2. - 1 - www.oapso.ca
ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF
PROPERTY STANDARDS OFFICERS
CODE OF ETHICS
A Property Standards Officer owes certain duties to the public, to his employers, to other members of his profession, and to
himself and shall act at all times with:
a) fairness and loyalty to his associates, employers, and the public
b) fidelity to public needs
c) devotion to high ideals of personal honour and professional integrity.
A Property Standards Officer shall:
a) regard his duty to public welfare as paramount.
b) endeavour at all times to enhance the public regard for his profession and his Municipality, by extending the public
image thereof.
c) not give opinions or make statements on matters relating to property maintenance unless he clearly discloses on whose
behalf he is giving the opinion or making these statements.
d) not express publicly or while he is serving as a witness before a court, commission or other tribunal, opinions on
property maintenance matters that are not founded on adequate knowledge or honest conviction.
e) make effective provisions for safety of life and health of a person who may be affected by work for which he has
ordered and at all times shall act to correct or report any situation which he feels may endanger the safety or the
welfare of the public.
f) make effective provision for meeting lawful standards, rules or regulations relating to environmental control and
protection, in connection with any work he has ordered.
A Property Standards Officer for his employer shall:
a) act as a faithful agent or trustee and shall regard as confidential, any information obtained by him as to the business
affairs, methods or processes of his employer and avoid or disclose any conflict of interest which might influence his
actions or judgement.
b) present clearly to his employers, the consequences to be expected from any deviation proposed in the administration
of his duties and responsibilities as designated by statutes, where he is responsible for the technical adequacy of
professional work.
c) have no interest, direct or indirect, in any materials, supplies of equipment used by his employer or in any person of
firms receiving contracts from his employer unless he informs his employer in advance of the nature of the interest.
d) discloses immediately, any interest, direct or indirect which might in any way be construed as prejudicial to his
professional judgement.
e) carry out his work in accordance with applicable statutes, regulations, codes and by-laws.
f) co-operate as necessary in working with other professionals as may be engaged on a project.
A Property Standards Officer shall:
a) maintain the honour and integrity of his profession and without fear or favour expose before the proper tribunals
unprofessional or dishonest conduct by any other member of the profession.
b) Undertake only such work as he is competent to perform by virtue of his training and experience, and where advisable,
retain and co-operate with other professionals or specialists
3. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 2 - www.oapso.ca
President’s Message
Ladies and Gentlemen fellow Property
Standards Officers,
This is the last message I shall be writing as
your President.
Over the years my involvement with the
association has progressed from casual to
complex. I follow some giants in the field, the
Grand Master Mr Brian Alec from Hamilton
who was instrumental in obtaing permission from the provincial
government for OAPSO to certify Property Standards Officers, this
certification required that we develop an education program, Mr
Rick McGee from Richmond Hill, who chaired the first Education
committee that developed the Certification training, and Mr
Len Creamer from Clarington, who fine tuned that program into
the format we use today. Mr Joe Perrone, from North York, who
developed the technical side of enforcment into a fine art, Mr
Shayne Turner who in my opinion, was and currently is, one of the
finest By-law enforcment minds in the province, and my predecesor
Mr Garry (with 2 Rs) Anderson of Brantford who continues to provide
a stabalizing effect on the association with his quiet professionalism.
To all these and the many other influences I have had during my
career I say thank you.
As I pass the torch to the next generation, I wonder what the future
holds, will the province remove itself from the property standards
enforcement, and if so will it madate municipal property standards
by-laws. If municipal property standards by-laws are mandated,
will certification of officers be mandated and if so, will there be
a requirement to keep the certification current,( a maintenance
program). Will the technical aspects of property standards
enforcement be transferred to municipal building departments, and
if so, will building inspectors take a greater interest, or will lack luster
enforcement, lead to more tradgedies, like Elliot Lake.
I can only say this, that I hope governments of all levels realize
that the “devil is in the details.” It is the work of the dedicated
professionals who enforce the everyday standards, that the average
Canadian has come to expect as “the norm” and thousands of others
travel across the world to share, that ensure the standards of living
we enjoy are maintained. It is rewarding, but largely unrecognized
or unappreciated work, and to all of you who perform it, I say this,
“keep up the good work,” I salute you.
Regards
Warwick R. Perrin
OAPSO President.
Inside
Issuethis
CODE OF ETHICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
President’s Message . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
From the Editor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
ANNUAL TRAINING SEMINAR
AND CONFERENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
ATS APPLICATION FORM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Important Information
to Applicants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Part 4 Conference Schedule . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1st
Annual Bill Smith Memorial Golf
Tournament . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
NOTHING VENTURED, NOTHING GAINED . . . 8
Water Damage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
The Occupy Movement Continues . . . . 11
Rooming house investigation . . . . . . . . 13
The Future of Code Officials . . . . . . . . . . . 15
RICHMOND BYLAW OFFICER SAVEs DOG . . 15
Brownfields Ontario . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Animals on the Job . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Roof collapse leads to evacuation . . 19
Legal Corner: Details on Property
Standards Orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
The Importance of Your Membership . . 21
2015 OAPSO MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION . . . . 22
Appeal Committee Training . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
Application for Certified Property
Standards Officer CPSO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
OAPSO VOTING PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
NOTICE OF MOTION TO AMEND
BY-LAW 1-2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
4. - 3 - www.oapso.ca
From the Editor
Recently I had a conversation with a fellow Board member about the reasons
behind why we do what we do as a BOD for OAPSO. We spoke about when
considering such a position, how the obvious reasons come to mind, “because
I want to be part of something”, “It sounds like a lot of fun” and yes because it
looks good on a resume; however we quickly realized how these reasons soon
become a thing of the past once we begin our journey. Yes they are still part of why we do this, but being
a Board of Director becomes so much more once we have hooked you.
If you were to ask any one of your Directors why they continue to stay on and do what they do, I can
assure their reasons will go far beyond the ordinary. Some would likely say, “Why wouldn’t I be part of
this organization? The other BOD’s are amazing, enthusiastic people who I consider to be part of my
extended family”, “OAPSO is a passion of mine that I love seeing bloom”, “I do this because I love seeing
the looks on the members faces each year, and seeing them enjoy their experiences with OAPSO”, “OAPSO
has become a part of me”, I could go on and on, but I digress.
OAPSO’s 2015 Board of Directors will see some changes take place in May, with some BOD’s stepping
down and some taking on new roles and positions; for those of us remaining on the Board this will be
a bittersweet interlude into the 2016 year. We will be excited to embrace the new individuals that will
eagerly take on the vacant Director positions, however; tears will be shed for those moving forward down
their new paths. A celebration extraordinaire will surely be had for all….
For those members attending the ATS this year, please take a moment to say thanks to those that make it
all happen. And in return we; your current, past and future Board of Directors, would like to say thank you
to all the members that have supported, believed and continue to be a part of OAPSO and help it thrive,
you are the reason we do this!
- 3 - www.oapso.ca
5. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 4 - www.oapso.ca
2015ANNUAL TRAINING SEMINAR AND CONFERENCE
OAPSO is
anticipating one
of their best
years yet for their
Annual Training
session. Our Board
of Directors have
been busy preparing and working vigorously to ensure that
our members have a fulfilling week, that will include the
usual training with the most up to date information, some
great networking opportunities and an ability to enjoying the
ambiance and culture Kingston has to offer.
Set within the heart of Kingston along the Lake Ontario coast
line you will find the St. Lawrence Conference and Residence
Centre. From May 25th to May 29th 2015 this newly
renovated and up to date Campus and Residence Centre
will be host to OAPSO’s 2015 Annual Training and Seminar
Conference.
