Emails From Larry To Shelley
•
0 likes•96 views
Ford Shelley returned some items to Larry Birkhead that belonged to the estate of Anna Nicole Smith. Larry sent emails to Ford and Howard K. Stern documenting the returned items and stating that any other items still in Ford's possession should be given to Howard through their attorneys due to pending litigation related to Anna Nicole Smith's estate. Larry said he sent the emails to both Ford and Howard to protect himself and ensure all estate items are returned properly through legal channels.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
10000000038
Frank A. Anderson, an attorney for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), files a notice of appearance and request for electronic notice in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. Anderson certifies that he is a member in good standing of the DC and Eastern District of Wisconsin bars and will submit to this Court's jurisdiction. He requests notice of all matters in the bankruptcy case on behalf of the PBGC.
Marshall v Living Trust Fund status conference
The document is an order from a United States District Court judge rescheduling the status conference date in the case Marshall v. Hilliard, et. al. from June 14, 2010 to December 13, 2010 at 8:30 am. The order stipulates that the new date may need to be changed within 30 days of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on whether to grant certiorari in a related case. If no action is taken by December 6, 2010, the parties must either attend the status conference on December 13 or file another stipulation to continue the date.
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for contempt and sanctions. The court found Susan Brown, the attorney, in contempt for violating a consent order requiring her to turn over all copies of estate property. However, the court did not find Ben Thompson, Brown's former client, in contempt as there was no clear evidence he violated the order. As a sanction, the court ordered Brown to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs for bringing the contempt motion, but no other punitive sanctions. The court also ordered Brown and Thompson to turn over any remaining estate property.
CA Verdicts - incomplete (partial consensus on TWO COUNTS)
This document contains verdicts from a jury trial in Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. The jury found defendant Sandeep Kapoor not guilty on all 10 counts. The jury found defendant Khristine Eroshevich guilty on Counts 1, 3, 7, and 9, and found defendant Howard K. Stern guilty on Count 1. The verdicts specify the charges and time periods for each count.
Stern motion for stay of mandate
This document is a motion for a stay of the mandate pending a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. It was filed by Howard K. Stern on behalf of Vickie Lynn Marshall's estate following the 9th Circuit's denial of rehearing. The motion argues that substantial questions will be presented in the cert petition regarding the scope of bankruptcy courts' power over compulsory counterclaims. It contends the 9th Circuit's new test conflicts with other circuits and Supreme Court precedent. The declaration also asserts the petition raises important issues of bankruptcy practice that require uniformity.
Stern - motion to stay mandate GRANTED
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Howard K. Stern's motion to stay the mandate in the case of Elaine Marshall v. Howard K. Stern pending a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. The case involved the bankruptcy and estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall (aka Anna Nicole Smith).
Stern - Motion for certiorari granted
The Supreme Court granted certiorari for Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of E. Pierce Marshall, limiting the questions to be considered to Questions 1, 2, and 3 in the petition for a writ of certiorari. The case is from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and involves a dispute over the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall.
SCOTUS - NOTICE OF Petition
The Supreme Court clerk notified the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clerk that a petition for a writ of certiorari was filed regarding the case of Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of E. Pierce Marshall. The petition was docketed as case number 10-179 by the Supreme Court on August 5, 2010.
Recommended
10000000038
Frank A. Anderson, an attorney for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), files a notice of appearance and request for electronic notice in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. Anderson certifies that he is a member in good standing of the DC and Eastern District of Wisconsin bars and will submit to this Court's jurisdiction. He requests notice of all matters in the bankruptcy case on behalf of the PBGC.
Marshall v Living Trust Fund status conference
The document is an order from a United States District Court judge rescheduling the status conference date in the case Marshall v. Hilliard, et. al. from June 14, 2010 to December 13, 2010 at 8:30 am. The order stipulates that the new date may need to be changed within 30 days of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on whether to grant certiorari in a related case. If no action is taken by December 6, 2010, the parties must either attend the status conference on December 13 or file another stipulation to continue the date.
