SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
The media effects debate 
(hegemony vs. pluralism) 
The classification and regulation of video games, television and films are 
notable examples that are all to do with the need for the authorities to 
‘protect’ people from material which might cause social harm of one kind or 
another. This will be achieved either through classification or through 
censorship.
The media effects debate 
(OCR Media Studies for A2, Third edition, Julian McDougnall, Page 114) 
At the other end of the regulatory spectrum, we find 
forms of regulation that at first glance appear to be 
unrelated to this ‘protective obligation. So while we 
are thinking about media effects constantly In one 
way or another, it is useful to distinguish between 
three kinds of media regulation: 
 Regulation of media content 
 Regulation of media access and distribution 
 Regulation of media ownership and commercial 
practices. 
Hegemony vs. Pluralism 
Passive’ audience/hypodermic theory are sometimes 
referred to overall as ‘Media Effects Theory’, i.e. the 
media has a direct and powerful effect on its 
audience.
(http://www.mediaknowall.com/as_alevel/alevkeyconcepts/alevelkeycon.php?pageID=audience) 
The hypodermic needle theory 
Dating from the 1920s, this theory was the first attempt to explain how mass audiences might react to mass media. It is a crude 
model and suggests that audiences passively receive the information transmitted via a media text, without any attempt on their part 
to process or challenge the data. 
Governments had just discovered the power of advertising to communicate a message, and produced propaganda to try and sway 
populaces to their way of thinking. Basically, the Hypodermic Needle Model suggests that the information from a text passes into 
the mass consciousness of the audience unmediated, i.e. the experience, intelligence and opinion of an individual are not relevant to 
the reaction of the text. 
This theory suggests that, as an audience, we are manipulated by the creators of media texts, and that our behavior and thinking 
might be easily changed by media-makers. It assumes that the audience are passive and all different. 
This theory is still quoted during moral panics by parents, politician and pressure groups, and is used to explain why certain groups in 
society should not be exposed to certain media texts(comics in the 1950’s and rap music in the 2000’s), for fear that they will watch 
or read sexual or violent behavior and will then act them out themselves.
Passive Audience 
Theory 
The Passive audience Theory is 
connected to the Hypodermic 
syringe theory in that they believe 
the audience is ‘passive’ recipient 
of media output. 
Passive theories tend to see the 
audience behavior as directly 
affected by media content and 
theorists are connected to measure 
these effects, particularly with 
regard to the effects of media 
portrayals of sex and violence. 
(Source: AS/A2 Media Studies, David Probert, Page 110)
Active audience theory and 
Postmodernism/pluralism 
Any of various theories of audience that see 
the audience as active participants in the 
process of decoding and making sense of 
media texts. 
In active theories, the beliefs, values, social 
and educational background and life 
experience audience bring to a text are seen 
as influencing the way they accept, negotiate, 
or challenge the preferred reading. Basically, 
they audience are free to develop their own 
interpretation. 
(Source: AS/A2 Media Studies, David Probert, Page 2) 
Links to Pluralism: This theory links to pluralism as 
they also believe the audience are free to have 
their own views and that the media do not affect 
their opinion. 
Links to Postmodernism: Active audience 
theory links to Post modern texts as they tend 
not to have embedded ideology therefor are 
not patronising to an audience and allow them 
to develop their own interpretations.

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

The Media effects debate
The Media effects debateThe Media effects debate
The Media effects debate
 
Theory of Mass Communication Overview 2017
Theory of Mass Communication Overview  2017Theory of Mass Communication Overview  2017
Theory of Mass Communication Overview 2017
 
Media ‘Effects’ Debates
Media ‘Effects’ DebatesMedia ‘Effects’ Debates
Media ‘Effects’ Debates
 
Mass communication theories
Mass communication theoriesMass communication theories
Mass communication theories
 
Media audience theories
Media audience theoriesMedia audience theories
Media audience theories
 
Eras of mass communication theories
Eras of mass communication theoriesEras of mass communication theories
Eras of mass communication theories
 
Media Effects Essay
Media Effects EssayMedia Effects Essay
Media Effects Essay
 
Two step flow of communication
Two step flow of communicationTwo step flow of communication
Two step flow of communication
 
Theories of communication
Theories of communicationTheories of communication
Theories of communication
 
Audience Investigation
Audience InvestigationAudience Investigation
Audience Investigation
 
The Effects Debate
The Effects DebateThe Effects Debate
The Effects Debate
 
David gauntlett’s ’10 things wrong with the media 'effects' model
David gauntlett’s ’10 things wrong with the media 'effects' modelDavid gauntlett’s ’10 things wrong with the media 'effects' model
David gauntlett’s ’10 things wrong with the media 'effects' model
 
