CAMBRIDGE AS HISTORY: REVISION INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION
1A. Ind Rev & Ec Growth-IMF-2010
1. Economic Growth and the
Industrial Revolution
G. Chris Rodrigo, IMF Research Department
2. Economic growth is
essentially growth of labor
productivity
Real cost of some common food items in
minutes of work 1919 1997
3 pounds of chicken 157 14
3 pounds tomato 101 18
5 pounds sugar 72 10
1 pound ground beef 30 6
½ gallon milk 39 7
1 dozen oranges 68 9
3. How technological change lowers
real cost of consumer durables
Cost in work hours of consumer durables
1911-16 1997
Refrigerator 3162 (1916) 68
Cooker 345 (1910) 22
Dishwasher 140 (1913) 28
Clothes washer 553 (1911) 26
These are clearly enormous productivity gains
4. Measuring - real effective
-economic growth
The economy as a production system
Labor productivity (output/labor input) is the
best measure of economic progress
GDP/capita is the best measure of prosperity
Real growth should be measured as the rate of
growth of GDP/capita (rather than GDP)
Growth of labor productivity is approximately
proxied by the growth of GDP/equivalent adult
which is the slope of GDP/capita against time
5.
6.
7. Economic growth in longer
term perspective (500 years)
Estimates by Maddison provides growth data
from 1500 – 2000
Key turning point: industrial revolution in
Britain from 1750 – 1830
Preceded by two - three centuries of
merchant capitalism in Europe
Followed by spread of industrial capitalism to
USA from around 1850
Germany and USA leap ahead from 1870-90
8.
9. Factors catalyzing the advance of
science and technology in Europe
Portugese advances in navigation and the
breaking of the spice trade monopoly
International trade and the “European
Enlightenment” – triggering effects
The Enlightenment and the rise of science
in Europe – symbiotic evolution
Breaking the stranglehold of theology to
promote advance of scientific thinking
10. What do we know today about
long-term growth ?
Growth is uneven across time and space
Pre-industrial societies were practically
stagnant by contemporary standards
Economic growth accelerates with the onset
of the industrial revolution
Growth is the result of technological change
Benefits of technology are not automatic:
wrenching internal reforms are needed to
capture benefits from existing technology
11. Long-term growth occurs in waves
of technological revolutions
(Carlota Perez, 2002)
From 1771
From 1829
From 1875
From 1908
From 1971
The industrial revolution in Britain
Age of steam and railways; from
Britain to W. Europe and the USA
Age of steel, electricity and heavy
engineering. USA & Germany
lead
Age of oil, automobile and mass
production; from USA to Europe
Age of information technology;
from USA to Europe and Asia
12. International trade from 1750 to
1945 and the rise of imperialism
Pre-industrial trading networks and colonies were
extended to generate larger markets
Trade with colonies was a crucial source of raw
materials and agricultural products
From around 1870 limited industrial activity was
induced in the colonies
But exploitation of colonies (imperialism) held back
technological development in Britain and France
compared to the United States and Germany
13. Decisive political action is sometimes
needed for accelerated catch-up
Peter the Great, Catherine the Great and
the modernization of Russia
The Zollverein and the genesis of Germany
The role of banks in promoting industry in
Germany (institutional substitution)
The Meiji restoration in Japan and the role
of the state in kick-starting industry
14. Alexander Hamilton and the rise
of the USA as an industrial power
Hamilton (in 1791) put forward the following ideas.
• The US needed to become a strong industrial power
to become a first-rank nation, like Britain & France
• A developing nation like the USA could not compete
immediately against industrial might of UK, to match
the low-price and high quality of its manufactures
• US industrial capability has to be built-up steadily
over time through experience in production
• Hence, it is necessary to support domestic industry
and protect domestic markets against imports until
US industrial capability is built up to British levels
• Hamilton’s industrial policies were strongly opposed
by Southern plantation interests and Jefferson
15. Hamilton’s industrial policies for the
promotion of domestic manufactures
Moderate tariffs crafted to protect ‘infant industries’ against imports
Exemption from tariffs for industrial inputs
Prohibitions on exporting raw materials needed by American industry
Promotion of science, technology and innovation through subsidies,
patents and prizes for inventions and immigration of skilled people
Regulation of product standards and inspection of US manufactured
goods to protect consumers and enhance reputation abroad
Building up the physical infrastructure (transportation) and financial
system to support industrial expansion, trade and exports
These policies were opposed by Southern plantation owners, but
became accepted from around 1812, remaining in force until 1945.
US industry advanced rapidly, overtaking Britain and France by
around 1890.
