SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
1
JOINT COMBAT OUTPOST
QUICK REACTION TEST
Mr. Haran Levenberg
Project Lead
Joint Combat Outpost
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
2
AGENDA
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEM STATEMENT
TASK ORG
TIMELINE
MILESTONES
CHAPTER OUTLINE
TESTING
FINAL PRODUCT
SUMMARY
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
3
Problem Statement
Joint Combat Outposts (JCOPs) used in Iraq to operationally
execute counterinsurgency doctrine expose deployed forces to
unacceptable risks from complex attacks with large VBIEDS and
small arms fire.
Mission
The mission of the JCOP QRT is to develop a chapter that will
solve a subset of protective construction issues to reduce the risk
of death and injury from attacks against combat outposts in OIF
and OEF operations.
JOINT COMBAT OUTPOST
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
4
ARMY JOINT TEST AND EVALUATION
Mr. Haran
Levenberg
JCOP
Project
Lead
Mr. Ernie
Isensee
Director
JT&E
MAJ John
Wilson
Project
Operations
Officer
ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING JCOP
CENTCOM ATEC
JOINT STAFF
Contract Support Staff
ERDCJERRY LOVE
Contract Lead
DAVID COLTHARP
Analyst
LEWIS ECHOLS
Analyst
CAROL JOHNSON
Test Designer
EGLIN AF BASE
US Army Corps of
Engineers/Engineer R&D Center
(USACE/ERDC)
Title: Joint Combat Outpost (JCOP) QRT
Title: Joint Combat Outpost (JCOP) QRT
Lead-Service OTA: ATEC
Advocate Organization: CENTCOM, JCS
J34 Deputy Director for
Antiterrorism/Homeland Defense
Nominating Organization: Army Test and
Evaluation Command (ATEC)
Task Organization
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
5
JCOP Timeline
Suspense for questionnaire April 30
Layout of chapter May 8
PMP complete May 30
JWAG May 27
Final Destructive Testing (Sims)
Final Test design review June 10
JWAG June 26
1
Draft of JCOP chapter July 25
Destructive Test 2, July 30
JWAG September 10th
Staffing to J34 and CENTCOM Sept. 15th
Final JWAG Oct. 21st
Final Distribution to Field Nov. 30th
1
2
21
3
3
4
4
5
5
2
2
6
6
7
7
3
3
4
4
8
81
9
9
= Milestone
= JWAG (Joint Warfare
Advisory Group)
APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
10
JCOP Chapter Outline
(Draft)
1. INTRO
2. JCOP RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
3. ANALYZE MISSION
4. SITE SELECTION
5. IDENTIFY and LIST JCOP VULNERABILITIES
6. ANALYZE and ASSESS THE THREAT
7. DEVELOP CONTROLS/ CONOPS
8. MITIGATE RISK-RISK REDUCTION
9. JCOP CHECKLIST FOR SUCCESS
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
11
TESTINGTESTING
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
12
• Vehicle Barrier data
•Department of State Certified Anti-Ram Vehicle Barriers
•U.K. Transportation Research Lab tests of soil bins and
concrete barriers
•USAF Force Protection Battle Lab tests of soil bins
•Manufacturer tests of soil bins
• Blast tests of Perimeter Walls
•Department of State (DOS) perimeter wall tests (data, reports)
•Army Engineer R&D Center (ERDC) tests of soil bin walls
(Hescos, Metalith, CBP)
•Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) test of soil bin wall (Metalith)
•U.K. test of soil bin wall
• Blast tests of building walls and retrofits/upgrades
•ERDC and AFRL test of polymer retrofits for masonry walls
•DOS tests of embassy wall retrofits
•Database program on blast tests of masonry wall response
(various agencies)
Example Existing Data
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
13
Damage to buildings from truck bomb at COP Inman,
Mosul, 23 March 2008
Modeling Blast Effects
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
14
Example Test Issue
• Can the perimeter wall and building upgrade
designs provide protection from a double
VBIED attack?
• MOE: Level of Protection for personnel inside
building
• Data – Building internal blast pressure
• Data – Building wall failure (Yes/No)
• Data – Building wall debris (mass, velocity, distribution)
• MOE: Level of Protection for exposed personnel
(external to building)
• Data – External blast overpressure
• Data – Debris from perimeter walls and dump truck
(mass, velocity, distribution)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
15
Test Concept
• OBJECTIVE: Evaluate design concepts for mitigating
the effects of a double vehicle bomb attack against a
JCOP
• TEST ARTICLES:
• Perimeter barrier wall system
• Blast upgrade system for building wall
• Conduct two sequenced static detonations of 4000 lb
(TNT EQ) in dump trucks
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
16
Test Concept (cont.)
