SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
JANUARY 2016
Australian IPO Activity in 2015
IPOWatch Australia
Great people, great resultshlb.com.au
Overview....................................................................1
IPO activity by quarter..............................................2
The road ahead.........................................................2
IPOs by market capitalisation..................................3
Sector analysis..........................................................4
IPO subscription rates..............................................5
Share price performance.........................................6
Case Study – NationalVeterinary Care Ltd............7
Reverse acquisitions.................................................8
Contents
For further information
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
Perth
Marcus Ohm
+61 8 9267 3225
mohm@hlbwa.com.au
Gold Coast
Janelle Manders
+61 7 5574 0922
jmanders@hlbgc.com.au
Melbourne
Jude Lau
+61 3 9606 3888
jlau@hlbvic.com.au
Adelaide
Pierre Van Der Merwe
+61 8 8133 5025
pvandermerwe@hlbsa.com.au
Brisbane (HLB Chessboard)
Peter Bishop
+61 7 3001 8870
pbishop@hlbchessboard.com.au
Sydney
Simon James
+61 2 9020 4000
sjames@hlbnsw.com.au
Disclaimer – The analysis presented in this report relates to all
initial public offerings that have resulted in the listing of an entity’s
securities on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”) with the
exception of property trusts, compliance and “backdoor” listings
and offers of non-equity securities.
The term “small cap” is used to refer to companies with a
market capitalisation of no more than $100 million. All analysis by
reference to market capitalisation on listing is based on the price
at which new securities were issued.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, in whole or in part,
without the prior written consent of HLB Mann Judd.
Whilst every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of
information contained in this report, we accept no liability for
any error or omission, nor for any action taken in reliance on any
statement or opinion in this report.
No statement or opinion in this report is intended to be construed
as investment advice. Properly considered professional advice
should always be sought if in doubt regarding the merits of any
investment.
Investment companies have been included in the report for
this first time this year and the prior period numbers have been
adjusted accordingly.
Wollongong
Ben Fock
+61 2 4254 6500
bfock@hlbw.com.au
1Great people, great results
There were a total of 85 new IPOs on the ASX
during 2015, which saw an increase over the
previous year in the number of new entities
gaining listed status.The 2015 total compares
favourably to 2014, when 70 new companies
listed, and the previous 5-year average of 75
listings.
The total $7.02 billion funds raised were down
on the recent record of $16.70 billion in 2014,
which was heavily influenced by two large
floats that raised $7.93 billion between them.
However, the funds raised in 2015 compare
favourably with the 5-year average of $7.05
billion.
While the 2014 year was dominated by a
number of extremely large IPOs, the activity in
2015 was more evenly balanced. Funds raised
were, however, still strongly influenced by
larger cap IPOs with 88% of funds raised by
IPOs coming from those entities with a market
capitalisation exceeding $100 million.This still
represents a significant reduction from 2014’s
total of 97% of all funds raised.
Only two entities with market capitalisations
exceeding $1 billion floated in 2015 compared
to seven in 2014.The amount raised by these
IPOs was $1.33 billion, or 19% of the total.
2015 saw a small recovery in the number of
small cap companies undergoing IPOs, with 48
listings (or 56%) coming from companies with
a market capitalisation of under $100 million.
This is an improvement on 2014 when only
43% of the 70 listings were from small cap
companies. However, the contribution from
small caps continues to lag significantly behind
the previous 5-year average of 57 companies.
It is also in stark contrast to the position
several years ago in 2012 when small cap
companies comprised 92% of all listings.
There was greater diversity in industry
sectors across new listings in 2015 with
the new market entrants coming from 21
different sectors.The technology, investments
and healthcare industries were all solidly
represented contributing 44 out of a total of 85
new listings. Predictably, resource companies
continued to perform poorly with only four
listings in the Energy and Materials sectors.
The smallest sector – comprising those
companies with a market capitalisation under
$10 million – only saw one successful listing
in 2015.This continues the experience of 2014
when only two companies listed with market
caps below $10 million.This is significantly
down on the previous 5-year average of 18
listings. Historically, this segment has been
represented by junior exploration entities,
which highlights the continuing poor investor
sentiment on the back of low commodity
prices. It is likely that any significant
improvement at this end of the IPO market is
strongly linked to a sustained recovery in the
resources sector.
First day share price performance was
generally mixed with a total of 69% of
companies recording first day gains. In terms
of year end gains, 62% of companies closed
out the year above their issue price.This is a
slight increase over 2014 when the amount of
companies recording first day gains was 55%.
Newly listed companies in 2015 outperformed
the market in general with an average increase
in share price of IPOs of 10%.This appears a
solid performance when compared against the
losses experienced across the major indices
with the ASX 200 falling by 2% over the
year and is consistent with the trend of IPOs
outperforming the indices over the past few
years.
However, subscription rates were down in
2015, relative to the previous year, with only
58 companies (or 68% of the total) meeting
their subscription targets.This is consistent
with 2013, where 65% of companies reached
their target, but down significantly on the 2014
figure of 79%.
Small cap companies (particularly those
with a market capitalisation of less than $75
million) generally found it difficult to meet
their subscription targets and subscription
rates were significantly less at lower market
capitalisations. Companies within the $50-75
million and $25-50 million brackets only raised
78% and 82% (respectively) of their targets,
while for the $10-25 million bracket the figure
was only 42%.
Although a number of companies experienced
difficulties in reaching full subscriptions, in
total new entrants raised over 91% of the total
funds sought.
Overview
Steady improvement in the IPO market for small caps
Marcus Ohm
Partner
Corporate &
Audit Services
Perth
4
3
5
3
6
5
4
7
9 9
5
25
-
5
10
15
20
25
30
-
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
7,000.00
8,000.00
January February March April May June July August September October November December
NumberofNewIssues
CumulativeFundraising($'M)
Number of Listings (RHS) Cumulative Small Cap Fundraising (LHS) Cumulative Large Cap Fundraising (LHS) Cumulative Total Fundraising (LHS)
2 www.hlb.com.au
The pipeline at the start of 2016 looks healthier than in recent years
with a number of market aspirants seeking an ASX listing. Among
those who have applied to list are biotechnology companies,
Bitcoin “miners”, a large dairy corporation and workforce solution
providers.
A total of 20 companies had applied to list on the ASX as at 31
December 2015, hoping to raise a total of $208.3 million, which
indicates that 2016 may follow on from the strong finish to 2015.
This is a stronger pipeline relative to the start of 2015 when only
14 companies had applied to list with a targeted raising of $114.0
million.
Resource stocks are still poorly represented with only four entities
seeking $15.3 million, reflecting the poor sentiment in this sector.
Approximately 23% of the funds sought are from biotechnology
and agricultural companies with six entities seeking to raise a total
of $48.5 million.Technology companies are the most prevalent
leveraging the recent success stories such as Uber and Airbnb.
There are currently seven new companies in the process of listing
in this sector, seeking $68.5 million.
It will be interesting to see the impact of the current market
volatility and economic trends on IPO activity throughout 2016 and
the extent to which small caps can demonstrate value in the IPO
process.
The road ahead...
While 2015 experienced a slow start to the
number of listings, these steadily increased
throughout the year with a strong December
quarter almost doubling the number of
IPOs during the year.This ‘rush-to-market’
phenomenon in the final quarter has been
evident over recent years and the impact of
this was significant in 2015.
At the end of the September quarter, a total
of 46 companies had listed, which is broadly
consistent with the previous few years.
However, with an additional 39 companies
listing in the final quarter of the year, this
increased the total number of listings to 85
significantly above the 70 listings of 2014.
Continuing the trend of prior years, the March
quarter was the quietest contributing only
3% of the total year’s funds or $204.7 million.
Average funds raised were also substantially
less than the other quarters at $17.0 million,
which was significantly less against the
average for the year of $82.6 million.
The final quarter was the busiest, experiencing
the highest number of listings with 39,
of which 25 occurred in December.This
compares favourably with 33 listings occurring
in the final three months of 2014. Funds raised
during this quarter, however, were significantly
down against 2014 due to the major impact
of the Medibank Private float and other large
listings in the previous year.
Several large listings occurred in the June
quarter such as MYOB ($833 million) giving
rise to an average amount of funds raised in
that quarter of $143.0 million. Even though the
June quarter only recorded 16% of the total
number of listings, almost a full third (29%)
of the amount raised for the year came about
in this quarter.
Within the small cap sector specifically, the
pattern was similar with December accounting
for 19 listings (40% of 48 total) and 46% of
the total funds raised by small caps of $827.6
million.The June quarter was more difficult for
small caps with only 9% of small cap funds
occurring in this period.
In terms of share price performance, those
small caps who listed in the March and
June quarters recorded average increases
of 35% and 39% respectively by the end of
the year, compared to small caps listing in
the September (gain of 10%) and December
quarters (loss of 13%). On average the first
day loss of those small caps which listed in
December was 27%.
IPO activity by quarter
A strong December quarter
IPO Activity by Quarter
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
AmountRaised($m)
NumberofIPOs
# of IPOs
>$100M
# of IPOs
<$100M
Amount
Raised ($M)
3Great people, great results
Largest IPOs Within Small Cap Segment in 2015
Company Name
Amount
Raised ($m)
Market
Cap ($m)
AEG ABSOLUTE EQUITY PERFORMANCE FUND
LIMITED
100.00 100.00
CIE CONTANGO INCOME GENERATOR LIMITED 71.50 71.50
XIP XENITH IP GROUP LIMITED 55.15 89.26
AWQ AROWANA AUSTRALASIAN VALUE
OPPORTUNITIES FUND LIMITED
48.11 48.11
AHX APIAM ANIMAL HEALTH LIMITED 40.00 98.48
RYD RYDER CAPITAL LIMITED 36.83 36.83
ADR ADHERIUM LIMITED 35.00 70.00
8EC 8IP EMERGING COMPANIES LIMITED 33.07 33.07
NVL NATIONAL VETERINARY CARE LTD 30.00 48.36
MJP MARTIN AIRCRAFT COMPANY LIMITED 27.00 97.72Capital Goods
