CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.pdf

1. TOMAS CLAUDIO COLLEGES
COLLEGE OF LAW
Morong, Rizal
SYLLABUS
IN
CIVIL PROCEDURE 2
BY:
DEAN SALVADOR N. MOYA II, L.L.M., D.C.L.
Professor
Pilot Dean, Tomas Claudio Colleges, College of Law, Morong, Rizal
Managing Partner, Moya Ablola Ebarle Law Firm
MCLE Lecturer on Trial Advocacy
Bar Reviewer [Legal EDGE Review Center, Villasis Law Center, Powerhaus Review Center, Recoletos Law
Center, Magnificus Juris Reviews and Seminars Inc., UP Law Center, University of Cebu, Albano Review Center,
PUP Bar Review Center, University of San Jose Recoletos,]
Author [The 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure, Notes and Cases (2017); The Revised Guidelines on Continuous
Trial in Criminal Cases in Relation to The 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure (2018); Bar Notes and Cases in
Remedial Law (2018); Bar Notes and Cases in Criminal Law, 2018 & 2019; Notes and Cases in Remedial Law
(Volumes I-IV), 2019; Notes and Cases in Civil Procedure (Volumes I, II & IV), 2020; Notes and Cases in
Remedial Law, Volume IV (Evidence), 2020; Notes and Cases in Civil Procedure (Volume III), 2021; Bar
Reviewer in Remedial Law (Volumes I-IV), 2021]
Professor in Civil Procedure, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Spec. Pro., Remedial Law Review I & II, and
Criminal Law [TCC-COL, TSU-SOL, NEU-COL, SSCR-COL, UE-COL, BulSU-COL, UP-COL, PUP-COL, Wesleyan
University]

2. I. Rule 40 – Appeal from Municipal Trial Courts to the Regional Trial Courts
Section 2. When to appeal
a. Neypes. CA ( 469 SCRA 633, 14 Sept. 2005)
Section 7. Procedure in the Regional Trial Court
a. Sanico vs. People (G.R. No. 198753, 25 Mar. 2015)
b. Macaslang vs. Zamora (G.R. No. 156375, 30 May 2011)
Section 8. Appeal from orders dismissing case without trial; lack of
jurisdiction
a. De Vera, et al. vs. Santiago, Sr., et al. (G.R. No. 179457, 22 Jun. 2015)
II. Rule 41- Appeal from the Regional Trial Courts
Section 1. Subject of appeal
a. Lim and the People of the Philippines vs. Lim (G.R. No. 214163, 1 Jul.
2019)
b. Cagang vs. Sandiganbayan (G.R. No. 206438 and 206458, G.R. Nos.
210141-42, 31 Jul. 2018)
Section 5. Notice of Appeal
a. University of Mindanao, Inc. vs. PDIC (G.R. No. 181201, 21 Feb. 2011)
Section 9. Perfection of appeal; effect thereof
a. United Interior Manggahan Homeowners Assoc. vs. De Luna (G.R. No.
216788, 20 Nov. 2017)
III. Rule 42 – Petition for Review from the Regional Trial Courts to the Court of
Appeals
Section 6. Due Course
a. Heirs of Arturo Garcia I vs. Municipality of Iba(G.R. No. 162217, 22 Jul.
2015)
Section 9. Submission for decision
a. Sps. Fernandez, Sr. vs. Sps. Co(G.R. No. 167390, 26 Jul. 2010)