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtempt
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for contempt and sanctions. The court found Susan Brown, the attorney, in contempt for violating a consent order requiring her to turn over all copies of estate property. However, the court did not find Ben Thompson, Brown's former client, in contempt as there was no clear evidence he violated the order. As a sanction, the court ordered Brown to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs for bringing the contempt motion, but no other punitive sanctions. The court also ordered Brown and Thompson to turn over any remaining estate property.
CA Verdicts - incomplete (partial consensus on TWO COUNTS)
This document contains verdicts from a jury trial in Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. The jury found defendant Sandeep Kapoor not guilty on all 10 counts. The jury found defendant Khristine Eroshevich guilty on Counts 1, 3, 7, and 9, and found defendant Howard K. Stern guilty on Count 1. The verdicts specify the charges and time periods for each count.
Stern motion for stay of mandate
This document is a motion for a stay of the mandate pending a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. It was filed by Howard K. Stern on behalf of Vickie Lynn Marshall's estate following the 9th Circuit's denial of rehearing. The motion argues that substantial questions will be presented in the cert petition regarding the scope of bankruptcy courts' power over compulsory counterclaims. It contends the 9th Circuit's new test conflicts with other circuits and Supreme Court precedent. The declaration also asserts the petition raises important issues of bankruptcy practice that require uniformity.
Stern - motion to stay mandate GRANTED
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Howard K. Stern's motion to stay the mandate in the case of Elaine Marshall v. Howard K. Stern pending a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court. The case involved the bankruptcy and estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall (aka Anna Nicole Smith).
Stern - Motion for certiorari granted
The Supreme Court granted certiorari for Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of E. Pierce Marshall, limiting the questions to be considered to Questions 1, 2, and 3 in the petition for a writ of certiorari. The case is from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and involves a dispute over the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall.
SCOTUS - NOTICE OF Petition
The Supreme Court clerk notified the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clerk that a petition for a writ of certiorari was filed regarding the case of Howard K. Stern, Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall v. Elaine T. Marshall, Executrix of the Estate of E. Pierce Marshall. The petition was docketed as case number 10-179 by the Supreme Court on August 5, 2010.
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISS
The document is an order from a United States Bankruptcy Court case dismissing an adversary proceeding with prejudice. The order approves a stipulation between the plaintiff Virgie Arthur and defendant Bonnie Gayle Stern to dismiss the adversary proceeding, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court retains jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement of the order.
Bonnie - Stipulation to dismiss
This document is a stipulation to dismiss an adversary proceeding filed in bankruptcy court. It summarizes that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant seeking to prevent discharge of a debt. The case was then stayed pending resolution of a related state court lawsuit. That state court lawsuit was then dismissed. The parties now wish to dismiss the adversary proceeding with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the dismissal.
HKS status report on motion for contempt
This document provides a status report regarding a motion for contempt and sanctions filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Vickie Lynn Marshall's estate against several defendants, including Susan M. Brown and G. Ben Thompson. It summarizes the procedural history of the motion, noting that it has been fully briefed but not yet heard by the court. The parties state they are ready to proceed with a hearing once the court resets it.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismiss
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
Brown Memo re Motion to Dismiss
This document is a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss claims against defendants Susan Brown and The Law Offices of Susan Brown. It argues that (1) claims based on California procedural law cannot be brought in South Carolina court, (2) the relevant California statute only applies to acts occurring in California, and (3) the principle of res judicata bars re-litigating issues already decided in a prior motion for sanctions. The memorandum provides background on the representation of defendant Ben Thompson by Susan Brown and the limited allegations against Brown in the amended complaint.
ORDER - Motion to Dismiss
This order from a district court concerns a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment that has been filed in a civil case. As one of the defendants is representing himself without an attorney, the court directs the clerk to send him materials to explain summary judgment procedure and relevant extracts from Rules 12 and 56. The defendants have 34 days to respond to the motion. The order also provides guidance on the requirements for affidavits submitted in opposition to summary judgment.
Brown - Motion to Dismiss
Defendants Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, P.C. filed a motion to dismiss the allegations directed against them in the First Amended Complaint of the lawsuit Howard K. Stern, as Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, a/k/a Vickie Lynn Smith, a/k/a Vickie Lynn Hogan, a/k/a Anna Nicole Smith vs. Stancil Shelley, et al. The motion argues that the allegations in the First Amended Complaint fail to state a claim against Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, P.C. upon which relief can be granted. The motion was filed on
GBT ANSWER
This document is a court filing with a case number 4:08-cv-02753-TLW-TER that was filed on July 22, 2010 as entry number 135. It contains 11 pages of text but no other discernible information about the contents or purpose of the filing.