Category
Health Care Equipment & Services
Investments
Health Care Equipment & Services
Investments
Retailing
Investments
Commercial & Professional Services
Investments
Investments
There was an increase in the number of small
cap companies listing on the ASX in 2015
relative to the previous year. In total, 56% of all
new listings on the ASX were companies with
market capitalisations of less than $100 million,
compared to 43% in 2014.
Within the small cap sector, most listings
were within the $25-50 million bracket where
18 companies listed raising $257.0 million
(or 31%) of the total raised by small cap
companies.This compares to only six in the
previous year.The highest amount of funds
raised was within the $75-100 million range
with 11 companies listing raising a total of
$345.3 million. Again, as in 2014, the smallest
companies (less than $10 million market
cap) contributed the least with only one
listing raising $5.9 million. In 2014, the best
performing range was $50-75 million where
small caps raised $378.0 million.
Predictably, large cap companies dominated
the statistics in terms of total funds raised. In
total, companies with market caps over $100
million raised $6.19 billion out of $7.02 billion
or 88% of the total funds raised for the year.
Notably this is significantly lower than the
total raised by large caps in 2014 of $16.12
billion, which was heavily impacted by several
extremely large raisings such as Medibank
Private which raised $5.67 billion alone.
Average funds raised by small cap companies
in 2015 was down slightly on 2014 at $17.2
million, representing a fall of 11% from the
previous year’s total of $19.3 million. However,
the amount is still higher than in 2013 and 2012
when the averages were $14.0 million and
$5.7 million respectively.
Number of Small Cap IPOs by Market Capitalisation
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100
AmountRaised($m)
NumberofIPOs
Market Capitalisation on Listing
2014 Small Cap IPOs (LHS) 2015 Small Cap IPOs (LHS) Median amount raised 2014 (RHS) Median amount raised 2015 (RHS)
IPOs by market capitalisation
Small cap sector shows signs of improvement
4 www.hlb.com.au
There was an increase in the diversity of
industry sectors represented by new listings
during 2015, with companies successfully
listing coming from 21 different sectors.
This compares favourably to last year’s
new entrants who represented 17 different
industries.
The leading sector in 2015, in terms of number
of listings, was technology (including software
& services and technology hardware &
equipment) comprising 17 out of 85 or 20% of
all new listings.The tech sector in the previous
year contributed 11 out of 70 listings or 16%
of the total.Technology IPOs contributed $1.56
billion out of the total funds raised during the
year of $7.02 billion (2014: $0.45 billion out of
$16.70 billion).
The investments and diversified financials
sector were also large constituents of new
listings with 11 and seven (2014: seven
and four) IPOs respectively, which in total
contributed $1.77 billion or 25% of total funds
raised during the year (2014: $0.56 billion out
of $16.70 billion). In the health care equipment
& services sector, there were eight listings
in 2015 up from seven in 2014. However, the
amount contributed was down substantially
with only $0.25 billion raised compared to
$4.08 billion raised by the sector in 2014.
Resource listings were very limited in 2015
with only four listings and only a single listing
from the energy sector.The sector continues
to struggle with many existing listed vehicles
being subject to reverse takeovers during 2015.
In relation to small cap listings specifically,
there was far less diversity with only 15
industry sectors being represented, which was
still an increase on the 10 sectors represented
in 2014.The trends were similar, however, with
technology stocks representing 12 out of 48
listings, together with significant contributions
from the health care equipment & services
and financial sectors. Only three small cap
resources stocks listed in 2015 highlighting the
ongoing difficulties being experienced in that
sector.
Sector Analysis
Number
Amount
Raised ($m)
Number
Amount
Raised ($m)
Number
Amount
Raised ($m)
Number
Amount
Raised ($m)
Automobiles & Components 1 82 - - - - - -
Banks 1 122 - - - - - -
Capital Goods 1 27 - - 1 27.0 - -
Commercial & Professional Services 3 180 8 1,337 1 55.2 3 36.2
Consumer Durables & Apparel 2 20 - - 1 6.6 - -
Consumer Services 5 369 7 787 4 37.2 4 100.9
Diversified Financials 7 613 4 62 3 17.8 - -
Energy 1 4 5 798 - - 8 76.8
Food, Beverage & Tobacco 3 889 1 125 - - - -
Health Care Equipment & Services 8 252 7 4,084 6 103.4 1 76.6
Household & Personal Products 2 271 1 671 - - - -
Insurance 2 157 2 6,256 - - - -
Investments 11 1,156 7 502 7 315.2
Materials 3 9 5 24 3 9.2 6 14.7
Media - - 2 495 - - 1 3.5
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 5 58 2 323 4 24.5 3 37.2
Real Estate 4 824 1 3 1 11.0 1 3.3
Retailing 5 372 6 591 2 40.7 2 8.5
Software & Services 15 1,537 9 444 10 126.6 - -
Technology Hardware & Equipment 2 24 2 14 2 24.4 - -
Telecommunication Services 3 52 - - 2 26.8 1 3.4
Transportation - - 1 189 - - - -
Utilities 1 2 - - 1 2.1 - -
Total 85 7,020 70 16,705 48 827.6 30 361.1
All Listings Small Cap Only
2015 2014 2015 2014
Industry
- -
The leading sector
in 2015 in terms of
number of listings
was technology
(including software
& services and
technology
hardware &
equipment)
comprising 17 out
of 85 or 20% of all
new listings.
Sector analysis
Increase in technology listings
5Great people, great results
¹ Based on the funds
target being the midpoint
of any allotment range
(some companies do
not have a range). This
means actual fundraising
can exceed “targeted”
fundraising
(i.e. oversubscription).
²Only one company listed
in this market capitalisation
bracket.
Subscription rates were down in 2015 with
only 58 companies (or 68%) out of a total of
85 meeting their subscription targets. While
this is consistent with 2013, when 65% of
companies reached their target, it is down
significantly on the 2014 figure of 79%, which
appears to have been positively impacted by
the greater amount of large cap listings in 2014
relative to 2015.
Although a number of companies experienced
difficulties in reaching full subscriptions, in
total new entrants raised over 91% of the total
funds sought.
In terms of small cap companies, the $75-100
million market cap range also performed well
averaging 105% of the total funds sought.
However, companies with a market
capitalisation of less than $75 million generally
found it difficult to meet their subscription
targets. Subscription rates were significantly
less at lower market capitalisations with only
78% in the $50-75 million bracket and 82%
of the $25-50 million bracket of total funds
sought being successfully raised.The outcome
was worse for companies in the $10-25 million
range where only 42% of the total target
subscriptions were reached.
In terms of the number of companies meeting
their targets, only 50% of companies within
the $10-25 million and $25-50 million brackets
reached their subscription goals.
Some industry sectors were clearly favoured
by investors with the commercial &
professional services, household & personal
products, real estate and retailing sectors all
fully subscribed and software & services also
performing well (93%).
Underwritten offers were again significantly
more successful in 2015.The number of
underwritten offers in 2015 comprised 44%
of total offers, which decreased somewhat
from 66% in 2014. However, underwritten
offers predictably significantly outperformed
new listings overall with only one of the
underwritten offers not meeting its full
subscription target, compared to 68% of all
new IPOs.
Percentage of Subscription Target Achieved¹
119%
42%
82%
78%
105%
92%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
0 to 10² 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100 100+
Market Capitalisation at Listing ($'m)
Percentage of SubscriptionTarget Achieved by Sector¹
Utilities
50%
40%
100%
33%
25%
82%
33%
60%
7%
50%
67%
100%100% 100%
50%
60%
71%
75%
100% 100%
18%
67%
40%
100% 100%
93%
50%
33%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Automobiles &
Components
Banks Capital
Goods
Commercial &
Professional
Services
Consumer Durables
& Apparel
Consumer
Services
Diversified Financials Energy Food, Beverage &
Tobacco
Health Care
Equipment &
Services
Household &
Personal Products
Insurance Investments Materials Pharmaceuticals &
Biotechnology
Real Estate Retailing Software & Services Technology
Hardware &
Equipment
Telecommunication
Services
ShareofCompanies
Target Not Achieved Target Achieved
100% 100%
29%
67%
IPO subscription rates
Subscription rates show mixed success
6 www.hlb.com.au
Newly listed companies in 2015 outperformed
the general market with an average increase
in share price of new entrants of 10%.This
reflects well when compared against the
losses experienced across the major indices
with the ASX 200 falling by 2% over the
year and is consistent with the trend of IPOs
outperforming the indices over the past few
years.
The small cap sector did not perform as
strongly as the overall IPO market with newly
listed small caps experiencing an average
increase of 3% at December.This was
achieved mostly through those companies
within the $25-50 million market cap range
(23% increase) and the $50-75 million sector,
which recorded a 14% increase.
In terms of those industry sectors with three
or more IPOs in 2015, telecommunication
services was the best performing with a
total average increase of 64% over initial
listing price, while diversified financials
(32%), consumer services (19%), retailing
(18%) and food, beverage & tobacco (16%)
also performed well. Average share price
increases over other sectors were relatively
more modest with IPOs within the software &
services industry, for example, recording gains
of 4% over the year.
However, several industry sectors
experienced negative price performance with
pharmaceuticals & biotechnology recording a
loss of 57% over initial prices in a similar trend
to 2014 when the negative price action was
27% over listing price. Resource stocks fared
poorly over the year with the single IPO in the
energy sector recording a year end loss of
77% over initial listing price.
A total of 49 companies, or 58% of all new
listings, recorded first day gains.This is a
consistent trend with previous years where
68% of new listings in 2014 and 67% in 2013
finished their first day of trading in the black.
The average first day gain across all IPOs was
8%. However, nine companies recorded gains
of at least 50% on the conclusion of the first
day’s trading and two companies doubled
in value, namely Phytotech Medical Limited
(110%) and Superloop Limited (103%). Day
one losses were less common with a total of
three companies recording first day losses of
over 50%.
There were numerous companies who
recorded significant returns at the end of the
year with eight companies recording gains of
over 100%.The best performing stock (Appen
Limited) finished the year at $2.30 against its
initial listing price of $0.50.
2015 IPO Share Price Performance by Market CapitalisaƟon
-40%
-20%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100 100+
Averagereturn
Market capitalisation on listing ($m)
Day one closing price 31 December 2015 closing price
¹ Reflects the overall
gain from a notional
investment of $1 in
each IPO, based on
the share price at 31
December 2015.
²Data not presented for
industry sectors with
less than three IPOs.
64%
4%
18%
-1%
-57%
-1%
-3%
6%
16%
32%
19%
6%
-80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80%
Telecommunication Services
Software & Services
Retailing