3. IV. Rule 43 – Appeals from the Court of Tax Appeals and Quasi-Judicial
Agencies to the Court of Appeals
Section 1. Scope
a. Narra Nickel Mining and Dev’t Corp. vs. Redmont Consolidated Mines
Corp. ( 777 SCRA 258, 9 Dec. 2015)
Section 2. Cases not covered
a. Lanzaderas, et al. vs. Amethyst Security and General Services, Inc. el al.
(G.R. No. 143604, 20 Jun. 20003)
Section 4. Period of Appeal
a. Maniebo vs. CA (G.R. No. 158708, 10 Aug. 2010)
Section 5. How Appeal Taken
a. Hadji-Sirad vs. CSC(G.R. No. 182267, 28 Aug. 2009)
V. Rule 44 – Ordinary Appealed Cases
Section 4. Docketing of case
a. University of Mindanao, Inc. vs. PDIC (G.R. No. 181201, 21 Feb. 2011)
Section 6. Dispensing with complete record
a. Bañez vs. Bañez (G.R. No. 132592, 23 Jan. 2002)
Section 7. Appellant’s Brief
a. Philippine Rabbit Bus Lines, Inc. vs. Goimic, Sr., et al. (G.R. No. 135507,
29 Nov. 2005)
b. Tiango, et al. vs. LBP (G.R. No. 153988, 6 Oct. 2010)
Section 10. Time for filing memoranda in special cases
a. Buena, Jr. vs. Benito (G.R. No. 181760, 14 Oct. 2014)
VI. Rule 45 – Appeal by Certiorari to the Supreme Court
Section 1. Filing of petition with the Supreme Court
a. Bintudan vs. COA(821 SCRA 211, 21 March 2017)

4. b. Noell Whessoe, Inc. vs. Independent Testing Consultants, Inc., et al.(G.R. No.
199851,7 November 2018)
Section 2. Time for filing; extension
a. Fernandez vs. CA (G.R. No. 131094, 16 May 2005)
Section 3. Docket and other lawful fees; proof of service of petition
a. Atilano vs. Asaali, (680 SCRA 345, 10 September 2012)
Section 6. Review Discretionary
a. Nasipit Lumber Co. and Philippine Wallboard Corp. vs. NOWN(G.R. No. 146225,
25 November 2004)
Section 7. Pleadings and documents that may be required; sanctions
a. MBTC vs. Absolute Management Corp. (G.R. No. 170498, 9 January 2013)
VII. Rule 46 – Original Cases
Section 3. Contents and Filing of Petition; effect of noncompliance with
requirements
a. Oasis Park Hotel vs. Navaluna, et al.( G.R. No. 197191, 21 November 2016)
b. People vs. Sandiganbayan and Abling(G.R. No. 198119, 27 September 2017)
c. PCGG vs. Dumayas(765 SCRA 524, 11 August 2015)
Section 4. Jurisdiction over person respondent, how acquired
a. Francisco vs. Loyola Plans Consolidated Inc.( G.R. No. 194134,1 February 2016)
Section 6. Determination of Factual Issues
a. Heirs of Lorenzo and Carmen Vidad vs. LBP(G.R. No. 166461, 30 April 2010)
Secton 7. Effect of failure to file comment
a. Megaforce Security and Allied Services, Inc. vs. Lactao (G.R. No. 160940, 21 July
2008)
VIII. Rule 47 – Annulment of Judgments or Final Orders and Resolutions
Section 1. Coverage
a. Pinausukan Seafood House vs. Far East Bank & Trust Co. (714 SCRA 226, 20
January 2014)

