1. Abstract: Urban design plays a critical role in determining the health of
people. The ways our cities are laid out determine our daily activities
which in turn influence health and well being. Built environment
features such as parks and streets can be modified in such as manner that
they are more welcoming, livable, safe and visually appealing. As part of
the Built Environment and Health portfolio major element, I will
propose redesigning the Hurt Park and the surrounding streets-
Edgewood Avenue, Gilmer Street and Courtland Street by highlighting
the potentials of the area and to make them more functional for
pedestrians and park users.
Madhubanti Ganguly
PH 7340 Built Environment and Health
Spring 2012
Georgia State University
Redesigning Hurt Park and Surrounding
Streets to Promote Healthy Environment

2. Introduction:
Human beings find tranquility, comfort and restoration from contact with nature. Green space such as
parks and gardens can be therapeutic too. Urban parks are often places where people seek refuge from
their daily chaotic city life. Nature contact may also benefit health through stress reduction. But often due
to lack of maintenance and improper design, these parks lose their attraction. They become deserted,
isolated from their surroundings, become hotspots for crime and illegal activities rendering them more
unattractive to park users. Moreover, if parks lack in facilities such as sufficient lighting, public
restrooms, drinking water fountains, walking trails or seating areas, people are not encouraged to spend
their time over there. Parks not only serve as place for contact with nature, they can also provide facilities
such as walking trails, to engage in physical activity.
Another important built environment feature that influences our health is streets. Although average
Americans spend more time sitting in their cars, we use streets to walk to our final destinations such as
schools, workplace or homes. We often do not realize it, but street designs and features influence the
amount of time we spend walking on them. Making streets pedestrian friendly and safe and introducing
aesthetics will encourage people to walk longer distances than they would have done otherwise. Several
cities across United States have realized the importance of streets to the communities and are re-
evaluating both the form and function of their "street spaces"1
so that they can create livable communities.
Cities like Seattle (2005), Los Angeles (2008), New York (2009), San Francisco (Draft, 2008), have
released new street design manuals and toolkits with the aim of making streets places to linger and places
to cherish, improving the public right-of-way for all users, supporting design improvements such as
crosswalks, bike lanes, and roundabouts that improve pedestrians and bike riders safety, designing streets
based on their place within a hierarchy of streets and their relationship to surrounding land uses, densities,
and commercial activities, maintaining several functions in the street that include safety, roadway
infrastructure, environmental sensitivity, creating places that encourage walking and exercise, improving
the overall aesthetic with an emphasis on high quality, sustainable design and materials and creating a
healthy environment by minimizing negative environmental effects (Hawkes, 2009).
Hurt Park located in Downtown Atlanta is an urban park currently underutilized. The street segments
along with the park have lots of potential to serve as location for outdoor activities. The theme of this
portfolio element is to highlight the potentials of the park and the surrounding streets as built environment
features promoting health. This is represented as a photo essay where present pictures of the Hurt Park
and the three street segments of Edgewood Avenue, Gilmer Street and Courtland Street around this
triangular park have been compared with a new proposed design using the Google SkechUp tool. The
1
http://www.planetizen.com/node/40394

3. pictures of the existing park and streets were taken on March 7th
, 2012 between noon and 1 PM. Based on
the existing conditions of the park and the streets, models were created to illustrate a vision of the
proposed plan. The designs are based on previous research on similar fields. This photo essay has not
looked into the budget and financing of the proposal but the plans have taken into account feasibility and
affordability.
Literature Review:
Built Environment and Health: There is abundant research available which discusses relationship
between built environment and health. The place where one lives determines how healthy that person will
be. Urban planning and public health emerged with common a goal that is to prevent and protect people
from infectious disease. The way planners design a place has an impact on the health and well being of
the people living there. The two disciplines have ever since gone separate ways. Reconnecting the two
fields have certain challenges such as how to pay attention to the effects of built environment while also
expanding the political processes that produce such outcomes. There are also challenges such as
developing a multidisciplinary approach towards eliminating health disparities and developing an urban
health agenda. Social epidemiology and environmental justice can reconnect the two disciplines (Corburn,
2004). Health disparity is often evident from the availability of food in one’s neighborhood. Resident in
disadvantaged neighborhoods have poor access to healthy food which can be explained through
associations between the neighborhood food resource environment and residents' health status and body
mass index (BMI) for adults with and without chronic conditions (Brown, A. 2008). Brown’s study has
come up with results that show an association between local food environment and health status and BMI
of the people. The association varied on the basis of chain supermarkets or convenience stores, the former
reporting better health than the latter. The impact of built environment is also evident in the amount of
physical activity that people engage in. There is an increasing trend in reduced physical activity among
Americans and the lack of suitable physical environment is often a contributing factor. In Curitiba, Brazil,
a study looked at the relationship between built environment and recreational physical activity. They
concluded that adults who live in areas with higher income level, higher number of gyms and nearby
recreation sports and leisure centers were more likely to meet the daily exercise recommendations
compared to adults living in areas without those characteristics (Adriano, A.F.H. 2011). The negative
health impacts of poor city planning are most pronounced in the sprawl type of development prevalent
across the United States. Urban sprawl focuses on the adverse health and environmental effects of urban
growth into areas beyond the inner cities. Sprawl type of development increases air pollution due to
increased driving; it reduces physical activity opportunities, increases temperature by creating heat