Shelleys - 7-19-2010 Answer to 1st amended complaint
This document is an answer filed by defendants Stancil Shelley and Gina Thompson Shelley in response to a first amended complaint. It denies many of the allegations against them, such as wrongfully entering a property and taking property without authorization. It admits some factual allegations, such as names and events, but denies violating any laws or conspiring against the plaintiff. Overall, the document raises various defenses in response to the claims in the first amended complaint.
Bonnie order for hearing rescheduled
(1) This document is an order continuing the status conference in the bankruptcy case of Bonnie Gayle Stern.
(2) The previous status conference was set for July 27, 2010. This order continues the status conference to October 26, 2010 at 10:00 am due to the ongoing related litigation in state court.
(3) No appearance is necessary at the July 27 conference, as it has been continued by this order until October 26, 2010 to allow the state court litigation regarding liability and damages against the debtor to continue.
S Carolina - first amended complaint 7-1-2010
This document appears to be a court filing that spans 59 pages. It includes header information that indicates it was filed on July 1, 2010 as entry number 122 in case 4:08-cv-02753-TLW in the court. However, as the document only includes page numbers and headers, its specific contents or purpose cannot be determined from the information provided.
Bonnie ex.a - 2009 order staying case
This document is an order from a bankruptcy court case staying an adversary proceeding pending resolution of a related state court case. The order schedules a continued status conference in the bankruptcy court for October 6, 2009 and every 90 days thereafter until judgments on liability and damages are issued in the state court case, or until further court order. The parties must submit a joint status report 14 days before each conference.
Bonnie - joint status report 7 13-10
1) The parties submitted a joint status report in accordance with local bankruptcy rules regarding an adversary proceeding between Virgie Arthur and Bonnie Gayle Stern.
2) Discovery is ongoing, with the plaintiff anticipating completion in 8-10 months, while the defendant believes discovery could be completed sooner in 3 months if permitted.
3) The plaintiff estimates needing 10-14 days to present their case at trial plus rebuttal, while the defendant anticipates needing 2 days, with the plaintiff intending to call approximately 12 witnesses and the defendant 3-4 witnesses.
Order Granting Addition Of Susan Brown As Defendant
This order grants the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint to add new parties and factual allegations learned during discovery. The plaintiff seeks to add three individuals ("Doe defendants") identified during depositions as being involved in removing property from the estate. The plaintiff also seeks to add an attorney and her law firm who received estate property from one of the defendants. The only opposition comes from the attorney and law firm, but the court finds that allowing the amendments would not be prejudicial or futile. Therefore, the plaintiff's motion to amend is granted.
Marshall V Marshall 3 19 10
This document provides a summary of a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding a longstanding dispute between the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall. The court is revisiting the case after the Supreme Court determined the Ninth Circuit had construed the probate exception too broadly. The case involves a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall regarding a substantial gift from Vickie Lynn's late husband J. Howard Marshall II. The summary is in 3 sentences:
The Ninth Circuit concludes that the findings of an earlier Texas probate court proceeding regarding J. Howard Marshall II's estate plan and intent should be given preclusive effect. The court also finds that the
Marshall Opinion 3 19 10
This document provides a summary of a court case regarding a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall. The summary discusses the background of the case, including the relationships and estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall, J. Howard Marshall II, and Pierce Marshall. It also notes that the tortious interference claim was adjudicated in bankruptcy court, while a probate court in Texas was simultaneously administering J. Howard Marshall II's estate. The court must determine which ruling should be given preclusive effect.
Cbs Motion Summary Judgment 10 1 09
The document consists of the repeated text "W.ROSESPEAKS.COM" spread over multiple lines without any other words or context provided. It appears to be promoting a website address but provides no other information about the site or its purpose in just three repeated lines of text.
