb is: the more refined the
product, the more valuable it be-
comes. The investment payback
time on a starch processing plant
investment is rather long, so pa-
tience and a big wallet come in
handy. The strong and growing
demand for especially modified
starches and valuable by-prod-
ucts is nevertheless enough to
keep long-term investors keen.
The reason is that starch and
starch by-products are omni-
present; they are everywhere you
look, that is as long as you know
what you are looking at.
“One of my clients
once said that starch
processing is second in
complexity only to nuclear
power generation.”
Text: Martin Brink
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  10  |  11
Heikki Pirilä has an eye for starch
and starch by-products. He has
been in the starch processing business
for the better part of three decades, so
there is not much that surprises him
anymore. He started in the business
as a design engineer back in 1984 and
has been involved in all project phases
of starch processing from design, pro-
ject management, supervision and pro-
curement to maintenance.
  His work has seen him travel widely
especially in Eastern Europe and Asia.
His expertise is not limited to success-
fully setting up wheat starch process-
ing plants; throughout the years he has
gained valuable knowledge of raw ma-
terials sourcing regions, cultures and lo-
cal energy sources, particularly in Rus-
sia and China where he has worked
extensively.
Developments
and future trends
Surprisingly little has changed over
the years with regards to how wheat
starch is processed. Development ef-
forts have rather been focused on im-
proving devices and the efficiency of
the process as well as the further pro-
cessing of starch.
  “We have, for example, invented in-
line flour/water mixing, which means
that there is no dough preparation and
no delay before three-phase fraction-
ing. We have also come up with our
own maturing drum and agglomera-
tor to ensure holding times that are op-
timal and even. The system is nearly
fully closed, which means that we use
less fresh water and therefore also pro-
duce less waste water. Due the relative-
ly long payback period it is important to
find ways to reduce the investment and
production costs and make the whole
process more efficient”, explains Heikki.
  Native starch production is in itself
not that attractive and the goal of most
producers is in fact to enhance the pro-
duction of highly valued products such
as gluten and other products made of
starch as well as by-products.
  “I don’t really see native starch pro-
duction as holding much promise, but
there is a definite trend in further pro-
cessing of starch into modified starches,
syrups and sweeteners, organic acids, bi-
oplastics, and biofuels and so on. When
you look at the revenue structure the
reason is very clear. Starch fetches about
€400–450 per tonne and gluten up to
€2,000 per tonne. It’s not rocket science
to figure out where the real money can
be made”, Heikki continues.
  “Another noticeable trend is that
we are not seeing much in the line of
greenfield investments in Western Eu-
rope and for existing plants there is
usually resistance to make significant
process changes. Most investments are
related to the renewal of machines and
reducing the environmental impacts of
production. Eastern Europe, Russia and
Asia are definitely where it is happen-
ing with regards new investments in
wheat starch processing”.
Starch processing is
a challenging business
Wheat starch processing is known as
being rather complex in itself and the
investments required can hinder mar-
ket entrants. Greenfield plants typically
require a 5–7 year payback period.
  “One of my clients once said that
starch processing is second in com-
plexity only to nuclear power genera-
tion”, says Heikki with a smile.
  Investors commonly have to con-
sider the energy dependence of their
processes and energy prices. It can,
however, be difficult to predict the
availability and pricing of energy, es-
pecially in the long-term. A process
that uses vast amounts of energy is
sustainable as long as energy prices
remain fairly low. There is a case to be
made for investing in reducing energy
dependence.
  “Look for example what is happening
in the Ukraine right now. Their energy
prices have doubled in the space of a
few days and it seems more pain is on
the way. Imagine what that increase
does to your bottom line.”
  Raw material quality commonly
changes from year to year and region-
ally. Early germination can, for example
have a profound impact on the Falling
Number, an indicator of the degree of
germination and starch breakdown.
  A further difficulty faced by produc-
ers is choosing their equipment and
devices.
Basic facts about starch and gluten
1.	 Where does starch come from?
Starch is a storable energy source found in all green plants. It is commonly
found in potatoes, maize, wheat, rye, sorghum, barely, triticale, peas, rice
and tapioca
2.	 Where and what is it used for?
Industries: Food Industry, Paper and Cardboard Industry, Textiles, Chemi-
cals, Pharmaceuticals
Food Industry: beverages, sweets, chocolates, baking products, biscuits,
desserts, canned fruit, food thickeners and stabilizers.
3.	 What by-products are produced?
Biotech products: citric acid, glutamate, lactic acid, syrup, lysine
Biofuels: biogas, bioethanol, biobutanol
Feed: for cattle, pigs and poultry in dry and/or slurry form
4.	 What is gluten and where is it used?
Gluten is a very valuable product of wheat starch processing. Gluten is a
key ingredient in bread products. It makes dough elastic and helps the
bread to rise and keep its shape. It also provides the chewy texture as-
sociated with doughnuts and bread. Gluten is also used in cosmetics, hair
products and dermatological products.
  “There is great variance in the price
and quality of devices. Due to the long
payback period there is an ever pre-
sent temptation to expedite the pay-
back period by reducing device pro-
curement costs. Facilities can run up
to 30 years or even more if maintained
properly, but inferior quality devices
will usually fail no matter how well they
are maintained. It is a fine balance that
needs to be struck between the short-
term financing needs and life-time
costs. In most cases it is a good idea
to consult with an independent con-
sultant to find the optimal solution”,
says Heikki.
Staying on top
So what does it take to be successful in
this business area?
  “It probably sounds like I am stat-
ing the obvious, but a crucial element
is the ability to make maximum use of
your raw materials and to run the pro-
cess as optimally as possible. Producers
that can efficiently produce the high-
est quality A-starch, gluten and valua-
ble by-products and seamlessly deliver
them to the market will always have a
competitive edge. Efficiency gains can
also be achieved by reducing energy
and fresh water consumption”, Heikki
eludes.
  Proximity to the source of raw ma-
terials and good knowledge of local
and regional conditions, cultures and
infrastructure are also very important
factors. Keeping a watch on market
developments and predicting which
products will do well in future are fur-
ther key success factors.
  “This is not an easy business, but we
do know that the demand for starch
and starch by-products remains strong
and is increasing. The customers are
out there and they will be there for the
foreseeable future. Is my job to help my
customers to be successful and put my
30 years’ experience at their disposal”,
Heikki concludes.
▲▲ The maturing drum and agglomera-
tor ensures that holding times are op-
timal and even.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  12  |  13
There are many reasons why flue
gas scrubber technology should be
used. One of the most important is
the financial benefits it brings. An
immeasurable amount of fully uti-
lisable thermal energy vanishes into
the sky through the chimneys of
heating plants every day. A modern
flue gas scrubber can recover any
lost heat and offers effective parti-
cle filtration for heating companies.
Changes in the district heating mar-
ket in Europe place many heating
plant companies in a challenging posi-
tion. There are several diverse reasons
for these changes. Competition over
heating customers has become signifi-
cantly fiercer over the past ten years as
competing forms of heating have be-
come more popular. The fuel strategies
for district heating production in dif-
ferent countries are tied to changes in
energy reserves and production in the
EU and to the entire global economy.
  District heating networks are usu-
ally old and consumers have inade-
quate heat exchangers with poor rates
of efficiency. In addition, upgrading
production plants to meet the cur-
rent energy efficiency and emission
requirements often depends on mu-
nicipal economies, which may delay or
even prevent the completion of finan-
cially and environmentally productive
investments.
  In order to modernise district heat-
ing production, we must turn our eyes
to financially reasonable small-scale
investment projects that serve to in-
crease the energy efficiency of heat
production and limit the emissions of
plants to cost-efficiently meet the cur-
rent requirements.
Fuel oil is a financial burden
for heating companies
The majority of heating companies
still use heavy fuel oil. Fuel oil is con-
sumed especially during periods of ex-
treme cold, when primary production
plants do not have sufficient capacity.
In many cases, the additional need for
Modern flue gas scrubbers
– significant improvements in the profitability of bioenergy heating plants
heat leads to significant fuel oil con-
sumption, even during shorter spells of
cold weather. According to our experi-
ence, a typical energy volume of 3,500–
6,000 MWh a year is produced using
fuel oil in heating companies with sol-
id fuel plants of 5–10 MW. Most fuel oil
is consumed in cold weather during
the winter.
  In addition, heavy fuel oil is used to
compensate for the stoppage and main-
tenance of solid fuel boilers. In summer,
solid fuel plants run at the lower limits
of their adjustment range where such
plants are difficult to operate. The dis-
trict heat required is then produced us-
ing oil or natural gas boilers.
  Most heating companies are trying
to stop the use of heavy fuel oil. Their
reasons are financially and socially sen-
sible: the use of heavy fuel oil is simply
too expensive and has much higher
carbon dioxide emissions that local bi-
ofuels.
Flue gas scrubbing
and recovery of lost heat
A flue gas scrubber is a wet scrubber
which was originally designed to re-
duce particle emissions from flue gas-
es. Over time, its development has
shifted to improving the recovery of
lost heat from flue gases. The particle
filtration and heat recovery properties
of a traditional flue gas scrubber are
based on two consecutive and con-
nected processing stages. Flue gas-
es are led through a scrubbing phase
where the majority of small particles
are removed. During the same phase,
flue gases are cooled down to their wet
temperature (60–70 °C).
  After the scrubbing stage, flue gas-
es are conveyed to a condenser where
they release their thermal energy
through condensation in water circu-
lating against the current. Condensa-
tion takes place in filler layers (one or
two layers) that act as heat transfer sur-
faces in the process. Circulated water
(i.e. generated condensate) is led to
the heat exchanger where the thermal
energy transferred to the condensate is
recovered in the district heating water.
(See Figure 1.)
DH inlet
DH outlet
Flue gas
Flue
gas
▲▲ Figure 1. A simplified traditional scrub-
ber process diagram
The use of flue gas scrubber technology can
bring tangible financial benefits.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  14  |  15
It is essential
to reach the dew point
in the condensation zone
The dew point refers to the tempera-
ture at which the relative humidity of
the vapour contained by the flue gas
is 100%. If the temperature falls below
the dew point, the vapour contained
by the flue gas begins to condensate,
i.e. turn into water. When analysing the
transfer of thermal energy, we can see
that, in connection with different phase
transitions of water, enthalpic changes
are significantly higher than in temper-
ature changes within a single phase.
Therefore, there are significant trans-
fers of thermal energy through water
vaporisation and vapour condensation
(2,350 kJ/kg).
  However, the most important factor
in heat recovery is that the tempera-
ture is below the dew point when the
flue gas vapour condensates and the
released thermal energy can efficient-
ly access the circulated water and, ulti-
mately, the heat exchanger.
  On the other hand, if the tempera-
ture is significantly above the conden-
sation point in the scrubber, the heat
recovery capacity falls and the scrub-
ber will, in the worst case scenario, act
as an evaporator. To put it simply, the
scrubber vaporises additional water
into flue gases. (See Figure 2.)
Why does a normal flue gas
scrubber not work
in extreme cold?
Reaching the condensation point tem-
perature in any situation is essential
considering the scrubber’s heat re-
covery. Return district heating water
is conducted to the secondary side
of the scrubber’s heat exchangers. It
cools the flue gases below the dew
point temperature. Cooling works and
the dew point can be achieved if the
district heating network’s return wa-
ter temperature remains clearly below
the condensation point temperature
of the flue gas.
  During peak power periods, the aim
is to use a high-quality (i.e. dry) fuel. The
flue gases of a dry fuel are dry, mean-
ing that the dew point is low. During
peak loads, the return temperatures of
district heating networks increase. The
primary reason for this is that the heat
exchangers used in households have
poor efficiency ratios. They simply can-
not transfer the heat required to house-
holds; instead, extra heat returns back
to the heating plant.
  When this excess heat is fed back to
the flue gas scrubber’s heat exchang-
ers, the dew point cannot be reached
and heat recovery decreases signifi-
cantly. In other words, the scrubber’s
heat recovery capacity collapses. Any
missing condensation also causes
problems with sludge and clogging in
the scrubber.
Significant improvements
in heat recovery through
a heat pump connection
Heat pumps have been used in indus-
trial applications for decades in various
recovery processes for waste heat. A
heating plant process is a special case
where a correct heat pump connection
boosts the recovery process four- or
eightfold compared with a traditional
scrubber. The heat pump regulates the
return temperature of district heating
►► Figure 3. The effect of a scrubber solu-
tion with a heat pump connector on a
selected heating plant’s heat produc-
tion duration curve
◄◄ Figure 2. Wet scrubber thermal energy
transfer per fuel power unit as a func-
tion of flue gas temperature
Fluegaspowerdelivered,kW/MWpa
Flue gas temperature, °C
Flue gas cooling
Flue gas condensation
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Flue gas dew point
Fuel moisture content 50%
Residual oxygen 5% vol. in dry flue gas
Flue gas initial temperature
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
Wood chips
Peat
water led to the scrubber so that the
condensation point can be reached re-
gardless of the network load and other
external conditions.
  In a traditional scrubber, the return
temperature forces the final flue gas
temperature to be 3–5 °C higher than
the return temperature. For example,
if the return temperature is 55 °C, the
minimum final temperature of flue gas-
es can be 58 °C.
  Using a heat pump connection, the
return temperature of district heat-
ing water can be reduced by 20 °C, in
which case, according to the previous
example, the return temperature of dis-
trict heating water would be 35 °C and
the minimum final temperature of flue
gases would be 38 °C.
  However, the thermal energy of the
return water is not lost in the cooling
process. It is transferred to the con-
denser via the pump’s thermal sub-
stance and returned to the district
heating network. The energy trans-
ferred using the heat pump simply
passes the scrubber connection.
  In more advanced applications, only
the exact volume of the network’s re-
turn water needed by the scrubber
is conducted, in which case the heat
pump can be dimensioned optimally
for the investment.
  In the aforementioned example, ad-
ditional cooling of 20 °C is significant
considering the recovery of energy. If
peat with a humidity of 35% was used
as a fuel and the residual oxygen of
the flue gases was 5% by volume, the
flue gas dew point temperature would
have been 57 °C. In such cases, a tradi-
tional scrubber cannot reach the dew
point, which means that additional wa-
ter is needed in the process.
  The regulatory circuit and heat
pump connection described above
enable a significant increase in the
scrubber’s heat recovery capacity and
improve the heating plant’s energy ef-
ficiency, especially in extreme cold.
  The use of heavy fuel oil can be re-
duced significantly, which guarantees
a short payback time for investments.
Currently, payback times of even 2–3
years have been reached in invest-
ments where heavy fuel oil has been
replaced by a scrubber solution with a
heat pump connection. (See Figure 3.)
About the authors
Juha Järvenreuna
M.Sc. (Automation Systems)
Juha Järvenreuna started as the CEO
of Caligo Industria Oy in August
2013. He has mainly worked at Tel-
este Oyj in management positions
in production, product develop-
ment and product and service oper-
ations. In addition, Juha has worked
at DHL International Oy and Nokia
Networks Oy. The majority of his
work experience has been gained in
international operations.
juha.jarvenreuna@caligoindustria.com
Mika Nummila
M.Sc. (Energy Engineering)
Mika Nummila has worked in con-
sultancy and design tasks in process
and energy engineering since 1993.
In 2005–2012, Nummila worked as
a design manager in the process in-
dustry at Elomatic Oy, being respon-
sible for the Jyväskylä unit’s pro-
cess department. Since 2013, he has
worked as a technology manager at
Caligo Industria Oy. Nummila spe-
cialises in heat transfer, energy effi-
ciency and flue gas scrubbers.
mika.nummila@caligoindustria.com
Thermalpower,MW
Time, h
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Boiler + scrubber
Boiler
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  16  |  17
Virtualisation
of automation
systems
– a brave new world
Photo©AndrewOstrovsky/depositphotos.com
Automation has developed at a
rapid pace in recent times. The
surge in development has seen
automation suppliers and com-
ponent manufacturers for pro-
cess control launch new genera-
tions of process controllers and
bus and I/O components on the
market. The use of ICT technology
and databases has increased in
distributed control system (DCS).
This increasing use dictates that
we to come up with new ways of
efficiently utilising the compu-
tational power and opportuni-
ties computers present. ICT virtu-
alisation can achieve significant
savings in the delivery of auto-
mation systems and in produc-
ing high levels of system flexibil-
ity and usability.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  18  |  19
Virtualisation refers to the use of
virtual computers in one or more
servers, the physical resources of which
are jointly used by the virtual comput-
ers with the use of virtualisation soft-
ware (Hypervisor). A virtual machine is
a program-based object which corre-
sponds to a physical computer in terms
of logic and functionality.
  Usually the end user uses a virtual
machine via a terminal which is con-
nected through a remote connec-
tion, such as Remote Desktop Proto-
col (RDP). Virtualisation technology has
rapidly become popular in the IT office
environment and is currently finding a
home in ITC process automation.
  Development work and tests con-
ducted at Elomatic on the use of vir-
tualisation technology in automation
systems indicate that ICT virtualisation
is indeed possible and the results are
very promising.
  The development team’s vision of
an implementation strategy for auto-
mation systems is depicted in Figure
2. It shows the most essential parts
of the DCS implementation with the
use of virtualisation. The device imple-
mentation differs from that shown in
Figure 1 because the usability require-
ments differ between the Demilitarized
Zone (DMZ) and Process Control Net-
work (PCN). This has an impact on du-
plication, which means that a single
blade server can be used in the DMZ.
In the PCN, a cluster needs to be built
of separate servers and Network Added
Storage (NAS) drives located in differ-
ent places. The DCS servers of a large
ship’s control system and other critical
IT components are, for example, locat-
ed in different parts of the ship.
More licences but less hardware
A basic cost analysis has shown that
in virtualised systems the share of li-
cences increases and that of hardware
decreases. The reason is that the man-
agement of a virtualisation solution re-
quires a new software platform and
software licences. A redundant NAS im-
plementation, for example, requires not
only special hardware, but also soft-
ware for a high availability (HA) net-
work drive. See Figure 3.
  In virtualised systems several com-
puters and servers are replaced by a
few more powerful servers and op-
erator terminals, so that the quantity
equals the number of desktop comput-
ers. In addition to software and hard-
ware changes, the system changes in
terms of management, maintenance,
usability and its expandability. For ex-
ample, the migration of a virtual ma-
chine is only possible in a virtual envi-
ronment, and the use of migration in
maintenance improves flexibility and
efficiency. In other words, the diversity
of the new system structure improves
efficiency and user-friendliness.
Total cost ownership (TCO)
The total cost of ownership for the au-
tomation life cycle plays an important
role when analysing the use of virtuali-
sation technology. The initial costs may
be higher, but no further hardware and
software upgrades are required for the
automation system, which means that
▼▼ Figure 1. A common distributed con-
trol system (DCS) implementation
Operator Stations Operator StationsApplication Station
DCS Servers
DCS Process Controllers QCS Controller
Ethernet
3rd
party Process Controllers
ServersOPC
2xCPU CPU CPU CPU CPUPower Power Power Power PowerI/O I/O I/O I/O I/O
QCS
Advanced
Control
3rd
party
Enterprise Network
DMZ
PCN
About the author
Vladimir Pöyhönen
B.Sc. (Automation and ICT)
Vladimir Pöyhönen joined Elomatic
in 2012 and works as an Automation
Expert at the Elomatic Helsinki of-
fice. He is specialised in automation,
ICT, virtualisation and marine auto-
mation integration. Before joining
Elomatic Vladimir worked at Pöyry
in instrumentation and project co-
ordination and at Honeywell in sales
support and project management.
vladimir.poyhonen@elomatic.com
▼▼ Figure 3. StarWind iSCSI NAS imple-
mentation
▲▲ Figure 2. DCS implementation concept
with use of virtualisation
the TCO is significantly lower than that
of a traditional implementation.
  This factor cannot be ignored, and
as a result, large automation suppli-
ers have, in recent years started to of-
fer partly-virtualised solutions. Honey-
well stands out from other suppliers as it
also offers HA solutions for virtualisation.
This technology guarantees flexible and
cost-effective automation deliveries.
  Automation companies need to
keep up with the changing world. Vir-
tualisation expertise and specialisation
delivers far superior benefits compared
with traditional approaches. It provides
companies that embrace these tech-
nologies with a clear advantage as they
are able to serve their customers in an
entirely new way, for example, in auto-
mation system procurement and im-
plementation. Learning new concepts
as well as developing and applying
what was learnt are vital skills in the
modern world.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  20  |  21
Safety is a topic on everyone’s lips.
When users make a mistake or in-
terpret a critical matter incorrect-
ly, they may hurt themselves or
damage the environment. The root
cause of an incident may be non-
compliance with instructions, incor-
rectly remembered procedures or
a lack of attention – i.e. a human er-
ror. By analysing the working envi-
ronment more closely, an error can
sometimes be revealed as the result
of logical thinking or foreseeable ac-
tions, which could have been avoid-
ed if the working environment had
been well designed.
Agood working environment is
comprehensible, where users,
such as control room operators, can
easily obtain the information they need
from the environment and user inter-
faces, interpret it and act correctly. In
fact, the user interface in itself should
act as a guideline structure, providing
instructions for correct working pro-
cedures. This is affected by the design
of different elements in the working
environment, and the logicality, con-
sistency and informativeness of user
interfaces.
  Separate instructions and signs are
usually necessary, but all too often fail-
ures in design are patched up by sim-
ply providing additional instructions.
This type of working environment
stresses employees unnecessarily. If the
environment is not intuitive to users,
i.e. naturally understandable, it places
a strain on perception and memory ca-
pacity and causes inference difficulties.
Because a human’s brainwork-related
cognitive capacity is limited, there is a
greater risk of human error occurring.
Human errors
– are they avoidable?
Errors made by users can be divided
roughly into two groups. We all make
faulty choices and deductions every
now and then, even if the correct so-
lution is clearly observable and easily
interpreted. Preventing these kinds of
errors is practically impossible.
  However, there is another group of
situations where users need to act re-
lying excessively on their memory, or
Humanerrors
– usability as a safety factor in working environments
Photo 2014 © Depositphotos.com/ndoeljindoel
so that a feature in the environment or
user interface activates the wrong op-
erating model. This latter group of er-
rors can be affected by the design of
the working environment.
  Working environments and their
user interfaces should progress logical-
ly for their users and be consistent for
the actions required. Instead of using
technical language, information should
be understandable to users. This also
refers to the use of clear and under-
standable symbols.
  In order to be in control of their
work, users need to receive correctly
timed feedback from the systems they
are using. Working should not strain
our short-term memory, also known
as working memory, to an unreason-