4. islands, increases motor vehicle crashes, pedestrian injuries and fatalities, affects water quality and
quantity, impacts mental health, and reduces social capital. The burden of poor health is most on the
vulnerable population and health effects of sprawl are unevenly distributed (Frumkin, H. 2002). Housing
is yet another built environment feature that has an important influence on the well being of the people.
For instance, quality of housing plays an important role in causing childhood asthma in urban
communities. Asthma among children is more pronounced in low socio economic communities with poor
housing characteristics. Studies have shown that children living in public housing, which are assigned for
poor people, have higher odds of asthma than children living in all types of private housing, even after
adjusting for individual risk factors for asthma such as minority ethnicity, race, living in a low-income
household, and living in a low-income community (Northridge, J. 2010). In the United States, several
pedestrian fatalities and injuries are caused due to urban designs which prioritize driving rather than
walking. This has lead researchers to look at the relationship between built environment and injury
prevalence. It has been observed that most of the pedestrian injuries can be avoided by modifying the
environment. One particular study examined how perceived and actual crash risk are related with each
other and with respect to built environmental characteristics. The result was that, residents living in low
density neighborhoods were more likely to perceive their neighborhood as dangerous relative to residents
of compact, mixed-use neighborhoods even though the latter displayed higher actual crash rates. Hence,
from a policy standpoint, more attention and proactive interventions from planners are necessary in
suburban areas since these areas have high-perceived risks (Gihyoug, C. 2009). Design solutions which
aim at improving transportation and safety can also encourage active living. It is important to identify
planning strategies prioritizing health and active living. There is evidence supporting the fact that creating
choices for transportation and recreation can effectively address traffic congestion, air quality and other
health affecting issues. Active living environments can provide greater opportunities for regular physical
activity without planning for it. In an environment supporting active living, provisions for physical
activity will be readily and safely available in the surrounding environment. An active living environment
provide opportunities to be physically active when one walks out of the front door of the home, office or
school (Killingsworth, R. R., 2003). Most of the built environment issues such as those related to housing
and transportation, have policy goals which are implemented through legislation. Policies can either
contribute to or negatively affect human health. Some policy impediments could include unaffordable
housing and health investment that light lead to unwanted costs, unclear statutory authority and resulting
gaps in responsibility for housing, indoor air, and the built environment. On the other hand, local
programs can effectively build healthy homes capacity through local laws and housing codes (Jacob, D.
2007). The study suggests that policymakers in the US should adopt a prevention-oriented,
comprehensive multidisciplinary approach at all levels of government with the aim to prevent unhealthy

5. buildings, houses, and communities. An important tool to determine the impact of built environment
features on public health is to conduct a health impact assessment of a future project or program. The
concept of a health impact assessment (HIA) is fairly new and is catching up but this is a powerful
methodology to determine the health consequences of particular decisions. Projects and policies affecting
human health take place regularly in the US. HIAs can provide the best available data to decision makers
to inform them about the health impacts of their decisions.HIA is capable of identifying the impacts of
proposed policy and infrastructure changes, utilizing quantitative and non quantitative analyses which
allows health outcomes to be appropriately factored into complex decisions (Dannenberg, A. 2008). The
future of built environment and human health will become all the more challenging with emerging issues
such as climate change and global warming. Climate related health issues are location specific; therefore,
places with hazardous exposure will bear a greater burden than others. Climate change will disturb
ecologic, cultural, and economic relationships and also the conceptions of place (Jeremy, J.H., 2008).
Factors like sea-level rise, movement of ecologic transition zones, and economic damage of regions and
communities, might complicate human relationships with place. The study also explains why it would be
hard to maintain human relationship with place if there is loss of ecology that established the relationship.
Health benefits from contact with nature through parks and trails and livable streets:
Percentage of green space in an area generally has a positive relationship with good health. But this
association might depend on the degree of urbanity and level of deprivation in the area. The quantity
alone cannot determine whether there will be a positive influence, the quality of the green space plays a
crucial role in determining how much of that space can be used by the people. In low income
neighborhoods it is often noticed that parks and play areas are municipal owned and are not well
maintained. In a situation like that, larger number of poor quality green space might have a worse effect
on the population (Mitchell, 2007). Parks and outdoor recreation facilities play an important role in
addressing chronic health issues such as obesity and overweight by providing infrastructure which
supports physical activity. A county level study in Oregon supports evidence from previous literature that
obesity has a negative association with participation in non motorized trail based recreational activities
such as hiking. Healthier counties have higher number of active residents and the supply of and demand
for recreation activities is associated with physically active people. This kind of evidence can help
decision makers to provide more access to green space and outdoor recreation in areas lacking them so as
to encourage people to engage in physical activity and live a healthier life (Rosenberger, 2009). A
Glasgow study looked into factors which determine why people choose to use or not use local public
green space. If a green space is walkable and well connected, it was perceived to enhance social cohesion
at a community level. A feeling of integration and inclusion reduced barriers to park use such as presence

