2. …At an average age of 42 years…the
prevalence of common risk factors
other than hypertension in India…
17
64
38
33
Diabetes >Lipids Smoking LVH
Populationfrequency%
…with 47% having at least 2 risk factors…
Nat Med J India, 2005; 18: 59-65.
3. Each Additional Risk Factor
Substantially Increases Risk of a
Cardiovascular Event …
6 7.1
12
18.8
24.7
44.8
10yearCVDeventrisk%
… In a 42 year old Indian male…
No risk
factor
+ > BP
+Smoking
+ Lipids
+ Diabetes
+ LVH
Nat Med J India, 2005; 18: 59-65.
5. Amlodipine ± perindopril better Atenolol ± thiazide better
0.50 0.70 1.00 1.45
Secondary
Total coronary end point
Total CV event and procedures
All-cause mortality
Cardiovascular mortality
Fatal and non-fatal stroke
Tertiary
Unstable angina
New-onset diabetes mellitus
New-onset renal impairment
2.00
All secondary & tertiary end-points in
favor of amlodipine + perindopril
Relative risk reduction
13%
16%
11%
24%
23%
30%
15%
Lancet 2005; 366: 895–906.
6. ACE inhibitors prevent CV events in
CAD patients with heart failure
AIRE Study Investigators. Lancet. 1993;342:821-8. Køber L et al. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1670-6.
SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:293-302. SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:685-91.
Pfeffer MA et al. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:669-77.
AIRE
TRACE
SOLVD
(Treatment)
SAVE
0.002
0.001
0.0036
0.019
0 5 10 15 20 25
Risk reduction in total mortality (%)
30
SOLVD
(Prevention)
0.30
27%
22%
8%
16%
19%
P
7. Studies confirm the benefits in patients
in all types of CAD patients
Yusuf S et al. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:154-160.
HOPEHOPE
Placebo
Ramipril
P<0.0003
2000150010005000
0.0
0.05
0.1
0.15
Days of follow-up
%
22%22%
All high risk patients with CADAll high risk patients with CAD
8. EUROPA study confirmed the
benefits of all types of CAD patients
PerindoprilPerindopril
PlaceboPlacebo
Risk reductionRisk reduction
YearsYears
00
22
44
66
88
1010
1212
1414
00 11 22 33 44
P<0.0003P<0.0003
EUROPA study, Lancet, 2003;362:782-788.
(%)(%)
20%20%
ACE inhibitor perindoprilACE inhibitor perindopril
Prevents MI, CV death & cardiac arrestPrevents MI, CV death & cardiac arrest
10. Short-term trials confirm the
benefits of ACE inhibitors
Odds ratio (95% CI)
220/3044 (7.23%)
570/9682 (5.89%)
2035/29,028 (7.01%)
676/7460 (9.06%)
CONSENSUS-II*
Test for Heterogeneity: χ2
5.8 (2p = 0.1) df = 3
Deaths (n)
GISSI-3
ISIS-4
CCS-1
Total
ControlControl
1.0 1.25 1.50.750.5
727/7489 (9.71%)
650/9712 (6.69%)
192/3046 (6.30%)
2171/29,022 (7.48%)
3501/49,214(7.11%) 3740/49,269 (7.59%)
ACEIACEI
ACEI better Control better
Treat Eff: χ2
(2p = 0.004)
ACE Inhibitor MI Collaborative Group. Circulation. 1998;97:2202-12.
* IV infusion followed by oral therapy
Randomized (n)
11. Same confirmed in long-term trials
with ACE inhibitors
Flather M Lancet 2000;355:1575-81Flather M Lancet 2000;355:1575-81
0.5 1 1.5 2
Mortality
Death + re-infarction
Re-infarction
Death + MI+
Re-admission HF
P <0.0001
P=0.0057
P<0.0001
P<0.0001
ACEI better Placebo better
0.740.74
0.800.80
0.750.75
0.750.75
SAVE – AIRE – TRACE 5966 patientsSAVE – AIRE – TRACE 5966 patients
12. Class I
1. An ACE inhibitor should be
administered orally within the first 24
hours of STEMI to patients with anterior
infarction, pulmonary congestion, or
LVEF less than 0.40, in the absence of
hypotension
(Level of Evidence: A)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for the
Management of Patients With ST-
Elevation Myocardial Infarction
13. An ACE inhibitor administered orally within the
first 24 hours of STEMI can be useful in patients
without anterior infarction, pulmonary congestion,
or LVEF less than 0.40 in the absence of
hypotension.