Real Estate
Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology
Materials
Investments
Health Care Equipment & Services
Food, Beverage & Tobacco
Diversified Financials
Consumer Services
Commercial & Professional Services
Average Return
2015 IPO Share Price Performance by Industry
1, 2
Share price performance
Positive results from new IPOs
7Great people, great results
Case Study
National Veterinary Care Ltd
IPO the best option for capital raising
Access to capital and gaining critical mass quickly were two of the
overriding reasons behind National Veterinary Care’s decision to
pursue an IPO.
National Veterinary Care (NVL) listed on the ASX in August 2015,
after carefully considering the options available to raise capital and
grow the business.
The IPO raised $30 million – 100% of its target – representing
approximately 59% of the shares in the company. With its share
price now sitting comfortably above the offer price, the business’s
plans for growth are firmly on track.
After listing, NVL became the second largest provider of
professional veterinary services in Australia, and is now well
positioned to take advantage of further growth in the industry.
Tomas Steenackers, managing director and chief executive officer,
says an IPO was the most logical way of achieving the company’s
business strategies.
“Other avenues may have achieved the same result, but less
efficiently and over a longer period of time,” he says.
That is not to say the decision to IPO was an automatic one.The
downsides were all carefully considered before a final decision was
made.
“The team all had experience in the public space.They were
all aware of the downsides of an IPO – in terms of the costs
and the integration issues as well as the regulatory hurdles that
were involved – but the decision was made that the positives far
outweighed any negative aspects of such a move.
“The IPO meant we were able to bring together 32 general
practice veterinary clinics and three associated veterinary services
businesses, and create a diversified practice portfolio which
provides a solid foundation for future growth.”
Mr Steenackers says there were some key factors that contributed
to the success of the IPO, and that their importance in ensuring the
process ran smoothly cannot be overstated.These include:
„„ An experienced, collegiate management team
„„ Excellent advisers
„„ A high level of industry acceptance and industry knowledge
„„ The ability of people to do things quickly and accurately
„„ Having a passion for what you are doing.
He freely admits the process was harder than any of them
envisaged, particularly given the focus that was placed on “roll up”
listings by regulators. But he says at no time did the team doubt
they were taking the right course of action.
As a leading provider of veterinary services in the Australian market,
NVL has its eye firmly on business growth. Already NVL has
acquired 35 clinics across Australia, and plans to increase business
growth by acquisition as well as organic growth of its existing
operations. NVL is also planning to start operating a training centre
in March 2016, which will help achieve the organic growth objective
and increase the standards of care.
“Quite simply, the IPO and capital raising will help make these plans
a reality,” Mr Steenackers says.
“The fragmented nature of the Australian veterinary services
industry offers significant growth opportunities through targeted
consolidations and the introduction of back office efficiencies that
lead to great patient care.
“The company’s strategic objective for the next three to five years is
to continue with growth by acquisition. Opportunities in the industry
are being driven by a number of factors, such as the deregulation
of practice ownership enabling non-veterinarians to invest in the
industry along with the desire for veterinarians to focus on their
vocation rather than on the onerous paperwork required when
operating a small business.
“The NVL business model makes this possible.
“Additionally, we plan to build a training facility to assist in the
professional development of practitioners.
“It is also our intention to build practices that can achieve organic
growth. Our ultimate aim is to become the leading vet services
provider in Australia.”
His advice for those considering an IPO? “Be well prepared and be
well supported by your management team and your professional
advisers.
“Above all, ensure the management team has the experience that is
needed for the IPO process, and beyond.
“Between them, the Board and Management team of NVL have
a wealth of relevant experience.They are experienced across
the veterinary sector and they are experienced in mergers and
acquisitions. Strategic HR is another area of strength, as is
corporate governance – both critical aspects of running a successful
operation.
“Above all, it’s important to ensure you really understand the steps
involved in the IPO process – from start to finish – and to realise
that the value of the counsel and insights from your professional
advisers cannot be measured.”
Raised $30 million on listing.
Investigating Accountant
August 2015
8 www.hlb.com.au
In 2015 the ‘backdoor’ provided the entry for
many companies listing on the ASX for the first
time. A ‘backdoor listing’, or reverse takeover,
usually involves a listed ‘shell’ company
acquiring the shares or assets of an unlisted
company for shares in the listed company.
Shareholder approval is required for the
transaction and the entity will typically change
its focus, control, management and name
at this time. An equity capital raising often
accompanies the listing and offers a new life
for a dormant shell company.
ASX automatic removal of long-term
suspended entities
The surge in the number of backdoor listings
during 2015 can be attributed to a change in
ASX policy regarding long-term suspended
entities. From 1 January 2014, the ASX
adopted a policy to automatically remove from
the official list any entity whose securities have
been suspended from trading for a continuous
period of three years.The removal will usually
take effect from the open of trading on the first
trading day after the expiration of that three
year period.The transitional arrangements
mean the first suspensions took effect from 1
January 2016.
Alternative listing route
As an alternative listing route to IPO, a
backdoor listing can be an attractive option
and remove some barriers to listing for certain
companies with particular circumstances.
The ASX Listing Rules require that a listed
company’s share register has a minimum
number of shareholders. A benefit of a
backdoor listing is the listed shell company
already has shareholders, enabling the
company to achieve the required shareholder
spread that it may not have achieved via an
IPO.Through a backdoor listing, a company
can request the ASX to waive the 20 cent
minimum issue price and allow an issue price
as low as 2 cents. If the shell company has
existing cash and expertise within the board
of directors, this would also offer a significant
advantage over an IPO.
Listing via the backdoor rather than via IPO is
not necessarily cheaper and typically the size
of the listing would influence the cost.The
compliance requirements for both backdoor
listings and IPOs are broadly the same. As a
backdoor listing requires shareholder approval,
it may take longer than an IPO.
Failed exploration companies open
the backdoor for software and
technology
The end of the mining boom has seen many
exploration companies fail in the difficult
market conditions. Such companies have been
seeking other investment opportunities outside
the mining industry to give new life to the
entity. A key trend during 2015 has been for
technology and software companies choosing
to list via a backdoor listing route, and often
via a failed mining company. Examples during
2015 include iSignthis Ltd, AHALife Holdings,
and Rent.com.au Limited.
While the end of the ASX transitional
arrangements at the end of 2015 may mean
the volume of backdoor listings will likely
subside, the backdoor path remains an
appealing option for many.
Reverse acquisitions
‘Backdoor listings’ as an alternative listing route
Simon James
Partner
Corporate Advisory
Sydney
A key trend during
2015 has been
for technology
and software
companies
choosing to list via
a backdoor listing
route, and often
via a failed mining
company.
Great people, great results
The HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association
consists of nine member firms and two
representative firms across Australia and New
Zealand. It represents a group of specialists
providing business advice and services to
a wide range of business organisations and
private clients.
As members of HLB International, HLB Mann
Judd firms are part of a worldwide network
of respected accounting firms with more
than 480 offices in over 100 countries. We
are ranked in the top 12 largest accounting
and business advisory groups worldwide.
Through this international network we obtain
the benefit of HLB’s global experience and
provide our clients with access to professional
expertise throughout the world.
HLB Mann Judd firms offer a comprehensive
range of professional services to listed clients
and companies pursuing an IPO. In addition
to acting as corporate advisers, investigating
accountants, and tax and accounting advisers,
we have extensive experience in assisting
clients in their preparation for an IPO and in
evaluating the benefits and feasibility of an IPO
against alternative strategic options.
Our assistance to companies pursuing an IPO
typically includes:
nn Investigating accountant’s reports on
historical and forecast financial information
nn Independent expert’s reports
nn Analysis and advice on feasibility and
alternatives to an IPO
nn Pre-IPO diagnostic review
nn Corporate and structuring advice
nn Financial and taxation due diligence
nn Valuations
nn Company and shareholder tax advice and
planning
nn Accounting advice.
About HLB Mann Judd
Recent transactions
HLB Mann Judd is proud to have assisted
in the following IPOs:
Raised $3.4 million on listing.
Investigating Accountant
December 2015
Raised $9.8 million on listing.
Investigating Accountant
June 2015
Raised $6 million on listing.
Investigating Accountant
August 2015
Raised $30 million on listing.
Investigating Accountant
August 2015
Australian IPO Activity in 2015
IPOWatch Australia
Member Firms
Adelaide
Tel +61 8 8133 5000
Email mailbox@hlbsa.com.au
Auckland
Tel +64 9 303 2243
Email hlb@hlb.co.nz
Brisbane
Tel +61 7 3001 8800
Email mailbox@hlbqld.com.au
Gold Coast
Tel +61 7 5574 0922
Email info@hlbgc.com.au
Melbourne
Tel +61 3 9606 3888
Email mailbox@hlbvic.com.au
Perth
Tel +61 8 9227 7500
Email mailbox@hlbwa.com.au
Perth (Insolvency WA)
Tel +61 8 9215 7900
Email kwallman@hlbinsol.com.au
Sydney
Tel +61 2 9020 4000
Email mailbox@hlbnsw.com.au
Wollongong
Tel +61 2 4254 6500
Email mailbox@hlbw.com.au
Representative Firms
Hobart | Lorkin Delpero Harris
Tel +61 3 6224 4844
Email mail@ldh.com.au
Lismore |Thomas Noble and Russell
Tel +61 2 6621 8544
Email mailbox@tnr.com.au
The HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association is an independent network of accounting firms,
business and financial advisers with offices throughout Australia and New Zealand. Each member
firm is separately owned and managed and has no liability for the acts and omissions of any
other member firm. Not all services listed in this brochure are provided by all member firms.
HLB Mann Judd firms are part of HLB International, a world-wide network of independent
accounting firms and business advisers. © 2016 HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association
linkedin.com/company/hlb-mann-judd twitter.com/HLBMannJudd
hlb.com.au

