t is easy to mistake that the change harbinger is enough because we are not taught to see critically. Why are movies written about women by everyone but them? Why do the prominent hold others back in their progress? Because the current structures teach us that our ideals of contentment and success come at the cost of others. Empathy as a mass emotion holds no ground.https://www.eduminatti.com/category/schools-in-india
2. Opting for gender as it is a closer experience, we would like to
focus on why we must hand on access to platforms of privilege
to the marginalized, over speaking on their behalf, about their
experiences as they watch from the sidelines. Conversations of
social constructs like gender need to be looked at
intersectionality. Academic discourse is infamous for having at
the center stage only straight, male, white voices. A paradigm
shift here needs to make the information young, and
impressionable minds process more representative. many girls
schools in Dehradun teach their students about importance of
women representation.
WWW.EDUMINATTI.COM
3. Writing is always imbued with passion; it relates to our
existence. Hence, even if brilliant and engaging, our stories
will never be honest unless said in the first person. These
narratives are not mere fables; they tell us of a people we will
never live like. Patriarchy is not a symptom, but the system
itself, rotten at its core. It shows that the modern world was
built by the male specimen, to paraphrase Greta Thunberg.
Men cannot write of women because the fact that our
experiences vary astronomically is overlooked. The advances
in feminization have now extended to branches of
persecution; Americans write about poverty, two out of three
of the beggars are now women. I’d be mistaken if I believed
these were the strides we wanted to take as a collective.
And the fact that gender in mainstream conversations is no
longer a binary baffles those protected by the status quo.
‘Trans Lives Matter’ and ‘Gender is a social construct’ is a
sentence every politically aware and charged youngster our
generation will tell you. But are the people we bring to
houses of change listening? Voices in protest will always
come from the forced periphery, and it is our duty as a people
REPRESENTATIO
N
WWW.EDUMINATTI.COM
4. It is easy to mistake that the change harbinger is enough because we are not
taught to see critically. Why are movies written about women by everyone but
them? Why do the prominent hold others back in their progress? Because the
current structures teach us that our ideals of contentment and success come at
the cost of others. Empathy as a mass emotion holds no ground.
Sympathy has often driven artists to create; photographers take pictures of the
ailing in hutments; everyone’s second aunt writes of oppression when our
armed forces are attacked. But this feeling only lends a sense of sociability to
our actions. Regardless of intention, our visualization and persuasion in matters
of the world will always be lacking, as our agency is handicapped, for it is not
originally ours. Like Adam Smith had said, our interest and imagination delude
the right thing to be said. However, unfortunately, the lopsided continues as
these self-styled representatives comment on lives and legacies that are not
their own.
Another thing to add, sympathy is distant; it looks from far away and feels sorry.
This is misplaced for the purposes it seeks to serve. The concern is, more often
than not, egotistical and narrow. This dynamic should not be simplified in terms
of rewarding those who come out on top or labeling those who speak against it
MIS MANIPULATION OF REPRESENTATION
WWW.EDUMINATTI.CO
5. GENDER BIAS
One may argue about the merits of bias, speedy scrutiny, aiding
choice, and target detection; the list will go on for as long as we want
to distract. But this is a thin line when we talk of Oppression Olympics
within an institution as pervasive as this one. Of course, this is a
process of community learning and unlearning, and it is not like the
marginalized sustain themselves on a vendetta. But while that
explains things to an extent, it does not make justification or
reparation. Moving ahead must be about affirmative action.
The intention is too flaky a basis. No statistical power drives this
model, and the heightened tolerability of the damned must not be
condoned. Write and write of lives you have not lived, not for them.
Borrow what is not yours instead of adopting a haphazard
amalgamation which is just shades of the governing with the hint of
the rest. There needs to be an account of the unheard and
unacknowledged, for if circumstance forbids current subjugators do
not engage with, their successors do. Work must not fetishize the
WWW.EDUMINATTI.COM
6. Something as persuasive and personal as literature should especially honor the
sanctity of the writer. Mothers teach their children to write from our hearts and
not our egos, but how do we write honestly when the material we jot by ‘digging
deep’ is a false or stolen construct? Makes you wonder why rapists like Alfred
Hitchock and Pablo Neruda are still being shoved down our throats in the school
curriculum.
Movements span decades and draw from a common body of work, making it
essential for truths spoken here to be evergreen. We can achieve that by having
those at the help who have been blindsided for these very decades. It is powerful,
ever-evolving, and persevering and, thus, should not be boxed into typical
characters holding the mic. To be dramatic, books are the harmony of people, but
if not all of them get to participate, we repeatedly choose to leave out those who
continue to exist for our comfort and insulation. There will come those in the
revolution who shall demand every single one to walk astride, and then this
topples.
As per the international schools in Dehradun, It is also imperative to see
microaggressions (subtle discriminations). Often, neutrality and invisibility are a
bigger crime in gaps in rights and liberties (think Dante Alighieri). To answer the
THE RIGHT PATH
WWW.EDUMINATTI.COM