SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
KMEC
Mission to Saturn
ASTE 330 FALL 2016
Keyla Kolenovic, Melissa Dalton, Ethan Geipel, Christopher McDonough
Overall Mission Abstract
KMEC Description: The spacecraft, as pictured in Figure 1, has a octagonal cross section with a
distance of 1 m from edge to edge and a wall thickness of 0.004 m. The spacecraft is 6 ​m​ tall and
is comprised of two spacecraft that will separate upon entry to their orbit around Saturn. The
spacecraft will be made out of Aluminum, and the distribution of instruments within the frame is
shown below.
Figure 1: sketch of KMEC spacecraft. Fully assembled spacecraft
before payload deployment is on the left, the internal components of the payload
viewable in the center, and the cross sectional view of the spacecraft is on the right.
Level 1 Mission Requirements: This mission will dedicate 100 kg of payload to science, be
capable of transmitting 100 kpbs, use a chemical propulsion system, and have a backup battery
that will be capable of powering all subsystems for at least 24 hours. The 100 kg of payload
contains instruments that complete the following science objectives: cosmic dust analysis,
ultraviolet spectrometry imaging, and continuous space recognition between the main spacecraft
and deployed payload.
Table 1: Mass and Power Budget
Mass kg][ Power W][
Propulsion 2690 0
Power 26.5 n/a
Telecom 30 15
Structure 210 0
ADCS 89.34 35
Payload 54.36 66.38
Thermal 22 0
C&DH 6 5
Total* 3128 kg 121.38 W
Mission Design
Mission: 5 year mission to Saturn by Earth-Saturn Hohmann Transfer, with the goal of
completing cosmic dust analysis, ultraviolet spectrometry imaging, and continuous space
recognition between the spacecraft and deployed payload. The trip time to destination is 6.01
years, and 2 years into its 5 year mission the KMEC will complete an inclination change to
, from an initial inclination of . calculations for the Hohmann7.485°i = 1 .485°i = 2 VΔ
Transfer can be viewed in the attached documents and Δ​V for the plane change is detailed below.
The Delta V launch vehicle is used for the first burn of the Hohmann transfer and the second
burn is provided by the spacecraft’s chemical propulsion system. The propellant budget for the
mission is , the calculation for which can also be seen in the attached documents., 90 kgMp = 2 6
Information regarding the thermal heat environment can be found in the Thermal Subsystem
section.
Propellant Budget: , 90 kgMp = 2 6
Max distance from Sun: 1,430,000,000 km
Max distance from Earth: 1,586,000,000 km
V plane change 4.29 km/s) in(15/2) .12 km/sΔ = 2 * ( * s = 1
Chemical Propulsion System
Type of Thruster / Propellant: LOX/Kerosene
Nozzle exit diameter: 0.5 m
Nozzle exit area: 0.1963 m​2
Nozzle throat area: 0.0215 m​2
Mach number: 3.27
To: 3545 K
Po: 7.60E+06 Pa
Pe: 101325 Pa
Ae/A*: 9.13
Fthrust = 75991 N
Isp = 291.3 s
Propellant mass for ACDS: 63.45 kg
Propellant mass for cruise/maneuvering: 2626.55 kg
Main engine burn time: 2626.55 kg)/(19.63 kg/s) 133 seconds( =
Calculations for above values are detailed in attached documents.
ADCS
The Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem consists of two Star Trackers, two
Sun Trackers, as well as two Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to determine roll pitch and yaw.
Two of each component are used for redundancy. If any one fails, the mission can continue
without a major hindrance. Further, the Star Trackers allow for positions that fits our requirement
for 0.1 degree pointing accuracy.
As you can see from ADCS table attached, disturbance torques are very small. Therefore,
the disturbance torques can be mitigated using reaction wheels that were sized off a 1.5 Factor of
Safety with regards to the disturbance torques.
The spacecraft is also designed to slew once every two days for telecommunications back
to Earth. Beyond this slewing, the spacecraft will rotate once per period in order to insure that it,
the spacecraft, remains pointed toward Saturn.
If either the thrusters or reactions wheels fail, they can be compensated with using the
other system.
C&DH
KMEC was identified to be on the higher end of a typical complexity mission, which