From the moment
you arrive, you notice
the outstanding
attributes of this well
maintained and stylish
campus, as well as all
the added benefits
it has to offer. From
the extravagant lobby to the accommodating residence staff,
your satisfaction is guaranteed.
In addition to the beautiful landscaping and interior
finishes, the Residence staff are happy to grant us with a
unique opportunity, providing each member with their own
private suite. These single rooms include a private three
piece bathroom, wardrobe, mini fridge, study area and air
conditioning. Each room overlooks one of the many breath
taking views of the property, allowing each member to relax
in style at the end of their busy day.
And let’s not forget the Monday Night Social. The OAPSO
Board of Directors
are excited to
invite you to join
us on a three hour
tour of the 1000
Islands aboard
The River Queen.
Discover local islands and sights such as Fort Henry, Kingston
Penitentiary, and the Museum Ship, The Alexander Henry
along Kingston’s historic waterfront. In addition to the
breathtaking sites of the St. Lawrence River, you will also
enjoy a superb buffet style sit down meal. This is sure to be
an astounding evening, filled with good times and provide
for excellent networking opportunities. We look forward to
seeing everyone there.
In addition to the Conference
this year, OAPSO is organizing its
First Annual Bill Smith Memorial
Golf Tournament. This activity
is perfect for your networking
needs and will give you an ability
to relax before your busy week
ahead. All proceeds earned from
the Tournament will be donated
to Habitat for Humanity, just as
Bill would have wanted!
Registration forms are available on line
and within the Newsletter, but hurry,
because registration closes May 15, 2015.
This year “Two for Show” will be
performing at the President’s Dinner. This
eclectic variety act will surly have you
laughing, singing and dancing! I promise
you will be entertained!
ANNUAL TRAINING
SEMINAR AND CONFERENCE
2016
The OAPSO Board is happy to announce the location
of the 2016 ATS: Canadore College, North Bay!
6. - 5 - www.oapso.ca
APPLICATION FORM
Certified Property Standards Officer Training Program-2015 Annual Training Seminar
(St. Lawrence College, Kingston, Ontario - May 25th to 29th, 2015)
First
Name:
Last
Name:
M £
F £
Municipality or
Employer:
Address to which all correspondence is to be sent:
Email: Phone:
ATTENDANCE INFORMATION: Note: With the exception of the challenge test, exams and materials will be provided
only to participants who attend all week.
£ All meals, accommodation,
training materials and exam
£ All meals and training
materials and exam
£ Accommodation and
meals provided
For “Single Day” attendance please indicate which date(s) attending:
PLEASE INDICATE WHICH COURSE YOU
WOULD LIKE TO ATTEND: FULL DAY SINGLE DAY NON MEMBER
Part 1 (Basic) $1,035.00 $708.00 N/A $1,215.00
Part 2 (Intermediate) $1,035.00 $708.00 N/A $1,215.00
Part 3 (Advanced) $1,035.00 $708.00 N/A $1, 215.00
Part 4 (Professional Development) $840.00 $610.00 $180.00 $940.00
A cheque, in the amount of $_______________ is attached, (cheques must be made payable to O.A.P.S.O.).
Please note: Refunds are subject to a 20% administration fee
PLEASE MAIL APPLICATIONS AND PAYMENTS TO: PLEASE ADVISE OF ANY FOOD ALLERGIES:
Applicant Signature:
O.A.P.S.O.
C/O Craig Calder, Vice President
140 Whitewater Street
Ottawa, Ontario K2G 7A3
DAY SINGLE
DAYFull
7. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 6 - www.oapso.ca
Important Information
to Applicants
The Ontario Association of Property Standards Officers is the only
organization within the Province of Ontario authorized by the
Provincial Government to Certify Property Standards Officers.
This is achieved by successful completion of three components:
1. Completing successfully the three OAPSO
certification training programs, (Parts 1, 2, 3),
2. Presenting proof to the OAPSO Certification Chair
of two years’ experience in the enforcement and/or
administration of a Property Standards By-law
3. Submitting the applicable Certification Fee
The certification program is offered yearly at our annual conference
and training sessions. Each certification course consists of one
week of classroom instruction along with practical exercises and a
final examination. As we are a Provincial Association, the venue for
the annual conference and training seminar changes every year.
Accommodation is predominately in a college/university residence
setting. The accommodation usually consists of two or more
private bedrooms, with a shared bathroom and kitchen area. Each
delegate will therefore have their own private room.
As a result of being hosted at different locations each year, the
Association, its delegates and guests are required to abide by the
rules of the institution.
By signing this application the applicant agrees to observe the rules
of the host institution and to conduct themselves in a professional
manner at all times. Any reported or observed behaviour that could
bring an employer or the Association into disrepute may result in a
written report being forwarded to the employer of the applicant,
or the applicant may be requested to return home, with no refund
or opportunity to take the course examination.
Part 4 Conference Schedule
OAPSO PART IV AGENDA 2015 St. Lawrence College Kingston
TIMES MONDAY MAY 25th TUESDAY MAY 26th WEDNESDAY MAY 27th
09:00-10:15 (75) Understanding Mental Health
Emergency preparedness
for pets
Health Canada - Marijuana
Licences and Legislation overview
break
10:30 - 12:00 (90) cont.. cont.. Resolving and `Preventing Conflict
lunch
13:00-14:15 (75)
Certification Training - suicide
safe talk - Living Works
Animal behaviour
Annual General Meeting
break
14:30-1600 (90) cont… cont…
2015 KINGSTON ATS INSTRUCTORS
Your proposed Instructor Team for 2015 looks to be as follows:
Part 1 Course Part 2 Course Part 3 Course
Part 1 Construction - John Lane
Part 1 Legal - Garry Anderson
Part 1 Investigation - Warwick Perrin
Part 2 Construction - Brian Green
Part 2 Legal - Philip Cassata
Part 2 Investigation - Len Creamer
Part 3 Construction - Shelly Kunkel
Part 3 Legal - Shayne Turner
Part 3 Investigation - Matt Richardson
8. - 7 - www.oapso.ca
TO REGISTER OR FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristen Bickers OAPSO Board of Director
519-348-8429 ext. 232 | 226-921-1423 (C) | ckbickers@hotmail.com
Cost Per Registrant: $75.00 (Cost includes 18 holes of golf, BBQ lunch and door prizes)
THE BILL SMITH MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT REGISTRATION FORM
Registrants Name:
Municipality:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
Preferred T-Time:
Team Name: (If team has
already been established)
Team Members: 1. 2.
3. 4.
Amount included:
$75.00 p/registrant
Cheques payable to the Ontario Association of Property Standards Officers:
Or email to ckbickers@hotmail.com
In order to ensure T-times Registration is due by May 15, 2015
1st
Annual Bill Smith Memorial Golf Tournament
May 24, 2015 – 1025 Len Birchall Way Kingston, ON K7M 4M1
T-Times: 8:30 a.m. till 10:00 a.m.
* Note: For registrants wishing to stay the evening of May 23rd, reservations may be made through either St. Lawrence College Residence or a nearby hotel.
Registrants will be responsible for additional room costs.
C/O: Kristen Bickers CPSO, MLEO(C)
181 Edward St. P.O. Box 133
Arthur, ON
N0G 1A0
9. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
NOTHING VENTURED, NOTHING GAINED
Dear Members,
As is so typical and ironic in many aspects of our lives, you often
take for granted, and do not fully appreciate, relationships in your life
until you are faced with the realization they are to abruptly alter their
course.....keep laughing and smiling as this will be the memory I will hold
for you.
As you all may know by now I have taken a new direction in my career,
and therefore; I have stepped down from my position on the Board.