5. b. Teaño vs. Municipality of Navotas (784 SCRA 63, 15 February 2016)
Section 2. Grounds for annulment
a. Baclaran Marketing Corporation vs. Nieva (G.R. No. 189881,19 April 2017)
b. Arrieta vs. Arrieta (G.R. No. 234808, 19 November 2018)
Section 5. Action by the court
a. Tan Po Chu vs. CA (G.R. No. 184348,4 April 2016)
Section 8. Suspension of Prescriptive Period
a. Lasala vs. NFA (G.R. No. 171582,19 August 2015)
IX. Rule 48 – Preliminary Conference
X. Rule 49 – Oral Argument
XI. Rule 50 – Dismissal of Appeal
Section 1. Grounds for dismissal of appeal
a. Prudential Guarantee and Assurance Inc. vs. CA(G.R. No. 146559,13 Aug. 2004)
b. Ilusorio vs. Ilusorio-Yap(G.R. No. 171656, 17 March 2009)
c. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. Royal Ferry Services, Inc.(G.R. No. 188146,1
February 2017)
d. Beatingo vs. Gasis(G.R. No. 179641, 9 February 2011)
e. Suib vs. Ebbah(G.R. No. 182375, 2 December 2015)
f. Zamboanga Forest Managers Corp. vs. New Pacific Timber And Supply Co., et al.
(G.R. No. 173342, 13 October 2010)
g. Sps. Mendiola vs. CA (G.R. No. 159746, 18 July 2012)
Section 2. Dimissal of improper appeal to the Court of Appeals
a. Valderama vs. Arguelles(G.R. No. 223660, 2 April 2018)
b. Mitsubishi Motors Philippines Corp. vs. Bureau of Customs(759 SCRA 306, 17
June 2015)
Section 3. Withdrawal of Appeal
a. CIR vs. Nippon Express (Phils.) Corp.(G.R. No. 212920, 16 September 2015)
XII. Rule 51 – Judgment
Section 1. When case deemed submitted for judgment
a. De Liano vs. CA(G.R. No. 142316, 22 November 2001)
Section 4. Disposition of a case
a. LBP vs. Dalauta (G.R. No. 190004, 8 August 2017)
Section 5. Form of decision

6. a. Velarde vs. Social Justice Society(428 SCRA 283, 28 April 2004)
b. Rivera, Jr. vs. People(189 SCRA 331, 30 August 1990)
c. Heirs of Batori vs. The Register of Deeds of Benguet(G.R. No. 212611, 11 Feb.
2019)
d. Solid Homes, Inc. vs. Laserna and Cajipe(G.R. No. 166051, 8 April 2008)
Section 8. Questions that may be decided
a. Loyola vs. CA(G.R. No. 188658, 11 January 2017)
XIII. Rule 52 – Motion for Reconsideration
Section 1. Period of filing
a. Russel vs. Austria(G.R. No. 184542, 23 April 2010)
Section 2. Second Motion for Reconsideration
a. Laya, Jr. vs. Philippine Veterans Bank, et al.( G.R. No. 205813, 10 Jan. 2018)
b. SJS Officers vs. Lim(752 SCRA 215, 10 March 2015)
XIV. Rule 53 – New Trial
Section 1. Period for filing; ground
a. Cotabato Timberland Co., Inc. vs. C.Alcantara and Sons, Inc.(430 SCRA 227, 28
May 2004)
b. Custodio vs. Sandiganbayan(G.R. Nos. 96027-28, 8 March 2005)
XV. Rule 54 – Internal Business
XVI. Rule 55 – Publication of Judgments and Final Resolutions
XVII. Rule 56 – Original Cases
Section 1. Original cases cognizable
a. Republic of the Philippines vs. Maria Lourdes P.A. Sereno(G.R. No. 237428, 19
June 2018)
b. Saguisag vs. Ochoa(779 SCRA 241, 12 January 2016)
Section 2. Rules applicable
a. SM Land, Inc. vs. Bases Conversion and Development Authority(G.R. No.
203655, 7 September 2015)
b. Department of Education, Culture and Sports vs. Carmel Development, Inc.(
G.R. No. 142572, 20 February 2002)
Section 3. Mode of Appeal
a. Dela Cruz vs. People(G.R. No. 209387, 11 January 2016)
Section 5. Grounds for dismissal of appeal
a. Ola vs. People (G.R. No. 195547, 2 December 2015)

7. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES
XVIII. Rule 57 – Preliminary Attachment
Section 1. Grounds upon which attachment may issue
a. Lim vs. Lazaro ( 700 SCRA 547, 3 Jul. 2013)
b. PCIB vs. Alejandro (533 SCRA 738, 21 Sept 2007)
c. Repulic vs. Sandiganbayan ( 605 SCRA 193, 5 Oct 2016)
d. Phil. National Construction Corp. vs. Dy (472 SCRA 1, 3 Oct 2005)
Section 2. Issuance and Contents of Order
a. Luzon Dev’t Bank vs. Krishnan( 755 SCRA 358, 13 Apr. 2015)
Section 3. Affidavit and Bond Required
a. Watercraft Venture Corp. vs. Wolfe ( 770 SCRA 179, 9 Sept. 2015)
Section 4. Condition of appellant’s bond
a. Republic vs. Garcia ( 527 SCRA 495, 12 Jul. 2007)
Section 5. Manner of attaching property
a. Torres vs. Satsatin ( 605 SCRA 453, 25 Nov. 2009)
Section 6. Sheriff’s Return
a. Vda. De Velayo vs. Ramos ( A.M. No. P-99-1332, 17 Jan. 2002)
Section 11. When attached property may be sold after levy on attachment and
before entry of judgment
a. China Banking Corp. vs. Asian Construction and Dev’t Corp. ( G.R. No. 158271,
8 Apr. 2008)
Section 12. Discharge of attachment upon giving counter-bond
a. BPI vs. Lee( 676 SCRA 171, 1 Aug. 2012)
b. Marphil Export Corp. vs. Allied Banking Corp. (803 SCRA 627, 21 Sept. 2016)
Section 13. Discharge of attachment on other grounds
a. Sps. Yu vs. Ngo Yet Te ( 514 SCRA 423, 2007)
b. Lim vs. Lazaro ( 700 SCRA 547, 3 Jul. 2013)

8. Section 17. Recovery upon the counter-bond
a. United Pulp and Paper Co., Inc. vs. Acropolis Central Guaranty Corp. ( 664
SCRA 65, 25 Jan. 2012)
Section 20. Claim for damages on account of improper, irregular or excessive
attachment.
a. Excellent Quality Apparel, Inc. vs. Visayan Surety & Insurance Corp and Far
Eastern Surety & Insurance Corp. ( G.R. No. 212025, 1 Jul. 2015)
XIX. Rule 58 – Preliminary Injunction
Section 1. Preliminary Injunction defined; classes
a. Nerwin Industries Corp. vs. PNOC-Energy Dev’t Corp. (689 SCRA 173, 11 Apr.
2012)
b. City Mayor of Baguio vs. Masweng ( 611 SCRA 340, 2 Feb. 2010)
Section 2. Who may grant preliminary injunction
a. Ortega, Jr. vs. Dacara ( 814 SCRA 105, 11 Jan. 2017)
b. Medina vs. Canoy ( 666 SCRA 424, 22 Feb. 2012)
c. PSALM vs. CA ( 817 SCRA 51, 15 Feb. 2017)
Section 3. Grounds for issuance of preliminary injunction
a. St. James College of Parañaque vs. Equitable PCI Bank (627 SCRA 328, 9 Aug.
2010)
Section 5. Preliminary Injunction not granted without notice; exception
a. Nesounds Broadcasting Network, Inc. vs. Dy (583 SCRA 333, 2 Apr. 2009)
Section 6. Grounds for objection to, or for motion of dissoulution of, injunction or
restraining order
a. Power Sites and Signs, Inc. vs. United Neon (G.R. No. 163406, 24 Nov. 2009)
Section 9. When final injunction granted
a. BPI vs. Judge Hontanosas, Jr. (G.R. No. 157163, 25 Jun. 2014)
b. Republic vs. Cortez, Sr. (G.R. No. 197472, 7 Sept. 2015)
XX. Rule 59 – Receivership
Section 1. Appointment of Receiver
a. Vivares vs. Reyes ( 545 SCRA 80, 13 Feb. 2008)
b. Chavez vs. CA ( 610 SCRA 399, 20 Jan. 2010)
c. Koruga vs. Arcenas ( 590 SCRA 49, 19 Jun. 2009)
XXI. Rule 60 – Replevin