guided our estimates for the mass, power, and size of the C&DH subsystem. These estimates are
given below:
Mass Power Volume
6 kg 15 W 0.0085 m^3
Additionally, a C&DH flowchart was identified that is similar to the C&DH system that our
spacecraft would be based on:
This flowchart includes an IR camera as well as housekeeping data flow, which would be very
similar to the Ultraviolet Imaging System included on our spacecraft.
Power Subsystem
The power subsystem used for KMEC is a Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric
Generator (MMRTG) of mass ​m = 4.06 kg with a fuel Pu-238. This was chosen as the primary
power source because it is, in part, modeled after the Cassini mission, wherein 3 RTG’s were
used. In addition, solar arrays would not have been a feasible option in terms of economy and
mass, as very little solar energy would be generated at such a large distance from the sun.
Thermal power generated from the MMRTG, as well as the resulting electrical power
conversion, can be seen in Table 2. This was calculated using the parameters for Pu-238 fuel
found in Table 3.
Table 2: MMRTG Sizing for Operation
Thermal (​W) Electrical (​W)
P,BOL 2,295.86 126.27
P,EOL 2,206.9 121.38
Table 3: Properties of Pu-238 MMRTG
As a backup power source, a LiSO2 battery was sized to provide power to all subsystems
for at least 24 hours. The size of the battery was determined to be ​ m = 26.5 kg. There are no
solar arrays on KMEC, as due to Saturn’s distance from the sun, the little amount of solar energy
that could be produced by reasonably sized solar arrays wouldn’t merit their use, given the space,
mass, and cost of them.
Thermal Subsystem
The Thermal Subsystems is largely aided by the RTG. During the cold phase, the RTG
provides sufficient heat to keep our spacecraft within the operating temperatures of our
components.
During the hot phase, the RTG heat combined with the solar heat would warm our
spacecraft beyond our operational temperatures. Therefore, a radiator was installed with an area
of 1.420 square meters.
Table 4: Components of at Saturnqext
Hot ( )/mW 2 Cold ( )/mW 2
qsolar 16.92 0
qalbedo 4.7 4.7
qIR 5.79 5.79
Primary Structure Subsystem Design
Figure 1: ​Cross Section of KMEC including dimensions and location of Neutral Axis.
To size the structure thickness, the octagonal frame was approximated to be a cylinder.
The structure material was chosen to be Aluminum because it behaves predictably and has many
material properties that make it ideal for use in spacecraft design. The material properties for
Aluminum 7075-T73, and the factors of safety, for aluminum are included below.
Using these values for ultimate and yield stress, the minimum radius required in order to not
exceed the yield stress was calculated using the following equation:
The inner radius was calculated to be, at a minimum, 0.4989 m.
Next, the resonant frequency of the spacecraft was calculated to make sure that the
resonant frequency is greater than that of the Atlas V launch vehicle. The Atlas V has an axial
frequency of 15 Hz, and a lateral frequency of 8 Hz. The resonant frequencies were calculated
using the following equations:
The frequencies were calculated to be 30 Hz in the axial direction, and 6 Hz in the lateral
direction. Because the resonant frequency of our spacecraft was lower than the 8 Hz minimum,
the inner radius was resized using the following equation:
The axial frequency was then recalculated using the new inner radius of 0.496 m, and the new
axial frequency was calculated to be 54 Hz, which still is above the allowable frequency.
The buckling stress was then calculated using a wall thickness of 0.004 m, using the
following equations:
The buckling stress is much greater than any loads our spacecraft so it does not have to be
resized.
Finally, the mass of the structure was calculated as the following:
Payload Subsystem
The scientific payload for the KMEC mission had a limiting size of 100 kg. Our mission
focussed on obtaining data about the gravitational field, ultraviolet emissions, and cosmic dust in
the ring structure. The scientific instruments used were based on instruments from three unique