(Level of Evidence: B)
ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of
Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
15. Guidelines recommend ACE inhibitors
in Recurrent stroke prevention
JNC 7 refers to PROGRESS study
Latest ASA / ASH refers to PROGRESS study
16. Overview of
ACE inhibitors in heart failure
5
Cumulative
mortality (%)
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4
Time since randomisation (years)
All trials
ACE-I
Placeb0
6391
6372
5378
5279
4204
4025
2457
2364
892
742
Flather et al. Lancet 2000; 355: 1575-81
17. ESC guidelines on CHF
“ACE inhibitors are recommended as first line therapy
in all patients, with or without symptoms, who have a
reduced LVEF (< 40 or 45%)…to improve survival,
symptoms, functional capacity, and reduce
hospitalization.”
Level of evidence A, Class of recommendation 1
Swedberg K et al. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 115-1140.
18. ACE inhibitors have different…
Ferrari ExpRCT. 2205; 3; 15-29
… pharmacological and clinical properties
Captopril Fosinopril Enalapril Lisinopril Ramipril Trandolapril Perindopril
This is because recent data confirms our clinical experience, that our hypertensives are younger and we are at increased risk of developing of cardiovascular disease.
In a country like ours the role of prescribed therapy is all the more important as it should be able to slow down or prevent the progression of cardiovascular disease.
We all know that the presence of risk factors significantly increases the overall risk for cardiovascular events.
In this scenario the drugs we use should be effective across the spectrum of cardiovascular disease.
The two most widely studied drug classes in the recent years to have a significant impact on the cardiovascular continuum are ACE inhibitors and Statins.
Despite similar blood pressure reduction amlodipine+perindopril group produced a significant and superior 24% reduction in CV mortality as compared to betablocker+diuretic arm.
What ever the end point we take this was in favor of Amlodipine + perindopril group.
Based on these trials ACE inhibtors in general are recommended in all CAD patients with LV dysfunction
What about CAD patients without LV dysfunction.
Two land mark trials HOPE and EUROPA have demonstrated the benefits of ACE inhibitors in CAD patients even without LV dysfunction.
The HOPE trial confirmed the benefits of ramipril in CAD patients without LV dysfunction.
However, the evidence was in CAD patients at high levels of risk.
The subsequent EUROPA trial with perindopril has bridged the gap by involving patients at all levels of risk.
Treatment with perindopril reduced the relative risk of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI or cardiac arrest by 20%.
This reduction was seen on top of optimal therapy like aspirin, statin and all other seconadry preventive therapies.
Based on the evidence from these two land mark trials the latest ESC guidelines on stable angina recommend ACE inhibitors in all CAD patients
Short term trials with ACE inhibitors have confirmed the benefits of ACE inhibitors in patients of Acute myocardial infarction.
The chronic usage of ACE inhibitors also results in significant reduction in myocardial infarction and death.
However majority of these studies are performed in patients with low ejection fraction.
What about AMI patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Please read the slide
Please read the slide
In prevention of secondary stroke, perindopril has the distinction of being the only ACE inhibitor having the evidence in a large clinical specially done in patients with recurrent stroke.
Treatment with perindopril on top of optimal therapies led to a significant reduction in all types of stroke including the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.
Based on the evidence from the PROGRESS study ACE inhibitors are recommended in the management of stroke.
All patients with heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be considered for treatment with an ACE inhibitor.Treatment should be instituted before beta-blockade is introduced.
A prospective systematic overview, based on data from individual patients from five long-term randomised trials that assessed ACE inhibitors in 12,763 patients with left-ventricular dysfunction or heart failure, has demonstrated that the ACE inhibitor group had:
Reduced the rates of death, reinfarction and readmission.
These benefits were observed early after the start of therapy and persisted long term.The benefits of treatment on all outcomes were independent of age, sex, and baseline use of diuretics, aspirin, and beta-blockers.
Please read the slide
Please read the slide
They have different acceptability profile, so they differ on there effects on clinical outcomes.
We need to use only evidence based ACE inhibitors in clinical practice.