More Related Content

What's hot

151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
Deborah Chapman
 
Ernst young private equity update 2013 (3)
Ernst  young private equity update 2013 (3)Ernst  young private equity update 2013 (3)
Ernst young private equity update 2013 (3)
Willy Mutenza
 
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
Alice Tomdio
 
Final LEG project copy
Final LEG project copyFinal LEG project copy
Final LEG project copy
Eric Nielsen
 
Global private equity report 2014/15
Global private equity report 2014/15Global private equity report 2014/15
Global private equity report 2014/15
Grant Thornton
 
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
Labour Market Reform Commission
 
[E1] LP Magazine Q1 2015
[E1]  LP Magazine Q1 2015[E1]  LP Magazine Q1 2015
[E1] LP Magazine Q1 2015
FINTECH GLOBAL
 
Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
 	Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree   	Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
mensa25
 
NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
  	NVCA’s Predictions for 2005   	NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
mensa25
 
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
Barolsky Advisors Pty Ltd
 

What's hot (20)

Staffing Industry Insights - Summer 2018
Staffing Industry Insights - Summer 2018Staffing Industry Insights - Summer 2018
Staffing Industry Insights - Summer 2018
 
151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
151003 JSE Nkonki Top 100 report email version
 
People Power: Business across the globe to employ more staff to accelerate gr...
People Power: Business across the globe to employ more staff to accelerate gr...People Power: Business across the globe to employ more staff to accelerate gr...
People Power: Business across the globe to employ more staff to accelerate gr...
 
Global M&A snapshot (IBR 2015)
Global M&A snapshot (IBR 2015)Global M&A snapshot (IBR 2015)
Global M&A snapshot (IBR 2015)
 
Ernst young private equity update 2013 (3)
Ernst  young private equity update 2013 (3)Ernst  young private equity update 2013 (3)
Ernst young private equity update 2013 (3)
 
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
africa-capital-markets-watch-2015
 
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
Capital Risk & IT, The Perfect Connection?
 
Mattermark Q1 2015 Quarter Midpoint Analysis - U.S. Venture Capital Activity
Mattermark Q1 2015 Quarter Midpoint Analysis - U.S. Venture Capital ActivityMattermark Q1 2015 Quarter Midpoint Analysis - U.S. Venture Capital Activity
Mattermark Q1 2015 Quarter Midpoint Analysis - U.S. Venture Capital Activity
 
Globalizing japan
Globalizing japanGlobalizing japan
Globalizing japan
 
Final LEG project copy
Final LEG project copyFinal LEG project copy
Final LEG project copy
 
Global private equity report 2014/15
Global private equity report 2014/15Global private equity report 2014/15
Global private equity report 2014/15
 
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
TOR Technology, Innovation and Productivity Committee LMRC 21may15
 
Portico Advisers: Is Emerging Markets Private Equity Dying?
Portico Advisers: Is Emerging Markets Private Equity Dying?Portico Advisers: Is Emerging Markets Private Equity Dying?
Portico Advisers: Is Emerging Markets Private Equity Dying?
 
[E1] LP Magazine Q1 2015
[E1]  LP Magazine Q1 2015[E1]  LP Magazine Q1 2015
[E1] LP Magazine Q1 2015
 
Asia Pacific First Quarter Investment Report
Asia Pacific First Quarter Investment ReportAsia Pacific First Quarter Investment Report
Asia Pacific First Quarter Investment Report
 
Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
 	Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree   	Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
Venture Capital Investments Q4 06 - MoneyTree
 
NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
  	NVCA’s Predictions for 2005   	NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
NVCA’s Predictions for 2005
 
BoyarMiller Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets – Wha...
BoyarMiller Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets – Wha...BoyarMiller Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets – Wha...
BoyarMiller Breakfast Forum: The Houston Commercial Real Estate Markets – Wha...
 