9. Section 1. Application
a. Enriquez vs. The Mercantile Insurance Inc. (G.R. No. 210950, 15 Aug. 2018)
b. SMART Communnications, Inc. vs. Regina M. Astorga (542 SCRA 434, 28 Jan.
2008)
Section 9. Judgment
a. PCI Leasing and Finance, Inc. vs. Dai ( 533 SCRA 611, 21 Sept 2007)
Section 10. Judgment to include recovery against sureties
a. Advent Capital and Finance Corp. vs. Young ( 655 SCRA 118, 3 Aug. 2011)
XXII. Rule 61 – Support
Section 1. Application
a. Mabugay-Otamias vs. Republic ( 792 SCRA 418, 8 Jun. 2018)
Section 3. Hearing
a. Dolina vs. Vallecera ( 638 SCRA 707, 15 Dec. 2010)
b. Sps. Lim vs. Lim ( G.R. No. 163209, 30 Oct. 2009)
Section 4. Order
a. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan ( 562 SCRA 152, 13 Dec. 2011)
Section 5. Enforcement of order
a. Lim-Lua vs. Lua ( 697 SCRA 237, 5 Jun. 2013)
Section 6. Support in criminal cases
a. Del Socorro vs. Van Wilsem (G.R. No. 193707, 10 Dec. 2014)
SPECIAL CIVIL ACTIONS
XXIII. Rule 62 – Interpleader
Section 1. When Interpleader proper
a. Lui Enterprises, Inc. vs. Zuellig Pharma Corp. (719 SCRA 88, 12 Mar. 2014)
b. Ramos vs. Ramos ( 399 SCRA 43, 11 Mar. 2003)
Section 2. Order
a. Bank of Commerce vs. Planters Dev’t Bank ( 681 SCRA 521, 24 Sept. 2012)

10. Section 5. Answer and other pleadings
a. Lui Enterprises, Inc. vs. Zuellig Pharma Corp. ( 719 SCRA 88, 12 Mar. 2014)
XXIV. Rule 63 – Declaratory Relief and Similar Remedies
Section 1. Who may file petition
a. Republic vs. Roque ( 706 SCRA 273, 24 Sept. 2013)
b. Gamboa vs. Teves ( 652 SCRA 690, 28 Jun. 2011)
Section 2. Parties
a. Galicto vs. Aquino ( 667 SCRA 150, 28 Feb. 2012)
b. Purisima vs. Lazatin ( 811 SCRA 205, 29 Nov. 2016)
Section 3. Notice on Solicitor General
a. Lucena Grand Central Terminal, Inc. vs. JAC Liner, Inc. ( 452 SCRA 174, 23
Feb. 2005)
Section 5. Court action discretionary
a. Villanueva vs. JBC ( 755 SCRA 182, 7 Apr. 2015)
b. De Borja vs. Pinalakas na Ugnayan ng Maliliit na Mangingisda ng Luzon,
Mindanao at Visayas ( 823 SCRA 550, 19 Apr. 2017)
XXV. Rule 64 – Review of Judgments and Final Orders or Resolutions of the Commission
on Elections and the Commission on Audit
Section 1. Scope
a. Typoco vs. COMELEC ( 614 SCRA 391, 5 Mar. 2010)
b. Naval vs. COMELEC ( 729 SCRA 299, 8 Jul. 2014)
c. The Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC ( 795 SCRA 596, 5 Jul. 2016)
d. Reblora vs. AFP (698 SCRA 727, 18 Jun. 2013)
Section 2. Mode of Review
a. Small Business Corp. vs. COA ( G.R. No. 230628, 3 Oct. 2017)
b. City of General Santos vs. COA ( 742 SCRA 210, 25 Nov. 2014)
Section 3. Time to file petition
a. Villarosa vs. Festin (132 SCRA 110, 5 Aug. 2014)
b. Fortune Life Insurance Co., Inc. vs. COA Proper (748 SCRA 286, 27 Jan. 2015)
Section 8. Effect of filing
a. Arnado vs. COMELEC ( 757 SCRA 168, 18 Aug. 2015)
XXVI. Rule 65 – Certiorari, Prohibition and Mandamus
Section 1. Petition for certiorari