missions (GRACE, Juno, and Cassini).
The first instrument chosen was the K Band Ranging system (KBR) which was based on
the GRACE mission around Earth. This instrument tracks the distance between the two
spacecraft and uses fluctuations in that distance to map the gravitational field around the planet.
This would be the first attempt at using a KBR to map the gravitational field of a non-Earth
planet.
The second instrument is the Ultraviolet Imaging System (UVS) which was based on the
Juno mission around Jupiter. The focus of this mission was to obtain images and data regarding
the ultraviolet emissions of the planet, specifically near the aurora’s at the poles.
The third instrument is the Cosmic Dust Analyzer (DSA), which was based on the
Cassini mission around Saturn. This instrument detects and analyzes incredibly small particles
that pass through it, and then uses that information to shed light on the structure of the ring
systems around Saturn. Taking a CDA on this mission could allow for previously unknown ring
structures to be identified.
The breakdown for mass, power, volume, and data rates is given in the following table:
The total mass of the scientific payload is 76 kg, which is less than the restraint of 100 kg. The
data rate is 333 kbps, which will influence the antenna sizing calculations.
The positioning of scientific instruments inside the spacecraft is identified as shown
below:
The positioning of the instruments inside the spacecraft was modeled based on the GRACE
spacecraft, which utilized a semi-hexagonal frame, which was similar to our octagonal frame.
The CDA needed to be facing in the ram direction in order to collect its data, and the KBR has to
be pointed at the other spacecraft in order to collect its data correctly. The UVS has to be pointed
down towards Saturn at all times, which dictated its location in the spacecraft.
Telecommunications Subsystem
For telecommunication, our spacecraft will utilize the Deep Space Network (DSN), and
will communicate back to Earth using a 1 m diameter Cassegrain antenna. The typical efficiency
for this type of antenna is around 60%, and our spacecraft will use a transmitter power of 20 W.
For deep space communication, an X band signal was used (specifically 10 GHz), in order to
attain a tractable gain for the antenna while also maintaining an achievable pointing accuracy.
The payload data rate of 333 kbps and housekeeping data rate of 50 kbps, which brings
the maximum total data rate to 383 kbps, which is the value used to calculate the signal to noise
ratio. The signal to noise ratio was then calculated using the following equation:
The signal to noise ratio for our spacecraft was calculated to be 5 dB, which is very good
considering the maximum distance between our spacecraft and Earth (1,586,000,000 km).
Space Environment
Because Saturn is far from the Sun, solar radiation is not a large concern for the
spacecraft. Radiation given off by Saturn as well as the multimeroids that orbit the planet are a
concern, however. Orbiting at 2 million kilometers from Saturn’s surface, KMEC avoids the
harshest of Saturn’s radiation belt and multimeteroids. Nonetheless, KMEC was outfitted with a
half centimeter thick radiation shield made out of aluminum. Further copper shielding is added to
the instruments for extra radiation protection.
Our estimation for total radiation dose is 9000 rads, although this is likely to be higher
because it was modeled off of Earth’s radiation field which is weaker than Saturn’s.
Further Reading
https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/main/index.html
http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grace/
http://spaceflight101.com/juno/spacecraft-information/
https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/g/grace
http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grace/
http://www.engineersedge.com/calculators/section_square_case_18.htm
https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/g/grail
https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/cosmic-dust-analyzer/
http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/Juno_DESCANSO_Post121106H--Compact.pdf

