Technical
CONOPS
and Contract
Operations
Considerations
User-Driven
Requirements
Matrix
User-Driven
Development
Principles
How Will We Build It?
User-Driven
Development Framework
26
Copyright Protected. All rights reserved by Solid Thinking Corporation, 2014.
Operations Considerations
• User/Uses questions for design
reviews & CONOPS
• Ops SME biases, needs
User-Driven Requirements Matrix
• Development team’s goals
• User groups’ and other
stakeholders’ goals
• Informs requirements definition
process
Technical CONOPS and Contract
• Forces consensus on problem
being solved, changes to be
made, end result and operational
uses
• Documents design trades and
decisions, benefits to users (not
just features)
• Documents interdependencies
between user groups, operators,
subsystems, etc. (OpCon)
User-Driven Development Principles
• Becomes checklist for developers,
surrogate users, SMEs, system
architects & engineers
• Non-adherence requires
concurrence from SE, SA, Ops SME
and Mgmt
,27
Copyright Protected. All rights
reserved by Solid Thinking
Corporation, 2014.

User-Driven Development Framework

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Operations Considerations • User/Usesquestions for design reviews & CONOPS • Ops SME biases, needs User-Driven Requirements Matrix • Development team’s goals • User groups’ and other stakeholders’ goals • Informs requirements definition process Technical CONOPS and Contract • Forces consensus on problem being solved, changes to be made, end result and operational uses • Documents design trades and decisions, benefits to users (not just features) • Documents interdependencies between user groups, operators, subsystems, etc. (OpCon) User-Driven Development Principles • Becomes checklist for developers, surrogate users, SMEs, system architects & engineers • Non-adherence requires concurrence from SE, SA, Ops SME and Mgmt ,27 Copyright Protected. All rights reserved by Solid Thinking Corporation, 2014.