Motion To Set Hearing Scott Joye
This document is a motion filed by attorney R. Scott Joye requesting that the court schedule a hearing for his previously filed motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant G. Ben Thompson. The motion was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in the case of Howard K. Stern v. Stancil Shelley et al. on December 8, 2009 in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina.
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for Sanctions
This document is a motion filed in a civil case in the United States District Court for South Carolina. The motion requests that the defendant G. Ben Thompson be allowed to join the response filed by another defendant, Susan M. Brown, to a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff. The motion states that the allegations in the plaintiff's motion for sanctions are the same against both defendants. The attorney for G. Ben Thompson asks to adopt the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in response to the motion for sanctions.
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on integration of Salesforce with Bonterra Impact Management.
Interested in deploying an integration with Salesforce for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
More Related Content
More from JRachelle
Bonnie -ORDER TO DISMISS
The document is an order from a United States Bankruptcy Court case dismissing an adversary proceeding with prejudice. The order approves a stipulation between the plaintiff Virgie Arthur and defendant Bonnie Gayle Stern to dismiss the adversary proceeding, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court retains jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement of the order.
Bonnie - Stipulation to dismiss
This document is a stipulation to dismiss an adversary proceeding filed in bankruptcy court. It summarizes that the plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant seeking to prevent discharge of a debt. The case was then stayed pending resolution of a related state court lawsuit. That state court lawsuit was then dismissed. The parties now wish to dismiss the adversary proceeding with prejudice, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the dismissal.
HKS status report on motion for contempt
This document provides a status report regarding a motion for contempt and sanctions filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Vickie Lynn Marshall's estate against several defendants, including Susan M. Brown and G. Ben Thompson. It summarizes the procedural history of the motion, noting that it has been fully briefed but not yet heard by the court. The parties state they are ready to proceed with a hearing once the court resets it.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismiss
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
Brown Memo re Motion to Dismiss
This document is a memorandum in support of a motion to dismiss claims against defendants Susan Brown and The Law Offices of Susan Brown. It argues that (1) claims based on California procedural law cannot be brought in South Carolina court, (2) the relevant California statute only applies to acts occurring in California, and (3) the principle of res judicata bars re-litigating issues already decided in a prior motion for sanctions. The memorandum provides background on the representation of defendant Ben Thompson by Susan Brown and the limited allegations against Brown in the amended complaint.
ORDER - Motion to Dismiss
This order from a district court concerns a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment that has been filed in a civil case. As one of the defendants is representing himself without an attorney, the court directs the clerk to send him materials to explain summary judgment procedure and relevant extracts from Rules 12 and 56. The defendants have 34 days to respond to the motion. The order also provides guidance on the requirements for affidavits submitted in opposition to summary judgment.
Brown - Motion to Dismiss
Defendants Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, P.C. filed a motion to dismiss the allegations directed against them in the First Amended Complaint of the lawsuit Howard K. Stern, as Executor of the Estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall, a/k/a Vickie Lynn Smith, a/k/a Vickie Lynn Hogan, a/k/a Anna Nicole Smith vs. Stancil Shelley, et al. The motion argues that the allegations in the First Amended Complaint fail to state a claim against Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown, P.C. upon which relief can be granted. The motion was filed on
GBT ANSWER
This document is a court filing with a case number 4:08-cv-02753-TLW-TER that was filed on July 22, 2010 as entry number 135. It contains 11 pages of text but no other discernible information about the contents or purpose of the filing.
Shelleys - 7-19-2010 Answer to 1st amended complaint
This document is an answer filed by defendants Stancil Shelley and Gina Thompson Shelley in response to a first amended complaint. It denies many of the allegations against them, such as wrongfully entering a property and taking property without authorization. It admits some factual allegations, such as names and events, but denies violating any laws or conspiring against the plaintiff. Overall, the document raises various defenses in response to the claims in the first amended complaint.
Bonnie order for hearing rescheduled
(1) This document is an order continuing the status conference in the bankruptcy case of Bonnie Gayle Stern.
(2) The previous status conference was set for July 27, 2010. This order continues the status conference to October 26, 2010 at 10:00 am due to the ongoing related litigation in state court.