6. of anti social activity. The study concluded that apart from providing high quality resources such as parks,
footpaths, activities and lighting, enhanced social cohesion will increase access to green space and as a
result promote health and well being (Seaman, 2010). Design interventions which aim at motorist’s safety
often have opposite effects on the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists. Human behavior is associated with
built environment features which might be a cause of pedestrian injuries due to crash. One particular
study looked at whether injuries are caused by random errors or are the result of built environment
characteristics. There was a stronger association between crashes and characteristics of the built
environment. It suggests that urban designs that balance tensions between vehicle speeds and traffic
conflicts can enhance pedestrian and cyclists safety as well safety of the motorists (Dumbaugh, 2011).
The concept of ‘Street Reclaiming’ is an interesting feature in built environment modifications promoting
health. This concept refers to people taking control of streets from automobile domination creating livable
streets and vibrant communities. Streets can be a place to play and socialize. According to Engwicht, it
should start with traffic reduction, designing themes such as entryway, canopy ceilings, and street
furniture. The residents should agree to abide by the rules of a Traffic Reduction Treaty which will make
them more responsible while driving and allow them to share street space with people walking and
biking. Physical improvements like traffic circles, raised intersections, speed breakers, landscaping to
enhance aesthetics, and adding interesting features can determine the driving behaviors and reduce road
injuries from traffic (Hinkelman, 1997).

7. Image 1. Google image of Hurt Park; Downtown Atlanta. Retrieved on April 18th
, 2012
Hurt Park at Georgia State University is a small green space in Downtown Atlanta. The ownership of the
park is shared between Georgia State University and the City of Atlanta2
.Hurt Park is in the triangle
between Edgewood Avenue, Courtland Street, and Gilmer Street. This park opened in 1940 and was
among one of the first parks in Downtown Atlanta. It represented one of the great achievements of Mayor
William B. Hartsfield’s first administration. Hurt Park is named after banker, real estate and streetcar
developer Joel Hurt. The park and its fountain were funded partly by the Woodruff Foundation and were
designed by the noted landscape architect William C. Pauley. They were one of downtown Atlanta's
principal attractions during the 1940s and 1950s3
.
In spite of being located in a popular area in Downtown Atlanta close to the Georgia State campus, the
park is underutilized. It is thronged by homeless people who make it less attractive to others. There is not
enough lighting which is a safety concern. The fountain, which used to be one of its major attractions, is
non functional. In a nutshell, the Park has a lot of potential to be used for recreation as well as a space for
relaxation but due to lack of maintenance and important safety concerns, the Park is underutilized.
2
http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM20JM_Hurt_Park_at_Georgia_State_University_Atlanta_Ga
3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurt_Park_%28Atlanta%29

8. Image 2. Proposed design of Hurt Park; Downtown Atlanta.
The reviews for Hurt Park in the Yelp website4
give us a pretty good idea how unpopular the Park is
among general public although many would love to spend time in the Park. One of the reviewers
mentions, ‘Hurt Park punches me in the stomach and knocks the breath out of me in springtime per the
blazing red buds that bloom along its edge. While the homeless population tends to aggregate at Hurt
Park, I've had pleasant lunchtime experiences here, although seating is admittedly limited’.
The proposed design is for reviving the lost glory of Hurt Park and making it more attractive and
functional for people who work or study in the neighboring area. To give a boost to the Park, the first
design element would include remodeling the existing fountain and adding another water feature which
will be low maintenance. There will be more park benches added so that people can have enough place to
sit and relax while in the Park. The existing walking tracks would be redesigned and a new track would
now run along the periphery of the Park. The Park will now have iron fencing all around with gates in the
three corners. More trees will be added to the existing ones which will provide shade as well as enhance
aesthetics. Pedestrian friendly street lights will now be placed along the boundary which will enhance
safety. The sidewalks will be broadened and environment friendly permeable pavers like Aqua-Bric and
Subterra5
would be used to pave sidewalks and walking/running tracks.
4
http://www.yelp.com/biz/hurt-park-atlanta
5
http://www.greenstonepavers.com/docs/brochr-grnstn-R1.pdf