Double wall perimeter for stopping
double attack
Upgraded building for
blast protection
Retrofit Walls
Blast
ShieldsStandoff
5 ton dump truck with 4000
lbs pulls up to first wall and
detonates
Standoff
Second dump truck
attempts to ram second
wall and detonates
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
5’-50’ 3’-5’
Outside
COP
Inside
COP
CONCEPT A – Low Wall/Low Wall
5’-50’ 3’-5’
Outside
COP
Inside
COP
CONCEPT C – High Wall/Low Wall
5’-50’
Outside
COP
Inside
COP
CONCEPT B – Low Wall/High Wall
5’-50’
9’-15’
Outside
COP
Inside
COP
CONCEPT D – High Wall/High Wall
9’-15’
9’-15’
3’-5’
Basic Concepts for Double Wall
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
18
16’
60’
20’-30’
40’ - 50’
5’ 7’7’
Concept for testing two different
wall configurations with first
detonation
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
19
First barrier
marks edge
of perimeter approach
zone and serves
as warning line
(Hescos, Metalith,
Jersey)
Second barrier
provides capability to stop
second vehicle attack
and seals approach around
crater (Hescos, Metalith, top
container may not be
desired or necessary)
4’
20’ – 30’
40’- 50’
7’
4.5’
9’
3.5’
(?)
~16’
Second barrier provides
stopping capability. Test
will provide data for
decision and placement
(Hescos, Metalith), top
container may not be
desired or necessary)
4’
12’
9’
First barrier
marks edge
of perimeter
approach
zone and stops
fragments from
truck
EXAMPLE
CONCEPT A
EXAMPLE
CONCEPT B
Concept for testing two different
wall configurations (cont)
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
Charge
1
Charge
2
CraterfromCharge1
Site Layout
Free Field Pressure Gages
Internal Pressure Gages
Reaction Structure
for Masonry Walls
Reaction Structure
for masonry walls
Deflection Gages
Hard Mounted Accelerometers
FF1 FF2 FF4 FF5
FF3
Reflected Pressure Gages
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT Reaction Structure for testing
Masonry Wall Response
Wall Size: (h x w)
Bay 2 – 112” x 176”
176"
112"
136"
Std CMU block 7.625" x 7.625" x 15.625"
0.375
1.25
88 88
4.0625 16
0.375 1"
136”
192”
BAY 4
IPB
PC PE
DB AB
Hard Mounted Accelerometers
Internal Pressure Gages
Blast Pressure Gages
Deflection Gage
TYPICAL INSTRUMENTATION
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
Definition: Levels of Protection
High – Minimal building damage, facility
immediately operable, only superficial injures
are likely
Medium – Minor building damage, could be
repaired, facility operable after cleanup and
repair, minor to moderate injuries, fatalities
unlikely
Low – Moderate building damage, facility
unusable, moderate to severe injuries,
fatalities unlikely
Very Low – Heavy building damage, facility
unusable, serious injuries, potential fatalities
Corresponding wall damage
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
Modeling of Blast Effects of existing
COP using AT Planner Software
350 Foot Contour– Onset of wall
collapse for typical building
Truck bomb inside perimeter
Typical building, walls blown in,
partial collapse
Single perimeter wall
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
Truck bomb outside perimeter
140 Foot Contour – Onset of wall
collapse for upgraded building
Double perimeter wall
Building with
protective upgrades,
moderate to heavy damage
Modeling of Blast Effects for upgraded COP using
AT Planner Software
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
25
Example Data Collection
High-speed camera for measuring
perimeter wall debris velocity and distribution
Collection of mass and distribution of debris
310 fps
High-speed camera behind building wall
(inside test structure)
Time, msec
Pressure,psi
Impulse,psi-sec
Measurement P1-W2
0 30 60 90 120 150
-15 -0.06
0 0
15 0.06
30 0.12
45 0.18
60 0.24
75 0.3
Data from blast overpressure gauge
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
26
Final Product
1. Test data to continue
improvement of force protection
initiatives.
2. Distribution of initial handbook
for theater
3. Incorporate as a chapter in JCOB
in future publications
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
27
Summary
Develop and test optimized defensive TTP’s to reduce
the risk to forces occupying JCOPs.
The psychological benefit includes increased morale
for soldiers knowing that their location is safer than it
was previously.
The expected benefits to the warfighter are a
survivable combat outpost with protective construction
that reduces the risk of combat injuries and death.
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008
JT&E
QRT
JT&E
QRT
28
Questions