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
2016 Australia - State of the Legal Market FINAL.PDF
 
Rod Smith – Proactive Advisor Magazine – Volume 5 Issue 5
Rod Smith – Proactive Advisor Magazine – Volume 5 Issue 5Rod Smith – Proactive Advisor Magazine – Volume 5 Issue 5
Rod Smith – Proactive Advisor Magazine – Volume 5 Issue 5
 

Viewers also liked

Chapter11 borrowingcosts2008
Chapter11  borrowingcosts2008Chapter11  borrowingcosts2008
Chapter11 borrowingcosts2008
Sajid Ali
 
Making sense of the sensex
Making sense of the sensexMaking sense of the sensex
Making sense of the sensex
Firoz Anjum
 
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINALIPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
Marcus Ohm
 
7. stock market indices
7. stock market indices7. stock market indices
7. stock market indices
Akash Bakshi
 
Dividend Decisions
Dividend DecisionsDividend Decisions
Dividend Decisions
Dayasagar S
 
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
New Nature Paradigm Tech Analysis: Green, Sustainable, Collaborative
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Capitalisation éducation inclusive
Capitalisation éducation inclusive    Capitalisation éducation inclusive
Capitalisation éducation inclusive
 
L'accès de la femme à la terre
L'accès de la femme à la terreL'accès de la femme à la terre
L'accès de la femme à la terre
 
Article by ca. sudha g. bhushan on thin capitalisation
Article by ca. sudha g. bhushan on thin capitalisationArticle by ca. sudha g. bhushan on thin capitalisation
Article by ca. sudha g. bhushan on thin capitalisation
 
Chapter11 borrowingcosts2008
Chapter11  borrowingcosts2008Chapter11  borrowingcosts2008
Chapter11 borrowingcosts2008
 
Making sense of the sensex
Making sense of the sensexMaking sense of the sensex
Making sense of the sensex
 
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINALIPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
IPO WATCH REPORT 2017 - FINAL
 
Fostering solar technology in the Mediterranean area - Capitalisation Plan
Fostering solar technology in the Mediterranean area - Capitalisation PlanFostering solar technology in the Mediterranean area - Capitalisation Plan
Fostering solar technology in the Mediterranean area - Capitalisation Plan
 
Chiffres clés RH - Société Générale
Chiffres clés RH - Société GénéraleChiffres clés RH - Société Générale
Chiffres clés RH - Société Générale
 
Corporate brand image and identity
Corporate brand image and identityCorporate brand image and identity
Corporate brand image and identity
 
TLC Colombia - Canadá, Oportunidades para Santander
TLC Colombia - Canadá, Oportunidades para SantanderTLC Colombia - Canadá, Oportunidades para Santander
TLC Colombia - Canadá, Oportunidades para Santander
 
Finance Quiz
Finance QuizFinance Quiz
Finance Quiz
 
7. stock market indices
7. stock market indices7. stock market indices
7. stock market indices
 
Dividend Decisions
Dividend DecisionsDividend Decisions
Dividend Decisions
 
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
La Tecnología del Agua Olvidado que es el Costo Limpias y Baja que Puede ser ...
 
La palabra
La palabraLa palabra
La palabra
 
VLC Jones Day : Conduite et déroulement d'une opération d'acquisition en Aust...
VLC Jones Day : Conduite et déroulement d'une opération d'acquisition en Aust...VLC Jones Day : Conduite et déroulement d'une opération d'acquisition en Aust...
VLC Jones Day : Conduite et déroulement d'une opération d'acquisition en Aust...
 
Thin capitalisation 110409
Thin capitalisation 110409Thin capitalisation 110409
Thin capitalisation 110409
 
Stock guide des principales valeurs marocaines novembre 2016
Stock guide des principales valeurs marocaines   novembre 2016Stock guide des principales valeurs marocaines   novembre 2016
Stock guide des principales valeurs marocaines novembre 2016
 
Llumsdenit.Ros
Llumsdenit.RosLlumsdenit.Ros
Llumsdenit.Ros
 
Internationalisierung im Performance Advertising
Internationalisierung im Performance AdvertisingInternationalisierung im Performance Advertising
Internationalisierung im Performance Advertising
 

Similar to IPO Watch 2016 FINAL (JAN 2016)

CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docxCASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
tidwellveronique
 
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
Dave Wright
 
Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
  	Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release   	Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
mensa25
 
Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
  	Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results   	Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
mensa25
 
Venture Investment - Q1-05
Venture Investment - Q1-05 Venture Investment - Q1-05
Venture Investment - Q1-05
mensa25
 

Similar to IPO Watch 2016 FINAL (JAN 2016) (20)

Insight Report: Global Ecommerce Sector
Insight Report: Global Ecommerce Sector Insight Report: Global Ecommerce Sector
Insight Report: Global Ecommerce Sector
 
Insight Report: Global Finance Sector
Insight Report: Global Finance SectorInsight Report: Global Finance Sector
Insight Report: Global Finance Sector
 
CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docxCASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
CASE ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENTIntroduction The assig.docx
 
IPO Report - Q2 2017 FY
IPO Report - Q2 2017 FYIPO Report - Q2 2017 FY
IPO Report - Q2 2017 FY
 
2015 IPO Study (2016_01_25 03_57_23 UTC)
2015 IPO Study (2016_01_25 03_57_23 UTC)2015 IPO Study (2016_01_25 03_57_23 UTC)
2015 IPO Study (2016_01_25 03_57_23 UTC)
 
VC-backed IPOs on the Rise | Aranca Article & Publications
VC-backed IPOs on the Rise | Aranca Article & PublicationsVC-backed IPOs on the Rise | Aranca Article & Publications
VC-backed IPOs on the Rise | Aranca Article & Publications
 
Insight Report: Global Enterprise Solution Sector
Insight Report: Global Enterprise Solution SectorInsight Report: Global Enterprise Solution Sector
Insight Report: Global Enterprise Solution Sector
 
global Venture funding and start up data : top 10 charts
global Venture funding and start up data : top 10 chartsglobal Venture funding and start up data : top 10 charts
global Venture funding and start up data : top 10 charts
 
Retail Domination of Saudi Stock Market Trading Activity Continues to Provoke...
Retail Domination of Saudi Stock Market Trading Activity Continues to Provoke...Retail Domination of Saudi Stock Market Trading Activity Continues to Provoke...
Retail Domination of Saudi Stock Market Trading Activity Continues to Provoke...
 
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Venture Capital | Mid-Year 2016
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Venture Capital | Mid-Year 2016Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Venture Capital | Mid-Year 2016
Mercer Capital's Value Focus: Venture Capital | Mid-Year 2016
 
Think Fundsindia - June 2016
Think Fundsindia - June 2016Think Fundsindia - June 2016
Think Fundsindia - June 2016
 
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
2016-us-goodwill-impairment-study
 
Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
  	Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release   	Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
Venture Capital Investments Q1 ’06 – MoneyTree Release
 
Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
  	Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results   	Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
Venture Capital Investment Q3 05 - MoneyTree Survey Results
 
2017 State of the Venture Capital Industry
2017 State of the Venture Capital Industry2017 State of the Venture Capital Industry
2017 State of the Venture Capital Industry
 
Venture Investment - Q1-05
Venture Investment - Q1-05 Venture Investment - Q1-05
Venture Investment - Q1-05
 
SVB State of the Markets Report Q1 2017
SVB State of the Markets Report Q1 2017SVB State of the Markets Report Q1 2017
SVB State of the Markets Report Q1 2017
 
AgTech Investing Report 2016
AgTech Investing Report 2016AgTech Investing Report 2016
AgTech Investing Report 2016
 
Dupont analysis and evaluating a company's business model
Dupont analysis and evaluating a company's business modelDupont analysis and evaluating a company's business model
Dupont analysis and evaluating a company's business model
 
Seedrs Portfolio Update November 2016
Seedrs Portfolio Update November 2016Seedrs Portfolio Update November 2016
Seedrs Portfolio Update November 2016
 

IPO Watch 2016 FINAL (JAN 2016)