ably high extent. Separate instructions
are needed in many cases but written
instructions are not an efficient means
to patch up defective usability found
in user interfaces. We should first think
how users could be guided towards
the correct action by developing user
interface features without resorting to
separate instructions.
Safer working
through usability design
In a technical sense, we are working
hard to make the working environment
safe. Examples include the Atex safety
requirements set for safety-critical envi-
ronments, which define technical solu-
tions and material choices acceptable
for various categories of work premises.
Similarly, machine safety regulations
include a large group of requirements
related to various sorts of protection.
  Technically speaking, we can never
build a completely safe working envi-
ronment. For example, gaps need to be
left in automatic safety mechanisms in
the process industry. There are many
areas and situations where operators
need to be able to make decisions and
have an impact on the process. Emer-
gency states are a completely separate
area in this regard.
  When planning working environ-
ments, safety-critical ones in particu-
lar, we need to see people as human
actors. In practical development pro-
jects, the user’s point of view and hu-
man factors are coupled with technical
design and user interface design.
  The design is also tested with end
users before the final implementation
stage. In other words, procedures of
user psychology and system usability
supplement technical safety solutions.
They form a single layer in a “sieve”,
which serves to prevent critical errors
and verify safe operations. Working en-
vironments can be developed control-
lably when the user perspective is con-
sidered throughout the design process.
  There are ways to reduce human er-
ror. Through working environment and
user interface design, we can have an
impact on the probability and frequen-
cy of unintentional errors being made.
About the author
Harri Hytönen
B.Sc. (Wellness Technology)
Harri Hytönen graduated as an engi-
neer from the Wellness Technology
degree programme at the Jyväsky-
lä University of Applied Sciences
in 2002. After graduating, he has
worked in research and develop-
ment in the field of user-centred de-
sign, and as an educator. He has ex-
perience in product documentation
and quality and development engi-
neering. In addition to his engineer’s
degree, he has a degree in the de-
sign field. Currently, Hytönen works
at Elomatic as a product engineer in
charge of usability.
harri.hytonen@elomatic.com
A good working environment is comprehensible,
where users can easily obtain information,
interpret it and act correctly.
Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/DmitryKalinovsky
Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/Uatp12
Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/RobertGerhardt
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  22  |  23
Air tightness testing
  for biosafety level 3
In search of an international standard
and sound practice
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  22  |  23
All bio-containment guidelines and
inspection documents set require-
ments for airtight containment
boundaries around biohazards.
Current international containment
guidelines only scratch the surface
for biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) and the
available tests proposed are not
entirely suitable for such facilities.
Some steps in the right direction
have been taken, notably as out-
lined in the standards put forth in
the Australia-New Zealand mod-
el for their Physical Containment 3
designation.
©2013WavebreakMediaLtd
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  24  |  25
There are several reasons why air-
tight containment boundaries are
required, the most obvious of which
is that they prevent the escape of air-
borne biohazards. A much less obvious
function is that they also prevent the
escape of the decontamination gases
or vapours used. These gases and va-
pours are, in fact, the most likely dan-
gerous airborne agents.
  Key questions regarding what ex-
actly constitutes acceptable leakage
levels, however, have to be answered
before quantitative testing can be-
come the standard. Until then qualita-
tive methods will see continued use.
  One of the principle requirements
of BSL-3 is ensuring inward airflow into
a contained area from a less contained
area. This can generally be achieved
by maintaining the facility under neg-
ative pressure with respect to the at-
mosphere, using two interlocked door
airlocks at the containment bounda-
ries and pressure cascading, etc. The
effectiveness of all measures depends
directly on the integrity of the room /
facility.
  Guidance with regards BSL-3 con-
tainment barrier integrity is relatively
superficially provided by the“Biosafety
in Microbiological and Biomedical Lab-
oratories”(BMBL) guidelines. According
to the BMBL‘surfaces should be sealed’
and‘openings should be capable of be-
ing sealed to facilitate space decon-
tamination’. In addition, there are no
criteria for verifying that these condi-
tions have been met in the BMBL or in
any official certification BSL-3 checklist.
Pressure Decay Test not suitable
for BSL-3 validation
Methods to validate the air leakage of
a containment boundary can be clas-
sified into two main categories: quali-
tative and quantitative. The only quan-
titative test prescribed in the U.S. and
Canada is the Pressure Decay Test.
However, the Pressure Decay Test is
not well suited to BSL-3 performance
validation.
  The Pressure Decay Test is an ex-
treme test in that it represents the
highest standard for room integrity in
the U.S. and Canada. It is designed for
BSL-3Ag/BSL-4 containment construc-
tion validation, which is historically
constructed with specialized and very
expensive high performance contain-
ment barrier systems. Typical methods
for constructing a BSL-3 space will not
pass the Pressure Decay Test criteria
and the risks associated with aerosol
hazards in a BSL-3 space do not war-
rant constructing barriers that will pass
this test either.
  Without a relevant quantitative test
to use, the most common methods
of testing BSL-3 barriers are qualitative
tests designed to find and fix holes in
the barrier. That is pretty sound logic
overall, but the devil is in the details
and in how one records those details
in the course of a construction project.
Identifying air leakage
The two most common methods of
identifying air leaks are smoke testing
and soap bubble testing. Regrettably,
there is no guidance or consensus on
what parameters should be used to
perform these tests. The parameters
have to be defined on a case by case
basis via laboratory operations and fail-
ure scenarios.
◄◄ Room impermeability tests
10 000 000
1 000 000
100 000
10 000
1000
100
10
1
0,1
0,01
AAHL
Canadian
USDA
Value of Leakage Coefficient – Beta (m³/Pa.s)
AirLeakageRate(l/min)at200Pa
1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 1.0E-08 1.0E-09
Recommended maximum PC3-PC4
leakage rate
Negative pressure
flexible film isolator
Recommended: 	Desired BSL-3/4 range for Australian facilities
USDA: 	 Desired rate for BSL-3Ag facilities
Canadian: 	 National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg (BSL-3Ag, BSL-4)
AAHL: 	 Australian Animal Health Center, Geelong (BSL-3Ag)
▼▼ Air leakage rates at 200 Pa differential pressure
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  26  |  27
AS/NZS 2243.3:2010
guidelines
The only current quantitative tests in
practice for BSL-3 have been devel-
oped in Australia and New Zealand for
their Physical Containment 3 (PC3) des-
ignation. These tests are relatively sim-
ple to execute and do not subject con-
tainment level 3 rooms to pressures
they are not designed to withstand.
(Level 3 rooms are tested at 0.8”200 Pa
pressure difference.)
  The standard has been developed
to set acceptable leakage rates appro-
priate for containment level 3 that are
achievable with common construc-
tion systems, i.e. drywall or sandwich
panel constructions with appropriate
penetration details. Careful attention
to joints and penetrations is required
for the rooms to pass the test. Normal
workmanship for non-containment
spaces will not suffice. Spaces that pass
the test criteria are considered capable
of gaseous fumigation and secondary
containment protection.
  Details regarding tests for leak tight-
ness (BSL-3Ag and BSL-3) and the room
leak tightness test (Pressure Decay test
BSL-3AG) are provided in tables 1 and 2.
Practical difficulties and limitations
of current testing methods
Acceptance criteria for all leakage test-
ing methods are defined for single
rooms with sturdy constructions, a lim-
ited number of penetrations (for duct-
ing, electrical cables, doors, view panels
etc.) and airtight view panels as well as
airtight doors.
  It is feasible to qualify of single room
laboratory or one animal room with air-
tight doors, but if you are testing a BSL-
3 laboratory facility that consists of sev-
eral laboratory rooms connected with
a BSL-3 corridor, the laboratory door is
not airtight. The doors on a BSL-3 con-
tainment barrier are airtight, but inter-
nal doors normally leak. While testing
for leakage, single rooms with leaking
doors need to be qualified. The accept-
ance criteria cannot be met unless the
non-airtight door/doors is/are sealed
with adhesive tape or sealant.
  For large rooms with multiple doors,
large surface areas and several pen-
etrations it is difficult to fulfil the ac-
ceptance criteria. It is necessary to de-
fine the acceptance criteria in terms
of litres/min per square meters of the
room’s surface area.
  In pressure decay testing the test is
sensitive to changes in the ambient
temperature during the course of the
test. Therefore, an appropriate correc-
tion factor has to be applied that con-
siders the temperature before and af-
ter the test.
  The Australia-New Zealand model
(AS/NZS 2243.3:2010) provides a com-
mon approach and platform for de-
signers, builders, and owners to en-
gage, deliver, and qualify the facility.
The standard is meant to ensure that
containment laboratories are designed
and constructed to perform their
functions safely and consistently, to
a standard that is deemed appropri-
ate and fit for the purpose by an inde-
pendent body.
  The Australia-New Zealand model
can be improved upon with a more
evidence-based rationale for perfor-
mance requirements. What level of air
leakage at a given pressure correlates
to a safe measure of containing haz-
ardous gases in likely scenarios? Is the
acceptable leakage amount depend-
ant on room volume or the same for
all room sizes? Answering these ques-
tions, as well as identifying the relation-
ship of airtightness to the reduction in
The basic procedure for room air
leakage testing under negative pres-
sure for BSL-3Ag and BSL-3 according
to AS/NZS 2243.3:2010 is as follows:
  Air leakage can be quantified by
using an equilibrium pressure/flow
test. For smaller rooms a vacuum
cleaner connected to the supply or
exhaust duct by a hose and a control
valve can be used. For larger rooms a
blower may be required.
1.	 This test usually involves the intro-
duction of clean, dry compressed
air into the space while monitoring
the pressure in the space through
separate pressure tapping (a vac-
uum cleaner with a hose and inte-
grated anemometer could be used
for low leakage rates).
2.	 When the pressure is stabilized at
the required test pressure (200 Pa),
the inflow of air required to main-
tain this pressure is measured us-
ing a flow meter such as a variable
gap meter.
3.	 The leakage is then recorded in li-
tres per minute.
4.	 Prior to the test care needs to be
taken to ensure that all sources
of air or gas pressure within the
space are isolated. Doors should be
taped with PVC tape and physically
restrained to prevent movement
under the positive room pressure.
This test can also be performed by
extracting air from the room, thus
placing the room under negative
pressure.
Acceptance criteria
Leakage must be < 20 litres per min-
ute for BSL 3Ag, and < 200 litres per
minute for BSL 3. All instruments
should be appropriately calibrated
by an accredited laboratory.
Table 1: Leak tightness testing – BSL-3Ag and BSL-3
risk of airborne pathogen release, even
in a qualified way, would take us a long
way towards setting a standard that is
rational and defendable and which will
satisfy industrial, regulatory, and public
interests.
  Until that exists, we can do what is
reasonable to ensure sound and ap-
propriate laboratories, which I believe
means qualitative testing with well-
considered test protocols based on
what the laboratory is intended for. As
we perform these tests and share the
outcomes we will build a common ap-
proach and standard that will begin
to standardize this important contain-
ment protective measure.
References
1.	 Australian/New Zealand Standard
per AS/NZS 2243.3:2010
2.	 Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories – U.S. De-
partment of Health and Human Ser-
vices
About the author
Milind Shinde
B.E. (Mechanical Engineering)
Milind Shinde has over 10 years’ex-
perience in Pharmaceutical and Bi-
opharmaceutical projects. He has
conceptualized and executed many
projects for protein purification, vac-
cines, OSD, LVP, sterile API and for-
mulation, as well as fill & finish. Over
the past 10 years, he has worked
with prestigious organizations such
as Reliance Life Sciences and with
leading consultancy firms executing
projects, among others, for Baxter
(USA), ShreyaLife Sciences, Reliance
Pharmaceuticals, DaburPharmaceu-
ticals. He currently works as a pro-
ject manager at Elomatic Pharmalab
Consulting & Engineering Pvt. Ltd in
Mumbai, India.
milind.shinde@elomatic.com
“Until a rational and defendable standard exists
we can only do what is reasonable to ensure
sound and appropriate laboratories.”
For pretesting, an initial pressure of
125 to 250 Pa is recommended to
identify major leaks.
  For certification the basic proce-
dure for room pressure decay test-
ing under negative pressure is as fol-
lows:
1.	 Isolate the area by closing and se-
curing all doors, valves and bub-
ble tight dampers at the contain-
ment barrier (avoid temporary
sealing measures indoors, win-
dows and services that would cov-
er permanent seals); plug all pres-
sure sensor lines, e.g. magnehelic
gauges.
2.	 Install a calibrated inclined ma-
nometer across the containment
barrier so that it is not affected by
air distribution. The minimum ac-
curacy of the manometer should
be 10 Pa (0.05 in. w.g.) and capable
of reading pressure up to 750 Pa.
3.	 Install a ball valve in the piping be-
tween the vacuum pump/fan and
the room to allow the room to be
sealed once the test pressure has
been attained.
4.	 Connect a vacuum source to the
room and create a 500 Pa nega-
tive pressure differential; allow the
room to stabilize and close the
valve between the vacuum pump/
fan and the room to seal room at
500 Pa.
5.	 Dynamically trend pressure loss
starting at 500 Pa negative pres-
sure differentials; record the dif-
ferential pressure at 1 minute in-
tervals for 20 minutes.
6.	 If repeat test is required, allow for
a 20 minute waiting period.
7.	 Disconnect the vacuum pump/fan
and open the ball valve slowly to
allow room pressure to return to
normal.
Acceptance criteria
Two consecutive tests with a mini-
mum 250 Pa (1 in.w.g.) loss of pres-
sure from an initial 500 Pa (2 in.
w.g.) over a 20 minute period. All in-
struments should be appropriately
calibrated by an accredited labora-
tory.
Table 2: Room leak tightness test (Pressure Decay test BSL 3Ag)
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  28  |  29
The need for the contained handling
and processing of pharmaceutical
materials and pathogens is on the
rise due to the increased focus on
health and safety and the growing
interest in the development of High
Potency Active Pharmaceutical In-
gredients (HPAPIs). A wide range of
containment equipment is available
on the market to meet the process-
ing and operational needs of devel-
opment and manufacturing. Select-
ing suitable equipment, however,
requires an in-depth understand-
ing of containment aspects in order
to avoid operational hazards and
large capital investments resulting
from an ‘oversizing’ approach.
In containment equipment selection
the focus is on preventing the per-
sonnel from being exposed to hazard-
ous substances. The equipment can-
not, however, fully prevent exposure. It
is thus important to ensure that expo-
sure through containment equipment
over the operational course of time is
less than the product/pharmaceutical
material exposure limit.
  The selection of suitable contain-
ment equipment requires a thorough
understanding of product and equip-
ment related exposure limits.
Product exposure limit
The product exposure limit is defined
in terms of the occupational expo-
sure limit (OEL), which is calculated
based on the No Observable Effect
Level (NOEL). The NOEL value is ob-
tained by testing the pharmaceutical
material on the species with daily dos-
age increases until the observable ef-
fect or reaction can be seen. The OEL
can thus be calculated with the fol-
lowing formula:
OEL =
NOEL × BW
V × SF1 × SF2
OEL: Occupational exposure limit
NOEL: No Observable Effect Level
BW: Body weight of the humans
V: Volume of breath per human per day
(8–10m³/8-hour of shift)
SF1 and SF2: Safety factors for estab-
lishing a correlation between species
and individuals if data for the humans
is not available.
Containment Engineering
– A systematic approach to handle highly potent active ingredients and pathogens
◄◄ Figure 1. Containment is the isolation
of a product or pharmaceutical ma-
terials from personnel and the envi-
ronment or vice versa with the use of
a physical barrier.
▼▼ Figure 2. The appropriate contain-
ment system for each process is based
on the quantity of materials, the occu-
pation health hazard posed, the dura-
tion of the task and the physical form
the handled materials.
Containedbarrier
Product Area
Product Protection
Personnel Area
Environmental Area
Product
Containedbarrier
Product Area
Personnel/Environmental Protection
Personnel Area
Environmental Area
Product
Moderate isolation
e.g. down flow booths or
high containment screens
Open system
e.g. engineered ventilation
High isolation
e.g. barrier isolators
Closed system
e.g. barrier isolators or RABS
Quantity
Kilograms Maximum
Milligrams Minimum
Highly disperseSlurry
Task duration
Exposure risk
Occupational hazard
Agglomerated
Physical form
Mild/reversible Severe/irreversible
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  30  |  31
Equipment exposure limit
The exposure limit of the equipment
can only be determined through air
sampling procedures and then ana-
lysing the collected airborne particle
samples. This amount is then divided
by the volume of air sampled and the
sampling time to give the Time Weight-
ed Average (TWA) values of the expo-
sure limit.
  The TWA for evaluating pharmaceu-
tical material is defined for 15 min as
the Short Term Time Weighted Aver-
age (STTWA) and for 8 hours as the
Long Term Time Weighted Average
(LTTWA).
Correlation between
OEL and TWA
Containment equipment needs be de-
signed or selected in order to achieve
LTTWA < OEL. The LTTWA can also be
obtained from the STTWA considering
the actual exposure time in the opera-
tional shifts. For example, the general
industrial shift duration is 8 hours and
the STTWA values for an exposure time
of 15 min are available, then LTTWA
based on STTWA can be calculated as
follows.
LTTWA =
STTWA
× NoC × DF
32
TWA: Time Weighted Average
LTTWA: Long Term TWA
STTWA: Short Term TWA
NoC: Number of cycles
DF: Dilution Factor
▼▼ Table 1: Isolation methods
Particulars Down Flow Booths
High Containment
Screens
Restricted Barrier
Access Systems (RABS)
Barrier Isolators
Flow
direction
Unidirectional flow
through ceiling HEPA
NA
Flow through clean room
air circulation system or
dedicated air filtration
and conditioning system
Uncompromised continu-
ous flow through supply
and return HEPA of dedi-
cated air filtration and
conditioning system
OEL levels
of material
handled
Highest High Moderate Least
Health
Hazard level
Mild Moderate High Severe
Level of
Isolation
Least Moderate High Highest
Level of
Automation
Least NA High Highest
Application
Effective protection when
handling dusty material.
Effective way of boasting
down flow booth capa-
bilities.
Physical barrier between
operators and produc-
tion areas but barrier is
limited.
Uncompromised con-
tinuous isolation of its
interior and external en-
vironment, including sur-
rounding clean room and
personnel.
Air flow carries the mate-
rial away from the breath-
ing zone of the operator
into the low exhaust grill.
Effective solution for air
suits due to operational
constraints.
System’s interior atmos-
phere can be controlled
however pressure control
is limited.
Effective pressure control
in the interior of the sys-
tem.
Classification
Recirculatory Booths
Once Through Booths
NA
Passive Open RABS Ac-
tive Open RABS Pas-
sive Closed RABS Active
Closed RABS
Positive Isolator
Negative Isolator
NA: Not Applicable
HEPA: High Efficiency Particulate Filter
A factor of 32 is used as there are four
cycles of 15 minutes in an hour and
the dilution factors is available data
for STTWA for a 100% concentration
of pharmaceutical material.
  The containment equipment should
as such be selected so that LTTWA is
lower than the product-specific OEL.
Equipment evaluation
The selected equipment can be evalu-
ated by considering a worst case sce-
nario where LTTWA = OEL and then
calculating the STTWArequired from the
aforementioned formula as follows:
STTWArequired =
OEL × 32
NoC × DF
TWA: Time Weighted Average
STTWA: Short Term TWA
NoC: Number of cycles
DF: Dilution Factor
The containment equipment can then
be physically tested through appro-
priate methods to evaluate the fol-
lowing:
STTWA < STTWArequired
Methods of isolation
and selection
As indicated earlier the OEL of phar-
maceutical materials is the basis for
the selection of the containment level
required for processing the material.
Thus, as the OEL limit shows a tenden-
cy towards lower values a more sophis-
ticated level of isolation is required to
carry out the safe processing of the
pharmaceutical material.
  The different types of isolation meth-
ods available are provided in Table 1.
The appropriate isolation method is se-
lected based on the criticality of the
material handled or processed. In es-
sence it is based on the OEL, the physi-
cal characteristics of the materials, the
quantity handled and the duration of
pharmaceutical material processing.
See Figure 2 on page 29.
Proper selection and meeting
owner’s requirements
HPAPI is currently one of the fastest
growing segments in the pharmaceu-
tical industry, with a growth rate of 8
to 10 per cent. This high growth rate
is attributed to their application in the
formulation of high potent drugs used
to combat some of the severest dis-
eases. The market opportunities and
treatment capabilities have resulted in
the increased interest shown by phar-
maceutical companies in investing in
the development and manufacturing
of HPAPI.
  Handling these materials, however,
requires sophisticated isolation meth-
ods, which demands an understanding
of the basic concepts of containment
engineering. This understanding assists
in the proper selection of the suitable
isolation method thereby meeting the
operational and financial requirements
of the owner.
The selection of suitable containment equipment
requires a thorough understanding of product and
equipment related exposure limits.
About the author
Vishal Bundele
B.Sc. (Chemical Engineering)
Vishal Bundele works as Execu-
tive Engineer, Process at Elomatic
Pharmalab Consulting & Engineer-
ing Pvt Ltd in Mumbai, India. He has
strong know-how in pharmaceuti-
cal project phases such as installa-
tion, commissioning, qualification
and validation. At Elomatic he has,
among others, been involved in the
re-validation of the oncology prod-
uct manufacturing (small volume
parentals) facility at Mylan Laborato-
ries Ltd. in Vishakhapatnam.
vishal.bundele@elomatic.com
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  32  |  33
The 2004/40/EC European Union
Directive governs the minimum
health and safety requirements
with regards workers’ exposure to
electromagnetic fields. Overexpo-
sure to electromagnetic fields can
have detrimental health effects and
employers, as such, are responsible
for taking preventative measures to
protect workers in this regard. With
the help of computational electro-
magnetics the exact interaction be-
tween electromagnetic fields and
physical objects and the environ-
ment can be established. Making
use of this technology not only en-
sures the health of workers, but can
also reduce costs in the process.
Electric fields are caused by voltage
differences and therefore powerful
electric fields are often found in close
proximity to high current power lines.
Powerful magnetic fields, on the other
hand, commonly occur near industrial
transformers, welding devices or induc-
tion heaters.
  According to the directive any elec-
tromagnetic field in excess of 500
micro Teslas (at 50Hz frequency) is a
health risk. This is due to the fact that
high voltage lines induce an electrical
charge inside the human body while
low frequency (below 50Hz) time-var-
ying magnetic fields induce internal
electromagnetic fields and circular cur-
rents. This can lead to internal warming
of the body and result in several de-
bilitating symptoms. High frequency
dryers that use microwaves can cause
warming on the body surface. Lower
frequency waves penetrate deeper into
the skin and cause more damage than
higher frequency waves.
  Employees with pacemakers are par-
ticularly vulnerable to electromagnetic
radiation and should not be exposed to
electromagnetic fields in excess of 100
micro Teslas. Low frequency magnetic
fields are also known to interfere with
the functioning of pacemakers and my
lead to pacemaker malfunction.
  It is worth noting that many apart-
ment buildings are located near high
power transmission lines, while work-
stations are sometimes also placed in
close proximity to high power trans-
formers. Humans that use those spaces
are potentially placed at risk of overex-
posure to electromagnetic fields.
  Overexposure can cause headaches,
nausea, depression, hyperactivity and
skin redness to name a few of the most
common symptoms.
Computational Electromagnetics
– simulating the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields
Employing shields to reduce
exposure
The magnetic field caused by a trans-
former decreases considerably the fur-
ther away one is from the transformer
in question. When a human is close
enough to the source of the electro-