9. Image 3. Hurt Park’s ‘Fountain of Light’. Picture taken on March 7, 2012
The Hurt Park’s fountain was a major attraction when it was functional. It was an electric fountain with
seventy-eight bulbs from one hundred watts to fifteen hundred. It played for twenty minutes at a time,
giving numerous changes of pattern and color before it repeated its rainbow symphony. It was designed
by Atlanta sculptor Julian Harris and cost seventeen hundred dollars. This interesting feature was
presented to the city through the Emily and Ernest Woodruff Foundation from Boylston's Atlanta - Its
Lore, Legends and Laughter6
.
Presently, the fountain is non-functional. It poses a health threat to the people using the park since there is
standing water which is breeding ground for mosquitoes if not treated regularly. Standing water can also
have issues such as algae formation, and foul odors. Aesthetically this fountain does not look attractive.
There is no seating area around the fountain as well where people can socialize or relax. The flower beds
and shrubs around the fountain are not pruned regularly and hence, they do not grow as intended. The non
functional lights which used to be a part of the display are now an eyesore and leave people wondering
why they are still there.
6
http://jolomo.net/atlanta/hurt-fountain.html

10. Image 4. Redesigned Fountain at Hurt Park
The proposed design for the fountain will eliminate the light bulbs since the fountain of light does not
operate anymore. The new design does not propose restarting the lights display because it is expensive
and therefore not sustainable. Instead, there will be a simple water fountain which will be easier to
maintain. Soft music can be played at the background during daytime which will give it a dramatic effect
while still being simple and relaxing. The fountain will provide people with hours of relaxation and
enjoyment. To make it more environment friendly, the water used for the fountain can be recycled water
from the University.
A water feature adds a focal point to any space. If properly landscaped, it can attract birds and butterflies
which is a great sight in itself. Various species of fish can thrive in the shallow pond beneath the water
feature. It also adds a cool spot to hang during summer. The new design will introduce an additional water
feature, as seen in the image. This will be a long, shallow (about 3 feet deep) water tank which will be in
the form of an arc in front of the new fountain model. The tank will have broad concrete walls whose tops
can serve as seating space (similar to what we see in Woodruff Park). Aquatic plants such as water lily
and lotus will add to the aesthetics of the tank. Several fish species which can live in shallow water bodies
can be introduced in the tank which will be another attractive feature. Student volunteers from the
Georgia State University can take responsibility of the aquatic life in the water tank. There will be more
shade trees planted along the tank and fountain so as to reduce loss of water through evaporation.

11. Image 5. Unmaintained lawn at Hurt Park. Picture taken on March 7, 2012
A major issue with the Hurt Park is its lack of maintenance. As evident from the picture, the grass cover
of the lawn is thin and thatchy. The lawn lacks much needed attention which could make the park look
greener and more appealing. Unmaintained lawn or parks like the one above can encourage growth of
lawn spurs, prevalent in southern states in the United States. Lawn spurs, also produce prickly hardened
seed husks which can stick to clothing and skin. They are difficult to spot; as a result, people
unknowingly step on sharp lawn spurs when they are barefoot or wearing sandals. The outer surface of
the spur has small spikes that readily penetrate the skin and may cause considerable pain7
. Maintaining a
healthy lawn can prevent lawn spurs from invading but this needs regular attention. Since regular mowing
and de-weeding might not be a sustainable procedure, low maintenance, no mow grass seeds can be used
instead. One can purchase this kind of grass which will be low in maintenance because of its moisture
holding capacity and only grow 1 to 6 inches high which will eliminate frequent mowing. The No Mow
Grass Seed requires no chemicals to maintain it, and the thick grass cover prevents weeds from reaching
the ground to sprout. Moreover, the suppliers claim that the grass seed reduce pest control because
common hiding spots are eliminated8
.
7
http://www.ehow.com/info_8758598_dangers-lawn-spurs.html
8
http://nomowgrass.com/

