Infectious diseases project This project is PowerPoint, or a paper and is the mandatory 10% LIRN. 1- Guidelines for the Project: It could be either a PPT or a paper academic style - Include name of the disease and student(s) name - The paper must have academic style (you pick it) - The PPT must have a minimum of 8 slides, do not type many lines in one slide make it easy to follow, add photos. Either for the PPT or the paper, this work should have all of the following aspects about your disease: (Write each topic in the order given) · Name the infectious disease. · Mention the organism(s) that cause the disease. · Pick the most common organism that causes the disease and tell about the organism: Classification of the organism, organism’s habitat, general characteristics and virulence factors of the organism (Include pictures of the microorganism (bacteria, virus, helminth). · About the disease: · Write how is the disease transmitted, what is the portal(s) of entry and, where does it cause problems in humans’ body (what organs or system(s) are affected. · Signs and symptoms (include pictures of them). · Diagnosis and Treatment. · Prevention. · Epidemiology: Include cases in U.S. and/or where is mostly present, who gets affected (kids, women, men, all), and it there are cases of nosocomial infections or not and why. · References WHOEVER HAS NOT PICKED UP A TOPIC NEEDS TO SEND ME AN EMAIL WITH THE TOPIC YOU CHOSE. The style for the PPT or paper you decide it, just do it academically acceptable and interesting. Due Date: 10/24/2021 Project assignments Bacteria Topic Student Paper Presentation/PPT 1 Viral lung infections Maylin, Eddy Picked 2 Tuberculosis 3 folliculitis 4 Streptococcal skin diseases 5 Conjuctivitis 6 Trachoma and STD by C. trachomatis 7 Botulism 8 Meningitis 9 Tetanus Enny Picked 10 Peptic ulcers 11 Foodborne infections: Salmonellosis, 12 Amebiasis, or Taenia 13 Upper UTI’s 14 Lower UTI’s 15 HPV 16 Bacterial vaginosis 17 Gonorrhea 18 HSV-1, HSV-2 19 Syphilis 20 Sepsis 21 Zyca 22 Malaria 23 Endocarditis 24 Chikungunya 25 Yellow fever, or dengue 26 HIV, 27 Mononucleosis 28 Ebola, 29 Rabies 30 Prions 31 African sleeping sickness 32 Hepatitis 33 Lyme disease 34 COVID19 35 C. dif 36 Assignment: Psychotherapy for Clients With Addictive Disorders Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families. To prepare: · Review this week’s Learning Re ...

1. Infectious diseases project
This project is PowerPoint, or a paper and is the mandatory 10%
LIRN.
1- Guidelines for the Project: It could be either a PPT or a
paper academic style
- Include name of the disease and student(s) name
- The paper must have academic style (you pick it)
- The PPT must have a minimum of 8 slides, do not type many
lines in one slide make it easy to follow, add photos.
Either for the PPT or the paper, this work should have all of the
following aspects about your disease: (Write each topic in the
order given)
· Name the infectious disease.
· Mention the organism(s) that cause the disease.
· Pick the most common organism that causes the disease and
tell about the organism: Classification of the organism,
organism’s habitat, general characteristics and virulence factors
of the organism (Include pictures of the microorganism
(bacteria, virus, helminth).
· About the disease:
· Write how is the disease transmitted, what is the portal(s) of
entry and, where does it cause problems in humans’ body (what
organs or system(s) are affected.
· Signs and symptoms (include pictures of them).
· Diagnosis and Treatment.
· Prevention.
· Epidemiology: Include cases in U.S. and/or where is mostly
present, who gets affected (kids, women, men, all), and it there
are cases of nosocomial infections or not and why.
· References

2. WHOEVER HAS NOT PICKED UP A TOPIC NEEDS TO
SEND ME AN EMAIL WITH THE TOPIC YOU CHOSE.
The style for the PPT or paper you decide it, just do it
academically acceptable and interesting.
Due Date: 10/24/2021
Project assignments
Bacteria
Topic
Student
Paper
Presentation/PPT
1
Viral lung infections
Maylin, Eddy
Picked
2
Tuberculosis
3
folliculitis
4
Streptococcal skin diseases
5
Conjuctivitis

3. 6
Trachoma and STD by C. trachomatis
7
Botulism
8
Meningitis
9
Tetanus
Enny
Picked
10
Peptic ulcers
11
Foodborne infections: Salmonellosis,
12
Amebiasis, or Taenia

4. 13
Upper UTI’s
14
Lower UTI’s
15
HPV
16
Bacterial vaginosis
17
Gonorrhea
18
HSV-1, HSV-2
19
Syphilis
20

5. Sepsis
21
Zyca
22
Malaria
23
Endocarditis
24
Chikungunya
25
Yellow fever, or dengue
26
HIV,

6. 27
Mononucleosis
28
Ebola,
29
Rabies
30
Prions
31
African sleeping sickness
32
Hepatitis
33
Lyme disease
34

7. COVID19
35
C. dif
36
Assignment: Psychotherapy for Clients With Addictive
Disorders
Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients.
Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s
ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as
negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients
with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health
issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In
your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their
addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their
families.
To prepare:
· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the
insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive
disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for
Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use
the most with clients presenting with addiction.
· Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research

8. article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients,
families, or groups with addictive disorders.
The Assignment
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the
following. Your title and references slides do not count toward
the 5- to 10-slide limit.
· Provide an overview of the article you selected.
· What population (individual, group, or family) is under
consideration?
· What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a
new intervention or one that was already studied?
· What were the author’s claims?
· Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article.
Include whether this will translate into practice with your own
clients. If so, how? If not, why?
· Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your
ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
· Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes
to expand upon the content of your slides.
· Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting
sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your
sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you
used as the basis for this Assignment.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
Grid ViewList View
Excellent
90%–100%