As the former Chapter Chair, I would like to thank each Chapter Chair
and their members for your tireless efforts and dedication to the
Association, the Chapters program and to your community. Ghandi
once said “Be the change you wish to see in the world”. I believe
that you, your executive branches and your Chapter members are
a testament to his statement. I have observed firsthand how your
meetings and interactions have been vital in creating safer and
prosperous places to live and work. You are a pillar to your community
and it has been my privilege to experience that and an honour to have
been able to serve you.
I am confident that you will continue your success with the next Chapter Chair. OAPSO believes in the idea
of this program and believe your Chapters are an invaluable resource for many of us. Continue to share your
knowledge and experiences with each other, and please don’t hesitate to contact any of the Board Members
with questions or issues you have.
For all my associates, friends and colleagues within this Association, I wish you all the very best and
continued successes; both in your professional and personal lives. And remember, although we are vast in
locations and increasing in numbers our circle is still small. I know that we will continue to run into each
other as time presses on. Until then, take care and God bless.
Best Regards,
Rodolfo (Rudy) Puyo
‘’Consult not your fears but your hopes and your dreams. Think not about your frustrations, but about your
unfulfilled potential. Concern yourself not with what you tried and failed in, but with what it is still possible
for you to do.’’
POPE JOHN XXIII
Rodolfo (Rudy) Puyo
- 8 - www.oapso.ca
10. - 9 - www.oapso.ca
Water Damage
When water causes property damage -- flooded basements, collapsing retaining walls, or soggy gardens, for example -- feuds
between neighbors often result. But the legal issues can be as muddy as the mess in your backyard
Surface Water Runoff
and Flooding
As a general rule, a neighbor is not liable for harm caused
by the natural conditions of land. If the land lies in such a
way that a particular amount of water is dumped onto your
backyard every year from rain running off your next-door
neighbor’s property, it’s not legally your neighbor’s fault. But
what if your neighbor landscapes his property so that the
amount of water running onto your yard doubles every year?
Your neighbor would say that the change is still caused by the
naturally occurring rain, not his landscaping. But you would
probably prefer to take your neighbor’s action into account. It
turns out that three different rules of liability govern situations
like this.
The reasonableness rule. In a majority of states, when one
neighbor alters the land and damage occurs to another,
the neighbor is liable for the damage if the alteration was
“unreasonable.” If you sue a neighbor over damage you’ve
suffered, judges will want proof that the neighbor did
something unreasonable that altered the natural condition
and caused your harm.
What Is Reasonable?
What is reasonable is decided by the courts on a case-by-
case basis. In some cases, courts have found gutters and
downspouts that send rainwater onto a neighbor’s property to
be “unreasonable.” To determine if something is reasonable, a
court may look at the following factors:
• the nature and importance of any improvements that
were made by the culvert
• whether or not the damage was reasonably
foreseeable by the ones who made the changes, and
• the extent of damage compared to the value of any
improvements.
( Rodrigues v. State, 472 P.2d 509 (Hawaii 1970).)
The “common enemy” rule: Lower landowners beware. In the
past, many courts treated excessive rainwater as a “common
enemy,” damaging property at random. Under this theory, you
were expected to take measures to protect your own property
from water coursing across the land. Even if one neighbor who
lived on higher ground diverted water to prevent flooding and
deposited it on you, you were expected to protect yourself
from the extra water.
Fortunately for lower landowners, the handful of states that
still follow the common enemy rule -- including Montana,
New York, and the District of Columbia -- have modified it.
These states allow a property owner to divert vagrant surface
water only if the work is not unusual or extraordinary and if
the property owner uses reasonable care to avoid damaging
adjoining property.
The “civil law” rule: Upper landowners beware. A number of
states follow a rule which is, in theory, the opposite of the
common enemy rule. The civil law rule holds that if a person
alters the natural flow of surface waters in any way that harms
the use and enjoyment of another property, that person will
be liable for that harm. Unlike the common enemy rule, which
requires lower landowners to fend for themselves, the civil
law rule holds upper landowners liable for any detrimental
changes in runoff patterns.
11. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
Like the common enemy rule, however, states no longer
apply this rule in its strictest form. States have developed
modifications and exceptions and now often judge the
behavior of both parties before saddling the upper landowner
with the bill. California, for example, expects that both parties
will act reasonably, which includes the duty of the lower
landowner to take protective steps.
Water Damage Caused
by Carelessness
If your neighbor acts unreasonably or carelessly with water on
his own property in a way that causes water damage to your
property, you can sue for compensation for your losses and
also ask the court to order the neighbor to stop the action.
Common culprits of this type of water damage include garden
hoses or sprinklers left running too long and water pipes
that get clogged, get old, leak, crack, or freeze. Owners are
responsible for their pipes and for damage they may cause,
even if the pipe just wears out or freezes in cold weather.
Tree roots, including roots from neighboring property, can
also damage pipes. Just as property owners are responsible
for damage caused by their broken pipes, tree owners may be
responsible for damage caused to another’s property by their
tree’s branches or roots. (For more information, see Neighbor
Disputes Over Trees.)
What the Neighbor
at Fault Must Pay For
If a neighbor is legally responsible for water damage you suffer,
you may be entitled to any or all of the following:
• compensation for cost of repairs and replacements
• compensation for expenses such as having to
stay at a motel
• reimbursement for medical expenses
• compensation for mental distress, if you have suffered
an underlying physical injury
• punitive damages, if a neighbor acted maliciously.
Judges also frequently order problems to be fixed if fixing
them would be easy and inexpensive. Replacing a downspout,
clearing away debris, or cleaning out a drain creates very little
burden on a property owner. Judges are less likely to order
someone to remove a retaining wall, relandscape property, or
redo a culvert.
Homeowners’ Insurance
Insurance in water damage cases is tricky. If the water comes
into your home from an inside source -- say, from a pipe in the
townhouse next door -- your ordinary homeowners’ insurance
should come into play. Contact your agent; your company
may pay for your damage and then go after whoever caused
it for repayment.
However, when the damage comes from outside rising water,
you may need flood insurance, even if your neighbor’s action
caused the problem. If the problem was caused at least in
part by a neighbor, your neighbor’s company may well pay you
directly. The neighbor’s insurance company might also tell your
neighbor to correct the problem -- or risk cancellation of the
insurance policy.
- 10 - www.oapso.ca
12. - 11 - www.oapso.ca
The Occupy Movement Continues
But now its Bed Bugs and they’re showing resistance.
Dan McCabe, Vice President,
Magical Pest Control
With the resurgence of the bed bug
population in North America, the search
for the magic bullet has never been getting
so much attention. This past year I had the
opportunity to attend the annual bed bug
summit in Chicago and found the message
was clearly focused on alternative treatments,
new technologies and biological discoveries.
This bed bug resurgence, commonly
attributed to increased travel and the transfer of second hand
furniture, is only some of the reasons why there is a steady
increase in the bed bug population. Resistance is another issue
that is causing all pest control operators to have serious cause
for concern.
So the question we might ask is, “what is resistance and how
do we avoid falling into this predicament?” Zach Adleman,
Associate Professor of Entomology at Virginia Tech explains
resistance this way. “The enzymes we discovered in bed bugs are
essentially the initial line of defense in breaking an insecticide
down before it reaches the nerve.” Knowing this, if we are going
to have any success in this fight against the bed bug, we need to
identify some of the root causes of resistance and correct them
before it’s too late.
One of the main contributors of chemical resistance is the
overuse or misuse of a pesticide. This is an issue that should
cause us all to be concerned; not only from a personal health
perspective but an environmental one as well. The message is
slowly getting out, but still too often homeowners are trying to
combat this pest on their own with over the counter products,
putting themselves and others at risk and contributing to the
resistance issue. Another factor is the lack of proper preparation
by the homeowner even when they do call in a professional.
This causes the need for multiple pesticide treatments. The
preparation for a proper treatment is laborious and if not done
thoroughly the bed bugs will survive.