12. Image 6. New walking and running trails along with additional park benches.
The existing paved trails in the park do not facilitate running and walking. They are mostly used as
thoroughfares from one corner of the park to the other. The new design proposes trails that will rum all
around the periphery of the park which will be approximately 0.3 miles in length. Some of the tracks will
also extend through the center of the Park for people who might just want to walk in the park. This will
open up opportunities for people, especially GSU students to engage in physical activities such as running
or jogging, as well as a leisurely stroll in the park. Late spring and summer is usually the best time to
spend outdoors and enjoy contact with nature.
As pointed out earlier, the Park currently does not have enough seating places such as benches which
discourage people from spending time over here. The new design proposes several new park benches
which will be naturally resistant to weather elements. These will be placed all along the trail as well as
close to the fountain. Due to presence of shade trees and now a well maintained lawn, more people can be
expected to spend time in the Park, playing, reading, socializing or exercising. Among various activities,
Georgia State University can arrange for outdoor classes during late spring or early fall. This space can
also be used for arranging music festivals by the students or local musicians. Moreover, the space can be
used to organize food drives for the homeless people in Downtown Atlanta by the students and staff of the
University.

13. Image 7. Gilmer Street segment along Hurt Park. Picture taken on March 7, 2012
The Gilmer street in front of the GSU campus permits one way traffic and is a two lane road with on
street parking provisions on both sides. The traffic volume in this particular street segment is much lower
than the other two segments-Edgewood Avenue and Courtland Street. One of the major safety concerns of
this street is that students who are coming from the Edgewood Avenue side through the Hurt Park tend to
cross the street midway where there are no crosswalks to enter the Arts and Humanities building as well
as the Sparks Hall. The street has some potential which can make it interesting as well as attractive to the
student community. For instance, this street has a high pedestrian traffic which can attract local food
business such as food trucks and food vendors. Unlike Aderhold Hall on Luckie Street, which has several
eating joints convenient to the students, this side of the GSU campus lack any such facility. The nearest
eating place is the Panther Den located within University Center. Moreover, the street becomes deserted
after normal School hours which are a safety issue for students who have classes till late in the evening or
who stay back in the library to study till late. Being adjacent to the Hurt Park, the street is perceived
unsafe by many students because of the homeless people in and around the Park. One student mentioned,
‘Ahhhhh Hurt Park! Where homeless people hangout and mess with us Georgia State Univ. students!!9
’
9
http://www.yelp.com/biz/hurt-park-atlanta

14. Image 8. Redesigned Gilmer Street segment along Hurt Park portraying a livable street concept
Cities across the country are taking charge of their streets and are coming up with toolkits which support
designs that can make streets places to linger and places to cherish10
. As pointed out above, the Gilmer
Street segment in between Hurt park and Georgia State campus has the potential to be converted into a
similar space which is livable, lively, aesthetically appealing, functional as well as safe. To create such a
space, it can be proposed that the street be converted to a no motor vehicle space for a couple of days in
the week during which time the street will be a gathering place for people to interact, socialize and enjoy
some outdoor time with friends. Since food trucks are now legal in Georgia, and there are several of them
in places like Midtown, we can introduce the concept of street food culture on the GSU campus on
Tuesdays and Fridays when there will be vendors like Yumbii food truck11
, Sandwich Buddha, Nectar and
Ultracakery12
. There will also be provisions for outdoor seating on the street and other road side stalls
such as fresh fruit vendors and florists. Since on street parking on Gilmer Street is a source of revenue for
the City, it is not feasible to completely block this segment from motor vehicles for all days of the week.
Moreover, one of the University parking lots has its exit on this street. Considering that loss of revenue
will not be an acceptable proposal and to reduce inconvenience, the proposal will initially target two days
a week and depending on its success and acceptance, alternative but convenient parking arrangements can
be made in the future and this livable street concept can be extended to cover all seven days.
10
http://www.planetizen.com/node/40394
11
http://www.foodtrucktalk.com/category/georgia
12
http://www.atlantastreetfood.com/

15. Image 9. Courtland Street segment. Picture taken on March 7th, 2012
The above image represents the four lanes Courtland Street which is a high vehicular traffic zone. The
pedestrian traffic is also high because this section of the street has the Alumni Hall. The crosswalks are
located on the two ends of the segment, intersections of Courtland and Gilmer and Courtland and
Edgewood. It is a common sight that students as well as GSU staff often cross the street in between where
there are no crosswalks. In spite of being a broad street for one way traffic, there is no assigned bike lane
on this street. The street also has on street parking provisions. Due to all these factors, the Courtland street
segment is a potential safety hazard for pedestrians. The drivers rarely drive within the prescribed speed
limit.
As pointed out by Dumbaugh in his article Designing for the Safety of Pedestrians, Cyclists, and
Motorists in Urban Environment, design solutions which aim to improve pedestrian safety and safety of
motorists do not go hand in hand. Instead, it is commonly understood that traffic crashes are the result of
random driver error. But there is a possibility that the behavior of drivers can be modified if certain
characteristics of the built environment are changed to facilitate pedestrian safety (Dumbaugh, 2011). The
streets should be designed in a manner which makes driving on a high pedestrian traffic area slow by
default. The streets should facilitate sharing road space with non motorized modes of transport such as
bicycles and the streets design should make everyone feel safe to use it.