More Related Content

Similar to JWAGMAY272008

Stork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
Stork_Technical_Challenges.pptStork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
Stork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
wixapps
 

Similar to JWAGMAY272008 (20)

IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind LoadIRJET-  Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
IRJET- Progressive Collapse of RCC Structure Due to Earthquake and Wind Load
 
IRJET- Non Destructive Testing of Old R.C.C. Framed Structure
IRJET- Non Destructive Testing of Old R.C.C. Framed StructureIRJET- Non Destructive Testing of Old R.C.C. Framed Structure
IRJET- Non Destructive Testing of Old R.C.C. Framed Structure
 
IRJET - Review on Behavior of Composite Column and Post-Tension Flat Slab in ...
IRJET - Review on Behavior of Composite Column and Post-Tension Flat Slab in ...IRJET - Review on Behavior of Composite Column and Post-Tension Flat Slab in ...
IRJET - Review on Behavior of Composite Column and Post-Tension Flat Slab in ...
 
00-Slides-IEM Course-Site Supervision-Displ Piles-18 Jun 22 - Copy.pdf
00-Slides-IEM Course-Site Supervision-Displ Piles-18 Jun 22 - Copy.pdf00-Slides-IEM Course-Site Supervision-Displ Piles-18 Jun 22 - Copy.pdf
00-Slides-IEM Course-Site Supervision-Displ Piles-18 Jun 22 - Copy.pdf
 
IRJET- Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Buildings wit...
IRJET-  	  Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Buildings wit...IRJET-  	  Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Buildings wit...
IRJET- Comparative Study on Seismic Analysis of Multistorey Buildings wit...
 
Experimental investigation of the crashworthiness performance of laminated co...
Experimental investigation of the crashworthiness performance of laminated co...Experimental investigation of the crashworthiness performance of laminated co...
Experimental investigation of the crashworthiness performance of laminated co...
 
Stork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
Stork_Technical_Challenges.pptStork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
Stork_Technical_Challenges.ppt
 
IRJET- Study of Combined Action of Coupled Tuned Liquid and Mass Damper on Ea...
IRJET- Study of Combined Action of Coupled Tuned Liquid and Mass Damper on Ea...IRJET- Study of Combined Action of Coupled Tuned Liquid and Mass Damper on Ea...
IRJET- Study of Combined Action of Coupled Tuned Liquid and Mass Damper on Ea...
 