  • 1. JANUARY 2016 Australian IPO Activity in 2015 IPOWatch Australia Great people, great resultshlb.com.au
  • 2. Overview....................................................................1 IPO activity by quarter..............................................2 The road ahead.........................................................2 IPOs by market capitalisation..................................3 Sector analysis..........................................................4 IPO subscription rates..............................................5 Share price performance.........................................6 Case Study – NationalVeterinary Care Ltd............7 Reverse acquisitions.................................................8 Contents For further information Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation. Perth Marcus Ohm +61 8 9267 3225 mohm@hlbwa.com.au Gold Coast Janelle Manders +61 7 5574 0922 jmanders@hlbgc.com.au Melbourne Jude Lau +61 3 9606 3888 jlau@hlbvic.com.au Adelaide Pierre Van Der Merwe +61 8 8133 5025 pvandermerwe@hlbsa.com.au Brisbane (HLB Chessboard) Peter Bishop +61 7 3001 8870 pbishop@hlbchessboard.com.au Sydney Simon James +61 2 9020 4000 sjames@hlbnsw.com.au Disclaimer – The analysis presented in this report relates to all initial public offerings that have resulted in the listing of an entity’s securities on the Australian Securities Exchange (“ASX”) with the exception of property trusts, compliance and “backdoor” listings and offers of non-equity securities. The term “small cap” is used to refer to companies with a market capitalisation of no more than $100 million. All analysis by reference to market capitalisation on listing is based on the price at which new securities were issued. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of HLB Mann Judd. Whilst every care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of information contained in this report, we accept no liability for any error or omission, nor for any action taken in reliance on any statement or opinion in this report. No statement or opinion in this report is intended to be construed as investment advice. Properly considered professional advice should always be sought if in doubt regarding the merits of any investment. Investment companies have been included in the report for this first time this year and the prior period numbers have been adjusted accordingly. Wollongong Ben Fock +61 2 4254 6500 bfock@hlbw.com.au
  • 3. 1Great people, great results There were a total of 85 new IPOs on the ASX during 2015, which saw an increase over the previous year in the number of new entities gaining listed status.The 2015 total compares favourably to 2014, when 70 new companies listed, and the previous 5-year average of 75 listings. The total $7.02 billion funds raised were down on the recent record of $16.70 billion in 2014, which was heavily influenced by two large floats that raised $7.93 billion between them. However, the funds raised in 2015 compare favourably with the 5-year average of $7.05 billion. While the 2014 year was dominated by a number of extremely large IPOs, the activity in 2015 was more evenly balanced. Funds raised were, however, still strongly influenced by larger cap IPOs with 88% of funds raised by IPOs coming from those entities with a market capitalisation exceeding $100 million.This still represents a significant reduction from 2014’s total of 97% of all funds raised. Only two entities with market capitalisations exceeding $1 billion floated in 2015 compared to seven in 2014.The amount raised by these IPOs was $1.33 billion, or 19% of the total. 2015 saw a small recovery in the number of small cap companies undergoing IPOs, with 48 listings (or 56%) coming from companies with a market capitalisation of under $100 million. This is an improvement on 2014 when only 43% of the 70 listings were from small cap companies. However, the contribution from small caps continues to lag significantly behind the previous 5-year average of 57 companies. It is also in stark contrast to the position several years ago in 2012 when small cap companies comprised 92% of all listings. There was greater diversity in industry sectors across new listings in 2015 with the new market entrants coming from 21 different sectors.The technology, investments and healthcare industries were all solidly represented contributing 44 out of a total of 85 new listings. Predictably, resource companies continued to perform poorly with only four listings in the Energy and Materials sectors. The smallest sector – comprising those companies with a market capitalisation under $10 million – only saw one successful listing in 2015.This continues the experience of 2014 when only two companies listed with market caps below $10 million.This is significantly down on the previous 5-year average of 18 listings. Historically, this segment has been represented by junior exploration entities, which highlights the continuing poor investor sentiment on the back of low commodity prices. It is likely that any significant improvement at this end of the IPO market is strongly linked to a sustained recovery in the resources sector. First day share price performance was generally mixed with a total of 69% of companies recording first day gains. In terms of year end gains, 62% of companies closed out the year above their issue price.This is a slight increase over 2014 when the amount of companies recording first day gains was 55%. Newly listed companies in 2015 outperformed the market in general with an average increase in share price of IPOs of 10%.This appears a solid performance when compared against the losses experienced across the major indices with the ASX 200 falling by 2% over the year and is consistent with the trend of IPOs outperforming the indices over the past few years. However, subscription rates were down in 2015, relative to the previous year, with only 58 companies (or 68% of the total) meeting their subscription targets.This is consistent with 2013, where 65% of companies reached their target, but down significantly on the 2014 figure of 79%. Small cap companies (particularly those with a market capitalisation of less than $75 million) generally found it difficult to meet their subscription targets and subscription rates were significantly less at lower market capitalisations. Companies within the $50-75 million and $25-50 million brackets only raised 78% and 82% (respectively) of their targets, while for the $10-25 million bracket the figure was only 42%. Although a number of companies experienced difficulties in reaching full subscriptions, in total new entrants raised over 91% of the total funds sought. Overview Steady improvement in the IPO market for small caps Marcus Ohm Partner Corporate & Audit Services Perth 4 3 5 3 6 5 4 7 9 9 5 25 - 5 10 15 20 25 30 - 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 4,000.00 5,000.00 6,000.00 7,000.00 8,000.00 January February March April May June July August September October November December NumberofNewIssues CumulativeFundraising($'M) Number of Listings (RHS) Cumulative Small Cap Fundraising (LHS) Cumulative Large Cap Fundraising (LHS) Cumulative Total Fundraising (LHS)
  • 4. 2 www.hlb.com.au The pipeline at the start of 2016 looks healthier than in recent years with a number of market aspirants seeking an ASX listing. Among those who have applied to list are biotechnology companies, Bitcoin “miners”, a large dairy corporation and workforce solution providers. A total of 20 companies had applied to list on the ASX as at 31 December 2015, hoping to raise a total of $208.3 million, which indicates that 2016 may follow on from the strong finish to 2015. This is a stronger pipeline relative to the start of 2015 when only 14 companies had applied to list with a targeted raising of $114.0 million. Resource stocks are still poorly represented with only four entities seeking $15.3 million, reflecting the poor sentiment in this sector. Approximately 23% of the funds sought are from biotechnology and agricultural companies with six entities seeking to raise a total of $48.5 million.Technology companies are the most prevalent leveraging the recent success stories such as Uber and Airbnb. There are currently seven new companies in the process of listing in this sector, seeking $68.5 million. It will be interesting to see the impact of the current market volatility and economic trends on IPO activity throughout 2016 and the extent to which small caps can demonstrate value in the IPO process. The road ahead... While 2015 experienced a slow start to the number of listings, these steadily increased throughout the year with a strong December quarter almost doubling the number of IPOs during the year.This ‘rush-to-market’ phenomenon in the final quarter has been evident over recent years and the impact of this was significant in 2015. At the end of the September quarter, a total of 46 companies had listed, which is broadly consistent with the previous few years. However, with an additional 39 companies listing in the final quarter of the year, this increased the total number of listings to 85 significantly above the 70 listings of 2014. Continuing the trend of prior years, the March quarter was the quietest contributing only 3% of the total year’s funds or $204.7 million. Average funds raised were also substantially less than the other quarters at $17.0 million, which was significantly less against the average for the year of $82.6 million. The final quarter was the busiest, experiencing the highest number of listings with 39, of which 25 occurred in December.This compares favourably with 33 listings occurring in the final three months of 2014. Funds raised during this quarter, however, were significantly down against 2014 due to the major impact of the Medibank Private float and other large listings in the previous year. Several large listings occurred in the June quarter such as MYOB ($833 million) giving rise to an average amount of funds raised in that quarter of $143.0 million. Even though the June quarter only recorded 16% of the total number of listings, almost a full third (29%) of the amount raised for the year came about in this quarter. Within the small cap sector specifically, the pattern was similar with December accounting for 19 listings (40% of 48 total) and 46% of the total funds raised by small caps of $827.6 million.The June quarter was more difficult for small caps with only 9% of small cap funds occurring in this period. In terms of share price performance, those small caps who listed in the March and June quarters recorded average increases of 35% and 39% respectively by the end of the year, compared to small caps listing in the September (gain of 10%) and December quarters (loss of 13%). On average the first day loss of those small caps which listed in December was 27%. IPO activity by quarter A strong December quarter IPO Activity by Quarter $- $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 - 10 20 30 40 50 60 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 AmountRaised($m) NumberofIPOs # of IPOs >$100M # of IPOs <$100M Amount Raised ($M)
