2. What is the author’s main
argument?
In any language learning, it is unavoudable for
language learners and language teachers to deal
with vocabulary and vocabulary learning that is the
reason why the aim of the present investigation is to
describe types of vocabulary learning strategies
reported employing by undergraduate students
learning English at Rajabhat University.
3. What conclusions are drawn?
In the conclusion part, it is reported that there were
founf 54 idividual vocabulary learning purposes as
well as vocabulary improvement in general. These
strategies were reported employing for vocabulary
not only when inside but also outside class.
4. What evidence does the author put
forward to support the argument
and the conclusion?
Classroom observation
Oral interview
Written Questionnaire
Think aloud
Diary Studies
5. What is your view of this
evidence?
We think that the author was right in the use of those
tools because of the kind of information he was
expecting to obtain.
The research aimed to describe and analyze the types
of vocabulary strategies that students from Rajabhaj
University used.
classroom observations and oral interview took an
important place in the research in order to achieve
the goal.
6. Has the author made any implicit
assumptions about shared believes
which your, the reader, you might
question?
No, the author did not make any implicit assumptions.
Since our point of view, the description of the goals and
objectives were very clear. In addition to this, the
definitions were very clear. The concepts, and the
background. We read and learn about more interesting
things than we expected.