Blast Resistant Buildings
Blast Resistant BuildingsBlast Resistant Buildings
Blast Resistant Buildings
 
IRJET- Behavior of RCC Structure with and without Base Isolation for Seismic ...
IRJET- Behavior of RCC Structure with and without Base Isolation for Seismic ...IRJET- Behavior of RCC Structure with and without Base Isolation for Seismic ...
IRJET- Behavior of RCC Structure with and without Base Isolation for Seismic ...
 
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMED VERTICALLY IRREGULAR BUILDINGS
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMED VERTICALLY IRREGULAR BUILDINGSSEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMED VERTICALLY IRREGULAR BUILDINGS
SEISMIC RISK ASSESSMENT OF RC FRAMED VERTICALLY IRREGULAR BUILDINGS
 
7 erakv 3rd seminar_building
7 erakv 3rd seminar_building7 erakv 3rd seminar_building
7 erakv 3rd seminar_building
 
Retro-fitting of Pre-Stressed Concrete Poles Using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Po...
Retro-fitting of Pre-Stressed Concrete Poles Using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Po...Retro-fitting of Pre-Stressed Concrete Poles Using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Po...
Retro-fitting of Pre-Stressed Concrete Poles Using Carbon Fibre Reinforced Po...
 
IRJET- Response of Buildings with and Without Setbacks Subjected to Earthquak...
IRJET- Response of Buildings with and Without Setbacks Subjected to Earthquak...IRJET- Response of Buildings with and Without Setbacks Subjected to Earthquak...
IRJET- Response of Buildings with and Without Setbacks Subjected to Earthquak...
 
4 - Structural Optimization of Offshore Wind Turbines - Petrini
4 - Structural Optimization of Offshore Wind Turbines - Petrini4 - Structural Optimization of Offshore Wind Turbines - Petrini
4 - Structural Optimization of Offshore Wind Turbines - Petrini
 
Seismic Analysis of Fixed Base and Base Isolated RC Buildings Having Diaphrag...
Seismic Analysis of Fixed Base and Base Isolated RC Buildings Having Diaphrag...Seismic Analysis of Fixed Base and Base Isolated RC Buildings Having Diaphrag...
Seismic Analysis of Fixed Base and Base Isolated RC Buildings Having Diaphrag...
 
IRJET- Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (G+4) using ETABS
IRJET- Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (G+4) using ETABSIRJET- Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (G+4) using ETABS
IRJET- Analysis & Design of Reinforced Concrete Building (G+4) using ETABS
 
IRJET- Seismic Performance of RC & Composite Frames with Plan Irregular Confi...
IRJET- Seismic Performance of RC & Composite Frames with Plan Irregular Confi...IRJET- Seismic Performance of RC & Composite Frames with Plan Irregular Confi...
IRJET- Seismic Performance of RC & Composite Frames with Plan Irregular Confi...
 
Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3
Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3
Seismic assessment of buildings accordance to Eurocode 8 Part 3
 