  • 5. 3Great people, great results Largest IPOs Within Small Cap Segment in 2015 Company Name Amount Raised ($m) Market Cap ($m) AEG ABSOLUTE EQUITY PERFORMANCE FUND LIMITED 100.00 100.00 CIE CONTANGO INCOME GENERATOR LIMITED 71.50 71.50 XIP XENITH IP GROUP LIMITED 55.15 89.26 AWQ AROWANA AUSTRALASIAN VALUE OPPORTUNITIES FUND LIMITED 48.11 48.11 AHX APIAM ANIMAL HEALTH LIMITED 40.00 98.48 RYD RYDER CAPITAL LIMITED 36.83 36.83 ADR ADHERIUM LIMITED 35.00 70.00 8EC 8IP EMERGING COMPANIES LIMITED 33.07 33.07 NVL NATIONAL VETERINARY CARE LTD 30.00 48.36 MJP MARTIN AIRCRAFT COMPANY LIMITED 27.00 97.72Capital Goods Category Health Care Equipment & Services Investments Health Care Equipment & Services Investments Retailing Investments Commercial & Professional Services Investments Investments There was an increase in the number of small cap companies listing on the ASX in 2015 relative to the previous year. In total, 56% of all new listings on the ASX were companies with market capitalisations of less than $100 million, compared to 43% in 2014. Within the small cap sector, most listings were within the $25-50 million bracket where 18 companies listed raising $257.0 million (or 31%) of the total raised by small cap companies.This compares to only six in the previous year.The highest amount of funds raised was within the $75-100 million range with 11 companies listing raising a total of $345.3 million. Again, as in 2014, the smallest companies (less than $10 million market cap) contributed the least with only one listing raising $5.9 million. In 2014, the best performing range was $50-75 million where small caps raised $378.0 million. Predictably, large cap companies dominated the statistics in terms of total funds raised. In total, companies with market caps over $100 million raised $6.19 billion out of $7.02 billion or 88% of the total funds raised for the year. Notably this is significantly lower than the total raised by large caps in 2014 of $16.12 billion, which was heavily impacted by several extremely large raisings such as Medibank Private which raised $5.67 billion alone. Average funds raised by small cap companies in 2015 was down slightly on 2014 at $17.2 million, representing a fall of 11% from the previous year’s total of $19.3 million. However, the amount is still higher than in 2013 and 2012 when the averages were $14.0 million and $5.7 million respectively. Number of Small Cap IPOs by Market Capitalisation - 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 0 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100 AmountRaised($m) NumberofIPOs Market Capitalisation on Listing 2014 Small Cap IPOs (LHS) 2015 Small Cap IPOs (LHS) Median amount raised 2014 (RHS) Median amount raised 2015 (RHS) IPOs by market capitalisation Small cap sector shows signs of improvement
  • 6. 4 www.hlb.com.au There was an increase in the diversity of industry sectors represented by new listings during 2015, with companies successfully listing coming from 21 different sectors. This compares favourably to last year’s new entrants who represented 17 different industries. The leading sector in 2015, in terms of number of listings, was technology (including software & services and technology hardware & equipment) comprising 17 out of 85 or 20% of all new listings.The tech sector in the previous year contributed 11 out of 70 listings or 16% of the total.Technology IPOs contributed $1.56 billion out of the total funds raised during the year of $7.02 billion (2014: $0.45 billion out of $16.70 billion). The investments and diversified financials sector were also large constituents of new listings with 11 and seven (2014: seven and four) IPOs respectively, which in total contributed $1.77 billion or 25% of total funds raised during the year (2014: $0.56 billion out of $16.70 billion). In the health care equipment & services sector, there were eight listings in 2015 up from seven in 2014. However, the amount contributed was down substantially with only $0.25 billion raised compared to $4.08 billion raised by the sector in 2014. Resource listings were very limited in 2015 with only four listings and only a single listing from the energy sector.The sector continues to struggle with many existing listed vehicles being subject to reverse takeovers during 2015. In relation to small cap listings specifically, there was far less diversity with only 15 industry sectors being represented, which was still an increase on the 10 sectors represented in 2014.The trends were similar, however, with technology stocks representing 12 out of 48 listings, together with significant contributions from the health care equipment & services and financial sectors. Only three small cap resources stocks listed in 2015 highlighting the ongoing difficulties being experienced in that sector. Sector Analysis Number Amount Raised ($m) Number Amount Raised ($m) Number Amount Raised ($m) Number Amount Raised ($m) Automobiles & Components 1 82 - - - - - - Banks 1 122 - - - - - - Capital Goods 1 27 - - 1 27.0 - - Commercial & Professional Services 3 180 8 1,337 1 55.2 3 36.2 Consumer Durables & Apparel 2 20 - - 1 6.6 - - Consumer Services 5 369 7 787 4 37.2 4 100.9 Diversified Financials 7 613 4 62 3 17.8 - - Energy 1 4 5 798 - - 8 76.8 Food, Beverage & Tobacco 3 889 1 125 - - - - Health Care Equipment & Services 8 252 7 4,084 6 103.4 1 76.6 Household & Personal Products 2 271 1 671 - - - - Insurance 2 157 2 6,256 - - - - Investments 11 1,156 7 502 7 315.2 Materials 3 9 5 24 3 9.2 6 14.7 Media - - 2 495 - - 1 3.5 Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 5 58 2 323 4 24.5 3 37.2 Real Estate 4 824 1 3 1 11.0 1 3.3 Retailing 5 372 6 591 2 40.7 2 8.5 Software & Services 15 1,537 9 444 10 126.6 - - Technology Hardware & Equipment 2 24 2 14 2 24.4 - - Telecommunication Services 3 52 - - 2 26.8 1 3.4 Transportation - - 1 189 - - - - Utilities 1 2 - - 1 2.1 - - Total 85 7,020 70 16,705 48 827.6 30 361.1 All Listings Small Cap Only 2015 2014 2015 2014 Industry - - The leading sector in 2015 in terms of number of listings was technology (including software & services and technology hardware & equipment) comprising 17 out of 85 or 20% of all new listings. Sector analysis Increase in technology listings
  • 7. 5Great people, great results ¹ Based on the funds target being the midpoint of any allotment range (some companies do not have a range). This means actual fundraising can exceed “targeted” fundraising (i.e. oversubscription). ²Only one company listed in this market capitalisation bracket. Subscription rates were down in 2015 with only 58 companies (or 68%) out of a total of 85 meeting their subscription targets. While this is consistent with 2013, when 65% of companies reached their target, it is down significantly on the 2014 figure of 79%, which appears to have been positively impacted by the greater amount of large cap listings in 2014 relative to 2015. Although a number of companies experienced difficulties in reaching full subscriptions, in total new entrants raised over 91% of the total funds sought. In terms of small cap companies, the $75-100 million market cap range also performed well averaging 105% of the total funds sought. However, companies with a market capitalisation of less than $75 million generally found it difficult to meet their subscription targets. Subscription rates were significantly less at lower market capitalisations with only 78% in the $50-75 million bracket and 82% of the $25-50 million bracket of total funds sought being successfully raised.The outcome was worse for companies in the $10-25 million range where only 42% of the total target subscriptions were reached. In terms of the number of companies meeting their targets, only 50% of companies within the $10-25 million and $25-50 million brackets reached their subscription goals. Some industry sectors were clearly favoured by investors with the commercial & professional services, household & personal products, real estate and retailing sectors all fully subscribed and software & services also performing well (93%). Underwritten offers were again significantly more successful in 2015.The number of underwritten offers in 2015 comprised 44% of total offers, which decreased somewhat from 66% in 2014. However, underwritten offers predictably significantly outperformed new listings overall with only one of the underwritten offers not meeting its full subscription target, compared to 68% of all new IPOs. Percentage of Subscription Target Achieved¹ 119% 42% 82% 78% 105% 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 0 to 10² 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100 100+ Market Capitalisation at Listing ($'m) Percentage of SubscriptionTarget Achieved by Sector¹ Utilities 50% 40% 100% 33% 25% 82% 33% 60% 7% 50% 67% 100%100% 100% 50% 60% 71% 75% 100% 100% 18% 67% 40% 100% 100% 93% 50% 33% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Automobiles & Components Banks Capital Goods Commercial & Professional Services Consumer Durables & Apparel Consumer Services Diversified Financials Energy Food, Beverage & Tobacco Health Care Equipment & Services Household & Personal Products Insurance Investments Materials Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Real Estate Retailing Software & Services Technology Hardware & Equipment Telecommunication Services ShareofCompanies Target Not Achieved Target Achieved 100% 100% 29% 67% IPO subscription rates Subscription rates show mixed success
  • 8. 6 www.hlb.com.au Newly listed companies in 2015 outperformed the general market with an average increase in share price of new entrants of 10%.This reflects well when compared against the losses experienced across the major indices with the ASX 200 falling by 2% over the year and is consistent with the trend of IPOs outperforming the indices over the past few years. The small cap sector did not perform as strongly as the overall IPO market with newly listed small caps experiencing an average increase of 3% at December.This was achieved mostly through those companies within the $25-50 million market cap range (23% increase) and the $50-75 million sector, which recorded a 14% increase. In terms of those industry sectors with three or more IPOs in 2015, telecommunication services was the best performing with a total average increase of 64% over initial listing price, while diversified financials (32%), consumer services (19%), retailing (18%) and food, beverage & tobacco (16%) also performed well. Average share price increases over other sectors were relatively more modest with IPOs within the software & services industry, for example, recording gains of 4% over the year. However, several industry sectors experienced negative price performance with pharmaceuticals & biotechnology recording a loss of 57% over initial prices in a similar trend to 2014 when the negative price action was 27% over listing price. Resource stocks fared poorly over the year with the single IPO in the energy sector recording a year end loss of 77% over initial listing price. A total of 49 companies, or 58% of all new listings, recorded first day gains.This is a consistent trend with previous years where 68% of new listings in 2014 and 67% in 2013 finished their first day of trading in the black. The average first day gain across all IPOs was 8%. However, nine companies recorded gains of at least 50% on the conclusion of the first day’s trading and two companies doubled in value, namely Phytotech Medical Limited (110%) and Superloop Limited (103%). Day one losses were less common with a total of three companies recording first day losses of over 50%. There were numerous companies who recorded significant returns at the end of the year with eight companies recording gains of over 100%.The best performing stock (Appen Limited) finished the year at $2.30 against its initial listing price of $0.50. 2015 IPO Share Price Performance by Market CapitalisaƟon -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 0 to 10 10 to 25 25 to 50 50 to 75 75 to 100 100+ Averagereturn Market capitalisation on listing ($m) Day one closing price 31 December 2015 closing price ¹ Reflects the overall gain from a notional investment of $1 in each IPO, based on the share price at 31 December 2015. ²Data not presented for industry sectors with less than three IPOs. 64% 4% 18% -1% -57% -1% -3% 6% 16% 32% 19% 6% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Telecommunication Services Software & Services Retailing Real Estate Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology Materials Investments Health Care Equipment & Services Food, Beverage & Tobacco Diversified Financials Consumer Services Commercial & Professional Services Average Return 2015 IPO Share Price Performance by Industry 1, 2 Share price performance Positive results from new IPOs