11. a. AMCOW vs. GCC Approved Medical Centers Assoc. Inc. (812 SCRA 452, 6 Dec.
2016)
b. Candelaria vs. RTC, Br. 42, City of San Fernando, Pampanga ( 730 SCRA 1, 14
Jul. 2014)
c. The Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC ( 747 SCRA 1, 21 Jan. 2015)
d. Golez vs. Navarro ( 689 SCRA 689, 30 Jan. 2013)
Section 2. Petition for prohibition
a. Vivas vs. Monetary Board of the Banko Sentral ng Pilipinas ( 703 SCRA 290, 7
Aug. 2013)
b. Career Executive Service Board vs. CSC ( 819 SCRA 482, 7 Mar. 2017)
c. LTFRB vs. Stronghold Insurance Co., Inc. ( 706 SCRA 675, 2 Oct. 2013)
Section 3. Petition for mandamus
a. Special People, Inc. Foundation vs. Canda ( 701 Phil. 635, 2013)
b. Knights of Rizal vs. DMCI Homes, Inc. (824 SCRA 327, 25 Apr. 2017)
c. Jardeleza vs. Sereno ( 733 SCRA 279, 19 Aug. 2014)
d. Republic vs. St. Vincent de Paul Colleges, Inc. ( 678 SCRA 738, 22 Aug. 2012)
e. Republic vs. Caguioa ( 691 SCRA 306, 20 Feb. 2013)
Section 4. When and where to file the petition
a. LBP vs. Atlanta Industries, Inc. ( 729 SCRA 12, 2 Jul. 2014)
b. Vinuya vs. Romulo ( 732 SCRA 596, 12 Aug. 2014)
Section 5. Respondents and costs in certain cases
a. BPI vs. Lee ( 678 SCRA 171, 1 Aug. 2012)
b. Abdulrahman vs. Office of the Ombudsman for Mindanao ( 704 SCRA 124, 28
Aug. 2013)
Section 7. Expediting proceedings; injunctive relief
a. Mari vs. Gonzales ( 657 SCRA 414, 12 Feb. 2011)
XXVII. Rule 66 – Quo Warranto
Section 1. Action by Government against individuals
a. Consular Area Residents Assoc., Inc. vs. Casanova ( 789 SCRA 209, 12 Apr.
2016)
Section 2. When Solicitor General or public prosecutor must commence action
a. Republic vs. Sereno ( G.R. No. 237428, 11 May 2018)
Section 3. When Solicitor General or public prosecutor may commence action with
permission of court

12. a. Republic vs. Sereno ( G.R. No. 237428, 19 Jun. 2018)
Section 5. When an individual may commence such an action
a. Topacio vs. Ong ( 574 SCRA 817, 18 Dec. 2008)
b. Aguinaldo III vs. Aquino III ( 811 SCRA 304, 29 Nov. 2016)
XXVIII. Rule 67 – Expropriation
Section 1. The complaint
a. Republic vs. Legazpi, Sr. ( 670 SCRA 110, 18 Apr. 2012)
Section 2. Entry of plaintiff upon depositing value with authorized government
depository
a. National Corporation vs. Posada ( 752 SCRA 550, 11 Mar. 2015)
b. DOTC vs. Abecina ( 795 SCRA 214, 29 Jun. 2016)
Section 4. Order of expropriation
a. NPC vs. Saludares ( 671 SCRA 266, 25 Apr. 2012)
Section 5. Ascertainment of compensation
a. Sec. of DPWH, et al. vs. Sps. Tecson ( 700 SCRA 243, 1 Jul. 2013)
b. Republic vs. Asia Pacific Intergrated Steel Corp. (719 SCRA 50, 12 Mar. 2014)
Section 8. Action upon commissioners’ report
a. Republic vs. Sps. Tan (G.R. No. 191448, 16 Nov. 2011)
b. Republic vs. C.C. Unson Co., Inc. ( 785 SCRA 202, 22 Feb. 2016)
Section 9. Uncertain ownership; conflicting claims
a. Republic vs. Tatad ( G.R. No. 187677, 17 Apr. 2013)
Section 11. Entry not delayed by appeal; effect of reversal
a. Delicano et al. vs. Pechaten Corp. ( G.R. No. 191251, 7 Sept. 2011)
XXIX. Rule 68 – Foreclosure of Real Estate Mortgage
Section 1. Complaint in action for foreclosure
a. Korea Exchange Bank vs. FILKOR Business Intergrated, Inc. (G.R. No. 138292,
10 Apr. 2002)
XXX. Rule 69 – Partition
Section 1. Complaint in action for partition of real estate
a. Oribello vs. CA ( 765 SCRA 18, 5 Aug. 2015)
b. Bautista vs. Bautista ( 820 SCRA 40, 8 Mar. 2017)