16. Image 10. Redesigned Courtland Street segment prioritizing pedestrian safety
As mentioned above, the traffic on Courtland Street segment can be calmed by adopting some design
modifications. Currently it is a four lanes street with one way traffic, the new proposal suggests
transforming it into a two lanes street with a median and crosswalks in the middle. Usually medians are a
common feature in a two way road but this can be introduced as a traffic calming feature in this particular
segment. A median barrier will help to reduce traffic speed by reducing the number of lanes. There will
be on-street parking facility on either side of the segment and the lanes can now be shared by both motor
vehicles and bikes. For the safety of bicyclists, proper road signs will be provided which will make the
drivers aware of the shared road concept.
By reducing the number of lanes, with on street parking and a median, traffic speed will automatically
reduce making drivers more conscious of pedestrians on the street. Introducing an additional crosswalk in
between, conveniently located in front of the Alumni hall, will reduce the probability of pedestrians to
attempt an unsafe crossing to the other side of the road. The median will narrow the lanes and will also
provide the pedestrians with a safe place to stop. The median can be landscaped with decorative plants
which will make the street look more attractive and will also provide some shade.

17. Image 11. Edgewood Avenue segment. Picture taken on March 12th
, 2012
The Edgewood Avenue segment is a four lanes street with two ways traffic. It is one of the busiest streets
in Downtown Atlanta extending from Five Points Marta station to Inman Park Reynolds Town Marta
station. This segment of the street houses Hurt Park on one side and buildings such as the Woodruff
Volunteer Service center on the other. Due to its proximity to the Georgia State campus, there is high
pedestrian traffic on this street. As is evident from the above picture, there are no crosswalks mid
intersection; crosswalks are located at the Peachtree Center intersection and at the Courtland Street
intersection. As a result, people whose destination is the Woodruff Volunteer Service center, tend to cross
the street in between. This is more dangerous than the Courtland Street segment because the traffic is two
ways over here and cars are most often than not speeding. Crossing roadways without medians can be
dangerous. There is evidence that the pedestrian crash risk for crossing the arterial road without a median
was 6.48 times higher than for crossing the arterial with a median13
. The likelihood of pedestrian–vehicle
collision increases with the number of lanes and road width. Retrofitting or narrowing the roads might be
able to reduce the risk of pedestrian crashes (Ukkusuri, S. 2011). Traffic calming techniques such as
narrower lanes, medians, crosswalks can benefit pedestrians by slowing down cars and reducing the
volume at a given point in time.
13
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike/tools_solve/medians_trifold/#footnote_01
Source: Wilson, Petritsch, Quantifying Countermeasure Effectiveness—Orlando, FL, PBIC, November 2008.

18. Image 12. Edgewood Avenue segment redesigned.
The most important feature of the Edgewood Avenue is that it is part of the Downtown Loop of the
Atlanta Streetcar project. This segment of the Streetcar will have a single track running eastward from
Pryor Street to Jackson Street. As part of the project there will be features such as enhanced streetcar
stops with kiosks, lighting, benches, and trash cans. The pedestrian facilities will be upgraded such as
wider sidewalks, new crosswalks, etc. Striped bicycle lanes, sharrows and innovative intersection
treatments will facilitate bicycling. The project also will also include upgraded traffic signals systems14
.
In addition to the Streetcar project, the Edgewood Avenue traffic can be calmed by introducing a median
in place of the existing left turn lane to Peachtree Center between two way traffic. This will keep the
number of lanes effectively same but with a median on the street, the general tendency of drivers will be
to slow down. The Streetcar, bikes and cars sharing the same lanes will be another contributing factor
towards slower traffic. It can be anticipated that with the Downtown loop becoming functional in the near
future, people currently driving Downtown might be less reliant on personal cars and instead take the
Streetcar to reach their destination. The Streetcar project also suggests upgrading pedestrian safety with
new crosswalks. A mid intersection crosswalk on this segment might make crossing the street safer and
convenient.
14
http://www.atlantadowntown.com/initiatives/atlanta-streetcar