More Related Content

What's hot

Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.Sung (Stephen) Kim
 
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17Antonios Arkas
 
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraft
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraftOptimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraft
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraftKristopherKerames
 
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021Dora Musielak, Ph.D.
 
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019Dora Musielak, Ph.D.
 
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghi
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghiAROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghi
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghiStefano Coltellacci
 
Centurion - OTV Presentation
Centurion - OTV PresentationCenturion - OTV Presentation
Centurion - OTV PresentationJay Mulakala
 
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5Antonios Arkas
 
Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...
  Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...  Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...
Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...Belinda Marchand
 
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error Vedant Srivastava
 
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20Stefano Coltellacci
 
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Sung (Stephen) Kim
 
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008Antonios Arkas
 
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7Antonios Arkas
 
Satellite Final.pptx
Satellite Final.pptxSatellite Final.pptx
Satellite Final.pptxAndrew Bothun
 

What's hot (20)

Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Mission Concept Paper for Project A.D.I.O.S.
 
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17
LEO OR.A.SI Presentation Version No.17
 
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraft
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraftOptimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraft
Optimal trajectory to Saturn in ion-thruster powered spacecraft
 
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021
Spacecraft orbits for exoplanets discovery lecture dr dora musielak 11 june 2021
 
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019
Orbit design for exoplanet discovery spacecraft dr dora musielak 1 april 2019
 
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghi
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghiAROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghi
AROSAT_updated-spacesegment_presentation_NO_loghi
 
Xray interferometry
Xray interferometryXray interferometry
Xray interferometry
 
Orbital Debris Mapping
Orbital Debris MappingOrbital Debris Mapping
Orbital Debris Mapping
 
Chandrayaan 2 modules
Chandrayaan 2 modulesChandrayaan 2 modules
Chandrayaan 2 modules
 
Centurion - OTV Presentation
Centurion - OTV PresentationCenturion - OTV Presentation
Centurion - OTV Presentation
 
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part I Version 5
 
SatellitePaper.docx
SatellitePaper.docxSatellitePaper.docx
SatellitePaper.docx
 
Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...
  Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...  Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...
Investigation Of Alternative Return Strategies for Orion Trans-Earth Inject...
 
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error
Relativistic Effect in GPS Satellite and Computation of Time Error
 
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
MAGIA satellite. Experimental Astronomy (8 December 2010), pp. 1-20
 
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
Final Presentation for Project A.D.I.O.S.
 
Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99Zubrin nov99
Zubrin nov99
 
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008
Presentation for the 16th EUROSTAR Users Conference June 2008
 
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7
Flight Dynamics Software Presentation Part II Version 7
 
Satellite Final.pptx
Satellite Final.pptxSatellite Final.pptx
Satellite Final.pptx
 

Similar to ProjectReport

S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment Analysis
S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment AnalysisS/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment Analysis
S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment AnalysisPau Molas Roca
 
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxy
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxyA kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxy
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxySérgio Sacani
 
Team ESAT Preliminary Design Review
Team ESAT Preliminary Design ReviewTeam ESAT Preliminary Design Review
Team ESAT Preliminary Design Reviewmarc_cattrell
 
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...IRJET Journal
 
Realistic interstellarexplorer
Realistic interstellarexplorerRealistic interstellarexplorer
Realistic interstellarexplorerClifford Stone
 
ASTRAEUS Final Report
ASTRAEUS Final ReportASTRAEUS Final Report
ASTRAEUS Final ReportDavid Torre
 
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect Thrusters
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect ThrustersThe SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect Thrusters
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect ThrustersSérgio Sacani
 
Deep Impact Poster Revised
Deep Impact Poster RevisedDeep Impact Poster Revised
Deep Impact Poster RevisedAlejandro Cota
 
report of power transmission via sps-1
report of power transmission via sps-1report of power transmission via sps-1
report of power transmission via sps-1Doddoji Adharvana
 
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3Stefano Coltellacci
 
satellite communication (1).pdf
satellite communication (1).pdfsatellite communication (1).pdf
satellite communication (1).pdfbalaponnusamy3
 

Similar to ProjectReport (20)

TNO poster final
TNO poster finalTNO poster final
TNO poster final
 
S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment Analysis
S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment AnalysisS/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment Analysis
S/C in Heliosynchronous Orbit - Spacecraft Environment Analysis
 
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxy
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxyA kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxy
A kiloparsec scale_internal_shock_collision_in_the_jet_of_a_nearby_radio_galaxy
 
Team ESAT Preliminary Design Review
Team ESAT Preliminary Design ReviewTeam ESAT Preliminary Design Review
Team ESAT Preliminary Design Review
 
SWaRMM_Mission
SWaRMM_MissionSWaRMM_Mission
SWaRMM_Mission
 
Poster- QCS
Poster- QCSPoster- QCS
Poster- QCS
 
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...
Analysis and Design of a Propulsion System for an Interplanetary Mission to V...
 