While it would be a giant leap to say that the present spray
treatments are no longer effective, it is more of a realization
that resistance to these single mode of action products (also
known as synthetic pyrethroids) is becoming less and less
effective. Dr Potter of the University of Kentucky writes,
“today’s lack of reliable bed bug products requires we consider
all options for elimination.” It was for this very reason, methods
such as heat treatments,
Cryonite (freezing) and the
use of natural dusts have
gained such attention and
are proving to be the best
solutions to date.
So far heat is leading the
way as the most effective
treatment. The concept
is simple; bed bugs have
an extremely low thermal death point. Several sources (Usinger
1966, Gulmahamad 2002, Quarles 2007) report that adults and
nymphs die within 15 minutes at temperatures greater than 113ºF
and 60 minutes to kill eggs. Raising room temperatures above
the thermal death point and maintaining that temperature for
several hours will eliminate a bedbug infestation. Although
the concept may be simple, the actual procedure is not. Like
any pesticide treatment it requires professionally trained pest
control technicians to do the job correctly and safely.
Cryonite (freezing) is a similar concept but opposite to heat.
It uses extreme cold to solve bed bug infestations. Cryonite is
an environmentally safe technology that makes use of carbon
dioxide snow (dry ice). It freezes bed bugs to death, quickly and
at all stages, in one treatment. It is important to note that this
type of freezing is not like your freezer at home. It is extreme
cold at -110F.
The increased suspicion of resistance is what gave birth to these
alternative methods and what prompted Dr Michael Potter to
study the issue of chemical resistance in the bed bug population
in North America. He later followed up with an article on how
dust formulations may play an increasingly important role.
In his study the results revealed that of the 110 bed bug samples
he received from all across the country, 88% of them showed
resistance. The good news is that even in the most resistant
bed bug population greater than 90% died within four days and
100% died after 10 days when dust was used.
Dusts are not a new discovery in the control of pests. In fact,
dusts have been used for thousands of years and were the first
natural pest control products ever used. “It was encouraging to
see the high levels of mortality achieved with some dusts on
the market”, says Dr Potter. “Especially against bed bug strains
that are highly resistant to pyrethroid sprays.”
13. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 12 - www.oapso.ca
So how do dusts work? There are two main mechanisms by
which dusts can desiccate insects. Like superfine sandpaper,
certain dusts, including diatomaceous earth, kill principally by
abrading the protective outer layer of wax as the insect crawls
over or through the abrasive particles.1
Silica gels i.e. the little
packet found in vitamin bottles to absorb moisture, is contained
in Drione and functions more like a sponge absorbing the ultra
thin lipid layer onto the particle matrix.2
What advantage do dust products have over spray products?
One advantage is the residual effect of these products. Spray
formulations are designed to break down fairly quickly where
dusts can be effective for months. This is one of the reasons
why at least two spray treatments are required to solve a bed
bug infestation.
Another advantage of dust, Drione in particular, contains a
synergist that works to breakdown the enzyme in the bed bug
that causes resistance.
Dusts do not replace the use of sprays but are used to treat
areas where sprays should not be used such as wall sockets
and mattresses. The safety of these particular dusts is another
reason why these products should be used. Both Drione and
diatomaceous earth have very permissive labels and rate
extremely low in toxicity to humans, much less toxic than
commonly used household products.
To help understand toxicity levels, products are giving an LD50
rating; this means how many milligrams per kilogram of body
weight it would take to cause a 50% chance of mortality. It
also determines what type of labeling it receives. Highly toxic
product will have a stop sign with a skull and crossbones symbol
while less toxic products may have a triangle caution symbol,
the lower the rating (number) the higher the toxicity. The simple
way to consider LD50’s is: The closer to zero the LD50, the more
toxic the product.
The LD50 rating table is as follows:
0-500 mg/kg – very toxic
500 - 2500 mg/kg – moderately toxic
2500 - 5000 mg/kg – slightly toxic
5000 - considered - non toxic
Dusts such as Diatomaceous Earth and Silica Gel (AKA Drione)
have an LD50 rating of greater than 5000 and up to 8000 which
puts these products into the category of non-toxic. Just to draw
a comparison, common table salt has an LD50 rating of 3000
and considered to be two times more toxic than these dust
products.
What’s more is they have gone through rigorous testing and
study and have not only been approved for use by the Federal
Government but recommended for use in the most crucial
and sensitive areas. In conclusion, bed bugs are probably
the most difficult pest to solve and need the attention of
properly trained pest control technicians. The commonly used
disclaimer “do not try this at home” should be applied here.
Control methods such as heat treatment, Cyronite and dust
formulations such as Drione and diatomaceous earth rank high
in safety, effectiveness and versatility and should always be part
of a proper bed bug protocol but used in the hands of trained
professionals.
For more information on this topic contact dan@magicalpest.ca
1
Ebeling, W. 1971. “Sorptive dusts for pest control”
2
Dr Potter May 2009, “Are dusts the Bed Bug Bullet?”
14. - 13 - www.oapso.ca
Rooming house investigation
will shape June report to Toronto council
Etobicoke Guardian
A city investigation of Toronto rooming houses is
starting in a dozen neighbourhoods where the subject
is especially sensitive.
The 12 areas targetted for “tailored” consultations early
this spring match the largest clusters of complaints about
rooming houses - legal or illegal - over a two-year period.
Opinions from these places, including some districts
downtown where rooming houses are legal and others
along the city’s northern edge where they are not, will
shape a June report to Toronto council’s executive
committee. Recommendations in that report could lead
to legal rooming houses in Scarborough and North York,
something many councillors from those areas have feared
for years.
Movements toward a report and consultations on the
issue, promised during the last term of council, were
buried. But the latest attempt, approved by the executive
last summer, seems to be going ahead.
When councillors asked for a report on the consultation
at Scarborough Community Council in January, they were
shown a memo from Municipal Licensing and Standards
explaining how the first-stage of the consultation will
work.
Most of the largest complaint clusters in the city’s inner
suburbs are near post-secondary campuses, where supplies
of cheap student housing haven’t kept up to demand.
This includes York University Heights, Smithfield near the
Humber College North Campus, and Highland Creek near
University of Toronto Scarborough.
Other clusters are in areas such as Parkdale, Cabbagetown
and South Riverdale where rooming houses, if licensed and
inspected by the city, are legal.
The MLS memo says local councillors will be asked to
share “their experience with rooming houses and to assist
in identifying neighbourhoods and participants that should
be consulted during the review.”
Ratepayer groups, rooming house tenants and operators,
neighbours, social service agencies and post-secondary
institutions are among “key stakeholders” to consult, it
says.
A final report for the executive is expected by December
after a second round of consultation.
Chin Lee, Scarborough’s community council chairperson,
said there are other ways councillors can get involved,
such as hosting their own meetings.
Lee said he believes the consultation is needed, but added
many communities in Scarborough were designed for
“single-family” homes.
- Mike Adler
Courtesy, Inside Toronto.com
16. - 15 - www.oapso.ca
The Future of Code Officials
Published: 2015-03-05
ICC-NIBS Original Article
Results and Recommendations from a Demographic Survey
For more than a century, jurisdictions across
the United States have implemented building
codes to protect the health, safety and
welfare of their communities. As communities
have recognized the impact buildings have on
sustainability and resilience goals, the scope
of building codes has expanded.
To be effective, codes must have both a robust development
process and an enforcement infrastructure. America’s code
administration and enforcement professionals serve as the
backbone of such a code development and enforcement
process. However, there is a growing concern among code
developers and the building industry at
large that demographic shifts in the makeup of the code-related
workforce will challenge the current building regulatory system.