M6 com320 mass_commtheories
M6 com320 mass_commtheoriesM6 com320 mass_commtheories
M6 com320 mass_commtheories
 
An Overview of Communication Theories
An Overview of Communication TheoriesAn Overview of Communication Theories
An Overview of Communication Theories
 
Theories of Mass Media
Theories of Mass MediaTheories of Mass Media
Theories of Mass Media
 
Bullet theory
Bullet theoryBullet theory
Bullet theory
 
Audience theory
Audience theoryAudience theory
Audience theory
 
Multi step flow theory
Multi step flow theoryMulti step flow theory
Multi step flow theory
 

Viewers also liked

IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011
IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011
IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011Vernon Benjamin
 
Chapters 12,13,14
Chapters 12,13,14Chapters 12,13,14
Chapters 12,13,143199312
 
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003imckur
 
Heat Of Rx
Heat Of RxHeat Of Rx
Heat Of Rxboonec02
 
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.com
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.comTop 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.com
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.comTop3Magazine
 
L3 l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailers
L3   l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailersL3   l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailers
L3 l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailersbethanyvaughan
 
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)Victoria Andreyeva
 
My helping hands criterzize
My helping hands criterzizeMy helping hands criterzize
My helping hands criterzizebavuongprovip
 
Diapositivas My day- kari.honores
Diapositivas My day- kari.honoresDiapositivas My day- kari.honores
Diapositivas My day- kari.honoreskarihonores
 
Jules quesnel division 1 info for the week of june 02, 2014
Jules quesnel division 1  info for the week of  june 02, 2014Jules quesnel division 1  info for the week of  june 02, 2014
Jules quesnel division 1 info for the week of june 02, 2014Bob Boudreau
 

Viewers also liked (17)

IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011
IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011
IAD Introduction to Lexington - 5-2011
 
Chapters 12,13,14
Chapters 12,13,14Chapters 12,13,14
Chapters 12,13,14
 
Pdhpe
PdhpePdhpe
Pdhpe
 
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003
технологии на уроках математики 17.04 97 2003
 
Heat Of Rx
Heat Of RxHeat Of Rx
Heat Of Rx
 
Test De Exceso De Trabajo
Test De Exceso De TrabajoTest De Exceso De Trabajo
Test De Exceso De Trabajo
 
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.com
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.comTop 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.com
Top 3 Richest people in the world~Top3Magazine.com
 
Team work
Team workTeam work
Team work
 
L3 l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailers
L3   l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailersL3   l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailers
L3 l4 -textual analysis of 2 soap opera trailers
 
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)
Meta zh itt_ya_suchasnoyi_lyudini (1)
 
Nl chat
Nl chatNl chat
Nl chat
 
My helping hands criterzize
My helping hands criterzizeMy helping hands criterzize
My helping hands criterzize
 
Diapositivas My day- kari.honores
Diapositivas My day- kari.honoresDiapositivas My day- kari.honores
Diapositivas My day- kari.honores
 
la navidad
la navidadla navidad
la navidad
 
Presentación1
Presentación1Presentación1
Presentación1
 
Jules quesnel division 1 info for the week of june 02, 2014
Jules quesnel division 1  info for the week of  june 02, 2014Jules quesnel division 1  info for the week of  june 02, 2014
Jules quesnel division 1 info for the week of june 02, 2014
 
Raonia solucions presentació
Raonia solucions presentacióRaonia solucions presentació
Raonia solucions presentació
 

Similar to Media effects debate hegemony vs pluralism

How Audiences Respond to Media Products
How Audiences Respond to Media ProductsHow Audiences Respond to Media Products
How Audiences Respond to Media Productsnixon2011
 
Audience theories
Audience theoriesAudience theories
Audience theoriesMassey2412
 
The media effects debate
The media effects debateThe media effects debate
The media effects debateemilyknightx
 
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptxJamesDixon10403
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studiesLeah DePalo
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studiesLeah DePalo
 
Audience theory
Audience theoryAudience theory
Audience theoryNINANC
 
Media Theories
Media TheoriesMedia Theories
Media Theoriesshydax
 
Media Theories
Media TheoriesMedia Theories
Media Theoriesshydax
 
uses and grats and dependency theory
uses and grats and dependency theoryuses and grats and dependency theory
uses and grats and dependency theoryCHSGmedia
 
dependency theory and Uuses and gratification
dependency theory and Uuses and gratificationdependency theory and Uuses and gratification
dependency theory and Uuses and gratificationCHSGmedia
 
Media audiences
Media audiencesMedia audiences
Media audiencesMaxGreen25
 

Similar to Media effects debate hegemony vs pluralism (20)

