Law report

1. Adv. Dharmender Arya
Chamber No. 156 and 159
Saket Court, New Delhi
-Nupur Thapliyal
-BBA LLB 9th Semester
-02325503515

2. ABOUT THE CHAMBERS
• Practice: Both civil and criminal litigation
• Office Strength: 5 Advocates
• Office timings: 9:30 AM to 6 PM
Daily routine and tasks
Morning Routine
Court Proceedings
Classes on Criminal Procedure
Reading files of cases and preparing notes
Alternative Afternoon Routine

3. DETAILS OF THE WORK DONE
Drafting Assisting Research Classes
Assisted in
drafting bail
application
under Sec 439
CrPC
Assisted in
issuing orders
of a case under
Sec 138 of NI
Act
Extensively
researched on
POCSO Act
Judgments on
testimonies of
deaf and dumb
witnesses
Researched
on withdrawal
symptoms and
side effects of
sleeping pills
Assisted
associates and Sir
to courts
Attending
Court
proceedings and
observing the
functioning of
Court
Assisted Sir in
the Muzzafarpur
Shelter home
trial
Powers of the
IO
Preventive
Measures under
CrPC
Investigation
under POCSO
Act
Corroboration
and evidentiary
value of Child
witness

4. BAILAPPLICATION U/S 439
CRPC
Before the judge
Name of the case
FIR No
Sections involved
Police Station
Accused under custody since
Application u/s 439 Crpc for grant of bail on behalf of the
accused
Sign of Applicant and Counsel
An affidavit in support of the bail format India is also to
be filed along with the main application
A readable copy of the FIR is also to be filed
Bail Bond and surety

5. ORDERS U/S 138 NI ACT
IREDA v. Dhalani Chemicals and Sugars Ltd and Ors.
2019
Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency
Limited (IREDA) engaged in promoting and
developing projects relating to new and renewable
sources of energy
4 Respondents, Accounts showed Insufficient Funds
Previous orders to be sent by registered posts to their
addresses
Prepared different envelopes for each respondent
Filled process fee form (particulars like name of the
case, date of the order, name of the judge, name and

6. MUZZAFARPUR SHELTER HOME
TRIAL
STATE v. BRAJESH THAKUR AND ORS. 2019
 “Balika Grah” was owned by Brajesh Thakur
 Report issued by Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS)
 An FIR was lodged in the case on May 31, 2018 against
Brajesh Thakur and 20 other persons, mainly members/
employees of the shelter home and CWC (Child Welfare
Committee) members of the Bihar State.
 Supreme Court transferred the case to Saket Court in fast
track court of Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) Saurabh
Kulshreshtha.
 March 25 after hearing arguments of the CBI, which had
charge-sheeted 21 people
 Trail started from 3rd April as in camera trial.

7. • Charges under IPC: Sec. 341, 342 323, 326, 354A, 354B,
376D, 120B, 109, 504, 506, 34
• Charges under POCSO Act: Sec. 4, 6, 8, 10, 12
• Charges under JJ Act: Sec. 75 and 85
• Adv. Dharmender Arya Sir represented 5 accused namely:
- Kiran, helper in the shelter home.
- Ramshankar @ Masterji, worker at shelter home
- Ramanuj @ Mamu, worker at shelter home
- Vijay Tiwari, driver of Brajesh Thakur
- Krishan Kumar, helper at shelter home.
• 70 prosecution witnesses
• Heard on a day to day basis
• Monitored by the Supreme Court
• Amicus Curae: Adv. Aparna Bhatt

8. 1
2

9. 3
4
5

10. 7
6
8

11. OBSERVATIONS OF THE TRIAL
• Illegality in the CBI investigation
• Faulty investigation of Bihar Police
• IOs not effective
• Biasness of the judge
• Examination of deaf and dumb girls
• Many evidences were not provided to the accused
counsels beforehand, seizure not questioned by the
judge
• Video recording done by the FSL team, seizures
irrelevant
• No immediate medical examinations of the victim
girls or MLCs done

12. THANK YOU