VIP Mumbai Call Girls Hiranandani Gardens Just Call 9920874524 with A/C Room ...
Seminario Biologia molecular
1. 1
María Alejandra Alvarez Betin
Third semester of Medicine
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana.
Teacher: Lina Maria Martinez Sanchez.
2. Introduction
NRF2: protein that controls the way in which certain
genes are expressed, acts as the primary cellular barrier
against the harmful effects of oxidative stress by
regulating the expression of cytoprotective genes when
it is next to Protein 1 associated with EACH similar to
Kelch
β- LAPACHONE: is an ortho naphthoquinone, with
potential antineoplastic and radiosensitizing activity, is
bioactivated creating a oxidoreduction that generates
high levels of superoxide.
2
3. Introduction
TXNRD: Thioredoxin reductase is a major
antioxidant and redox regulator in mammalian
cells, it has roles in preventing and
promoting/sustaining cancer.
SOD1: this gene provides instructions for
making the enzyme superoxide dismutase.
This enzyme attaches to molecules of copper
and zinc to break down toxic, charged oxygen
molecules
6. Cell line generation
6
For what?
Used to obtain information on
the relationship between the
activation / inhibition of
different pathways and their
effects on gene expression
Basis
Stable cell lines were
generated via lentiviral
transduction for 6h. Twenty-
four hours after transduction,
puromycin was added to the
growth medium for 72 h to
select for infected cells.
KEEP1 WT
KEEP1 MUT
7. Western Blot
7
For what?
It is used to study proteins,
estimate their size and
confirm the presence of post-
translational modifications.
Basis
Electrophoresis to separate
proteins
they are transferred to the
surface of a membrane and
exposed to an antibody.
Antibody binding is detected
using a radioactive or chemical
marker.
8. Fluorescence
8
For what?
Visualization and study of the
cellular location of biological
structures that have been
previously excited
quantification and
determination of total
antioxidant capacity
Basis
distribution of an antigen in a
group of cells to direct
fluorescent markers to a
target molecule and observe
through microscopy
9. Nuclear isolation
9
For what?
studying processes such as
nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling,
and protein–chromatin or
nuclear protein–protein
interactions in response to
diverse stimuli
Basis
dissolution of the cytoplasmic
membrane, using a low
concentration of a nonionic
detergent and fast
centrifugation steps.
10. Results
10
FIG 1
KEAP1MUT cell lines
displayed uniformly high
NQO1 protein levels,
while protein levels of
NQO1 in KEAP1WT cells
were highly variable
Overexpression of
KEAP1 C273S and
NRF2 T80K led to the
accumulation of NRF2,
which promoted
resistance to β-
lapachone exposure
NRF2 silencing by
shRNAs markedly
reduced resistance to
β-lapachone in H460
cells (KEAP1MUT)(
11. 11
Results FIG 2
A time-dependent
accumulation of DNA
damage in H1299 cells
(KEAP1 WT).
KEAP1WT cells
accumulated γ-H2AX
following β-lapachone
exposure
12. 12
Results FIG 2
In H1299 cells promoted
resistance to βlapachone-
induced DNA damage and
decreased accumulation
of ROS
shRNA-mediated silencing of
NRF2 in H460 and HCC15 cells
increased γ-H2AX levels
following β-lapachone exposure
13. 13
Results FIG 3
Depletion of catalase did not
affect the β-lapachone
sensitivity of NSCLC cells.
auranofin significantly
increased β-lapachone-
induced cell death and DNA
damage in KEAP1MUT cells
14. DISCUSSION
14
Author
D. Zhang, J. Rennhack,
E.R. Andrechek, C.E.
Rockwell, K.T. Liby,
what he said
Aberrant NRF2 activation
promotes resistance to
therapeutics that rely on
the production of ROS.
Or
A.P. Lundberg, et al Isobutyl-
deoxynyboquinone (IB-
DNQ) is being developed
for clinical use
I.S. Harris, et al KEAP1MUT cells were
highly resistant to
auranofin compared to
KEAP1WT cells
15. 15
CONCLUSION
• I think it is a good investigation because it is about helping people
with cancer which is a really degenerative and complicated disease
for the patient and their family
• I consider that with the molecular biology they could realize more
studies with organisms like the B-lapachone that are not as
invasive as chemotherapy
Para examinar la influencia de las mutaciones KEAP1 / NRF2 en la respuesta de NSCLC al tratamiento con β-lapachona, evaluamos la eficacia citotóxica de β-lapachone en un panel de dieciséis líneas celulares de NSCLC, siete de las cuales se caracterizan por la activación de mutaciones de KEAP1. Además, incluimos las células InthestudyCalu3, que albergan una variante polimórfica de NQO1 (NQO1 * 3) que da como resultado niveles de enzimas 95% más bajos.
F-determinar si la resistencia a β-lapachona dependía de NRF2, las células H1299 (KEAP1WT) se infectaron con un virus que codifica una mutación inactivadora de KEAP1 (C273S) o una mutación de ganancia de función NRF2 (T80K), para promover la activación aberrante de NRF2
De acuerdo con nuestros hallazgos anteriores, la sobreexpresión de KEAP1C273S y NRF2T80K pero no KEAP1WT condujo a la acumulación de NRF2, que promovió la resistencia a la exposición a β-lapachona
G-H460 (KEAP1 MUT) infectados con virus que codifican shRNA contra NRF2 (shNRF2) o un control de shRNA, el silenciamiento de NRF2 por shRNA redujo notablemente la resistencia a β-lapachona en células H460 (KEAP1MUT) (Fig. 1G).
A continuación, evaluamos si las células KEAP1MUT estaban protegidas contra el daño del ADN inducido por β-lapachona [27,40]. Controlamos los niveles de H2A.X fosforilado (γ-H2AX), un marcador molecular sensible del daño en el ADN. Observamos una acumulación de daño de ADN dependiente del tiempo en las células H1299 (KEAP1WT), mientras que las células A549 (KEAP1MUT) no exhibieron un aumento de γ-H2AX después del tratamiento de 2 h con β-lapachona 3 μM
E- la expresión ectópica de KEAP1C273S o NRF2T80K en células H1299(WT) también promovió la resistencia al daño del ADN inducido por βlapachona y la disminución de la acumulación de ROS (Fig. 2E, F y S2A). (E) Evaluación del daño en el ADN de las células H1299 (KEAP1 WT) infectadas con un vector vacío (Control) o un virus que codifica la expresión de NRF2 T80K. A la izquierda, las células se expusieron a 2, 3 o 4 μM de β-lapachona. Niveles de proteínas de NRF2, NQO1, H2AX total (control de carga), Tubulina (control de carga) y el marcador de daño de ADNγ-H2AX (pS139)
G-
B- Ensayos de supervivencia de un panel de células NSCLC mutantes KEAP1 infectadas con virus que codifican shRNAs contra SOD1 (1, 2) o con un shRNA de control (shCTL). Las células NSCLC se trataron con vehículo (DMSO al 0,012%) o con β-lapachona 3 μM durante 2 h. La viabilidad celular se evaluó 48 h después del tratamiento. Se realizó la prueba estadística ANOVA unidireccional, seguida de la prueba de comparación múltiple de Dunnett.
D-