2. Goals of presentation
Highlight the shift towards competence
based education for ESD, the challenge that
this places for teachers and teacher
education and recommendations for moving
forwards
ESD – Education for Sustainable Development
Competence and Competency
2
3. Aim of ESD
Dynamic concept that encompasses a new vision of
education that seeks to empower people of all ages
to assume responsibility for creating and enjoying a
sustainable future (UNESCO 2002).
Pursuing SD through education requires educators
and learners to reflect critically on their own
communities, identify non-viable elements in their
lives and explore tensions between conflicting
values and goals.
3
4. Thinking time
Kinder Surprise Egg- Global phenomenon
Framing the challenges of teacher education in
ESD?
Clarke (2012) ecological blindness and urban
industrialism
Model: take, make and dump
Conceived as a disposable commodity – start to
finish and waste is globally transmitted
4
5. What is wrong with Kinder Surprises?
• Aluminium wrapper – Australia
• Chocolate- Ghana?
• Plastic casing and toy – China
• Set of instructions varies
One Kinder egg is benign but globally a huge pile of toxic
waste
One poorly educated learner adds a lifetime of human toxicity
Its no excuse to claim we don’t know what we were doing.
5
6. Current Teacher Education Programs
• Curriculum shaped by school curriculum and
thus focuses on knowledge and skills;
• Connected to requirements for teacher
certification;
• Often prescribed by government;
• Curriculum and assessment practices are
developed alongside each other.
6
7. Competence Approach
Lack of relevance of current education provision
and the need to produce change agents.
Competences been around since 1980s in
education mostly vocational- however in ESD it
rarely refers to the ability to do a particular activity
to a pre-determined and prescribed standard- ESD
needs to be much more flexible.
Sleurs (2008) Competence approach asks not what
should be taught, but what should be learned,
what abilities for acting, which concepts and
problem-solving strategies should we have
7
8. Competences for Sustainability
2012 – UNECE (United Nations
Economic Commission for Europe).
Defined competences for ESD- of significant
relevance to teacher educators worldwide and
major contribution to United Nations Decade for
Sustainable Development.
prepare general recommendations for policy
makers
define a range of core competences in ESD for
educators.
8
9. Framework of Competences
Learning to know. For ESD the educator should know…….
Learning to do. For ESD the educator should be able
to………
Learning to be. For ESD the educator should be………….
Learning to live and work together. For ESD the educator
should live and work with others in a way which………….
9
11. Areas of focus
• Critical thinking and acting ethically for
transformation;
• Shifting perspectives in time, space, culture
and discipline;
• Dealing with risk and uncertainity on a journey
towards shared and positive futures;
• Effectively facilitating learning.
Where are the challenges for teachers and
teacher education?
11
12. Initiatives in Canada
12
There is modest but promising progress
toward reorienting teacher education to
address education for sustainable
development.
Key drivers and enablers- individual champions,
as well as partnerships and collaboration with
other departments on campus and with education
faculties at other institutions. Key barriers and
challenges include communication gaps within
faculties, competing interests and priorities within
faculties, funding challenges, and lack of
professional development opportunities.
Commensurate
with McKeown and Hopkins 2005
Guidelines and Recommendations for
Reorienting Teacher Education to Address
Sustainability
14. Recommendations
Need to develop and design new pedagogies
“next practices” to help us address a continually changing
landscape of ESD. Sustainability is not static……will need to
evolve with changing need and emphases (Stir, 2004)
Education is perfectly placed to create conditions for
innovative and imaginative solutions but a total
transformation of schools and education is needed.
However we need to simplify in order to get teacher ‘buy in’.
ESD competences need to be aligned with current curricula
be flexible and need to be locally based.
We need to develop mechanisms by which we can measure
achievements and progression.
14
15. Perils of education for ESD
Education can also play the opposite role:
deadening curiosity and innovation;
encouraging acceptance of unsustainable living
as being normal; and teaching learners to
passively wait for others to take action. From a
sustainable development perspective, then,
education is both a great hope and a great
danger ( UNESCO 2013- advanced copy
“Empowering educators for a sustainable
future”
15
16. References
Clarke, P. ( 2012) Education for Sustainability:Becoming Naturally Smart.
Routledge:London.
Council of Ministers of Education Canada (2012) Education for Education for
Sustainable Development in Canadian Faculties of Education. Toronto.