These concerns largely grew out of on-the-ground observation
by code officials—department staffs were getting older,
without additional younger participants entering the job
pool, and participants at professional organization and code
development meetings were generally older. The International
Code Council (ICC), a model code developer and advocate for
the adoption of codes leading to safe and healthy communities,
wanted to take action to address these important issues.
However, to help validate these initial observations, and to
support a wellinformed response to these perceived threats,
more concrete information was needed.
The ICC approached the National Institute of Building Sciences,
a non-profit organization established by the U.S. Congress to
work across the many stakeholders within the built environment,
to assist in this effort.
PDF: Future of Code Officials
RICHMOND BYLAW OFFICER LEAPS INTO RIVER
TO SAVE TRAPPED DOG
Richmond News
October 16, 2014 05:08 PM
A Richmond animal control officer jumped into the bitterly cold north
arm of the Fraser River to save a dog that had gotten loose from its
owner.
Without a thought for his own safety, bylaw officer Steffan Zamzow ripped
off his shirt Wednesday afternoon on River Road near the Richmond Night
Market and waded into the river to save the husky cross, which was caught
between two logs. Const. Alex Arias, (from left) with bylaw officers
Steffan Zamzow and Shane Burnham, and Altai the
husky-cross. Photograph By Melissa Franco
- 15 - www.oapso.ca
17. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 16 - www.oapso.ca
Brownfields Ontario
New uses for old land
Ontario’s Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing leads
government action on brownfields redevelopment.
Brownfields are vacant or underused sites with potential for
redevelopment. They may be contaminated, often due to former
industrial or commercial use. Brownfields are found in
all types of communities across the province.
In the last century, many industries operated within the city core
and along waterways. Some of these industries included mills,
factories, railway yards and service stations. Many have since
closed or moved away. The lands left behind – brownfields – lie
idle and often are contaminated.
Redeveloping brownfields is good for communities. By reusing
the land to make way for places like houses, offices, schools
and recreation centries, brownfield redevelopment encourages
intensification and the use of existing infrastructure, and
stimulates neighbourhood rejuvenation.
Brownfield redevelopment also benefits the environment by
improving air, water and soil quality, and by facilitating more
sustainable development patterns that can protect valuable
green spaces and agricultural lands.
In spring 2007, the Ontario government announced
comprehensive reforms that reaffirm our commitment to put
more brownfields into productive use while safeguarding the
environment, public health and safety. On December 29, 2009,
the Ministry of the Environment filed a series of regulatory
amendments to implement the balance of these reforms.
More information on regulatory reform is contained in the
Protecting the Environment section of this website.
*Source: Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation website
http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/maho/yohoyohe/inaiqu/inaiqu_002.cfm
What is Red Tag?
A red tag, also referred to as a warning tag, is placed on a furnace or hot water heater by a licensed technician to indicate that
your equipment is no longer safe to operate and either needs to be repaired or replaced. A licensed technician who identifies a
warning tag situation is required by law to turn off your gas as a safety measure to protect the residents of your home or business.
Why have I received a warning tag?
Warning tags are issued on any appliance and piping system
that uses natural gas when a licensed gas technician has
identified a hazard issue. One reason for a warning tag to be
placed on a furnace is when a defective heat exchanger is
identified. A defective heat exchanger can be a hazard because
it can release carbon monoxide, an odourless an d colourless
gas that can cause serious health problems if undetected.
Carbon monoxide is harmful because it rapidly accumulates
in the blood, depleting the blood’s ability to carry oxygen*.
If carbon monoxide is leaking from a cracked heat exchanger,
there is a chance of it mixing with the air that is generated by
the furnace and pushed into your vents and throughout your
home. To prevent this, a red tag is applied to your furnace,
your local utility is notified and your natural gas is turned off.
Two types of warning tags: Type A and Type B
There are two types of warning tags. If a licensed technician
has identified a carbon monoxide leak and deems it an immediate
danger, your furnace gets red tagged and your natural gas will
be turned off immediately. If the furnace does not pose an
immediate danger to the homeowner, a Type B warning tag will
be applied to the furnace and the local utility notified. A Type B
warning tag allows the customer 45 days to have the equipment
repaired or replaced. If corrective action is not taken, your natural
gas will be turned off by the local utility, Union or Enbridge.
What should I do if I receive a warning tag?
If you received a warning tag, you should immediately call a
licensed contractor to inspect your equipment. In some cases, a
furnace can repaired but in more serious cases, the equipment
often needs to be replaced. Dealing with natural gas, water and
electricity requires extreme care. Our experienced, licensed
technicians approach all jobs with safety as a priority. To discuss
a red tag, call Direct Energy at 1-866-803-4717.
18. - 17 - www.oapso.ca
Trevor De Cristofaro MLEO,
Canine Trainer
Animals on the Job: An MLEO’s Look at Animals
For the last 9 years I have
worked for the City of
Pickering, in the last 4 years
I have been a Municipal
Law Enforcement Officer.
Previously, Jason Litoborski
and I were the first two
Animal Services Officers
for the city as it took over
its own services. Both
arriving with different
animal backgrounds,
we quickly realized the
importance of educating
friends, coworkers and
the public on how animals
think, behave and how to
deal and work with their
natural behavior.
Coming out of college I was intrigued by working dogs, never
having had a dog growing up I decided to dig deeper into how
dogs, pets and police dogs were trained. I figured someone
had to know something, and I was determined to find out. So
through the typical fresh out of school security job, I found
Pando Stepanis who would later put me in touch with Dave
McMahon, two of the most knowledgeable trainers I have ever
met. I had found my calling. 20 years later, I have had the
pleasure of being a part of numerous training businesses, tons of
experiences and have had the tremendous fortune to educate
people about their pets.
Being with the City of Pickering and working with numerous
organizations, I have found that there is a real need to make
sure people understand how dogs think, why they behave
the way they do, and how to integrate them properly into
our daily lives. Since being in By Law Enforcement and going
through the OAPSO Training program, it is more than clear that
our coworkers in the industry put themselves at risk everyday
going to residences and dealing with local businesses. We have
found that even the local police rely on our By Law Officers
to help them with their animal issues. There is a need to help
our officers to be cross trained and have a good understanding
about animals and their potential danger.
Depending on where the officer works and what information
they have access to, it is important to know the area, any
history about that property, and if they are not sure, check with
local police or ACO. Every City and Municipality is different.
The benefit we have in Pickering is that we each know our areas
quite well, we communicate well with the residents and work
with Durham Regional Police. Although we don’t have access
to their calls, we always take precautions when dealing with
residents. It comes down to knowing how to deal with animals,
having the right equipment training and being prepared. We
all go through bite stick and OC spray certification yearly,
something our team is grateful for. I can honestly say that I have
never pulled my OC spray, and my bite stick is left secured until
such time as I feels there may be a safety concern.
So, what should we be looking for when attending a property
where we show no history of a dog at the home?
As officers we all know to “look for the signs”. Starting from
the curb up: animal waste or recycled food bags, tie out chains
or poop bags. I make it a point to look down the sides of the
house for open gates; if there is a dog we need to be prepared.
Of course when you knock on the door, the barking will usually
give it away.
There are things that we all need to remember, things that we
may become complacent with having pets of our own. Dogs
and cats, despite being a member of the family, are still
animals with instincts, and will generally protect themselves
at all costs. What animals are like with their family is almost
always not how they will respond with us; the uniform being a
foreign outfit what they see everyday, can often trigger negative
reactions. An added safety measure I often use, especially
during the warm weather seasons, is propping my foot against
the bottom of the door; no matter if it’s a single door or the
outer screen door. This type of maneuver can foil a dogs plan of
catching you off guard, remember even a Chihuahua can push a
door open if it wants to, and yes they bite to!
19. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 18 - www.oapso.ca
A dog’s temperament is made up of two parts, genetics and
environment. Whether you know it or not, as an officer, you have
dealt with both. For example, despite thinking you’ve preparing
the perfect environment for a shelter dog that seems quiet and
passive can turn, without it’s background from infancy, things
can go wrong; there may be something in the dogs genes like an
aggressive streak that has shown up and you were completely
unaware. The problem is, you cannot change or fix genetics. Also,
you can have the best bred dog and still have it go crazy, in which
case you may have to chalk it up to the environment it is in or
has been in previously. I have seen dogs come from some of the
best breeding stock; however sometimes the problems lay with
the humans who are trying to raise it; and vice versa, I have seen
dogs that come from “reputable breeders” and have some serious
issues as 10 week old puppies. In addition, it could just be the
wrong dog for the wrong family.
In our business of Municipal Law Enforcement, environment plays
a different role. We are dealing with a dogs’ natural instinct to
bark and protect its property and family. Does it mean it’s a bad
dog? Not at all, it’s doing its job. As officers, we need to keep that
in mind and be safe when we are approaching a property.
So what are some simple things for us to remember when
approaching a property? Always expect the unexpected, and
you can always justify protecting yourself against a dog coming
at you, whether it’s on the owners property or not. (Jumping on a
car hood works well)
Continue to look for those signs we mentioned above, food bags
or boxes, excrement, tie out chains, signs on fences, doors or in
windows. These animals are not like our personal pets! I’m sure
we can all relate to the statement made by the owner, “my dog is
fine, it won’t bite”, and then it takes a nip at your ankle, pant leg
or fingers. Be in the habit of always asking the owner to lock up
the dog or put it on a lead, if they refuse, don’t be afraid to advise
them you are leaving and next time you will be bringing support
ie. the police. Nine times out of ten, it gets their attention and
the dog will be put away for you to conduct your inspection or
investigation. Strange how that happens……..
I believe that as Municipal Law Enforcement Officers it is quite
simple, our safety means everything! We never want our spouse
or family getting the call to come to the hospital because we
have been hurt in any way. If you end up encountering a dog, it’s
not just us it effects, but the family who owns the animal as well.
We have all heard the saying “it wasn’t the dogs fault”. If we can
show that we did whatever it took for us, and the animal to be
safe, and something bad still happens, we can honestly feel we
did what we had to do to ensure everyone’s safety including the
dogs.
Look for more from Trevor at this years Annual Training Session in
Kingston.
FIND US ON THE WEB!
Questions or Concerns? Need to post a job opportunity?
Contact Kimberly Bimm at kim.bimm@kitchener.ca
20. - 19 - www.oapso.ca- 19 - www.oapso.ca
Roof collapse leads to evacuation
Published: 2015-03-05
Brighton Independent
By Joyce Cassin Original Article
One of the two buildings slated for demolition should the
Mac’s gas and convenience store pass the Ontario Municipal
Board hearing, is already suffering some severe issues.
The building at 21 Prince Edward Street recently suffered a
partial roof collapse which pushed out the top of the wall,
knocking veneer bricks to the ground, forcing the closure of a
portion of Prince Edward Street and the alley on the north side
of the building.
Matthew Brumsey, owner of the property, hired an engineer to
evaluate the damage.
John Guthrie of Guthrie Engineering Ltd., stated that owing to
the zero clearance between the two buildings, the failed roof
has caused movement toward, and pressure against 23 Prince
Edward Street. He recommended that the building be vacated
immediately.
The tenants upstairs at 23 Prince Edward did evacuate despite
the opinion that the collapsed roof has not caused any
movement or structural damage by engineering firm,
Davenport Associates hired by the owner of the building.
“In our professional opinion, the apartment and the retail
store located in 23 Prince Edward Street can continue to
be occupied without concern,” stated Murray J. Davenport
in his report. Owner Andrea Rae continues to operate her
business
Despite the conflicting reports, Brumsey says he’d prefer to
be safe and believe his engineer.
His concern is that if more snow, then melt occurs, more
damage could happen.
Until such time as Brumsey speaks with his insurance
company, he does not know whether the building would be
repaired or demolished.
Until a decision is made, the northbound lane of Prince
Edward Street will remain closed, as will the alley on the
north side.
Roof collapse
leads to
evacuation
The building at 21 Prince
Edward Street has suffered
some damage to the
centre portion of its roof.
The upstairs apartment
of the adjoining building
to the south has been
evacuated, while the
business downstairs
continues to operate.
21. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 20 - www.oapso.ca
Legal Corner Details on Property Standards Orders
By Shayne Turner
With Ted Allen enjoying his well-earned
retirement, I was asked if I could provide some
comments for this section of the newsletter,
relying on relevant case law, new or older.
Thus, I thought it may be helpful to undertake
a brief review of an older case that still has
significance to all PSO’s (and will for years
to come). As it turns out, the subject of
the case from 2000 was discussed again in
2012 in another court jurisdiction.
In Jimeil Holdings Inc. (2000), this
company appealed an order issued
by the City of Toronto relating to
a concrete retaining wall on land
owned by them. The order was
upheld by the City’s property
standards committee, resulting in
Jimeil appealing the committee’s
decision to the Superior Court
of Justice. In the section
of the Order outlining the
required repairs, the order
stated “please also submit
to the department a
professional engineer’s
report on the structural
integrity of the retaining
wall”. The court found
that this statement did
not fully comply with the
requirements of section 15.2(2)
of the BCA, which requires
that an order give reasonable
particulars of the repairs to
be made, as the statement
did not provide the property
owner with a reasonable
understanding of what work
he needed to undertake. The
court determined that, although
the order was deficient, it was
not fatal. Section 15.3(6) gives the
Judge the same powers of the
Committee, in section 15.3(3.1), in
that the order can be modified.
Thus, the order was modified, in that either the
City undertake a further study of the wall in order
to provide particulars to Jimeil or the 2 parties
undertake a joint investigation and discussion to
arrive at an appropriate description of the required
repairs.
Years later, in 2012, another case came to my
attention that relates to this same subject matter.
Although Boulevard Real Estate Equities Ltd. V.
Regina (City) is a case from Alberta, the principles
discussed can apply to PS orders issued in Ontario.
The legislated process is similar in that orders
must provide a description of the deficiency and
what repairs are required, and an appeal process is
provided for.
This case relates to 2 orders issued by the City to the
property owner, regarding 2 separate properties. One
of the items on each of the subject orders stated
“repair or replace the damaged or missing window(s)
panes, sash and hardware in the entire building
complete with screen(s) and storm window(s) where
required”. The property owner argued, and the court
agreed, that these requirements were too vague and
uncertain as to answer “what is required to comply
with the City’s Maintenance By-law”. These items in
the orders were quashed.
In summary, it is important for PSO’s to understand
the legislative obligation to provide a property owner
with a reasonable understanding of what the problem
is and what is required to ensure compliance with the
standards contained in the municipal by-law. Some
will argue, with good reason, that PSO’s must also be
careful not to be so specific that the order limits the
property owner’s options to undertake repairs and
gain compliance.
Like so much of what we do, our approach must be
balanced and reasonable.
Shayne Turner
Director of By-law Enforcement
City of Kitchener
shayne.turner@kitchener.ca
22. - 21 - www.oapso.ca
The Importance of Your Membership
Teamwork is celebrated in all occupations,
but professional workers, such as Property
Standards Officers, maintain a unique
relationship with their colleagues that can
be difficult to maintain – or even establish.
Each year, hundreds of members from
several OAPSO chapters from small and large
municipalities in Ontario convene at the Annual Conference and
Annual General Meeting to learn, network, promote each other’s
performance, and develop the overall health of their field through
a series of exciting training seminars. These people are members
of the Ontario Association of Property Standards Officers, Inc.
and are the forerunners of one of the most important areas of
the municipal and provincial government. They are one of many
professional organizations found across Canada.