magnetic radiation shields need to be
employed to reduce the exposure to
acceptable levels.
  A common misconception is that
concrete walls provide sufficient shield-
ing, but this is simply not the case. In
order to effectively reduce exposure
levels, lead plates and grounded steel
nets have to be employed. The dimen-
sioning, positioning and material com-
position of shields have clear cost im-
plications and this is where technical
analysis tools come in handy to find
optimal solutions.
Computational electromagnetics
simulates exposure levels
Computational electromagnetics can
be used to simulate the effects of elec-
tromagnetic fields and the effective-
ness of shielding devices. It allows de-
signers to define the optimal shield
thickness, positioning and materi-
als used by testing, for example, how
transformers in different positions af-
fect the surrounding environment.
  The simulation provides the designer
with a clear view of no-go areas for em-
ployees. This ensures that the shields
employed are optimally proportioned
not to take up unnecessary space, but
sufficient to maintain exposure at safe
levels.
  In order for the simulation to be run
the average power load and technical
data of the transformer is required as
well as the building dimensions and
the materials that the transformer and
building are made of.
Typical simulation
takes a few days
The analysis can be conducted, for ex-
ample, with the ANSYS Maxwell soft-
ware package. The modelling for a
typical site usually takes a few days
depending on the size of the site,
the number of transformers and how
close together or far apart they are. The
scope of the study naturally also af-
fects the time required; are magnetic
fields or electrical fields being studied
or both, and are the shield positions
and dimensions also covered etc?
  The information gathered during
simulation can be used by employers
to remove or reduce health risks effec-
tively and reduce costs by ensuring op-
timized installations.
  A safer working environment and
one that complies with the applicable
EU directive reduces sick leave, work
accidents and other harmful effects.
The result is a win-win situation both
for employer and employee.
Link to EU directive:
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do
?uri=OJ:L:2004:184:0001:0009:EN:PDF
About the author
Kari Haimi
M.Sc. (Electrical Engineering)
Kari Haimi graduated as a gradu-
ate engineer from the Tampere Uni-
versity of Technology in 2013. He
started working at Elomatic in 2012.
His expertise area is technical analy-
sis and he has particular know-how
in the technical analysis of electro-
magnetic fields.
kari.haimi@elomatic.com
Photo©2014DmitryKalinovsky
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  34  |  35
When offering product and service
solutions, many details need to be
taken into consideration from cus-
tomer needs and ideas to produc-
tion and launch on the market. The
core competence of product design
and development needs to be sup-
plemented by expertise in the stra-
tegic development of services and
business operations. Motivated mul-
ti-industrial professional teams pro-
duce the best results. The will to cre-
ate solutions that are sustainable
and purposeful is of particular im-
portance, while the time spent on
and the risks associated with de-
velopment must be minimised to
create new space for new innova-
tion. The innovative capacity of new
products is what puts you ahead of
your competitors.
Management and leadership of
creativity and innovative capaci-
ty is the responsibility of business man-
agement, but every employee can play
a part. Innovation can be defined as
the organisation’s ability to build new
features that improve competitiveness
(products, production processes, busi-
ness ideas, services, etc.). This requires
specific working methods.
  The innovative capacity of an or-
ganisation is built on three founda-
tions: atmosphere (a working culture
that encourages innovation), chan-
nels (innovation process, team, etc.)
and guidance (innovation direction).
Real innovation refers to a new prod-
uct or service that revolutionises the
market.
Creativity and Method
– the cornerstones of success
  Creativity is a key factor in innova-
tion and often the most crucial one.
The core of innovation lies at the very
beginning of the innovation process
where numerous ideas must be gen-
erated. Selected ideas are turned into
product development, strategies, new
markets, production development and
personal development.
  Product features and usability are
not created by themselves, but they
need systematic action at the very first
stages of product development. User-
centred design provides product de-
velopment with the means to build
good product usability. As a result of
good user-centred design, product de-
velopment is more controlled. It results
in end products that are more effective,
pleasant and safer to use. At the same
time, costs related to product launch
and use are lowered. The further the
product development progresses, the
more expensive any product chang-
es are as capital is tied to the product
throughout the process. Usability is not
just a topping that can be added to a
finished product.
  Product and user segmentation
ensures that the visual appearance
of the product is purposeful and well
planned.The product appearance must
communicate its purpose, method, en-
vironment and users in as much de-
tail as possible. During a brainstorming
session the idea is to come up with var-
ious design ideas and different techni-
cal solutions. As the process progresses,
the most feasible ideas will be selected
for further development.
  The product concept or prototype
already includes the new product’s
technical features and dimensions in
relation to the product’s appearance
and usability. A well-designed product
Res
earch
Inno
vation
Strategic
Planning
Produc
tisation
Product
and Service
Development Achieve the true value of
innovative capacity
■■ By rewarding people or
teams that have made im-
provements or produced
something significant.
■■ By performing regular mea-
surements. Measurement
and analysis of results focus
on a single point.
■■ By making the best represent-
atives into everyday he-
roes. Creating hero tales and
spreading them through inter-
nal communications channels
is effective, but it is important
to direct them correctly and
equally. The management can
also create value by keeping a
topic continuously visible.
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  36  |  37
is more attractive, desirable and more
functional in terms of technology and
ergonomics. Product graphics com-
prise a significant part of the finished
appearance. They strengthen the prod-
uct image by furnishing the designed
product with the company’s visual el-
ements and brand. What is more, the
purpose of product graphics is always
to support and improve product us-
ability.
Required: vision, strategy
and diverse competence
A creative base can be expanded by a
large group of experts. Experts in me-
chanics, production, innovation, usa-
bility and strategy, industrial design,
graphic design, programming, ani-
mation and application development
form a productive group. By setting up
innovation teams and committing ex-
perts to solving various customer prob-
lems and meeting expectations, true
innovation can be created. This com-
petence serves to produce results that
secure the success and competitive-
ness of industrial plants, products and
services. The ultimate goal is to provide
people with solutions that are sustain-
able and practical.
  Strategic planning usually focus-
es on offering solutions for critical op-
erational success factors so that they
can be implemented using controlled
long-term and efficient means. Strate-
gic work is often allocated to products,
technologies, innovation and design. It
is necessary and important to respond
to strategic questions when looking for
the correct path towards initial devel-
opment and innovation processes. The
objective is to recognise opportunities
for innovation or business operations.
The birth of innovation
and working based
on systems and solutions
Innovation can be, or should be, car-
ried out systematically in companies.
The phase preceding product develop-
ment, i.e. FEI (Front End of Innovation),
can be modelled and systemized to
form an excellent basis for a successful
product development project. Innova-
tion starts from a problem, and above
all, the recognition of customer needs,
which together form the true starting
point for innovation.
Marketing
Industrial Design
Usability
Ergonomics
Simulation
Technical Production
Development
Production
Project Management
M
P
TPD
ID
ID
FEICustomer and
environment
needs
  We can successfully approach a de-
velopment challenge through system-
atic thinking. We should seek answers
to the following questions. What are
we dealing with? What is the correct
question to ask? What do we need to
develop? We try to understand the cus-
tomer, the user and the problem. We
should perform functional analyses
and product specifications.
  When analysing successful innova-
tion projects, one usually finds an un-
derlying and well-recognised custom-
er need and a well-defined problem,
from which the process was initiated.
Once the problem has been identi-
fied, it should first be investigated, an-
alysed and reshaped – in more ways
than one.
  There are many ways to reshape the
problem. When developing a new ver-
sion of an existing product, it is im-
portant to analyse the good features
of the product, looking at what works
and what should be retained in the
new version. Often, product problems
are well-known, but good features may
be forgotten and hidden under the sur-
face.
  A few leading guidelines related to
the product development project offer
responses to the previous questions.
These may include user-centred sur-
veys and technological research.
  User-centred research provides un-
derstanding of the product or service
users’world and any of their conscious
and unconscious needs. Research
methods offer a means to transfer an
understanding of user needs, usability,
ergonomics and design to the product
or service.
 Through technological research
we can strengthen our understand-
ing and increase know-how in order
to analyse the functionality and per-
formance of current products and pro-
duction processes. Research serves to
develop existing products and process-
es from a technological point of view,
and to ensure that the objectives of on-
going development projects are met or
even exceeded.
  When developing a new product, it
is useful to become familiar with simi-
lar products on the market and analyse
their features as accurately as possi-
ble. Databases also offer many solution
proposals and ideas that have never
been put into practice. They may con-
tain feasible ideas that should be an-
alysed alongside our own ideas. This
saves time and money compared to a
M
M
MP
P
P
ID
ID
ID
Innovation /
Successful product
TPD
TPD
TPD
ProcessdiagramdesignNikoIhalainen/Elomatic
“Innovation starts from a problem, and above
all, the recognition of customer needs.”
▲▲ With the aid of diverse know-how the
customer and the environment needs
are processed into innovations and
business growth
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  38  |  39
situation where all problems are veri-
fied in connection with the develop-
ment project.
  The starting point for all product
and service development solutions
is a deep understanding of custom-
er needs, demands and their related
functionalities. In addition, we need to
understand how we can produce add-
ed value for end customers through
customer products and services. This
means considering how we can allo-
cate our resources to offer solutions
that maximise this added value in the
entire product and service network. By
following these main principles, we can
deliver various solutions for different
business challenges.
Introducing a refined idea
to the rest of the world
A refined idea must be systematically
polished into a concrete product or
service. The process starts from initial
questions that define objectives and
the operating environment and mirror
our ideas and goals with respect to the
target group. It requires a large group
of experts to solve and plan a success-
ful outcome.
  By asking and answering the right
questions one can achieve much. Who
is the customer? What are the cus-
tomer’s needs? What problem or need
are we solving? How much is the cus-
tomer ready to pay for the product or
service? Where is the product or ser-
vice available? Who are our competi-
tors? What are the superior competi-
tive factors of our product or service?
Does our idea need protection? What
kind of image should the product or
service reflect?
  If our resources run out, we should
look for a reliable partner that can
help us with the questions above. The
partner may offer help in the produc-
tisation of ideas, products and ser-
vices.
  There are partners that are involved
in product and service development
from the very first ideas to the launch
to the market. The advantage of such
an arrangement is that the partners are
able to react thoroughly to various de-
velopment needs with the help of their
numerous experts.
  Everything is based on product
planning competence. Technical and
engineering challenges are no stran-
gers when it comes to product devel-
opment.
  By investing in integrated prod-
uct development, results can be
achieved through the simultaneous
performance of different competence
areas and project stages. The integrat-
ed development model often plays a
key role when refining an idea into a
market product or service, while keep-
ing risks and costs effectively under
control.
  The design of concrete products
and services is supplemented by fo-
cussing on the first phases in the de-
velopment process. And that is where
we play our role investigating, inno-
vating and conceptualising the most
important content solutions in order
to achieve successful products and
services. We refine products into ser-
vices when they require control, guid-
ance, maintenance or marketing. Our
expertise produces the most benefits
when we can solve challenges relat-
ed to products and their surrounding
services.
About the authors
Timo Piirainen
B.Sc. (Production Technology)
Timo Piirainen holds a Mechanical
Engineering degree from the Wärt-
silä Technical Acadamy from where
he entered working life after gradu-
ation in 1985. He has gained diverse
work experience in different posi-
tions in numerous product devel-
opment projects over the years. His
know-how also covers engineering
method development, and current
areas of involvement include a dig-
itisation and future product devel-
opment projects. Mr Piirainen joined
Elomatic in 1995 and currently holds
the position of Vice President, R&D
Projects.
timo.piirainen@elomatic.com
Jukka Mikkonen
B.I.D. (Industrial Design)
Jukka Mikkonen has worked as an
industrial designer and industrial
design manager for 20 years. Dur-
ing his career he has participated in
over one hundred industrial design
and product development projects
in design and management roles.
Mikkonen joined Elomatic in 2011 at
works at the Elomatic Helsinki office
where he is the Industrial Design
Manager of the product develop-
ment department.
jukka.mikkonen@elomatic.com
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  40  |  41
The barren desert environment is
as far removed from Finland as it
could possibly be. One should nev-
ertheless not be surprised if the jet
pump technology and equipment
used there to pump oil to the surface
is provided by a company based in
Pori on the west coast of Finland.
Wellquip Ltd (WQ) has quietly made
a name for itself in developing state-
of-the-art oil and gas production
equipment packages and software
(FloWQ systems) and in supplying
turnkey deliveries worldwide. De-
velopment of its own oil and gas
surface and downhole equipment
and technology began in 2004. In
this article we highlight some of the
development phases and techno-
logical advances of this remarkable
journey into the unknown.
What makes WQ’s specialisation
in oil and gas technology even
more surprising is that Finland does
not have its own oil and gas reserves
and consequently the culture in this
area is very thin or non-existent. There
are also no faculties at Finnish universi-
ties that offer studies in the field.
  In 2004 WQ nevertheless took up the
challenge and began studying feasible
areas in oil and gas field development
technology. Their efforts were focused
on identifying future trends and related
requirements. At the time the devel-
opment team identified the need to
produce wells with high paraffin, sand
and gas content and the production
of heavy oil as growing future needs in
the FSU market.
  According to Wellquip Managing Di-
rector, Sakari Oja, the surface equip-
ment package has been under contin-
uous development since they decided
to enter the field in 2004.
  “In the beginning the equipment
package was based mainly on foreign
technology and both the analysis work
to define the equipment configuration
best suited for each well and the actu-
al equipment was mainly contracted
from the USA. We realised very soon
that we needed to develop our own
technology in order to gain a better
understanding of related phenomena
and to reduce the risks associated with
dependence on external suppliers”, ex-
plains Oja.
  “We also needed to develop soft-
ware to determine the optimal equip-
ment configuration for each separate
oil well. We cooperated with the Tam-
pere Technical University to create our
own software for this purpose.”
Jet pump technology
for artificial lift in oil and gas production
Elomatic acquires
share of Wellquip
In May 2014 Elomatic acquired a
share of Wellquip Ltd after which
Elomatic and Wellquip’s Offshore
operations were integrated. The
company continues to operate un-
der the Wellquip name. Wellquip
provides offshore technology,
oilfield solutions and services
with a focus on major hydrocar-
bon production regions. It has
strong experience oil and gas re-
lated activities in arctic offshore
and demanding onshore climates.
According to the agreement Elo-
matic has an option to acquire a
majority share in the company
during 2014.
What is artificial lift and when
is it required?
In oil production artificial lift is re-
quired when the natural pressure
in the underground oil reservoir
is not sufficient to push oil to the
surface in a self-flowing system.
Most oil wells require artificial
lift, which is generally provided
by a pumping mechanism. Beam
pumps are the most common and
constitute about 80% of all pumps
used in artificial lift production.
Jet pumps are worth noting as
they have no moving parts, which
again means an advantage con-
cerning down-time in production.
How does a jet pump
function?
In essence a jet pump is an ejec-
tor, located at the bottom of an
oil well, modified for oil and gas
production in order to ensure
easy operation. It mainly consists
of a nozzle, throat and diffusor.
The working fluid from the sur-
face is pumped through the noz-
zle, which creates suction for pro-
duced fluids. The working fluid
and produced fluids are mixed in
the throat after which the mixture
continues through the diffusor
to the surface. The nozzle/throat
combination is crucial in deter-
mining jet pump performance.
Each oil well needs to be analysed
separately and finding the opti-
mum nozzle/throat combination
from the 150–200 possible stand-
ard and tailor-designed combina-
tions with optimum equipment on
the surface is a complex task. An
extensive software package is re-
quired to make the necessary cal-
culations.
▼▼ Diagram 1. A schematic presentation of the test-
ing package. Pump 1 (180 l/min 130 bar) pro-
duces the working fluid flow and pressure and
Pump 2 (140 l/min 80 bar) the flow and reservoir
pressure of the produced fluid. Both have suction
from the water tank. Gas can be added to the
produced fluid from the nitrogen bottle battery
before reaching the jet pump.
▲▲ The WQ laboratory testing device used to simu-
late oil well features
The Elomatic Magazine  ·  42  |  43
Testing equipment to analyse
hydrodynamic flow
inside jet pump
In order to analyse the hydrodynam-
ic flow inside a jet pump the pressure
reduction factors at the nozzle, throat
and diffusor for each nozzle/throat
combination have to be determined.
There are, however, a vast number of
possible combinations and taking the
required measurements is extremely
time-consuming.
  “For this reason we tried to identify
dependencies between pump pres-
sure reduction factors and other factors
such as the nozzle/throat diameter ratio,
spacing between the nozzle and throat,
gas presence and Reynolds number etc.
With the help of this information the
software could automatically use the
correct pressure reduction factors once
the pump geometry and liquid proper-
ties were defined”, Oja explains.
  See diagram 1 for a detailed over-
view of the test equipment setup.
▲▲ Diagram 2. The operator’s process
view
▼▼ Diagram 3. The practical efficiency of
the nozzle/throat combination as a
function of M
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
N(M)
η(M)
M	=	
produced fluid
working fluid
η	 =	 Jet Pump’s coefficient
		of efficiency
N	 =	 Pressure Ratio
pd – ps
pi – pd
, where
		pd = pressure after the pump,
		pi = pressure of liquid fed into pump
		ps = the pump’s suction pressure
M
N η
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
  All the testing procedures were
controlled with the operator’s PC. The
measurements taken from 18 measur-
ing points every second were saved in
the PC memory. See diagram 2 for the
operators process view.
Overcoming challenges
Initially testing produced unexpect-
ed results while the automation sys-
tem proved to be unstable. The cavita-
tion plane had a few surprises in store
for the testing team too. The work flu-
id discharge pressure showed varia-
tions despite the installation of pres-
sure dampers. Over time the testing
team’s know-how and accuracy, how-
ever, increased until proper results
were achieved.
  “This is what engineering and re-
search is all about. We had to figure
out what to do and how to do it. We
found solutions to all these challenges”,
Oja says proudly.
  The immediate test result allowed a
performance curve to be drawn for the
nozzle/throat combination in question.
The curve showed the practical effi-
ciency of the nozzle/throat combina-
tion as a function of M. See diagram 3.
  The next step included saving the
measurements on the computer and
manipulating them with a custom-
made software program, which calcu-
lated all the necessary pressure reduc-
tion coefficients in the jet pump. An
example of the measurements taken
is displayed in Table 1.
Software developed to select
optimal equipment configuration
While the measurements were being
taken and results analysed the soft-
ware to select the optimal subsurface
and surface equipment was also de-
veloped.
  “The program is ready now to be
used as a practical tool and it has been
tested in real conditions and the re-
sults are very encouraging. It contains
many quality features such as vertical
two-phase flow with gas compressi-
bility and analyses of extreme condi-
tions”, says Oja.
  “Actually of most value to us now is
that we know exactly how the system
works. The entire development process
has provided us with a deeper overall
understanding of oil production. Origi-
nally we thought that we would con-
centrate purely on pumping the fluids
from the reservoir to the surface, but
we noticed very quickly that the char-
acteristics of the reservoir could not
be ignored. Our clients are often inter-
ested in the special features of the res-
ervoir, which now can be addressed
and presented. We now have a better
understanding of parameter influence
on the system efficiency and economy.
The program has been loaded onto our
server and is ready for use by our cli-
ents”, Oja concludes.
Text: Martin Brink
Sensor
Time
Fl 25,1 Fl 25,2 Fl 25,3 Fl 26,1 Fl 26,2 Pt 28 Pt 29 Po 30 Ps 31 Pi 33 Td 34 Ti 37
15:13:28 0 0 11,270 0 44,423 5,863 11,874 5,791 5,783 28,443 17,925 17,882
15:13:29 0 0 11,579 0 44,809 5,921 12,019 5,588 5,982 28,258 17,925 17,911
15:13:30 0 0 11,656 0 45,195 5,921 12,106 5,762 5,841 28,536 17,925 17,882
15:13:31 0 0 11,656 0 45,195 5,863 12,164 5,762 5,841 28,304 17,925 17,911
15:13:32 0 0 11,502 0 45,427 5,921 12,135 5,704 5,899 28,073 17,925 17,882
15:13:33 0 0 11,038 0 45,195 5,863 12,019 5,762 5,841 28,351 17,925 17,882
15:13:34 0 0 11,038 0 45,891 5,892 12,164 5,704 5,841 27,61 17,925 17,882
15:13:35 0 0 11,038 0 44,886 5,892 12,019 5,588 5,899 28,073 17,925 17,882
15:13:36 0 0 11,038 0 43,882 5,805 12,048 5,762 5,697 28,258 17,925 17,882
15:13:37 0 0 11,270 0 44,732 6,008 12,164 5,559 5,899 28,258 17,925 17,882
15:13:38 0 0 11,193 0 44,655 5,805 11,816 5,791 5,783 28,304 17,925 17,882
▲▲ Table 1. An example of measurements
taken (20.3.2012) from 12 sensors
once a second. The location of sen-
sors shown in Diagram 2.
Scientia vires est
At Elomatic we believe that our human capital is our most precious asset.
With knowledge comes the power to shape the future.
We continuously develop our employees’ know-how and strive to be leaders in
our respective technical fields. We focus on packaging and delivering this know-
how to ensure that our customers stay ahead of their competition.
The Top Engineer magazine offers our experts the opportunity to share their ex-
pertise and knowledge and to engage other technical experts with their writing.
It is a publication by engineers, for engineers, and other technically-minded readers.
www.elomatic.com
In May 2014 Elomatic acquired a share
of technology firm Wellquip Ltd. As
a result of combining their business
operations an internationally signif-
icant player in the offshore business
has been formed in Finland. The com-
pany’s core knowhow is offshore and
oil and gas production solutions and it
aims in particular to achieve growth in
the arctic marine business in the Rus-
sian and Caspian Sea markets.
Wellquip provides offshore technology
and oilfield solutions and services. The
company has extensive experience of
the Russian and Central Asian markets.
  Elomatic and Wellquip have in re-
cent years cooperated actively in differ-
ent business areas. They have, among
others, founded a joint venture compa-
ny, Caspian Offshore Solutions, in Astra-
khan Russia with a Russian partner. Elo-
matic and Wellquip are also currently
undertaking a joint engineering project
for a Caspian Sea jackup vessel.
  According to the agreement Elomat-
ic will initially acquire a significant mi-
nority share. Elomatic has the option
to acquire a majority share in Wellquip
during 2014.
Elomatic and Wellquip merge
offshore business operations
– Joint venture company aims for growth in Arctic market