Manuscript7
Manuscript7Manuscript7
Manuscript7
 
Realistic interstellarexplorer
Realistic interstellarexplorerRealistic interstellarexplorer
Realistic interstellarexplorer
 
ASTRAEUS Final Report
ASTRAEUS Final ReportASTRAEUS Final Report
ASTRAEUS Final Report
 
CHIPS 2015
CHIPS 2015CHIPS 2015
CHIPS 2015
 
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect Thrusters
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect ThrustersThe SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect Thrusters
The SpaceDrive Project - First Results on EMDrive and Mach-Effect Thrusters
 
B02708012
B02708012B02708012
B02708012
 
Deep Impact Poster Revised
Deep Impact Poster RevisedDeep Impact Poster Revised
Deep Impact Poster Revised
 
report of power transmission via sps-1
report of power transmission via sps-1report of power transmission via sps-1
report of power transmission via sps-1
 
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3
AROSAT Mission and Spacecraft Configuration_rev3
 
Dsbr
DsbrDsbr
Dsbr
 
satellite communication (1).pdf
satellite communication (1).pdfsatellite communication (1).pdf
satellite communication (1).pdf
 
Satellite Subsystems
Satellite SubsystemsSatellite Subsystems
Satellite Subsystems
 
8 (1)
8 (1)8 (1)
8 (1)
 

