A matter for which Humberside police failed to investigate criminal allegations of malfeasance and fraud involving a false claim made by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) that 10 items of post had been sent to the complainant between 19 December 2013 and 13 December 2016 which the complainant claims never to have received, and believes they were dishonestly constructed later (to cover their tracks) to satisfy enquiries made by the judicial ombudsman (JACO) and an investigation carried out by HMCTS complaints team. Humberside police has been provided with evidence proving criminality beyond reasonable doubt in relation to these issues. The force has brushed aside the allegations and as a consequence the matters have been channelled through the police complaint/appeals process which is dealt with under the Police Reform Act 2002. In every case the Professional Standards Branch (PSB) has improperly dealt with the concerns and as a consequence the complaint has required (where there has been an appeal right) escalating to Humberside Police Appeals Body (HPAB). In all cases relevant to a complaint made to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Humberside police's assistant force solicitor has dealt with the appeal but failed to comply with her statutory duty to enforce compliance with the Police Reform Act 2002 (paragraph 8A Schedule 3) which amounts to nothing less than complicity in Humberside police‘s cover-up of serious criminal wrongdoing carried out by the MoJ and therefore done with intent to pervert the course of justice. From consulting the SRA’s Principles 2011 it would appear that the assistant force solicitor FAILED to: (i) uphold the rule of law and the proper administration of justice contrary to Principle 1 of the SRA Principles 2011 (the “Principles”); (ii) act with integrity contrary to Principle 2 of the Principles, and (iii) behave in a way that maintained the trust the public placed in her and the provision of legal services contrary to Principle 6 of the Principles.