(3) No appearance is necessary at the July 27 conference, as it has been continued by this order until October 26, 2010 to allow the state court litigation regarding liability and damages against the debtor to continue.
S Carolina - first amended complaint 7-1-2010
This document appears to be a court filing that spans 59 pages. It includes header information that indicates it was filed on July 1, 2010 as entry number 122 in case 4:08-cv-02753-TLW in the court. However, as the document only includes page numbers and headers, its specific contents or purpose cannot be determined from the information provided.
Bonnie ex.a - 2009 order staying case
This document is an order from a bankruptcy court case staying an adversary proceeding pending resolution of a related state court case. The order schedules a continued status conference in the bankruptcy court for October 6, 2009 and every 90 days thereafter until judgments on liability and damages are issued in the state court case, or until further court order. The parties must submit a joint status report 14 days before each conference.
Bonnie - joint status report 7 13-10
1) The parties submitted a joint status report in accordance with local bankruptcy rules regarding an adversary proceeding between Virgie Arthur and Bonnie Gayle Stern.
2) Discovery is ongoing, with the plaintiff anticipating completion in 8-10 months, while the defendant believes discovery could be completed sooner in 3 months if permitted.
3) The plaintiff estimates needing 10-14 days to present their case at trial plus rebuttal, while the defendant anticipates needing 2 days, with the plaintiff intending to call approximately 12 witnesses and the defendant 3-4 witnesses.
Order Granting Addition Of Susan Brown As Defendant
This order grants the plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint to add new parties and factual allegations learned during discovery. The plaintiff seeks to add three individuals ("Doe defendants") identified during depositions as being involved in removing property from the estate. The plaintiff also seeks to add an attorney and her law firm who received estate property from one of the defendants. The only opposition comes from the attorney and law firm, but the court finds that allowing the amendments would not be prejudicial or futile. Therefore, the plaintiff's motion to amend is granted.
Marshall V Marshall 3 19 10
This document provides a summary of a court opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding a longstanding dispute between the estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall and E. Pierce Marshall. The court is revisiting the case after the Supreme Court determined the Ninth Circuit had construed the probate exception too broadly. The case involves a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall regarding a substantial gift from Vickie Lynn's late husband J. Howard Marshall II. The summary is in 3 sentences:
The Ninth Circuit concludes that the findings of an earlier Texas probate court proceeding regarding J. Howard Marshall II's estate plan and intent should be given preclusive effect. The court also finds that the
Marshall Opinion 3 19 10
This document provides a summary of a court case regarding a tortious interference claim by Vickie Lynn Marshall against Pierce Marshall. The summary discusses the background of the case, including the relationships and estates of Vickie Lynn Marshall, J. Howard Marshall II, and Pierce Marshall. It also notes that the tortious interference claim was adjudicated in bankruptcy court, while a probate court in Texas was simultaneously administering J. Howard Marshall II's estate. The court must determine which ruling should be given preclusive effect.
Cbs Motion Summary Judgment 10 1 09
The document consists of the repeated text "W.ROSESPEAKS.COM" spread over multiple lines without any other words or context provided. It appears to be promoting a website address but provides no other information about the site or its purpose in just three repeated lines of text.
Motion To Set Hearing Scott Joye
This document is a motion filed by attorney R. Scott Joye requesting that the court schedule a hearing for his previously filed motion to withdraw as counsel for defendant G. Ben Thompson. The motion was filed in the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in the case of Howard K. Stern v. Stancil Shelley et al. on December 8, 2009 in Murrells Inlet, South Carolina.
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for Sanctions
This document is a motion filed in a civil case in the United States District Court for South Carolina. The motion requests that the defendant G. Ben Thompson be allowed to join the response filed by another defendant, Susan M. Brown, to a motion for sanctions filed by the plaintiff. The motion states that the allegations in the plaintiff's motion for sanctions are the same against both defendants. The attorney for G. Ben Thompson asks to adopt the answer filed by Susan M. Brown in response to the motion for sanctions.
More from JRachelle (20)
Shelleys - 7-19-2010 Answer to 1st amended complaint
Shelleys - 7-19-2010 Answer to 1st amended complaint
Order Granting Addition Of Susan Brown As Defendant
Order Granting Addition Of Susan Brown As Defendant
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for Sanctions
Scott Joye Motion For Joinder To Brown Response to Motion for Sanctions
Recently uploaded
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on integration of Salesforce with Bonterra Impact Management.