ProjectReport

  • 1. KMEC Mission to Saturn ASTE 330 FALL 2016 Keyla Kolenovic, Melissa Dalton, Ethan Geipel, Christopher McDonough
  • 2. Overall Mission Abstract KMEC Description: The spacecraft, as pictured in Figure 1, has a octagonal cross section with a distance of 1 m from edge to edge and a wall thickness of 0.004 m. The spacecraft is 6 ​m​ tall and is comprised of two spacecraft that will separate upon entry to their orbit around Saturn. The spacecraft will be made out of Aluminum, and the distribution of instruments within the frame is shown below. Figure 1: sketch of KMEC spacecraft. Fully assembled spacecraft before payload deployment is on the left, the internal components of the payload viewable in the center, and the cross sectional view of the spacecraft is on the right. Level 1 Mission Requirements: This mission will dedicate 100 kg of payload to science, be capable of transmitting 100 kpbs, use a chemical propulsion system, and have a backup battery that will be capable of powering all subsystems for at least 24 hours. The 100 kg of payload contains instruments that complete the following science objectives: cosmic dust analysis, ultraviolet spectrometry imaging, and continuous space recognition between the main spacecraft and deployed payload. Table 1: Mass and Power Budget Mass kg][ Power W][ Propulsion 2690 0 Power 26.5 n/a Telecom 30 15
  • 3. Structure 210 0 ADCS 89.34 35 Payload 54.36 66.38 Thermal 22 0 C&DH 6 5 Total* 3128 kg 121.38 W Mission Design Mission: 5 year mission to Saturn by Earth-Saturn Hohmann Transfer, with the goal of completing cosmic dust analysis, ultraviolet spectrometry imaging, and continuous space recognition between the spacecraft and deployed payload. The trip time to destination is 6.01 years, and 2 years into its 5 year mission the KMEC will complete an inclination change to , from an initial inclination of . calculations for the Hohmann7.485°i = 1 .485°i = 2 VΔ Transfer can be viewed in the attached documents and Δ​V for the plane change is detailed below. The Delta V launch vehicle is used for the first burn of the Hohmann transfer and the second burn is provided by the spacecraft’s chemical propulsion system. The propellant budget for the mission is , the calculation for which can also be seen in the attached documents., 90 kgMp = 2 6 Information regarding the thermal heat environment can be found in the Thermal Subsystem section. Propellant Budget: , 90 kgMp = 2 6 Max distance from Sun: 1,430,000,000 km Max distance from Earth: 1,586,000,000 km V plane change 4.29 km/s) in(15/2) .12 km/sΔ = 2 * ( * s = 1
  • 4. Chemical Propulsion System Type of Thruster / Propellant: LOX/Kerosene Nozzle exit diameter: 0.5 m Nozzle exit area: 0.1963 m​2 Nozzle throat area: 0.0215 m​2 Mach number: 3.27 To: 3545 K Po: 7.60E+06 Pa Pe: 101325 Pa Ae/A*: 9.13 Fthrust = 75991 N Isp = 291.3 s Propellant mass for ACDS: 63.45 kg Propellant mass for cruise/maneuvering: 2626.55 kg Main engine burn time: 2626.55 kg)/(19.63 kg/s) 133 seconds( = Calculations for above values are detailed in attached documents. ADCS The Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem consists of two Star Trackers, two Sun Trackers, as well as two Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) to determine roll pitch and yaw. Two of each component are used for redundancy. If any one fails, the mission can continue without a major hindrance. Further, the Star Trackers allow for positions that fits our requirement for 0.1 degree pointing accuracy. As you can see from ADCS table attached, disturbance torques are very small. Therefore, the disturbance torques can be mitigated using reaction wheels that were sized off a 1.5 Factor of Safety with regards to the disturbance torques. The spacecraft is also designed to slew once every two days for telecommunications back to Earth. Beyond this slewing, the spacecraft will rotate once per period in order to insure that it, the spacecraft, remains pointed toward Saturn. If either the thrusters or reactions wheels fail, they can be compensated with using the other system.
  • 5. C&DH KMEC was identified to be on the higher end of a typical complexity mission, which guided our estimates for the mass, power, and size of the C&DH subsystem. These estimates are given below: Mass Power Volume 6 kg 15 W 0.0085 m^3 Additionally, a C&DH flowchart was identified that is similar to the C&DH system that our spacecraft would be based on: This flowchart includes an IR camera as well as housekeeping data flow, which would be very similar to the Ultraviolet Imaging System included on our spacecraft. Power Subsystem The power subsystem used for KMEC is a Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) of mass ​m = 4.06 kg with a fuel Pu-238. This was chosen as the primary power source because it is, in part, modeled after the Cassini mission, wherein 3 RTG’s were used. In addition, solar arrays would not have been a feasible option in terms of economy and mass, as very little solar energy would be generated at such a large distance from the sun.
  • 6. Thermal power generated from the MMRTG, as well as the resulting electrical power conversion, can be seen in Table 2. This was calculated using the parameters for Pu-238 fuel found in Table 3. Table 2: MMRTG Sizing for Operation Thermal (​W) Electrical (​W) P,BOL 2,295.86 126.27 P,EOL 2,206.9 121.38 Table 3: Properties of Pu-238 MMRTG As a backup power source, a LiSO2 battery was sized to provide power to all subsystems for at least 24 hours. The size of the battery was determined to be ​ m = 26.5 kg. There are no solar arrays on KMEC, as due to Saturn’s distance from the sun, the little amount of solar energy that could be produced by reasonably sized solar arrays wouldn’t merit their use, given the space, mass, and cost of them. Thermal Subsystem The Thermal Subsystems is largely aided by the RTG. During the cold phase, the RTG provides sufficient heat to keep our spacecraft within the operating temperatures of our components. During the hot phase, the RTG heat combined with the solar heat would warm our spacecraft beyond our operational temperatures. Therefore, a radiator was installed with an area of 1.420 square meters.