Such professional organizations can be found across all applicable
occupations and can provide newcomers a place to start and learn
ways to leap across milestones without missing vital points. They
give seasoned professionals the tools to stay current in their line
of work, and they allow all members to connect with one another
and further the potential of themselves and their employers –
meaning more recognition. Established in 1975, OAPSO can be
considered a perfect example of such an organization as it holds a
rich history and strives to meet its member’s goals. OAPSO focuses
on the betterment of their members and anyone whose lives these
members impact.
Beginning and maintaining your membership with a professional
organization like OAPSO is not only important; it comes with
countless benefits to reap as well. These organizations are a
prime place to network with similar individuals. Conferences
are regularly held to bring members together, share knowledge,
and discuss pertinent issues. Most importantly, they also
give members a chance to learn more about their field of
work and continue their education through certification
programs. Other bonuses to membership will often include:
personal and professional development resources, discounts
on related products and services, and access to engaging
member publications. Membership also opens the opportunity
to take part in any exciting endeavours that may arise in the
organization – such as those taking place this year
with OAPSO.
“We are looking into creating a by-law consultancy to assist
smaller municipalities with the creation and/or review of
Property Standards type by-laws and/or Operating procedures,”
OAPSO President, Warwick R. Perrin says on the organization’s
website, www.oapso.ca, “This would be a tremendous help to
smaller municipalities and will provide members, especially
retired members, with an opportunity to stay involved with an
advantage of being paid.”
In the end, one should not look at membership to be a lifelong
responsibility but a continuous opportunity. With a constantly-
changing world, it is great to have the chance to stay current.
Being a member of a professional organization opens up many
doors and can truly enlighten your life – so why not begin or
renew a membership with one today?
Written by Christopher Kunkel
23. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 22 - www.oapso.ca
2015 OAPSO MEMBERSHIP APPLICATION
2015
OAPSO
MEMBERSHIP
APPLICATION
MEMBERSHIP
TYPE:
Individual
-‐
Municipality-‐______________________________________
Full
Membership
-‐
$70.00
Individual
Member
(1
vote)
Associate
-‐
Associate
Membership
-‐
$27.00
Individual
Member
(no
vote)
Venerable
-‐
Venerable
Membership-‐
$27.00
Individual
Member
(1
vote)
MAIN
CONTACT
PERSON:
(example
-‐
Manager
of
Property
Standards
and/or
Bylaws)
Last
First
Initial
EMAIL
JOB
TITLE:
MAILING
ADDRESS:
BUSINESS
PHONE
FAX#
Please
note
that
voting
at
the
Annual
General
Meeting
is
restricted
to
paid
members
only.
Please
return
this
form
and
the
staff
list
with
your
payment,
made
payable
to
–
Ontario
Association
of
Property
Standards
Officers
Inc.
C/O
Shelly
Kunkel
CBCO,
C.P.S.O
Director
-‐
Membership
and
Certification
Chair
100
Wellington
Square
Brantford,
Ontario
N3T
2M2
(519)
759-‐4150
Ext.
2315
Fax:
(519)
752-‐1874
Email:
skunkel@brantford.ca
Corporate-‐Municipality
Name:
• Population:_______________________
Fees
are
listed
in
the
chart
below
on
population
POPULATION
ANNUAL
FEE
VOTING
DELEGATES
Less
than
15,
000
$70.00
1
vote
15,
001
to
50,
000
$130.00
2
votes
Over
50,
000
population
$130.00
plus
$70.00
for
ever
50,
000
in
population
(or
portion
thereof)
1
vote
for
every
50,
000
population
(or
portion
thereof)
VERY
IMPORTANT:
In
order
to
ensure
the
accuracy
of
our
records
for
Membership
Cards,
please
provide
an
updated
listed
of
ALL
individuals
in
your
municipality
who
are
involved
in
property
standards
enforcement
and
wish
to
be
included
in
the
corporate
membership,
as
well
as
their
positions
within
the
municipality
and
their
email
address.
• Number
of
Members
for
this
Corporate
Membership:___________________
24. - 23 - www.oapso.ca
Property Standards: Appeal Committee Training
OAPSO continues to deliver its Property Standards Appeal Committee
training program to committee members and Committee support staff.
The Program is half-day in length and the cost is $51/attendee.
Please be aware that we need a minimum of 10 registrants. For smaller
municipalities, please contact neighbouring municipalities as well, to
conduct the session, so that we can capture as many Committee members
and staff as possible while holding the session in their particular area.
Registration can be arranged by contacting OAPSO Professional
Development Chair, Catherine Goddard
The course content will include;
• Enforcement
• The Bylaw
• The Property
Standards Order
• The Legislation (The
Building Code Act)
• The Committee
• The Hearing itself
• Appeals
• Case Law
Instructor Recruitment
OAPSO INSTRUCTOR RECRUITMENT NOTICE REMAINS POSTED
ON OUR WEBSITE - AT THE CERTIFICATION TRAINING TAB.
The need for construction instructors is the more urgent need for
oapso at this time - the search for candidates continues.
25. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 24 - www.oapso.ca
Application for
Certified Property Standards Officer CPSO
Certification is available to any Full Member or Corporate Member in good standing with the Ontario Association of Property
Standards Officers (OAPSO) who meets the qualifications. Full details of the qualification for the CPSO Certification please see
the website www.OAPSO.ca
APPLICATION
FOR
CERTIFIED
PROPERTY
STANDARDS
OFFICER
CPSO
Certification
is
available
to
any
Full
Member
or
Corporate
Member
in
good
standing
with
the
Ontario
Association
of
Property
Standards
Officers
(OAPSO)
who
meets
the
qualifications.
Full
details
of
the
qualification
for
the
CPSO
Certification
please
see
the
website
www.OAPSO.ca
Application
Check
List
1. Start
date
in
Property
Standards
_____________
(must
have
2
years’
experience)
Letter
from
your
supervisor,
HR
department
or
Municipal
Clerk
outlining
your
duties
as
a
Property
Standards
Officer
OR
in
the
field
of
Property
Standards
either
in
enforcement,
management
or
administration.
2. Completed
the
Training
or
Challenge
Exam
Successfully
completed
the
multi-‐stage
O.A.P.S.O.
training
courses
Copies
of
all
certificates
or
letters
indicating
successful
completion
are
attached.
Part
1:
(year
completed)____________
Part
2:
(year
completed)____________
Part
3(year
completed)____________
OR
Successfully
completed
a
Challenge
Exam
administered
by
OAPSO
Date
of
Exam:
(year
completed)____________
Name
of
Proctor:
________________________
Copy
of
the
O.A.P.S.O.
certificate
indicating
that
you
successfully
passed
the
challenge
exam.
3. Your
OAPSO
Corporate
or
Individual
Membership
is
in
good
standing
Y
/
N
(please
circle)
4. Mail
completed
application
form,
the
one-‐time
application
fee
of
$120.00
Made
payable
to
Ontario
Association
of
Property
Standards
Officers
(OAPSO)
C/O
Shelly
Kunkel
CBCO,
C.P.S.O
Director
-‐
Membership
and
Certification
Chair
City
of
Brantford,
100
Wellington
Square,
Brantford,
ON
N3T
2M2
Full
payment
and
all
relevant
documentation
must
accompany
this
application
NAME:
EMAIL:
TITLE:
MUNICIPALITY/EMPLOYER:
MAILING
ADDRESS:
(PLEASE
PROVIDE
A
COURIER
FRIENDLY
ADDRESS)
CITY:
PROVINCE:
POSTAL
CODE:
TELEPHONE
NUMBER:
FAX:
EMAIL:
Signature:
Date:
26. - 25 - www.oapso.ca
OAPSO VOTING PROCEDURES
Schedule EE provides a clear understanding of the requirements for the membership regarding voting
procedures.