More Related Content

What's hot (6)

Test
TestTest
Test
 
testingexperience19_09_12
testingexperience19_09_12testingexperience19_09_12
testingexperience19_09_12
 
Project Management in the Fuzzy Front-End
Project Management in the Fuzzy Front-EndProject Management in the Fuzzy Front-End
Project Management in the Fuzzy Front-End
 
Envisioning Labs Executive Summary 2020
Envisioning Labs Executive Summary 2020Envisioning Labs Executive Summary 2020
Envisioning Labs Executive Summary 2020
 
Chemelot Ventures Master Thesis
Chemelot Ventures Master ThesisChemelot Ventures Master Thesis
Chemelot Ventures Master Thesis
 
Introduction to Technology Transfer
Introduction to Technology TransferIntroduction to Technology Transfer
Introduction to Technology Transfer
 

Similar to Elomatic_Top_Engineer_2014-1

202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
maheshshinde762539
 
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-EdisiProduct-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
Sreesh P Somarajan
 
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organizationexpernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
Adam Radziszewski
 
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle InnovationIn Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
NTT Innovation Institute Inc.
 
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value  Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
imec.archive
 
Materials Research Institute
Materials Research InstituteMaterials Research Institute
Materials Research Institute
Dean Hurley
 
Ilmars Viksne: Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
Ilmars Viksne:  Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...Ilmars Viksne:  Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
Ilmars Viksne: Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
CUBCCE Conference
 
Actiflow Brochure En 2011
Actiflow Brochure En 2011Actiflow Brochure En 2011
Actiflow Brochure En 2011
Roy Campe
 

Similar to Elomatic_Top_Engineer_2014-1 (20)

Working at Yokogawa
Working at YokogawaWorking at Yokogawa
Working at Yokogawa
 
Working at Yokogawa
Working at YokogawaWorking at Yokogawa
Working at Yokogawa
 
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
 
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-EdisiProduct-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi
 
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
202-Product-Design-and-Development-Karl-T.-Ulrich-Steven-D.-Eppinger-Edisi-6-...
 
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organizationexpernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
expernova-white-paper-the-best-practices-for-leading-an-open-organization
 
Ndl bio 2014
Ndl bio 2014Ndl bio 2014
Ndl bio 2014
 
Layer by layer to success
Layer by layer to successLayer by layer to success
Layer by layer to success
 
Opportunity definition 2011
Opportunity definition 2011Opportunity definition 2011
Opportunity definition 2011
 
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle InnovationIn Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
In Pursuit of Innovation: Full Lifecycle Innovation
 
ENIT introduction
ENIT introductionENIT introduction
ENIT introduction
 
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value  Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
Apollon-23/05/2012-9u30- Parallell session: Living Labs added value
 
Esa Ala-Uotila Suuntaamo Living Labs added Value
Esa Ala-Uotila Suuntaamo Living Labs added ValueEsa Ala-Uotila Suuntaamo Living Labs added Value
Esa Ala-Uotila Suuntaamo Living Labs added Value
 
Innovation management
Innovation managementInnovation management
Innovation management
 
Research collaboration fostering mutual value of universities and sm es 2016 ...
Research collaboration fostering mutual value of universities and sm es 2016 ...Research collaboration fostering mutual value of universities and sm es 2016 ...
Research collaboration fostering mutual value of universities and sm es 2016 ...
 
Materials Research Institute
Materials Research InstituteMaterials Research Institute
Materials Research Institute
 
Ilmars Viksne: Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
Ilmars Viksne:  Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...Ilmars Viksne:  Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
Ilmars Viksne: Innovation and Technology Transfer as the Third Pillar of Mod...
 