19. Image 13. Installing iron gates at the three corners along with an iron fence will enhance the safety of
the park.
Urban parks like the Hurt Park are often places of criminal activity and people feel unsafe especially
during off peak hours. This is mostly because urban parks are difficult to police and unless there is some
major criminal incident, the city police do not consider them as a priority. Natural vegetation in parks
obstructs surveillance, and installing closed circuit television (CCTV) might not often be a feasible option
or be able to cover the whole park. Common criminal activities in urban parks are disorderly youth in
public places, drug dealing in open-air markets, graffiti, illicit sexual activity in public places,
panhandling, people with mental illness, and underage drinking (Hilborn, 2009). Some of these activities
have also been observed by park goers in Hurt Park15
.
Parks are enclosed by a boundary barrier such as a wall or a fence. Some can even have an entrance gate
which can be locked after park hours. This kind of design features can enhance safety of parks by making
them difficult to access after it is closed by people who engage in illegal activities in such places. The
fence or boundary along with the gate should not be solid which can obstruct view and make people
inside the park feel isolated and vulnerable. Iron gates and fences can be good alternatives to solve this
problem. Building gates make create a perception that the place is safer.
15
http://www.yelp.com/biz/hurt-park-atlanta

20. Image 14. Introducing amenities like public restrooms and drinking water fountains make a public
space more attractive and functional
Design recommendations for existing Downtown parks and open spaces like the Hurt Park should include
providing amenities so as to increase their usability. One of the most important amenities a park should
have is public restrooms. People would not like to spend longer hours in parks if it did not have decent
restrooms. The restrooms should also be Americans with Disability Act (ADA) approved so that every
section of the society can use it without difficulty. The Woodruff Park, also in Downtown Atlanta, has
such a restroom which might be one of the reasons why it draws more park users than Hurt Park.
Moreover, if Gilmer Street is opened to street food vendors and food trucks during the week, a restroom
will become more important and convenient for the crowd who want to spend their time outside enjoying
nature.
Another important amenity in any park should be the availability of drinking water. People who might be
using the park for exercise or just sit there on a warm sunny day would appreciate drinking water
fountains located at convenient spots. Presently, there are a couple of water fountains in Hurt Park but
they are non-functional. New water fountains will be introduced in the redesign plan to make the park
users stay more comfortable.

21. Image 15. Using energy efficient solar lighting in the Park and planting more trees
Park lighting is an important safety feature. But it is often expensive to install enough lights in parks. A
growing trend in outdoor lighting has been solar powered lights which are sustainable, environment
friendly and most importantly the source of energy is free. It can save thousands of dollars over
traditional park lights when installed16
. Not only is it a green alternative to traditional lights, it also
reduces risks of fire, do not emit any hazardous fumes or chemicals and reduces air pollution making the
surroundings healthier.
To enhance the greenery in Hurt Park, the modified design will include planting more trees all along the
periphery of the Park. This will not only enhance the aesthetics of the Park but will also benefit health.
Studies have shown that human health is positively affected by greenery. The Landscape and Human
Health Laboratory (LHHL) at the University of Chicago, Urbana Champaign studies the connection
between greenery and human health. They examine the impacts of natural features such as trees, grass,
flowers, and green spaces on safety, crime, violence, and aggression; strength of community; well-being,
coping, vitality and attention, self-control, and learning17
. Trees in particular act as urban green filters
from small polluting particles due to traffic exhausts in urban settings (Meulen, 2011).
16
http://www.solarlighting.com/applications/parks-and-recreation
17
http://lhhl.illinois.edu/

22. Conclusion:
Urban parks and streets like the Hurt Park and its surrounding area have a lot of potentials for
development which can make them more livable and vibrant. A few design modifications like the ones
discussed above can transform an otherwise underutilized and dull space into an active living
environment. Urban parks are often perceived as unsafe if they are not used more frequently and this can
result in unused space which encourage anti social activities. Similarly, reclaiming streets to make them
more attractive and welcoming, like the Gilmer Street design proposal, will promote social interaction and
help building a social capital which in turn promotes health. The students of Georgia State University can
have an opportunity to interact with each other on a livable street, they can organize social events like
music festivals, art competitions, food drives for homeless people, fairs in this redesigned space which
will transform it into a more vibrant community. With enhanced activities, the Park area will also be more
functional and have increased number of users which will make it a safer place. The walking trails can
provide opportunity for physical activity as well as a place to relax and enjoy. The upcoming Streetcar
project on Edgewood Avenue will promote active living and reduce reliance on cars. The street
modifications will reduce traffic volume and speed, improving pedestrian safety.
It can be concluded that a design proposal like the one discussed here have a potential to transform that
part of the Georgia State campus. Factoring in the budget and financial requirements for a project of this
scale can serve as a model design for other similar projects in the City. This will be an example of how
built environment modifications can include physical and mental health promotion in our daily lifestyle.

