This candidate with number 4103101 has passed several professional examinations from CPA organizations: - Common Final Examination in September 2016 with an overall pass in both days - Assurance examination in September 2015 with an overall pass - Core 1 examination in November 2014 with an overall pass - Core 2 examination in March 2015 with an overall pass - Taxation examination in December 2015 with an overall pass The candidate demonstrated strengths in financial reporting, audit and assurance, management accounting, and taxation. For some cases, the candidate did not fully assess the situation or integrate case facts in the analysis. Overall, the candidate has passed all examinations at a competent level or above.

1. CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
EXAM: Common Final Examination - Day 1 - September 2016
OVERALL RESULT: PASS

2. CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
EXAM: Common Final Examination - Days 2 & 3 - September 2016
ROLE: ASSURANCE
OVERALL RESULT: PASS
LEVEL 1
SUFFICIENCY PASS
DECILE RANKING N/A
LEVEL 2
DEPTH IN FINANCIAL REPORTING PASS
DEPTH IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING PASS
LEVEL 3
DEPTH IN ROLE PASS
LEVEL 4
BREADTH IN AUDIT AND ASSURANCE PASS
BREADTH IN TAXATION PASS
BREADTH IN STRATEGY AND GOVERNANCE PASS
BREADTH IN FINANCE PASS
BREADTH IN FINANCIAL REPORTING PASS
BREADTH IN MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING PASS
OVERALL PASS
Please consult the Information for Candidates document for the interpretation of your reported results.

3. CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
EXAM: Assurance September 2015
OVERALL RESULT: PASS
PERFORMANCE ON THE OBJECTIVE FORMAT QUESTIONS
16.5% 32.3% 42.7% 8.4%
Overall
Not competent Reaching competent Competent Competent with distinction
X
Your performance
Group performance
PERFORMANCE ON CASE #1
13.0% 30.0% 49.8% 7.1%
Audit and Assurance
Not competent Reaching competent
X
Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
15.2% 15.8% 51.7% 17.3%
Financial Reporting
Not competent Reaching competent Competent
X
Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
Enabling skills - strengths and/or weaknesses you displayed on case #1
- Did not appropriately assess the situation
- Appropriately analyzed the issues
- Did not integrate case facts in your analysis
- Concluded the discussion appropriately
- Clearly communicated within your response

4. PERFORMANCE ON CASE #2
23.6% 21.8% 39.6% 15.0%
Audit and Assurance
Not competent Reaching competent Competent
X
Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
33.2% 32.8% 31.5% 2.5%
Financial Reporting
Not competent Reaching competent
X
Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
9.9% 18.8% 60.6% 10.7%
Finance
Not competent Reaching competent
X
Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
Enabling skills - strengths and/or weaknesses you displayed on case #2
- Appropriately assessed the situation
- Appropriately analyzed the issues
- Integrated case facts in your analysis
- Concluded the discussion appropriately
- Clearly communicated within your response

5. EXAM: Core 1 November 2014
CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
OVERALL RESULT: PASS
PERFORMANCE ON THE OBJECTIVE FORMAT QUESTIONS
Financial Reporting - Blueprint weighting 50-70%
Your performance Competent with distinction
X
CompetentReaching competentNot competent
12.9 %42.2 %30.2 %14.6 %Group performance
Audit and Assurance - Blueprint weighting 10-30%
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
18.5 %46.2 %19.1 %16.3 %Group performance
Taxation - Blueprint weighting 10-20%
Your performance Competent with distinction
X
CompetentReaching competentNot competent
15.1 %49.4 %27.8 %7.7 %Group performance
Finance - Blueprint weighting 0-10%
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
4.7 %36.9 %27.1 %31.4 %Group performance

6. PERFORMANCE ON CASE
Financial Reporting
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
17.2 %18.6 %45.4 %18.8 %Group performance
Audit and Assurance
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
23.6 %50.0 %21.9 %4.6 %Group performance

7. EXAM: March 2015 Core 2 Examination
CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
OVERALL RESULT: PASS
PERFORMANCE ON THE OBJECTIVE FORMAT QUESTIONS
Management Accounting - Blueprint weighting 50-70%
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
6.5 %43.3 %39.3 %11.0 %Group performance
Strategy and Governance - Blueprint weighting 10-30%
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
9.0 %39.8 %45.8 %5.3 %Group performance
Finance - Blueprint weighting 0-10%
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
9.7 %30.5 %53.4 %6.5 %Group performance

8. PERFORMANCE ON CASE
Management Accounting
Your performance Competent with distinction
Competent
X
Reaching competentNot competent
9.5 %52.2 %29.9 %8.5 %Group performance
Strategy and Governance
Your performance Competent with distinctionCompetentReaching competent
Not competent
X
11.6 %47.9 %32.6 %7.9 %Group performance
Finance
Your performance Competent with distinctionCompetentReaching competent
Not competent
X
27.7 %33.9 %17.5 %20.9 %Group performance

9. CANDIDATE NUMBER: 4103101
EXAM: Taxation December 2015
OVERALL RESULT: PASS
PERFORMANCE ON THE OBJECTIVE FORMAT QUESTIONS
6.3% 27.2% 56.8% 9.8%
Overall
Not competent Reaching competent Competent
X
Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
PERFORMANCE ON CASE #1
7.2% 25.6% 51.5% 15.7%
Taxation
Not competent Reaching competent
X
Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
3.9% 38.6% 21.6% 35.9%
Finance
Not competent Reaching competent Competent Competent with distinction
X
Your performance
Group performance
Enabling skills - strengths and/or weaknesses you displayed on case #1
- Appropriately assessed the situation
- Appropriately analyzed the issues
- Integrated case facts in your analysis
- Concluded the discussion appropriately
- Clearly communicated within your response

10. PERFORMANCE ON CASE #2
14.9% 24.9% 53.8% 6.4%
Taxation
Not competent
X
Reaching competent Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
13.7% 49.8% 27.9% 8.6%
Finance
Not competent
X
Reaching competent Competent Competent with distinctionYour performance
Group performance
Enabling skills - strengths and/or weaknesses you displayed on case #2
- Did not appropriately assess the situation
- Did not appropriately analyze the issues
- Did not integrate case facts in your analysis
- Concluded the discussion appropriately
- Clearly communicated within your response