Interested in deploying an integration with Salesforce for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Prompting language models is hard, while programming language models is easy. In this talk, I will discuss the state-of-the-art framework DSPy for programming foundation models with its powerful optimizers and runtime constraint system.
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
I develop the Ruby programming language, RubyGems, and Bundler, which are package managers for Ruby. Today, I will introduce how to enhance the security of your application using open-source software (OSS) examples from Ruby and RubyGems.
The first topic is CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures). I have published CVEs many times. But what exactly is a CVE? I'll provide a basic understanding of CVEs and explain how to detect and handle vulnerabilities in OSS.
Next, let's discuss package managers. Package managers play a critical role in the OSS ecosystem. I'll explain how to manage library dependencies in your application.
I'll share insights into how the Ruby and RubyGems core team works to keep our ecosystem safe. By the end of this talk, you'll have a better understanding of how to safeguard your code.
Main news related to the CCS TSI 2023 (2023/1695)
An English 🇬🇧 translation of a presentation to the speech I gave about the main changes brought by CCS TSI 2023 at the biggest Czech conference on Communications and signalling systems on Railways, which was held in Clarion Hotel Olomouc from 7th to 9th November 2023 (konferenceszt.cz). Attended by around 500 participants and 200 on-line followers.
The original Czech 🇨🇿 version of the presentation can be found here: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/hlavni-novinky-souvisejici-s-ccs-tsi-2023-2023-1695/269688092 .
The videorecording (in Czech) from the presentation is available here: https://youtu.be/WzjJWm4IyPk?si=SImb06tuXGb30BEH .
Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing.pdf
Read Taking AI to the Next Level in Manufacturing to gain insights on AI adoption in the manufacturing industry, such as:
1. How quickly AI is being implemented in manufacturing.
2. Which barriers stand in the way of AI adoption.
3. How data quality and governance form the backbone of AI.
4. Organizational processes and structures that may inhibit effective AI adoption.
6. Ideas and approaches to help build your organization's AI strategy.
Fueling AI with Great Data with Airbyte Webinar
This talk will focus on how to collect data from a variety of sources, leveraging this data for RAG and other GenAI use cases, and finally charting your course to productionalization.
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Simplify your search for a reliable Python development partner! This list presents the top 10 trusted US providers offering comprehensive Python development services, ensuring your project's success from conception to completion.
Webinar: Designing a schema for a Data Warehouse
Are you new to data warehouses (DWH)? Do you need to check whether your data warehouse follows the best practices for a good design? In both cases, this webinar is for you.
A data warehouse is a central relational database that contains all measurements about a business or an organisation. This data comes from a variety of heterogeneous data sources, which includes databases of any type that back the applications used by the company, data files exported by some applications, or APIs provided by internal or external services.
But designing a data warehouse correctly is a hard task, which requires gathering information about the business processes that need to be analysed in the first place. These processes must be translated into so-called star schemas, which means, denormalised databases where each table represents a dimension or facts.
We will discuss these topics:
- How to gather information about a business;
- Understanding dictionaries and how to identify business entities;
- Dimensions and facts;
- Setting a table granularity;
- Types of facts;
- Types of dimensions;
- Snowflakes and how to avoid them;
- Expanding existing dimensions and facts.
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
ここ3000字までしか入らないけどタイトルの方がたくさん文字入ると思います。
Project Management Semester Long Project - Acuity
Acuity is an innovative learning app designed to transform the way you engage with knowledge. Powered by AI technology, Acuity takes complex topics and distills them into concise, interactive summaries that are easy to read & understand. Whether you're exploring the depths of quantum mechanics or seeking insight into historical events, Acuity provides the key information you need without the burden of lengthy texts.