  • 7. Table 4: Components of at Saturnqext Hot ( )/mW 2 Cold ( )/mW 2 qsolar 16.92 0 qalbedo 4.7 4.7 qIR 5.79 5.79 Primary Structure Subsystem Design Figure 1: ​Cross Section of KMEC including dimensions and location of Neutral Axis. To size the structure thickness, the octagonal frame was approximated to be a cylinder. The structure material was chosen to be Aluminum because it behaves predictably and has many material properties that make it ideal for use in spacecraft design. The material properties for Aluminum 7075-T73, and the factors of safety, for aluminum are included below. Using these values for ultimate and yield stress, the minimum radius required in order to not exceed the yield stress was calculated using the following equation:
  • 8. The inner radius was calculated to be, at a minimum, 0.4989 m. Next, the resonant frequency of the spacecraft was calculated to make sure that the resonant frequency is greater than that of the Atlas V launch vehicle. The Atlas V has an axial frequency of 15 Hz, and a lateral frequency of 8 Hz. The resonant frequencies were calculated using the following equations: The frequencies were calculated to be 30 Hz in the axial direction, and 6 Hz in the lateral direction. Because the resonant frequency of our spacecraft was lower than the 8 Hz minimum, the inner radius was resized using the following equation: The axial frequency was then recalculated using the new inner radius of 0.496 m, and the new axial frequency was calculated to be 54 Hz, which still is above the allowable frequency. The buckling stress was then calculated using a wall thickness of 0.004 m, using the following equations:
  • 9. The buckling stress is much greater than any loads our spacecraft so it does not have to be resized. Finally, the mass of the structure was calculated as the following: Payload Subsystem The scientific payload for the KMEC mission had a limiting size of 100 kg. Our mission focussed on obtaining data about the gravitational field, ultraviolet emissions, and cosmic dust in the ring structure. The scientific instruments used were based on instruments from three unique missions (GRACE, Juno, and Cassini). The first instrument chosen was the K Band Ranging system (KBR) which was based on the GRACE mission around Earth. This instrument tracks the distance between the two spacecraft and uses fluctuations in that distance to map the gravitational field around the planet. This would be the first attempt at using a KBR to map the gravitational field of a non-Earth planet. The second instrument is the Ultraviolet Imaging System (UVS) which was based on the Juno mission around Jupiter. The focus of this mission was to obtain images and data regarding the ultraviolet emissions of the planet, specifically near the aurora’s at the poles. The third instrument is the Cosmic Dust Analyzer (DSA), which was based on the Cassini mission around Saturn. This instrument detects and analyzes incredibly small particles that pass through it, and then uses that information to shed light on the structure of the ring systems around Saturn. Taking a CDA on this mission could allow for previously unknown ring structures to be identified. The breakdown for mass, power, volume, and data rates is given in the following table:
  • 10. The total mass of the scientific payload is 76 kg, which is less than the restraint of 100 kg. The data rate is 333 kbps, which will influence the antenna sizing calculations. The positioning of scientific instruments inside the spacecraft is identified as shown below: The positioning of the instruments inside the spacecraft was modeled based on the GRACE spacecraft, which utilized a semi-hexagonal frame, which was similar to our octagonal frame. The CDA needed to be facing in the ram direction in order to collect its data, and the KBR has to be pointed at the other spacecraft in order to collect its data correctly. The UVS has to be pointed down towards Saturn at all times, which dictated its location in the spacecraft. Telecommunications Subsystem For telecommunication, our spacecraft will utilize the Deep Space Network (DSN), and will communicate back to Earth using a 1 m diameter Cassegrain antenna. The typical efficiency for this type of antenna is around 60%, and our spacecraft will use a transmitter power of 20 W. For deep space communication, an X band signal was used (specifically 10 GHz), in order to attain a tractable gain for the antenna while also maintaining an achievable pointing accuracy. The payload data rate of 333 kbps and housekeeping data rate of 50 kbps, which brings the maximum total data rate to 383 kbps, which is the value used to calculate the signal to noise ratio. The signal to noise ratio was then calculated using the following equation: The signal to noise ratio for our spacecraft was calculated to be 5 dB, which is very good considering the maximum distance between our spacecraft and Earth (1,586,000,000 km).
  • 11. Space Environment Because Saturn is far from the Sun, solar radiation is not a large concern for the spacecraft. Radiation given off by Saturn as well as the multimeroids that orbit the planet are a concern, however. Orbiting at 2 million kilometers from Saturn’s surface, KMEC avoids the harshest of Saturn’s radiation belt and multimeteroids. Nonetheless, KMEC was outfitted with a half centimeter thick radiation shield made out of aluminum. Further copper shielding is added to the instruments for extra radiation protection. Our estimation for total radiation dose is 9000 rads, although this is likely to be higher because it was modeled off of Earth’s radiation field which is weaker than Saturn’s. Further Reading https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/ https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/juno/main/index.html http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grace/ http://spaceflight101.com/juno/spacecraft-information/ https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/g/grace http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/grace/ http://www.engineersedge.com/calculators/section_square_case_18.htm https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/g/grail https://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/cosmic-dust-analyzer/ http://descanso.jpl.nasa.gov/DPSummary/Juno_DESCANSO_Post121106H--Compact.pdf