16. Alexander Hamilton (1755-1804)
and Friedrich List (1789-1846)
Hamilton’s policies were adopted by List and implemented
in Germany as well. By 1871 Germany and the USA
began university-based research to support industrial
innovation. By 1890, Germany and the USA had
surpassed Britain in overall labor productivity and
productivity growth as well.
17. Other factors that drove US ascendency
over Western Europe ?
Absence of feudal social institutions promoted faster
evolution of technology
Large internal market led to gains from scale
economies from both production and distribution
Imperialism in Britain and France held back
emergence of modern economic institutions
USA borrowed technology and adopted new ideas
more rapidly than other countries
USA incubated a uniquely entrepreneurial culture
18. Economic change is not automatic –
political action is often necessary
Evolution of social & economic institutions is often forced
Expansion of education and scientific research is often
initiated by the government (Germany, USA, India)
Social structures that block progress need to be broken up
Industrial work tempos and work ethic need to be built up
Wars often accelerate the drive for technological change
Political-economy actions needed for industrial catching-up
Industrial policy used successfully by Japan, Korea, Taiwan
and Singapore, but many more countries that used industrial
policies failed to achieve breakthrough, possibly because
they failed to simultaneously implement other necessary
reforms
Original industrial policies may not work today, because the
rules of trade have changed with the GATT-WTO process
and the much higher complexity of modern industrial
technology
19. Technological change and
economic growth: references
Landes, David S. (1998), The Wealth and Poverty of
Nations, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Maddison, Angus (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist
Development: a Long-run Comparative View, Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
Maddison, Angus (1995), Monitoring the World Economy
1820–1992, Paris: OECD, Development Centre Studies.
Mokyr, Joel (1990), The Lever of Riches: Technological
Creativity and Economic Progress, New York: Oxford
University Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2008) Bad Samaritans: the Myth of
Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism, New
York, Bloomsbury Press.
Editor's Notes
We need some precise definitions of growth measures, level measures and growth rates. In a simple production model, labor and capital are inputs. But for long term growth, capital itself is endogenously produced, so labor is the main exogenous input.
Economic historians have made remarkable progress over the last two decades in unraveling the trajectories of economic growth. Economic growth is clearly the outcome of industrial change through innovation.
The role of international trade preceding the industrial revolution was crucial in advancing independent creativity in knowledge accumulation in Europe. Contact with foreign cultures stimulated radical thinking in every sphere of human activity. The struggle of the Dutch against Imperial Spain & the Reformation are political manifestations of the attempt of European civilization to free itself from the trammels of orthodoxy. These tendencies are then taken forward further by the English Civil War, the American Revolution and the French Revolution.
Note also that in breaking the power of the RC church people did not necessarily give up religion. Most retained their belief in Christian ideas in general, but developed alternative interpretations that were consistent with the scientific spirit. In vast areas of the USA now, large numbers of people are now going back to fundamentalist interpretations of Christian doctrine. That is an interesting problem to think about.
While this lecture is about the role of technology and trade in promoting growth, it is important to note that international trade before 1750 was very different from contemporary trade and associated problems.
Industrial development in Europe and North America widened the disparity between nations, leading to greater trade with colonies and eventually imperialism from around 1870 to 1945. This led to a high level of economic integration based on trade and investment in the colonies.
Forcible integration through the exercise of power by the more powerful nations is not the only way in which laggard nations catch up with the leaders. When recognized in time, economic disparity spurs laggard nations to exert extraordinary efforts to catch up with the leaders. This often involves the forced modernization of social institutions to whip them into forms more conducive to contemporary economic processes. About 300 years ago Peter the Great of Russia pushed through the modernization of his country. Catherine the Great carried this on but was then compelled to backtrack by the ideas spreading out from the French Revolution.
The Zollverein enabled Prussia to dominate over the German states which were linked up in this customs unions and exclude Austria. Then Germany forced through economic modernization with specialists brought over from Britain. Germany also pioneered the link between industry and university research, thereby institutionalizing the progress of innovation. It was quickly copied by the USA around 1870.
With capital markets weakly developed in Germany the banks began to play an active role in promoting industrial activity. Here new institutions were developed to substitute for weak or absent markets. This special role of German banks persists to this day.
The Meiji revolution in Japan carried through a social revolution against feudalism setting the institutions for a modern capitalist society. This process was carried through further under the MacArthur administration after 1945. The state continued to play a guiding role for decades afterwards. The role of the state in guiding economic progress has been strong in South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore, like in many other developing countries after the Second World War. It is just that they were successful with policies oriented towards the world market whereas most other nations focused on the domestic market.
The USA actually invented industrial policy and have used it extensively in the 20th century as well.