Christian Koch
Christian KochChristian Koch
Christian Koch
 

JWAGMAY272008

  • 1. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 1 JOINT COMBAT OUTPOST QUICK REACTION TEST Mr. Haran Levenberg Project Lead Joint Combat Outpost
  • 2. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 2 AGENDA INTRODUCTION PROBLEM STATEMENT TASK ORG TIMELINE MILESTONES CHAPTER OUTLINE TESTING FINAL PRODUCT SUMMARY
  • 3. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 3 Problem Statement Joint Combat Outposts (JCOPs) used in Iraq to operationally execute counterinsurgency doctrine expose deployed forces to unacceptable risks from complex attacks with large VBIEDS and small arms fire. Mission The mission of the JCOP QRT is to develop a chapter that will solve a subset of protective construction issues to reduce the risk of death and injury from attacks against combat outposts in OIF and OEF operations. JOINT COMBAT OUTPOST
  • 4. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 4 ARMY JOINT TEST AND EVALUATION Mr. Haran Levenberg JCOP Project Lead Mr. Ernie Isensee Director JT&E MAJ John Wilson Project Operations Officer ORGANIZATIONS SUPPORTING JCOP CENTCOM ATEC JOINT STAFF Contract Support Staff ERDCJERRY LOVE Contract Lead DAVID COLTHARP Analyst LEWIS ECHOLS Analyst CAROL JOHNSON Test Designer EGLIN AF BASE US Army Corps of Engineers/Engineer R&D Center (USACE/ERDC) Title: Joint Combat Outpost (JCOP) QRT Title: Joint Combat Outpost (JCOP) QRT Lead-Service OTA: ATEC Advocate Organization: CENTCOM, JCS J34 Deputy Director for Antiterrorism/Homeland Defense Nominating Organization: Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC) Task Organization
  • 5. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 5 JCOP Timeline Suspense for questionnaire April 30 Layout of chapter May 8 PMP complete May 30 JWAG May 27 Final Destructive Testing (Sims) Final Test design review June 10 JWAG June 26 1 Draft of JCOP chapter July 25 Destructive Test 2, July 30 JWAG September 10th Staffing to J34 and CENTCOM Sept. 15th Final JWAG Oct. 21st Final Distribution to Field Nov. 30th 1 2 21 3 3 4 4 5 5 2 2 6 6 7 7 3 3 4 4 8 81 9 9 = Milestone = JWAG (Joint Warfare Advisory Group) APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV
  • 6. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 10 JCOP Chapter Outline (Draft) 1. INTRO 2. JCOP RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS 3. ANALYZE MISSION 4. SITE SELECTION 5. IDENTIFY and LIST JCOP VULNERABILITIES 6. ANALYZE and ASSESS THE THREAT 7. DEVELOP CONTROLS/ CONOPS 8. MITIGATE RISK-RISK REDUCTION 9. JCOP CHECKLIST FOR SUCCESS
  • 7. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 11 TESTINGTESTING
  • 8. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 12 • Vehicle Barrier data •Department of State Certified Anti-Ram Vehicle Barriers •U.K. Transportation Research Lab tests of soil bins and concrete barriers •USAF Force Protection Battle Lab tests of soil bins •Manufacturer tests of soil bins • Blast tests of Perimeter Walls •Department of State (DOS) perimeter wall tests (data, reports) •Army Engineer R&D Center (ERDC) tests of soil bin walls (Hescos, Metalith, CBP) •Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) test of soil bin wall (Metalith) •U.K. test of soil bin wall • Blast tests of building walls and retrofits/upgrades •ERDC and AFRL test of polymer retrofits for masonry walls •DOS tests of embassy wall retrofits •Database program on blast tests of masonry wall response (various agencies) Example Existing Data
  • 9. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 13 Damage to buildings from truck bomb at COP Inman, Mosul, 23 March 2008 Modeling Blast Effects
  • 10. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 14 Example Test Issue • Can the perimeter wall and building upgrade designs provide protection from a double VBIED attack? • MOE: Level of Protection for personnel inside building • Data – Building internal blast pressure • Data – Building wall failure (Yes/No) • Data – Building wall debris (mass, velocity, distribution) • MOE: Level of Protection for exposed personnel (external to building) • Data – External blast overpressure • Data – Debris from perimeter walls and dump truck (mass, velocity, distribution)
  • 11. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 15 Test Concept • OBJECTIVE: Evaluate design concepts for mitigating the effects of a double vehicle bomb attack against a JCOP • TEST ARTICLES: • Perimeter barrier wall system • Blast upgrade system for building wall • Conduct two sequenced static detonations of 4000 lb (TNT EQ) in dump trucks