23. Reference:
Adriano A.F. Hino (a, b., Rodrigo S. Reis (a, b., Olga L. Sarmiento, (., Diana C. Parra, (., & Ross C.
Brownson (d, e. (2011). The built environment and recreational physical activity among adults in
Curitiba, Brazil. Preventive Medicine, 52419-422. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.03.019
Brown, A., Vargas, R., Ang, A., & Pebley, A. (2008). The neighborhood food resource environment and
the health of residents with chronic conditions: the food resource environment and the health of residents.
Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 23(8), 1137-1144.
Corburn, J. (2004). Reconnecting urban planning and public health. Confronting the challenges in
reconnecting urban planning and public health. American Journal Of Public Health, 94(4), 541-546.
doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.4.541
Andrew L. Dannenberg (a, ⁎., Rajiv Bhatia, (., Brian L. Cole, (., Sarah K. Heaton, (., Jason D. Feldman,
(., & Candace D. Rutt, (. (2008). Review and special article: Use of Health Impact Assessment in the U.S.
27 Case Studies, 1999–2007. American Journal Of Preventive Medicine, 34241-256.
doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2007.11.015
Dumbaugh, E. (2011). Designing for the Safety of Pedestrians, Cyclists, and Motorists in Urban
Environments. Journal Of The American Planning Association, 77(1), 69.
doi:10.1080/01944363.2011.536101
Frumkin, H. (2002). Urban sprawl and public health. Public Health Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974),
117(3), 201-217.
Gihyoug Cho (a, ⁎., Daniel A. Rodríguez, (., & Asad J. Khattak, (. (2009). The role of the built
environment in explaining relationships between perceived and actual pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
Accident Analysis And Prevention, 41692-702. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.008
Hawkes, A. Sheridan, G. (2009). Rethinking the Street Space: Toolkits and Street Design Manuals.
Retrieved from http://www.planetizen.com/node/40394
Hilborn, J. (2009). Dealing With Crime and Disorder in Urban Parks. Center for Problem Oriented
Policing. US Department of Justice. ISBN: 1-932582-92-4. Retrieved from
http://www.popcenter.org/Responses/pdfs/urban_parks.pdf
Hinkelman, J. (n.d). Street reclaiming: Creating livable streets and vibrant communities. Journal Of The
American Planning Association, 67(3), 350-351.
Jacobs, D. E., Kelly, T., & Sobolewski, J. (2007). Linking Public Health, Housing, and Indoor
Environmental Policy: Successes and Challenges at Local and Federal Agencies in the United States.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 115(6), 976-982.
Jeremy J. Hess (a, ⁎., Josephine N. Malilay, (., & Alan J. Parkinson, (. (2008). The health impacts of
climate change: Climate Change. The Importance of Place. American Journal Of Preventive Medicine,
35(Theme Issue: Climate Change and the Health of the Public), 468-478.
doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.024

24. Killingsworth, R. R., James, K. K., & Morris, H. H. (2003). Promoting active living: why public health
needs parks and recreation. Parks & Recreation, 38(3), 48-52.
Meulen, G. (2011). URBAN GREEN FILTERS TO PROMOTE HEALTH OF RESIDENTS IN URBAN
AREAS. Journal Of Applied Sciences In Environmental Sanitation, 6(2), 213-224.
Mitchell, R. and Popham, F. (2007). Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England.
EVIDENCE BASED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTISE. BMJ Publishing group. Journal of
Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-), Vol. 61, No. 8 (August 2007),pp. 681-683.Retrieved from
http://www.jstor.org/stable/40666134
Northridge, J., Ramirez, O., Stingone, J., & Claudio, L. (n.d). The Role of Housing Type and Housing
Quality in Urban Children with Asthma. Journal Of Urban Health-Bulletin Of The New York Academy Of
Medicine, 87(2), 211-224.
Rosenberger, R.S., Bergerson, T.R., Kline,J.D. (2009). Macro-Linkages between Health and Outdoor
Recreation: The Role of Parks and Recreation Providers. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration.
(Fall 2009) Vol 27. No. 3 pp 8-20.
Satish Ukkusuri, Luis F. Miranda-Moreno, Gitakrishnan Ramadurai, & Jhael Isa-Tavarez (2011). The role
of built environment on pedestrian crash frequency. Safety Science, doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.09.012
Seaman, P.J., Jones, R., Ellaway, A. (2010). It’s not just about the park, it’s about integration too: why
people choose to use or not use urban greenspaces. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and
Physical Activity 2010, 7:78. Retrieved from http://www.ijbnpa.org/content/7/1/78