Sleurs, W. ( Ed) (2008) Competences for ESD Education for Sustainable
Development) teachers. Comenius, Brussels. www.csct-project.org.
McKeown R. and Hopkins, C. 2005. Guidelines and Recommendations for
Reorienting Teacher Education to Address Sustainability
Mochizuki, Y and Fadeeva, (2010). Competences for Sustainability and
Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher
Education, 11, p 391-403.
Sleurs, W( ed) ( 2008) www.ensi.org/Projects/Teacher_Education/CSCT/.
UNECE, (2012) Learning for the Future. Competences in Education for
Sustainable Development. www.unece.org/env
UNESCO (2002)Education for Sustainability-From Rio to
Johannesburg:Lessons Learnt from a Decade of Commitment.
Wiek, A., Withycombe L. & Redman C.L ( 2011). Key competences in
sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development.
Sustainability Science 6, p203-218.
16
I think this poses the biggest challenges that we have and we urgently need to be exploloring :next practice”
There are thus some tensions that arise from these statements, first of all ESD suggests a new vision of education – so my question would be how has is education changing as we come to the close of the decade of ESD changed – where are the new practices in education?
Secondly as ESD suggests a participatory and action –orientated approach.
Since ESD has become a priority there has been a surge of research and development in education systems worldwide and the research team here in Cyprus is generating some very valuable recommendations for teacher education. It is clear from the research that the current provision of education through knowledge and skills is not sufficient to bring about about the changes required in society,
The kinder surprise is oe of the most successfully commercial childrens confectionary – originated in 1973,
Banned in USA and in Europe become a collectors item in adults. an example of one of sustainabilitie’s biggest challenges- that is global consumerisation.
The whole concept is based one immediate throw away – take make and dump
ESD is about challenging and deconstructing the consumerist society in developed counries. I appreciate that in developing countries the Kinder surprise is not an issue and ESD will focus much more on traditional and indigenous knowledge and values as important resourses for achieving SD.
Why do people buy them – it’s a common marketing strategy – BOGOF- essentially because purchases do not fulfil the expectations of the buyer- does not live up to the dream – there are many philsophical musings about the kinder egg but I have chosen it today as a way of grabbing your attention about what we need to do as educators to move to a sustainable future.
Making decisions about purchasing a kinder egg – what do we do as teachers. Do we say Kinder eggs are banned- no we cant do that – Sustainability education should not push a moral agenda and must resist simple dogmatic thinking. We have many examples of where this has not worked. However we need to articulate that a change is necessary and that students should develop the skills and knowledge necessary to work for the change. In addition we as sustainability educators do not prescribe a list of practices that lead to the right outcome but we should be a set of iterative questions that require students to grapple with unsustainable situations and move towards more sustainable solutions.
We need to connect values, understanding and action. How do we do that – not just a check list for a teacher to tick off- there are serious challenge for us to move forward.
Would providing knowledge about the component parts do that ? No
We can see from this very seemingly innocuos example that the challenge of ESD is significant. ESD is stated to be a new vision of education.
Providing knowledge and skills for centuries- and this does not work so what is new?
After all that’s what they are going to teach. Little flexibility in some countries yet in other a great deal of freedom within the classroom into what we would say is the lived curriculum.
Whichever country you work in there was clear consensus internationally that current curricula were not equipped to address the global challenges we are facing,\=
However all is not rosy- whilst we have seen a big shift there are some who contest this approach – inadequate interpretation of the competence approach.
These competences are based on International Commission for Education for 21st Century report.
I would ask you to follow up the reference of this report for the details.
There are many challenges with these competences- will they be seen as a check list – how will we assess them?
Will teachers just see them as additions to an already long list of things they need to do in the classroom.
However the good thing is that it focuses on learning rather than teaching.- learner centred pedagogy.
Therefore, it proposed that a starting point for engaging with the Competences would be for people to translate them, not just into their own language, but into words and examples that made sense in their own circumstances. In that way, it was seen that the Competences were not intended to be a definitive statement on the capabilities required for educators, but instead were thought of as a contribution to a conversation and a debate that would take on a life of its own. A big criticism of these competence framwork is that as it was prepared for policy makers it is difficult for teachers to translate into classroom practices so some work needs to be done on that translation.
Tinkering with teacher education curriculum and school curriculum will have little impact- need to “ go big or go home”