  • 12. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 16 Test Concept (cont.) Double wall perimeter for stopping double attack Upgraded building for blast protection Retrofit Walls Blast ShieldsStandoff 5 ton dump truck with 4000 lbs pulls up to first wall and detonates Standoff Second dump truck attempts to ram second wall and detonates
  • 13. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 5’-50’ 3’-5’ Outside COP Inside COP CONCEPT A – Low Wall/Low Wall 5’-50’ 3’-5’ Outside COP Inside COP CONCEPT C – High Wall/Low Wall 5’-50’ Outside COP Inside COP CONCEPT B – Low Wall/High Wall 5’-50’ 9’-15’ Outside COP Inside COP CONCEPT D – High Wall/High Wall 9’-15’ 9’-15’ 3’-5’ Basic Concepts for Double Wall
  • 14. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 18 16’ 60’ 20’-30’ 40’ - 50’ 5’ 7’7’ Concept for testing two different wall configurations with first detonation
  • 15. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 19 First barrier marks edge of perimeter approach zone and serves as warning line (Hescos, Metalith, Jersey) Second barrier provides capability to stop second vehicle attack and seals approach around crater (Hescos, Metalith, top container may not be desired or necessary) 4’ 20’ – 30’ 40’- 50’ 7’ 4.5’ 9’ 3.5’ (?) ~16’ Second barrier provides stopping capability. Test will provide data for decision and placement (Hescos, Metalith), top container may not be desired or necessary) 4’ 12’ 9’ First barrier marks edge of perimeter approach zone and stops fragments from truck EXAMPLE CONCEPT A EXAMPLE CONCEPT B Concept for testing two different wall configurations (cont)
  • 16. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT Charge 1 Charge 2 CraterfromCharge1 Site Layout Free Field Pressure Gages Internal Pressure Gages Reaction Structure for Masonry Walls Reaction Structure for masonry walls Deflection Gages Hard Mounted Accelerometers FF1 FF2 FF4 FF5 FF3 Reflected Pressure Gages
  • 17. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT Reaction Structure for testing Masonry Wall Response Wall Size: (h x w) Bay 2 – 112” x 176” 176" 112" 136" Std CMU block 7.625" x 7.625" x 15.625" 0.375 1.25 88 88 4.0625 16 0.375 1" 136” 192” BAY 4 IPB PC PE DB AB Hard Mounted Accelerometers Internal Pressure Gages Blast Pressure Gages Deflection Gage TYPICAL INSTRUMENTATION
  • 18. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT Definition: Levels of Protection High – Minimal building damage, facility immediately operable, only superficial injures are likely Medium – Minor building damage, could be repaired, facility operable after cleanup and repair, minor to moderate injuries, fatalities unlikely Low – Moderate building damage, facility unusable, moderate to severe injuries, fatalities unlikely Very Low – Heavy building damage, facility unusable, serious injuries, potential fatalities Corresponding wall damage
  • 19. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT Modeling of Blast Effects of existing COP using AT Planner Software 350 Foot Contour– Onset of wall collapse for typical building Truck bomb inside perimeter Typical building, walls blown in, partial collapse Single perimeter wall
  • 20. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT Truck bomb outside perimeter 140 Foot Contour – Onset of wall collapse for upgraded building Double perimeter wall Building with protective upgrades, moderate to heavy damage Modeling of Blast Effects for upgraded COP using AT Planner Software
  • 21. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 25 Example Data Collection High-speed camera for measuring perimeter wall debris velocity and distribution Collection of mass and distribution of debris 310 fps High-speed camera behind building wall (inside test structure) Time, msec Pressure,psi Impulse,psi-sec Measurement P1-W2 0 30 60 90 120 150 -15 -0.06 0 0 15 0.06 30 0.12 45 0.18 60 0.24 75 0.3 Data from blast overpressure gauge
  • 22. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 26 Final Product 1. Test data to continue improvement of force protection initiatives. 2. Distribution of initial handbook for theater 3. Incorporate as a chapter in JCOB in future publications
  • 23. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 27 Summary Develop and test optimized defensive TTP’s to reduce the risk to forces occupying JCOPs. The psychological benefit includes increased morale for soldiers knowing that their location is safer than it was previously. The expected benefits to the warfighter are a survivable combat outpost with protective construction that reduces the risk of combat injuries and death.
  • 24. FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO) 5/27/2008 JT&E QRT JT&E QRT 28 Questions