13. XXXI. Rule 70 – Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer
Section 1. Who may institute proceedings, and when
a. Deparment of Education vs. Casibang ( 782 SCRA 326, 27 Jan. 2016)
b. Mangsaer vs. Ugay (744 SCRA 13, 3 Dec. 2014)
Section 2. Lessor to proceed against lessee only after demand
a. Manzanilla vs. Waterfields Industries Corp. ( 730 SCRA 104, 18 Jul. 2014)
Section 3. Summary Procedure
a. Casilang Sr. vs. Casilang-Dizon (G.R. No. 180269, 20 Feb. 2013)
Section 4. Pleadings allowed
a. Victorias Milling Co., Inc. vs. CA (622 SCRA 131, 29 Jun. 2010)
Section 5. Action on complaint
a. Apostolic Vicar of Tabuk Inc. vs. Sison ( 782 SCRA 316, 27 Jan. 2016)
Section 13. Prohibited pleadings and motions
a. Guerrero vs. Domingo ( G.R. No. 156142, 23 Mar. 2011)
Section 19. Immediate execution of judgment; how to stay same
a. Acbang vs. Luczon, Jr. ( 713 SCRA 346, 15 Jan. 2014)
XXXII. Rule 71 – Contempt
Section 1. Direct Contempt punished summarily
a. CASCONA vs. Dominguez ( 754 SCRA 385, 25 Mar. 2015)
b. Panadero vs. COMELEC ( 788 SCRA 392, 5 Apr. 2016)
Section 2. Remedy therefrom
a. Baculi vs. Belen (681 SCRA 489, 24 Sept. 2012)
b. Tan Usman (A.M. No. RTJ-11-2666, 15 Feb. 2011)
Section 3. Indirect contempt to be punished after charge and hearing
a. Rivulet Agro-Industrial Corp. vs. Paruñgao, et al. ( 688 SCRA 485, 2013)
Section 5. Where charge to be filed
a. J.O.S. Managing Builders, Inc. vs. United Oversees Bank Phil. ( 803 SCRA 264,
14 Sept. 2016)

14. Section 6. Hearing; release on bail
a. Visitacion vs. Libre ( 459 SCRA 398, 8 Jun. 2005)
Section 9. Proceeding when party released on bail fails to answer
a. Magleo vs. De Juan-Quinagoran ( 739 SCRA 638, 12 Nov. 2014)
Section 11. Review of judgment or final order
a. Digital Communication Phil. Inc. vs. Cantos ( 710 SCRA 514, 12 Nov. 2014)
Section 12. Contempt against quasi-judicial entities
a. Trinidad vs. Fama Realty Inc. (792 SCRA 295, 6 Jun. 2016)
b. Robosa vs. NLRC ( 665 SCRA 434, 2012)
REFERENCE:
NOTES AND CASES IN REMEDIAL LAW VOL.I (Part III-IV), 2020 Editions by Dean
Salvador N. Moya II
BAR REVIEWER IN REMEDIAL LAW VOL.I (Part II), 2021 Edition by Dean Salvador N.
Moya II
Published and distributed by Central Book Supply, Inc., 927 Quezon Avenue, Quezon