How Audiences Respond to Media Products
How Audiences Respond to Media ProductsHow Audiences Respond to Media Products
How Audiences Respond to Media Products
 
Audience theories
Audience theoriesAudience theories
Audience theories
 
The media effects debate
The media effects debateThe media effects debate
The media effects debate
 
Audience Theory
Audience TheoryAudience Theory
Audience Theory
 
Audience
AudienceAudience
Audience
 
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx
6.4 - Relationship between Producers and Audience.pptx
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studies
 
Cultural studies
Cultural studiesCultural studies
Cultural studies
 
2. Media audiences
2. Media audiences2. Media audiences
2. Media audiences
 
Audience theory
Audience theoryAudience theory
Audience theory
 
Media audiences
Media audiencesMedia audiences
Media audiences
 
Media Theories
Media TheoriesMedia Theories
Media Theories
 
Media Theories
Media TheoriesMedia Theories
Media Theories
 
Audience theory
Audience theoryAudience theory
Audience theory
 
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared ResourceSociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
SociologyExchange.co.uk Shared Resource
 
uses and grats and dependency theory
uses and grats and dependency theoryuses and grats and dependency theory
uses and grats and dependency theory
 
dependency theory and Uuses and gratification
dependency theory and Uuses and gratificationdependency theory and Uuses and gratification
dependency theory and Uuses and gratification
 
Audience theory
Audience theoryAudience theory
Audience theory
 
Media audiences
Media audiencesMedia audiences
Media audiences
 
Effects and audiences lessons 2 and 3
Effects and audiences lessons 2 and 3Effects and audiences lessons 2 and 3
Effects and audiences lessons 2 and 3
 

Media effects debate hegemony vs pluralism

  • 1.
  • 2. The media effects debate (hegemony vs. pluralism) The classification and regulation of video games, television and films are notable examples that are all to do with the need for the authorities to ‘protect’ people from material which might cause social harm of one kind or another. This will be achieved either through classification or through censorship.
  • 3. The media effects debate (OCR Media Studies for A2, Third edition, Julian McDougnall, Page 114) At the other end of the regulatory spectrum, we find forms of regulation that at first glance appear to be unrelated to this ‘protective obligation. So while we are thinking about media effects constantly In one way or another, it is useful to distinguish between three kinds of media regulation:  Regulation of media content  Regulation of media access and distribution  Regulation of media ownership and commercial practices. Hegemony vs. Pluralism Passive’ audience/hypodermic theory are sometimes referred to overall as ‘Media Effects Theory’, i.e. the media has a direct and powerful effect on its audience.
  • 4. (http://www.mediaknowall.com/as_alevel/alevkeyconcepts/alevelkeycon.php?pageID=audience) The hypodermic needle theory Dating from the 1920s, this theory was the first attempt to explain how mass audiences might react to mass media. It is a crude model and suggests that audiences passively receive the information transmitted via a media text, without any attempt on their part to process or challenge the data. Governments had just discovered the power of advertising to communicate a message, and produced propaganda to try and sway populaces to their way of thinking. Basically, the Hypodermic Needle Model suggests that the information from a text passes into the mass consciousness of the audience unmediated, i.e. the experience, intelligence and opinion of an individual are not relevant to the reaction of the text. This theory suggests that, as an audience, we are manipulated by the creators of media texts, and that our behavior and thinking might be easily changed by media-makers. It assumes that the audience are passive and all different. This theory is still quoted during moral panics by parents, politician and pressure groups, and is used to explain why certain groups in society should not be exposed to certain media texts(comics in the 1950’s and rap music in the 2000’s), for fear that they will watch or read sexual or violent behavior and will then act them out themselves.
  • 5. Passive Audience Theory The Passive audience Theory is connected to the Hypodermic syringe theory in that they believe the audience is ‘passive’ recipient of media output. Passive theories tend to see the audience behavior as directly affected by media content and theorists are connected to measure these effects, particularly with regard to the effects of media portrayals of sex and violence. (Source: AS/A2 Media Studies, David Probert, Page 110)
  • 6. Active audience theory and Postmodernism/pluralism Any of various theories of audience that see the audience as active participants in the process of decoding and making sense of media texts. In active theories, the beliefs, values, social and educational background and life experience audience bring to a text are seen as influencing the way they accept, negotiate, or challenge the preferred reading. Basically, they audience are free to develop their own interpretation. (Source: AS/A2 Media Studies, David Probert, Page 2) Links to Pluralism: This theory links to pluralism as they also believe the audience are free to have their own views and that the media do not affect their opinion. Links to Postmodernism: Active audience theory links to Post modern texts as they tend not to have embedded ideology therefor are not patronising to an audience and allow them to develop their own interpretations.