  • 9. 7Great people, great results Case Study National Veterinary Care Ltd IPO the best option for capital raising Access to capital and gaining critical mass quickly were two of the overriding reasons behind National Veterinary Care’s decision to pursue an IPO. National Veterinary Care (NVL) listed on the ASX in August 2015, after carefully considering the options available to raise capital and grow the business. The IPO raised $30 million – 100% of its target – representing approximately 59% of the shares in the company. With its share price now sitting comfortably above the offer price, the business’s plans for growth are firmly on track. After listing, NVL became the second largest provider of professional veterinary services in Australia, and is now well positioned to take advantage of further growth in the industry. Tomas Steenackers, managing director and chief executive officer, says an IPO was the most logical way of achieving the company’s business strategies. “Other avenues may have achieved the same result, but less efficiently and over a longer period of time,” he says. That is not to say the decision to IPO was an automatic one.The downsides were all carefully considered before a final decision was made. “The team all had experience in the public space.They were all aware of the downsides of an IPO – in terms of the costs and the integration issues as well as the regulatory hurdles that were involved – but the decision was made that the positives far outweighed any negative aspects of such a move. “The IPO meant we were able to bring together 32 general practice veterinary clinics and three associated veterinary services businesses, and create a diversified practice portfolio which provides a solid foundation for future growth.” Mr Steenackers says there were some key factors that contributed to the success of the IPO, and that their importance in ensuring the process ran smoothly cannot be overstated.These include: „„ An experienced, collegiate management team „„ Excellent advisers „„ A high level of industry acceptance and industry knowledge „„ The ability of people to do things quickly and accurately „„ Having a passion for what you are doing. He freely admits the process was harder than any of them envisaged, particularly given the focus that was placed on “roll up” listings by regulators. But he says at no time did the team doubt they were taking the right course of action. As a leading provider of veterinary services in the Australian market, NVL has its eye firmly on business growth. Already NVL has acquired 35 clinics across Australia, and plans to increase business growth by acquisition as well as organic growth of its existing operations. NVL is also planning to start operating a training centre in March 2016, which will help achieve the organic growth objective and increase the standards of care. “Quite simply, the IPO and capital raising will help make these plans a reality,” Mr Steenackers says. “The fragmented nature of the Australian veterinary services industry offers significant growth opportunities through targeted consolidations and the introduction of back office efficiencies that lead to great patient care. “The company’s strategic objective for the next three to five years is to continue with growth by acquisition. Opportunities in the industry are being driven by a number of factors, such as the deregulation of practice ownership enabling non-veterinarians to invest in the industry along with the desire for veterinarians to focus on their vocation rather than on the onerous paperwork required when operating a small business. “The NVL business model makes this possible. “Additionally, we plan to build a training facility to assist in the professional development of practitioners. “It is also our intention to build practices that can achieve organic growth. Our ultimate aim is to become the leading vet services provider in Australia.” His advice for those considering an IPO? “Be well prepared and be well supported by your management team and your professional advisers. “Above all, ensure the management team has the experience that is needed for the IPO process, and beyond. “Between them, the Board and Management team of NVL have a wealth of relevant experience.They are experienced across the veterinary sector and they are experienced in mergers and acquisitions. Strategic HR is another area of strength, as is corporate governance – both critical aspects of running a successful operation. “Above all, it’s important to ensure you really understand the steps involved in the IPO process – from start to finish – and to realise that the value of the counsel and insights from your professional advisers cannot be measured.” Raised $30 million on listing. Investigating Accountant August 2015
  • 10. 8 www.hlb.com.au In 2015 the ‘backdoor’ provided the entry for many companies listing on the ASX for the first time. A ‘backdoor listing’, or reverse takeover, usually involves a listed ‘shell’ company acquiring the shares or assets of an unlisted company for shares in the listed company. Shareholder approval is required for the transaction and the entity will typically change its focus, control, management and name at this time. An equity capital raising often accompanies the listing and offers a new life for a dormant shell company. ASX automatic removal of long-term suspended entities The surge in the number of backdoor listings during 2015 can be attributed to a change in ASX policy regarding long-term suspended entities. From 1 January 2014, the ASX adopted a policy to automatically remove from the official list any entity whose securities have been suspended from trading for a continuous period of three years.The removal will usually take effect from the open of trading on the first trading day after the expiration of that three year period.The transitional arrangements mean the first suspensions took effect from 1 January 2016. Alternative listing route As an alternative listing route to IPO, a backdoor listing can be an attractive option and remove some barriers to listing for certain companies with particular circumstances. The ASX Listing Rules require that a listed company’s share register has a minimum number of shareholders. A benefit of a backdoor listing is the listed shell company already has shareholders, enabling the company to achieve the required shareholder spread that it may not have achieved via an IPO.Through a backdoor listing, a company can request the ASX to waive the 20 cent minimum issue price and allow an issue price as low as 2 cents. If the shell company has existing cash and expertise within the board of directors, this would also offer a significant advantage over an IPO. Listing via the backdoor rather than via IPO is not necessarily cheaper and typically the size of the listing would influence the cost.The compliance requirements for both backdoor listings and IPOs are broadly the same. As a backdoor listing requires shareholder approval, it may take longer than an IPO. Failed exploration companies open the backdoor for software and technology The end of the mining boom has seen many exploration companies fail in the difficult market conditions. Such companies have been seeking other investment opportunities outside the mining industry to give new life to the entity. A key trend during 2015 has been for technology and software companies choosing to list via a backdoor listing route, and often via a failed mining company. Examples during 2015 include iSignthis Ltd, AHALife Holdings, and Rent.com.au Limited. While the end of the ASX transitional arrangements at the end of 2015 may mean the volume of backdoor listings will likely subside, the backdoor path remains an appealing option for many. Reverse acquisitions ‘Backdoor listings’ as an alternative listing route Simon James Partner Corporate Advisory Sydney A key trend during 2015 has been for technology and software companies choosing to list via a backdoor listing route, and often via a failed mining company.
  • 11. Great people, great results The HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association consists of nine member firms and two representative firms across Australia and New Zealand. It represents a group of specialists providing business advice and services to a wide range of business organisations and private clients. As members of HLB International, HLB Mann Judd firms are part of a worldwide network of respected accounting firms with more than 480 offices in over 100 countries. We are ranked in the top 12 largest accounting and business advisory groups worldwide. Through this international network we obtain the benefit of HLB’s global experience and provide our clients with access to professional expertise throughout the world. HLB Mann Judd firms offer a comprehensive range of professional services to listed clients and companies pursuing an IPO. In addition to acting as corporate advisers, investigating accountants, and tax and accounting advisers, we have extensive experience in assisting clients in their preparation for an IPO and in evaluating the benefits and feasibility of an IPO against alternative strategic options. Our assistance to companies pursuing an IPO typically includes: nn Investigating accountant’s reports on historical and forecast financial information nn Independent expert’s reports nn Analysis and advice on feasibility and alternatives to an IPO nn Pre-IPO diagnostic review nn Corporate and structuring advice nn Financial and taxation due diligence nn Valuations nn Company and shareholder tax advice and planning nn Accounting advice. About HLB Mann Judd Recent transactions HLB Mann Judd is proud to have assisted in the following IPOs: Raised $3.4 million on listing. Investigating Accountant December 2015 Raised $9.8 million on listing. Investigating Accountant June 2015 Raised $6 million on listing. Investigating Accountant August 2015 Raised $30 million on listing. Investigating Accountant August 2015
  • 12. Australian IPO Activity in 2015 IPOWatch Australia Member Firms Adelaide Tel +61 8 8133 5000 Email mailbox@hlbsa.com.au Auckland Tel +64 9 303 2243 Email hlb@hlb.co.nz Brisbane Tel +61 7 3001 8800 Email mailbox@hlbqld.com.au Gold Coast Tel +61 7 5574 0922 Email info@hlbgc.com.au Melbourne Tel +61 3 9606 3888 Email mailbox@hlbvic.com.au Perth Tel +61 8 9227 7500 Email mailbox@hlbwa.com.au Perth (Insolvency WA) Tel +61 8 9215 7900 Email kwallman@hlbinsol.com.au Sydney Tel +61 2 9020 4000 Email mailbox@hlbnsw.com.au Wollongong Tel +61 2 4254 6500 Email mailbox@hlbw.com.au Representative Firms Hobart | Lorkin Delpero Harris Tel +61 3 6224 4844 Email mail@ldh.com.au Lismore |Thomas Noble and Russell Tel +61 2 6621 8544 Email mailbox@tnr.com.au The HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association is an independent network of accounting firms, business and financial advisers with offices throughout Australia and New Zealand. Each member firm is separately owned and managed and has no liability for the acts and omissions of any other member firm. Not all services listed in this brochure are provided by all member firms. HLB Mann Judd firms are part of HLB International, a world-wide network of independent accounting firms and business advisers. © 2016 HLB Mann Judd Australasian Association linkedin.com/company/hlb-mann-judd twitter.com/HLBMannJudd hlb.com.au