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Consult the full report at https://www.oecd.org/digital/oecd-artificial-intelligence-review-of-germany-609808d6-en.htm
5th LF Energy Power Grid Model Meet-up Slides
5th Power Grid Model Meet-up
It is with great pleasure that we extend to you an invitation to the 5th Power Grid Model Meet-up, scheduled for 6th June 2024. This event will adopt a hybrid format, allowing participants to join us either through an online Mircosoft Teams session or in person at TU/e located at Den Dolech 2, Eindhoven, Netherlands. The meet-up will be hosted by Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e), a research university specializing in engineering science & technology.
Power Grid Model
The global energy transition is placing new and unprecedented demands on Distribution System Operators (DSOs). Alongside upgrades to grid capacity, processes such as digitization, capacity optimization, and congestion management are becoming vital for delivering reliable services.
Power Grid Model is an open source project from Linux Foundation Energy and provides a calculation engine that is increasingly essential for DSOs. It offers a standards-based foundation enabling real-time power systems analysis, simulations of electrical power grids, and sophisticated what-if analysis. In addition, it enables in-depth studies and analysis of the electrical power grid’s behavior and performance. This comprehensive model incorporates essential factors such as power generation capacity, electrical losses, voltage levels, power flows, and system stability.
Power Grid Model is currently being applied in a wide variety of use cases, including grid planning, expansion, reliability, and congestion studies. It can also help in analyzing the impact of renewable energy integration, assessing the effects of disturbances or faults, and developing strategies for grid control and optimization.
What to expect
For the upcoming meetup we are organizing, we have an exciting lineup of activities planned:
-Insightful presentations covering two practical applications of the Power Grid Model.
-An update on the latest advancements in Power Grid -Model technology during the first and second quarters of 2024.
-An interactive brainstorming session to discuss and propose new feature requests.
-An opportunity to connect with fellow Power Grid Model enthusiasts and users.
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-and-domino-license-cost-reduction-in-the-world-of-dlau/
The introduction of DLAU and the CCB & CCX licensing model caused quite a stir in the HCL community. As a Notes and Domino customer, you may have faced challenges with unexpected user counts and license costs. You probably have questions on how this new licensing approach works and how to benefit from it. Most importantly, you likely have budget constraints and want to save money where possible. Don’t worry, we can help with all of this!
We’ll show you how to fix common misconfigurations that cause higher-than-expected user counts, and how to identify accounts which you can deactivate to save money. There are also frequent patterns that can cause unnecessary cost, like using a person document instead of a mail-in for shared mailboxes. We’ll provide examples and solutions for those as well. And naturally we’ll explain the new licensing model.
Join HCL Ambassador Marc Thomas in this webinar with a special guest appearance from Franz Walder. It will give you the tools and know-how to stay on top of what is going on with Domino licensing. You will be able lower your cost through an optimized configuration and keep it low going forward.
These topics will be covered
- Reducing license cost by finding and fixing misconfigurations and superfluous accounts
- How do CCB and CCX licenses really work?
- Understanding the DLAU tool and how to best utilize it
- Tips for common problem areas, like team mailboxes, functional/test users, etc
- Practical examples and best practices to implement right away
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
Webinar Recording: https://www.panagenda.com/webinars/hcl-notes-und-domino-lizenzkostenreduzierung-in-der-welt-von-dlau/
DLAU und die Lizenzen nach dem CCB- und CCX-Modell sind für viele in der HCL-Community seit letztem Jahr ein heißes Thema. Als Notes- oder Domino-Kunde haben Sie vielleicht mit unerwartet hohen Benutzerzahlen und Lizenzgebühren zu kämpfen. Sie fragen sich vielleicht, wie diese neue Art der Lizenzierung funktioniert und welchen Nutzen sie Ihnen bringt. Vor allem wollen Sie sicherlich Ihr Budget einhalten und Kosten sparen, wo immer möglich. Das verstehen wir und wir möchten Ihnen dabei helfen!
Wir erklären Ihnen, wie Sie häufige Konfigurationsprobleme lösen können, die dazu führen können, dass mehr Benutzer gezählt werden als nötig, und wie Sie überflüssige oder ungenutzte Konten identifizieren und entfernen können, um Geld zu sparen. Es gibt auch einige Ansätze, die zu unnötigen Ausgaben führen können, z. B. wenn ein Personendokument anstelle eines Mail-Ins für geteilte Mailboxen verwendet wird. Wir zeigen Ihnen solche Fälle und deren Lösungen. Und natürlich erklären wir Ihnen das neue Lizenzmodell.