Actiflow Brochure En 2011
Actiflow Brochure En 2011Actiflow Brochure En 2011
Actiflow Brochure En 2011
 
170309 press-release-world-record-r2 r-peroskite-solar-cells-en
170309 press-release-world-record-r2 r-peroskite-solar-cells-en170309 press-release-world-record-r2 r-peroskite-solar-cells-en
170309 press-release-world-record-r2 r-peroskite-solar-cells-en
 
Innovation journey study final report - october 2013 - summary
Innovation journey study   final report - october 2013 - summaryInnovation journey study   final report - october 2013 - summary
Innovation journey study final report - october 2013 - summary
 

Elomatic_Top_Engineer_2014-1

  • 1. The Elomatic Magazine 1·2014 Product testing Gaining a competitive advantage page 4 Biohazards Air tightness testing for biosafety level 3 page 22 Oil & gas Jet pump technology page 40 “We need a rational and defendable standard that satisfies industrial, regulatory and public interests.” –Milind Shinde
  • 2. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  2  |  3 The mystery of the human mind has fascinated man- kind over the centuries. Ancient philosophers and cur- rent day cognitive scientists have tried to understand what makes the human brain the ultimate tool and such a unique instrument.   The ability to learn new things is a lifelong process and different individuals absorb knowledge differently depend- ing on their specific backgrounds. Experience and age are commonly perceived to be the main determinants when analysing the development of a person’s cognitive ability. One should not, however, underestimate the importance of motivation, emotion and a healthy life style in successful learning processes.   According to cognitive scientists intelligence and learn- ing ability take various forms. Components such as percep- tion, memory, association, concept formation, problem solv- ing and mental imagery play an important role when trying to figure out the holistic outcome of the learning process. Some educational institutes offer scholars courses such as “Theory of Knowledge”in their curriculums. Students are en- couraged to discover the views of and justifications for dif- ferent issues, rather than debating the rights or wrongs of those phenomena.   The strength of mankind lies also in our ability to work together and produce something called “group cognition”. In addition to traditional physical group work, collaborative learning can benefit from different networks that can easily be accessed across digital media applications.   It is not farfetched to claim that nations without vast amounts on natural resources are particularly dependent on their ability to innovate and create opportunities to remain competitive. In addition to various academic institutions and research centres, engineering companies play an important role in creating wealth through innovation and research. This technical journal is an example of the intellectual capacity that a modern engineering company must possess and de- liver for the benefit of its customers. Hopefully reading the articles will provide you with a positive learning experience and a healthy challenge to your cognitive learning abilities. Heikki Pöntynen Editor-in-Chief Photo©2014Elomatic/OlliTuomola Thinking and awareness The Elomatic Magazine renews its face The Elomatic Newsletter has received a new face and will from now on be published under the “Top Engi- neer” banner to better reflect the content and target audience of our magazine. The name has changed, but our goal of providing our readers with informative and cutting edge technical articles remains the same. We look forward to hearing your feedback about your reading experience. Heikki
  • 3. Contents 1/2014 Publisher Elomatic Itäinen Rantakatu 72 20810 Turku, Finland Tel. +358 2 412 411 info@elomatic.com www.elomatic.com Editor-in-Chief Heikki Pöntynen heikki.pontynen@elomatic.com Editor Martin Brink martin.brink@elomatic.com Art Director Olli Tuomola olli.tuomola@elomatic.com Milind Shinde Air tightness testing for biosafety level 3 22 Mika Kuhmonen & Arto Sampo Gaining a competitive advantage – Testing products in simulated environments 4 Martin Brink Still Going Strong: Heikki Pirilä – 30 years in starch processing 8 Juha Järvenreuna & Mika Nummila Modern flue gas scrubber – significant improvements in the profitability of bioenergy heating plants 12 Vladimir Pöyhönen Virtualisation of automation systems – a brave new world 16 Harri Hytönen Human errors – usability as a safety factor in working environments 20 Vishal Bundele Containment Engineering – A systematic approach to handle highly potent active ingredients and pathogens 28 Kari Haimi Computational Electromagnetics – simulating the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields 32 Timo Piirainen & Jukka Mikkonen Creativity and Method – the cornerstones of success 34 Martin Brink Jet pump technology for artificial lift in oil and gas production 40 If you would like to receive a copy of the Top Engineer, or would like to be added to our Top Engineer mailing list please send your request to info@elomatic.com. Elomatic believes that all information provided in this publication is correct at the time of printing. Elomatic is not responsible for any inadvertent errors. Elomatic holds the copyright to all materials contained in this publication, unless specified otherwise. Written permission from Elomatic is required for the reproduc- tion of articles in whole or in part. Cover: Milind Shinde works at the Elomatic Mum- bai office. Background photo © 2013 Wavebreak Me- dia Ltd.
  • 4. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  4  |  5 Gaining a competitive advantage   – Testing products in simulated environments : case Wärtsilä The Elomatic Magazine  ·  4  |  5
  • 5. Taking good products and turn- ing them into world beaters is becoming increasingly demand- ing as customers’ expectations with regards quality, dependa- bility, economical performance and costs show no bounds. User experiences, modern computer simulations and other analysis tools are integral parts of efficient product design, but in some cas- es they do not suffice to take the product to the next level. In such cases testing real products in vir- tually real conditions has become a key resource in gaining the ex- tra competitive edge required. ◄◄ A test bench used to test propulsion devices in real seagoing conditions.
  • 6. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  6  |  7 Implementing testing of real prod- ucts is fairly straightforward when the product is relatively small and its oper- ational conditions close to the norm. Once the product size increases and the operational conditions are more challenging, the situation quickly be- comes quite the opposite.   One only has to imagine the diffi- culties associated with the testing of satellites, space ships or submarines in real-life conditions to understand that in those cases it is almost impossible, or at least extremely costly to conduct the necessary testing in real-life con- ditions.   The testing of new technologies is often left for maiden voyages and cus- tomer projects, which comes with un- wanted added commercial risks. Lab- oratories that can test real products under realistic conditions have, there- fore, become a key tool in expediting product or technology development. Such laboratories facilitate learning about the product and its behaviour and speed up the product technology development cycle. Propulsion device test centre simulates real seagoing loads Wärsilä Ltd’s recently implemented propulsion device test centre in Tuu- sula, southern Finland is a good exam- ple of a product testing facility that fa- cilitates significant technology leaps in product development. See picture on previous spread. The centre allows real propulsion devices to be tested in vir- tually real seagoing and harbour con- ditions, while also allowing for the ef- fects of icy conditions to be taken into consideration. The project was imple- mented by Wärsilä in cooperation with the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland and Elomatic Ltd, which deliv- ered the test bench of the centre on an EPCM basis.   The effectiveness of new technologi- cal solutions can be tested at the cen- tre, after which they can be transferred directly to end products. This signifi- cantly speeds up the development of product performance and the identi- fication of new possibilities. The test centre is a world first and allows the development of more effective and ef- ficient propulsion devices for the glob- al Marine industry.   The testing laboratory is a rather im- pressive sight. It has to accommodate products for testing that weigh up to 20 tonnes, are 4 metres high and pro- duce almost 3 MW power output. Add to that the creation of seagoing and icy conditions and the extent of the centre becomes clear. Relatively long testing times While on the test bench the product can be exposed to the exact fluctuat-
  • 7. ing loads it will experience at sea. Even the cooling effects of ocean currents has been accounted for. The testing times are relatively long and can last for several weeks. The testing system is very flexible with regards how loads are placed on the tested product, at what frequency and cycle and for how long tests are conducted.   During a typical test the device col- lects measurement data from over a hundred different measurement points. The measurement points and measurement scales can be altered from one test to the next.   The test centre allows different par- ties to work together in the develop- ment and testing of new technologies. This cooperation includes customers, research centres, universities and sup- pliers.   The implementation of the propul- sion device test centre at Wärsilä is a shining example of how advanced test- ing technologies can be used to opti- mize product development and the implementation of new technologies. All eyes are on them now to see what new and ground-breaking features they will develop with the aid of this technology. The sky is the limit. When should analysis and user experience make way for laboratory testing? ■■ Product operates in condi- tions that renders measuring and testing too difficult or ex- pensive ■■ Product is affected by com- plex dynamics ■■ Generating results is extremely time consuming ■■ User tests are expensive and require lengthy implementa- tion times ■■ The customer aims for a large technological leap in a short timeframe Advanced testing technologies are ideal tools in optimizing product development. Arto Sampo B.Sc. (Machine Design), M.Sc. (Automation) Arto Sampo has extensive experi- ence in production lines and the design of special devices used in production in a wide range of indus- tries. His experience covers design projects and implementation pro- jects as well as different product de- velopment projects since 1981. He has also taught special courses re- lated to his fields of expertise at the Jyväskylä University of Applied Sci- ences for more than 10 years. Arto has worked at Elomatic in different positions since 1990 and his current position is Business Area Manager, Production Development Projects. arto.sampo@elomatic.com Mika Kuhmonen Ph.D. (Production Engineering) Mr Kuhmonen has gained exten- sive experience of discrete manu- facturing development internation- ally and domestically since his M.Sc. graduation in 1993. He has partici- pated in numerous factory develop- ment projects in Europe, USA and Asia implementing e.g. Lean manu- facturing, Theory of Constraints on shop floors and order-delivery pro- cesses. Mr Kuhmonen has held po- sitions from production expert to global development executive and joined Elomatic in 2010. mika.kuhmonen@elomatic.com About the authors
  • 8. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  8  |  9 Still Going Strong Heikki Pirilä – 30 years in starch processing
  • 9. Making it in the starch process- ing business requires a keen eye for raw material quality and the ability to get the most out of your raw materials. A general rule of thumb is: the more refined the product, the more valuable it be- comes. The investment payback time on a starch processing plant investment is rather long, so pa- tience and a big wallet come in handy. The strong and growing demand for especially modified starches and valuable by-prod- ucts is nevertheless enough to keep long-term investors keen. The reason is that starch and starch by-products are omni- present; they are everywhere you look, that is as long as you know what you are looking at. “One of my clients once said that starch processing is second in complexity only to nuclear power generation.” Text: Martin Brink
  • 10. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  10  |  11 Heikki Pirilä has an eye for starch and starch by-products. He has been in the starch processing business for the better part of three decades, so there is not much that surprises him anymore. He started in the business as a design engineer back in 1984 and has been involved in all project phases of starch processing from design, pro- ject management, supervision and pro- curement to maintenance.   His work has seen him travel widely especially in Eastern Europe and Asia. His expertise is not limited to success- fully setting up wheat starch process- ing plants; throughout the years he has gained valuable knowledge of raw ma- terials sourcing regions, cultures and lo- cal energy sources, particularly in Rus- sia and China where he has worked extensively. Developments and future trends Surprisingly little has changed over the years with regards to how wheat starch is processed. Development ef- forts have rather been focused on im- proving devices and the efficiency of the process as well as the further pro- cessing of starch.   “We have, for example, invented in- line flour/water mixing, which means that there is no dough preparation and no delay before three-phase fraction- ing. We have also come up with our own maturing drum and agglomera- tor to ensure holding times that are op- timal and even. The system is nearly fully closed, which means that we use less fresh water and therefore also pro- duce less waste water. Due the relative- ly long payback period it is important to find ways to reduce the investment and production costs and make the whole process more efficient”, explains Heikki.   Native starch production is in itself not that attractive and the goal of most producers is in fact to enhance the pro- duction of highly valued products such as gluten and other products made of starch as well as by-products.   “I don’t really see native starch pro- duction as holding much promise, but there is a definite trend in further pro- cessing of starch into modified starches, syrups and sweeteners, organic acids, bi- oplastics, and biofuels and so on. When you look at the revenue structure the reason is very clear. Starch fetches about €400–450 per tonne and gluten up to €2,000 per tonne. It’s not rocket science to figure out where the real money can be made”, Heikki continues.   “Another noticeable trend is that we are not seeing much in the line of greenfield investments in Western Eu- rope and for existing plants there is usually resistance to make significant process changes. Most investments are related to the renewal of machines and reducing the environmental impacts of production. Eastern Europe, Russia and Asia are definitely where it is happen- ing with regards new investments in wheat starch processing”. Starch processing is a challenging business Wheat starch processing is known as being rather complex in itself and the investments required can hinder mar- ket entrants. Greenfield plants typically require a 5–7 year payback period.   “One of my clients once said that starch processing is second in com- plexity only to nuclear power genera- tion”, says Heikki with a smile.   Investors commonly have to con- sider the energy dependence of their processes and energy prices. It can, however, be difficult to predict the availability and pricing of energy, es- pecially in the long-term. A process that uses vast amounts of energy is sustainable as long as energy prices remain fairly low. There is a case to be made for investing in reducing energy dependence.   “Look for example what is happening in the Ukraine right now. Their energy prices have doubled in the space of a few days and it seems more pain is on the way. Imagine what that increase does to your bottom line.”   Raw material quality commonly changes from year to year and region- ally. Early germination can, for example have a profound impact on the Falling Number, an indicator of the degree of germination and starch breakdown.   A further difficulty faced by produc- ers is choosing their equipment and devices. Basic facts about starch and gluten 1. Where does starch come from? Starch is a storable energy source found in all green plants. It is commonly found in potatoes, maize, wheat, rye, sorghum, barely, triticale, peas, rice and tapioca 2. Where and what is it used for? Industries: Food Industry, Paper and Cardboard Industry, Textiles, Chemi- cals, Pharmaceuticals Food Industry: beverages, sweets, chocolates, baking products, biscuits, desserts, canned fruit, food thickeners and stabilizers. 3. What by-products are produced? Biotech products: citric acid, glutamate, lactic acid, syrup, lysine Biofuels: biogas, bioethanol, biobutanol Feed: for cattle, pigs and poultry in dry and/or slurry form 4. What is gluten and where is it used? Gluten is a very valuable product of wheat starch processing. Gluten is a key ingredient in bread products. It makes dough elastic and helps the bread to rise and keep its shape. It also provides the chewy texture as- sociated with doughnuts and bread. Gluten is also used in cosmetics, hair products and dermatological products.
  • 11.   “There is great variance in the price and quality of devices. Due to the long payback period there is an ever pre- sent temptation to expedite the pay- back period by reducing device pro- curement costs. Facilities can run up to 30 years or even more if maintained properly, but inferior quality devices will usually fail no matter how well they are maintained. It is a fine balance that needs to be struck between the short- term financing needs and life-time costs. In most cases it is a good idea to consult with an independent con- sultant to find the optimal solution”, says Heikki. Staying on top So what does it take to be successful in this business area?   “It probably sounds like I am stat- ing the obvious, but a crucial element is the ability to make maximum use of your raw materials and to run the pro- cess as optimally as possible. Producers that can efficiently produce the high- est quality A-starch, gluten and valua- ble by-products and seamlessly deliver them to the market will always have a competitive edge. Efficiency gains can also be achieved by reducing energy and fresh water consumption”, Heikki eludes.   Proximity to the source of raw ma- terials and good knowledge of local and regional conditions, cultures and infrastructure are also very important factors. Keeping a watch on market developments and predicting which products will do well in future are fur- ther key success factors.   “This is not an easy business, but we do know that the demand for starch and starch by-products remains strong and is increasing. The customers are out there and they will be there for the foreseeable future. Is my job to help my customers to be successful and put my 30 years’ experience at their disposal”, Heikki concludes. ▲▲ The maturing drum and agglomera- tor ensures that holding times are op- timal and even.
  • 12. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  12  |  13 There are many reasons why flue gas scrubber technology should be used. One of the most important is the financial benefits it brings. An immeasurable amount of fully uti- lisable thermal energy vanishes into the sky through the chimneys of heating plants every day. A modern flue gas scrubber can recover any lost heat and offers effective parti- cle filtration for heating companies. Changes in the district heating mar- ket in Europe place many heating plant companies in a challenging posi- tion. There are several diverse reasons for these changes. Competition over heating customers has become signifi- cantly fiercer over the past ten years as competing forms of heating have be- come more popular. The fuel strategies for district heating production in dif- ferent countries are tied to changes in energy reserves and production in the EU and to the entire global economy.   District heating networks are usu- ally old and consumers have inade- quate heat exchangers with poor rates of efficiency. In addition, upgrading production plants to meet the cur- rent energy efficiency and emission requirements often depends on mu- nicipal economies, which may delay or even prevent the completion of finan- cially and environmentally productive investments.   In order to modernise district heat- ing production, we must turn our eyes to financially reasonable small-scale investment projects that serve to in- crease the energy efficiency of heat production and limit the emissions of plants to cost-efficiently meet the cur- rent requirements. Fuel oil is a financial burden for heating companies The majority of heating companies still use heavy fuel oil. Fuel oil is con- sumed especially during periods of ex- treme cold, when primary production plants do not have sufficient capacity. In many cases, the additional need for Modern flue gas scrubbers – significant improvements in the profitability of bioenergy heating plants
  • 13. heat leads to significant fuel oil con- sumption, even during shorter spells of cold weather. According to our experi- ence, a typical energy volume of 3,500– 6,000 MWh a year is produced using fuel oil in heating companies with sol- id fuel plants of 5–10 MW. Most fuel oil is consumed in cold weather during the winter.   In addition, heavy fuel oil is used to compensate for the stoppage and main- tenance of solid fuel boilers. In summer, solid fuel plants run at the lower limits of their adjustment range where such plants are difficult to operate. The dis- trict heat required is then produced us- ing oil or natural gas boilers.   Most heating companies are trying to stop the use of heavy fuel oil. Their reasons are financially and socially sen- sible: the use of heavy fuel oil is simply too expensive and has much higher carbon dioxide emissions that local bi- ofuels. Flue gas scrubbing and recovery of lost heat A flue gas scrubber is a wet scrubber which was originally designed to re- duce particle emissions from flue gas- es. Over time, its development has shifted to improving the recovery of lost heat from flue gases. The particle filtration and heat recovery properties of a traditional flue gas scrubber are based on two consecutive and con- nected processing stages. Flue gas- es are led through a scrubbing phase where the majority of small particles are removed. During the same phase, flue gases are cooled down to their wet temperature (60–70 °C).   After the scrubbing stage, flue gas- es are conveyed to a condenser where they release their thermal energy through condensation in water circu- lating against the current. Condensa- tion takes place in filler layers (one or two layers) that act as heat transfer sur- faces in the process. Circulated water (i.e. generated condensate) is led to the heat exchanger where the thermal energy transferred to the condensate is recovered in the district heating water. (See Figure 1.) DH inlet DH outlet Flue gas Flue gas ▲▲ Figure 1. A simplified traditional scrub- ber process diagram The use of flue gas scrubber technology can bring tangible financial benefits.