9. Good
80%–89%
Fair
70%–79%
Poor
0%–69%
Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your
selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for
treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:
What population (individual, group, or family) is under
consideration?
What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new
intervention or one that was already used?
What were the author's claims?
Points:

10. Points Range:
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the
considered population.
The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described.
The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is
new or whether it was already studied.
The response includes a thorough and accurate description of
the author's claims.
Feedback:

11. Points:
Points Range:
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation defines the considered population.
The specific intervention used is described. The description
indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was
already studied.
The response includes a description of the author's claims.
Feedback:

12. Points:
Points Range:
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately
described.

13. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the
author's claims.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)

14. There is an incomplete definition of the considered population,
or it is missing.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately
described, or is missing.
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the
author's claims, or is missing.
Feedback:
o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article.
Include whether this will translate into practice with your
clients. If so, how? If not, why?
Points:

15. Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of
the findings of the selected article.
The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will
translate into practice with clients.
Feedback:

16. Points:
Points Range:
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The presentation includes a review of the findings of the
selected article.
The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will
translate into practice with clients.
Feedback:

17. Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or
incomplete review of the findings of the selected article.
The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not
the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.
Feedback:

18. Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review
of the findings of the selected article, or is missing.
The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not
the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is
missing.

19. Feedback:
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact
your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the
article.
Points:
Points Range:
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)

20. The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation
of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your
ability to use the findings presented in the article.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)

21. The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the
limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the
findings presented in the article.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

22. The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or
incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the
study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in
the article.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)

23. The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete
explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might
impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article,
or is missing.
Feedback:
•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes
to expand upon the content of your slides.
Points:
Points Range:
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)

24. The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to
comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)

25. The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to
expand upon the presentation slides.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

26. The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are
vague or contain small inaccuracies.
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range:
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)

27. The Notes function of the presentation partially or
inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not
included.
Feedback:
• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting
sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.
PDFs of sources are included with submission.
Points:
Points Range:

28. 9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-
reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are
included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with
submission.
Feedback:
Points:

29. Points Range:
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The presentation is supported with at least three peer-
reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are
included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with
submission.
Feedback:
Points:

30. Points Range:
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not
be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing.
Feedback:
Points:

31. Points Range:
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Style and Organization:
Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter
notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor
short and lacking substance.

32. Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in
presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity,
and clarity.
Feedback:

33. Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing
standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Feedback:
Points:

34. Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences
follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60% –
79% of the time.
Feedback:
Points:

35. Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the
time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

36. Points:
Points Range:
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no
errors.
Feedback:

37. Points:
Points Range:
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:

38. Points:
Points Range:
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Feedback:
Points:

39. Points Range:
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuatio n errors
that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:

40. Show Descriptions
Show Feedback
Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your
selected research article discussing a therapeutic appr oach for
treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
•Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:
What population (individual, group, or family) is under
consideration?
What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new
intervention or one that was already used?
What were the author's claims?--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
90%–100%
18 (18%) - 20 (20%)
The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the
considered population.
The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described.
The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is
new or whether it was already studied.

41. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of
the author's claims.
Good
80%–89%
16 (16%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation defines the considered population.
The specific intervention used is described. The description
indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was
already studied.
The response includes a description of the author's claims.
Fair
70%–79%
14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

42. There is an incomplete definition of the considered population.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately
described.
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the
author's claims.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 13 (13%)
There is an incomplete definition of the considered population,
or it is missing.
The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately
described, or is missing.
The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the
author's claims, or is missing.

43. Feedback:
o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article.
Include whether this will translate into practice with your
clients. If so, how? If not, why?--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent
90%–100%
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the
findings of the selected article.
The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will
translate into practice with clients.

44. Good
80%–89%
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The presentation includes a review of the findings of the
selected article.
The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will
translate into practice with clients.
Fair
70%–79%
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete
review of the findings of the selected article.
The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not
the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.

45. Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review
of the findings of the selected article, or is missing.
The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not
the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is
missing.
Feedback:
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact
your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the
article.--
Levels of Achievement:

46. Excellent
90%–100%
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation
of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your
ability to use the findings presented in the article.
Good
80%–89%
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the
limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the
findings presented in the article.
Fair
70%–79%
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)

47. The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete
explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might
impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete
explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might
impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article,
or is missing.
Feedback:
•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes
to expand upon the content of your slides.--
Levels of Achievement:

48. Excellent
90%–100%
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to
comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.
Good
80%–89%
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to
expand upon the presentation slides.
Fair
70%–79%
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)
The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are

49. vague or contain small inaccuracies.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately
expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.
Feedback:
• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting
sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.
PDFs of sources are included with submission.--
Levels of Achievement:
Excellent

50. 90%–100%
9 (9%) - 10 (10%)
The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-
reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are
included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with
submission.
Good
80%–89%
8 (8%) - 8 (8%)
The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on
the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission.
Fair
70%–79%
7 (7%) - 7 (7%)

51. The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not
be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 6 (6%)
The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed,
evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - Style and Organization:
Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter
notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor
short and lacking substance.--
Levels of Achievement:

52. Excellent
90%–100%
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in
presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity,
and clarity.
Good
80%–89%
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards
for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Fair
70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

53. Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences
follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60% –
79% of the time.
Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the
time.
Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation--
Levels of Achievement:

54. Excellent
90%–100%
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good
80%–89%
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair
70%–79%
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

55. Poor
0%–69%
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Feedback:
Total Points:
100
Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric