(RIYA)🎄Airhostess Call Girl Jaipur Call Now 8445551418 Premium Collection Of ...
Policy Update:The Affordable Care Act and the Ryan White Program, presented by Matthew McClain
1. Policy Update:
The Affordable Care Act and the
Ryan White Program
Philadelphia EMA Planning Council
August 9, 2012
Presented by Matthew McClain
2. Today’s Topics
Affordable Care Act
Medicaid expansion
Essential Health Benefits
Ryan White Program
FY 2013 Appropriations
Reauthorization
Actions and Resources
August 2012 Policy Update 2
3. Today’s Handouts
1. CAEAR Coalition Comments on the Future of the Ryan
White Program (July 31, 2012)
2. Ryan White Work Group Comments on Next Steps for the
Ryan White Program (July 31, 2012)
3. AIDS Budget and Appropriations Coalition: FY 2013
Appropriations for HIV/AIDS Programs (August 2, 2012)
4. NHeLP 50 Reasons for Medicaid Expansion (August 2,
2012)
5. Urban Institute: Considerations in Assessing State-
Specific Fiscal Effects of the ACA’s Medicaid Expansion
August 2012 Policy Update 3
4. The HIV Health Care Environment
August 2012 AACO Director’s Meeting Federal Policy Update 4
5. Affordable
Care
Act
Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act as amended
by the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act
(March 2010)
National Federation of
Independent Business versus
Sebelius (June 28, 2012)
Policy Update 5August 2012
6. What
Happened
First Supreme Court decision
on ACA
Individual mandate is valid
Insurers must abandon pre-
existing condition exclusions
and lifetime caps on coverage
Essential health benefits
upheld
Curbs the power of Federal
government to enforce the
Medicaid expansion
Policy Update 6August 2012
7. Implications for Medicaid Expansion States
Supreme Court did not
strike the Medicaid
expansion nor make it
optional
Many implementation
questions, some of
which the President
and HHS will address
Federal match will be
100% initially then 90%
(now 57%)
States that expand must
comply with all
mandatory provisions
such as reasonable
promptness and due
process
Policy Update 7August 2012
8. Implications for States Failing to Expand
States that do not
expand must still cover
all individuals under
133% FPL and meet
other ACA and Medicaid
Act requirements
Maintain Medicaid
eligibility criteria and
MAGI as of March 2010
States not allowed to
expand to <138% FPL
and get the ACA match
Uninsured people with
incomes below FPL are
ineligible for health
exchange subsidies
Must extend Medicaid
coverage to low income
children aged 6-19 years
Policy Update 8August 2012
9. Uninsured
Adults with
Incomes
Below 138%
FPL by
Medicaid
Eligibility
Status
Newly Eligible
Currently
Eligible
Total
Eligible
Uninsured
<138%
FPL
<100%
FPL
<138%
FPL
<138%
FPL
US
15.0
million
11.4
million
4.3
million
19.4
million
PA 520,000 398,000 92,000 613,000
NJ 307,000 245,000 42,000 349,000
Source: The Urban Institute Health Policy Center
August 2012 Policy Update 9
10. Reform
Priorities
for People
Living with
HIV/AIDS
and HIV
Advocates
Ensure that a comprehensive
Essential Health Benefits package
Ensure access to essential
services covering the gaps
Ensure smooth transition for
vulnerable populations
Prepare service organizations for
a changing healthcare landscape
Make Medicaid managed care
work for people with HIV
Policy Update 10August 2012
12. Essential
Health
Benefits
Highlights
• Qualified Health Plans offered
through Exchanges
• State Medicaid programs for
newly eligible beneficiaries
• Basic Health Plans for people
between 133%-200% FPL
• No higher premiums based on
health status or gender
• No cost sharing for preventive
services
Policy Update 12August 2012
14. EHB
Package
that Meets
the Care
and
Treatment
Needs of
PLWHA
Unlimited access to antiretroviral
drugs and viral hepatitis
medications
Unlimited access to
HIV/infectious disease specialists
Case management
Mental health and substance
abuse services
Preventive and wellness services
Laboratory testing
Services needed to meet national
standards of HIV care
Policy Update 14August 2012
15. EHB Process By September 28, 2012, States
must tell Federal government
which benchmark plan it
selected and what additions
are needed to meet EHB and
non-discrimination mandates
of ACA
HHS will review the plan to
assure it meets the
requirements
Policy Update 15August 2012
16. Questions
Regarding
EHBs to
Meet the
Needs of
PLWHA
What are the most important
benefits for PLWHA?
Which plans will be
considered?
What benefits do those plans
currently offer?
What are the concerns?
Which plan looks best?
What needs to be added?
Policy Update 16August 2012
17. Ryan
White
Program
Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment
Extension Act of 2009 (Public Law
111-87, October 30, 2009).
First enacted in 1990 as the Ryan
White Comprehensive AIDS
Resources Emergency Act.
Amended and reauthorized 4 times-
1996, 2000, 2006, and 2009
Current law expires in 13 months
but does not sunset, permitting
appropriations and implementation
after September 30, 2013
Policy Update 17August 2012
19. HIV Care
Advocacy
Questions
• What is the future of the Ryan
White Program?
• What will bridge services from the
expiration of RW in 2013 to when
coverage starts in 2014?
• Will RW need to focus on what and
who won’t be covered such as
wrap-around/support services,
undocumented persons, accessing
the new system, and quality?
August 2012 Policy Update 19
20. Ryan
White and
ACA
RWP providers will be
increasingly dependent on 3rd
party payment (51% now to as
much as 80% with ACA)
Number of entirely uninsured
RWP clients should decrease
dramatically
Gaps to be determined will
remain: e.g. uninsured, those not
enrolled, insurance coverage
gaps, ineligibles, HIV prevention
services
Policy Update 20August 2012
21. CAEAR Coalition Guiding Principles for
Reauthorization
Open access to quality health care
Ensure continuity of care
Fortify resources and increase client
capacity
Maintain and strengthen flexibility and
adaptability
August 2012 AACO Director’s Meeting Federal Policy Update 21
26. Local
Activities
to Prepare
for ACA
and Ryan
White
Reauthor-
ization
• Use existing data systems (e.g.,
unduplicated RWP client data
analysis of insurance status)
• Maximize 3rd party billing
• Understand gaps in coverage
• Participate in national and
state advocacy group processes
and decisions (e.g., CAEAR
Coalition and PA Health
Choices Work Group)
August 2012 Policy Update 26
27. Act Now • Improve provider and
organizational knowledge and
skills (e.g., RWP monitoring
standards, Medicaid
participation, patient
navigation, medical case
management)
• Improve consumer knowledge
and skills (e.g., rights,
responsibilities, eligibility,
program navigation)
August 2012 Policy Update 27
28. General Resources
• HealthCare.gov
• WhiteHouse.gov
• HHS.gov
• Families USA
• Urban Institute
• Kaiser Foundation
• National Health
Law Program
• Trust for America’s Health
• National Association of County
and City Health Officials
• Association of State and
Territorial Health Officials
• National Association of
Community Health Centers
• State Healthcare Access
Research Project
August 2012 Policy Update 28
29. HIV-Specific Resources
• AIDS.gov
• Treatment Access
Expansion Project
• Treatment Action Group
• HIVhealthreform.org
• Federal AIDS Policy
Partnership
• CAEAR Coalition
• National Association of
State and Territorial
AIDS Directors
• AIDS United
• HIV Medicine
Association
• Coalition for a National
AIDS Strategy
August 2012 Policy Update 29
SCOTUS accepted the States’ argument at face value without evidence of actual coercion
Since its enactment the Medicaid law has included a provision that allows the Secretary of HHS to deny all or part of a non-compliant State’s federal funding. It has never been used to terminate the entirety of a Status’ funding.
, as argued by Pennsylvania and 25 other States
, ruling it is unduly coercive on the States
Lower courts will be hearing many coercion claims
Example: Expanding coverage of community-based services and supports for people with disabilities and the eldgerly
Example: Expanding coverage of community-based services and supports for people with disabilities and the eldgerly
Example is modified adjusted gross income provisions
Health exchangesa are for people with incomes at or above 100% FPL or individual below 100% FPL who do not qualify for Medicaid due to their immigration status.
SCOTUS accepted the States’ argument at face value without evidence of actual coercion
Since its enactment the Medicaid law has included a provision that allows the Secretary of HHS to deny all or part of a non-compliant State’s federal funding. It has never been used to terminate the entirety of a Status’ funding.
, as argued by Pennsylvania and 25 other States
, ruling it is unduly coercive on the States
Lower courts will be hearing many coercion claims