  • 14. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  14  |  15 It is essential to reach the dew point in the condensation zone The dew point refers to the tempera- ture at which the relative humidity of the vapour contained by the flue gas is 100%. If the temperature falls below the dew point, the vapour contained by the flue gas begins to condensate, i.e. turn into water. When analysing the transfer of thermal energy, we can see that, in connection with different phase transitions of water, enthalpic changes are significantly higher than in temper- ature changes within a single phase. Therefore, there are significant trans- fers of thermal energy through water vaporisation and vapour condensation (2,350 kJ/kg).   However, the most important factor in heat recovery is that the tempera- ture is below the dew point when the flue gas vapour condensates and the released thermal energy can efficient- ly access the circulated water and, ulti- mately, the heat exchanger.   On the other hand, if the tempera- ture is significantly above the conden- sation point in the scrubber, the heat recovery capacity falls and the scrub- ber will, in the worst case scenario, act as an evaporator. To put it simply, the scrubber vaporises additional water into flue gases. (See Figure 2.) Why does a normal flue gas scrubber not work in extreme cold? Reaching the condensation point tem- perature in any situation is essential considering the scrubber’s heat re- covery. Return district heating water is conducted to the secondary side of the scrubber’s heat exchangers. It cools the flue gases below the dew point temperature. Cooling works and the dew point can be achieved if the district heating network’s return wa- ter temperature remains clearly below the condensation point temperature of the flue gas.   During peak power periods, the aim is to use a high-quality (i.e. dry) fuel. The flue gases of a dry fuel are dry, mean- ing that the dew point is low. During peak loads, the return temperatures of district heating networks increase. The primary reason for this is that the heat exchangers used in households have poor efficiency ratios. They simply can- not transfer the heat required to house- holds; instead, extra heat returns back to the heating plant.   When this excess heat is fed back to the flue gas scrubber’s heat exchang- ers, the dew point cannot be reached and heat recovery decreases signifi- cantly. In other words, the scrubber’s heat recovery capacity collapses. Any missing condensation also causes problems with sludge and clogging in the scrubber. Significant improvements in heat recovery through a heat pump connection Heat pumps have been used in indus- trial applications for decades in various recovery processes for waste heat. A heating plant process is a special case where a correct heat pump connection boosts the recovery process four- or eightfold compared with a traditional scrubber. The heat pump regulates the return temperature of district heating ►► Figure 3. The effect of a scrubber solu- tion with a heat pump connector on a selected heating plant’s heat produc- tion duration curve ◄◄ Figure 2. Wet scrubber thermal energy transfer per fuel power unit as a func- tion of flue gas temperature Fluegaspowerdelivered,kW/MWpa Flue gas temperature, °C Flue gas cooling Flue gas condensation 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Flue gas dew point Fuel moisture content 50% Residual oxygen 5% vol. in dry flue gas Flue gas initial temperature 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190 Wood chips Peat
  • 15. water led to the scrubber so that the condensation point can be reached re- gardless of the network load and other external conditions.   In a traditional scrubber, the return temperature forces the final flue gas temperature to be 3–5 °C higher than the return temperature. For example, if the return temperature is 55 °C, the minimum final temperature of flue gas- es can be 58 °C.   Using a heat pump connection, the return temperature of district heat- ing water can be reduced by 20 °C, in which case, according to the previous example, the return temperature of dis- trict heating water would be 35 °C and the minimum final temperature of flue gases would be 38 °C.   However, the thermal energy of the return water is not lost in the cooling process. It is transferred to the con- denser via the pump’s thermal sub- stance and returned to the district heating network. The energy trans- ferred using the heat pump simply passes the scrubber connection.   In more advanced applications, only the exact volume of the network’s re- turn water needed by the scrubber is conducted, in which case the heat pump can be dimensioned optimally for the investment.   In the aforementioned example, ad- ditional cooling of 20 °C is significant considering the recovery of energy. If peat with a humidity of 35% was used as a fuel and the residual oxygen of the flue gases was 5% by volume, the flue gas dew point temperature would have been 57 °C. In such cases, a tradi- tional scrubber cannot reach the dew point, which means that additional wa- ter is needed in the process.   The regulatory circuit and heat pump connection described above enable a significant increase in the scrubber’s heat recovery capacity and improve the heating plant’s energy ef- ficiency, especially in extreme cold.   The use of heavy fuel oil can be re- duced significantly, which guarantees a short payback time for investments. Currently, payback times of even 2–3 years have been reached in invest- ments where heavy fuel oil has been replaced by a scrubber solution with a heat pump connection. (See Figure 3.) About the authors Juha Järvenreuna M.Sc. (Automation Systems) Juha Järvenreuna started as the CEO of Caligo Industria Oy in August 2013. He has mainly worked at Tel- este Oyj in management positions in production, product develop- ment and product and service oper- ations. In addition, Juha has worked at DHL International Oy and Nokia Networks Oy. The majority of his work experience has been gained in international operations. juha.jarvenreuna@caligoindustria.com Mika Nummila M.Sc. (Energy Engineering) Mika Nummila has worked in con- sultancy and design tasks in process and energy engineering since 1993. In 2005–2012, Nummila worked as a design manager in the process in- dustry at Elomatic Oy, being respon- sible for the Jyväskylä unit’s pro- cess department. Since 2013, he has worked as a technology manager at Caligo Industria Oy. Nummila spe- cialises in heat transfer, energy effi- ciency and flue gas scrubbers. mika.nummila@caligoindustria.com Thermalpower,MW Time, h 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Boiler + scrubber Boiler 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000
  • 16. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  16  |  17 Virtualisation of automation systems – a brave new world Photo©AndrewOstrovsky/depositphotos.com
  • 17. Automation has developed at a rapid pace in recent times. The surge in development has seen automation suppliers and com- ponent manufacturers for pro- cess control launch new genera- tions of process controllers and bus and I/O components on the market. The use of ICT technology and databases has increased in distributed control system (DCS). This increasing use dictates that we to come up with new ways of efficiently utilising the compu- tational power and opportuni- ties computers present. ICT virtu- alisation can achieve significant savings in the delivery of auto- mation systems and in produc- ing high levels of system flexibil- ity and usability.
  • 18. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  18  |  19 Virtualisation refers to the use of virtual computers in one or more servers, the physical resources of which are jointly used by the virtual comput- ers with the use of virtualisation soft- ware (Hypervisor). A virtual machine is a program-based object which corre- sponds to a physical computer in terms of logic and functionality.   Usually the end user uses a virtual machine via a terminal which is con- nected through a remote connec- tion, such as Remote Desktop Proto- col (RDP). Virtualisation technology has rapidly become popular in the IT office environment and is currently finding a home in ITC process automation.   Development work and tests con- ducted at Elomatic on the use of vir- tualisation technology in automation systems indicate that ICT virtualisation is indeed possible and the results are very promising.   The development team’s vision of an implementation strategy for auto- mation systems is depicted in Figure 2. It shows the most essential parts of the DCS implementation with the use of virtualisation. The device imple- mentation differs from that shown in Figure 1 because the usability require- ments differ between the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and Process Control Net- work (PCN). This has an impact on du- plication, which means that a single blade server can be used in the DMZ. In the PCN, a cluster needs to be built of separate servers and Network Added Storage (NAS) drives located in differ- ent places. The DCS servers of a large ship’s control system and other critical IT components are, for example, locat- ed in different parts of the ship. More licences but less hardware A basic cost analysis has shown that in virtualised systems the share of li- cences increases and that of hardware decreases. The reason is that the man- agement of a virtualisation solution re- quires a new software platform and software licences. A redundant NAS im- plementation, for example, requires not only special hardware, but also soft- ware for a high availability (HA) net- work drive. See Figure 3.   In virtualised systems several com- puters and servers are replaced by a few more powerful servers and op- erator terminals, so that the quantity equals the number of desktop comput- ers. In addition to software and hard- ware changes, the system changes in terms of management, maintenance, usability and its expandability. For ex- ample, the migration of a virtual ma- chine is only possible in a virtual envi- ronment, and the use of migration in maintenance improves flexibility and efficiency. In other words, the diversity of the new system structure improves efficiency and user-friendliness. Total cost ownership (TCO) The total cost of ownership for the au- tomation life cycle plays an important role when analysing the use of virtuali- sation technology. The initial costs may be higher, but no further hardware and software upgrades are required for the automation system, which means that ▼▼ Figure 1. A common distributed con- trol system (DCS) implementation Operator Stations Operator StationsApplication Station DCS Servers DCS Process Controllers QCS Controller Ethernet 3rd party Process Controllers ServersOPC 2xCPU CPU CPU CPU CPUPower Power Power Power PowerI/O I/O I/O I/O I/O QCS Advanced Control 3rd party Enterprise Network DMZ PCN
  • 19. About the author Vladimir Pöyhönen B.Sc. (Automation and ICT) Vladimir Pöyhönen joined Elomatic in 2012 and works as an Automation Expert at the Elomatic Helsinki of- fice. He is specialised in automation, ICT, virtualisation and marine auto- mation integration. Before joining Elomatic Vladimir worked at Pöyry in instrumentation and project co- ordination and at Honeywell in sales support and project management. vladimir.poyhonen@elomatic.com ▼▼ Figure 3. StarWind iSCSI NAS imple- mentation ▲▲ Figure 2. DCS implementation concept with use of virtualisation the TCO is significantly lower than that of a traditional implementation.   This factor cannot be ignored, and as a result, large automation suppli- ers have, in recent years started to of- fer partly-virtualised solutions. Honey- well stands out from other suppliers as it also offers HA solutions for virtualisation. This technology guarantees flexible and cost-effective automation deliveries.   Automation companies need to keep up with the changing world. Vir- tualisation expertise and specialisation delivers far superior benefits compared with traditional approaches. It provides companies that embrace these tech- nologies with a clear advantage as they are able to serve their customers in an entirely new way, for example, in auto- mation system procurement and im- plementation. Learning new concepts as well as developing and applying what was learnt are vital skills in the modern world.
  • 20. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  20  |  21 Safety is a topic on everyone’s lips. When users make a mistake or in- terpret a critical matter incorrect- ly, they may hurt themselves or damage the environment. The root cause of an incident may be non- compliance with instructions, incor- rectly remembered procedures or a lack of attention – i.e. a human er- ror. By analysing the working envi- ronment more closely, an error can sometimes be revealed as the result of logical thinking or foreseeable ac- tions, which could have been avoid- ed if the working environment had been well designed. Agood working environment is comprehensible, where users, such as control room operators, can easily obtain the information they need from the environment and user inter- faces, interpret it and act correctly. In fact, the user interface in itself should act as a guideline structure, providing instructions for correct working pro- cedures. This is affected by the design of different elements in the working environment, and the logicality, con- sistency and informativeness of user interfaces.   Separate instructions and signs are usually necessary, but all too often fail- ures in design are patched up by sim- ply providing additional instructions. This type of working environment stresses employees unnecessarily. If the environment is not intuitive to users, i.e. naturally understandable, it places a strain on perception and memory ca- pacity and causes inference difficulties. Because a human’s brainwork-related cognitive capacity is limited, there is a greater risk of human error occurring. Human errors – are they avoidable? Errors made by users can be divided roughly into two groups. We all make faulty choices and deductions every now and then, even if the correct so- lution is clearly observable and easily interpreted. Preventing these kinds of errors is practically impossible.   However, there is another group of situations where users need to act re- lying excessively on their memory, or Humanerrors – usability as a safety factor in working environments Photo 2014 © Depositphotos.com/ndoeljindoel
  • 21. so that a feature in the environment or user interface activates the wrong op- erating model. This latter group of er- rors can be affected by the design of the working environment.   Working environments and their user interfaces should progress logical- ly for their users and be consistent for the actions required. Instead of using technical language, information should be understandable to users. This also refers to the use of clear and under- standable symbols.   In order to be in control of their work, users need to receive correctly timed feedback from the systems they are using. Working should not strain our short-term memory, also known as working memory, to an unreason- ably high extent. Separate instructions are needed in many cases but written instructions are not an efficient means to patch up defective usability found in user interfaces. We should first think how users could be guided towards the correct action by developing user interface features without resorting to separate instructions. Safer working through usability design In a technical sense, we are working hard to make the working environment safe. Examples include the Atex safety requirements set for safety-critical envi- ronments, which define technical solu- tions and material choices acceptable for various categories of work premises. Similarly, machine safety regulations include a large group of requirements related to various sorts of protection.   Technically speaking, we can never build a completely safe working envi- ronment. For example, gaps need to be left in automatic safety mechanisms in the process industry. There are many areas and situations where operators need to be able to make decisions and have an impact on the process. Emer- gency states are a completely separate area in this regard.   When planning working environ- ments, safety-critical ones in particu- lar, we need to see people as human actors. In practical development pro- jects, the user’s point of view and hu- man factors are coupled with technical design and user interface design.   The design is also tested with end users before the final implementation stage. In other words, procedures of user psychology and system usability supplement technical safety solutions. They form a single layer in a “sieve”, which serves to prevent critical errors and verify safe operations. Working en- vironments can be developed control- lably when the user perspective is con- sidered throughout the design process.   There are ways to reduce human er- ror. Through working environment and user interface design, we can have an impact on the probability and frequen- cy of unintentional errors being made. About the author Harri Hytönen B.Sc. (Wellness Technology) Harri Hytönen graduated as an engi- neer from the Wellness Technology degree programme at the Jyväsky- lä University of Applied Sciences in 2002. After graduating, he has worked in research and develop- ment in the field of user-centred de- sign, and as an educator. He has ex- perience in product documentation and quality and development engi- neering. In addition to his engineer’s degree, he has a degree in the de- sign field. Currently, Hytönen works at Elomatic as a product engineer in charge of usability. harri.hytonen@elomatic.com A good working environment is comprehensible, where users can easily obtain information, interpret it and act correctly. Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/DmitryKalinovsky Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/Uatp12 Photo2014©Depositphotos.com/RobertGerhardt
  • 22. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  22  |  23 Air tightness testing   for biosafety level 3 In search of an international standard and sound practice The Elomatic Magazine  ·  22  |  23
  • 23. All bio-containment guidelines and inspection documents set require- ments for airtight containment boundaries around biohazards. Current international containment guidelines only scratch the surface for biosafety level 3 (BSL-3) and the available tests proposed are not entirely suitable for such facilities. Some steps in the right direction have been taken, notably as out- lined in the standards put forth in the Australia-New Zealand mod- el for their Physical Containment 3 designation. ©2013WavebreakMediaLtd
  • 24. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  24  |  25 There are several reasons why air- tight containment boundaries are required, the most obvious of which is that they prevent the escape of air- borne biohazards. A much less obvious function is that they also prevent the escape of the decontamination gases or vapours used. These gases and va- pours are, in fact, the most likely dan- gerous airborne agents.   Key questions regarding what ex- actly constitutes acceptable leakage levels, however, have to be answered before quantitative testing can be- come the standard. Until then qualita- tive methods will see continued use.   One of the principle requirements of BSL-3 is ensuring inward airflow into a contained area from a less contained area. This can generally be achieved by maintaining the facility under neg- ative pressure with respect to the at- mosphere, using two interlocked door airlocks at the containment bounda- ries and pressure cascading, etc. The effectiveness of all measures depends directly on the integrity of the room / facility.   Guidance with regards BSL-3 con- tainment barrier integrity is relatively superficially provided by the“Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Lab- oratories”(BMBL) guidelines. According to the BMBL‘surfaces should be sealed’ and‘openings should be capable of be- ing sealed to facilitate space decon- tamination’. In addition, there are no criteria for verifying that these condi- tions have been met in the BMBL or in any official certification BSL-3 checklist. Pressure Decay Test not suitable for BSL-3 validation Methods to validate the air leakage of a containment boundary can be clas- sified into two main categories: quali- tative and quantitative. The only quan- titative test prescribed in the U.S. and Canada is the Pressure Decay Test. However, the Pressure Decay Test is not well suited to BSL-3 performance validation.   The Pressure Decay Test is an ex- treme test in that it represents the highest standard for room integrity in the U.S. and Canada. It is designed for BSL-3Ag/BSL-4 containment construc- tion validation, which is historically constructed with specialized and very expensive high performance contain- ment barrier systems. Typical methods for constructing a BSL-3 space will not pass the Pressure Decay Test criteria and the risks associated with aerosol hazards in a BSL-3 space do not war- rant constructing barriers that will pass this test either.   Without a relevant quantitative test to use, the most common methods of testing BSL-3 barriers are qualitative tests designed to find and fix holes in the barrier. That is pretty sound logic overall, but the devil is in the details and in how one records those details in the course of a construction project. Identifying air leakage The two most common methods of identifying air leaks are smoke testing and soap bubble testing. Regrettably, there is no guidance or consensus on what parameters should be used to perform these tests. The parameters have to be defined on a case by case basis via laboratory operations and fail- ure scenarios. ◄◄ Room impermeability tests
  • 25. 10 000 000 1 000 000 100 000 10 000 1000 100 10 1 0,1 0,01 AAHL Canadian USDA Value of Leakage Coefficient – Beta (m³/Pa.s) AirLeakageRate(l/min)at200Pa 1.0E-01 1.0E-02 1.0E-03 1.0E-04 1.0E-05 1.0E-06 1.0E-07 1.0E-08 1.0E-09 Recommended maximum PC3-PC4 leakage rate Negative pressure flexible film isolator Recommended: Desired BSL-3/4 range for Australian facilities USDA: Desired rate for BSL-3Ag facilities Canadian: National Microbiology Laboratory, Winnipeg (BSL-3Ag, BSL-4) AAHL: Australian Animal Health Center, Geelong (BSL-3Ag) ▼▼ Air leakage rates at 200 Pa differential pressure