A copy of the relevant Schedule is attached below. Please remember it is the responsibility of each member
to ensure that they are listed as a member in good standing in order to fully participate in the business of the
Association.
Len Creamer, CPSO Director By-laws and Resolutions Chair
SCHEDULE “EE” BALLOT VOTING
PURSUANT TO ARTICE 6.03, No municipality or other corporation having paid a corporate rate shall be entitled to carry more than
the prescribed number of votes as indicated below:
POPULATION VOTES
Less than 15,000 1
15,001 to 50,000 2
Over 50,000 2 plus
1 for every 50,000 in population,
or portion thereof
in excess of the first 50,000
1. A Full Individual Member shall be allotted a single vote.
2. Voting privileges for full members whose municipality
or other corporation has paid a corporate rate for
membership shall have their total number of votes
apportioned according to the above schedule.
3. Municipal and non-Municipal corporations or
unincorporated associations which have paid a rate as
set out in this by-law shall designate, in writing, the names
of the persons who will represent the corporation or
association, at all meetings of the membership. Only
those designated persons are eligible to participate
in the business affairs of the Association.
4. Pursuant to section 2.01, Associate and Honourary
members shall not have a vote in the affairs of the
Association. It shall be the responsibility of each
municipality or other corporation which has paid a
corporate rate to designate those persons in their e
mploy who are Full, Associate and Honourary members.
5. A Life Member shall be allotted a single vote.
6. A Venerable Member shall be allotted a single vote.
7. A Member of the Board of Directors shall be allotted a single
vote. If the Director’s membership was paid at a corporate
rate, then the Director’s vote shall be separate and distinct
from the total votes allocated to that municipality.
8. A member must be present in order to vote on any matter.
Absentee or proxy ballots are not permitted.
9. Corporate members in excess of the allotted number
permitted, may participate in the business of the Association
but have no vote.
10. The Membership Chair shall determine the eligibility of
any member wishing to stand for election to the Board
of Directors or nominate another member for election by
no later than 24 hours prior to the commencement of the
Annual General Meeting.
11. Only Members in Good Standing shall be eligible to nominate
a member for election to the Board of Directors.
12. Only Members in Good Standing may be nominated for
election to the Board of Directors.
13. Any Candidate or their nominators found to be Not In Good
Standing shall be disqualified from consideration for election
or nomination.
14. 24 hours prior to the commencement of the Annual General
Meeting the Membership Register shall be deemed closed
and no further changes shall be made to it until after the
close of the Annual General Meeting.
27. The Property Standard
SPRING/SUMMER 2015
- 26 - www.oapso.ca
NOTICE OF MOTION TO AMEND BY-LAW 1-2012
At its January meeting the Board of Directors voted to bring forward some changes to the governing by-law of the Association.
At that time it was also suggested that we, as an Association should look back and honour certain of our past members. Any
change to the body of the By-law must be ratified by the membership at the next Annual General Meeting.
The following is a brief overview of the proposed changes.
MEMBERSHIP
Full membership in the Association whether achieved through membership payment as an individual or through a corporate
membership is reserved for those who actually carry out the duties of a Property Standards Officer pursuant to the Ontario
Building Code Act, on an ongoing or routine basis.
The nature of the service given by a member will determine their possible inclusion as an Honourable or Life Member. Life status
suggests that the member may continue to contribute in some manner. Honourary status implies that they are acknowledged to
their outstanding efforts.
MEMBERSHIP AND PARTICIPATION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Circumstances this past year have caused the Board to examine more closely the qualifications for membership on the Board. As
noted elsewhere in the By-law only a Full, Life or Venerable member is qualified to run for, and serve on the Board of Directors.
In order to clear up possible ambiguities or misinterpretations sections 7.12 and 7.13 have be redrafted and are more precisely
articulated. A job absence due to a temporary reassignment of duties shall not disqualify a member from gaining or maintaining a
seat on the Board.
GENERAL HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS
In recognition of the importance to maintaining an up-to-date and accurate record of the Association’s governing by-law the By-
laws and Resolutions Committee will be moved from an ad hoc committee to full Standing Committee status.
A more fulsome explanation of the duties of this Committee are included in sections 16, 17 and 18 of Schedule CC.
SCHEDULE “FF”
Any addition of new Life members requires a ⅔ ratification vote of the membership at that year’s Annual General Meeting. This
year, the Board is recommending the addition of three worthy candidates to the list of Life Members.
Frank Weinstock is a former Board member, former Chairman of the Education Committee and a past president of the Association.
David Sala served for over ten years as a Part 3 Investigations instructor specializing in Search Warrants.
Ronald Bourett, although never a member of the Board, Ron had been a strong advocate for the Association in the north-west
of the Province. From his position in Thunder Bay, Ron has organized training sessions and served as Chair of the North-Western
Region Chapter.
This year we add two names of members who will be sorely missed by all. Ron Charlebois and Bill Smith served the Board and the
Association with distinction, dedication and hard work. Both men helped to make the Association a better organization.
Sadly these members both lost a hard fought battle with cancer. Their efforts and contribution cannot go unrecognized, therefore
the Board are submitting their names as the first two members to be presented the posthumous award of Honourary Membership.
Len Creamer, BA, CPSO, MLEO(C), CMMIII
CHAIR, By-laws and Resolutions
28. The Property Standard is the Newsletter and official voice of the Ontario Association of Property Standards Officers Inc. The opinions expressed in this, and any past or future publications are those of
the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Board of Directors or other members of the Ontario Association of Property Standards Officers. Any advertising in the Newsletter does not
constitute an endorsement by O.A.P.S.O., the editor, or the Board of Directors. Anyone wishing to respond to any article or view expressed in this publication is requested to so in writing to the editor or
the association mail box No ar ticle or portion there of in this publication may be reproduced for any reason whatsoever without the express permission of the editor.
Property Standard Editor: Kristen Bickers - ckbickers@hotmail.com
The Property Standard
spring 2015
www.oapso.ca
2015 Board of Directors (from left to right):
From left to right: Catherine Goddard, Craig Calder, Garry Anderson, Shelly Kunkel,
Matt Richardson, Warwick Perrin, Len Creamer, Kimberly Bimm, Italo Joe Luzi,
Kristen Bickers, John Lane and Rudy Puyo
2015 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Warwick Perrin President
wperrin@toronto.ca
Garry Anderson Immediate Past President
ganderson@brantford.ca
Craig Calder Vice President
craig.calder@ottawa.ca
John Lane Treasurer
jlane@hamilton.ca
Grace Wilson Secretary
gracew@brantford.ca
Kristen Bickers Newsletter
ckbickers@hotmail.com
Kimberly Bimm Website
kim.bimm@kitchener.ca
Len Creamer Resolutions and By-laws/OAPSO Rep
lcreamer@clarington.net
Yvonne Van Hoek Legislation
yvonne.vanhoek@mississauga.ca
Catherine Goddard Professional Development/
Regional Conference
catherine.goddard@brampton.ca
Italo Joe Luzi Certificate Training/Ministry Liaison
jluzi@toronto.ca
Shelly Kunkel Membership/Certification
skunkel@brantford.ca
2015 ADVERTISING
To place an advertisement in our Newsletter “The Property
Standard”, please contact the Editor with your request:
Kristen Bickers - ckbickers@hotmail.com
Full Colour Ads 1 issue 2 issueS (or more)
Full Page $500 $375
1/2 Page $300 $225
1/4 Page $175 $135
1/8 Page $125 $ 95
The “Property Standard” newsletter is published and made available as a
PDF directly to over 1800 members and non members across Ontario, and
includes a variety of Provincial and Regional level government employees.
Striving to provide a better place to live