Nehmen Sie an diesem Webinar teil, bei dem HCL-Ambassador Marc Thomas und Gastredner Franz Walder Ihnen diese neue Welt näherbringen. Es vermittelt Ihnen die Tools und das Know-how, um den Überblick zu bewahren. Sie werden in der Lage sein, Ihre Kosten durch eine optimierte Domino-Konfiguration zu reduzieren und auch in Zukunft gering zu halten.
Diese Themen werden behandelt
- Reduzierung der Lizenzkosten durch Auffinden und Beheben von Fehlkonfigurationen und überflüssigen Konten
- Wie funktionieren CCB- und CCX-Lizenzen wirklich?
- Verstehen des DLAU-Tools und wie man es am besten nutzt
- Tipps für häufige Problembereiche, wie z. B. Team-Postfächer, Funktions-/Testbenutzer usw.
- Praxisbeispiele und Best Practices zum sofortigen Umsetzen
Recently uploaded (20)
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...
Salesforce Integration for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions A...
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Programming Foundation Models with DSPy - Meetup Slides
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Energy Efficient Video Encoding for Cloud and Edge Computing Instances
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
Introduction of Cybersecurity with OSS at Code Europe 2024
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
Your One-Stop Shop for Python Success: Top 10 US Python Development Providers
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
みなさんこんにちはこれ何文字まで入るの？40文字以下不可とか本当に意味わからないけどこれ限界文字数書いてないからマジでやばい文字数いけるんじゃないの？えこ...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Deep Dive: AI-Powered Marketing to Get More Leads and Customers with HyperGro...
Nordic Marketo Engage User Group_June 13_ 2024.pptx
Nordic Marketo Engage User Group_June 13_ 2024.pptx
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
HCL Notes and Domino License Cost Reduction in the World of DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
HCL Notes und Domino Lizenzkostenreduzierung in der Welt von DLAU
Emails From Larry To Shelley
- 1. 4:08-cv-02753-TLW Date Filed 08/04/2008 Entry Number 1-6 Page 1 of 2 From: Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 8:18 AM To: Ford Shelley Subject: Re: Fwd: Ford, You don't need to write and tell me what I said or what you claim I said. My reason for writing you was that I have a responsibility to the estate to return anything that was given to me. For both of our protection, since I do not have the authority to receive items I felt it was necessary to correspond with those responsible for making sure that all items are returned to the estate, in this case it is Howard. I am sure that is the same reason that you took pictures of the items you returned. So that you and I do not get into an argument about this and other matters it is probably best that you turn over the things you said you would give me later that you still have to Howard through the attorneys you both have retained. That way I can focus on being a dad and regaining my health. I am glad everyone got to see the baby and hope that we can talk about things in the future other than legal matters, as you know I asked you to come see the baby long before you ever mentioned bringing those items to me and I also told you to come see the baby even without bringing those items. The items you returned were not a condition of you and your family coming here to see me and Dannielynn. Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device Original Message- From: __ _ _ Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 06:46:57 To: 9BIWBBMHHH^ Subject: Re: Fwd: I forgot to say that u did send me an instant message around 8 or so the nite before we came and told me what howard stated. You then asked me to call u and I did. U told me to bring it if I wanted to that u just wanted us to come up. We love you all and hope this will be resolved soon. We have faith that u will do what u said and it will be done. Love to all Sent via BlackBerry from SunCom Wireless Original Message- From: Date: Wed, 23 May 2007 00:01:58 To:1 Subj ect: Fwd: Ford, I am sending you as well as Howard, an attachment (including photographs) of the complete list of items that you delivered to me today in Louisville, Kentucky. Even though I informed you that the items should be returned through the attorneys (from yours to the estate) because of the pending litigation, I will forward the items you delivered so that they can be marked off of the list of outstanding items still missing that belong to the estate. Thanks, REDACTED
- 2. 4:08-cv-02753-TLW Date Filed 08/04/2008 Entry Number 1-6 Page 2 of 2 Larry Original Message From: To: Sent: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:35 pm AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at <http://www.aol.com/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000437> A0L.com.