  • 26. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  26  |  27 AS/NZS 2243.3:2010 guidelines The only current quantitative tests in practice for BSL-3 have been devel- oped in Australia and New Zealand for their Physical Containment 3 (PC3) des- ignation. These tests are relatively sim- ple to execute and do not subject con- tainment level 3 rooms to pressures they are not designed to withstand. (Level 3 rooms are tested at 0.8”200 Pa pressure difference.)   The standard has been developed to set acceptable leakage rates appro- priate for containment level 3 that are achievable with common construc- tion systems, i.e. drywall or sandwich panel constructions with appropriate penetration details. Careful attention to joints and penetrations is required for the rooms to pass the test. Normal workmanship for non-containment spaces will not suffice. Spaces that pass the test criteria are considered capable of gaseous fumigation and secondary containment protection.   Details regarding tests for leak tight- ness (BSL-3Ag and BSL-3) and the room leak tightness test (Pressure Decay test BSL-3AG) are provided in tables 1 and 2. Practical difficulties and limitations of current testing methods Acceptance criteria for all leakage test- ing methods are defined for single rooms with sturdy constructions, a lim- ited number of penetrations (for duct- ing, electrical cables, doors, view panels etc.) and airtight view panels as well as airtight doors.   It is feasible to qualify of single room laboratory or one animal room with air- tight doors, but if you are testing a BSL- 3 laboratory facility that consists of sev- eral laboratory rooms connected with a BSL-3 corridor, the laboratory door is not airtight. The doors on a BSL-3 con- tainment barrier are airtight, but inter- nal doors normally leak. While testing for leakage, single rooms with leaking doors need to be qualified. The accept- ance criteria cannot be met unless the non-airtight door/doors is/are sealed with adhesive tape or sealant.   For large rooms with multiple doors, large surface areas and several pen- etrations it is difficult to fulfil the ac- ceptance criteria. It is necessary to de- fine the acceptance criteria in terms of litres/min per square meters of the room’s surface area.   In pressure decay testing the test is sensitive to changes in the ambient temperature during the course of the test. Therefore, an appropriate correc- tion factor has to be applied that con- siders the temperature before and af- ter the test.   The Australia-New Zealand model (AS/NZS 2243.3:2010) provides a com- mon approach and platform for de- signers, builders, and owners to en- gage, deliver, and qualify the facility. The standard is meant to ensure that containment laboratories are designed and constructed to perform their functions safely and consistently, to a standard that is deemed appropri- ate and fit for the purpose by an inde- pendent body.   The Australia-New Zealand model can be improved upon with a more evidence-based rationale for perfor- mance requirements. What level of air leakage at a given pressure correlates to a safe measure of containing haz- ardous gases in likely scenarios? Is the acceptable leakage amount depend- ant on room volume or the same for all room sizes? Answering these ques- tions, as well as identifying the relation- ship of airtightness to the reduction in The basic procedure for room air leakage testing under negative pres- sure for BSL-3Ag and BSL-3 according to AS/NZS 2243.3:2010 is as follows:   Air leakage can be quantified by using an equilibrium pressure/flow test. For smaller rooms a vacuum cleaner connected to the supply or exhaust duct by a hose and a control valve can be used. For larger rooms a blower may be required. 1. This test usually involves the intro- duction of clean, dry compressed air into the space while monitoring the pressure in the space through separate pressure tapping (a vac- uum cleaner with a hose and inte- grated anemometer could be used for low leakage rates). 2. When the pressure is stabilized at the required test pressure (200 Pa), the inflow of air required to main- tain this pressure is measured us- ing a flow meter such as a variable gap meter. 3. The leakage is then recorded in li- tres per minute. 4. Prior to the test care needs to be taken to ensure that all sources of air or gas pressure within the space are isolated. Doors should be taped with PVC tape and physically restrained to prevent movement under the positive room pressure. This test can also be performed by extracting air from the room, thus placing the room under negative pressure. Acceptance criteria Leakage must be < 20 litres per min- ute for BSL 3Ag, and < 200 litres per minute for BSL 3. All instruments should be appropriately calibrated by an accredited laboratory. Table 1: Leak tightness testing – BSL-3Ag and BSL-3
  • 27. risk of airborne pathogen release, even in a qualified way, would take us a long way towards setting a standard that is rational and defendable and which will satisfy industrial, regulatory, and public interests.   Until that exists, we can do what is reasonable to ensure sound and ap- propriate laboratories, which I believe means qualitative testing with well- considered test protocols based on what the laboratory is intended for. As we perform these tests and share the outcomes we will build a common ap- proach and standard that will begin to standardize this important contain- ment protective measure. References 1. Australian/New Zealand Standard per AS/NZS 2243.3:2010 2. Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories – U.S. De- partment of Health and Human Ser- vices About the author Milind Shinde B.E. (Mechanical Engineering) Milind Shinde has over 10 years’ex- perience in Pharmaceutical and Bi- opharmaceutical projects. He has conceptualized and executed many projects for protein purification, vac- cines, OSD, LVP, sterile API and for- mulation, as well as fill & finish. Over the past 10 years, he has worked with prestigious organizations such as Reliance Life Sciences and with leading consultancy firms executing projects, among others, for Baxter (USA), ShreyaLife Sciences, Reliance Pharmaceuticals, DaburPharmaceu- ticals. He currently works as a pro- ject manager at Elomatic Pharmalab Consulting & Engineering Pvt. Ltd in Mumbai, India. milind.shinde@elomatic.com “Until a rational and defendable standard exists we can only do what is reasonable to ensure sound and appropriate laboratories.” For pretesting, an initial pressure of 125 to 250 Pa is recommended to identify major leaks.   For certification the basic proce- dure for room pressure decay test- ing under negative pressure is as fol- lows: 1. Isolate the area by closing and se- curing all doors, valves and bub- ble tight dampers at the contain- ment barrier (avoid temporary sealing measures indoors, win- dows and services that would cov- er permanent seals); plug all pres- sure sensor lines, e.g. magnehelic gauges. 2. Install a calibrated inclined ma- nometer across the containment barrier so that it is not affected by air distribution. The minimum ac- curacy of the manometer should be 10 Pa (0.05 in. w.g.) and capable of reading pressure up to 750 Pa. 3. Install a ball valve in the piping be- tween the vacuum pump/fan and the room to allow the room to be sealed once the test pressure has been attained. 4. Connect a vacuum source to the room and create a 500 Pa nega- tive pressure differential; allow the room to stabilize and close the valve between the vacuum pump/ fan and the room to seal room at 500 Pa. 5. Dynamically trend pressure loss starting at 500 Pa negative pres- sure differentials; record the dif- ferential pressure at 1 minute in- tervals for 20 minutes. 6. If repeat test is required, allow for a 20 minute waiting period. 7. Disconnect the vacuum pump/fan and open the ball valve slowly to allow room pressure to return to normal. Acceptance criteria Two consecutive tests with a mini- mum 250 Pa (1 in.w.g.) loss of pres- sure from an initial 500 Pa (2 in. w.g.) over a 20 minute period. All in- struments should be appropriately calibrated by an accredited labora- tory. Table 2: Room leak tightness test (Pressure Decay test BSL 3Ag)
  • 28. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  28  |  29 The need for the contained handling and processing of pharmaceutical materials and pathogens is on the rise due to the increased focus on health and safety and the growing interest in the development of High Potency Active Pharmaceutical In- gredients (HPAPIs). A wide range of containment equipment is available on the market to meet the process- ing and operational needs of devel- opment and manufacturing. Select- ing suitable equipment, however, requires an in-depth understand- ing of containment aspects in order to avoid operational hazards and large capital investments resulting from an ‘oversizing’ approach. In containment equipment selection the focus is on preventing the per- sonnel from being exposed to hazard- ous substances. The equipment can- not, however, fully prevent exposure. It is thus important to ensure that expo- sure through containment equipment over the operational course of time is less than the product/pharmaceutical material exposure limit.   The selection of suitable contain- ment equipment requires a thorough understanding of product and equip- ment related exposure limits. Product exposure limit The product exposure limit is defined in terms of the occupational expo- sure limit (OEL), which is calculated based on the No Observable Effect Level (NOEL). The NOEL value is ob- tained by testing the pharmaceutical material on the species with daily dos- age increases until the observable ef- fect or reaction can be seen. The OEL can thus be calculated with the fol- lowing formula: OEL = NOEL × BW V × SF1 × SF2 OEL: Occupational exposure limit NOEL: No Observable Effect Level BW: Body weight of the humans V: Volume of breath per human per day (8–10m³/8-hour of shift) SF1 and SF2: Safety factors for estab- lishing a correlation between species and individuals if data for the humans is not available. Containment Engineering – A systematic approach to handle highly potent active ingredients and pathogens
  • 29. ◄◄ Figure 1. Containment is the isolation of a product or pharmaceutical ma- terials from personnel and the envi- ronment or vice versa with the use of a physical barrier. ▼▼ Figure 2. The appropriate contain- ment system for each process is based on the quantity of materials, the occu- pation health hazard posed, the dura- tion of the task and the physical form the handled materials. Containedbarrier Product Area Product Protection Personnel Area Environmental Area Product Containedbarrier Product Area Personnel/Environmental Protection Personnel Area Environmental Area Product Moderate isolation e.g. down flow booths or high containment screens Open system e.g. engineered ventilation High isolation e.g. barrier isolators Closed system e.g. barrier isolators or RABS Quantity Kilograms Maximum Milligrams Minimum Highly disperseSlurry Task duration Exposure risk Occupational hazard Agglomerated Physical form Mild/reversible Severe/irreversible
  • 30. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  30  |  31 Equipment exposure limit The exposure limit of the equipment can only be determined through air sampling procedures and then ana- lysing the collected airborne particle samples. This amount is then divided by the volume of air sampled and the sampling time to give the Time Weight- ed Average (TWA) values of the expo- sure limit.   The TWA for evaluating pharmaceu- tical material is defined for 15 min as the Short Term Time Weighted Aver- age (STTWA) and for 8 hours as the Long Term Time Weighted Average (LTTWA). Correlation between OEL and TWA Containment equipment needs be de- signed or selected in order to achieve LTTWA < OEL. The LTTWA can also be obtained from the STTWA considering the actual exposure time in the opera- tional shifts. For example, the general industrial shift duration is 8 hours and the STTWA values for an exposure time of 15 min are available, then LTTWA based on STTWA can be calculated as follows. LTTWA = STTWA × NoC × DF 32 TWA: Time Weighted Average LTTWA: Long Term TWA STTWA: Short Term TWA NoC: Number of cycles DF: Dilution Factor ▼▼ Table 1: Isolation methods Particulars Down Flow Booths High Containment Screens Restricted Barrier Access Systems (RABS) Barrier Isolators Flow direction Unidirectional flow through ceiling HEPA NA Flow through clean room air circulation system or dedicated air filtration and conditioning system Uncompromised continu- ous flow through supply and return HEPA of dedi- cated air filtration and conditioning system OEL levels of material handled Highest High Moderate Least Health Hazard level Mild Moderate High Severe Level of Isolation Least Moderate High Highest Level of Automation Least NA High Highest Application Effective protection when handling dusty material. Effective way of boasting down flow booth capa- bilities. Physical barrier between operators and produc- tion areas but barrier is limited. Uncompromised con- tinuous isolation of its interior and external en- vironment, including sur- rounding clean room and personnel. Air flow carries the mate- rial away from the breath- ing zone of the operator into the low exhaust grill. Effective solution for air suits due to operational constraints. System’s interior atmos- phere can be controlled however pressure control is limited. Effective pressure control in the interior of the sys- tem. Classification Recirculatory Booths Once Through Booths NA Passive Open RABS Ac- tive Open RABS Pas- sive Closed RABS Active Closed RABS Positive Isolator Negative Isolator NA: Not Applicable HEPA: High Efficiency Particulate Filter
  • 31. A factor of 32 is used as there are four cycles of 15 minutes in an hour and the dilution factors is available data for STTWA for a 100% concentration of pharmaceutical material.   The containment equipment should as such be selected so that LTTWA is lower than the product-specific OEL. Equipment evaluation The selected equipment can be evalu- ated by considering a worst case sce- nario where LTTWA = OEL and then calculating the STTWArequired from the aforementioned formula as follows: STTWArequired = OEL × 32 NoC × DF TWA: Time Weighted Average STTWA: Short Term TWA NoC: Number of cycles DF: Dilution Factor The containment equipment can then be physically tested through appro- priate methods to evaluate the fol- lowing: STTWA < STTWArequired Methods of isolation and selection As indicated earlier the OEL of phar- maceutical materials is the basis for the selection of the containment level required for processing the material. Thus, as the OEL limit shows a tenden- cy towards lower values a more sophis- ticated level of isolation is required to carry out the safe processing of the pharmaceutical material.   The different types of isolation meth- ods available are provided in Table 1. The appropriate isolation method is se- lected based on the criticality of the material handled or processed. In es- sence it is based on the OEL, the physi- cal characteristics of the materials, the quantity handled and the duration of pharmaceutical material processing. See Figure 2 on page 29. Proper selection and meeting owner’s requirements HPAPI is currently one of the fastest growing segments in the pharmaceu- tical industry, with a growth rate of 8 to 10 per cent. This high growth rate is attributed to their application in the formulation of high potent drugs used to combat some of the severest dis- eases. The market opportunities and treatment capabilities have resulted in the increased interest shown by phar- maceutical companies in investing in the development and manufacturing of HPAPI.   Handling these materials, however, requires sophisticated isolation meth- ods, which demands an understanding of the basic concepts of containment engineering. This understanding assists in the proper selection of the suitable isolation method thereby meeting the operational and financial requirements of the owner. The selection of suitable containment equipment requires a thorough understanding of product and equipment related exposure limits. About the author Vishal Bundele B.Sc. (Chemical Engineering) Vishal Bundele works as Execu- tive Engineer, Process at Elomatic Pharmalab Consulting & Engineer- ing Pvt Ltd in Mumbai, India. He has strong know-how in pharmaceuti- cal project phases such as installa- tion, commissioning, qualification and validation. At Elomatic he has, among others, been involved in the re-validation of the oncology prod- uct manufacturing (small volume parentals) facility at Mylan Laborato- ries Ltd. in Vishakhapatnam. vishal.bundele@elomatic.com
  • 32. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  32  |  33 The 2004/40/EC European Union Directive governs the minimum health and safety requirements with regards workers’ exposure to electromagnetic fields. Overexpo- sure to electromagnetic fields can have detrimental health effects and employers, as such, are responsible for taking preventative measures to protect workers in this regard. With the help of computational electro- magnetics the exact interaction be- tween electromagnetic fields and physical objects and the environ- ment can be established. Making use of this technology not only en- sures the health of workers, but can also reduce costs in the process. Electric fields are caused by voltage differences and therefore powerful electric fields are often found in close proximity to high current power lines. Powerful magnetic fields, on the other hand, commonly occur near industrial transformers, welding devices or induc- tion heaters.   According to the directive any elec- tromagnetic field in excess of 500 micro Teslas (at 50Hz frequency) is a health risk. This is due to the fact that high voltage lines induce an electrical charge inside the human body while low frequency (below 50Hz) time-var- ying magnetic fields induce internal electromagnetic fields and circular cur- rents. This can lead to internal warming of the body and result in several de- bilitating symptoms. High frequency dryers that use microwaves can cause warming on the body surface. Lower frequency waves penetrate deeper into the skin and cause more damage than higher frequency waves.   Employees with pacemakers are par- ticularly vulnerable to electromagnetic radiation and should not be exposed to electromagnetic fields in excess of 100 micro Teslas. Low frequency magnetic fields are also known to interfere with the functioning of pacemakers and my lead to pacemaker malfunction.   It is worth noting that many apart- ment buildings are located near high power transmission lines, while work- stations are sometimes also placed in close proximity to high power trans- formers. Humans that use those spaces are potentially placed at risk of overex- posure to electromagnetic fields.   Overexposure can cause headaches, nausea, depression, hyperactivity and skin redness to name a few of the most common symptoms. Computational Electromagnetics – simulating the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields
  • 33. Employing shields to reduce exposure The magnetic field caused by a trans- former decreases considerably the fur- ther away one is from the transformer in question. When a human is close enough to the source of the electro- magnetic radiation shields need to be employed to reduce the exposure to acceptable levels.   A common misconception is that concrete walls provide sufficient shield- ing, but this is simply not the case. In order to effectively reduce exposure levels, lead plates and grounded steel nets have to be employed. The dimen- sioning, positioning and material com- position of shields have clear cost im- plications and this is where technical analysis tools come in handy to find optimal solutions. Computational electromagnetics simulates exposure levels Computational electromagnetics can be used to simulate the effects of elec- tromagnetic fields and the effective- ness of shielding devices. It allows de- signers to define the optimal shield thickness, positioning and materi- als used by testing, for example, how transformers in different positions af- fect the surrounding environment.   The simulation provides the designer with a clear view of no-go areas for em- ployees. This ensures that the shields employed are optimally proportioned not to take up unnecessary space, but sufficient to maintain exposure at safe levels.   In order for the simulation to be run the average power load and technical data of the transformer is required as well as the building dimensions and the materials that the transformer and building are made of. Typical simulation takes a few days The analysis can be conducted, for ex- ample, with the ANSYS Maxwell soft- ware package. The modelling for a typical site usually takes a few days depending on the size of the site, the number of transformers and how close together or far apart they are. The scope of the study naturally also af- fects the time required; are magnetic fields or electrical fields being studied or both, and are the shield positions and dimensions also covered etc?   The information gathered during simulation can be used by employers to remove or reduce health risks effec- tively and reduce costs by ensuring op- timized installations.   A safer working environment and one that complies with the applicable EU directive reduces sick leave, work accidents and other harmful effects. The result is a win-win situation both for employer and employee. Link to EU directive: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do ?uri=OJ:L:2004:184:0001:0009:EN:PDF About the author Kari Haimi M.Sc. (Electrical Engineering) Kari Haimi graduated as a gradu- ate engineer from the Tampere Uni- versity of Technology in 2013. He started working at Elomatic in 2012. His expertise area is technical analy- sis and he has particular know-how in the technical analysis of electro- magnetic fields. kari.haimi@elomatic.com Photo©2014DmitryKalinovsky
  • 34. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  34  |  35 When offering product and service solutions, many details need to be taken into consideration from cus- tomer needs and ideas to produc- tion and launch on the market. The core competence of product design and development needs to be sup- plemented by expertise in the stra- tegic development of services and business operations. Motivated mul- ti-industrial professional teams pro- duce the best results. The will to cre- ate solutions that are sustainable and purposeful is of particular im- portance, while the time spent on and the risks associated with de- velopment must be minimised to create new space for new innova- tion. The innovative capacity of new products is what puts you ahead of your competitors. Management and leadership of creativity and innovative capaci- ty is the responsibility of business man- agement, but every employee can play a part. Innovation can be defined as the organisation’s ability to build new features that improve competitiveness (products, production processes, busi- ness ideas, services, etc.). This requires specific working methods.   The innovative capacity of an or- ganisation is built on three founda- tions: atmosphere (a working culture that encourages innovation), chan- nels (innovation process, team, etc.) and guidance (innovation direction). Real innovation refers to a new prod- uct or service that revolutionises the market. Creativity and Method – the cornerstones of success
  • 35.   Creativity is a key factor in innova- tion and often the most crucial one. The core of innovation lies at the very beginning of the innovation process where numerous ideas must be gen- erated. Selected ideas are turned into product development, strategies, new markets, production development and personal development.   Product features and usability are not created by themselves, but they need systematic action at the very first stages of product development. User- centred design provides product de- velopment with the means to build good product usability. As a result of good user-centred design, product de- velopment is more controlled. It results in end products that are more effective, pleasant and safer to use. At the same time, costs related to product launch and use are lowered. The further the product development progresses, the more expensive any product chang- es are as capital is tied to the product throughout the process. Usability is not just a topping that can be added to a finished product.   Product and user segmentation ensures that the visual appearance of the product is purposeful and well planned.The product appearance must communicate its purpose, method, en- vironment and users in as much de- tail as possible. During a brainstorming session the idea is to come up with var- ious design ideas and different techni- cal solutions. As the process progresses, the most feasible ideas will be selected for further development.   The product concept or prototype already includes the new product’s technical features and dimensions in relation to the product’s appearance and usability. A well-designed product Res earch Inno vation Strategic Planning Produc tisation Product and Service Development Achieve the true value of innovative capacity ■■ By rewarding people or teams that have made im- provements or produced something significant. ■■ By performing regular mea- surements. Measurement and analysis of results focus on a single point. ■■ By making the best represent- atives into everyday he- roes. Creating hero tales and spreading them through inter- nal communications channels is effective, but it is important to direct them correctly and equally. The management can also create value by keeping a topic continuously visible.
  • 36. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  36  |  37 is more attractive, desirable and more functional in terms of technology and ergonomics. Product graphics com- prise a significant part of the finished appearance. They strengthen the prod- uct image by furnishing the designed product with the company’s visual el- ements and brand. What is more, the purpose of product graphics is always to support and improve product us- ability. Required: vision, strategy and diverse competence A creative base can be expanded by a large group of experts. Experts in me- chanics, production, innovation, usa- bility and strategy, industrial design, graphic design, programming, ani- mation and application development form a productive group. By setting up innovation teams and committing ex- perts to solving various customer prob- lems and meeting expectations, true innovation can be created. This com- petence serves to produce results that secure the success and competitive- ness of industrial plants, products and services. The ultimate goal is to provide people with solutions that are sustain- able and practical.   Strategic planning usually focus- es on offering solutions for critical op- erational success factors so that they can be implemented using controlled long-term and efficient means. Strate- gic work is often allocated to products, technologies, innovation and design. It is necessary and important to respond to strategic questions when looking for the correct path towards initial devel- opment and innovation processes. The objective is to recognise opportunities for innovation or business operations. The birth of innovation and working based on systems and solutions Innovation can be, or should be, car- ried out systematically in companies. The phase preceding product develop- ment, i.e. FEI (Front End of Innovation), can be modelled and systemized to form an excellent basis for a successful product development project. Innova- tion starts from a problem, and above all, the recognition of customer needs, which together form the true starting point for innovation. Marketing Industrial Design Usability Ergonomics Simulation Technical Production Development Production Project Management M P TPD ID ID FEICustomer and environment needs
  • 37.   We can successfully approach a de- velopment challenge through system- atic thinking. We should seek answers to the following questions. What are we dealing with? What is the correct question to ask? What do we need to develop? We try to understand the cus- tomer, the user and the problem. We should perform functional analyses and product specifications.   When analysing successful innova- tion projects, one usually finds an un- derlying and well-recognised custom- er need and a well-defined problem, from which the process was initiated. Once the problem has been identi- fied, it should first be investigated, an- alysed and reshaped – in more ways than one.   There are many ways to reshape the problem. When developing a new ver- sion of an existing product, it is im- portant to analyse the good features of the product, looking at what works and what should be retained in the new version. Often, product problems are well-known, but good features may be forgotten and hidden under the sur- face.   A few leading guidelines related to the product development project offer responses to the previous questions. These may include user-centred sur- veys and technological research.   User-centred research provides un- derstanding of the product or service users’world and any of their conscious and unconscious needs. Research methods offer a means to transfer an understanding of user needs, usability, ergonomics and design to the product or service.  Through technological research we can strengthen our understand- ing and increase know-how in order to analyse the functionality and per- formance of current products and pro- duction processes. Research serves to develop existing products and process- es from a technological point of view, and to ensure that the objectives of on- going development projects are met or even exceeded.   When developing a new product, it is useful to become familiar with simi- lar products on the market and analyse their features as accurately as possi- ble. Databases also offer many solution proposals and ideas that have never been put into practice. They may con- tain feasible ideas that should be an- alysed alongside our own ideas. This saves time and money compared to a M M MP P P ID ID ID Innovation / Successful product TPD TPD TPD ProcessdiagramdesignNikoIhalainen/Elomatic “Innovation starts from a problem, and above all, the recognition of customer needs.” ▲▲ With the aid of diverse know-how the customer and the environment needs are processed into innovations and business growth
  • 38. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  38  |  39 situation where all problems are veri- fied in connection with the develop- ment project.   The starting point for all product and service development solutions is a deep understanding of custom- er needs, demands and their related functionalities. In addition, we need to understand how we can produce add- ed value for end customers through customer products and services. This means considering how we can allo- cate our resources to offer solutions that maximise this added value in the entire product and service network. By following these main principles, we can deliver various solutions for different business challenges. Introducing a refined idea to the rest of the world A refined idea must be systematically polished into a concrete product or service. The process starts from initial questions that define objectives and the operating environment and mirror our ideas and goals with respect to the target group. It requires a large group of experts to solve and plan a success- ful outcome.   By asking and answering the right questions one can achieve much. Who is the customer? What are the cus- tomer’s needs? What problem or need are we solving? How much is the cus- tomer ready to pay for the product or service? Where is the product or ser- vice available? Who are our competi- tors? What are the superior competi- tive factors of our product or service? Does our idea need protection? What kind of image should the product or service reflect?   If our resources run out, we should look for a reliable partner that can help us with the questions above. The partner may offer help in the produc- tisation of ideas, products and ser- vices.   There are partners that are involved in product and service development from the very first ideas to the launch to the market. The advantage of such an arrangement is that the partners are
  • 39. able to react thoroughly to various de- velopment needs with the help of their numerous experts.   Everything is based on product planning competence. Technical and engineering challenges are no stran- gers when it comes to product devel- opment.   By investing in integrated prod- uct development, results can be achieved through the simultaneous performance of different competence areas and project stages. The integrat- ed development model often plays a key role when refining an idea into a market product or service, while keep- ing risks and costs effectively under control.   The design of concrete products and services is supplemented by fo- cussing on the first phases in the de- velopment process. And that is where we play our role investigating, inno- vating and conceptualising the most important content solutions in order to achieve successful products and services. We refine products into ser- vices when they require control, guid- ance, maintenance or marketing. Our expertise produces the most benefits when we can solve challenges relat- ed to products and their surrounding services. About the authors Timo Piirainen B.Sc. (Production Technology) Timo Piirainen holds a Mechanical Engineering degree from the Wärt- silä Technical Acadamy from where he entered working life after gradu- ation in 1985. He has gained diverse work experience in different posi- tions in numerous product devel- opment projects over the years. His know-how also covers engineering method development, and current areas of involvement include a dig- itisation and future product devel- opment projects. Mr Piirainen joined Elomatic in 1995 and currently holds the position of Vice President, R&D Projects. timo.piirainen@elomatic.com Jukka Mikkonen B.I.D. (Industrial Design) Jukka Mikkonen has worked as an industrial designer and industrial design manager for 20 years. Dur- ing his career he has participated in over one hundred industrial design and product development projects in design and management roles. Mikkonen joined Elomatic in 2011 at works at the Elomatic Helsinki office where he is the Industrial Design Manager of the product develop- ment department. jukka.mikkonen@elomatic.com
  • 40. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  40  |  41 The barren desert environment is as far removed from Finland as it could possibly be. One should nev- ertheless not be surprised if the jet pump technology and equipment used there to pump oil to the surface is provided by a company based in Pori on the west coast of Finland. Wellquip Ltd (WQ) has quietly made a name for itself in developing state- of-the-art oil and gas production equipment packages and software (FloWQ systems) and in supplying turnkey deliveries worldwide. De- velopment of its own oil and gas surface and downhole equipment and technology began in 2004. In this article we highlight some of the development phases and techno- logical advances of this remarkable journey into the unknown. What makes WQ’s specialisation in oil and gas technology even more surprising is that Finland does not have its own oil and gas reserves and consequently the culture in this area is very thin or non-existent. There are also no faculties at Finnish universi- ties that offer studies in the field.   In 2004 WQ nevertheless took up the challenge and began studying feasible areas in oil and gas field development technology. Their efforts were focused on identifying future trends and related requirements. At the time the devel- opment team identified the need to produce wells with high paraffin, sand and gas content and the production of heavy oil as growing future needs in the FSU market.   According to Wellquip Managing Di- rector, Sakari Oja, the surface equip- ment package has been under contin- uous development since they decided to enter the field in 2004.   “In the beginning the equipment package was based mainly on foreign technology and both the analysis work to define the equipment configuration best suited for each well and the actu- al equipment was mainly contracted from the USA. We realised very soon that we needed to develop our own technology in order to gain a better understanding of related phenomena and to reduce the risks associated with dependence on external suppliers”, ex- plains Oja.   “We also needed to develop soft- ware to determine the optimal equip- ment configuration for each separate oil well. We cooperated with the Tam- pere Technical University to create our own software for this purpose.” Jet pump technology for artificial lift in oil and gas production Elomatic acquires share of Wellquip In May 2014 Elomatic acquired a share of Wellquip Ltd after which Elomatic and Wellquip’s Offshore operations were integrated. The company continues to operate un- der the Wellquip name. Wellquip provides offshore technology, oilfield solutions and services with a focus on major hydrocar- bon production regions. It has strong experience oil and gas re- lated activities in arctic offshore and demanding onshore climates. According to the agreement Elo- matic has an option to acquire a majority share in the company during 2014.
  • 41. What is artificial lift and when is it required? In oil production artificial lift is re- quired when the natural pressure in the underground oil reservoir is not sufficient to push oil to the surface in a self-flowing system. Most oil wells require artificial lift, which is generally provided by a pumping mechanism. Beam pumps are the most common and constitute about 80% of all pumps used in artificial lift production. Jet pumps are worth noting as they have no moving parts, which again means an advantage con- cerning down-time in production. How does a jet pump function? In essence a jet pump is an ejec- tor, located at the bottom of an oil well, modified for oil and gas production in order to ensure easy operation. It mainly consists of a nozzle, throat and diffusor. The working fluid from the sur- face is pumped through the noz- zle, which creates suction for pro- duced fluids. The working fluid and produced fluids are mixed in the throat after which the mixture continues through the diffusor to the surface. The nozzle/throat combination is crucial in deter- mining jet pump performance. Each oil well needs to be analysed separately and finding the opti- mum nozzle/throat combination from the 150–200 possible stand- ard and tailor-designed combina- tions with optimum equipment on the surface is a complex task. An extensive software package is re- quired to make the necessary cal- culations. ▼▼ Diagram 1. A schematic presentation of the test- ing package. Pump 1 (180 l/min 130 bar) pro- duces the working fluid flow and pressure and Pump 2 (140 l/min 80 bar) the flow and reservoir pressure of the produced fluid. Both have suction from the water tank. Gas can be added to the produced fluid from the nitrogen bottle battery before reaching the jet pump. ▲▲ The WQ laboratory testing device used to simu- late oil well features
  • 42. The Elomatic Magazine  ·  42  |  43 Testing equipment to analyse hydrodynamic flow inside jet pump In order to analyse the hydrodynam- ic flow inside a jet pump the pressure reduction factors at the nozzle, throat and diffusor for each nozzle/throat combination have to be determined. There are, however, a vast number of possible combinations and taking the required measurements is extremely time-consuming.   “For this reason we tried to identify dependencies between pump pres- sure reduction factors and other factors such as the nozzle/throat diameter ratio, spacing between the nozzle and throat, gas presence and Reynolds number etc. With the help of this information the software could automatically use the correct pressure reduction factors once the pump geometry and liquid proper- ties were defined”, Oja explains.   See diagram 1 for a detailed over- view of the test equipment setup. ▲▲ Diagram 2. The operator’s process view ▼▼ Diagram 3. The practical efficiency of the nozzle/throat combination as a function of M 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 N(M) η(M) M = produced fluid working fluid η = Jet Pump’s coefficient of efficiency N = Pressure Ratio pd – ps pi – pd , where pd = pressure after the pump, pi = pressure of liquid fed into pump ps = the pump’s suction pressure M N η 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
  • 43.   All the testing procedures were controlled with the operator’s PC. The measurements taken from 18 measur- ing points every second were saved in the PC memory. See diagram 2 for the operators process view. Overcoming challenges Initially testing produced unexpect- ed results while the automation sys- tem proved to be unstable. The cavita- tion plane had a few surprises in store for the testing team too. The work flu- id discharge pressure showed varia- tions despite the installation of pres- sure dampers. Over time the testing team’s know-how and accuracy, how- ever, increased until proper results were achieved.   “This is what engineering and re- search is all about. We had to figure out what to do and how to do it. We found solutions to all these challenges”, Oja says proudly.   The immediate test result allowed a performance curve to be drawn for the nozzle/throat combination in question. The curve showed the practical effi- ciency of the nozzle/throat combina- tion as a function of M. See diagram 3.   The next step included saving the measurements on the computer and manipulating them with a custom- made software program, which calcu- lated all the necessary pressure reduc- tion coefficients in the jet pump. An example of the measurements taken is displayed in Table 1. Software developed to select optimal equipment configuration While the measurements were being taken and results analysed the soft- ware to select the optimal subsurface and surface equipment was also de- veloped.   “The program is ready now to be used as a practical tool and it has been tested in real conditions and the re- sults are very encouraging. It contains many quality features such as vertical two-phase flow with gas compressi- bility and analyses of extreme condi- tions”, says Oja.   “Actually of most value to us now is that we know exactly how the system works. The entire development process has provided us with a deeper overall understanding of oil production. Origi- nally we thought that we would con- centrate purely on pumping the fluids from the reservoir to the surface, but we noticed very quickly that the char- acteristics of the reservoir could not be ignored. Our clients are often inter- ested in the special features of the res- ervoir, which now can be addressed and presented. We now have a better understanding of parameter influence on the system efficiency and economy. The program has been loaded onto our server and is ready for use by our cli- ents”, Oja concludes. Text: Martin Brink Sensor Time Fl 25,1 Fl 25,2 Fl 25,3 Fl 26,1 Fl 26,2 Pt 28 Pt 29 Po 30 Ps 31 Pi 33 Td 34 Ti 37 15:13:28 0 0 11,270 0 44,423 5,863 11,874 5,791 5,783 28,443 17,925 17,882 15:13:29 0 0 11,579 0 44,809 5,921 12,019 5,588 5,982 28,258 17,925 17,911 15:13:30 0 0 11,656 0 45,195 5,921 12,106 5,762 5,841 28,536 17,925 17,882 15:13:31 0 0 11,656 0 45,195 5,863 12,164 5,762 5,841 28,304 17,925 17,911 15:13:32 0 0 11,502 0 45,427 5,921 12,135 5,704 5,899 28,073 17,925 17,882 15:13:33 0 0 11,038 0 45,195 5,863 12,019 5,762 5,841 28,351 17,925 17,882 15:13:34 0 0 11,038 0 45,891 5,892 12,164 5,704 5,841 27,61 17,925 17,882 15:13:35 0 0 11,038 0 44,886 5,892 12,019 5,588 5,899 28,073 17,925 17,882 15:13:36 0 0 11,038 0 43,882 5,805 12,048 5,762 5,697 28,258 17,925 17,882 15:13:37 0 0 11,270 0 44,732 6,008 12,164 5,559 5,899 28,258 17,925 17,882 15:13:38 0 0 11,193 0 44,655 5,805 11,816 5,791 5,783 28,304 17,925 17,882 ▲▲ Table 1. An example of measurements taken (20.3.2012) from 12 sensors once a second. The location of sen- sors shown in Diagram 2.
  • 44. Scientia vires est At Elomatic we believe that our human capital is our most precious asset. With knowledge comes the power to shape the future. We continuously develop our employees’ know-how and strive to be leaders in our respective technical fields. We focus on packaging and delivering this know- how to ensure that our customers stay ahead of their competition. The Top Engineer magazine offers our experts the opportunity to share their ex- pertise and knowledge and to engage other technical experts with their writing. It is a publication by engineers, for engineers, and other technically-minded readers. www.elomatic.com In May 2014 Elomatic acquired a share of technology firm Wellquip Ltd. As a result of combining their business operations an internationally signif- icant player in the offshore business has been formed in Finland. The com- pany’s core knowhow is offshore and oil and gas production solutions and it aims in particular to achieve growth in the arctic marine business in the Rus- sian and Caspian Sea markets. Wellquip provides offshore technology and oilfield solutions and services. The company has extensive experience of the Russian and Central Asian markets.   Elomatic and Wellquip have in re- cent years cooperated actively in differ- ent business areas. They have, among others, founded a joint venture compa- ny, Caspian Offshore Solutions, in Astra- khan Russia with a Russian partner. Elo- matic and Wellquip are also currently undertaking a joint engineering project for a Caspian Sea jackup vessel.   According to the agreement Elomat- ic will initially acquire a significant mi- nority share. Elomatic has the option to acquire a majority share in Wellquip during 2014. Elomatic and Wellquip merge offshore business operations – Joint venture company aims for growth in Arctic market